View
106
Download
3
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Cover slide option 1 Title
Water Resources Development in the
Koshi Basin
Pennan Chinnasamy, Luna Bharati, Ambika
Khadka, Utsav [email protected]
Nepal Water WeekMarch 21, 2015
Photo: Hamish John Appleby / IWMI
INTRODUCTION
• IWMI
• IWMI Nepal
• Koshi basin
Taskent
WHY NEPAL?
• Nepal is one of the most water abundant countries in the world with total mean annual runoff of 224 billion cubic meters (BCM) and per capita water availability of 9,000 m3.
• There is large temporal and spatial variation in water availability. 85% of rainfall is during the four monsoon months (June-Sept.)
• Water resources remain a particularly under-developed sector –Nepal is currently only utilizing 7% of its annual water availability (14% in the Koshi Basin). 24% of arable land is irrigated and out of 43,000 MW hydropower potential, only 689 MW has been developed
• The impact of CC: what it means to future water availability and development.
• The general perception is that if this resource is properly harnessed, it would be the ticket out of poverty through economic growth mainly in the hydropower and agriculture sectors.
IWMI – NEPAL PROJECTS
•Basin level water
management
• Impact of Climate Change
in the basin level
•Water resources and
vulnerability assessments
for entire Nepal
Bharati 2015
KOSHI BASIN
Objectives for the Koshi Basin Analysis
• Resource assessment i.e. water availability vs. water use at sub-basin level (SWAT and WEAP)
• Impact of CC on river basin hydrology
• Future basin development scenarios – risks, vulnerabilities, opportunities
• Partners/Donors: ICIMOD, CIDA CSIRO, World Bank, WLE
KOSHI BASIN (CONTD…)
• Koshi Basin (87,311 km2): Transboundary basin-Largest contributor to the Ganges river
• The elevation of the basin varies from about 20m in the plains in India to more than 8,000 m in the Great Himalayan Range. Mount Everest (8,848 m) is also located in the basin.
• The basin in the Nepal part is undeveloped but there are plans to build multiple water infrastructure.
HYDROLOGICAL MODEL: SWAT
INPUT DATA
Spatial: topography – Digital elevation map
Land use map
Soil map
Climate data: Time series Rainfall
Min and max temperature
Relative Humidity
Solar Radiation
Wind Speed
Hydrological Cycle is based on following Water Balance Equation:
n
i
gwseepasurfdayot QwEQRSWSW1
)(
Where, SWt : Final soil water content (mm)SWo : Initial soil water content (mm)t : Time in daysRday : Amount of precipitation on day I (mm)Qsurf : Amount of surface runoff on day i (mm) Ea : Amount of evapotranspiration on day i (mm)wseep : Amount of percolation on day i (mm)Qgw : Amount of return flow on day i (mm)
KOSHI WATER BALANCE (1998-2008)
CC ANALYSISRCP4.5
RCP8.5
Water Resources Development in
the Koshi
• Water resource development in the Koshi basin• Need for water accounting model – WEAP• Water storage potential in the basin• Hydropower potential in the basin• Future water demands and how infrastructure
development can aid
Water use status (demand and supply) in the Koshi Basin
• Collection of district level water use and demand data
• Estimate relationship between water use and demand
• Test against future climate change scenarios
• Aid in formulation of better management plans
Study DefinitionSpatial Boundary System Components
Time Horizon Network Configuration
EvaluationWater Sufficiency Ecosystem Requirements
Pollutant Loadings Sensitivity Analysis
Current AccountsDemand Pollutant Generation
Reservoir Characteristics Resources and Supplies
River Simulation Wastewater Treatment
ScenariosDemographic and Economic Activity
Patterns of Water Use, Pollution Generation
Water System Infrastructure
Hydropower
Allocation, Pricing and Environmental Policy
Component Costs
Hydrology
WEAP
Structure
Results for 2000 baseline year and future Scenarios
Koshi Basin Water Supply Estimates• Spatial Variations• Temporal Variations
Water Demands in the basin• Spatial Variations• Temporal Variations• Sectoral Demands
Subbasin level annual average water demand for the Baseline Scenario.
Water Demands in the basin• Spatial Variations• Temporal Variations• Sectoral Demands
Subbasin level annual average water unmet demand for the Baseline Scenario.
Koshi Basin Water Resource Development
• Based on JICA (1985, 2014)
• 7 Run of the River Type• 4 Storage type• High capacity
• Sapta Koshi • Sun Koshi
www.iwmi.org
Water for a food-secure world
Results
Project Type
Available
Storage
(MCM)
Hydropower Generation (GWh)
Winter Pre-
monsoon Monsoon
Post-
monsoon Annual
Arun III ROR - 8 33 60 8 109
Bhote Koshi ROR - 47 100 187 72 406
Lower Arun ROR - 364 524 695 348 1931
Sundarijal ROR - 27 61 113 21 222
Sun Koshi (HEP) ROR - 25 54 94 38 210
Tama Koshi ROR - 38 161 372 63 634
Upper Arun ROR - 169 279 451 225 1124
Dudh Koshi S 162 25 34 209 47 315
Sapta Koshi High
Dam S 4420 761 2375 10716 2695 16547
Sun Koshi S 3040 242 501 3627 784 5154
Tamor S 760 81 553 2189 258 3081
Total 8382 1787 4676 18712 4558 29733
* ROR = Run-Of the-River, S = Storage
Total water storage potential is 8382 MCM
Water demand under Baseline scenario with WRDs.
Demands and Flow Winter Pre-
monsoon Monsoon
Post-
monsoon Annual
Baseline
Flow (m3/s) 39 166 699 144 262
Domestic demand (MCM) 386 395 524 262 1566 (6 %)
Agricultural demand (MCM) 1890 6608 13489 2009 23996 (92 %)
Industrial demand (MCM) 105 107 142 71 424 (2 %)
Demand (MCM) 2380 7110 14154 2342 25986
Unmet demand (MCM) 273 370 0 17 660
* Brackets indicate percentage change from Baseline scenario. MCM- Million Cubic Meters
Past Current Future
Wat
er d
eman
d
Time
Current trend
Higher water availability
Lower water availability
Lower stress/growth
Higher stress/growth
Future Scenarios
Seasonal variations in water demand and unmet demand under baseline, water resources
development, population growth, agricultural growth and industrial growth scenarios.
Scenarios Winter
Pre-
monsoon Monsoon
Post-
monsoon Annual
Baseline
Demand (MCM) 2380 7110 14154 2342 25986
Unmet (MCM) 273 370 0 17 660
Population growth
Demand (MCM) 2727 9356 15521 2576 30180
Unmet (MCM) 337 555 0 27 920
Unmet Percent change (%) 23 50 0 60 39
Agricultural growth
Demand (MCM) 2406 8795 15215 2506 28922
Unmet (MCM) 370 543 0 58 970
Unmet Percent change (%) 36 47 0 241 47
Industrial growth
Demand (MCM) 2788 9419 15604 2618 30429
Unmet (MCM) 386 575 7 35 1003
Unmet Percent change (%) 41 55 0 106 52
* Unmet Percentage Change is the change in unmet demand between Baseline and Scenario.
Seasonal variations in water demand and unmet demand under baseline, water resources
development, population growth, agricultural growth and industrial growth scenarios.
Scenarios Winter
Pre-
monsoon Monsoon
Post-
monsoon Annual
Baseline
Demand (MCM) 2380 7110 14154 2342 25986
Unmet (MCM) 273 370 0 17 660
Population growth
Demand (MCM) 2727 9356 15521 2576 30180
Unmet (MCM) 337 555 0 27 920
Unmet Percent change (%) 23 50 0 60 39
Agricultural growth
Demand (MCM) 2406 8795 15215 2506 28922
Unmet (MCM) 370 543 0 58 970
Unmet Percent change (%) 36 47 0 241 47
Industrial growth
Demand (MCM) 2788 9419 15604 2618 30429
Unmet (MCM) 386 575 7 35 1003
Unmet Percent change (%) 41 55 0 106 52
* Unmet Percentage Change is the change in unmet demand between Baseline and Scenario.
Total water storage
potential is 8382 MCM !
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
4000
0
2000
4000
6000
8000
10000
12000
14000
16000
18000
20000
Peak
Lo
ad (
MW
)
Ener
gy (
GW
h)
year
Energy (GWh)
System Peak Load(MW)
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
4000
0
2000
4000
6000
8000
10000
12000
14000
16000
18000
20000
Peak
Lo
ad (
MW
)
Ener
gy (
GW
h)
year
Energy (GWh)
System Peak Load(MW)
Total Hydropower generation is 29000 GWh
www.iwmi.org
A water-secure world
Total annual volume of water flowing into India = 57405 MCM
Total annual volume of water flowing into India = 55138 MCM
Base Case : Year 2000 Case 1: Irrigated area = Irrigable area
Case 2: Hydropower generation + E-flows (B)Total annual volume of water flowing into India = 56837 MCM
www.iwmi.org
Water for a food-secure world
Conclusion• Study provides first estimates of sectoral water demands and unmet demands for
the basin.• Study provides first estimates of the water storage and hydropower generation
potential for the basin.• Water resource developments can ease climate vulnerability, water availability
issues and future water demands.• Water resource developments can have huge hydropower generation potential
• Ease current and future National power shortage • Enable economic growth by trans-boundary power sharing agreements• Industrial developments