Upload
eip-water
View
945
Download
2
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Water reuse – status and contribution to EU initiative9 February 2016 – Side meeting
Castell – Platja d’Aro, a reference case for water reclamation and reuse
www.eip-water.eu/RTWQM
Water reuse – status and contribution to the EU initiative
Presentation outline
RTWQM Action Group Objectives Consorci Costa Brava (CCB) and water reuse in CCB R3water project and water reuse in R3water Castell – Platja d’Aro Case Study R3water innovative technologies in Castell – Platja d’Aro Regulatory aspects on Monitoring strategies
Environmental, planning and socio-economic aspects from the experience
Urban Water Cycle in the context of the Circular Economy
Water reuse – status and contribution to the EU initiative
RTWQM Action Group Objectives
Objective: to foster solutions to water challenges based on online water quality monitoring technologies and affordable monitoring strategies
Water sectors: water bodies, drinking water and waste water, including water reclamation and reuse
Applications: Resource efficiency, in terms of chemical dosing and energy, in water
treatment processes for both water supply and waste water; Early warning systems to detect pollution of surface water, ground
water catchments and drinking water resources; Control networks to monitor industrial and urban waste water
discharges and water reuse schemes.
Water reuse – status and contribution to the EU initiative
Consorci Costa Brava Water utility (1971) providing water
services to 27 municipalities in the coastal strip of Girona’s province
Resident population: 250,000 inhabitants; estimated peak population in summer > 1 million inhabitants
Wholesale drinking water supply to 23 municipalities (17.7 million m3/y in 2015)
Biological wastewater treatment in 18 WWTP serving 31 municipalities (28.2 million m3/y in 2015)
Water reuse – status and contribution to the EU initiative
Water Reuse in CCB
Reclaimed water production and supply for non-potable uses (3.3 million m3/y in 2015; max 6.4 million m3/y in 2010)
Water reuse – status and contribution to the EU initiative
R3water Project
www.r3water.eu/
This project has received funding from the European Union’s Seventh Programme for research, technological development and demonstration under grant agreement No 619093.
Water reuse – status and contribution to the EU initiative
R3water Project
Demonstration of innovative solutions for Reuse of water, Recovery of valuables and Resource efficiency in urban wastewater treatment:• To support the transition from an urban wastewater treatment plant
to a production unit of different valuables by demonstrating new solutions to address main challenges;
• To facilitate the market uptake of these innovative solutions.
What is R3water ?
Water reuse – status and contribution to the EU initiative
Water Reuse in R3water
Innovative technologies:• DOSCONTROL (TEQMA): Advanced control for combined (UV+Cl) water
disinfection• AQUABIO (ADASA): Online monitoring of E.coli and total coliforms in water• AQUATRACK (AQUA-Q): Early warning system for pathogens in water
coupled with sampler
Demonstration sites:• Hammarby Sjostadsverk: IVL’s pilot plant (Stockholm – Sweden)• Castell – Platja d’Aro WWTP (Costa Brava – Spain)
R3Water workshop “From Innovation to Market: The Second Valley of Death” (11th February 2016 in Leeuwarden, NL)http://r3water.eu/r3water-workshop-from-innovation-to-market-the-second-valley-of-death-11th-february-2016-in-leeuwarden-nl/
Water reuse – status and contribution to the EU initiative
Castell – Platja d’Aro Case Study
WWTP• Municipalities of Castell-Platja d’Aro, Platja d’Aro, Sant Feliu de Guixols and Santa
Cristina d’Aro
• Average capacity of 35.000 m3/day, and 175.000 p.e., high seasonality
• Primary treatment, secondary treatment with conventional activated sludge and a tertiary treatment for golf course and agricultural irrigation
Water Reclamation• Water Reclamation Plant (WRP) is
designed for a 15.000 m3/day flow• Gravity sand filtration + combined
disinfection (UV + Sodium hypochlorite)
Water reuse – status and contribution to the EU initiative
Castell – Platja d’Aro Case Study
Water reuse – status and contribution to the EU initiative
Castell – Platja d’Aro Case Study
Main reclaimed water users: 2 golf courses, one pitch & putt facility and two agricultural irrigation communities (corn and orchard products, respectively)
On-demand production, with a buffer storage of 325 m3
• Maximum peak production: 400m3/h, during the summer 2015• The increase in the number of users has increased the demand almost at the
limit of the current production capacity at hourly peak demand period.
Water reuse – status and contribution to the EU initiative
Technologies: Water reclamationContinuous control of combined disinfection process in water reclamation• The appropriated combination of chemical + physical
disinfection, generates positive synergies delivering enhanced microbiology load reduction and substantial reduction of operational costs and an increase in the safety of the reclaimed water produced
• The increased disinfection spectrum process ensures a residual concentration of biocide through the distribution network, limiting possible regrowth
Benefits• Efficient safe water production, providing the adjusted
dose of each disinfectant agent allowing fit-for-purpose production of reclaimed water, according to the intended water quality for the reuse (irrigation, environmental and industrial uses)
• Valuable real time information of the disinfection process• Reduction in O&M associated costs
Water reuse – status and contribution to the EU initiative
Technologies: Online monitoringContinuous measurement equipment for: Escherichia coli and total coliforms simultaneously.• Used technique: Defined Substrate Technology® (DST®) and detection system by
measuring fluorescence and absorbance. Applicability• E. coli is a bacteria widely used as an indicator of faecal contamination, and also
key indicators for determining the potential uses of reclaimed water from a WWTP tertiary treatment.
Benefits• Early warning in case of the water reclamation plant
malfunctioning.• Efficient production of reclaimed water, avoiding overdosing of
disinfection chemicals and excess of UV power consumption.• Allows the production of fit-for-purpose reclaimed water.
Water reuse – status and contribution to the EU initiative
Regulatory aspects: Monitoring strategiesDuring 2014, a market study was conducted in the scope of RTWQM, based on the survey and the experience from more than 70 water experts.
Regarding one question about the discrete sampling, 70% of the answers point out that the current water sampling strategies stipulated in the water directives are not properly representing the real status of the water bodies and treatment processes.
current monitoring regulations defined in the water directives as a barrier for the adoption of innovative monitoring technologies ???
Water reuse – status and contribution to the EU initiative
Regulatory aspects: Monitoring in EU water directives
The monitoring requirements defined in the water directives are following a set of common steps:• Specify the minimum sampling frequency• Specify the water quality parameters to be monitored• Specify the physical/chemical/biological analysis method
Monitoring requirement
RTWQM applicability
Comments
Minimum sampling frequency
RTWQM technologies can provide sampling frequencies from minutes to hours, in any case higher than discrete manual sampling.
Quality parameters Not all the required quality parameters can be monitored online.
Analysis method Definitely, the online monitoring methods will often be different from those specified for laboratory.
Thus, the major barriers to online monitoring are:• The specification of compulsory laboratory analysis methods.• Available online monitoring technologies are not taken in consideration when defining the
quality parameters.
Water reuse – status and contribution to the EU initiative
Regulatory aspects: Spanish regulation on Water Reuse
National Water Reuse Directive ES: RD 1620/2007• Establish different thresholds for the physicochemical and biological
parameters, according to the intended reuse, and even according to the different irrigated crop types
But it presents some drawbacks that might act as barrier for the development of new water reuse schemes• First, the legal mechanism (Real Decreto) seems ‘written on stone’• The nematode eggs parameter is not relevant for reclaimed water• The nitrate threshold level for aquifer recharge is more stringent than for
drinking water supply itself• High frequency of analysis (i.e., E. coli can be required up to 3 times/week)
required by the regulation causes an increase in the costs of lab analysis but does not effectively protect the quality of reclaimed water
Water reuse – status and contribution to the EU initiative
Regulatory aspects: The WSP approachThe early warning function will never be fulfilled by specifying discrete sampling strategies and laboratory analysis methods, and, in the limit, increasing the sampling frequency will not be sustainable in terms of efforts and costs.
The Water Safety Plan (WSP)* is a risk-based approach that identifies which parameters are critical, and accordingly, set up the monitoring strategies to be adopted, including online monitoring.
A potential approach to be explored, providing an effective combination of:• discrete sampling, required for regulatory compliance, and providing
accurate measures for more water quality parameters • and online monitoring, suitable for process control and optimization,
and providing event detection and early warning functionality(*) Water safety plan manual: step-by-step risk management for drinking-water suppliers. WHO. Geneva, 2009
Water reuse – status and contribution to the EU initiative
Environmental, planning and socio-economic aspects from the experience
Key messages from 27 years of experience in
water reclamation and reuse in Castell Platja ‘dAro
Water reuse – status and contribution to the EU initiative
Environmental aspects• Decrease of the depletion of strategic groundwater resources• Efficiency of fertigation, introducing nutrient recovery and reducing the environmental
impacts of diffuse agriculture pollution• Allows changing dry crops to irrigated crops. In the case of maize, doubles the
atmospheric CO2 uptake
(*) J. Muñoz and L. Sala: Environmental criteria for alternative nutrient removal in treated wastewater. 6th Conference on Wastewater Reclamation and Reuse for Sustainability, October 9-12, 2007, Antwerp, Belgium http://ccbgi.org/docs/antwerp_2007/poster2007.pdf
Water reuse – status and contribution to the EU initiative
Economic and planning aspects
• The WWTP Ecosystem: The environmental and economic sustainability of the water reuse scheme is limited by the presence of potential users in the WWTP area
• The use of reclaimed water for irrigation has lower OPEX than extracting groundwaters + purchasing fertilizers
• Better crop response and more valuable crops production, saving fertilization costs
• Funding sources vs. whole urban water cycle approach: the reclaimed water as an alternative local water source to be managed by water supply utilities rather than an isolated service provided by the wastewater facilities
Water reuse – status and contribution to the EU initiative
Users and social acceptance aspects
• Opportunity for the generation of new economical activities and job creation in the WWTP Ecosystem
• Continuity of economical activities and municipal services (gardens irrigation, cleaning of facilities) even during severe drought episodes (3 events between 1998 – 2008)
• End-users acceptance: the number of users has been increasing during the years and even farmers located relatively far away are interested in being connected to the water reuse network
• “Reuse of treated waste water”: please avoid to use ‘wastewater’ together with the term ‘reuse’, this will generate reluctance in the users and public and it will hamper the wide adoption of water reuse in EU REUSE OF RECLAIMED WATER
Water reuse – status and contribution to the EU initiative
Urban Water Cycle in the context of the Circular Economy
Drinking Water Plant
City
Waste WaterTreatment Plant
Water ReclamationPlantDrinking
water
Wastewater
Treated water
Fertigation uses
Municipal uses
Aquifer recharge
Reclaimed water
Rawwater
Online Monitoring for efficiency
Online Monitoring for early warning
Depletion of strategic water resources
Water body
Public acceptance
Reclaimed water demandfrom users
Overall operational costs
Protection of water bodies
Crop production
Fertilization
CO2 net emissions
Efficient nutrient recovery
Diffuse agriculture pollution
Economical activities and job creation
Water reuse – status and contribution to the EU initiative
Acknowledments
• Lluis Sala - http://www.ccbgi.org/
• Uwe Fortkamp - http://www.ivl.se/
• Ernest Mejias - http://www.teqma.com/
• Montserrat Batlle - http://adasaproducts.com/
• Corina Carpentier - http://benten-water.com/
• EIP Water Secretariat
THANKS FOR YOUR ATTENTION
Sergio de Campos
RTWQM Coordinator