Upload
shivu-p
View
251
Download
3
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Contents of Section 5 Reticular canal system for Interlinking Indian Rivers Chapter 6-Facts and figures related to Reservoirs of India 61-FampF ndash Reservoirs and dams in India 62-FampF ndash Projects across River kosi 63-FampF ndash Irrigation projects along the river Godavari 64-FampF ndash Narmada river water projects 65-FampF ndashWater dispute ndash Height of almatti dam
Chapter 6 Facts and figures related to Reservoirs of India
61 FampF ndash Reservoirs and dams in India [Reservoirs and dams in India
Map of the major rivers lakes and reservoirs in India
This page lists the reservoirs and dams in India
Andhra Pradesh
Nagarjuna Sagar Dam
Srisailam Project
Srisailam Dam
Nizam Sagar
joorala project
rajolibanda dam
kiol sagar
Telugu Ganga
Polavaram dam
Nijam Sagar Reservoir
Osman Sagar
Sriram Sagar Reservoir
Lower Maneru Reservoir
Himayath Sagar Reservoir
Dindi Reservoir
Somasila
Gandipalem Reservoir
Dowleswaram Barrage
prakasam barrage
Tatipudi Reservoir
Inchampalli
Pulichintala
Ellammpalli
Singur Dam
Dummagudem
NagarjunaSagar TailPond
Sunkesula
Musi Reservoir
pothireddy padu
Ramagundam Dam
Pranahita Chevella
Intenuka Muriki Kaluva Reservoir
jeri dam
Gujarat
Sardar Sarovar Project on Narmada river
Ukai Dam near Surat
Dharoi Dam on Sabarmati River near Dharoi
Vasana Berej on Sabarmati River near Ahmedabad
Check Dams
Himachal Pradesh+ Punjab
Bhakra Dam on Sutlej river near Nangal
Gobind Sagar
Maharana Pratap Sagar
Pong Dam Reservoir on Beas River near Talwara
Pandoh Dam on Beas River near Mandi
Chamera Dam on Ravi River near Chamba
Nathpa Dam on Sutlej River near Rampur
Jammu and Kashmir
Salal Project
Jharkhand
Maithon Dam
Chandil Dam on Swarnarekha River near Chandil
Karnataka
Hidkal Jalashaya (Dam) across Ghataprabha
Dhupdal Reservior across Ghataprabha
Krishna Raja Sagara Dam
Alamatti Damacross Krishna
Basava Sagara Dam
Linganamakki dam
Supa Dam
Kodasalli Dam
Kadra Dam
Tunga Bhadra Dam
Kabini Reservoir
Harangi Dam
Narayanpur Dam downstream of Alamatti Dam
Garura Dam Krishna River
Hemavathi Reservoir (Gorur Dam)
Naviltheertha Dam across Malaprabha
Nethravathi river
Linganmakki Dam across Sharavathi River
Gajanuru Dam across Tunga river
Lakkavali Dam across Bhadra river
Kerala
Banasura Sagar Dam
Malampuzha Dam
Chalakkudy Dam
Peechi dam
Vazhani dam
Mangalam dam
Mattupetty Dam
Kundala dam in Munnar
Parambikulam Dam
Pothundi Dam
Walayar Dam
Idukki arch dam in idukki
Mullaperiyar Dam
Malankara Dam
Neyyar Dam
Siruvani Dam
Meenkara Dam
Kanjhirapuzha
Chulliyar Dam
Jeevana dam
Madhya Pradesh
Bansagar
Bargi Dam
Barna Dam
Gandhi Sagar dam
Indirasagar
Madikheda Dam
Narmada Dam Project
Rajghat
Tawa Reservoir
halali dam
kolar dam
kerwa dam
Maharashtra
MULA Dam Rahuri - River MULA
Koyna Dam - River Koyna
Jaikwadi
Ujani -River Bhima
Mulshi Dam - River Mula
Khadakwasla - River Mutha
Kolkewadi Dam
Panshet - River Mutha
Radhanagari
Bhatsa
Tansa
Vaitarna
Pawna - River Pawna
Bhandardara
Gangapur Dam Nashik
Ozarkhed Dam Nashik
Karanjwan Dam
Nandur Madhmeshwar Dam
Yeldari on Purna River Near Parbhani
Siddheshwar on Purna River Near Parbhani
Manar On River Manar Near Nanded
Girna On River Girna
Chaskaman On River Bhima Near Rajgurunagar
Pravara On River Godavari
Isapur Dam on River Painganga River
Bhadardara On River Pravara
Meghalaya
Umiam Lake
Orissa
Balimela Reservoir
Hirakud Dam on Mahanadi River near Sambalpur
Balimela Reservoir
Jalaput on Machkund River near Jaypore Koraput District
Indravati Dam on river Indravati in kalahandi district
Salia dam on river Kharkhari in Ganjam District
Tamil Nadu
Aliyar Reservoir
Amaravathi Reservoir
Amaravathi Dam
Anaikuttam Reservoir
Anainaduvu Reservoir
Bhavanisagar Reservoir
Chittar Reservoir
Chittar Reservoir-1
Chittar Reservoir-2
Gatana Reservoir
Golwarpatti Reservoir
Gomukhinadhi Reservoir
Gundar Reservoir
Gunderippalam Reservoir
Kariakoil Reservoir
Karupppanadhi Reservoir
Kelavarapalli Reservoir
Kesarigulihalla Reservoir
Kodaganar Reservoir
Kovilar Reservoir
Krishnagiri Reservoir
Kullursandai Reservoir
Kutharaiyar Reservoir
Lower Nirar Reservoir
Manimukthanadhi Reservoir
Manimuthar Reservoir
Manjalar Reservoir
Marudhanadhi Reservoir
Mettur Dam
Nagavathi Reservoir
Noyyal Oarathuppalayam
Palar Porandalar Reservoir
Pambar Reservoir
Parambikulam Reservoir
Parappalar Reservoir
Pechiparai Reservoir
Periyar Reservoir (Pilavukkal Project)
Periyar Reservoir
Perumpallam Reservoir
Perunchani Reservoir
Peruvaripallam
Ponnaniar Reservoir
Ramanadhi Reservoir
Sathanur Reservoir
Sholayar Reservoir
Siddhamalli Reservoir
Soolagiri chinnar Reservoir
Stanley Reservoir
Thambalahalli Reservoir
Thirumurthi Reservoir
Thoppaiyar Reservoir
Thunakadavu Reservoir
Uppar Reservoir
Upper Nirar Wier
Vaigai Dam
Vaigai Reservoir
Vaniyar Reservoir
Varadamanadhi Reservoir
Varattupallam Reservoir
Vattamalaikarai Odai Reservoir
Vembakottai Reservoir
Vidur Reservoir
Willingdon Reservoir
Uttar Pradesh
Govind Ballabh Pant Sagar on Rihand River in Sonbhadra
Kalagarh Dam on Ramganga River in Kalagarh
Parichha Dam on Betwa River in Parichha (Jhansi District)
List of Dams in Lalitpur District Uttar Pradesh
o (A) Matatila Dam constructed during 1952-1964 on Betwa River in Lalitpur District Uttar Pradesh
Length 630 km Height 3353 Meters Area 20720 Sqkm Storage 113268 Mcm
o (B) Jamni Dam constructed during 1962-1973 on Jamni River in Lalitpur District Uttar Pradesh
Length 640 km Height 1918 Meters Area 414 Sqkm Storage 9289 Mcm
o (C) Rohini Dam constructed during 1976-1984 on Rohini River in Lalitpur District Uttar Pradesh
Length 165km Height 1550 Meters Area 44 Sqkm Storage 1212 Mcm
o (D) Shahzad Dam constructed during 1973-1992 on Shahzad River in Lalitpur District Uttar
Pradesh Length 416 km Height 1800 Meters Area 514 Sqkm Storage 13000 Mcm
o (E) Govind Sagar Dam constructed during 1947-1953 on Shahzad River in Lalitpur District Uttar
Pradesh Length 360 km Height 1829 Meters Area 368 Sqkm Storage 968 Mcm
o (F) Sajnam Dam constructed during 1977-1990 on Sajnam River in Lalitpur District Uttar Pradesh
Length 515 km Height 1878 Meters Area 290 Sqkm Storage 8350 Mcm
o (G) Sukma-Dukma Dam a below water construction on Betwa River near Jhansi District Uttar
Pradesh Length 215 km Height 2078 Meters
Uttarakhand
Tehri dam
Dhauli ganga dam
Sriram Sagar
Devadula Lift Irrigation Project
Kaddam
Manjira Reservoir
Lower Tirna
Purna
Upper PenGanga
Lower Dudhana
Jayakwadi Dam
Bhandara Reservoir
Mula Reservoir
Upper Pravara
Upper Indravati Project
Godavari Canal
Upper WainGanga
Majalgaon irrigation project is located in the Godavari river basin in the state of Maharashtra
West Bengal
Panchet Dam
Dam projects
Narmada Dam Project
Banasura Sagar Dam - Banasurasagar Project
Noyyal River - Tanks System
Farakka Barrage
Source [34] ]
All the dams and the areas which are below the level of 500mts AMSL except in the states of Jammu
and Kashmir Northestern states will get the water form RCS and the principle feeders will be the
Ganga and the Yamuna
All the dams and the areas which are below the level of 300mts AMSL except in the states of Jammu
and Kashmir Northestern states will get the water form RCS and the principle feeders will be the
Brahamaputra for the RCS
All the dams and the areas which are below the level of 900mts AMSL in south deccan platue
especially the southern districts of Karnataka western districts of Andra Pradesh and Tamilnadu will
get the water from the RCS and the principle feeders will be the River Kavery
All the dams and the areas which are below the level of 800mts AMSL in north India like states of
Punjab Haryana Himachal Pradesh Delhi northern district of Uttarpradesh Bihar which are north
to the course of Ganga and Yamuna will get the water from the RCS and the principle feeders will be
the Ganaga and Yamuna Rivers
62 FampF ndash Projects across River kosi [Kosi River
Development scenario
Multipurpose projects
After India attained independence in August 1947 the development scenario in India has been
resolute on technological development In keeping with this approach the National Flood Control
Policy in 1954 (following the disastrous floods of 1954 in a large part of the Koshi river basin) stated
that floods could be controlled through a series of flood protection works like dams embankments
and river training works One such work which drew the immediate attention of the policy planners
after independence was a solution to the recurring flood menace faced by people of North Bihar due
to the Kosi and other rivers flowing from Nepal to India The Kosi project was thus conceptualized
(based on investigations between 1946 to 1955) in three continuous interlinked stages ndash the first
was a barrage to anchor this wayward river that had migrated about 120 km (75 mi) westward in the
last 250 years laying waste to a huge tract in north Bihar and to provide irrigation and power
benefits to Nepal and India The second part was to build embankments both below and above the
barrage so as to jacket the river within the defined channel The third part envisaged a high
multipurpose dam within Nepal at Barakshetra to provide substantial flood cushion along with large
irrigation and power benefits to both countries This was followed up by signing of the Kosi
Agreement between Nepal and India on 25 April 1954 and which was revised on 19 December 1966
to address the concerns of Nepal Further letters of Exchange to the Agreement between the two
countries provided for additional schemes for providing benefits of irri gation While the first two
parts of the concept plan have been implemented at the cost of the Government of India the third
part namely the Koshi High dam the kingpin of the whole concept for various political reasons
precluded any action for several years but has since been revived under a fresh agreement in a
modified form for further investigations and studies
Details of the above projects are elaborated below
Kosi barrage and irrigation
Kosi Barrage also called Bhimnagar Barrage after the name of the place where it was built between
the years 1959 and 1963 straddles the Indo-Nepal border It is an irrigation flood control and
hydropower generation project on the Kosi river built under a bilateral agreement between Nepal
and India the entire cost of the project was borne by India The catchment area of the river is
61788 km2 (23856 sq mi) in Nepal at the Barrage site The highest peaks ndash the Mount Everest and
the Mount Kanchenjunga mdash lie in its catchment About 10 of this catchment is snow-fed The
Eastern Canal and the Western Canal taking off from the barrage have been designed for a discharge
capacity of 455 cubic metres per second (16100 cu fts) to irrigate 6125 square kilometres
(1514000 acres) and 210 cubic metres per second (7400 cu fts) to irrigate 35661 square
kilometres (881200 acres) respectively A hydropower plant has been built on the Eastern Canal at
a canal drop (36 km (22 mi) from the Koshi Barrage) to generate 20 MW The Western Kosi Canal
provides irrigation to 250 square kilometres (62000 acres) in Nepal A valuable bridge over the
barrage opened up the East-West highway in the eastern sector of Nepal
An inundation canal taking off at Chatra where the Kosi debouches into the plains has been built to
irrigate a gross area of 860 kmsup2 in Nepal The project has been renovated with IDA assistance after
Nepal took over the project in 1976
Silt deposition near Kosi embankment at Navbhata Saharsa Bihar India
Kosi embankment system
The Kosi barrage with earth dams across river afflux bunds and embankments above and below the
river confines the river to flow within embankments Embankments on both sides downstream of
the barrage with a length of 246 km (153 mi) has been constructed to check the westward
movement of the river The embankments have been kept wide apart about 12 to 16 km (99 mi) to
serve as a silt trap
Sapta Kosi High Multipurpose Project (Indo-Nepal)
Government of India (GOI) and His Majestys Government of Nepal (HMGN) have agreed to conduct
joint investigations and other studies for the preparation of Detailed Project Report (DPR) of Sapta
Kosi High Dam Multipurpose Project and Sun Kosi Storage-cum-Diversion Scheme to meet the
objectives of both the countries for Development of a) hydropower generation b) irrigation c) flood
controlmanagement and d) navigation
A 269-metre (880 ft) high concreteRock fill dam on the Sapta Koshi River with a dam toe
underground power house with an installed capacity of 3000 MW at 50 load factor a barrage on
river Sapta Kosi about 8 km (50 mi) downstream of Sapta Kosi High Dam to re-regulate the water
being released from the Sapta Koshi dam with two canals Eastern Chhatra Canal and Western
Chhatra Canal off-taking from the either bank from barrage site to provide water for irrigation both
in Nepal and India and Navigation through Koshi up to Kursela and also in the reservoir of Sapta
Koshi dam are envisaged
A Power Canal off-taking from the Eastern Chatra Canal is proposed for conveying the water
required for irrigation at existing Kosi barrage at Hanuman Nagar and also the water which may be
required downstream of Hanuman Nagar Barrage for the purpose of navigation To utilize the head
available between Chatra and Hanuman Nagar barrages for power generation three canal Power
Houses each of 100 MW installed capacity are also proposed on power canal
Necessary cushion in storage capacity of Sapta Kosi High Dam would be provided to moderate the
flood downstream of dam
Chatra Canal System would provide irrigation to large areas in Nepal and India (particularly in Bihar)
A Joint Project Office (JPO) has been set up in Nepal for investigation of the project
Hydropower
Nepal has a total estimated potential of 83290 MW out of which economically exploitable potential
is 42140 MW The Koshi river basin contributes 22350 MW of this potential(360 MW from small
schemes and 1875 MW from major schemes) and the economically exploitable potential is assessd
as 10860 MW (includes the Sapta Koshi Multipurpose Project [3300MW] mentioned above) Source [34]]
Damages to the canal ndash embankment ndash hydroelectrical projects are the possibilities if we create the
projects at places where we can expect high flow in short time of period It is better to target the
water at higher level before they unite and form big volume of water at one point
63 FampF ndash Irrigation projects along the river Godavari
[Godavari River Basin Irrigation Projects
Godavari River Delta
The Godavari River has its catchment area in five states of India Maharashtra Chattisgarh Madhya
Pradesh Andhra Pradesh Karnataka and Orissa
Dowleswaram Barrage
Jalaput
Balimela Reservoir
Upper Indravati
Nizam Sagar
Dams and bridges along the river
A barrage was built on the river at Dowleswaram was built by Sir Arthur Cotton in 1850 It was
rebuilt as a barrage and roadway during 1980s and named after him The roadway connects
Dowleswaram in East Godavari and Vijjeswaram in West Godavari
There is also a big dam built just after the source of the river at Trimbakeshwar The dam is in the
town of Gangapur which literally means a town on a river The dam provides drinking water to the
residents of Nashik and also supplies water to the thermal power station situated downstream at
Eklahara which provides power to the town
There is another multipurpose project on the Godavari River named Sri Ram Sagar Project in
Nizamabad District It is in the town of Pochampad 60km away from Nizamabad It irrigates 4
districts of Northern Telangana Region of Andhra Pradesh and supplies power
The Jayakwadi dam near Paithan is one of the largest earthen dam in India This dam was built to
address the problem of drought in Marathwada region and problem of flood along the bank of river
Two left and right canals provide the irrigation to fertile land up to Nanded district This dam has
major contribution in industrial development of Aurangabad
Source [34]]
All the dams which are at the level of 500mts AMSL will receive the water from FPC1 and thoses at
or below the level of 300mts AMSL will receive the water from FPC4
64 FampF ndash Narmada river water projects
[Narmada River
Narmada river development (NRD)
The Narmada river has a huge water resources potential as much as 3321 MAF (41000 Mcum) of
average annual flow (more than 90 of this flow occurring during the monsoon months of June ndash
September) which according to estimates is greater than the combined annual flows of the Ravi
Beas and the Sutlej rivers which feed the Indus basin The 75 dependable flow is 28 MAF (34537
MCM) Till the beginning of planned development in the country was started in 1946 this huge
potential went almost abegging without any effective utilization thus denying much needed succour
to the drought stricken people of the valley both in Madhya Pradesh and Gujarat Since then plans
have been evolved debated finally legally examined and adjudicated by a tribunal agitated by
NGOs The Supreme Court has finally intervened to ensure that the implementation of the projects is
not halted
Early background and dispute
Investigations for harnessing the Narmada waters started around the time of independence when
Central Waterways Irrigation and Navigation Commission) (CWINC) identified several storage
schemes and in 1948 the Khosla Committee prioritized the proposals and named Tawa Bargi
Punasa and Bharuch projects (the last three on the main stem of the river) for preparation of
reports The reports were ready by 1963 A parallel study of the Hydropower potential identified 16
sites with a potential of 1300 MW While the project in Gujarat called Baruch Weir project (for which
Jawaharlal Nehru laid the foundation stone in 1961) went through a series of modifications and
improvements with a reformed scheme at Navagam village to extend benefits up to the Rann of
Kutch but following the bifurcation of the erstwhile Bombay state into Maharashtra and Gujarat
states and Gujaratrsquos intent to raise the height of the dam at Navagam to maximize storage benefits
at the cost of submergence of potential hydropower sites in Maharashtra and Madhya Pradesh
created a dispute between the states This resulted in an impasse in the implementation o f the
agreed projects at Navagam in Gujarat Punasa in MP and Bargi dam in MP and power benefit
sharing among the states with MP refusing to ratify the agreements To break the logjam a high
level Committee was appointed by the Govt of India in Septembe r 1964 In 1965 the Committee
prepared a Master Plan for the basin which involved construction of 12 major projects in MP and the
Navagam dam in Gujarat It provided irrigation priority over power irrigation of 2630 kmsup2 in MP
400 kmsup2 in Maharashtra 1850 kmsup2 in Gujarat and 4000 kmsup2 in Rajasthan The storages it
recommended in MP involved Bargi Tawa and Narmadasagar (Punasa) while its proposed Navagam
high dam would submerge the hydelpower project sites of Jalasindhi (in Maharshtra) and Harinphal
(MP) but without any more submergence than would be caused by the three dams if separately
constructed Gujarat endorsed this proposal but Maharashtra was not willing to go by it After
intense parleys failed to resolve the problem GOI decided to set up the Narmada Water Disputes
Tribunal (NWDT) in 1969 under the Inter State Water Disputes Act 1956 to adjudicate on the
dispute relating to sharing of water of the inter-state river Narmada and its valley
Tribunal award After ten years of deliberations the Narmada Water Disputes Tribunal (NWDT) gave
its award in December 1979 The NWDT considering the development of the water resources of the
basin as a whole gave its award allocating share of water (after accepting the mutually agreed
settlement among the four party states in 1974 on sharing of the waters of Narmada on the basis
of a determination by the Tribunal of the height of the Navagam dam or the Sardar Sarovar dam)
and Hydro Power of the Sardar Sarovar Project
The Tribunalrsquos final order determined the utilizable quantum of Narmada waters to be 27 million
acre feet at 75 dependability and allocated it to the four states as in Table below including share
of power benefits It also stipulated the share of water when utilizable flow was in excess of 28
million acre feet The Navagam dam height was fixed at FRL 460 feet (140 m) with a maximum water
level of EL feet The Full Supply Level of the Navagam canal was fixed at 300 feet (91 m) The cost
sharing formula among the states and the consequent requirement of release of regulated releases
from the Narmada Sagar dam by MP was also spelt out The resettlement and rehabilitation package
was also clearly specified with all costs to be borne by Gujarat for all resettlement and rehabilitation
work of people affected in the three states and also for relocating any ancient or historic
monuments places of worship or idols likely to suffer submergence
Party state Alloted share of
water in million
acre feet (MAF)
share of
power
Madya Pradesh 1825 57
Gujarath 9 16
Maharastra 025 27
Rajastan 05 Nil
Total 28 100
The uniqueness of this Award is that a non riparian state ndash Rajasthan ndash has been allocated a share of
Narmada waters for meeting the water requirements of the drought prone districts of Barmer and
Jalore which have no other source of dependable water
Go ahead for the projects The work on the project did not start soon since extensive studies were
undertaken for project designing and with World Bank getting involved with funding studies and
project costs (Loan agreement with GOI of $450 million was signed in May 1985) the Resettlement
and Rehabilitation package was substantially revised over and above what was set in the NWDT
and environmental studies had to be undertaken But the environmental and forest cle arances for
the projects from the newly formed Ministry of Environment and Forests (MoEampF) involved
extensive inter-ministerial and inter departmental discussions (within the central govt and with state
govts) for a substantial period and it was only in June 1987 (almost 8 years after the NWDT award
was given in Dec 1979) that the MoEampF gave a conditional approval to the Sardar Sarovar and
Narmada Sagar Projects The Forest clearance was given in September 1987 for Sardar Sarovar only
The clearance also required the work to be done pari passu with the construction of the dams and
the filling of the reservoir In the mean time the Narmada Control Authority (NCA) an inter-State
Administrative Authority and the Sardar Sarovar Construction Advisory Committee (SSCAC) were set
up in 1980 by the Govt of India in compliance of the NWDT award the former organization was set
up in Dec 1980 as body corporate with representatives from the four party states and Govt of India
as a machinery to implement the decisions and directions of the NWDT and the later organization
was set up in Sept 1980 as a statutory body to ensure efficient economical and timely execution of
the Unit I (Dam amp appurtenant works) and Unit III (Hydropower works) of the Sardar Sarovar Project
(SSP) A Review Committee consisting of the Union Minister for Irrigation (now substituted by Union
Minister for Water Resources) as its Chairperson and the Chief Ministers of Madhya Pradesh
Maharashtra Gujarat and Rajasthan as its members is also in position to review the decisions of the
NCA and the SSCAC as required For monitoring and implementation of various environmental
activities effectively independent machinery of Environment Sub-Group is functioning since
Nov1987 under NCA Similarly for monitoring the progress of the resettlement and rehabilitation of
project affected people RampR subgroup is also functioning under the NCA At the state level Sardar
Sarovar Narmada Nigam Limited (SSNL) in Gujarat has the mandate to implement and manage the
Sardar Sarovar multipurpose project In Madhya Pradesh the Narmada Valley Development
Authority (NVDA) is vested the responsibility for implementation of the projects
Narmada River
Layout of Water Resources Development Projects in the Narmada Basin in Gujarat amp Madhya
Pradesh
Even though the tribunal award resolved the initial issue of water sharing however the height of
dam benefit sharing and the mode of settlement of project-affected people caused serious
difficulties in implementation particularly of the Sardar Sarovar dam (the terminal dam on the river)
Project-affected people agitated under the banner of the dedicated NGO - The Narmada Bachao
Andolan (NBA) The NBA followed up by Public Interest Litigation (PIL) in the Supreme Court The
NBA questioned the benefits claimed from the major projects challenged the resettlement and
rehabilitation packages for project affected people of the reservoir submergence and canal affected
zones and its implementation It also rejected the environmental impact assessments made and the
remedial actions taken by the project authorities This challenge created worldwide attention to the
major development activity planned in the valley It urged the World Bank to withdraw from the
project and the intense world wide pressure resulted in the Bank mounting an Independent Review
Mission (IRM) called the Morse Mission to review the SSP But the IRMrsquos report was neither
accepted by the Government of India or the World Bank Finally Government of India decided to
terminate further drawals from a remaining $180 million World Bank credit from the Bank with the
firm resolution that the project would be completed within the national resources
The Supreme Court has also deliberated on this issue for several years but finally upheld the Tribunal
Award and allowed the construction to proceed subject to conditions The Court introduced a
mechanism to monitor the progress of resettlement pari-passu with the raising of the height of the
dam through Grievance Redressal Authorities (GRA) in each of the party states The courtrsquos decision
referred in this document given in the year 2000 after 7 years of deliberations has paved the way
for completing the project to attain full envisaged benefits Some of the courtrsquos decisions are
essential to be quoted here (quoted in italics) to set at rest many of the distorted or incorrect
versions being presented in several of the linked Wikipedia articles on this subject
The overall plan for development ultimately conceived involves 30 major dams including Sardar
Sarovar (21 irrigation 5 hydropower and 4 multipurpose) some 135 medium dams and over three
minor dams in MP along the main stem of the river and its 41 tributaries to utilize its allocated share
of 1825 MAF before 2025 (within 45 years of the NWDT award) In addition to power generation
and irrigation within the basin water was allocated for domestic and industrial water uses and for
multipurpose trans-basin diversions to Son and Tons basins in eastern MP drought prone areas of
Saurashtra Kutch northern mainland in Gujarat and southern Rajasthan Irrigation benefits to the
extent of about 40000 to 50000 kmsup2 (of drought prone and scarcity areas) and power generation of
2600 MW were also envisaged Thus the Narmada river development is envisaged as a multi state
program for development of hydropower and irrigation dams and their associated irrigation
networks
Justice Bharucha stated that Considering the magnitude of rehabilitation involving a large
percentage of tribals loss of extensive forest area rich in biological diversity enormous
environmental cost of the project and considering the fact that the basic data on vital aspects are
still not available there could be but one conclusion that the project(s) are not ready for approval
Sardar Sarovar Project (SSP) at Navagam Subsequent to the Tribunal award and approval to the
project in 1987 by the Ministry of Water Resources with due clearances from the MoEampF
implementation of the SSP was taken up as the terminal project on the main stem of the Narmada
in Gujarat to utilize the share of allocated water to Gujarat and Rajasthan The concrete gravity dam
of 1210 m length and 163 m height above foundation with storage capacity of 77 million acre -feet
and reservoir length of 213 m extending into Gujarat Maharashtra and Madhya Pradesh is designed
to provide an annual irrigation of 18000 kmsup2 in Gujarat (covering 3360 villages of 62 talukas in 14
districts) 4260 kmsup2 in Rajasthan and hydel power generation of 1450 MW As a result of
construction of the dam over 48269 families (against 7000 families assessed in 1979 by the
Tribunal) will be affected as per the latest figures of NCA in the three States spread over 244
villages (4 fully and 240 partially - 39369 in MP in 192 villages 4163 in Maharshtra in 33 villages and
4737 in Gujarat in 19 villages) the total area affected being 37533 kmsup2 The submergence area is
broadly divided into two areas fully tribal area which covers the initial reach of about 100 or so
villages which are almost 100 tribal and hilly These include al l the 33 villages of Maharashtra (in
Nadurbar district) all 19 of Gujarat and many of the Madhya Pradesh The second part of the
submergence area is the mixed population area on the Nimad plains with a very well developed
economy that is well connected to the mainstream Considered as the largest water resources
project of India in terms of benefits some of the special features of the project are the following
Damrsquos spillway discharging capacity (307 million cusecs) is the 3rd highest in the world
With 1133 msup3s (40000 ftsup3s) capacity at the head regulator and 532 km length (458 km in
Gujarat and 74 km in Rajasthan) with 75000 km length of distribution system including field
channel the Narmada Main Canal is the largest irrigation canal in the world
The project aims at supplying 3571000 msup3day of drinking water (2900000 msup3day for domestic
consumption amp 671000 msup3day for industrial consumption) to 8215 villages amp 135 towns in Gujarat
which are presently suffering from acute shortage of water Also the project aims to provide
drinking water facilities to a population of about 1371000 in 1107 villages amp two towns in Jallore amp
Barmer districts of Rajasthan
Has the lowest ratio of submergence to area irrigated ndash being 165 of CCA against an average of
4 to 5 of other major irrigation projects
All the 6 units of River Bed Power House (RBPH) have been commissioned successfully by June 2006
and are in operation All the five units of Canal Head Power House (CHPH) have been commissioned
successfully by end of December 2004 and are in operation
The construction of the two multipurpose major projects - the Sardar Sarvoar in Gujarat and Indira
Sagar in Madya Pradesh - the two are interdependent to attain full envisaged benefits - is in progress
and substantial partial benefits have already been achieved Hence details of these two projects are
elaborated below
Sardar Sarovar Dam Gujarat partially completed (up to EL12192 m)
Largest lined canal in the World Sardar Sarovar Project
The dam has attained a height of EL12192 m ie the crest level of the spillway The gates are yet to
be erected to attain the FRL of EL 13868 m for which clearance is required from the Supreme Court
after the Grievance Redressal Committee submits its report on completion of R amp R up to that
elevation Top level of dam to be attained is EL 14650 m
The main irrigation canal has been substantially constructed for a length of 357 km Water has been
let into the canal for partial irrigation and water supply needs Further construction is in progress
Indira Sagar Project (ISP) in Madhya Pradesh at Punasa is one of the 30 major projects proposed in
the Narmada basin with the largest storage capacity in the country The project is located near
Punasa village in Khandwa District of Madhya Pradesh This Multipurpose River Valley Project
envisages construction of a concrete gravity dam 653 m long and 92 m high with gross storage
capacity of the reservoir of 1222 kmsup3 (99 MAF) and live storage of 975 kmsup3 (79MAF) to provide an
annual irrigation potential of 1690 kmsup2 and generation of 1000 MW of hydropower The project
shall also ensure supply of 006 MAF (74000000 msup3) of drinking water to rural areas in Khandwa
district In accordance with NWDT award an annual regulated flow of 812 MAF (10015 kmsup3) shall
be released to the Sardar Sarovar Project (SSP) ex-Maheshwar Project The operation of Indira Sagar
Project shall be carried out in such a way as to facilitate the regulation of Sardar Sarovar
Indira Sagar dam partially completed in Madhya Pradesh
Indira Sagar canal for irrigation
The dam and the powerhouse have been completed but storage has been restricted up to EL 260 m
under orders of the High Court Jabalpur from RampR consideration All the units of the powerhouse
have been commissioned and generation of power from the 8 units of 125 MW capacity each
commenced from Jan 2004[25]The irrigation component of the project is under a fairly advance
stage of implementation
Other completed and under construction projects Existing irrigation projects in the Narmada are the
1) Matiyari (1992) 2) Rani Avantibai Sagar (1988) 3) Barna (1978) 4) Tawa (1992-93) 5) Sukta
(1984) all in Madhya Pradesh and Karjan project in Gujarat
Projects under implementation are the 1) Bargi diversion 2) Kolar 3) Man 4) Omkareshwar
multipurpose (520 MW ndash commissioned in Nov 2007) and 5) Maheshwar (400 MW)
A large number of medium and small projects have been completed and many more are under
implementation as conceived under the overall Master Plan
Source [34]]
With the establishment of RCS all the dams and the hydroelectrical projects will get sufficient water
from the FPC1 and the West extension of FPC1 in this scenario if the levels of these projects are less
than 500 meters AMSL Problems like lsquohigh the magnitude of rehabilitation involving a large
percentage of tribals loss of extensive forest area rich in biological diversity enormous
environmental cost of the projectrsquo will not appear with RCS and all the states coming under this issue
like Madyapradesh Maharastra Gujarath and Rajastan will get more than sufficient water for
irrigation ndash industry ndash hydroelectrical projects ndash for domestic purposes
The cost will be less since (1) it involves only the creation of primary channel (2) there is no
necessity to construct the dams (3) there is no necessity to rehabilitate the people in a great way
since RCS involves very minimal area (4) no immersion of land like city and forest area in back water
in a bigger way (5) we may be creating U tubes in depressed lands in the course of primary channel
or the bi dam in a minimally depressed area but there is no back water issues in these and hence
land involved and rehabilitation are going to be less
All the water are used effectively and no water will enter the Arabian sea without being used
effectively over the land that is the more water generated beyond the storing capacity of the dam in
the rainy seasons will be effectively utilized all over the nation in the lands below 500 mts AMSL
65 FampF ndashWater dispute ndash Height of almatti dam
[Water disputes
Height of almatti dam
State gets a good deal Tribunal gives nod to raise Almatti dam height to 52425 meters
New Delhi In what could be a major relief to Karnataka the Krishna water disputes tribunal -2 has
allowed the state to build the Almatti dam up to the originally proposed height of 52425 meters
Major decisions Karnataka allowed to increase almatti dam height from 519 meters to 52425
meters Krishna waters decision Implementation Board to be set up will monitor flows Releases to
be monitored every 10 days Karnataka should release 8 to 10 tmc to AP in June and July Award to
come up for review in 2050
Water allocations Total water availability 2293tmc Andrapradesh 1001tmc Karnataka 911tmc
maharastra666tmc
This judgment has been given after 43 years of proceedings Source [37] ]
It is true by increasing the height of the dam from 519 to 52425 mts It is possible to store more
water that we can use it later
But what is the use if we are not getting sufficient water to fill the dam in one rain year As per the
calculation the total available water is 2293 TMC Andrapradesh is more benefitted from this
because there is more land available for agriculture and more population is going to be benefited If
the water generated is less then both the states are under loss The level of water (Height) in the
dam depends on the rain in the catchment area (Inflow) and the utilization in the process of
agriculture and others (out flow) If the inflow is steady throughout the year and the out flow is also
steady then both the states are going to be benefitted If we increase the height of the dam then we
may be storing more water but the back water may immerse more inhabited areas and it may
extend in the neighboring states like maharastra and other interstate issues and problems of
rehabilitation will arise
With RCS all such problems will be solved If we are creating the FPC1 at the level of 500mts AMSL
then the back water in the Almatti dam will raise only up to 500 (exactly 495) mts AMSL Any water
which is more than 500 mts AMSL will enter back in the FPC1 But the almatti dam will always be
able to relaease the water to both Karnataka and Andrapradesh what what ever amount they need
Here the total water availability 2293tmc and the allotted water to Andrapradesh 1001tmc and to
Karnataka is 911tmc Maharastra 666tmc With RCS the total water available becomes 10000 or
even more TMC and the states like Andrapradesh Karnataka and Maharastra can use 2000TMC or
even more if they want because the FPC1 will be continuously filled by the ri vers like Ganga ndash
Yamuna ndash Mahanadhi ndash Narnmada- Godhavari ndash Kaveri ndash and Krishna it iself
Thus we need not increase the height of the almatti dam lsquoin this instance onlyrsquo Increasing the height
of the dam may be the necessity in another instance that we need to discuss as such issues arises
Sources
[34] Britannica Concise Encyclopedia answerscom Wikipedia
[37] Deccan herald Mangalore Friday december31 2010 And Prajavani Kannada daily news paper
Mangalore Friday December 31 2010
Telugu Ganga
Polavaram dam
Nijam Sagar Reservoir
Osman Sagar
Sriram Sagar Reservoir
Lower Maneru Reservoir
Himayath Sagar Reservoir
Dindi Reservoir
Somasila
Gandipalem Reservoir
Dowleswaram Barrage
prakasam barrage
Tatipudi Reservoir
Inchampalli
Pulichintala
Ellammpalli
Singur Dam
Dummagudem
NagarjunaSagar TailPond
Sunkesula
Musi Reservoir
pothireddy padu
Ramagundam Dam
Pranahita Chevella
Intenuka Muriki Kaluva Reservoir
jeri dam
Gujarat
Sardar Sarovar Project on Narmada river
Ukai Dam near Surat
Dharoi Dam on Sabarmati River near Dharoi
Vasana Berej on Sabarmati River near Ahmedabad
Check Dams
Himachal Pradesh+ Punjab
Bhakra Dam on Sutlej river near Nangal
Gobind Sagar
Maharana Pratap Sagar
Pong Dam Reservoir on Beas River near Talwara
Pandoh Dam on Beas River near Mandi
Chamera Dam on Ravi River near Chamba
Nathpa Dam on Sutlej River near Rampur
Jammu and Kashmir
Salal Project
Jharkhand
Maithon Dam
Chandil Dam on Swarnarekha River near Chandil
Karnataka
Hidkal Jalashaya (Dam) across Ghataprabha
Dhupdal Reservior across Ghataprabha
Krishna Raja Sagara Dam
Alamatti Damacross Krishna
Basava Sagara Dam
Linganamakki dam
Supa Dam
Kodasalli Dam
Kadra Dam
Tunga Bhadra Dam
Kabini Reservoir
Harangi Dam
Narayanpur Dam downstream of Alamatti Dam
Garura Dam Krishna River
Hemavathi Reservoir (Gorur Dam)
Naviltheertha Dam across Malaprabha
Nethravathi river
Linganmakki Dam across Sharavathi River
Gajanuru Dam across Tunga river
Lakkavali Dam across Bhadra river
Kerala
Banasura Sagar Dam
Malampuzha Dam
Chalakkudy Dam
Peechi dam
Vazhani dam
Mangalam dam
Mattupetty Dam
Kundala dam in Munnar
Parambikulam Dam
Pothundi Dam
Walayar Dam
Idukki arch dam in idukki
Mullaperiyar Dam
Malankara Dam
Neyyar Dam
Siruvani Dam
Meenkara Dam
Kanjhirapuzha
Chulliyar Dam
Jeevana dam
Madhya Pradesh
Bansagar
Bargi Dam
Barna Dam
Gandhi Sagar dam
Indirasagar
Madikheda Dam
Narmada Dam Project
Rajghat
Tawa Reservoir
halali dam
kolar dam
kerwa dam
Maharashtra
MULA Dam Rahuri - River MULA
Koyna Dam - River Koyna
Jaikwadi
Ujani -River Bhima
Mulshi Dam - River Mula
Khadakwasla - River Mutha
Kolkewadi Dam
Panshet - River Mutha
Radhanagari
Bhatsa
Tansa
Vaitarna
Pawna - River Pawna
Bhandardara
Gangapur Dam Nashik
Ozarkhed Dam Nashik
Karanjwan Dam
Nandur Madhmeshwar Dam
Yeldari on Purna River Near Parbhani
Siddheshwar on Purna River Near Parbhani
Manar On River Manar Near Nanded
Girna On River Girna
Chaskaman On River Bhima Near Rajgurunagar
Pravara On River Godavari
Isapur Dam on River Painganga River
Bhadardara On River Pravara
Meghalaya
Umiam Lake
Orissa
Balimela Reservoir
Hirakud Dam on Mahanadi River near Sambalpur
Balimela Reservoir
Jalaput on Machkund River near Jaypore Koraput District
Indravati Dam on river Indravati in kalahandi district
Salia dam on river Kharkhari in Ganjam District
Tamil Nadu
Aliyar Reservoir
Amaravathi Reservoir
Amaravathi Dam
Anaikuttam Reservoir
Anainaduvu Reservoir
Bhavanisagar Reservoir
Chittar Reservoir
Chittar Reservoir-1
Chittar Reservoir-2
Gatana Reservoir
Golwarpatti Reservoir
Gomukhinadhi Reservoir
Gundar Reservoir
Gunderippalam Reservoir
Kariakoil Reservoir
Karupppanadhi Reservoir
Kelavarapalli Reservoir
Kesarigulihalla Reservoir
Kodaganar Reservoir
Kovilar Reservoir
Krishnagiri Reservoir
Kullursandai Reservoir
Kutharaiyar Reservoir
Lower Nirar Reservoir
Manimukthanadhi Reservoir
Manimuthar Reservoir
Manjalar Reservoir
Marudhanadhi Reservoir
Mettur Dam
Nagavathi Reservoir
Noyyal Oarathuppalayam
Palar Porandalar Reservoir
Pambar Reservoir
Parambikulam Reservoir
Parappalar Reservoir
Pechiparai Reservoir
Periyar Reservoir (Pilavukkal Project)
Periyar Reservoir
Perumpallam Reservoir
Perunchani Reservoir
Peruvaripallam
Ponnaniar Reservoir
Ramanadhi Reservoir
Sathanur Reservoir
Sholayar Reservoir
Siddhamalli Reservoir
Soolagiri chinnar Reservoir
Stanley Reservoir
Thambalahalli Reservoir
Thirumurthi Reservoir
Thoppaiyar Reservoir
Thunakadavu Reservoir
Uppar Reservoir
Upper Nirar Wier
Vaigai Dam
Vaigai Reservoir
Vaniyar Reservoir
Varadamanadhi Reservoir
Varattupallam Reservoir
Vattamalaikarai Odai Reservoir
Vembakottai Reservoir
Vidur Reservoir
Willingdon Reservoir
Uttar Pradesh
Govind Ballabh Pant Sagar on Rihand River in Sonbhadra
Kalagarh Dam on Ramganga River in Kalagarh
Parichha Dam on Betwa River in Parichha (Jhansi District)
List of Dams in Lalitpur District Uttar Pradesh
o (A) Matatila Dam constructed during 1952-1964 on Betwa River in Lalitpur District Uttar Pradesh
Length 630 km Height 3353 Meters Area 20720 Sqkm Storage 113268 Mcm
o (B) Jamni Dam constructed during 1962-1973 on Jamni River in Lalitpur District Uttar Pradesh
Length 640 km Height 1918 Meters Area 414 Sqkm Storage 9289 Mcm
o (C) Rohini Dam constructed during 1976-1984 on Rohini River in Lalitpur District Uttar Pradesh
Length 165km Height 1550 Meters Area 44 Sqkm Storage 1212 Mcm
o (D) Shahzad Dam constructed during 1973-1992 on Shahzad River in Lalitpur District Uttar
Pradesh Length 416 km Height 1800 Meters Area 514 Sqkm Storage 13000 Mcm
o (E) Govind Sagar Dam constructed during 1947-1953 on Shahzad River in Lalitpur District Uttar
Pradesh Length 360 km Height 1829 Meters Area 368 Sqkm Storage 968 Mcm
o (F) Sajnam Dam constructed during 1977-1990 on Sajnam River in Lalitpur District Uttar Pradesh
Length 515 km Height 1878 Meters Area 290 Sqkm Storage 8350 Mcm
o (G) Sukma-Dukma Dam a below water construction on Betwa River near Jhansi District Uttar
Pradesh Length 215 km Height 2078 Meters
Uttarakhand
Tehri dam
Dhauli ganga dam
Sriram Sagar
Devadula Lift Irrigation Project
Kaddam
Manjira Reservoir
Lower Tirna
Purna
Upper PenGanga
Lower Dudhana
Jayakwadi Dam
Bhandara Reservoir
Mula Reservoir
Upper Pravara
Upper Indravati Project
Godavari Canal
Upper WainGanga
Majalgaon irrigation project is located in the Godavari river basin in the state of Maharashtra
West Bengal
Panchet Dam
Dam projects
Narmada Dam Project
Banasura Sagar Dam - Banasurasagar Project
Noyyal River - Tanks System
Farakka Barrage
Source [34] ]
All the dams and the areas which are below the level of 500mts AMSL except in the states of Jammu
and Kashmir Northestern states will get the water form RCS and the principle feeders will be the
Ganga and the Yamuna
All the dams and the areas which are below the level of 300mts AMSL except in the states of Jammu
and Kashmir Northestern states will get the water form RCS and the principle feeders will be the
Brahamaputra for the RCS
All the dams and the areas which are below the level of 900mts AMSL in south deccan platue
especially the southern districts of Karnataka western districts of Andra Pradesh and Tamilnadu will
get the water from the RCS and the principle feeders will be the River Kavery
All the dams and the areas which are below the level of 800mts AMSL in north India like states of
Punjab Haryana Himachal Pradesh Delhi northern district of Uttarpradesh Bihar which are north
to the course of Ganga and Yamuna will get the water from the RCS and the principle feeders will be
the Ganaga and Yamuna Rivers
62 FampF ndash Projects across River kosi [Kosi River
Development scenario
Multipurpose projects
After India attained independence in August 1947 the development scenario in India has been
resolute on technological development In keeping with this approach the National Flood Control
Policy in 1954 (following the disastrous floods of 1954 in a large part of the Koshi river basin) stated
that floods could be controlled through a series of flood protection works like dams embankments
and river training works One such work which drew the immediate attention of the policy planners
after independence was a solution to the recurring flood menace faced by people of North Bihar due
to the Kosi and other rivers flowing from Nepal to India The Kosi project was thus conceptualized
(based on investigations between 1946 to 1955) in three continuous interlinked stages ndash the first
was a barrage to anchor this wayward river that had migrated about 120 km (75 mi) westward in the
last 250 years laying waste to a huge tract in north Bihar and to provide irrigation and power
benefits to Nepal and India The second part was to build embankments both below and above the
barrage so as to jacket the river within the defined channel The third part envisaged a high
multipurpose dam within Nepal at Barakshetra to provide substantial flood cushion along with large
irrigation and power benefits to both countries This was followed up by signing of the Kosi
Agreement between Nepal and India on 25 April 1954 and which was revised on 19 December 1966
to address the concerns of Nepal Further letters of Exchange to the Agreement between the two
countries provided for additional schemes for providing benefits of irri gation While the first two
parts of the concept plan have been implemented at the cost of the Government of India the third
part namely the Koshi High dam the kingpin of the whole concept for various political reasons
precluded any action for several years but has since been revived under a fresh agreement in a
modified form for further investigations and studies
Details of the above projects are elaborated below
Kosi barrage and irrigation
Kosi Barrage also called Bhimnagar Barrage after the name of the place where it was built between
the years 1959 and 1963 straddles the Indo-Nepal border It is an irrigation flood control and
hydropower generation project on the Kosi river built under a bilateral agreement between Nepal
and India the entire cost of the project was borne by India The catchment area of the river is
61788 km2 (23856 sq mi) in Nepal at the Barrage site The highest peaks ndash the Mount Everest and
the Mount Kanchenjunga mdash lie in its catchment About 10 of this catchment is snow-fed The
Eastern Canal and the Western Canal taking off from the barrage have been designed for a discharge
capacity of 455 cubic metres per second (16100 cu fts) to irrigate 6125 square kilometres
(1514000 acres) and 210 cubic metres per second (7400 cu fts) to irrigate 35661 square
kilometres (881200 acres) respectively A hydropower plant has been built on the Eastern Canal at
a canal drop (36 km (22 mi) from the Koshi Barrage) to generate 20 MW The Western Kosi Canal
provides irrigation to 250 square kilometres (62000 acres) in Nepal A valuable bridge over the
barrage opened up the East-West highway in the eastern sector of Nepal
An inundation canal taking off at Chatra where the Kosi debouches into the plains has been built to
irrigate a gross area of 860 kmsup2 in Nepal The project has been renovated with IDA assistance after
Nepal took over the project in 1976
Silt deposition near Kosi embankment at Navbhata Saharsa Bihar India
Kosi embankment system
The Kosi barrage with earth dams across river afflux bunds and embankments above and below the
river confines the river to flow within embankments Embankments on both sides downstream of
the barrage with a length of 246 km (153 mi) has been constructed to check the westward
movement of the river The embankments have been kept wide apart about 12 to 16 km (99 mi) to
serve as a silt trap
Sapta Kosi High Multipurpose Project (Indo-Nepal)
Government of India (GOI) and His Majestys Government of Nepal (HMGN) have agreed to conduct
joint investigations and other studies for the preparation of Detailed Project Report (DPR) of Sapta
Kosi High Dam Multipurpose Project and Sun Kosi Storage-cum-Diversion Scheme to meet the
objectives of both the countries for Development of a) hydropower generation b) irrigation c) flood
controlmanagement and d) navigation
A 269-metre (880 ft) high concreteRock fill dam on the Sapta Koshi River with a dam toe
underground power house with an installed capacity of 3000 MW at 50 load factor a barrage on
river Sapta Kosi about 8 km (50 mi) downstream of Sapta Kosi High Dam to re-regulate the water
being released from the Sapta Koshi dam with two canals Eastern Chhatra Canal and Western
Chhatra Canal off-taking from the either bank from barrage site to provide water for irrigation both
in Nepal and India and Navigation through Koshi up to Kursela and also in the reservoir of Sapta
Koshi dam are envisaged
A Power Canal off-taking from the Eastern Chatra Canal is proposed for conveying the water
required for irrigation at existing Kosi barrage at Hanuman Nagar and also the water which may be
required downstream of Hanuman Nagar Barrage for the purpose of navigation To utilize the head
available between Chatra and Hanuman Nagar barrages for power generation three canal Power
Houses each of 100 MW installed capacity are also proposed on power canal
Necessary cushion in storage capacity of Sapta Kosi High Dam would be provided to moderate the
flood downstream of dam
Chatra Canal System would provide irrigation to large areas in Nepal and India (particularly in Bihar)
A Joint Project Office (JPO) has been set up in Nepal for investigation of the project
Hydropower
Nepal has a total estimated potential of 83290 MW out of which economically exploitable potential
is 42140 MW The Koshi river basin contributes 22350 MW of this potential(360 MW from small
schemes and 1875 MW from major schemes) and the economically exploitable potential is assessd
as 10860 MW (includes the Sapta Koshi Multipurpose Project [3300MW] mentioned above) Source [34]]
Damages to the canal ndash embankment ndash hydroelectrical projects are the possibilities if we create the
projects at places where we can expect high flow in short time of period It is better to target the
water at higher level before they unite and form big volume of water at one point
63 FampF ndash Irrigation projects along the river Godavari
[Godavari River Basin Irrigation Projects
Godavari River Delta
The Godavari River has its catchment area in five states of India Maharashtra Chattisgarh Madhya
Pradesh Andhra Pradesh Karnataka and Orissa
Dowleswaram Barrage
Jalaput
Balimela Reservoir
Upper Indravati
Nizam Sagar
Dams and bridges along the river
A barrage was built on the river at Dowleswaram was built by Sir Arthur Cotton in 1850 It was
rebuilt as a barrage and roadway during 1980s and named after him The roadway connects
Dowleswaram in East Godavari and Vijjeswaram in West Godavari
There is also a big dam built just after the source of the river at Trimbakeshwar The dam is in the
town of Gangapur which literally means a town on a river The dam provides drinking water to the
residents of Nashik and also supplies water to the thermal power station situated downstream at
Eklahara which provides power to the town
There is another multipurpose project on the Godavari River named Sri Ram Sagar Project in
Nizamabad District It is in the town of Pochampad 60km away from Nizamabad It irrigates 4
districts of Northern Telangana Region of Andhra Pradesh and supplies power
The Jayakwadi dam near Paithan is one of the largest earthen dam in India This dam was built to
address the problem of drought in Marathwada region and problem of flood along the bank of river
Two left and right canals provide the irrigation to fertile land up to Nanded district This dam has
major contribution in industrial development of Aurangabad
Source [34]]
All the dams which are at the level of 500mts AMSL will receive the water from FPC1 and thoses at
or below the level of 300mts AMSL will receive the water from FPC4
64 FampF ndash Narmada river water projects
[Narmada River
Narmada river development (NRD)
The Narmada river has a huge water resources potential as much as 3321 MAF (41000 Mcum) of
average annual flow (more than 90 of this flow occurring during the monsoon months of June ndash
September) which according to estimates is greater than the combined annual flows of the Ravi
Beas and the Sutlej rivers which feed the Indus basin The 75 dependable flow is 28 MAF (34537
MCM) Till the beginning of planned development in the country was started in 1946 this huge
potential went almost abegging without any effective utilization thus denying much needed succour
to the drought stricken people of the valley both in Madhya Pradesh and Gujarat Since then plans
have been evolved debated finally legally examined and adjudicated by a tribunal agitated by
NGOs The Supreme Court has finally intervened to ensure that the implementation of the projects is
not halted
Early background and dispute
Investigations for harnessing the Narmada waters started around the time of independence when
Central Waterways Irrigation and Navigation Commission) (CWINC) identified several storage
schemes and in 1948 the Khosla Committee prioritized the proposals and named Tawa Bargi
Punasa and Bharuch projects (the last three on the main stem of the river) for preparation of
reports The reports were ready by 1963 A parallel study of the Hydropower potential identified 16
sites with a potential of 1300 MW While the project in Gujarat called Baruch Weir project (for which
Jawaharlal Nehru laid the foundation stone in 1961) went through a series of modifications and
improvements with a reformed scheme at Navagam village to extend benefits up to the Rann of
Kutch but following the bifurcation of the erstwhile Bombay state into Maharashtra and Gujarat
states and Gujaratrsquos intent to raise the height of the dam at Navagam to maximize storage benefits
at the cost of submergence of potential hydropower sites in Maharashtra and Madhya Pradesh
created a dispute between the states This resulted in an impasse in the implementation o f the
agreed projects at Navagam in Gujarat Punasa in MP and Bargi dam in MP and power benefit
sharing among the states with MP refusing to ratify the agreements To break the logjam a high
level Committee was appointed by the Govt of India in Septembe r 1964 In 1965 the Committee
prepared a Master Plan for the basin which involved construction of 12 major projects in MP and the
Navagam dam in Gujarat It provided irrigation priority over power irrigation of 2630 kmsup2 in MP
400 kmsup2 in Maharashtra 1850 kmsup2 in Gujarat and 4000 kmsup2 in Rajasthan The storages it
recommended in MP involved Bargi Tawa and Narmadasagar (Punasa) while its proposed Navagam
high dam would submerge the hydelpower project sites of Jalasindhi (in Maharshtra) and Harinphal
(MP) but without any more submergence than would be caused by the three dams if separately
constructed Gujarat endorsed this proposal but Maharashtra was not willing to go by it After
intense parleys failed to resolve the problem GOI decided to set up the Narmada Water Disputes
Tribunal (NWDT) in 1969 under the Inter State Water Disputes Act 1956 to adjudicate on the
dispute relating to sharing of water of the inter-state river Narmada and its valley
Tribunal award After ten years of deliberations the Narmada Water Disputes Tribunal (NWDT) gave
its award in December 1979 The NWDT considering the development of the water resources of the
basin as a whole gave its award allocating share of water (after accepting the mutually agreed
settlement among the four party states in 1974 on sharing of the waters of Narmada on the basis
of a determination by the Tribunal of the height of the Navagam dam or the Sardar Sarovar dam)
and Hydro Power of the Sardar Sarovar Project
The Tribunalrsquos final order determined the utilizable quantum of Narmada waters to be 27 million
acre feet at 75 dependability and allocated it to the four states as in Table below including share
of power benefits It also stipulated the share of water when utilizable flow was in excess of 28
million acre feet The Navagam dam height was fixed at FRL 460 feet (140 m) with a maximum water
level of EL feet The Full Supply Level of the Navagam canal was fixed at 300 feet (91 m) The cost
sharing formula among the states and the consequent requirement of release of regulated releases
from the Narmada Sagar dam by MP was also spelt out The resettlement and rehabilitation package
was also clearly specified with all costs to be borne by Gujarat for all resettlement and rehabilitation
work of people affected in the three states and also for relocating any ancient or historic
monuments places of worship or idols likely to suffer submergence
Party state Alloted share of
water in million
acre feet (MAF)
share of
power
Madya Pradesh 1825 57
Gujarath 9 16
Maharastra 025 27
Rajastan 05 Nil
Total 28 100
The uniqueness of this Award is that a non riparian state ndash Rajasthan ndash has been allocated a share of
Narmada waters for meeting the water requirements of the drought prone districts of Barmer and
Jalore which have no other source of dependable water
Go ahead for the projects The work on the project did not start soon since extensive studies were
undertaken for project designing and with World Bank getting involved with funding studies and
project costs (Loan agreement with GOI of $450 million was signed in May 1985) the Resettlement
and Rehabilitation package was substantially revised over and above what was set in the NWDT
and environmental studies had to be undertaken But the environmental and forest cle arances for
the projects from the newly formed Ministry of Environment and Forests (MoEampF) involved
extensive inter-ministerial and inter departmental discussions (within the central govt and with state
govts) for a substantial period and it was only in June 1987 (almost 8 years after the NWDT award
was given in Dec 1979) that the MoEampF gave a conditional approval to the Sardar Sarovar and
Narmada Sagar Projects The Forest clearance was given in September 1987 for Sardar Sarovar only
The clearance also required the work to be done pari passu with the construction of the dams and
the filling of the reservoir In the mean time the Narmada Control Authority (NCA) an inter-State
Administrative Authority and the Sardar Sarovar Construction Advisory Committee (SSCAC) were set
up in 1980 by the Govt of India in compliance of the NWDT award the former organization was set
up in Dec 1980 as body corporate with representatives from the four party states and Govt of India
as a machinery to implement the decisions and directions of the NWDT and the later organization
was set up in Sept 1980 as a statutory body to ensure efficient economical and timely execution of
the Unit I (Dam amp appurtenant works) and Unit III (Hydropower works) of the Sardar Sarovar Project
(SSP) A Review Committee consisting of the Union Minister for Irrigation (now substituted by Union
Minister for Water Resources) as its Chairperson and the Chief Ministers of Madhya Pradesh
Maharashtra Gujarat and Rajasthan as its members is also in position to review the decisions of the
NCA and the SSCAC as required For monitoring and implementation of various environmental
activities effectively independent machinery of Environment Sub-Group is functioning since
Nov1987 under NCA Similarly for monitoring the progress of the resettlement and rehabilitation of
project affected people RampR subgroup is also functioning under the NCA At the state level Sardar
Sarovar Narmada Nigam Limited (SSNL) in Gujarat has the mandate to implement and manage the
Sardar Sarovar multipurpose project In Madhya Pradesh the Narmada Valley Development
Authority (NVDA) is vested the responsibility for implementation of the projects
Narmada River
Layout of Water Resources Development Projects in the Narmada Basin in Gujarat amp Madhya
Pradesh
Even though the tribunal award resolved the initial issue of water sharing however the height of
dam benefit sharing and the mode of settlement of project-affected people caused serious
difficulties in implementation particularly of the Sardar Sarovar dam (the terminal dam on the river)
Project-affected people agitated under the banner of the dedicated NGO - The Narmada Bachao
Andolan (NBA) The NBA followed up by Public Interest Litigation (PIL) in the Supreme Court The
NBA questioned the benefits claimed from the major projects challenged the resettlement and
rehabilitation packages for project affected people of the reservoir submergence and canal affected
zones and its implementation It also rejected the environmental impact assessments made and the
remedial actions taken by the project authorities This challenge created worldwide attention to the
major development activity planned in the valley It urged the World Bank to withdraw from the
project and the intense world wide pressure resulted in the Bank mounting an Independent Review
Mission (IRM) called the Morse Mission to review the SSP But the IRMrsquos report was neither
accepted by the Government of India or the World Bank Finally Government of India decided to
terminate further drawals from a remaining $180 million World Bank credit from the Bank with the
firm resolution that the project would be completed within the national resources
The Supreme Court has also deliberated on this issue for several years but finally upheld the Tribunal
Award and allowed the construction to proceed subject to conditions The Court introduced a
mechanism to monitor the progress of resettlement pari-passu with the raising of the height of the
dam through Grievance Redressal Authorities (GRA) in each of the party states The courtrsquos decision
referred in this document given in the year 2000 after 7 years of deliberations has paved the way
for completing the project to attain full envisaged benefits Some of the courtrsquos decisions are
essential to be quoted here (quoted in italics) to set at rest many of the distorted or incorrect
versions being presented in several of the linked Wikipedia articles on this subject
The overall plan for development ultimately conceived involves 30 major dams including Sardar
Sarovar (21 irrigation 5 hydropower and 4 multipurpose) some 135 medium dams and over three
minor dams in MP along the main stem of the river and its 41 tributaries to utilize its allocated share
of 1825 MAF before 2025 (within 45 years of the NWDT award) In addition to power generation
and irrigation within the basin water was allocated for domestic and industrial water uses and for
multipurpose trans-basin diversions to Son and Tons basins in eastern MP drought prone areas of
Saurashtra Kutch northern mainland in Gujarat and southern Rajasthan Irrigation benefits to the
extent of about 40000 to 50000 kmsup2 (of drought prone and scarcity areas) and power generation of
2600 MW were also envisaged Thus the Narmada river development is envisaged as a multi state
program for development of hydropower and irrigation dams and their associated irrigation
networks
Justice Bharucha stated that Considering the magnitude of rehabilitation involving a large
percentage of tribals loss of extensive forest area rich in biological diversity enormous
environmental cost of the project and considering the fact that the basic data on vital aspects are
still not available there could be but one conclusion that the project(s) are not ready for approval
Sardar Sarovar Project (SSP) at Navagam Subsequent to the Tribunal award and approval to the
project in 1987 by the Ministry of Water Resources with due clearances from the MoEampF
implementation of the SSP was taken up as the terminal project on the main stem of the Narmada
in Gujarat to utilize the share of allocated water to Gujarat and Rajasthan The concrete gravity dam
of 1210 m length and 163 m height above foundation with storage capacity of 77 million acre -feet
and reservoir length of 213 m extending into Gujarat Maharashtra and Madhya Pradesh is designed
to provide an annual irrigation of 18000 kmsup2 in Gujarat (covering 3360 villages of 62 talukas in 14
districts) 4260 kmsup2 in Rajasthan and hydel power generation of 1450 MW As a result of
construction of the dam over 48269 families (against 7000 families assessed in 1979 by the
Tribunal) will be affected as per the latest figures of NCA in the three States spread over 244
villages (4 fully and 240 partially - 39369 in MP in 192 villages 4163 in Maharshtra in 33 villages and
4737 in Gujarat in 19 villages) the total area affected being 37533 kmsup2 The submergence area is
broadly divided into two areas fully tribal area which covers the initial reach of about 100 or so
villages which are almost 100 tribal and hilly These include al l the 33 villages of Maharashtra (in
Nadurbar district) all 19 of Gujarat and many of the Madhya Pradesh The second part of the
submergence area is the mixed population area on the Nimad plains with a very well developed
economy that is well connected to the mainstream Considered as the largest water resources
project of India in terms of benefits some of the special features of the project are the following
Damrsquos spillway discharging capacity (307 million cusecs) is the 3rd highest in the world
With 1133 msup3s (40000 ftsup3s) capacity at the head regulator and 532 km length (458 km in
Gujarat and 74 km in Rajasthan) with 75000 km length of distribution system including field
channel the Narmada Main Canal is the largest irrigation canal in the world
The project aims at supplying 3571000 msup3day of drinking water (2900000 msup3day for domestic
consumption amp 671000 msup3day for industrial consumption) to 8215 villages amp 135 towns in Gujarat
which are presently suffering from acute shortage of water Also the project aims to provide
drinking water facilities to a population of about 1371000 in 1107 villages amp two towns in Jallore amp
Barmer districts of Rajasthan
Has the lowest ratio of submergence to area irrigated ndash being 165 of CCA against an average of
4 to 5 of other major irrigation projects
All the 6 units of River Bed Power House (RBPH) have been commissioned successfully by June 2006
and are in operation All the five units of Canal Head Power House (CHPH) have been commissioned
successfully by end of December 2004 and are in operation
The construction of the two multipurpose major projects - the Sardar Sarvoar in Gujarat and Indira
Sagar in Madya Pradesh - the two are interdependent to attain full envisaged benefits - is in progress
and substantial partial benefits have already been achieved Hence details of these two projects are
elaborated below
Sardar Sarovar Dam Gujarat partially completed (up to EL12192 m)
Largest lined canal in the World Sardar Sarovar Project
The dam has attained a height of EL12192 m ie the crest level of the spillway The gates are yet to
be erected to attain the FRL of EL 13868 m for which clearance is required from the Supreme Court
after the Grievance Redressal Committee submits its report on completion of R amp R up to that
elevation Top level of dam to be attained is EL 14650 m
The main irrigation canal has been substantially constructed for a length of 357 km Water has been
let into the canal for partial irrigation and water supply needs Further construction is in progress
Indira Sagar Project (ISP) in Madhya Pradesh at Punasa is one of the 30 major projects proposed in
the Narmada basin with the largest storage capacity in the country The project is located near
Punasa village in Khandwa District of Madhya Pradesh This Multipurpose River Valley Project
envisages construction of a concrete gravity dam 653 m long and 92 m high with gross storage
capacity of the reservoir of 1222 kmsup3 (99 MAF) and live storage of 975 kmsup3 (79MAF) to provide an
annual irrigation potential of 1690 kmsup2 and generation of 1000 MW of hydropower The project
shall also ensure supply of 006 MAF (74000000 msup3) of drinking water to rural areas in Khandwa
district In accordance with NWDT award an annual regulated flow of 812 MAF (10015 kmsup3) shall
be released to the Sardar Sarovar Project (SSP) ex-Maheshwar Project The operation of Indira Sagar
Project shall be carried out in such a way as to facilitate the regulation of Sardar Sarovar
Indira Sagar dam partially completed in Madhya Pradesh
Indira Sagar canal for irrigation
The dam and the powerhouse have been completed but storage has been restricted up to EL 260 m
under orders of the High Court Jabalpur from RampR consideration All the units of the powerhouse
have been commissioned and generation of power from the 8 units of 125 MW capacity each
commenced from Jan 2004[25]The irrigation component of the project is under a fairly advance
stage of implementation
Other completed and under construction projects Existing irrigation projects in the Narmada are the
1) Matiyari (1992) 2) Rani Avantibai Sagar (1988) 3) Barna (1978) 4) Tawa (1992-93) 5) Sukta
(1984) all in Madhya Pradesh and Karjan project in Gujarat
Projects under implementation are the 1) Bargi diversion 2) Kolar 3) Man 4) Omkareshwar
multipurpose (520 MW ndash commissioned in Nov 2007) and 5) Maheshwar (400 MW)
A large number of medium and small projects have been completed and many more are under
implementation as conceived under the overall Master Plan
Source [34]]
With the establishment of RCS all the dams and the hydroelectrical projects will get sufficient water
from the FPC1 and the West extension of FPC1 in this scenario if the levels of these projects are less
than 500 meters AMSL Problems like lsquohigh the magnitude of rehabilitation involving a large
percentage of tribals loss of extensive forest area rich in biological diversity enormous
environmental cost of the projectrsquo will not appear with RCS and all the states coming under this issue
like Madyapradesh Maharastra Gujarath and Rajastan will get more than sufficient water for
irrigation ndash industry ndash hydroelectrical projects ndash for domestic purposes
The cost will be less since (1) it involves only the creation of primary channel (2) there is no
necessity to construct the dams (3) there is no necessity to rehabilitate the people in a great way
since RCS involves very minimal area (4) no immersion of land like city and forest area in back water
in a bigger way (5) we may be creating U tubes in depressed lands in the course of primary channel
or the bi dam in a minimally depressed area but there is no back water issues in these and hence
land involved and rehabilitation are going to be less
All the water are used effectively and no water will enter the Arabian sea without being used
effectively over the land that is the more water generated beyond the storing capacity of the dam in
the rainy seasons will be effectively utilized all over the nation in the lands below 500 mts AMSL
65 FampF ndashWater dispute ndash Height of almatti dam
[Water disputes
Height of almatti dam
State gets a good deal Tribunal gives nod to raise Almatti dam height to 52425 meters
New Delhi In what could be a major relief to Karnataka the Krishna water disputes tribunal -2 has
allowed the state to build the Almatti dam up to the originally proposed height of 52425 meters
Major decisions Karnataka allowed to increase almatti dam height from 519 meters to 52425
meters Krishna waters decision Implementation Board to be set up will monitor flows Releases to
be monitored every 10 days Karnataka should release 8 to 10 tmc to AP in June and July Award to
come up for review in 2050
Water allocations Total water availability 2293tmc Andrapradesh 1001tmc Karnataka 911tmc
maharastra666tmc
This judgment has been given after 43 years of proceedings Source [37] ]
It is true by increasing the height of the dam from 519 to 52425 mts It is possible to store more
water that we can use it later
But what is the use if we are not getting sufficient water to fill the dam in one rain year As per the
calculation the total available water is 2293 TMC Andrapradesh is more benefitted from this
because there is more land available for agriculture and more population is going to be benefited If
the water generated is less then both the states are under loss The level of water (Height) in the
dam depends on the rain in the catchment area (Inflow) and the utilization in the process of
agriculture and others (out flow) If the inflow is steady throughout the year and the out flow is also
steady then both the states are going to be benefitted If we increase the height of the dam then we
may be storing more water but the back water may immerse more inhabited areas and it may
extend in the neighboring states like maharastra and other interstate issues and problems of
rehabilitation will arise
With RCS all such problems will be solved If we are creating the FPC1 at the level of 500mts AMSL
then the back water in the Almatti dam will raise only up to 500 (exactly 495) mts AMSL Any water
which is more than 500 mts AMSL will enter back in the FPC1 But the almatti dam will always be
able to relaease the water to both Karnataka and Andrapradesh what what ever amount they need
Here the total water availability 2293tmc and the allotted water to Andrapradesh 1001tmc and to
Karnataka is 911tmc Maharastra 666tmc With RCS the total water available becomes 10000 or
even more TMC and the states like Andrapradesh Karnataka and Maharastra can use 2000TMC or
even more if they want because the FPC1 will be continuously filled by the ri vers like Ganga ndash
Yamuna ndash Mahanadhi ndash Narnmada- Godhavari ndash Kaveri ndash and Krishna it iself
Thus we need not increase the height of the almatti dam lsquoin this instance onlyrsquo Increasing the height
of the dam may be the necessity in another instance that we need to discuss as such issues arises
Sources
[34] Britannica Concise Encyclopedia answerscom Wikipedia
[37] Deccan herald Mangalore Friday december31 2010 And Prajavani Kannada daily news paper
Mangalore Friday December 31 2010
Jammu and Kashmir
Salal Project
Jharkhand
Maithon Dam
Chandil Dam on Swarnarekha River near Chandil
Karnataka
Hidkal Jalashaya (Dam) across Ghataprabha
Dhupdal Reservior across Ghataprabha
Krishna Raja Sagara Dam
Alamatti Damacross Krishna
Basava Sagara Dam
Linganamakki dam
Supa Dam
Kodasalli Dam
Kadra Dam
Tunga Bhadra Dam
Kabini Reservoir
Harangi Dam
Narayanpur Dam downstream of Alamatti Dam
Garura Dam Krishna River
Hemavathi Reservoir (Gorur Dam)
Naviltheertha Dam across Malaprabha
Nethravathi river
Linganmakki Dam across Sharavathi River
Gajanuru Dam across Tunga river
Lakkavali Dam across Bhadra river
Kerala
Banasura Sagar Dam
Malampuzha Dam
Chalakkudy Dam
Peechi dam
Vazhani dam
Mangalam dam
Mattupetty Dam
Kundala dam in Munnar
Parambikulam Dam
Pothundi Dam
Walayar Dam
Idukki arch dam in idukki
Mullaperiyar Dam
Malankara Dam
Neyyar Dam
Siruvani Dam
Meenkara Dam
Kanjhirapuzha
Chulliyar Dam
Jeevana dam
Madhya Pradesh
Bansagar
Bargi Dam
Barna Dam
Gandhi Sagar dam
Indirasagar
Madikheda Dam
Narmada Dam Project
Rajghat
Tawa Reservoir
halali dam
kolar dam
kerwa dam
Maharashtra
MULA Dam Rahuri - River MULA
Koyna Dam - River Koyna
Jaikwadi
Ujani -River Bhima
Mulshi Dam - River Mula
Khadakwasla - River Mutha
Kolkewadi Dam
Panshet - River Mutha
Radhanagari
Bhatsa
Tansa
Vaitarna
Pawna - River Pawna
Bhandardara
Gangapur Dam Nashik
Ozarkhed Dam Nashik
Karanjwan Dam
Nandur Madhmeshwar Dam
Yeldari on Purna River Near Parbhani
Siddheshwar on Purna River Near Parbhani
Manar On River Manar Near Nanded
Girna On River Girna
Chaskaman On River Bhima Near Rajgurunagar
Pravara On River Godavari
Isapur Dam on River Painganga River
Bhadardara On River Pravara
Meghalaya
Umiam Lake
Orissa
Balimela Reservoir
Hirakud Dam on Mahanadi River near Sambalpur
Balimela Reservoir
Jalaput on Machkund River near Jaypore Koraput District
Indravati Dam on river Indravati in kalahandi district
Salia dam on river Kharkhari in Ganjam District
Tamil Nadu
Aliyar Reservoir
Amaravathi Reservoir
Amaravathi Dam
Anaikuttam Reservoir
Anainaduvu Reservoir
Bhavanisagar Reservoir
Chittar Reservoir
Chittar Reservoir-1
Chittar Reservoir-2
Gatana Reservoir
Golwarpatti Reservoir
Gomukhinadhi Reservoir
Gundar Reservoir
Gunderippalam Reservoir
Kariakoil Reservoir
Karupppanadhi Reservoir
Kelavarapalli Reservoir
Kesarigulihalla Reservoir
Kodaganar Reservoir
Kovilar Reservoir
Krishnagiri Reservoir
Kullursandai Reservoir
Kutharaiyar Reservoir
Lower Nirar Reservoir
Manimukthanadhi Reservoir
Manimuthar Reservoir
Manjalar Reservoir
Marudhanadhi Reservoir
Mettur Dam
Nagavathi Reservoir
Noyyal Oarathuppalayam
Palar Porandalar Reservoir
Pambar Reservoir
Parambikulam Reservoir
Parappalar Reservoir
Pechiparai Reservoir
Periyar Reservoir (Pilavukkal Project)
Periyar Reservoir
Perumpallam Reservoir
Perunchani Reservoir
Peruvaripallam
Ponnaniar Reservoir
Ramanadhi Reservoir
Sathanur Reservoir
Sholayar Reservoir
Siddhamalli Reservoir
Soolagiri chinnar Reservoir
Stanley Reservoir
Thambalahalli Reservoir
Thirumurthi Reservoir
Thoppaiyar Reservoir
Thunakadavu Reservoir
Uppar Reservoir
Upper Nirar Wier
Vaigai Dam
Vaigai Reservoir
Vaniyar Reservoir
Varadamanadhi Reservoir
Varattupallam Reservoir
Vattamalaikarai Odai Reservoir
Vembakottai Reservoir
Vidur Reservoir
Willingdon Reservoir
Uttar Pradesh
Govind Ballabh Pant Sagar on Rihand River in Sonbhadra
Kalagarh Dam on Ramganga River in Kalagarh
Parichha Dam on Betwa River in Parichha (Jhansi District)
List of Dams in Lalitpur District Uttar Pradesh
o (A) Matatila Dam constructed during 1952-1964 on Betwa River in Lalitpur District Uttar Pradesh
Length 630 km Height 3353 Meters Area 20720 Sqkm Storage 113268 Mcm
o (B) Jamni Dam constructed during 1962-1973 on Jamni River in Lalitpur District Uttar Pradesh
Length 640 km Height 1918 Meters Area 414 Sqkm Storage 9289 Mcm
o (C) Rohini Dam constructed during 1976-1984 on Rohini River in Lalitpur District Uttar Pradesh
Length 165km Height 1550 Meters Area 44 Sqkm Storage 1212 Mcm
o (D) Shahzad Dam constructed during 1973-1992 on Shahzad River in Lalitpur District Uttar
Pradesh Length 416 km Height 1800 Meters Area 514 Sqkm Storage 13000 Mcm
o (E) Govind Sagar Dam constructed during 1947-1953 on Shahzad River in Lalitpur District Uttar
Pradesh Length 360 km Height 1829 Meters Area 368 Sqkm Storage 968 Mcm
o (F) Sajnam Dam constructed during 1977-1990 on Sajnam River in Lalitpur District Uttar Pradesh
Length 515 km Height 1878 Meters Area 290 Sqkm Storage 8350 Mcm
o (G) Sukma-Dukma Dam a below water construction on Betwa River near Jhansi District Uttar
Pradesh Length 215 km Height 2078 Meters
Uttarakhand
Tehri dam
Dhauli ganga dam
Sriram Sagar
Devadula Lift Irrigation Project
Kaddam
Manjira Reservoir
Lower Tirna
Purna
Upper PenGanga
Lower Dudhana
Jayakwadi Dam
Bhandara Reservoir
Mula Reservoir
Upper Pravara
Upper Indravati Project
Godavari Canal
Upper WainGanga
Majalgaon irrigation project is located in the Godavari river basin in the state of Maharashtra
West Bengal
Panchet Dam
Dam projects
Narmada Dam Project
Banasura Sagar Dam - Banasurasagar Project
Noyyal River - Tanks System
Farakka Barrage
Source [34] ]
All the dams and the areas which are below the level of 500mts AMSL except in the states of Jammu
and Kashmir Northestern states will get the water form RCS and the principle feeders will be the
Ganga and the Yamuna
All the dams and the areas which are below the level of 300mts AMSL except in the states of Jammu
and Kashmir Northestern states will get the water form RCS and the principle feeders will be the
Brahamaputra for the RCS
All the dams and the areas which are below the level of 900mts AMSL in south deccan platue
especially the southern districts of Karnataka western districts of Andra Pradesh and Tamilnadu will
get the water from the RCS and the principle feeders will be the River Kavery
All the dams and the areas which are below the level of 800mts AMSL in north India like states of
Punjab Haryana Himachal Pradesh Delhi northern district of Uttarpradesh Bihar which are north
to the course of Ganga and Yamuna will get the water from the RCS and the principle feeders will be
the Ganaga and Yamuna Rivers
62 FampF ndash Projects across River kosi [Kosi River
Development scenario
Multipurpose projects
After India attained independence in August 1947 the development scenario in India has been
resolute on technological development In keeping with this approach the National Flood Control
Policy in 1954 (following the disastrous floods of 1954 in a large part of the Koshi river basin) stated
that floods could be controlled through a series of flood protection works like dams embankments
and river training works One such work which drew the immediate attention of the policy planners
after independence was a solution to the recurring flood menace faced by people of North Bihar due
to the Kosi and other rivers flowing from Nepal to India The Kosi project was thus conceptualized
(based on investigations between 1946 to 1955) in three continuous interlinked stages ndash the first
was a barrage to anchor this wayward river that had migrated about 120 km (75 mi) westward in the
last 250 years laying waste to a huge tract in north Bihar and to provide irrigation and power
benefits to Nepal and India The second part was to build embankments both below and above the
barrage so as to jacket the river within the defined channel The third part envisaged a high
multipurpose dam within Nepal at Barakshetra to provide substantial flood cushion along with large
irrigation and power benefits to both countries This was followed up by signing of the Kosi
Agreement between Nepal and India on 25 April 1954 and which was revised on 19 December 1966
to address the concerns of Nepal Further letters of Exchange to the Agreement between the two
countries provided for additional schemes for providing benefits of irri gation While the first two
parts of the concept plan have been implemented at the cost of the Government of India the third
part namely the Koshi High dam the kingpin of the whole concept for various political reasons
precluded any action for several years but has since been revived under a fresh agreement in a
modified form for further investigations and studies
Details of the above projects are elaborated below
Kosi barrage and irrigation
Kosi Barrage also called Bhimnagar Barrage after the name of the place where it was built between
the years 1959 and 1963 straddles the Indo-Nepal border It is an irrigation flood control and
hydropower generation project on the Kosi river built under a bilateral agreement between Nepal
and India the entire cost of the project was borne by India The catchment area of the river is
61788 km2 (23856 sq mi) in Nepal at the Barrage site The highest peaks ndash the Mount Everest and
the Mount Kanchenjunga mdash lie in its catchment About 10 of this catchment is snow-fed The
Eastern Canal and the Western Canal taking off from the barrage have been designed for a discharge
capacity of 455 cubic metres per second (16100 cu fts) to irrigate 6125 square kilometres
(1514000 acres) and 210 cubic metres per second (7400 cu fts) to irrigate 35661 square
kilometres (881200 acres) respectively A hydropower plant has been built on the Eastern Canal at
a canal drop (36 km (22 mi) from the Koshi Barrage) to generate 20 MW The Western Kosi Canal
provides irrigation to 250 square kilometres (62000 acres) in Nepal A valuable bridge over the
barrage opened up the East-West highway in the eastern sector of Nepal
An inundation canal taking off at Chatra where the Kosi debouches into the plains has been built to
irrigate a gross area of 860 kmsup2 in Nepal The project has been renovated with IDA assistance after
Nepal took over the project in 1976
Silt deposition near Kosi embankment at Navbhata Saharsa Bihar India
Kosi embankment system
The Kosi barrage with earth dams across river afflux bunds and embankments above and below the
river confines the river to flow within embankments Embankments on both sides downstream of
the barrage with a length of 246 km (153 mi) has been constructed to check the westward
movement of the river The embankments have been kept wide apart about 12 to 16 km (99 mi) to
serve as a silt trap
Sapta Kosi High Multipurpose Project (Indo-Nepal)
Government of India (GOI) and His Majestys Government of Nepal (HMGN) have agreed to conduct
joint investigations and other studies for the preparation of Detailed Project Report (DPR) of Sapta
Kosi High Dam Multipurpose Project and Sun Kosi Storage-cum-Diversion Scheme to meet the
objectives of both the countries for Development of a) hydropower generation b) irrigation c) flood
controlmanagement and d) navigation
A 269-metre (880 ft) high concreteRock fill dam on the Sapta Koshi River with a dam toe
underground power house with an installed capacity of 3000 MW at 50 load factor a barrage on
river Sapta Kosi about 8 km (50 mi) downstream of Sapta Kosi High Dam to re-regulate the water
being released from the Sapta Koshi dam with two canals Eastern Chhatra Canal and Western
Chhatra Canal off-taking from the either bank from barrage site to provide water for irrigation both
in Nepal and India and Navigation through Koshi up to Kursela and also in the reservoir of Sapta
Koshi dam are envisaged
A Power Canal off-taking from the Eastern Chatra Canal is proposed for conveying the water
required for irrigation at existing Kosi barrage at Hanuman Nagar and also the water which may be
required downstream of Hanuman Nagar Barrage for the purpose of navigation To utilize the head
available between Chatra and Hanuman Nagar barrages for power generation three canal Power
Houses each of 100 MW installed capacity are also proposed on power canal
Necessary cushion in storage capacity of Sapta Kosi High Dam would be provided to moderate the
flood downstream of dam
Chatra Canal System would provide irrigation to large areas in Nepal and India (particularly in Bihar)
A Joint Project Office (JPO) has been set up in Nepal for investigation of the project
Hydropower
Nepal has a total estimated potential of 83290 MW out of which economically exploitable potential
is 42140 MW The Koshi river basin contributes 22350 MW of this potential(360 MW from small
schemes and 1875 MW from major schemes) and the economically exploitable potential is assessd
as 10860 MW (includes the Sapta Koshi Multipurpose Project [3300MW] mentioned above) Source [34]]
Damages to the canal ndash embankment ndash hydroelectrical projects are the possibilities if we create the
projects at places where we can expect high flow in short time of period It is better to target the
water at higher level before they unite and form big volume of water at one point
63 FampF ndash Irrigation projects along the river Godavari
[Godavari River Basin Irrigation Projects
Godavari River Delta
The Godavari River has its catchment area in five states of India Maharashtra Chattisgarh Madhya
Pradesh Andhra Pradesh Karnataka and Orissa
Dowleswaram Barrage
Jalaput
Balimela Reservoir
Upper Indravati
Nizam Sagar
Dams and bridges along the river
A barrage was built on the river at Dowleswaram was built by Sir Arthur Cotton in 1850 It was
rebuilt as a barrage and roadway during 1980s and named after him The roadway connects
Dowleswaram in East Godavari and Vijjeswaram in West Godavari
There is also a big dam built just after the source of the river at Trimbakeshwar The dam is in the
town of Gangapur which literally means a town on a river The dam provides drinking water to the
residents of Nashik and also supplies water to the thermal power station situated downstream at
Eklahara which provides power to the town
There is another multipurpose project on the Godavari River named Sri Ram Sagar Project in
Nizamabad District It is in the town of Pochampad 60km away from Nizamabad It irrigates 4
districts of Northern Telangana Region of Andhra Pradesh and supplies power
The Jayakwadi dam near Paithan is one of the largest earthen dam in India This dam was built to
address the problem of drought in Marathwada region and problem of flood along the bank of river
Two left and right canals provide the irrigation to fertile land up to Nanded district This dam has
major contribution in industrial development of Aurangabad
Source [34]]
All the dams which are at the level of 500mts AMSL will receive the water from FPC1 and thoses at
or below the level of 300mts AMSL will receive the water from FPC4
64 FampF ndash Narmada river water projects
[Narmada River
Narmada river development (NRD)
The Narmada river has a huge water resources potential as much as 3321 MAF (41000 Mcum) of
average annual flow (more than 90 of this flow occurring during the monsoon months of June ndash
September) which according to estimates is greater than the combined annual flows of the Ravi
Beas and the Sutlej rivers which feed the Indus basin The 75 dependable flow is 28 MAF (34537
MCM) Till the beginning of planned development in the country was started in 1946 this huge
potential went almost abegging without any effective utilization thus denying much needed succour
to the drought stricken people of the valley both in Madhya Pradesh and Gujarat Since then plans
have been evolved debated finally legally examined and adjudicated by a tribunal agitated by
NGOs The Supreme Court has finally intervened to ensure that the implementation of the projects is
not halted
Early background and dispute
Investigations for harnessing the Narmada waters started around the time of independence when
Central Waterways Irrigation and Navigation Commission) (CWINC) identified several storage
schemes and in 1948 the Khosla Committee prioritized the proposals and named Tawa Bargi
Punasa and Bharuch projects (the last three on the main stem of the river) for preparation of
reports The reports were ready by 1963 A parallel study of the Hydropower potential identified 16
sites with a potential of 1300 MW While the project in Gujarat called Baruch Weir project (for which
Jawaharlal Nehru laid the foundation stone in 1961) went through a series of modifications and
improvements with a reformed scheme at Navagam village to extend benefits up to the Rann of
Kutch but following the bifurcation of the erstwhile Bombay state into Maharashtra and Gujarat
states and Gujaratrsquos intent to raise the height of the dam at Navagam to maximize storage benefits
at the cost of submergence of potential hydropower sites in Maharashtra and Madhya Pradesh
created a dispute between the states This resulted in an impasse in the implementation o f the
agreed projects at Navagam in Gujarat Punasa in MP and Bargi dam in MP and power benefit
sharing among the states with MP refusing to ratify the agreements To break the logjam a high
level Committee was appointed by the Govt of India in Septembe r 1964 In 1965 the Committee
prepared a Master Plan for the basin which involved construction of 12 major projects in MP and the
Navagam dam in Gujarat It provided irrigation priority over power irrigation of 2630 kmsup2 in MP
400 kmsup2 in Maharashtra 1850 kmsup2 in Gujarat and 4000 kmsup2 in Rajasthan The storages it
recommended in MP involved Bargi Tawa and Narmadasagar (Punasa) while its proposed Navagam
high dam would submerge the hydelpower project sites of Jalasindhi (in Maharshtra) and Harinphal
(MP) but without any more submergence than would be caused by the three dams if separately
constructed Gujarat endorsed this proposal but Maharashtra was not willing to go by it After
intense parleys failed to resolve the problem GOI decided to set up the Narmada Water Disputes
Tribunal (NWDT) in 1969 under the Inter State Water Disputes Act 1956 to adjudicate on the
dispute relating to sharing of water of the inter-state river Narmada and its valley
Tribunal award After ten years of deliberations the Narmada Water Disputes Tribunal (NWDT) gave
its award in December 1979 The NWDT considering the development of the water resources of the
basin as a whole gave its award allocating share of water (after accepting the mutually agreed
settlement among the four party states in 1974 on sharing of the waters of Narmada on the basis
of a determination by the Tribunal of the height of the Navagam dam or the Sardar Sarovar dam)
and Hydro Power of the Sardar Sarovar Project
The Tribunalrsquos final order determined the utilizable quantum of Narmada waters to be 27 million
acre feet at 75 dependability and allocated it to the four states as in Table below including share
of power benefits It also stipulated the share of water when utilizable flow was in excess of 28
million acre feet The Navagam dam height was fixed at FRL 460 feet (140 m) with a maximum water
level of EL feet The Full Supply Level of the Navagam canal was fixed at 300 feet (91 m) The cost
sharing formula among the states and the consequent requirement of release of regulated releases
from the Narmada Sagar dam by MP was also spelt out The resettlement and rehabilitation package
was also clearly specified with all costs to be borne by Gujarat for all resettlement and rehabilitation
work of people affected in the three states and also for relocating any ancient or historic
monuments places of worship or idols likely to suffer submergence
Party state Alloted share of
water in million
acre feet (MAF)
share of
power
Madya Pradesh 1825 57
Gujarath 9 16
Maharastra 025 27
Rajastan 05 Nil
Total 28 100
The uniqueness of this Award is that a non riparian state ndash Rajasthan ndash has been allocated a share of
Narmada waters for meeting the water requirements of the drought prone districts of Barmer and
Jalore which have no other source of dependable water
Go ahead for the projects The work on the project did not start soon since extensive studies were
undertaken for project designing and with World Bank getting involved with funding studies and
project costs (Loan agreement with GOI of $450 million was signed in May 1985) the Resettlement
and Rehabilitation package was substantially revised over and above what was set in the NWDT
and environmental studies had to be undertaken But the environmental and forest cle arances for
the projects from the newly formed Ministry of Environment and Forests (MoEampF) involved
extensive inter-ministerial and inter departmental discussions (within the central govt and with state
govts) for a substantial period and it was only in June 1987 (almost 8 years after the NWDT award
was given in Dec 1979) that the MoEampF gave a conditional approval to the Sardar Sarovar and
Narmada Sagar Projects The Forest clearance was given in September 1987 for Sardar Sarovar only
The clearance also required the work to be done pari passu with the construction of the dams and
the filling of the reservoir In the mean time the Narmada Control Authority (NCA) an inter-State
Administrative Authority and the Sardar Sarovar Construction Advisory Committee (SSCAC) were set
up in 1980 by the Govt of India in compliance of the NWDT award the former organization was set
up in Dec 1980 as body corporate with representatives from the four party states and Govt of India
as a machinery to implement the decisions and directions of the NWDT and the later organization
was set up in Sept 1980 as a statutory body to ensure efficient economical and timely execution of
the Unit I (Dam amp appurtenant works) and Unit III (Hydropower works) of the Sardar Sarovar Project
(SSP) A Review Committee consisting of the Union Minister for Irrigation (now substituted by Union
Minister for Water Resources) as its Chairperson and the Chief Ministers of Madhya Pradesh
Maharashtra Gujarat and Rajasthan as its members is also in position to review the decisions of the
NCA and the SSCAC as required For monitoring and implementation of various environmental
activities effectively independent machinery of Environment Sub-Group is functioning since
Nov1987 under NCA Similarly for monitoring the progress of the resettlement and rehabilitation of
project affected people RampR subgroup is also functioning under the NCA At the state level Sardar
Sarovar Narmada Nigam Limited (SSNL) in Gujarat has the mandate to implement and manage the
Sardar Sarovar multipurpose project In Madhya Pradesh the Narmada Valley Development
Authority (NVDA) is vested the responsibility for implementation of the projects
Narmada River
Layout of Water Resources Development Projects in the Narmada Basin in Gujarat amp Madhya
Pradesh
Even though the tribunal award resolved the initial issue of water sharing however the height of
dam benefit sharing and the mode of settlement of project-affected people caused serious
difficulties in implementation particularly of the Sardar Sarovar dam (the terminal dam on the river)
Project-affected people agitated under the banner of the dedicated NGO - The Narmada Bachao
Andolan (NBA) The NBA followed up by Public Interest Litigation (PIL) in the Supreme Court The
NBA questioned the benefits claimed from the major projects challenged the resettlement and
rehabilitation packages for project affected people of the reservoir submergence and canal affected
zones and its implementation It also rejected the environmental impact assessments made and the
remedial actions taken by the project authorities This challenge created worldwide attention to the
major development activity planned in the valley It urged the World Bank to withdraw from the
project and the intense world wide pressure resulted in the Bank mounting an Independent Review
Mission (IRM) called the Morse Mission to review the SSP But the IRMrsquos report was neither
accepted by the Government of India or the World Bank Finally Government of India decided to
terminate further drawals from a remaining $180 million World Bank credit from the Bank with the
firm resolution that the project would be completed within the national resources
The Supreme Court has also deliberated on this issue for several years but finally upheld the Tribunal
Award and allowed the construction to proceed subject to conditions The Court introduced a
mechanism to monitor the progress of resettlement pari-passu with the raising of the height of the
dam through Grievance Redressal Authorities (GRA) in each of the party states The courtrsquos decision
referred in this document given in the year 2000 after 7 years of deliberations has paved the way
for completing the project to attain full envisaged benefits Some of the courtrsquos decisions are
essential to be quoted here (quoted in italics) to set at rest many of the distorted or incorrect
versions being presented in several of the linked Wikipedia articles on this subject
The overall plan for development ultimately conceived involves 30 major dams including Sardar
Sarovar (21 irrigation 5 hydropower and 4 multipurpose) some 135 medium dams and over three
minor dams in MP along the main stem of the river and its 41 tributaries to utilize its allocated share
of 1825 MAF before 2025 (within 45 years of the NWDT award) In addition to power generation
and irrigation within the basin water was allocated for domestic and industrial water uses and for
multipurpose trans-basin diversions to Son and Tons basins in eastern MP drought prone areas of
Saurashtra Kutch northern mainland in Gujarat and southern Rajasthan Irrigation benefits to the
extent of about 40000 to 50000 kmsup2 (of drought prone and scarcity areas) and power generation of
2600 MW were also envisaged Thus the Narmada river development is envisaged as a multi state
program for development of hydropower and irrigation dams and their associated irrigation
networks
Justice Bharucha stated that Considering the magnitude of rehabilitation involving a large
percentage of tribals loss of extensive forest area rich in biological diversity enormous
environmental cost of the project and considering the fact that the basic data on vital aspects are
still not available there could be but one conclusion that the project(s) are not ready for approval
Sardar Sarovar Project (SSP) at Navagam Subsequent to the Tribunal award and approval to the
project in 1987 by the Ministry of Water Resources with due clearances from the MoEampF
implementation of the SSP was taken up as the terminal project on the main stem of the Narmada
in Gujarat to utilize the share of allocated water to Gujarat and Rajasthan The concrete gravity dam
of 1210 m length and 163 m height above foundation with storage capacity of 77 million acre -feet
and reservoir length of 213 m extending into Gujarat Maharashtra and Madhya Pradesh is designed
to provide an annual irrigation of 18000 kmsup2 in Gujarat (covering 3360 villages of 62 talukas in 14
districts) 4260 kmsup2 in Rajasthan and hydel power generation of 1450 MW As a result of
construction of the dam over 48269 families (against 7000 families assessed in 1979 by the
Tribunal) will be affected as per the latest figures of NCA in the three States spread over 244
villages (4 fully and 240 partially - 39369 in MP in 192 villages 4163 in Maharshtra in 33 villages and
4737 in Gujarat in 19 villages) the total area affected being 37533 kmsup2 The submergence area is
broadly divided into two areas fully tribal area which covers the initial reach of about 100 or so
villages which are almost 100 tribal and hilly These include al l the 33 villages of Maharashtra (in
Nadurbar district) all 19 of Gujarat and many of the Madhya Pradesh The second part of the
submergence area is the mixed population area on the Nimad plains with a very well developed
economy that is well connected to the mainstream Considered as the largest water resources
project of India in terms of benefits some of the special features of the project are the following
Damrsquos spillway discharging capacity (307 million cusecs) is the 3rd highest in the world
With 1133 msup3s (40000 ftsup3s) capacity at the head regulator and 532 km length (458 km in
Gujarat and 74 km in Rajasthan) with 75000 km length of distribution system including field
channel the Narmada Main Canal is the largest irrigation canal in the world
The project aims at supplying 3571000 msup3day of drinking water (2900000 msup3day for domestic
consumption amp 671000 msup3day for industrial consumption) to 8215 villages amp 135 towns in Gujarat
which are presently suffering from acute shortage of water Also the project aims to provide
drinking water facilities to a population of about 1371000 in 1107 villages amp two towns in Jallore amp
Barmer districts of Rajasthan
Has the lowest ratio of submergence to area irrigated ndash being 165 of CCA against an average of
4 to 5 of other major irrigation projects
All the 6 units of River Bed Power House (RBPH) have been commissioned successfully by June 2006
and are in operation All the five units of Canal Head Power House (CHPH) have been commissioned
successfully by end of December 2004 and are in operation
The construction of the two multipurpose major projects - the Sardar Sarvoar in Gujarat and Indira
Sagar in Madya Pradesh - the two are interdependent to attain full envisaged benefits - is in progress
and substantial partial benefits have already been achieved Hence details of these two projects are
elaborated below
Sardar Sarovar Dam Gujarat partially completed (up to EL12192 m)
Largest lined canal in the World Sardar Sarovar Project
The dam has attained a height of EL12192 m ie the crest level of the spillway The gates are yet to
be erected to attain the FRL of EL 13868 m for which clearance is required from the Supreme Court
after the Grievance Redressal Committee submits its report on completion of R amp R up to that
elevation Top level of dam to be attained is EL 14650 m
The main irrigation canal has been substantially constructed for a length of 357 km Water has been
let into the canal for partial irrigation and water supply needs Further construction is in progress
Indira Sagar Project (ISP) in Madhya Pradesh at Punasa is one of the 30 major projects proposed in
the Narmada basin with the largest storage capacity in the country The project is located near
Punasa village in Khandwa District of Madhya Pradesh This Multipurpose River Valley Project
envisages construction of a concrete gravity dam 653 m long and 92 m high with gross storage
capacity of the reservoir of 1222 kmsup3 (99 MAF) and live storage of 975 kmsup3 (79MAF) to provide an
annual irrigation potential of 1690 kmsup2 and generation of 1000 MW of hydropower The project
shall also ensure supply of 006 MAF (74000000 msup3) of drinking water to rural areas in Khandwa
district In accordance with NWDT award an annual regulated flow of 812 MAF (10015 kmsup3) shall
be released to the Sardar Sarovar Project (SSP) ex-Maheshwar Project The operation of Indira Sagar
Project shall be carried out in such a way as to facilitate the regulation of Sardar Sarovar
Indira Sagar dam partially completed in Madhya Pradesh
Indira Sagar canal for irrigation
The dam and the powerhouse have been completed but storage has been restricted up to EL 260 m
under orders of the High Court Jabalpur from RampR consideration All the units of the powerhouse
have been commissioned and generation of power from the 8 units of 125 MW capacity each
commenced from Jan 2004[25]The irrigation component of the project is under a fairly advance
stage of implementation
Other completed and under construction projects Existing irrigation projects in the Narmada are the
1) Matiyari (1992) 2) Rani Avantibai Sagar (1988) 3) Barna (1978) 4) Tawa (1992-93) 5) Sukta
(1984) all in Madhya Pradesh and Karjan project in Gujarat
Projects under implementation are the 1) Bargi diversion 2) Kolar 3) Man 4) Omkareshwar
multipurpose (520 MW ndash commissioned in Nov 2007) and 5) Maheshwar (400 MW)
A large number of medium and small projects have been completed and many more are under
implementation as conceived under the overall Master Plan
Source [34]]
With the establishment of RCS all the dams and the hydroelectrical projects will get sufficient water
from the FPC1 and the West extension of FPC1 in this scenario if the levels of these projects are less
than 500 meters AMSL Problems like lsquohigh the magnitude of rehabilitation involving a large
percentage of tribals loss of extensive forest area rich in biological diversity enormous
environmental cost of the projectrsquo will not appear with RCS and all the states coming under this issue
like Madyapradesh Maharastra Gujarath and Rajastan will get more than sufficient water for
irrigation ndash industry ndash hydroelectrical projects ndash for domestic purposes
The cost will be less since (1) it involves only the creation of primary channel (2) there is no
necessity to construct the dams (3) there is no necessity to rehabilitate the people in a great way
since RCS involves very minimal area (4) no immersion of land like city and forest area in back water
in a bigger way (5) we may be creating U tubes in depressed lands in the course of primary channel
or the bi dam in a minimally depressed area but there is no back water issues in these and hence
land involved and rehabilitation are going to be less
All the water are used effectively and no water will enter the Arabian sea without being used
effectively over the land that is the more water generated beyond the storing capacity of the dam in
the rainy seasons will be effectively utilized all over the nation in the lands below 500 mts AMSL
65 FampF ndashWater dispute ndash Height of almatti dam
[Water disputes
Height of almatti dam
State gets a good deal Tribunal gives nod to raise Almatti dam height to 52425 meters
New Delhi In what could be a major relief to Karnataka the Krishna water disputes tribunal -2 has
allowed the state to build the Almatti dam up to the originally proposed height of 52425 meters
Major decisions Karnataka allowed to increase almatti dam height from 519 meters to 52425
meters Krishna waters decision Implementation Board to be set up will monitor flows Releases to
be monitored every 10 days Karnataka should release 8 to 10 tmc to AP in June and July Award to
come up for review in 2050
Water allocations Total water availability 2293tmc Andrapradesh 1001tmc Karnataka 911tmc
maharastra666tmc
This judgment has been given after 43 years of proceedings Source [37] ]
It is true by increasing the height of the dam from 519 to 52425 mts It is possible to store more
water that we can use it later
But what is the use if we are not getting sufficient water to fill the dam in one rain year As per the
calculation the total available water is 2293 TMC Andrapradesh is more benefitted from this
because there is more land available for agriculture and more population is going to be benefited If
the water generated is less then both the states are under loss The level of water (Height) in the
dam depends on the rain in the catchment area (Inflow) and the utilization in the process of
agriculture and others (out flow) If the inflow is steady throughout the year and the out flow is also
steady then both the states are going to be benefitted If we increase the height of the dam then we
may be storing more water but the back water may immerse more inhabited areas and it may
extend in the neighboring states like maharastra and other interstate issues and problems of
rehabilitation will arise
With RCS all such problems will be solved If we are creating the FPC1 at the level of 500mts AMSL
then the back water in the Almatti dam will raise only up to 500 (exactly 495) mts AMSL Any water
which is more than 500 mts AMSL will enter back in the FPC1 But the almatti dam will always be
able to relaease the water to both Karnataka and Andrapradesh what what ever amount they need
Here the total water availability 2293tmc and the allotted water to Andrapradesh 1001tmc and to
Karnataka is 911tmc Maharastra 666tmc With RCS the total water available becomes 10000 or
even more TMC and the states like Andrapradesh Karnataka and Maharastra can use 2000TMC or
even more if they want because the FPC1 will be continuously filled by the ri vers like Ganga ndash
Yamuna ndash Mahanadhi ndash Narnmada- Godhavari ndash Kaveri ndash and Krishna it iself
Thus we need not increase the height of the almatti dam lsquoin this instance onlyrsquo Increasing the height
of the dam may be the necessity in another instance that we need to discuss as such issues arises
Sources
[34] Britannica Concise Encyclopedia answerscom Wikipedia
[37] Deccan herald Mangalore Friday december31 2010 And Prajavani Kannada daily news paper
Mangalore Friday December 31 2010
Idukki arch dam in idukki
Mullaperiyar Dam
Malankara Dam
Neyyar Dam
Siruvani Dam
Meenkara Dam
Kanjhirapuzha
Chulliyar Dam
Jeevana dam
Madhya Pradesh
Bansagar
Bargi Dam
Barna Dam
Gandhi Sagar dam
Indirasagar
Madikheda Dam
Narmada Dam Project
Rajghat
Tawa Reservoir
halali dam
kolar dam
kerwa dam
Maharashtra
MULA Dam Rahuri - River MULA
Koyna Dam - River Koyna
Jaikwadi
Ujani -River Bhima
Mulshi Dam - River Mula
Khadakwasla - River Mutha
Kolkewadi Dam
Panshet - River Mutha
Radhanagari
Bhatsa
Tansa
Vaitarna
Pawna - River Pawna
Bhandardara
Gangapur Dam Nashik
Ozarkhed Dam Nashik
Karanjwan Dam
Nandur Madhmeshwar Dam
Yeldari on Purna River Near Parbhani
Siddheshwar on Purna River Near Parbhani
Manar On River Manar Near Nanded
Girna On River Girna
Chaskaman On River Bhima Near Rajgurunagar
Pravara On River Godavari
Isapur Dam on River Painganga River
Bhadardara On River Pravara
Meghalaya
Umiam Lake
Orissa
Balimela Reservoir
Hirakud Dam on Mahanadi River near Sambalpur
Balimela Reservoir
Jalaput on Machkund River near Jaypore Koraput District
Indravati Dam on river Indravati in kalahandi district
Salia dam on river Kharkhari in Ganjam District
Tamil Nadu
Aliyar Reservoir
Amaravathi Reservoir
Amaravathi Dam
Anaikuttam Reservoir
Anainaduvu Reservoir
Bhavanisagar Reservoir
Chittar Reservoir
Chittar Reservoir-1
Chittar Reservoir-2
Gatana Reservoir
Golwarpatti Reservoir
Gomukhinadhi Reservoir
Gundar Reservoir
Gunderippalam Reservoir
Kariakoil Reservoir
Karupppanadhi Reservoir
Kelavarapalli Reservoir
Kesarigulihalla Reservoir
Kodaganar Reservoir
Kovilar Reservoir
Krishnagiri Reservoir
Kullursandai Reservoir
Kutharaiyar Reservoir
Lower Nirar Reservoir
Manimukthanadhi Reservoir
Manimuthar Reservoir
Manjalar Reservoir
Marudhanadhi Reservoir
Mettur Dam
Nagavathi Reservoir
Noyyal Oarathuppalayam
Palar Porandalar Reservoir
Pambar Reservoir
Parambikulam Reservoir
Parappalar Reservoir
Pechiparai Reservoir
Periyar Reservoir (Pilavukkal Project)
Periyar Reservoir
Perumpallam Reservoir
Perunchani Reservoir
Peruvaripallam
Ponnaniar Reservoir
Ramanadhi Reservoir
Sathanur Reservoir
Sholayar Reservoir
Siddhamalli Reservoir
Soolagiri chinnar Reservoir
Stanley Reservoir
Thambalahalli Reservoir
Thirumurthi Reservoir
Thoppaiyar Reservoir
Thunakadavu Reservoir
Uppar Reservoir
Upper Nirar Wier
Vaigai Dam
Vaigai Reservoir
Vaniyar Reservoir
Varadamanadhi Reservoir
Varattupallam Reservoir
Vattamalaikarai Odai Reservoir
Vembakottai Reservoir
Vidur Reservoir
Willingdon Reservoir
Uttar Pradesh
Govind Ballabh Pant Sagar on Rihand River in Sonbhadra
Kalagarh Dam on Ramganga River in Kalagarh
Parichha Dam on Betwa River in Parichha (Jhansi District)
List of Dams in Lalitpur District Uttar Pradesh
o (A) Matatila Dam constructed during 1952-1964 on Betwa River in Lalitpur District Uttar Pradesh
Length 630 km Height 3353 Meters Area 20720 Sqkm Storage 113268 Mcm
o (B) Jamni Dam constructed during 1962-1973 on Jamni River in Lalitpur District Uttar Pradesh
Length 640 km Height 1918 Meters Area 414 Sqkm Storage 9289 Mcm
o (C) Rohini Dam constructed during 1976-1984 on Rohini River in Lalitpur District Uttar Pradesh
Length 165km Height 1550 Meters Area 44 Sqkm Storage 1212 Mcm
o (D) Shahzad Dam constructed during 1973-1992 on Shahzad River in Lalitpur District Uttar
Pradesh Length 416 km Height 1800 Meters Area 514 Sqkm Storage 13000 Mcm
o (E) Govind Sagar Dam constructed during 1947-1953 on Shahzad River in Lalitpur District Uttar
Pradesh Length 360 km Height 1829 Meters Area 368 Sqkm Storage 968 Mcm
o (F) Sajnam Dam constructed during 1977-1990 on Sajnam River in Lalitpur District Uttar Pradesh
Length 515 km Height 1878 Meters Area 290 Sqkm Storage 8350 Mcm
o (G) Sukma-Dukma Dam a below water construction on Betwa River near Jhansi District Uttar
Pradesh Length 215 km Height 2078 Meters
Uttarakhand
Tehri dam
Dhauli ganga dam
Sriram Sagar
Devadula Lift Irrigation Project
Kaddam
Manjira Reservoir
Lower Tirna
Purna
Upper PenGanga
Lower Dudhana
Jayakwadi Dam
Bhandara Reservoir
Mula Reservoir
Upper Pravara
Upper Indravati Project
Godavari Canal
Upper WainGanga
Majalgaon irrigation project is located in the Godavari river basin in the state of Maharashtra
West Bengal
Panchet Dam
Dam projects
Narmada Dam Project
Banasura Sagar Dam - Banasurasagar Project
Noyyal River - Tanks System
Farakka Barrage
Source [34] ]
All the dams and the areas which are below the level of 500mts AMSL except in the states of Jammu
and Kashmir Northestern states will get the water form RCS and the principle feeders will be the
Ganga and the Yamuna
All the dams and the areas which are below the level of 300mts AMSL except in the states of Jammu
and Kashmir Northestern states will get the water form RCS and the principle feeders will be the
Brahamaputra for the RCS
All the dams and the areas which are below the level of 900mts AMSL in south deccan platue
especially the southern districts of Karnataka western districts of Andra Pradesh and Tamilnadu will
get the water from the RCS and the principle feeders will be the River Kavery
All the dams and the areas which are below the level of 800mts AMSL in north India like states of
Punjab Haryana Himachal Pradesh Delhi northern district of Uttarpradesh Bihar which are north
to the course of Ganga and Yamuna will get the water from the RCS and the principle feeders will be
the Ganaga and Yamuna Rivers
62 FampF ndash Projects across River kosi [Kosi River
Development scenario
Multipurpose projects
After India attained independence in August 1947 the development scenario in India has been
resolute on technological development In keeping with this approach the National Flood Control
Policy in 1954 (following the disastrous floods of 1954 in a large part of the Koshi river basin) stated
that floods could be controlled through a series of flood protection works like dams embankments
and river training works One such work which drew the immediate attention of the policy planners
after independence was a solution to the recurring flood menace faced by people of North Bihar due
to the Kosi and other rivers flowing from Nepal to India The Kosi project was thus conceptualized
(based on investigations between 1946 to 1955) in three continuous interlinked stages ndash the first
was a barrage to anchor this wayward river that had migrated about 120 km (75 mi) westward in the
last 250 years laying waste to a huge tract in north Bihar and to provide irrigation and power
benefits to Nepal and India The second part was to build embankments both below and above the
barrage so as to jacket the river within the defined channel The third part envisaged a high
multipurpose dam within Nepal at Barakshetra to provide substantial flood cushion along with large
irrigation and power benefits to both countries This was followed up by signing of the Kosi
Agreement between Nepal and India on 25 April 1954 and which was revised on 19 December 1966
to address the concerns of Nepal Further letters of Exchange to the Agreement between the two
countries provided for additional schemes for providing benefits of irri gation While the first two
parts of the concept plan have been implemented at the cost of the Government of India the third
part namely the Koshi High dam the kingpin of the whole concept for various political reasons
precluded any action for several years but has since been revived under a fresh agreement in a
modified form for further investigations and studies
Details of the above projects are elaborated below
Kosi barrage and irrigation
Kosi Barrage also called Bhimnagar Barrage after the name of the place where it was built between
the years 1959 and 1963 straddles the Indo-Nepal border It is an irrigation flood control and
hydropower generation project on the Kosi river built under a bilateral agreement between Nepal
and India the entire cost of the project was borne by India The catchment area of the river is
61788 km2 (23856 sq mi) in Nepal at the Barrage site The highest peaks ndash the Mount Everest and
the Mount Kanchenjunga mdash lie in its catchment About 10 of this catchment is snow-fed The
Eastern Canal and the Western Canal taking off from the barrage have been designed for a discharge
capacity of 455 cubic metres per second (16100 cu fts) to irrigate 6125 square kilometres
(1514000 acres) and 210 cubic metres per second (7400 cu fts) to irrigate 35661 square
kilometres (881200 acres) respectively A hydropower plant has been built on the Eastern Canal at
a canal drop (36 km (22 mi) from the Koshi Barrage) to generate 20 MW The Western Kosi Canal
provides irrigation to 250 square kilometres (62000 acres) in Nepal A valuable bridge over the
barrage opened up the East-West highway in the eastern sector of Nepal
An inundation canal taking off at Chatra where the Kosi debouches into the plains has been built to
irrigate a gross area of 860 kmsup2 in Nepal The project has been renovated with IDA assistance after
Nepal took over the project in 1976
Silt deposition near Kosi embankment at Navbhata Saharsa Bihar India
Kosi embankment system
The Kosi barrage with earth dams across river afflux bunds and embankments above and below the
river confines the river to flow within embankments Embankments on both sides downstream of
the barrage with a length of 246 km (153 mi) has been constructed to check the westward
movement of the river The embankments have been kept wide apart about 12 to 16 km (99 mi) to
serve as a silt trap
Sapta Kosi High Multipurpose Project (Indo-Nepal)
Government of India (GOI) and His Majestys Government of Nepal (HMGN) have agreed to conduct
joint investigations and other studies for the preparation of Detailed Project Report (DPR) of Sapta
Kosi High Dam Multipurpose Project and Sun Kosi Storage-cum-Diversion Scheme to meet the
objectives of both the countries for Development of a) hydropower generation b) irrigation c) flood
controlmanagement and d) navigation
A 269-metre (880 ft) high concreteRock fill dam on the Sapta Koshi River with a dam toe
underground power house with an installed capacity of 3000 MW at 50 load factor a barrage on
river Sapta Kosi about 8 km (50 mi) downstream of Sapta Kosi High Dam to re-regulate the water
being released from the Sapta Koshi dam with two canals Eastern Chhatra Canal and Western
Chhatra Canal off-taking from the either bank from barrage site to provide water for irrigation both
in Nepal and India and Navigation through Koshi up to Kursela and also in the reservoir of Sapta
Koshi dam are envisaged
A Power Canal off-taking from the Eastern Chatra Canal is proposed for conveying the water
required for irrigation at existing Kosi barrage at Hanuman Nagar and also the water which may be
required downstream of Hanuman Nagar Barrage for the purpose of navigation To utilize the head
available between Chatra and Hanuman Nagar barrages for power generation three canal Power
Houses each of 100 MW installed capacity are also proposed on power canal
Necessary cushion in storage capacity of Sapta Kosi High Dam would be provided to moderate the
flood downstream of dam
Chatra Canal System would provide irrigation to large areas in Nepal and India (particularly in Bihar)
A Joint Project Office (JPO) has been set up in Nepal for investigation of the project
Hydropower
Nepal has a total estimated potential of 83290 MW out of which economically exploitable potential
is 42140 MW The Koshi river basin contributes 22350 MW of this potential(360 MW from small
schemes and 1875 MW from major schemes) and the economically exploitable potential is assessd
as 10860 MW (includes the Sapta Koshi Multipurpose Project [3300MW] mentioned above) Source [34]]
Damages to the canal ndash embankment ndash hydroelectrical projects are the possibilities if we create the
projects at places where we can expect high flow in short time of period It is better to target the
water at higher level before they unite and form big volume of water at one point
63 FampF ndash Irrigation projects along the river Godavari
[Godavari River Basin Irrigation Projects
Godavari River Delta
The Godavari River has its catchment area in five states of India Maharashtra Chattisgarh Madhya
Pradesh Andhra Pradesh Karnataka and Orissa
Dowleswaram Barrage
Jalaput
Balimela Reservoir
Upper Indravati
Nizam Sagar
Dams and bridges along the river
A barrage was built on the river at Dowleswaram was built by Sir Arthur Cotton in 1850 It was
rebuilt as a barrage and roadway during 1980s and named after him The roadway connects
Dowleswaram in East Godavari and Vijjeswaram in West Godavari
There is also a big dam built just after the source of the river at Trimbakeshwar The dam is in the
town of Gangapur which literally means a town on a river The dam provides drinking water to the
residents of Nashik and also supplies water to the thermal power station situated downstream at
Eklahara which provides power to the town
There is another multipurpose project on the Godavari River named Sri Ram Sagar Project in
Nizamabad District It is in the town of Pochampad 60km away from Nizamabad It irrigates 4
districts of Northern Telangana Region of Andhra Pradesh and supplies power
The Jayakwadi dam near Paithan is one of the largest earthen dam in India This dam was built to
address the problem of drought in Marathwada region and problem of flood along the bank of river
Two left and right canals provide the irrigation to fertile land up to Nanded district This dam has
major contribution in industrial development of Aurangabad
Source [34]]
All the dams which are at the level of 500mts AMSL will receive the water from FPC1 and thoses at
or below the level of 300mts AMSL will receive the water from FPC4
64 FampF ndash Narmada river water projects
[Narmada River
Narmada river development (NRD)
The Narmada river has a huge water resources potential as much as 3321 MAF (41000 Mcum) of
average annual flow (more than 90 of this flow occurring during the monsoon months of June ndash
September) which according to estimates is greater than the combined annual flows of the Ravi
Beas and the Sutlej rivers which feed the Indus basin The 75 dependable flow is 28 MAF (34537
MCM) Till the beginning of planned development in the country was started in 1946 this huge
potential went almost abegging without any effective utilization thus denying much needed succour
to the drought stricken people of the valley both in Madhya Pradesh and Gujarat Since then plans
have been evolved debated finally legally examined and adjudicated by a tribunal agitated by
NGOs The Supreme Court has finally intervened to ensure that the implementation of the projects is
not halted
Early background and dispute
Investigations for harnessing the Narmada waters started around the time of independence when
Central Waterways Irrigation and Navigation Commission) (CWINC) identified several storage
schemes and in 1948 the Khosla Committee prioritized the proposals and named Tawa Bargi
Punasa and Bharuch projects (the last three on the main stem of the river) for preparation of
reports The reports were ready by 1963 A parallel study of the Hydropower potential identified 16
sites with a potential of 1300 MW While the project in Gujarat called Baruch Weir project (for which
Jawaharlal Nehru laid the foundation stone in 1961) went through a series of modifications and
improvements with a reformed scheme at Navagam village to extend benefits up to the Rann of
Kutch but following the bifurcation of the erstwhile Bombay state into Maharashtra and Gujarat
states and Gujaratrsquos intent to raise the height of the dam at Navagam to maximize storage benefits
at the cost of submergence of potential hydropower sites in Maharashtra and Madhya Pradesh
created a dispute between the states This resulted in an impasse in the implementation o f the
agreed projects at Navagam in Gujarat Punasa in MP and Bargi dam in MP and power benefit
sharing among the states with MP refusing to ratify the agreements To break the logjam a high
level Committee was appointed by the Govt of India in Septembe r 1964 In 1965 the Committee
prepared a Master Plan for the basin which involved construction of 12 major projects in MP and the
Navagam dam in Gujarat It provided irrigation priority over power irrigation of 2630 kmsup2 in MP
400 kmsup2 in Maharashtra 1850 kmsup2 in Gujarat and 4000 kmsup2 in Rajasthan The storages it
recommended in MP involved Bargi Tawa and Narmadasagar (Punasa) while its proposed Navagam
high dam would submerge the hydelpower project sites of Jalasindhi (in Maharshtra) and Harinphal
(MP) but without any more submergence than would be caused by the three dams if separately
constructed Gujarat endorsed this proposal but Maharashtra was not willing to go by it After
intense parleys failed to resolve the problem GOI decided to set up the Narmada Water Disputes
Tribunal (NWDT) in 1969 under the Inter State Water Disputes Act 1956 to adjudicate on the
dispute relating to sharing of water of the inter-state river Narmada and its valley
Tribunal award After ten years of deliberations the Narmada Water Disputes Tribunal (NWDT) gave
its award in December 1979 The NWDT considering the development of the water resources of the
basin as a whole gave its award allocating share of water (after accepting the mutually agreed
settlement among the four party states in 1974 on sharing of the waters of Narmada on the basis
of a determination by the Tribunal of the height of the Navagam dam or the Sardar Sarovar dam)
and Hydro Power of the Sardar Sarovar Project
The Tribunalrsquos final order determined the utilizable quantum of Narmada waters to be 27 million
acre feet at 75 dependability and allocated it to the four states as in Table below including share
of power benefits It also stipulated the share of water when utilizable flow was in excess of 28
million acre feet The Navagam dam height was fixed at FRL 460 feet (140 m) with a maximum water
level of EL feet The Full Supply Level of the Navagam canal was fixed at 300 feet (91 m) The cost
sharing formula among the states and the consequent requirement of release of regulated releases
from the Narmada Sagar dam by MP was also spelt out The resettlement and rehabilitation package
was also clearly specified with all costs to be borne by Gujarat for all resettlement and rehabilitation
work of people affected in the three states and also for relocating any ancient or historic
monuments places of worship or idols likely to suffer submergence
Party state Alloted share of
water in million
acre feet (MAF)
share of
power
Madya Pradesh 1825 57
Gujarath 9 16
Maharastra 025 27
Rajastan 05 Nil
Total 28 100
The uniqueness of this Award is that a non riparian state ndash Rajasthan ndash has been allocated a share of
Narmada waters for meeting the water requirements of the drought prone districts of Barmer and
Jalore which have no other source of dependable water
Go ahead for the projects The work on the project did not start soon since extensive studies were
undertaken for project designing and with World Bank getting involved with funding studies and
project costs (Loan agreement with GOI of $450 million was signed in May 1985) the Resettlement
and Rehabilitation package was substantially revised over and above what was set in the NWDT
and environmental studies had to be undertaken But the environmental and forest cle arances for
the projects from the newly formed Ministry of Environment and Forests (MoEampF) involved
extensive inter-ministerial and inter departmental discussions (within the central govt and with state
govts) for a substantial period and it was only in June 1987 (almost 8 years after the NWDT award
was given in Dec 1979) that the MoEampF gave a conditional approval to the Sardar Sarovar and
Narmada Sagar Projects The Forest clearance was given in September 1987 for Sardar Sarovar only
The clearance also required the work to be done pari passu with the construction of the dams and
the filling of the reservoir In the mean time the Narmada Control Authority (NCA) an inter-State
Administrative Authority and the Sardar Sarovar Construction Advisory Committee (SSCAC) were set
up in 1980 by the Govt of India in compliance of the NWDT award the former organization was set
up in Dec 1980 as body corporate with representatives from the four party states and Govt of India
as a machinery to implement the decisions and directions of the NWDT and the later organization
was set up in Sept 1980 as a statutory body to ensure efficient economical and timely execution of
the Unit I (Dam amp appurtenant works) and Unit III (Hydropower works) of the Sardar Sarovar Project
(SSP) A Review Committee consisting of the Union Minister for Irrigation (now substituted by Union
Minister for Water Resources) as its Chairperson and the Chief Ministers of Madhya Pradesh
Maharashtra Gujarat and Rajasthan as its members is also in position to review the decisions of the
NCA and the SSCAC as required For monitoring and implementation of various environmental
activities effectively independent machinery of Environment Sub-Group is functioning since
Nov1987 under NCA Similarly for monitoring the progress of the resettlement and rehabilitation of
project affected people RampR subgroup is also functioning under the NCA At the state level Sardar
Sarovar Narmada Nigam Limited (SSNL) in Gujarat has the mandate to implement and manage the
Sardar Sarovar multipurpose project In Madhya Pradesh the Narmada Valley Development
Authority (NVDA) is vested the responsibility for implementation of the projects
Narmada River
Layout of Water Resources Development Projects in the Narmada Basin in Gujarat amp Madhya
Pradesh
Even though the tribunal award resolved the initial issue of water sharing however the height of
dam benefit sharing and the mode of settlement of project-affected people caused serious
difficulties in implementation particularly of the Sardar Sarovar dam (the terminal dam on the river)
Project-affected people agitated under the banner of the dedicated NGO - The Narmada Bachao
Andolan (NBA) The NBA followed up by Public Interest Litigation (PIL) in the Supreme Court The
NBA questioned the benefits claimed from the major projects challenged the resettlement and
rehabilitation packages for project affected people of the reservoir submergence and canal affected
zones and its implementation It also rejected the environmental impact assessments made and the
remedial actions taken by the project authorities This challenge created worldwide attention to the
major development activity planned in the valley It urged the World Bank to withdraw from the
project and the intense world wide pressure resulted in the Bank mounting an Independent Review
Mission (IRM) called the Morse Mission to review the SSP But the IRMrsquos report was neither
accepted by the Government of India or the World Bank Finally Government of India decided to
terminate further drawals from a remaining $180 million World Bank credit from the Bank with the
firm resolution that the project would be completed within the national resources
The Supreme Court has also deliberated on this issue for several years but finally upheld the Tribunal
Award and allowed the construction to proceed subject to conditions The Court introduced a
mechanism to monitor the progress of resettlement pari-passu with the raising of the height of the
dam through Grievance Redressal Authorities (GRA) in each of the party states The courtrsquos decision
referred in this document given in the year 2000 after 7 years of deliberations has paved the way
for completing the project to attain full envisaged benefits Some of the courtrsquos decisions are
essential to be quoted here (quoted in italics) to set at rest many of the distorted or incorrect
versions being presented in several of the linked Wikipedia articles on this subject
The overall plan for development ultimately conceived involves 30 major dams including Sardar
Sarovar (21 irrigation 5 hydropower and 4 multipurpose) some 135 medium dams and over three
minor dams in MP along the main stem of the river and its 41 tributaries to utilize its allocated share
of 1825 MAF before 2025 (within 45 years of the NWDT award) In addition to power generation
and irrigation within the basin water was allocated for domestic and industrial water uses and for
multipurpose trans-basin diversions to Son and Tons basins in eastern MP drought prone areas of
Saurashtra Kutch northern mainland in Gujarat and southern Rajasthan Irrigation benefits to the
extent of about 40000 to 50000 kmsup2 (of drought prone and scarcity areas) and power generation of
2600 MW were also envisaged Thus the Narmada river development is envisaged as a multi state
program for development of hydropower and irrigation dams and their associated irrigation
networks
Justice Bharucha stated that Considering the magnitude of rehabilitation involving a large
percentage of tribals loss of extensive forest area rich in biological diversity enormous
environmental cost of the project and considering the fact that the basic data on vital aspects are
still not available there could be but one conclusion that the project(s) are not ready for approval
Sardar Sarovar Project (SSP) at Navagam Subsequent to the Tribunal award and approval to the
project in 1987 by the Ministry of Water Resources with due clearances from the MoEampF
implementation of the SSP was taken up as the terminal project on the main stem of the Narmada
in Gujarat to utilize the share of allocated water to Gujarat and Rajasthan The concrete gravity dam
of 1210 m length and 163 m height above foundation with storage capacity of 77 million acre -feet
and reservoir length of 213 m extending into Gujarat Maharashtra and Madhya Pradesh is designed
to provide an annual irrigation of 18000 kmsup2 in Gujarat (covering 3360 villages of 62 talukas in 14
districts) 4260 kmsup2 in Rajasthan and hydel power generation of 1450 MW As a result of
construction of the dam over 48269 families (against 7000 families assessed in 1979 by the
Tribunal) will be affected as per the latest figures of NCA in the three States spread over 244
villages (4 fully and 240 partially - 39369 in MP in 192 villages 4163 in Maharshtra in 33 villages and
4737 in Gujarat in 19 villages) the total area affected being 37533 kmsup2 The submergence area is
broadly divided into two areas fully tribal area which covers the initial reach of about 100 or so
villages which are almost 100 tribal and hilly These include al l the 33 villages of Maharashtra (in
Nadurbar district) all 19 of Gujarat and many of the Madhya Pradesh The second part of the
submergence area is the mixed population area on the Nimad plains with a very well developed
economy that is well connected to the mainstream Considered as the largest water resources
project of India in terms of benefits some of the special features of the project are the following
Damrsquos spillway discharging capacity (307 million cusecs) is the 3rd highest in the world
With 1133 msup3s (40000 ftsup3s) capacity at the head regulator and 532 km length (458 km in
Gujarat and 74 km in Rajasthan) with 75000 km length of distribution system including field
channel the Narmada Main Canal is the largest irrigation canal in the world
The project aims at supplying 3571000 msup3day of drinking water (2900000 msup3day for domestic
consumption amp 671000 msup3day for industrial consumption) to 8215 villages amp 135 towns in Gujarat
which are presently suffering from acute shortage of water Also the project aims to provide
drinking water facilities to a population of about 1371000 in 1107 villages amp two towns in Jallore amp
Barmer districts of Rajasthan
Has the lowest ratio of submergence to area irrigated ndash being 165 of CCA against an average of
4 to 5 of other major irrigation projects
All the 6 units of River Bed Power House (RBPH) have been commissioned successfully by June 2006
and are in operation All the five units of Canal Head Power House (CHPH) have been commissioned
successfully by end of December 2004 and are in operation
The construction of the two multipurpose major projects - the Sardar Sarvoar in Gujarat and Indira
Sagar in Madya Pradesh - the two are interdependent to attain full envisaged benefits - is in progress
and substantial partial benefits have already been achieved Hence details of these two projects are
elaborated below
Sardar Sarovar Dam Gujarat partially completed (up to EL12192 m)
Largest lined canal in the World Sardar Sarovar Project
The dam has attained a height of EL12192 m ie the crest level of the spillway The gates are yet to
be erected to attain the FRL of EL 13868 m for which clearance is required from the Supreme Court
after the Grievance Redressal Committee submits its report on completion of R amp R up to that
elevation Top level of dam to be attained is EL 14650 m
The main irrigation canal has been substantially constructed for a length of 357 km Water has been
let into the canal for partial irrigation and water supply needs Further construction is in progress
Indira Sagar Project (ISP) in Madhya Pradesh at Punasa is one of the 30 major projects proposed in
the Narmada basin with the largest storage capacity in the country The project is located near
Punasa village in Khandwa District of Madhya Pradesh This Multipurpose River Valley Project
envisages construction of a concrete gravity dam 653 m long and 92 m high with gross storage
capacity of the reservoir of 1222 kmsup3 (99 MAF) and live storage of 975 kmsup3 (79MAF) to provide an
annual irrigation potential of 1690 kmsup2 and generation of 1000 MW of hydropower The project
shall also ensure supply of 006 MAF (74000000 msup3) of drinking water to rural areas in Khandwa
district In accordance with NWDT award an annual regulated flow of 812 MAF (10015 kmsup3) shall
be released to the Sardar Sarovar Project (SSP) ex-Maheshwar Project The operation of Indira Sagar
Project shall be carried out in such a way as to facilitate the regulation of Sardar Sarovar
Indira Sagar dam partially completed in Madhya Pradesh
Indira Sagar canal for irrigation
The dam and the powerhouse have been completed but storage has been restricted up to EL 260 m
under orders of the High Court Jabalpur from RampR consideration All the units of the powerhouse
have been commissioned and generation of power from the 8 units of 125 MW capacity each
commenced from Jan 2004[25]The irrigation component of the project is under a fairly advance
stage of implementation
Other completed and under construction projects Existing irrigation projects in the Narmada are the
1) Matiyari (1992) 2) Rani Avantibai Sagar (1988) 3) Barna (1978) 4) Tawa (1992-93) 5) Sukta
(1984) all in Madhya Pradesh and Karjan project in Gujarat
Projects under implementation are the 1) Bargi diversion 2) Kolar 3) Man 4) Omkareshwar
multipurpose (520 MW ndash commissioned in Nov 2007) and 5) Maheshwar (400 MW)
A large number of medium and small projects have been completed and many more are under
implementation as conceived under the overall Master Plan
Source [34]]
With the establishment of RCS all the dams and the hydroelectrical projects will get sufficient water
from the FPC1 and the West extension of FPC1 in this scenario if the levels of these projects are less
than 500 meters AMSL Problems like lsquohigh the magnitude of rehabilitation involving a large
percentage of tribals loss of extensive forest area rich in biological diversity enormous
environmental cost of the projectrsquo will not appear with RCS and all the states coming under this issue
like Madyapradesh Maharastra Gujarath and Rajastan will get more than sufficient water for
irrigation ndash industry ndash hydroelectrical projects ndash for domestic purposes
The cost will be less since (1) it involves only the creation of primary channel (2) there is no
necessity to construct the dams (3) there is no necessity to rehabilitate the people in a great way
since RCS involves very minimal area (4) no immersion of land like city and forest area in back water
in a bigger way (5) we may be creating U tubes in depressed lands in the course of primary channel
or the bi dam in a minimally depressed area but there is no back water issues in these and hence
land involved and rehabilitation are going to be less
All the water are used effectively and no water will enter the Arabian sea without being used
effectively over the land that is the more water generated beyond the storing capacity of the dam in
the rainy seasons will be effectively utilized all over the nation in the lands below 500 mts AMSL
65 FampF ndashWater dispute ndash Height of almatti dam
[Water disputes
Height of almatti dam
State gets a good deal Tribunal gives nod to raise Almatti dam height to 52425 meters
New Delhi In what could be a major relief to Karnataka the Krishna water disputes tribunal -2 has
allowed the state to build the Almatti dam up to the originally proposed height of 52425 meters
Major decisions Karnataka allowed to increase almatti dam height from 519 meters to 52425
meters Krishna waters decision Implementation Board to be set up will monitor flows Releases to
be monitored every 10 days Karnataka should release 8 to 10 tmc to AP in June and July Award to
come up for review in 2050
Water allocations Total water availability 2293tmc Andrapradesh 1001tmc Karnataka 911tmc
maharastra666tmc
This judgment has been given after 43 years of proceedings Source [37] ]
It is true by increasing the height of the dam from 519 to 52425 mts It is possible to store more
water that we can use it later
But what is the use if we are not getting sufficient water to fill the dam in one rain year As per the
calculation the total available water is 2293 TMC Andrapradesh is more benefitted from this
because there is more land available for agriculture and more population is going to be benefited If
the water generated is less then both the states are under loss The level of water (Height) in the
dam depends on the rain in the catchment area (Inflow) and the utilization in the process of
agriculture and others (out flow) If the inflow is steady throughout the year and the out flow is also
steady then both the states are going to be benefitted If we increase the height of the dam then we
may be storing more water but the back water may immerse more inhabited areas and it may
extend in the neighboring states like maharastra and other interstate issues and problems of
rehabilitation will arise
With RCS all such problems will be solved If we are creating the FPC1 at the level of 500mts AMSL
then the back water in the Almatti dam will raise only up to 500 (exactly 495) mts AMSL Any water
which is more than 500 mts AMSL will enter back in the FPC1 But the almatti dam will always be
able to relaease the water to both Karnataka and Andrapradesh what what ever amount they need
Here the total water availability 2293tmc and the allotted water to Andrapradesh 1001tmc and to
Karnataka is 911tmc Maharastra 666tmc With RCS the total water available becomes 10000 or
even more TMC and the states like Andrapradesh Karnataka and Maharastra can use 2000TMC or
even more if they want because the FPC1 will be continuously filled by the ri vers like Ganga ndash
Yamuna ndash Mahanadhi ndash Narnmada- Godhavari ndash Kaveri ndash and Krishna it iself
Thus we need not increase the height of the almatti dam lsquoin this instance onlyrsquo Increasing the height
of the dam may be the necessity in another instance that we need to discuss as such issues arises
Sources
[34] Britannica Concise Encyclopedia answerscom Wikipedia
[37] Deccan herald Mangalore Friday december31 2010 And Prajavani Kannada daily news paper
Mangalore Friday December 31 2010
Yeldari on Purna River Near Parbhani
Siddheshwar on Purna River Near Parbhani
Manar On River Manar Near Nanded
Girna On River Girna
Chaskaman On River Bhima Near Rajgurunagar
Pravara On River Godavari
Isapur Dam on River Painganga River
Bhadardara On River Pravara
Meghalaya
Umiam Lake
Orissa
Balimela Reservoir
Hirakud Dam on Mahanadi River near Sambalpur
Balimela Reservoir
Jalaput on Machkund River near Jaypore Koraput District
Indravati Dam on river Indravati in kalahandi district
Salia dam on river Kharkhari in Ganjam District
Tamil Nadu
Aliyar Reservoir
Amaravathi Reservoir
Amaravathi Dam
Anaikuttam Reservoir
Anainaduvu Reservoir
Bhavanisagar Reservoir
Chittar Reservoir
Chittar Reservoir-1
Chittar Reservoir-2
Gatana Reservoir
Golwarpatti Reservoir
Gomukhinadhi Reservoir
Gundar Reservoir
Gunderippalam Reservoir
Kariakoil Reservoir
Karupppanadhi Reservoir
Kelavarapalli Reservoir
Kesarigulihalla Reservoir
Kodaganar Reservoir
Kovilar Reservoir
Krishnagiri Reservoir
Kullursandai Reservoir
Kutharaiyar Reservoir
Lower Nirar Reservoir
Manimukthanadhi Reservoir
Manimuthar Reservoir
Manjalar Reservoir
Marudhanadhi Reservoir
Mettur Dam
Nagavathi Reservoir
Noyyal Oarathuppalayam
Palar Porandalar Reservoir
Pambar Reservoir
Parambikulam Reservoir
Parappalar Reservoir
Pechiparai Reservoir
Periyar Reservoir (Pilavukkal Project)
Periyar Reservoir
Perumpallam Reservoir
Perunchani Reservoir
Peruvaripallam
Ponnaniar Reservoir
Ramanadhi Reservoir
Sathanur Reservoir
Sholayar Reservoir
Siddhamalli Reservoir
Soolagiri chinnar Reservoir
Stanley Reservoir
Thambalahalli Reservoir
Thirumurthi Reservoir
Thoppaiyar Reservoir
Thunakadavu Reservoir
Uppar Reservoir
Upper Nirar Wier
Vaigai Dam
Vaigai Reservoir
Vaniyar Reservoir
Varadamanadhi Reservoir
Varattupallam Reservoir
Vattamalaikarai Odai Reservoir
Vembakottai Reservoir
Vidur Reservoir
Willingdon Reservoir
Uttar Pradesh
Govind Ballabh Pant Sagar on Rihand River in Sonbhadra
Kalagarh Dam on Ramganga River in Kalagarh
Parichha Dam on Betwa River in Parichha (Jhansi District)
List of Dams in Lalitpur District Uttar Pradesh
o (A) Matatila Dam constructed during 1952-1964 on Betwa River in Lalitpur District Uttar Pradesh
Length 630 km Height 3353 Meters Area 20720 Sqkm Storage 113268 Mcm
o (B) Jamni Dam constructed during 1962-1973 on Jamni River in Lalitpur District Uttar Pradesh
Length 640 km Height 1918 Meters Area 414 Sqkm Storage 9289 Mcm
o (C) Rohini Dam constructed during 1976-1984 on Rohini River in Lalitpur District Uttar Pradesh
Length 165km Height 1550 Meters Area 44 Sqkm Storage 1212 Mcm
o (D) Shahzad Dam constructed during 1973-1992 on Shahzad River in Lalitpur District Uttar
Pradesh Length 416 km Height 1800 Meters Area 514 Sqkm Storage 13000 Mcm
o (E) Govind Sagar Dam constructed during 1947-1953 on Shahzad River in Lalitpur District Uttar
Pradesh Length 360 km Height 1829 Meters Area 368 Sqkm Storage 968 Mcm
o (F) Sajnam Dam constructed during 1977-1990 on Sajnam River in Lalitpur District Uttar Pradesh
Length 515 km Height 1878 Meters Area 290 Sqkm Storage 8350 Mcm
o (G) Sukma-Dukma Dam a below water construction on Betwa River near Jhansi District Uttar
Pradesh Length 215 km Height 2078 Meters
Uttarakhand
Tehri dam
Dhauli ganga dam
Sriram Sagar
Devadula Lift Irrigation Project
Kaddam
Manjira Reservoir
Lower Tirna
Purna
Upper PenGanga
Lower Dudhana
Jayakwadi Dam
Bhandara Reservoir
Mula Reservoir
Upper Pravara
Upper Indravati Project
Godavari Canal
Upper WainGanga
Majalgaon irrigation project is located in the Godavari river basin in the state of Maharashtra
West Bengal
Panchet Dam
Dam projects
Narmada Dam Project
Banasura Sagar Dam - Banasurasagar Project
Noyyal River - Tanks System
Farakka Barrage
Source [34] ]
All the dams and the areas which are below the level of 500mts AMSL except in the states of Jammu
and Kashmir Northestern states will get the water form RCS and the principle feeders will be the
Ganga and the Yamuna
All the dams and the areas which are below the level of 300mts AMSL except in the states of Jammu
and Kashmir Northestern states will get the water form RCS and the principle feeders will be the
Brahamaputra for the RCS
All the dams and the areas which are below the level of 900mts AMSL in south deccan platue
especially the southern districts of Karnataka western districts of Andra Pradesh and Tamilnadu will
get the water from the RCS and the principle feeders will be the River Kavery
All the dams and the areas which are below the level of 800mts AMSL in north India like states of
Punjab Haryana Himachal Pradesh Delhi northern district of Uttarpradesh Bihar which are north
to the course of Ganga and Yamuna will get the water from the RCS and the principle feeders will be
the Ganaga and Yamuna Rivers
62 FampF ndash Projects across River kosi [Kosi River
Development scenario
Multipurpose projects
After India attained independence in August 1947 the development scenario in India has been
resolute on technological development In keeping with this approach the National Flood Control
Policy in 1954 (following the disastrous floods of 1954 in a large part of the Koshi river basin) stated
that floods could be controlled through a series of flood protection works like dams embankments
and river training works One such work which drew the immediate attention of the policy planners
after independence was a solution to the recurring flood menace faced by people of North Bihar due
to the Kosi and other rivers flowing from Nepal to India The Kosi project was thus conceptualized
(based on investigations between 1946 to 1955) in three continuous interlinked stages ndash the first
was a barrage to anchor this wayward river that had migrated about 120 km (75 mi) westward in the
last 250 years laying waste to a huge tract in north Bihar and to provide irrigation and power
benefits to Nepal and India The second part was to build embankments both below and above the
barrage so as to jacket the river within the defined channel The third part envisaged a high
multipurpose dam within Nepal at Barakshetra to provide substantial flood cushion along with large
irrigation and power benefits to both countries This was followed up by signing of the Kosi
Agreement between Nepal and India on 25 April 1954 and which was revised on 19 December 1966
to address the concerns of Nepal Further letters of Exchange to the Agreement between the two
countries provided for additional schemes for providing benefits of irri gation While the first two
parts of the concept plan have been implemented at the cost of the Government of India the third
part namely the Koshi High dam the kingpin of the whole concept for various political reasons
precluded any action for several years but has since been revived under a fresh agreement in a
modified form for further investigations and studies
Details of the above projects are elaborated below
Kosi barrage and irrigation
Kosi Barrage also called Bhimnagar Barrage after the name of the place where it was built between
the years 1959 and 1963 straddles the Indo-Nepal border It is an irrigation flood control and
hydropower generation project on the Kosi river built under a bilateral agreement between Nepal
and India the entire cost of the project was borne by India The catchment area of the river is
61788 km2 (23856 sq mi) in Nepal at the Barrage site The highest peaks ndash the Mount Everest and
the Mount Kanchenjunga mdash lie in its catchment About 10 of this catchment is snow-fed The
Eastern Canal and the Western Canal taking off from the barrage have been designed for a discharge
capacity of 455 cubic metres per second (16100 cu fts) to irrigate 6125 square kilometres
(1514000 acres) and 210 cubic metres per second (7400 cu fts) to irrigate 35661 square
kilometres (881200 acres) respectively A hydropower plant has been built on the Eastern Canal at
a canal drop (36 km (22 mi) from the Koshi Barrage) to generate 20 MW The Western Kosi Canal
provides irrigation to 250 square kilometres (62000 acres) in Nepal A valuable bridge over the
barrage opened up the East-West highway in the eastern sector of Nepal
An inundation canal taking off at Chatra where the Kosi debouches into the plains has been built to
irrigate a gross area of 860 kmsup2 in Nepal The project has been renovated with IDA assistance after
Nepal took over the project in 1976
Silt deposition near Kosi embankment at Navbhata Saharsa Bihar India
Kosi embankment system
The Kosi barrage with earth dams across river afflux bunds and embankments above and below the
river confines the river to flow within embankments Embankments on both sides downstream of
the barrage with a length of 246 km (153 mi) has been constructed to check the westward
movement of the river The embankments have been kept wide apart about 12 to 16 km (99 mi) to
serve as a silt trap
Sapta Kosi High Multipurpose Project (Indo-Nepal)
Government of India (GOI) and His Majestys Government of Nepal (HMGN) have agreed to conduct
joint investigations and other studies for the preparation of Detailed Project Report (DPR) of Sapta
Kosi High Dam Multipurpose Project and Sun Kosi Storage-cum-Diversion Scheme to meet the
objectives of both the countries for Development of a) hydropower generation b) irrigation c) flood
controlmanagement and d) navigation
A 269-metre (880 ft) high concreteRock fill dam on the Sapta Koshi River with a dam toe
underground power house with an installed capacity of 3000 MW at 50 load factor a barrage on
river Sapta Kosi about 8 km (50 mi) downstream of Sapta Kosi High Dam to re-regulate the water
being released from the Sapta Koshi dam with two canals Eastern Chhatra Canal and Western
Chhatra Canal off-taking from the either bank from barrage site to provide water for irrigation both
in Nepal and India and Navigation through Koshi up to Kursela and also in the reservoir of Sapta
Koshi dam are envisaged
A Power Canal off-taking from the Eastern Chatra Canal is proposed for conveying the water
required for irrigation at existing Kosi barrage at Hanuman Nagar and also the water which may be
required downstream of Hanuman Nagar Barrage for the purpose of navigation To utilize the head
available between Chatra and Hanuman Nagar barrages for power generation three canal Power
Houses each of 100 MW installed capacity are also proposed on power canal
Necessary cushion in storage capacity of Sapta Kosi High Dam would be provided to moderate the
flood downstream of dam
Chatra Canal System would provide irrigation to large areas in Nepal and India (particularly in Bihar)
A Joint Project Office (JPO) has been set up in Nepal for investigation of the project
Hydropower
Nepal has a total estimated potential of 83290 MW out of which economically exploitable potential
is 42140 MW The Koshi river basin contributes 22350 MW of this potential(360 MW from small
schemes and 1875 MW from major schemes) and the economically exploitable potential is assessd
as 10860 MW (includes the Sapta Koshi Multipurpose Project [3300MW] mentioned above) Source [34]]
Damages to the canal ndash embankment ndash hydroelectrical projects are the possibilities if we create the
projects at places where we can expect high flow in short time of period It is better to target the
water at higher level before they unite and form big volume of water at one point
63 FampF ndash Irrigation projects along the river Godavari
[Godavari River Basin Irrigation Projects
Godavari River Delta
The Godavari River has its catchment area in five states of India Maharashtra Chattisgarh Madhya
Pradesh Andhra Pradesh Karnataka and Orissa
Dowleswaram Barrage
Jalaput
Balimela Reservoir
Upper Indravati
Nizam Sagar
Dams and bridges along the river
A barrage was built on the river at Dowleswaram was built by Sir Arthur Cotton in 1850 It was
rebuilt as a barrage and roadway during 1980s and named after him The roadway connects
Dowleswaram in East Godavari and Vijjeswaram in West Godavari
There is also a big dam built just after the source of the river at Trimbakeshwar The dam is in the
town of Gangapur which literally means a town on a river The dam provides drinking water to the
residents of Nashik and also supplies water to the thermal power station situated downstream at
Eklahara which provides power to the town
There is another multipurpose project on the Godavari River named Sri Ram Sagar Project in
Nizamabad District It is in the town of Pochampad 60km away from Nizamabad It irrigates 4
districts of Northern Telangana Region of Andhra Pradesh and supplies power
The Jayakwadi dam near Paithan is one of the largest earthen dam in India This dam was built to
address the problem of drought in Marathwada region and problem of flood along the bank of river
Two left and right canals provide the irrigation to fertile land up to Nanded district This dam has
major contribution in industrial development of Aurangabad
Source [34]]
All the dams which are at the level of 500mts AMSL will receive the water from FPC1 and thoses at
or below the level of 300mts AMSL will receive the water from FPC4
64 FampF ndash Narmada river water projects
[Narmada River
Narmada river development (NRD)
The Narmada river has a huge water resources potential as much as 3321 MAF (41000 Mcum) of
average annual flow (more than 90 of this flow occurring during the monsoon months of June ndash
September) which according to estimates is greater than the combined annual flows of the Ravi
Beas and the Sutlej rivers which feed the Indus basin The 75 dependable flow is 28 MAF (34537
MCM) Till the beginning of planned development in the country was started in 1946 this huge
potential went almost abegging without any effective utilization thus denying much needed succour
to the drought stricken people of the valley both in Madhya Pradesh and Gujarat Since then plans
have been evolved debated finally legally examined and adjudicated by a tribunal agitated by
NGOs The Supreme Court has finally intervened to ensure that the implementation of the projects is
not halted
Early background and dispute
Investigations for harnessing the Narmada waters started around the time of independence when
Central Waterways Irrigation and Navigation Commission) (CWINC) identified several storage
schemes and in 1948 the Khosla Committee prioritized the proposals and named Tawa Bargi
Punasa and Bharuch projects (the last three on the main stem of the river) for preparation of
reports The reports were ready by 1963 A parallel study of the Hydropower potential identified 16
sites with a potential of 1300 MW While the project in Gujarat called Baruch Weir project (for which
Jawaharlal Nehru laid the foundation stone in 1961) went through a series of modifications and
improvements with a reformed scheme at Navagam village to extend benefits up to the Rann of
Kutch but following the bifurcation of the erstwhile Bombay state into Maharashtra and Gujarat
states and Gujaratrsquos intent to raise the height of the dam at Navagam to maximize storage benefits
at the cost of submergence of potential hydropower sites in Maharashtra and Madhya Pradesh
created a dispute between the states This resulted in an impasse in the implementation o f the
agreed projects at Navagam in Gujarat Punasa in MP and Bargi dam in MP and power benefit
sharing among the states with MP refusing to ratify the agreements To break the logjam a high
level Committee was appointed by the Govt of India in Septembe r 1964 In 1965 the Committee
prepared a Master Plan for the basin which involved construction of 12 major projects in MP and the
Navagam dam in Gujarat It provided irrigation priority over power irrigation of 2630 kmsup2 in MP
400 kmsup2 in Maharashtra 1850 kmsup2 in Gujarat and 4000 kmsup2 in Rajasthan The storages it
recommended in MP involved Bargi Tawa and Narmadasagar (Punasa) while its proposed Navagam
high dam would submerge the hydelpower project sites of Jalasindhi (in Maharshtra) and Harinphal
(MP) but without any more submergence than would be caused by the three dams if separately
constructed Gujarat endorsed this proposal but Maharashtra was not willing to go by it After
intense parleys failed to resolve the problem GOI decided to set up the Narmada Water Disputes
Tribunal (NWDT) in 1969 under the Inter State Water Disputes Act 1956 to adjudicate on the
dispute relating to sharing of water of the inter-state river Narmada and its valley
Tribunal award After ten years of deliberations the Narmada Water Disputes Tribunal (NWDT) gave
its award in December 1979 The NWDT considering the development of the water resources of the
basin as a whole gave its award allocating share of water (after accepting the mutually agreed
settlement among the four party states in 1974 on sharing of the waters of Narmada on the basis
of a determination by the Tribunal of the height of the Navagam dam or the Sardar Sarovar dam)
and Hydro Power of the Sardar Sarovar Project
The Tribunalrsquos final order determined the utilizable quantum of Narmada waters to be 27 million
acre feet at 75 dependability and allocated it to the four states as in Table below including share
of power benefits It also stipulated the share of water when utilizable flow was in excess of 28
million acre feet The Navagam dam height was fixed at FRL 460 feet (140 m) with a maximum water
level of EL feet The Full Supply Level of the Navagam canal was fixed at 300 feet (91 m) The cost
sharing formula among the states and the consequent requirement of release of regulated releases
from the Narmada Sagar dam by MP was also spelt out The resettlement and rehabilitation package
was also clearly specified with all costs to be borne by Gujarat for all resettlement and rehabilitation
work of people affected in the three states and also for relocating any ancient or historic
monuments places of worship or idols likely to suffer submergence
Party state Alloted share of
water in million
acre feet (MAF)
share of
power
Madya Pradesh 1825 57
Gujarath 9 16
Maharastra 025 27
Rajastan 05 Nil
Total 28 100
The uniqueness of this Award is that a non riparian state ndash Rajasthan ndash has been allocated a share of
Narmada waters for meeting the water requirements of the drought prone districts of Barmer and
Jalore which have no other source of dependable water
Go ahead for the projects The work on the project did not start soon since extensive studies were
undertaken for project designing and with World Bank getting involved with funding studies and
project costs (Loan agreement with GOI of $450 million was signed in May 1985) the Resettlement
and Rehabilitation package was substantially revised over and above what was set in the NWDT
and environmental studies had to be undertaken But the environmental and forest cle arances for
the projects from the newly formed Ministry of Environment and Forests (MoEampF) involved
extensive inter-ministerial and inter departmental discussions (within the central govt and with state
govts) for a substantial period and it was only in June 1987 (almost 8 years after the NWDT award
was given in Dec 1979) that the MoEampF gave a conditional approval to the Sardar Sarovar and
Narmada Sagar Projects The Forest clearance was given in September 1987 for Sardar Sarovar only
The clearance also required the work to be done pari passu with the construction of the dams and
the filling of the reservoir In the mean time the Narmada Control Authority (NCA) an inter-State
Administrative Authority and the Sardar Sarovar Construction Advisory Committee (SSCAC) were set
up in 1980 by the Govt of India in compliance of the NWDT award the former organization was set
up in Dec 1980 as body corporate with representatives from the four party states and Govt of India
as a machinery to implement the decisions and directions of the NWDT and the later organization
was set up in Sept 1980 as a statutory body to ensure efficient economical and timely execution of
the Unit I (Dam amp appurtenant works) and Unit III (Hydropower works) of the Sardar Sarovar Project
(SSP) A Review Committee consisting of the Union Minister for Irrigation (now substituted by Union
Minister for Water Resources) as its Chairperson and the Chief Ministers of Madhya Pradesh
Maharashtra Gujarat and Rajasthan as its members is also in position to review the decisions of the
NCA and the SSCAC as required For monitoring and implementation of various environmental
activities effectively independent machinery of Environment Sub-Group is functioning since
Nov1987 under NCA Similarly for monitoring the progress of the resettlement and rehabilitation of
project affected people RampR subgroup is also functioning under the NCA At the state level Sardar
Sarovar Narmada Nigam Limited (SSNL) in Gujarat has the mandate to implement and manage the
Sardar Sarovar multipurpose project In Madhya Pradesh the Narmada Valley Development
Authority (NVDA) is vested the responsibility for implementation of the projects
Narmada River
Layout of Water Resources Development Projects in the Narmada Basin in Gujarat amp Madhya
Pradesh
Even though the tribunal award resolved the initial issue of water sharing however the height of
dam benefit sharing and the mode of settlement of project-affected people caused serious
difficulties in implementation particularly of the Sardar Sarovar dam (the terminal dam on the river)
Project-affected people agitated under the banner of the dedicated NGO - The Narmada Bachao
Andolan (NBA) The NBA followed up by Public Interest Litigation (PIL) in the Supreme Court The
NBA questioned the benefits claimed from the major projects challenged the resettlement and
rehabilitation packages for project affected people of the reservoir submergence and canal affected
zones and its implementation It also rejected the environmental impact assessments made and the
remedial actions taken by the project authorities This challenge created worldwide attention to the
major development activity planned in the valley It urged the World Bank to withdraw from the
project and the intense world wide pressure resulted in the Bank mounting an Independent Review
Mission (IRM) called the Morse Mission to review the SSP But the IRMrsquos report was neither
accepted by the Government of India or the World Bank Finally Government of India decided to
terminate further drawals from a remaining $180 million World Bank credit from the Bank with the
firm resolution that the project would be completed within the national resources
The Supreme Court has also deliberated on this issue for several years but finally upheld the Tribunal
Award and allowed the construction to proceed subject to conditions The Court introduced a
mechanism to monitor the progress of resettlement pari-passu with the raising of the height of the
dam through Grievance Redressal Authorities (GRA) in each of the party states The courtrsquos decision
referred in this document given in the year 2000 after 7 years of deliberations has paved the way
for completing the project to attain full envisaged benefits Some of the courtrsquos decisions are
essential to be quoted here (quoted in italics) to set at rest many of the distorted or incorrect
versions being presented in several of the linked Wikipedia articles on this subject
The overall plan for development ultimately conceived involves 30 major dams including Sardar
Sarovar (21 irrigation 5 hydropower and 4 multipurpose) some 135 medium dams and over three
minor dams in MP along the main stem of the river and its 41 tributaries to utilize its allocated share
of 1825 MAF before 2025 (within 45 years of the NWDT award) In addition to power generation
and irrigation within the basin water was allocated for domestic and industrial water uses and for
multipurpose trans-basin diversions to Son and Tons basins in eastern MP drought prone areas of
Saurashtra Kutch northern mainland in Gujarat and southern Rajasthan Irrigation benefits to the
extent of about 40000 to 50000 kmsup2 (of drought prone and scarcity areas) and power generation of
2600 MW were also envisaged Thus the Narmada river development is envisaged as a multi state
program for development of hydropower and irrigation dams and their associated irrigation
networks
Justice Bharucha stated that Considering the magnitude of rehabilitation involving a large
percentage of tribals loss of extensive forest area rich in biological diversity enormous
environmental cost of the project and considering the fact that the basic data on vital aspects are
still not available there could be but one conclusion that the project(s) are not ready for approval
Sardar Sarovar Project (SSP) at Navagam Subsequent to the Tribunal award and approval to the
project in 1987 by the Ministry of Water Resources with due clearances from the MoEampF
implementation of the SSP was taken up as the terminal project on the main stem of the Narmada
in Gujarat to utilize the share of allocated water to Gujarat and Rajasthan The concrete gravity dam
of 1210 m length and 163 m height above foundation with storage capacity of 77 million acre -feet
and reservoir length of 213 m extending into Gujarat Maharashtra and Madhya Pradesh is designed
to provide an annual irrigation of 18000 kmsup2 in Gujarat (covering 3360 villages of 62 talukas in 14
districts) 4260 kmsup2 in Rajasthan and hydel power generation of 1450 MW As a result of
construction of the dam over 48269 families (against 7000 families assessed in 1979 by the
Tribunal) will be affected as per the latest figures of NCA in the three States spread over 244
villages (4 fully and 240 partially - 39369 in MP in 192 villages 4163 in Maharshtra in 33 villages and
4737 in Gujarat in 19 villages) the total area affected being 37533 kmsup2 The submergence area is
broadly divided into two areas fully tribal area which covers the initial reach of about 100 or so
villages which are almost 100 tribal and hilly These include al l the 33 villages of Maharashtra (in
Nadurbar district) all 19 of Gujarat and many of the Madhya Pradesh The second part of the
submergence area is the mixed population area on the Nimad plains with a very well developed
economy that is well connected to the mainstream Considered as the largest water resources
project of India in terms of benefits some of the special features of the project are the following
Damrsquos spillway discharging capacity (307 million cusecs) is the 3rd highest in the world
With 1133 msup3s (40000 ftsup3s) capacity at the head regulator and 532 km length (458 km in
Gujarat and 74 km in Rajasthan) with 75000 km length of distribution system including field
channel the Narmada Main Canal is the largest irrigation canal in the world
The project aims at supplying 3571000 msup3day of drinking water (2900000 msup3day for domestic
consumption amp 671000 msup3day for industrial consumption) to 8215 villages amp 135 towns in Gujarat
which are presently suffering from acute shortage of water Also the project aims to provide
drinking water facilities to a population of about 1371000 in 1107 villages amp two towns in Jallore amp
Barmer districts of Rajasthan
Has the lowest ratio of submergence to area irrigated ndash being 165 of CCA against an average of
4 to 5 of other major irrigation projects
All the 6 units of River Bed Power House (RBPH) have been commissioned successfully by June 2006
and are in operation All the five units of Canal Head Power House (CHPH) have been commissioned
successfully by end of December 2004 and are in operation
The construction of the two multipurpose major projects - the Sardar Sarvoar in Gujarat and Indira
Sagar in Madya Pradesh - the two are interdependent to attain full envisaged benefits - is in progress
and substantial partial benefits have already been achieved Hence details of these two projects are
elaborated below
Sardar Sarovar Dam Gujarat partially completed (up to EL12192 m)
Largest lined canal in the World Sardar Sarovar Project
The dam has attained a height of EL12192 m ie the crest level of the spillway The gates are yet to
be erected to attain the FRL of EL 13868 m for which clearance is required from the Supreme Court
after the Grievance Redressal Committee submits its report on completion of R amp R up to that
elevation Top level of dam to be attained is EL 14650 m
The main irrigation canal has been substantially constructed for a length of 357 km Water has been
let into the canal for partial irrigation and water supply needs Further construction is in progress
Indira Sagar Project (ISP) in Madhya Pradesh at Punasa is one of the 30 major projects proposed in
the Narmada basin with the largest storage capacity in the country The project is located near
Punasa village in Khandwa District of Madhya Pradesh This Multipurpose River Valley Project
envisages construction of a concrete gravity dam 653 m long and 92 m high with gross storage
capacity of the reservoir of 1222 kmsup3 (99 MAF) and live storage of 975 kmsup3 (79MAF) to provide an
annual irrigation potential of 1690 kmsup2 and generation of 1000 MW of hydropower The project
shall also ensure supply of 006 MAF (74000000 msup3) of drinking water to rural areas in Khandwa
district In accordance with NWDT award an annual regulated flow of 812 MAF (10015 kmsup3) shall
be released to the Sardar Sarovar Project (SSP) ex-Maheshwar Project The operation of Indira Sagar
Project shall be carried out in such a way as to facilitate the regulation of Sardar Sarovar
Indira Sagar dam partially completed in Madhya Pradesh
Indira Sagar canal for irrigation
The dam and the powerhouse have been completed but storage has been restricted up to EL 260 m
under orders of the High Court Jabalpur from RampR consideration All the units of the powerhouse
have been commissioned and generation of power from the 8 units of 125 MW capacity each
commenced from Jan 2004[25]The irrigation component of the project is under a fairly advance
stage of implementation
Other completed and under construction projects Existing irrigation projects in the Narmada are the
1) Matiyari (1992) 2) Rani Avantibai Sagar (1988) 3) Barna (1978) 4) Tawa (1992-93) 5) Sukta
(1984) all in Madhya Pradesh and Karjan project in Gujarat
Projects under implementation are the 1) Bargi diversion 2) Kolar 3) Man 4) Omkareshwar
multipurpose (520 MW ndash commissioned in Nov 2007) and 5) Maheshwar (400 MW)
A large number of medium and small projects have been completed and many more are under
implementation as conceived under the overall Master Plan
Source [34]]
With the establishment of RCS all the dams and the hydroelectrical projects will get sufficient water
from the FPC1 and the West extension of FPC1 in this scenario if the levels of these projects are less
than 500 meters AMSL Problems like lsquohigh the magnitude of rehabilitation involving a large
percentage of tribals loss of extensive forest area rich in biological diversity enormous
environmental cost of the projectrsquo will not appear with RCS and all the states coming under this issue
like Madyapradesh Maharastra Gujarath and Rajastan will get more than sufficient water for
irrigation ndash industry ndash hydroelectrical projects ndash for domestic purposes
The cost will be less since (1) it involves only the creation of primary channel (2) there is no
necessity to construct the dams (3) there is no necessity to rehabilitate the people in a great way
since RCS involves very minimal area (4) no immersion of land like city and forest area in back water
in a bigger way (5) we may be creating U tubes in depressed lands in the course of primary channel
or the bi dam in a minimally depressed area but there is no back water issues in these and hence
land involved and rehabilitation are going to be less
All the water are used effectively and no water will enter the Arabian sea without being used
effectively over the land that is the more water generated beyond the storing capacity of the dam in
the rainy seasons will be effectively utilized all over the nation in the lands below 500 mts AMSL
65 FampF ndashWater dispute ndash Height of almatti dam
[Water disputes
Height of almatti dam
State gets a good deal Tribunal gives nod to raise Almatti dam height to 52425 meters
New Delhi In what could be a major relief to Karnataka the Krishna water disputes tribunal -2 has
allowed the state to build the Almatti dam up to the originally proposed height of 52425 meters
Major decisions Karnataka allowed to increase almatti dam height from 519 meters to 52425
meters Krishna waters decision Implementation Board to be set up will monitor flows Releases to
be monitored every 10 days Karnataka should release 8 to 10 tmc to AP in June and July Award to
come up for review in 2050
Water allocations Total water availability 2293tmc Andrapradesh 1001tmc Karnataka 911tmc
maharastra666tmc
This judgment has been given after 43 years of proceedings Source [37] ]
It is true by increasing the height of the dam from 519 to 52425 mts It is possible to store more
water that we can use it later
But what is the use if we are not getting sufficient water to fill the dam in one rain year As per the
calculation the total available water is 2293 TMC Andrapradesh is more benefitted from this
because there is more land available for agriculture and more population is going to be benefited If
the water generated is less then both the states are under loss The level of water (Height) in the
dam depends on the rain in the catchment area (Inflow) and the utilization in the process of
agriculture and others (out flow) If the inflow is steady throughout the year and the out flow is also
steady then both the states are going to be benefitted If we increase the height of the dam then we
may be storing more water but the back water may immerse more inhabited areas and it may
extend in the neighboring states like maharastra and other interstate issues and problems of
rehabilitation will arise
With RCS all such problems will be solved If we are creating the FPC1 at the level of 500mts AMSL
then the back water in the Almatti dam will raise only up to 500 (exactly 495) mts AMSL Any water
which is more than 500 mts AMSL will enter back in the FPC1 But the almatti dam will always be
able to relaease the water to both Karnataka and Andrapradesh what what ever amount they need
Here the total water availability 2293tmc and the allotted water to Andrapradesh 1001tmc and to
Karnataka is 911tmc Maharastra 666tmc With RCS the total water available becomes 10000 or
even more TMC and the states like Andrapradesh Karnataka and Maharastra can use 2000TMC or
even more if they want because the FPC1 will be continuously filled by the ri vers like Ganga ndash
Yamuna ndash Mahanadhi ndash Narnmada- Godhavari ndash Kaveri ndash and Krishna it iself
Thus we need not increase the height of the almatti dam lsquoin this instance onlyrsquo Increasing the height
of the dam may be the necessity in another instance that we need to discuss as such issues arises
Sources
[34] Britannica Concise Encyclopedia answerscom Wikipedia
[37] Deccan herald Mangalore Friday december31 2010 And Prajavani Kannada daily news paper
Mangalore Friday December 31 2010
Kullursandai Reservoir
Kutharaiyar Reservoir
Lower Nirar Reservoir
Manimukthanadhi Reservoir
Manimuthar Reservoir
Manjalar Reservoir
Marudhanadhi Reservoir
Mettur Dam
Nagavathi Reservoir
Noyyal Oarathuppalayam
Palar Porandalar Reservoir
Pambar Reservoir
Parambikulam Reservoir
Parappalar Reservoir
Pechiparai Reservoir
Periyar Reservoir (Pilavukkal Project)
Periyar Reservoir
Perumpallam Reservoir
Perunchani Reservoir
Peruvaripallam
Ponnaniar Reservoir
Ramanadhi Reservoir
Sathanur Reservoir
Sholayar Reservoir
Siddhamalli Reservoir
Soolagiri chinnar Reservoir
Stanley Reservoir
Thambalahalli Reservoir
Thirumurthi Reservoir
Thoppaiyar Reservoir
Thunakadavu Reservoir
Uppar Reservoir
Upper Nirar Wier
Vaigai Dam
Vaigai Reservoir
Vaniyar Reservoir
Varadamanadhi Reservoir
Varattupallam Reservoir
Vattamalaikarai Odai Reservoir
Vembakottai Reservoir
Vidur Reservoir
Willingdon Reservoir
Uttar Pradesh
Govind Ballabh Pant Sagar on Rihand River in Sonbhadra
Kalagarh Dam on Ramganga River in Kalagarh
Parichha Dam on Betwa River in Parichha (Jhansi District)
List of Dams in Lalitpur District Uttar Pradesh
o (A) Matatila Dam constructed during 1952-1964 on Betwa River in Lalitpur District Uttar Pradesh
Length 630 km Height 3353 Meters Area 20720 Sqkm Storage 113268 Mcm
o (B) Jamni Dam constructed during 1962-1973 on Jamni River in Lalitpur District Uttar Pradesh
Length 640 km Height 1918 Meters Area 414 Sqkm Storage 9289 Mcm
o (C) Rohini Dam constructed during 1976-1984 on Rohini River in Lalitpur District Uttar Pradesh
Length 165km Height 1550 Meters Area 44 Sqkm Storage 1212 Mcm
o (D) Shahzad Dam constructed during 1973-1992 on Shahzad River in Lalitpur District Uttar
Pradesh Length 416 km Height 1800 Meters Area 514 Sqkm Storage 13000 Mcm
o (E) Govind Sagar Dam constructed during 1947-1953 on Shahzad River in Lalitpur District Uttar
Pradesh Length 360 km Height 1829 Meters Area 368 Sqkm Storage 968 Mcm
o (F) Sajnam Dam constructed during 1977-1990 on Sajnam River in Lalitpur District Uttar Pradesh
Length 515 km Height 1878 Meters Area 290 Sqkm Storage 8350 Mcm
o (G) Sukma-Dukma Dam a below water construction on Betwa River near Jhansi District Uttar
Pradesh Length 215 km Height 2078 Meters
Uttarakhand
Tehri dam
Dhauli ganga dam
Sriram Sagar
Devadula Lift Irrigation Project
Kaddam
Manjira Reservoir
Lower Tirna
Purna
Upper PenGanga
Lower Dudhana
Jayakwadi Dam
Bhandara Reservoir
Mula Reservoir
Upper Pravara
Upper Indravati Project
Godavari Canal
Upper WainGanga
Majalgaon irrigation project is located in the Godavari river basin in the state of Maharashtra
West Bengal
Panchet Dam
Dam projects
Narmada Dam Project
Banasura Sagar Dam - Banasurasagar Project
Noyyal River - Tanks System
Farakka Barrage
Source [34] ]
All the dams and the areas which are below the level of 500mts AMSL except in the states of Jammu
and Kashmir Northestern states will get the water form RCS and the principle feeders will be the
Ganga and the Yamuna
All the dams and the areas which are below the level of 300mts AMSL except in the states of Jammu
and Kashmir Northestern states will get the water form RCS and the principle feeders will be the
Brahamaputra for the RCS
All the dams and the areas which are below the level of 900mts AMSL in south deccan platue
especially the southern districts of Karnataka western districts of Andra Pradesh and Tamilnadu will
get the water from the RCS and the principle feeders will be the River Kavery
All the dams and the areas which are below the level of 800mts AMSL in north India like states of
Punjab Haryana Himachal Pradesh Delhi northern district of Uttarpradesh Bihar which are north
to the course of Ganga and Yamuna will get the water from the RCS and the principle feeders will be
the Ganaga and Yamuna Rivers
62 FampF ndash Projects across River kosi [Kosi River
Development scenario
Multipurpose projects
After India attained independence in August 1947 the development scenario in India has been
resolute on technological development In keeping with this approach the National Flood Control
Policy in 1954 (following the disastrous floods of 1954 in a large part of the Koshi river basin) stated
that floods could be controlled through a series of flood protection works like dams embankments
and river training works One such work which drew the immediate attention of the policy planners
after independence was a solution to the recurring flood menace faced by people of North Bihar due
to the Kosi and other rivers flowing from Nepal to India The Kosi project was thus conceptualized
(based on investigations between 1946 to 1955) in three continuous interlinked stages ndash the first
was a barrage to anchor this wayward river that had migrated about 120 km (75 mi) westward in the
last 250 years laying waste to a huge tract in north Bihar and to provide irrigation and power
benefits to Nepal and India The second part was to build embankments both below and above the
barrage so as to jacket the river within the defined channel The third part envisaged a high
multipurpose dam within Nepal at Barakshetra to provide substantial flood cushion along with large
irrigation and power benefits to both countries This was followed up by signing of the Kosi
Agreement between Nepal and India on 25 April 1954 and which was revised on 19 December 1966
to address the concerns of Nepal Further letters of Exchange to the Agreement between the two
countries provided for additional schemes for providing benefits of irri gation While the first two
parts of the concept plan have been implemented at the cost of the Government of India the third
part namely the Koshi High dam the kingpin of the whole concept for various political reasons
precluded any action for several years but has since been revived under a fresh agreement in a
modified form for further investigations and studies
Details of the above projects are elaborated below
Kosi barrage and irrigation
Kosi Barrage also called Bhimnagar Barrage after the name of the place where it was built between
the years 1959 and 1963 straddles the Indo-Nepal border It is an irrigation flood control and
hydropower generation project on the Kosi river built under a bilateral agreement between Nepal
and India the entire cost of the project was borne by India The catchment area of the river is
61788 km2 (23856 sq mi) in Nepal at the Barrage site The highest peaks ndash the Mount Everest and
the Mount Kanchenjunga mdash lie in its catchment About 10 of this catchment is snow-fed The
Eastern Canal and the Western Canal taking off from the barrage have been designed for a discharge
capacity of 455 cubic metres per second (16100 cu fts) to irrigate 6125 square kilometres
(1514000 acres) and 210 cubic metres per second (7400 cu fts) to irrigate 35661 square
kilometres (881200 acres) respectively A hydropower plant has been built on the Eastern Canal at
a canal drop (36 km (22 mi) from the Koshi Barrage) to generate 20 MW The Western Kosi Canal
provides irrigation to 250 square kilometres (62000 acres) in Nepal A valuable bridge over the
barrage opened up the East-West highway in the eastern sector of Nepal
An inundation canal taking off at Chatra where the Kosi debouches into the plains has been built to
irrigate a gross area of 860 kmsup2 in Nepal The project has been renovated with IDA assistance after
Nepal took over the project in 1976
Silt deposition near Kosi embankment at Navbhata Saharsa Bihar India
Kosi embankment system
The Kosi barrage with earth dams across river afflux bunds and embankments above and below the
river confines the river to flow within embankments Embankments on both sides downstream of
the barrage with a length of 246 km (153 mi) has been constructed to check the westward
movement of the river The embankments have been kept wide apart about 12 to 16 km (99 mi) to
serve as a silt trap
Sapta Kosi High Multipurpose Project (Indo-Nepal)
Government of India (GOI) and His Majestys Government of Nepal (HMGN) have agreed to conduct
joint investigations and other studies for the preparation of Detailed Project Report (DPR) of Sapta
Kosi High Dam Multipurpose Project and Sun Kosi Storage-cum-Diversion Scheme to meet the
objectives of both the countries for Development of a) hydropower generation b) irrigation c) flood
controlmanagement and d) navigation
A 269-metre (880 ft) high concreteRock fill dam on the Sapta Koshi River with a dam toe
underground power house with an installed capacity of 3000 MW at 50 load factor a barrage on
river Sapta Kosi about 8 km (50 mi) downstream of Sapta Kosi High Dam to re-regulate the water
being released from the Sapta Koshi dam with two canals Eastern Chhatra Canal and Western
Chhatra Canal off-taking from the either bank from barrage site to provide water for irrigation both
in Nepal and India and Navigation through Koshi up to Kursela and also in the reservoir of Sapta
Koshi dam are envisaged
A Power Canal off-taking from the Eastern Chatra Canal is proposed for conveying the water
required for irrigation at existing Kosi barrage at Hanuman Nagar and also the water which may be
required downstream of Hanuman Nagar Barrage for the purpose of navigation To utilize the head
available between Chatra and Hanuman Nagar barrages for power generation three canal Power
Houses each of 100 MW installed capacity are also proposed on power canal
Necessary cushion in storage capacity of Sapta Kosi High Dam would be provided to moderate the
flood downstream of dam
Chatra Canal System would provide irrigation to large areas in Nepal and India (particularly in Bihar)
A Joint Project Office (JPO) has been set up in Nepal for investigation of the project
Hydropower
Nepal has a total estimated potential of 83290 MW out of which economically exploitable potential
is 42140 MW The Koshi river basin contributes 22350 MW of this potential(360 MW from small
schemes and 1875 MW from major schemes) and the economically exploitable potential is assessd
as 10860 MW (includes the Sapta Koshi Multipurpose Project [3300MW] mentioned above) Source [34]]
Damages to the canal ndash embankment ndash hydroelectrical projects are the possibilities if we create the
projects at places where we can expect high flow in short time of period It is better to target the
water at higher level before they unite and form big volume of water at one point
63 FampF ndash Irrigation projects along the river Godavari
[Godavari River Basin Irrigation Projects
Godavari River Delta
The Godavari River has its catchment area in five states of India Maharashtra Chattisgarh Madhya
Pradesh Andhra Pradesh Karnataka and Orissa
Dowleswaram Barrage
Jalaput
Balimela Reservoir
Upper Indravati
Nizam Sagar
Dams and bridges along the river
A barrage was built on the river at Dowleswaram was built by Sir Arthur Cotton in 1850 It was
rebuilt as a barrage and roadway during 1980s and named after him The roadway connects
Dowleswaram in East Godavari and Vijjeswaram in West Godavari
There is also a big dam built just after the source of the river at Trimbakeshwar The dam is in the
town of Gangapur which literally means a town on a river The dam provides drinking water to the
residents of Nashik and also supplies water to the thermal power station situated downstream at
Eklahara which provides power to the town
There is another multipurpose project on the Godavari River named Sri Ram Sagar Project in
Nizamabad District It is in the town of Pochampad 60km away from Nizamabad It irrigates 4
districts of Northern Telangana Region of Andhra Pradesh and supplies power
The Jayakwadi dam near Paithan is one of the largest earthen dam in India This dam was built to
address the problem of drought in Marathwada region and problem of flood along the bank of river
Two left and right canals provide the irrigation to fertile land up to Nanded district This dam has
major contribution in industrial development of Aurangabad
Source [34]]
All the dams which are at the level of 500mts AMSL will receive the water from FPC1 and thoses at
or below the level of 300mts AMSL will receive the water from FPC4
64 FampF ndash Narmada river water projects
[Narmada River
Narmada river development (NRD)
The Narmada river has a huge water resources potential as much as 3321 MAF (41000 Mcum) of
average annual flow (more than 90 of this flow occurring during the monsoon months of June ndash
September) which according to estimates is greater than the combined annual flows of the Ravi
Beas and the Sutlej rivers which feed the Indus basin The 75 dependable flow is 28 MAF (34537
MCM) Till the beginning of planned development in the country was started in 1946 this huge
potential went almost abegging without any effective utilization thus denying much needed succour
to the drought stricken people of the valley both in Madhya Pradesh and Gujarat Since then plans
have been evolved debated finally legally examined and adjudicated by a tribunal agitated by
NGOs The Supreme Court has finally intervened to ensure that the implementation of the projects is
not halted
Early background and dispute
Investigations for harnessing the Narmada waters started around the time of independence when
Central Waterways Irrigation and Navigation Commission) (CWINC) identified several storage
schemes and in 1948 the Khosla Committee prioritized the proposals and named Tawa Bargi
Punasa and Bharuch projects (the last three on the main stem of the river) for preparation of
reports The reports were ready by 1963 A parallel study of the Hydropower potential identified 16
sites with a potential of 1300 MW While the project in Gujarat called Baruch Weir project (for which
Jawaharlal Nehru laid the foundation stone in 1961) went through a series of modifications and
improvements with a reformed scheme at Navagam village to extend benefits up to the Rann of
Kutch but following the bifurcation of the erstwhile Bombay state into Maharashtra and Gujarat
states and Gujaratrsquos intent to raise the height of the dam at Navagam to maximize storage benefits
at the cost of submergence of potential hydropower sites in Maharashtra and Madhya Pradesh
created a dispute between the states This resulted in an impasse in the implementation o f the
agreed projects at Navagam in Gujarat Punasa in MP and Bargi dam in MP and power benefit
sharing among the states with MP refusing to ratify the agreements To break the logjam a high
level Committee was appointed by the Govt of India in Septembe r 1964 In 1965 the Committee
prepared a Master Plan for the basin which involved construction of 12 major projects in MP and the
Navagam dam in Gujarat It provided irrigation priority over power irrigation of 2630 kmsup2 in MP
400 kmsup2 in Maharashtra 1850 kmsup2 in Gujarat and 4000 kmsup2 in Rajasthan The storages it
recommended in MP involved Bargi Tawa and Narmadasagar (Punasa) while its proposed Navagam
high dam would submerge the hydelpower project sites of Jalasindhi (in Maharshtra) and Harinphal
(MP) but without any more submergence than would be caused by the three dams if separately
constructed Gujarat endorsed this proposal but Maharashtra was not willing to go by it After
intense parleys failed to resolve the problem GOI decided to set up the Narmada Water Disputes
Tribunal (NWDT) in 1969 under the Inter State Water Disputes Act 1956 to adjudicate on the
dispute relating to sharing of water of the inter-state river Narmada and its valley
Tribunal award After ten years of deliberations the Narmada Water Disputes Tribunal (NWDT) gave
its award in December 1979 The NWDT considering the development of the water resources of the
basin as a whole gave its award allocating share of water (after accepting the mutually agreed
settlement among the four party states in 1974 on sharing of the waters of Narmada on the basis
of a determination by the Tribunal of the height of the Navagam dam or the Sardar Sarovar dam)
and Hydro Power of the Sardar Sarovar Project
The Tribunalrsquos final order determined the utilizable quantum of Narmada waters to be 27 million
acre feet at 75 dependability and allocated it to the four states as in Table below including share
of power benefits It also stipulated the share of water when utilizable flow was in excess of 28
million acre feet The Navagam dam height was fixed at FRL 460 feet (140 m) with a maximum water
level of EL feet The Full Supply Level of the Navagam canal was fixed at 300 feet (91 m) The cost
sharing formula among the states and the consequent requirement of release of regulated releases
from the Narmada Sagar dam by MP was also spelt out The resettlement and rehabilitation package
was also clearly specified with all costs to be borne by Gujarat for all resettlement and rehabilitation
work of people affected in the three states and also for relocating any ancient or historic
monuments places of worship or idols likely to suffer submergence
Party state Alloted share of
water in million
acre feet (MAF)
share of
power
Madya Pradesh 1825 57
Gujarath 9 16
Maharastra 025 27
Rajastan 05 Nil
Total 28 100
The uniqueness of this Award is that a non riparian state ndash Rajasthan ndash has been allocated a share of
Narmada waters for meeting the water requirements of the drought prone districts of Barmer and
Jalore which have no other source of dependable water
Go ahead for the projects The work on the project did not start soon since extensive studies were
undertaken for project designing and with World Bank getting involved with funding studies and
project costs (Loan agreement with GOI of $450 million was signed in May 1985) the Resettlement
and Rehabilitation package was substantially revised over and above what was set in the NWDT
and environmental studies had to be undertaken But the environmental and forest cle arances for
the projects from the newly formed Ministry of Environment and Forests (MoEampF) involved
extensive inter-ministerial and inter departmental discussions (within the central govt and with state
govts) for a substantial period and it was only in June 1987 (almost 8 years after the NWDT award
was given in Dec 1979) that the MoEampF gave a conditional approval to the Sardar Sarovar and
Narmada Sagar Projects The Forest clearance was given in September 1987 for Sardar Sarovar only
The clearance also required the work to be done pari passu with the construction of the dams and
the filling of the reservoir In the mean time the Narmada Control Authority (NCA) an inter-State
Administrative Authority and the Sardar Sarovar Construction Advisory Committee (SSCAC) were set
up in 1980 by the Govt of India in compliance of the NWDT award the former organization was set
up in Dec 1980 as body corporate with representatives from the four party states and Govt of India
as a machinery to implement the decisions and directions of the NWDT and the later organization
was set up in Sept 1980 as a statutory body to ensure efficient economical and timely execution of
the Unit I (Dam amp appurtenant works) and Unit III (Hydropower works) of the Sardar Sarovar Project
(SSP) A Review Committee consisting of the Union Minister for Irrigation (now substituted by Union
Minister for Water Resources) as its Chairperson and the Chief Ministers of Madhya Pradesh
Maharashtra Gujarat and Rajasthan as its members is also in position to review the decisions of the
NCA and the SSCAC as required For monitoring and implementation of various environmental
activities effectively independent machinery of Environment Sub-Group is functioning since
Nov1987 under NCA Similarly for monitoring the progress of the resettlement and rehabilitation of
project affected people RampR subgroup is also functioning under the NCA At the state level Sardar
Sarovar Narmada Nigam Limited (SSNL) in Gujarat has the mandate to implement and manage the
Sardar Sarovar multipurpose project In Madhya Pradesh the Narmada Valley Development
Authority (NVDA) is vested the responsibility for implementation of the projects
Narmada River
Layout of Water Resources Development Projects in the Narmada Basin in Gujarat amp Madhya
Pradesh
Even though the tribunal award resolved the initial issue of water sharing however the height of
dam benefit sharing and the mode of settlement of project-affected people caused serious
difficulties in implementation particularly of the Sardar Sarovar dam (the terminal dam on the river)
Project-affected people agitated under the banner of the dedicated NGO - The Narmada Bachao
Andolan (NBA) The NBA followed up by Public Interest Litigation (PIL) in the Supreme Court The
NBA questioned the benefits claimed from the major projects challenged the resettlement and
rehabilitation packages for project affected people of the reservoir submergence and canal affected
zones and its implementation It also rejected the environmental impact assessments made and the
remedial actions taken by the project authorities This challenge created worldwide attention to the
major development activity planned in the valley It urged the World Bank to withdraw from the
project and the intense world wide pressure resulted in the Bank mounting an Independent Review
Mission (IRM) called the Morse Mission to review the SSP But the IRMrsquos report was neither
accepted by the Government of India or the World Bank Finally Government of India decided to
terminate further drawals from a remaining $180 million World Bank credit from the Bank with the
firm resolution that the project would be completed within the national resources
The Supreme Court has also deliberated on this issue for several years but finally upheld the Tribunal
Award and allowed the construction to proceed subject to conditions The Court introduced a
mechanism to monitor the progress of resettlement pari-passu with the raising of the height of the
dam through Grievance Redressal Authorities (GRA) in each of the party states The courtrsquos decision
referred in this document given in the year 2000 after 7 years of deliberations has paved the way
for completing the project to attain full envisaged benefits Some of the courtrsquos decisions are
essential to be quoted here (quoted in italics) to set at rest many of the distorted or incorrect
versions being presented in several of the linked Wikipedia articles on this subject
The overall plan for development ultimately conceived involves 30 major dams including Sardar
Sarovar (21 irrigation 5 hydropower and 4 multipurpose) some 135 medium dams and over three
minor dams in MP along the main stem of the river and its 41 tributaries to utilize its allocated share
of 1825 MAF before 2025 (within 45 years of the NWDT award) In addition to power generation
and irrigation within the basin water was allocated for domestic and industrial water uses and for
multipurpose trans-basin diversions to Son and Tons basins in eastern MP drought prone areas of
Saurashtra Kutch northern mainland in Gujarat and southern Rajasthan Irrigation benefits to the
extent of about 40000 to 50000 kmsup2 (of drought prone and scarcity areas) and power generation of
2600 MW were also envisaged Thus the Narmada river development is envisaged as a multi state
program for development of hydropower and irrigation dams and their associated irrigation
networks
Justice Bharucha stated that Considering the magnitude of rehabilitation involving a large
percentage of tribals loss of extensive forest area rich in biological diversity enormous
environmental cost of the project and considering the fact that the basic data on vital aspects are
still not available there could be but one conclusion that the project(s) are not ready for approval
Sardar Sarovar Project (SSP) at Navagam Subsequent to the Tribunal award and approval to the
project in 1987 by the Ministry of Water Resources with due clearances from the MoEampF
implementation of the SSP was taken up as the terminal project on the main stem of the Narmada
in Gujarat to utilize the share of allocated water to Gujarat and Rajasthan The concrete gravity dam
of 1210 m length and 163 m height above foundation with storage capacity of 77 million acre -feet
and reservoir length of 213 m extending into Gujarat Maharashtra and Madhya Pradesh is designed
to provide an annual irrigation of 18000 kmsup2 in Gujarat (covering 3360 villages of 62 talukas in 14
districts) 4260 kmsup2 in Rajasthan and hydel power generation of 1450 MW As a result of
construction of the dam over 48269 families (against 7000 families assessed in 1979 by the
Tribunal) will be affected as per the latest figures of NCA in the three States spread over 244
villages (4 fully and 240 partially - 39369 in MP in 192 villages 4163 in Maharshtra in 33 villages and
4737 in Gujarat in 19 villages) the total area affected being 37533 kmsup2 The submergence area is
broadly divided into two areas fully tribal area which covers the initial reach of about 100 or so
villages which are almost 100 tribal and hilly These include al l the 33 villages of Maharashtra (in
Nadurbar district) all 19 of Gujarat and many of the Madhya Pradesh The second part of the
submergence area is the mixed population area on the Nimad plains with a very well developed
economy that is well connected to the mainstream Considered as the largest water resources
project of India in terms of benefits some of the special features of the project are the following
Damrsquos spillway discharging capacity (307 million cusecs) is the 3rd highest in the world
With 1133 msup3s (40000 ftsup3s) capacity at the head regulator and 532 km length (458 km in
Gujarat and 74 km in Rajasthan) with 75000 km length of distribution system including field
channel the Narmada Main Canal is the largest irrigation canal in the world
The project aims at supplying 3571000 msup3day of drinking water (2900000 msup3day for domestic
consumption amp 671000 msup3day for industrial consumption) to 8215 villages amp 135 towns in Gujarat
which are presently suffering from acute shortage of water Also the project aims to provide
drinking water facilities to a population of about 1371000 in 1107 villages amp two towns in Jallore amp
Barmer districts of Rajasthan
Has the lowest ratio of submergence to area irrigated ndash being 165 of CCA against an average of
4 to 5 of other major irrigation projects
All the 6 units of River Bed Power House (RBPH) have been commissioned successfully by June 2006
and are in operation All the five units of Canal Head Power House (CHPH) have been commissioned
successfully by end of December 2004 and are in operation
The construction of the two multipurpose major projects - the Sardar Sarvoar in Gujarat and Indira
Sagar in Madya Pradesh - the two are interdependent to attain full envisaged benefits - is in progress
and substantial partial benefits have already been achieved Hence details of these two projects are
elaborated below
Sardar Sarovar Dam Gujarat partially completed (up to EL12192 m)
Largest lined canal in the World Sardar Sarovar Project
The dam has attained a height of EL12192 m ie the crest level of the spillway The gates are yet to
be erected to attain the FRL of EL 13868 m for which clearance is required from the Supreme Court
after the Grievance Redressal Committee submits its report on completion of R amp R up to that
elevation Top level of dam to be attained is EL 14650 m
The main irrigation canal has been substantially constructed for a length of 357 km Water has been
let into the canal for partial irrigation and water supply needs Further construction is in progress
Indira Sagar Project (ISP) in Madhya Pradesh at Punasa is one of the 30 major projects proposed in
the Narmada basin with the largest storage capacity in the country The project is located near
Punasa village in Khandwa District of Madhya Pradesh This Multipurpose River Valley Project
envisages construction of a concrete gravity dam 653 m long and 92 m high with gross storage
capacity of the reservoir of 1222 kmsup3 (99 MAF) and live storage of 975 kmsup3 (79MAF) to provide an
annual irrigation potential of 1690 kmsup2 and generation of 1000 MW of hydropower The project
shall also ensure supply of 006 MAF (74000000 msup3) of drinking water to rural areas in Khandwa
district In accordance with NWDT award an annual regulated flow of 812 MAF (10015 kmsup3) shall
be released to the Sardar Sarovar Project (SSP) ex-Maheshwar Project The operation of Indira Sagar
Project shall be carried out in such a way as to facilitate the regulation of Sardar Sarovar
Indira Sagar dam partially completed in Madhya Pradesh
Indira Sagar canal for irrigation
The dam and the powerhouse have been completed but storage has been restricted up to EL 260 m
under orders of the High Court Jabalpur from RampR consideration All the units of the powerhouse
have been commissioned and generation of power from the 8 units of 125 MW capacity each
commenced from Jan 2004[25]The irrigation component of the project is under a fairly advance
stage of implementation
Other completed and under construction projects Existing irrigation projects in the Narmada are the
1) Matiyari (1992) 2) Rani Avantibai Sagar (1988) 3) Barna (1978) 4) Tawa (1992-93) 5) Sukta
(1984) all in Madhya Pradesh and Karjan project in Gujarat
Projects under implementation are the 1) Bargi diversion 2) Kolar 3) Man 4) Omkareshwar
multipurpose (520 MW ndash commissioned in Nov 2007) and 5) Maheshwar (400 MW)
A large number of medium and small projects have been completed and many more are under
implementation as conceived under the overall Master Plan
Source [34]]
With the establishment of RCS all the dams and the hydroelectrical projects will get sufficient water
from the FPC1 and the West extension of FPC1 in this scenario if the levels of these projects are less
than 500 meters AMSL Problems like lsquohigh the magnitude of rehabilitation involving a large
percentage of tribals loss of extensive forest area rich in biological diversity enormous
environmental cost of the projectrsquo will not appear with RCS and all the states coming under this issue
like Madyapradesh Maharastra Gujarath and Rajastan will get more than sufficient water for
irrigation ndash industry ndash hydroelectrical projects ndash for domestic purposes
The cost will be less since (1) it involves only the creation of primary channel (2) there is no
necessity to construct the dams (3) there is no necessity to rehabilitate the people in a great way
since RCS involves very minimal area (4) no immersion of land like city and forest area in back water
in a bigger way (5) we may be creating U tubes in depressed lands in the course of primary channel
or the bi dam in a minimally depressed area but there is no back water issues in these and hence
land involved and rehabilitation are going to be less
All the water are used effectively and no water will enter the Arabian sea without being used
effectively over the land that is the more water generated beyond the storing capacity of the dam in
the rainy seasons will be effectively utilized all over the nation in the lands below 500 mts AMSL
65 FampF ndashWater dispute ndash Height of almatti dam
[Water disputes
Height of almatti dam
State gets a good deal Tribunal gives nod to raise Almatti dam height to 52425 meters
New Delhi In what could be a major relief to Karnataka the Krishna water disputes tribunal -2 has
allowed the state to build the Almatti dam up to the originally proposed height of 52425 meters
Major decisions Karnataka allowed to increase almatti dam height from 519 meters to 52425
meters Krishna waters decision Implementation Board to be set up will monitor flows Releases to
be monitored every 10 days Karnataka should release 8 to 10 tmc to AP in June and July Award to
come up for review in 2050
Water allocations Total water availability 2293tmc Andrapradesh 1001tmc Karnataka 911tmc
maharastra666tmc
This judgment has been given after 43 years of proceedings Source [37] ]
It is true by increasing the height of the dam from 519 to 52425 mts It is possible to store more
water that we can use it later
But what is the use if we are not getting sufficient water to fill the dam in one rain year As per the
calculation the total available water is 2293 TMC Andrapradesh is more benefitted from this
because there is more land available for agriculture and more population is going to be benefited If
the water generated is less then both the states are under loss The level of water (Height) in the
dam depends on the rain in the catchment area (Inflow) and the utilization in the process of
agriculture and others (out flow) If the inflow is steady throughout the year and the out flow is also
steady then both the states are going to be benefitted If we increase the height of the dam then we
may be storing more water but the back water may immerse more inhabited areas and it may
extend in the neighboring states like maharastra and other interstate issues and problems of
rehabilitation will arise
With RCS all such problems will be solved If we are creating the FPC1 at the level of 500mts AMSL
then the back water in the Almatti dam will raise only up to 500 (exactly 495) mts AMSL Any water
which is more than 500 mts AMSL will enter back in the FPC1 But the almatti dam will always be
able to relaease the water to both Karnataka and Andrapradesh what what ever amount they need
Here the total water availability 2293tmc and the allotted water to Andrapradesh 1001tmc and to
Karnataka is 911tmc Maharastra 666tmc With RCS the total water available becomes 10000 or
even more TMC and the states like Andrapradesh Karnataka and Maharastra can use 2000TMC or
even more if they want because the FPC1 will be continuously filled by the ri vers like Ganga ndash
Yamuna ndash Mahanadhi ndash Narnmada- Godhavari ndash Kaveri ndash and Krishna it iself
Thus we need not increase the height of the almatti dam lsquoin this instance onlyrsquo Increasing the height
of the dam may be the necessity in another instance that we need to discuss as such issues arises
Sources
[34] Britannica Concise Encyclopedia answerscom Wikipedia
[37] Deccan herald Mangalore Friday december31 2010 And Prajavani Kannada daily news paper
Mangalore Friday December 31 2010
Uttar Pradesh
Govind Ballabh Pant Sagar on Rihand River in Sonbhadra
Kalagarh Dam on Ramganga River in Kalagarh
Parichha Dam on Betwa River in Parichha (Jhansi District)
List of Dams in Lalitpur District Uttar Pradesh
o (A) Matatila Dam constructed during 1952-1964 on Betwa River in Lalitpur District Uttar Pradesh
Length 630 km Height 3353 Meters Area 20720 Sqkm Storage 113268 Mcm
o (B) Jamni Dam constructed during 1962-1973 on Jamni River in Lalitpur District Uttar Pradesh
Length 640 km Height 1918 Meters Area 414 Sqkm Storage 9289 Mcm
o (C) Rohini Dam constructed during 1976-1984 on Rohini River in Lalitpur District Uttar Pradesh
Length 165km Height 1550 Meters Area 44 Sqkm Storage 1212 Mcm
o (D) Shahzad Dam constructed during 1973-1992 on Shahzad River in Lalitpur District Uttar
Pradesh Length 416 km Height 1800 Meters Area 514 Sqkm Storage 13000 Mcm
o (E) Govind Sagar Dam constructed during 1947-1953 on Shahzad River in Lalitpur District Uttar
Pradesh Length 360 km Height 1829 Meters Area 368 Sqkm Storage 968 Mcm
o (F) Sajnam Dam constructed during 1977-1990 on Sajnam River in Lalitpur District Uttar Pradesh
Length 515 km Height 1878 Meters Area 290 Sqkm Storage 8350 Mcm
o (G) Sukma-Dukma Dam a below water construction on Betwa River near Jhansi District Uttar
Pradesh Length 215 km Height 2078 Meters
Uttarakhand
Tehri dam
Dhauli ganga dam
Sriram Sagar
Devadula Lift Irrigation Project
Kaddam
Manjira Reservoir
Lower Tirna
Purna
Upper PenGanga
Lower Dudhana
Jayakwadi Dam
Bhandara Reservoir
Mula Reservoir
Upper Pravara
Upper Indravati Project
Godavari Canal
Upper WainGanga
Majalgaon irrigation project is located in the Godavari river basin in the state of Maharashtra
West Bengal
Panchet Dam
Dam projects
Narmada Dam Project
Banasura Sagar Dam - Banasurasagar Project
Noyyal River - Tanks System
Farakka Barrage
Source [34] ]
All the dams and the areas which are below the level of 500mts AMSL except in the states of Jammu
and Kashmir Northestern states will get the water form RCS and the principle feeders will be the
Ganga and the Yamuna
All the dams and the areas which are below the level of 300mts AMSL except in the states of Jammu
and Kashmir Northestern states will get the water form RCS and the principle feeders will be the
Brahamaputra for the RCS
All the dams and the areas which are below the level of 900mts AMSL in south deccan platue
especially the southern districts of Karnataka western districts of Andra Pradesh and Tamilnadu will
get the water from the RCS and the principle feeders will be the River Kavery
All the dams and the areas which are below the level of 800mts AMSL in north India like states of
Punjab Haryana Himachal Pradesh Delhi northern district of Uttarpradesh Bihar which are north
to the course of Ganga and Yamuna will get the water from the RCS and the principle feeders will be
the Ganaga and Yamuna Rivers
62 FampF ndash Projects across River kosi [Kosi River
Development scenario
Multipurpose projects
After India attained independence in August 1947 the development scenario in India has been
resolute on technological development In keeping with this approach the National Flood Control
Policy in 1954 (following the disastrous floods of 1954 in a large part of the Koshi river basin) stated
that floods could be controlled through a series of flood protection works like dams embankments
and river training works One such work which drew the immediate attention of the policy planners
after independence was a solution to the recurring flood menace faced by people of North Bihar due
to the Kosi and other rivers flowing from Nepal to India The Kosi project was thus conceptualized
(based on investigations between 1946 to 1955) in three continuous interlinked stages ndash the first
was a barrage to anchor this wayward river that had migrated about 120 km (75 mi) westward in the
last 250 years laying waste to a huge tract in north Bihar and to provide irrigation and power
benefits to Nepal and India The second part was to build embankments both below and above the
barrage so as to jacket the river within the defined channel The third part envisaged a high
multipurpose dam within Nepal at Barakshetra to provide substantial flood cushion along with large
irrigation and power benefits to both countries This was followed up by signing of the Kosi
Agreement between Nepal and India on 25 April 1954 and which was revised on 19 December 1966
to address the concerns of Nepal Further letters of Exchange to the Agreement between the two
countries provided for additional schemes for providing benefits of irri gation While the first two
parts of the concept plan have been implemented at the cost of the Government of India the third
part namely the Koshi High dam the kingpin of the whole concept for various political reasons
precluded any action for several years but has since been revived under a fresh agreement in a
modified form for further investigations and studies
Details of the above projects are elaborated below
Kosi barrage and irrigation
Kosi Barrage also called Bhimnagar Barrage after the name of the place where it was built between
the years 1959 and 1963 straddles the Indo-Nepal border It is an irrigation flood control and
hydropower generation project on the Kosi river built under a bilateral agreement between Nepal
and India the entire cost of the project was borne by India The catchment area of the river is
61788 km2 (23856 sq mi) in Nepal at the Barrage site The highest peaks ndash the Mount Everest and
the Mount Kanchenjunga mdash lie in its catchment About 10 of this catchment is snow-fed The
Eastern Canal and the Western Canal taking off from the barrage have been designed for a discharge
capacity of 455 cubic metres per second (16100 cu fts) to irrigate 6125 square kilometres
(1514000 acres) and 210 cubic metres per second (7400 cu fts) to irrigate 35661 square
kilometres (881200 acres) respectively A hydropower plant has been built on the Eastern Canal at
a canal drop (36 km (22 mi) from the Koshi Barrage) to generate 20 MW The Western Kosi Canal
provides irrigation to 250 square kilometres (62000 acres) in Nepal A valuable bridge over the
barrage opened up the East-West highway in the eastern sector of Nepal
An inundation canal taking off at Chatra where the Kosi debouches into the plains has been built to
irrigate a gross area of 860 kmsup2 in Nepal The project has been renovated with IDA assistance after
Nepal took over the project in 1976
Silt deposition near Kosi embankment at Navbhata Saharsa Bihar India
Kosi embankment system
The Kosi barrage with earth dams across river afflux bunds and embankments above and below the
river confines the river to flow within embankments Embankments on both sides downstream of
the barrage with a length of 246 km (153 mi) has been constructed to check the westward
movement of the river The embankments have been kept wide apart about 12 to 16 km (99 mi) to
serve as a silt trap
Sapta Kosi High Multipurpose Project (Indo-Nepal)
Government of India (GOI) and His Majestys Government of Nepal (HMGN) have agreed to conduct
joint investigations and other studies for the preparation of Detailed Project Report (DPR) of Sapta
Kosi High Dam Multipurpose Project and Sun Kosi Storage-cum-Diversion Scheme to meet the
objectives of both the countries for Development of a) hydropower generation b) irrigation c) flood
controlmanagement and d) navigation
A 269-metre (880 ft) high concreteRock fill dam on the Sapta Koshi River with a dam toe
underground power house with an installed capacity of 3000 MW at 50 load factor a barrage on
river Sapta Kosi about 8 km (50 mi) downstream of Sapta Kosi High Dam to re-regulate the water
being released from the Sapta Koshi dam with two canals Eastern Chhatra Canal and Western
Chhatra Canal off-taking from the either bank from barrage site to provide water for irrigation both
in Nepal and India and Navigation through Koshi up to Kursela and also in the reservoir of Sapta
Koshi dam are envisaged
A Power Canal off-taking from the Eastern Chatra Canal is proposed for conveying the water
required for irrigation at existing Kosi barrage at Hanuman Nagar and also the water which may be
required downstream of Hanuman Nagar Barrage for the purpose of navigation To utilize the head
available between Chatra and Hanuman Nagar barrages for power generation three canal Power
Houses each of 100 MW installed capacity are also proposed on power canal
Necessary cushion in storage capacity of Sapta Kosi High Dam would be provided to moderate the
flood downstream of dam
Chatra Canal System would provide irrigation to large areas in Nepal and India (particularly in Bihar)
A Joint Project Office (JPO) has been set up in Nepal for investigation of the project
Hydropower
Nepal has a total estimated potential of 83290 MW out of which economically exploitable potential
is 42140 MW The Koshi river basin contributes 22350 MW of this potential(360 MW from small
schemes and 1875 MW from major schemes) and the economically exploitable potential is assessd
as 10860 MW (includes the Sapta Koshi Multipurpose Project [3300MW] mentioned above) Source [34]]
Damages to the canal ndash embankment ndash hydroelectrical projects are the possibilities if we create the
projects at places where we can expect high flow in short time of period It is better to target the
water at higher level before they unite and form big volume of water at one point
63 FampF ndash Irrigation projects along the river Godavari
[Godavari River Basin Irrigation Projects
Godavari River Delta
The Godavari River has its catchment area in five states of India Maharashtra Chattisgarh Madhya
Pradesh Andhra Pradesh Karnataka and Orissa
Dowleswaram Barrage
Jalaput
Balimela Reservoir
Upper Indravati
Nizam Sagar
Dams and bridges along the river
A barrage was built on the river at Dowleswaram was built by Sir Arthur Cotton in 1850 It was
rebuilt as a barrage and roadway during 1980s and named after him The roadway connects
Dowleswaram in East Godavari and Vijjeswaram in West Godavari
There is also a big dam built just after the source of the river at Trimbakeshwar The dam is in the
town of Gangapur which literally means a town on a river The dam provides drinking water to the
residents of Nashik and also supplies water to the thermal power station situated downstream at
Eklahara which provides power to the town
There is another multipurpose project on the Godavari River named Sri Ram Sagar Project in
Nizamabad District It is in the town of Pochampad 60km away from Nizamabad It irrigates 4
districts of Northern Telangana Region of Andhra Pradesh and supplies power
The Jayakwadi dam near Paithan is one of the largest earthen dam in India This dam was built to
address the problem of drought in Marathwada region and problem of flood along the bank of river
Two left and right canals provide the irrigation to fertile land up to Nanded district This dam has
major contribution in industrial development of Aurangabad
Source [34]]
All the dams which are at the level of 500mts AMSL will receive the water from FPC1 and thoses at
or below the level of 300mts AMSL will receive the water from FPC4
64 FampF ndash Narmada river water projects
[Narmada River
Narmada river development (NRD)
The Narmada river has a huge water resources potential as much as 3321 MAF (41000 Mcum) of
average annual flow (more than 90 of this flow occurring during the monsoon months of June ndash
September) which according to estimates is greater than the combined annual flows of the Ravi
Beas and the Sutlej rivers which feed the Indus basin The 75 dependable flow is 28 MAF (34537
MCM) Till the beginning of planned development in the country was started in 1946 this huge
potential went almost abegging without any effective utilization thus denying much needed succour
to the drought stricken people of the valley both in Madhya Pradesh and Gujarat Since then plans
have been evolved debated finally legally examined and adjudicated by a tribunal agitated by
NGOs The Supreme Court has finally intervened to ensure that the implementation of the projects is
not halted
Early background and dispute
Investigations for harnessing the Narmada waters started around the time of independence when
Central Waterways Irrigation and Navigation Commission) (CWINC) identified several storage
schemes and in 1948 the Khosla Committee prioritized the proposals and named Tawa Bargi
Punasa and Bharuch projects (the last three on the main stem of the river) for preparation of
reports The reports were ready by 1963 A parallel study of the Hydropower potential identified 16
sites with a potential of 1300 MW While the project in Gujarat called Baruch Weir project (for which
Jawaharlal Nehru laid the foundation stone in 1961) went through a series of modifications and
improvements with a reformed scheme at Navagam village to extend benefits up to the Rann of
Kutch but following the bifurcation of the erstwhile Bombay state into Maharashtra and Gujarat
states and Gujaratrsquos intent to raise the height of the dam at Navagam to maximize storage benefits
at the cost of submergence of potential hydropower sites in Maharashtra and Madhya Pradesh
created a dispute between the states This resulted in an impasse in the implementation o f the
agreed projects at Navagam in Gujarat Punasa in MP and Bargi dam in MP and power benefit
sharing among the states with MP refusing to ratify the agreements To break the logjam a high
level Committee was appointed by the Govt of India in Septembe r 1964 In 1965 the Committee
prepared a Master Plan for the basin which involved construction of 12 major projects in MP and the
Navagam dam in Gujarat It provided irrigation priority over power irrigation of 2630 kmsup2 in MP
400 kmsup2 in Maharashtra 1850 kmsup2 in Gujarat and 4000 kmsup2 in Rajasthan The storages it
recommended in MP involved Bargi Tawa and Narmadasagar (Punasa) while its proposed Navagam
high dam would submerge the hydelpower project sites of Jalasindhi (in Maharshtra) and Harinphal
(MP) but without any more submergence than would be caused by the three dams if separately
constructed Gujarat endorsed this proposal but Maharashtra was not willing to go by it After
intense parleys failed to resolve the problem GOI decided to set up the Narmada Water Disputes
Tribunal (NWDT) in 1969 under the Inter State Water Disputes Act 1956 to adjudicate on the
dispute relating to sharing of water of the inter-state river Narmada and its valley
Tribunal award After ten years of deliberations the Narmada Water Disputes Tribunal (NWDT) gave
its award in December 1979 The NWDT considering the development of the water resources of the
basin as a whole gave its award allocating share of water (after accepting the mutually agreed
settlement among the four party states in 1974 on sharing of the waters of Narmada on the basis
of a determination by the Tribunal of the height of the Navagam dam or the Sardar Sarovar dam)
and Hydro Power of the Sardar Sarovar Project
The Tribunalrsquos final order determined the utilizable quantum of Narmada waters to be 27 million
acre feet at 75 dependability and allocated it to the four states as in Table below including share
of power benefits It also stipulated the share of water when utilizable flow was in excess of 28
million acre feet The Navagam dam height was fixed at FRL 460 feet (140 m) with a maximum water
level of EL feet The Full Supply Level of the Navagam canal was fixed at 300 feet (91 m) The cost
sharing formula among the states and the consequent requirement of release of regulated releases
from the Narmada Sagar dam by MP was also spelt out The resettlement and rehabilitation package
was also clearly specified with all costs to be borne by Gujarat for all resettlement and rehabilitation
work of people affected in the three states and also for relocating any ancient or historic
monuments places of worship or idols likely to suffer submergence
Party state Alloted share of
water in million
acre feet (MAF)
share of
power
Madya Pradesh 1825 57
Gujarath 9 16
Maharastra 025 27
Rajastan 05 Nil
Total 28 100
The uniqueness of this Award is that a non riparian state ndash Rajasthan ndash has been allocated a share of
Narmada waters for meeting the water requirements of the drought prone districts of Barmer and
Jalore which have no other source of dependable water
Go ahead for the projects The work on the project did not start soon since extensive studies were
undertaken for project designing and with World Bank getting involved with funding studies and
project costs (Loan agreement with GOI of $450 million was signed in May 1985) the Resettlement
and Rehabilitation package was substantially revised over and above what was set in the NWDT
and environmental studies had to be undertaken But the environmental and forest cle arances for
the projects from the newly formed Ministry of Environment and Forests (MoEampF) involved
extensive inter-ministerial and inter departmental discussions (within the central govt and with state
govts) for a substantial period and it was only in June 1987 (almost 8 years after the NWDT award
was given in Dec 1979) that the MoEampF gave a conditional approval to the Sardar Sarovar and
Narmada Sagar Projects The Forest clearance was given in September 1987 for Sardar Sarovar only
The clearance also required the work to be done pari passu with the construction of the dams and
the filling of the reservoir In the mean time the Narmada Control Authority (NCA) an inter-State
Administrative Authority and the Sardar Sarovar Construction Advisory Committee (SSCAC) were set
up in 1980 by the Govt of India in compliance of the NWDT award the former organization was set
up in Dec 1980 as body corporate with representatives from the four party states and Govt of India
as a machinery to implement the decisions and directions of the NWDT and the later organization
was set up in Sept 1980 as a statutory body to ensure efficient economical and timely execution of
the Unit I (Dam amp appurtenant works) and Unit III (Hydropower works) of the Sardar Sarovar Project
(SSP) A Review Committee consisting of the Union Minister for Irrigation (now substituted by Union
Minister for Water Resources) as its Chairperson and the Chief Ministers of Madhya Pradesh
Maharashtra Gujarat and Rajasthan as its members is also in position to review the decisions of the
NCA and the SSCAC as required For monitoring and implementation of various environmental
activities effectively independent machinery of Environment Sub-Group is functioning since
Nov1987 under NCA Similarly for monitoring the progress of the resettlement and rehabilitation of
project affected people RampR subgroup is also functioning under the NCA At the state level Sardar
Sarovar Narmada Nigam Limited (SSNL) in Gujarat has the mandate to implement and manage the
Sardar Sarovar multipurpose project In Madhya Pradesh the Narmada Valley Development
Authority (NVDA) is vested the responsibility for implementation of the projects
Narmada River
Layout of Water Resources Development Projects in the Narmada Basin in Gujarat amp Madhya
Pradesh
Even though the tribunal award resolved the initial issue of water sharing however the height of
dam benefit sharing and the mode of settlement of project-affected people caused serious
difficulties in implementation particularly of the Sardar Sarovar dam (the terminal dam on the river)
Project-affected people agitated under the banner of the dedicated NGO - The Narmada Bachao
Andolan (NBA) The NBA followed up by Public Interest Litigation (PIL) in the Supreme Court The
NBA questioned the benefits claimed from the major projects challenged the resettlement and
rehabilitation packages for project affected people of the reservoir submergence and canal affected
zones and its implementation It also rejected the environmental impact assessments made and the
remedial actions taken by the project authorities This challenge created worldwide attention to the
major development activity planned in the valley It urged the World Bank to withdraw from the
project and the intense world wide pressure resulted in the Bank mounting an Independent Review
Mission (IRM) called the Morse Mission to review the SSP But the IRMrsquos report was neither
accepted by the Government of India or the World Bank Finally Government of India decided to
terminate further drawals from a remaining $180 million World Bank credit from the Bank with the
firm resolution that the project would be completed within the national resources
The Supreme Court has also deliberated on this issue for several years but finally upheld the Tribunal
Award and allowed the construction to proceed subject to conditions The Court introduced a
mechanism to monitor the progress of resettlement pari-passu with the raising of the height of the
dam through Grievance Redressal Authorities (GRA) in each of the party states The courtrsquos decision
referred in this document given in the year 2000 after 7 years of deliberations has paved the way
for completing the project to attain full envisaged benefits Some of the courtrsquos decisions are
essential to be quoted here (quoted in italics) to set at rest many of the distorted or incorrect
versions being presented in several of the linked Wikipedia articles on this subject
The overall plan for development ultimately conceived involves 30 major dams including Sardar
Sarovar (21 irrigation 5 hydropower and 4 multipurpose) some 135 medium dams and over three
minor dams in MP along the main stem of the river and its 41 tributaries to utilize its allocated share
of 1825 MAF before 2025 (within 45 years of the NWDT award) In addition to power generation
and irrigation within the basin water was allocated for domestic and industrial water uses and for
multipurpose trans-basin diversions to Son and Tons basins in eastern MP drought prone areas of
Saurashtra Kutch northern mainland in Gujarat and southern Rajasthan Irrigation benefits to the
extent of about 40000 to 50000 kmsup2 (of drought prone and scarcity areas) and power generation of
2600 MW were also envisaged Thus the Narmada river development is envisaged as a multi state
program for development of hydropower and irrigation dams and their associated irrigation
networks
Justice Bharucha stated that Considering the magnitude of rehabilitation involving a large
percentage of tribals loss of extensive forest area rich in biological diversity enormous
environmental cost of the project and considering the fact that the basic data on vital aspects are
still not available there could be but one conclusion that the project(s) are not ready for approval
Sardar Sarovar Project (SSP) at Navagam Subsequent to the Tribunal award and approval to the
project in 1987 by the Ministry of Water Resources with due clearances from the MoEampF
implementation of the SSP was taken up as the terminal project on the main stem of the Narmada
in Gujarat to utilize the share of allocated water to Gujarat and Rajasthan The concrete gravity dam
of 1210 m length and 163 m height above foundation with storage capacity of 77 million acre -feet
and reservoir length of 213 m extending into Gujarat Maharashtra and Madhya Pradesh is designed
to provide an annual irrigation of 18000 kmsup2 in Gujarat (covering 3360 villages of 62 talukas in 14
districts) 4260 kmsup2 in Rajasthan and hydel power generation of 1450 MW As a result of
construction of the dam over 48269 families (against 7000 families assessed in 1979 by the
Tribunal) will be affected as per the latest figures of NCA in the three States spread over 244
villages (4 fully and 240 partially - 39369 in MP in 192 villages 4163 in Maharshtra in 33 villages and
4737 in Gujarat in 19 villages) the total area affected being 37533 kmsup2 The submergence area is
broadly divided into two areas fully tribal area which covers the initial reach of about 100 or so
villages which are almost 100 tribal and hilly These include al l the 33 villages of Maharashtra (in
Nadurbar district) all 19 of Gujarat and many of the Madhya Pradesh The second part of the
submergence area is the mixed population area on the Nimad plains with a very well developed
economy that is well connected to the mainstream Considered as the largest water resources
project of India in terms of benefits some of the special features of the project are the following
Damrsquos spillway discharging capacity (307 million cusecs) is the 3rd highest in the world
With 1133 msup3s (40000 ftsup3s) capacity at the head regulator and 532 km length (458 km in
Gujarat and 74 km in Rajasthan) with 75000 km length of distribution system including field
channel the Narmada Main Canal is the largest irrigation canal in the world
The project aims at supplying 3571000 msup3day of drinking water (2900000 msup3day for domestic
consumption amp 671000 msup3day for industrial consumption) to 8215 villages amp 135 towns in Gujarat
which are presently suffering from acute shortage of water Also the project aims to provide
drinking water facilities to a population of about 1371000 in 1107 villages amp two towns in Jallore amp
Barmer districts of Rajasthan
Has the lowest ratio of submergence to area irrigated ndash being 165 of CCA against an average of
4 to 5 of other major irrigation projects
All the 6 units of River Bed Power House (RBPH) have been commissioned successfully by June 2006
and are in operation All the five units of Canal Head Power House (CHPH) have been commissioned
successfully by end of December 2004 and are in operation
The construction of the two multipurpose major projects - the Sardar Sarvoar in Gujarat and Indira
Sagar in Madya Pradesh - the two are interdependent to attain full envisaged benefits - is in progress
and substantial partial benefits have already been achieved Hence details of these two projects are
elaborated below
Sardar Sarovar Dam Gujarat partially completed (up to EL12192 m)
Largest lined canal in the World Sardar Sarovar Project
The dam has attained a height of EL12192 m ie the crest level of the spillway The gates are yet to
be erected to attain the FRL of EL 13868 m for which clearance is required from the Supreme Court
after the Grievance Redressal Committee submits its report on completion of R amp R up to that
elevation Top level of dam to be attained is EL 14650 m
The main irrigation canal has been substantially constructed for a length of 357 km Water has been
let into the canal for partial irrigation and water supply needs Further construction is in progress
Indira Sagar Project (ISP) in Madhya Pradesh at Punasa is one of the 30 major projects proposed in
the Narmada basin with the largest storage capacity in the country The project is located near
Punasa village in Khandwa District of Madhya Pradesh This Multipurpose River Valley Project
envisages construction of a concrete gravity dam 653 m long and 92 m high with gross storage
capacity of the reservoir of 1222 kmsup3 (99 MAF) and live storage of 975 kmsup3 (79MAF) to provide an
annual irrigation potential of 1690 kmsup2 and generation of 1000 MW of hydropower The project
shall also ensure supply of 006 MAF (74000000 msup3) of drinking water to rural areas in Khandwa
district In accordance with NWDT award an annual regulated flow of 812 MAF (10015 kmsup3) shall
be released to the Sardar Sarovar Project (SSP) ex-Maheshwar Project The operation of Indira Sagar
Project shall be carried out in such a way as to facilitate the regulation of Sardar Sarovar
Indira Sagar dam partially completed in Madhya Pradesh
Indira Sagar canal for irrigation
The dam and the powerhouse have been completed but storage has been restricted up to EL 260 m
under orders of the High Court Jabalpur from RampR consideration All the units of the powerhouse
have been commissioned and generation of power from the 8 units of 125 MW capacity each
commenced from Jan 2004[25]The irrigation component of the project is under a fairly advance
stage of implementation
Other completed and under construction projects Existing irrigation projects in the Narmada are the
1) Matiyari (1992) 2) Rani Avantibai Sagar (1988) 3) Barna (1978) 4) Tawa (1992-93) 5) Sukta
(1984) all in Madhya Pradesh and Karjan project in Gujarat
Projects under implementation are the 1) Bargi diversion 2) Kolar 3) Man 4) Omkareshwar
multipurpose (520 MW ndash commissioned in Nov 2007) and 5) Maheshwar (400 MW)
A large number of medium and small projects have been completed and many more are under
implementation as conceived under the overall Master Plan
Source [34]]
With the establishment of RCS all the dams and the hydroelectrical projects will get sufficient water
from the FPC1 and the West extension of FPC1 in this scenario if the levels of these projects are less
than 500 meters AMSL Problems like lsquohigh the magnitude of rehabilitation involving a large
percentage of tribals loss of extensive forest area rich in biological diversity enormous
environmental cost of the projectrsquo will not appear with RCS and all the states coming under this issue
like Madyapradesh Maharastra Gujarath and Rajastan will get more than sufficient water for
irrigation ndash industry ndash hydroelectrical projects ndash for domestic purposes
The cost will be less since (1) it involves only the creation of primary channel (2) there is no
necessity to construct the dams (3) there is no necessity to rehabilitate the people in a great way
since RCS involves very minimal area (4) no immersion of land like city and forest area in back water
in a bigger way (5) we may be creating U tubes in depressed lands in the course of primary channel
or the bi dam in a minimally depressed area but there is no back water issues in these and hence
land involved and rehabilitation are going to be less
All the water are used effectively and no water will enter the Arabian sea without being used
effectively over the land that is the more water generated beyond the storing capacity of the dam in
the rainy seasons will be effectively utilized all over the nation in the lands below 500 mts AMSL
65 FampF ndashWater dispute ndash Height of almatti dam
[Water disputes
Height of almatti dam
State gets a good deal Tribunal gives nod to raise Almatti dam height to 52425 meters
New Delhi In what could be a major relief to Karnataka the Krishna water disputes tribunal -2 has
allowed the state to build the Almatti dam up to the originally proposed height of 52425 meters
Major decisions Karnataka allowed to increase almatti dam height from 519 meters to 52425
meters Krishna waters decision Implementation Board to be set up will monitor flows Releases to
be monitored every 10 days Karnataka should release 8 to 10 tmc to AP in June and July Award to
come up for review in 2050
Water allocations Total water availability 2293tmc Andrapradesh 1001tmc Karnataka 911tmc
maharastra666tmc
This judgment has been given after 43 years of proceedings Source [37] ]
It is true by increasing the height of the dam from 519 to 52425 mts It is possible to store more
water that we can use it later
But what is the use if we are not getting sufficient water to fill the dam in one rain year As per the
calculation the total available water is 2293 TMC Andrapradesh is more benefitted from this
because there is more land available for agriculture and more population is going to be benefited If
the water generated is less then both the states are under loss The level of water (Height) in the
dam depends on the rain in the catchment area (Inflow) and the utilization in the process of
agriculture and others (out flow) If the inflow is steady throughout the year and the out flow is also
steady then both the states are going to be benefitted If we increase the height of the dam then we
may be storing more water but the back water may immerse more inhabited areas and it may
extend in the neighboring states like maharastra and other interstate issues and problems of
rehabilitation will arise
With RCS all such problems will be solved If we are creating the FPC1 at the level of 500mts AMSL
then the back water in the Almatti dam will raise only up to 500 (exactly 495) mts AMSL Any water
which is more than 500 mts AMSL will enter back in the FPC1 But the almatti dam will always be
able to relaease the water to both Karnataka and Andrapradesh what what ever amount they need
Here the total water availability 2293tmc and the allotted water to Andrapradesh 1001tmc and to
Karnataka is 911tmc Maharastra 666tmc With RCS the total water available becomes 10000 or
even more TMC and the states like Andrapradesh Karnataka and Maharastra can use 2000TMC or
even more if they want because the FPC1 will be continuously filled by the ri vers like Ganga ndash
Yamuna ndash Mahanadhi ndash Narnmada- Godhavari ndash Kaveri ndash and Krishna it iself
Thus we need not increase the height of the almatti dam lsquoin this instance onlyrsquo Increasing the height
of the dam may be the necessity in another instance that we need to discuss as such issues arises
Sources
[34] Britannica Concise Encyclopedia answerscom Wikipedia
[37] Deccan herald Mangalore Friday december31 2010 And Prajavani Kannada daily news paper
Mangalore Friday December 31 2010
West Bengal
Panchet Dam
Dam projects
Narmada Dam Project
Banasura Sagar Dam - Banasurasagar Project
Noyyal River - Tanks System
Farakka Barrage
Source [34] ]
All the dams and the areas which are below the level of 500mts AMSL except in the states of Jammu
and Kashmir Northestern states will get the water form RCS and the principle feeders will be the
Ganga and the Yamuna
All the dams and the areas which are below the level of 300mts AMSL except in the states of Jammu
and Kashmir Northestern states will get the water form RCS and the principle feeders will be the
Brahamaputra for the RCS
All the dams and the areas which are below the level of 900mts AMSL in south deccan platue
especially the southern districts of Karnataka western districts of Andra Pradesh and Tamilnadu will
get the water from the RCS and the principle feeders will be the River Kavery
All the dams and the areas which are below the level of 800mts AMSL in north India like states of
Punjab Haryana Himachal Pradesh Delhi northern district of Uttarpradesh Bihar which are north
to the course of Ganga and Yamuna will get the water from the RCS and the principle feeders will be
the Ganaga and Yamuna Rivers
62 FampF ndash Projects across River kosi [Kosi River
Development scenario
Multipurpose projects
After India attained independence in August 1947 the development scenario in India has been
resolute on technological development In keeping with this approach the National Flood Control
Policy in 1954 (following the disastrous floods of 1954 in a large part of the Koshi river basin) stated
that floods could be controlled through a series of flood protection works like dams embankments
and river training works One such work which drew the immediate attention of the policy planners
after independence was a solution to the recurring flood menace faced by people of North Bihar due
to the Kosi and other rivers flowing from Nepal to India The Kosi project was thus conceptualized
(based on investigations between 1946 to 1955) in three continuous interlinked stages ndash the first
was a barrage to anchor this wayward river that had migrated about 120 km (75 mi) westward in the
last 250 years laying waste to a huge tract in north Bihar and to provide irrigation and power
benefits to Nepal and India The second part was to build embankments both below and above the
barrage so as to jacket the river within the defined channel The third part envisaged a high
multipurpose dam within Nepal at Barakshetra to provide substantial flood cushion along with large
irrigation and power benefits to both countries This was followed up by signing of the Kosi
Agreement between Nepal and India on 25 April 1954 and which was revised on 19 December 1966
to address the concerns of Nepal Further letters of Exchange to the Agreement between the two
countries provided for additional schemes for providing benefits of irri gation While the first two
parts of the concept plan have been implemented at the cost of the Government of India the third
part namely the Koshi High dam the kingpin of the whole concept for various political reasons
precluded any action for several years but has since been revived under a fresh agreement in a
modified form for further investigations and studies
Details of the above projects are elaborated below
Kosi barrage and irrigation
Kosi Barrage also called Bhimnagar Barrage after the name of the place where it was built between
the years 1959 and 1963 straddles the Indo-Nepal border It is an irrigation flood control and
hydropower generation project on the Kosi river built under a bilateral agreement between Nepal
and India the entire cost of the project was borne by India The catchment area of the river is
61788 km2 (23856 sq mi) in Nepal at the Barrage site The highest peaks ndash the Mount Everest and
the Mount Kanchenjunga mdash lie in its catchment About 10 of this catchment is snow-fed The
Eastern Canal and the Western Canal taking off from the barrage have been designed for a discharge
capacity of 455 cubic metres per second (16100 cu fts) to irrigate 6125 square kilometres
(1514000 acres) and 210 cubic metres per second (7400 cu fts) to irrigate 35661 square
kilometres (881200 acres) respectively A hydropower plant has been built on the Eastern Canal at
a canal drop (36 km (22 mi) from the Koshi Barrage) to generate 20 MW The Western Kosi Canal
provides irrigation to 250 square kilometres (62000 acres) in Nepal A valuable bridge over the
barrage opened up the East-West highway in the eastern sector of Nepal
An inundation canal taking off at Chatra where the Kosi debouches into the plains has been built to
irrigate a gross area of 860 kmsup2 in Nepal The project has been renovated with IDA assistance after
Nepal took over the project in 1976
Silt deposition near Kosi embankment at Navbhata Saharsa Bihar India
Kosi embankment system
The Kosi barrage with earth dams across river afflux bunds and embankments above and below the
river confines the river to flow within embankments Embankments on both sides downstream of
the barrage with a length of 246 km (153 mi) has been constructed to check the westward
movement of the river The embankments have been kept wide apart about 12 to 16 km (99 mi) to
serve as a silt trap
Sapta Kosi High Multipurpose Project (Indo-Nepal)
Government of India (GOI) and His Majestys Government of Nepal (HMGN) have agreed to conduct
joint investigations and other studies for the preparation of Detailed Project Report (DPR) of Sapta
Kosi High Dam Multipurpose Project and Sun Kosi Storage-cum-Diversion Scheme to meet the
objectives of both the countries for Development of a) hydropower generation b) irrigation c) flood
controlmanagement and d) navigation
A 269-metre (880 ft) high concreteRock fill dam on the Sapta Koshi River with a dam toe
underground power house with an installed capacity of 3000 MW at 50 load factor a barrage on
river Sapta Kosi about 8 km (50 mi) downstream of Sapta Kosi High Dam to re-regulate the water
being released from the Sapta Koshi dam with two canals Eastern Chhatra Canal and Western
Chhatra Canal off-taking from the either bank from barrage site to provide water for irrigation both
in Nepal and India and Navigation through Koshi up to Kursela and also in the reservoir of Sapta
Koshi dam are envisaged
A Power Canal off-taking from the Eastern Chatra Canal is proposed for conveying the water
required for irrigation at existing Kosi barrage at Hanuman Nagar and also the water which may be
required downstream of Hanuman Nagar Barrage for the purpose of navigation To utilize the head
available between Chatra and Hanuman Nagar barrages for power generation three canal Power
Houses each of 100 MW installed capacity are also proposed on power canal
Necessary cushion in storage capacity of Sapta Kosi High Dam would be provided to moderate the
flood downstream of dam
Chatra Canal System would provide irrigation to large areas in Nepal and India (particularly in Bihar)
A Joint Project Office (JPO) has been set up in Nepal for investigation of the project
Hydropower
Nepal has a total estimated potential of 83290 MW out of which economically exploitable potential
is 42140 MW The Koshi river basin contributes 22350 MW of this potential(360 MW from small
schemes and 1875 MW from major schemes) and the economically exploitable potential is assessd
as 10860 MW (includes the Sapta Koshi Multipurpose Project [3300MW] mentioned above) Source [34]]
Damages to the canal ndash embankment ndash hydroelectrical projects are the possibilities if we create the
projects at places where we can expect high flow in short time of period It is better to target the
water at higher level before they unite and form big volume of water at one point
63 FampF ndash Irrigation projects along the river Godavari
[Godavari River Basin Irrigation Projects
Godavari River Delta
The Godavari River has its catchment area in five states of India Maharashtra Chattisgarh Madhya
Pradesh Andhra Pradesh Karnataka and Orissa
Dowleswaram Barrage
Jalaput
Balimela Reservoir
Upper Indravati
Nizam Sagar
Dams and bridges along the river
A barrage was built on the river at Dowleswaram was built by Sir Arthur Cotton in 1850 It was
rebuilt as a barrage and roadway during 1980s and named after him The roadway connects
Dowleswaram in East Godavari and Vijjeswaram in West Godavari
There is also a big dam built just after the source of the river at Trimbakeshwar The dam is in the
town of Gangapur which literally means a town on a river The dam provides drinking water to the
residents of Nashik and also supplies water to the thermal power station situated downstream at
Eklahara which provides power to the town
There is another multipurpose project on the Godavari River named Sri Ram Sagar Project in
Nizamabad District It is in the town of Pochampad 60km away from Nizamabad It irrigates 4
districts of Northern Telangana Region of Andhra Pradesh and supplies power
The Jayakwadi dam near Paithan is one of the largest earthen dam in India This dam was built to
address the problem of drought in Marathwada region and problem of flood along the bank of river
Two left and right canals provide the irrigation to fertile land up to Nanded district This dam has
major contribution in industrial development of Aurangabad
Source [34]]
All the dams which are at the level of 500mts AMSL will receive the water from FPC1 and thoses at
or below the level of 300mts AMSL will receive the water from FPC4
64 FampF ndash Narmada river water projects
[Narmada River
Narmada river development (NRD)
The Narmada river has a huge water resources potential as much as 3321 MAF (41000 Mcum) of
average annual flow (more than 90 of this flow occurring during the monsoon months of June ndash
September) which according to estimates is greater than the combined annual flows of the Ravi
Beas and the Sutlej rivers which feed the Indus basin The 75 dependable flow is 28 MAF (34537
MCM) Till the beginning of planned development in the country was started in 1946 this huge
potential went almost abegging without any effective utilization thus denying much needed succour
to the drought stricken people of the valley both in Madhya Pradesh and Gujarat Since then plans
have been evolved debated finally legally examined and adjudicated by a tribunal agitated by
NGOs The Supreme Court has finally intervened to ensure that the implementation of the projects is
not halted
Early background and dispute
Investigations for harnessing the Narmada waters started around the time of independence when
Central Waterways Irrigation and Navigation Commission) (CWINC) identified several storage
schemes and in 1948 the Khosla Committee prioritized the proposals and named Tawa Bargi
Punasa and Bharuch projects (the last three on the main stem of the river) for preparation of
reports The reports were ready by 1963 A parallel study of the Hydropower potential identified 16
sites with a potential of 1300 MW While the project in Gujarat called Baruch Weir project (for which
Jawaharlal Nehru laid the foundation stone in 1961) went through a series of modifications and
improvements with a reformed scheme at Navagam village to extend benefits up to the Rann of
Kutch but following the bifurcation of the erstwhile Bombay state into Maharashtra and Gujarat
states and Gujaratrsquos intent to raise the height of the dam at Navagam to maximize storage benefits
at the cost of submergence of potential hydropower sites in Maharashtra and Madhya Pradesh
created a dispute between the states This resulted in an impasse in the implementation o f the
agreed projects at Navagam in Gujarat Punasa in MP and Bargi dam in MP and power benefit
sharing among the states with MP refusing to ratify the agreements To break the logjam a high
level Committee was appointed by the Govt of India in Septembe r 1964 In 1965 the Committee
prepared a Master Plan for the basin which involved construction of 12 major projects in MP and the
Navagam dam in Gujarat It provided irrigation priority over power irrigation of 2630 kmsup2 in MP
400 kmsup2 in Maharashtra 1850 kmsup2 in Gujarat and 4000 kmsup2 in Rajasthan The storages it
recommended in MP involved Bargi Tawa and Narmadasagar (Punasa) while its proposed Navagam
high dam would submerge the hydelpower project sites of Jalasindhi (in Maharshtra) and Harinphal
(MP) but without any more submergence than would be caused by the three dams if separately
constructed Gujarat endorsed this proposal but Maharashtra was not willing to go by it After
intense parleys failed to resolve the problem GOI decided to set up the Narmada Water Disputes
Tribunal (NWDT) in 1969 under the Inter State Water Disputes Act 1956 to adjudicate on the
dispute relating to sharing of water of the inter-state river Narmada and its valley
Tribunal award After ten years of deliberations the Narmada Water Disputes Tribunal (NWDT) gave
its award in December 1979 The NWDT considering the development of the water resources of the
basin as a whole gave its award allocating share of water (after accepting the mutually agreed
settlement among the four party states in 1974 on sharing of the waters of Narmada on the basis
of a determination by the Tribunal of the height of the Navagam dam or the Sardar Sarovar dam)
and Hydro Power of the Sardar Sarovar Project
The Tribunalrsquos final order determined the utilizable quantum of Narmada waters to be 27 million
acre feet at 75 dependability and allocated it to the four states as in Table below including share
of power benefits It also stipulated the share of water when utilizable flow was in excess of 28
million acre feet The Navagam dam height was fixed at FRL 460 feet (140 m) with a maximum water
level of EL feet The Full Supply Level of the Navagam canal was fixed at 300 feet (91 m) The cost
sharing formula among the states and the consequent requirement of release of regulated releases
from the Narmada Sagar dam by MP was also spelt out The resettlement and rehabilitation package
was also clearly specified with all costs to be borne by Gujarat for all resettlement and rehabilitation
work of people affected in the three states and also for relocating any ancient or historic
monuments places of worship or idols likely to suffer submergence
Party state Alloted share of
water in million
acre feet (MAF)
share of
power
Madya Pradesh 1825 57
Gujarath 9 16
Maharastra 025 27
Rajastan 05 Nil
Total 28 100
The uniqueness of this Award is that a non riparian state ndash Rajasthan ndash has been allocated a share of
Narmada waters for meeting the water requirements of the drought prone districts of Barmer and
Jalore which have no other source of dependable water
Go ahead for the projects The work on the project did not start soon since extensive studies were
undertaken for project designing and with World Bank getting involved with funding studies and
project costs (Loan agreement with GOI of $450 million was signed in May 1985) the Resettlement
and Rehabilitation package was substantially revised over and above what was set in the NWDT
and environmental studies had to be undertaken But the environmental and forest cle arances for
the projects from the newly formed Ministry of Environment and Forests (MoEampF) involved
extensive inter-ministerial and inter departmental discussions (within the central govt and with state
govts) for a substantial period and it was only in June 1987 (almost 8 years after the NWDT award
was given in Dec 1979) that the MoEampF gave a conditional approval to the Sardar Sarovar and
Narmada Sagar Projects The Forest clearance was given in September 1987 for Sardar Sarovar only
The clearance also required the work to be done pari passu with the construction of the dams and
the filling of the reservoir In the mean time the Narmada Control Authority (NCA) an inter-State
Administrative Authority and the Sardar Sarovar Construction Advisory Committee (SSCAC) were set
up in 1980 by the Govt of India in compliance of the NWDT award the former organization was set
up in Dec 1980 as body corporate with representatives from the four party states and Govt of India
as a machinery to implement the decisions and directions of the NWDT and the later organization
was set up in Sept 1980 as a statutory body to ensure efficient economical and timely execution of
the Unit I (Dam amp appurtenant works) and Unit III (Hydropower works) of the Sardar Sarovar Project
(SSP) A Review Committee consisting of the Union Minister for Irrigation (now substituted by Union
Minister for Water Resources) as its Chairperson and the Chief Ministers of Madhya Pradesh
Maharashtra Gujarat and Rajasthan as its members is also in position to review the decisions of the
NCA and the SSCAC as required For monitoring and implementation of various environmental
activities effectively independent machinery of Environment Sub-Group is functioning since
Nov1987 under NCA Similarly for monitoring the progress of the resettlement and rehabilitation of
project affected people RampR subgroup is also functioning under the NCA At the state level Sardar
Sarovar Narmada Nigam Limited (SSNL) in Gujarat has the mandate to implement and manage the
Sardar Sarovar multipurpose project In Madhya Pradesh the Narmada Valley Development
Authority (NVDA) is vested the responsibility for implementation of the projects
Narmada River
Layout of Water Resources Development Projects in the Narmada Basin in Gujarat amp Madhya
Pradesh
Even though the tribunal award resolved the initial issue of water sharing however the height of
dam benefit sharing and the mode of settlement of project-affected people caused serious
difficulties in implementation particularly of the Sardar Sarovar dam (the terminal dam on the river)
Project-affected people agitated under the banner of the dedicated NGO - The Narmada Bachao
Andolan (NBA) The NBA followed up by Public Interest Litigation (PIL) in the Supreme Court The
NBA questioned the benefits claimed from the major projects challenged the resettlement and
rehabilitation packages for project affected people of the reservoir submergence and canal affected
zones and its implementation It also rejected the environmental impact assessments made and the
remedial actions taken by the project authorities This challenge created worldwide attention to the
major development activity planned in the valley It urged the World Bank to withdraw from the
project and the intense world wide pressure resulted in the Bank mounting an Independent Review
Mission (IRM) called the Morse Mission to review the SSP But the IRMrsquos report was neither
accepted by the Government of India or the World Bank Finally Government of India decided to
terminate further drawals from a remaining $180 million World Bank credit from the Bank with the
firm resolution that the project would be completed within the national resources
The Supreme Court has also deliberated on this issue for several years but finally upheld the Tribunal
Award and allowed the construction to proceed subject to conditions The Court introduced a
mechanism to monitor the progress of resettlement pari-passu with the raising of the height of the
dam through Grievance Redressal Authorities (GRA) in each of the party states The courtrsquos decision
referred in this document given in the year 2000 after 7 years of deliberations has paved the way
for completing the project to attain full envisaged benefits Some of the courtrsquos decisions are
essential to be quoted here (quoted in italics) to set at rest many of the distorted or incorrect
versions being presented in several of the linked Wikipedia articles on this subject
The overall plan for development ultimately conceived involves 30 major dams including Sardar
Sarovar (21 irrigation 5 hydropower and 4 multipurpose) some 135 medium dams and over three
minor dams in MP along the main stem of the river and its 41 tributaries to utilize its allocated share
of 1825 MAF before 2025 (within 45 years of the NWDT award) In addition to power generation
and irrigation within the basin water was allocated for domestic and industrial water uses and for
multipurpose trans-basin diversions to Son and Tons basins in eastern MP drought prone areas of
Saurashtra Kutch northern mainland in Gujarat and southern Rajasthan Irrigation benefits to the
extent of about 40000 to 50000 kmsup2 (of drought prone and scarcity areas) and power generation of
2600 MW were also envisaged Thus the Narmada river development is envisaged as a multi state
program for development of hydropower and irrigation dams and their associated irrigation
networks
Justice Bharucha stated that Considering the magnitude of rehabilitation involving a large
percentage of tribals loss of extensive forest area rich in biological diversity enormous
environmental cost of the project and considering the fact that the basic data on vital aspects are
still not available there could be but one conclusion that the project(s) are not ready for approval
Sardar Sarovar Project (SSP) at Navagam Subsequent to the Tribunal award and approval to the
project in 1987 by the Ministry of Water Resources with due clearances from the MoEampF
implementation of the SSP was taken up as the terminal project on the main stem of the Narmada
in Gujarat to utilize the share of allocated water to Gujarat and Rajasthan The concrete gravity dam
of 1210 m length and 163 m height above foundation with storage capacity of 77 million acre -feet
and reservoir length of 213 m extending into Gujarat Maharashtra and Madhya Pradesh is designed
to provide an annual irrigation of 18000 kmsup2 in Gujarat (covering 3360 villages of 62 talukas in 14
districts) 4260 kmsup2 in Rajasthan and hydel power generation of 1450 MW As a result of
construction of the dam over 48269 families (against 7000 families assessed in 1979 by the
Tribunal) will be affected as per the latest figures of NCA in the three States spread over 244
villages (4 fully and 240 partially - 39369 in MP in 192 villages 4163 in Maharshtra in 33 villages and
4737 in Gujarat in 19 villages) the total area affected being 37533 kmsup2 The submergence area is
broadly divided into two areas fully tribal area which covers the initial reach of about 100 or so
villages which are almost 100 tribal and hilly These include al l the 33 villages of Maharashtra (in
Nadurbar district) all 19 of Gujarat and many of the Madhya Pradesh The second part of the
submergence area is the mixed population area on the Nimad plains with a very well developed
economy that is well connected to the mainstream Considered as the largest water resources
project of India in terms of benefits some of the special features of the project are the following
Damrsquos spillway discharging capacity (307 million cusecs) is the 3rd highest in the world
With 1133 msup3s (40000 ftsup3s) capacity at the head regulator and 532 km length (458 km in
Gujarat and 74 km in Rajasthan) with 75000 km length of distribution system including field
channel the Narmada Main Canal is the largest irrigation canal in the world
The project aims at supplying 3571000 msup3day of drinking water (2900000 msup3day for domestic
consumption amp 671000 msup3day for industrial consumption) to 8215 villages amp 135 towns in Gujarat
which are presently suffering from acute shortage of water Also the project aims to provide
drinking water facilities to a population of about 1371000 in 1107 villages amp two towns in Jallore amp
Barmer districts of Rajasthan
Has the lowest ratio of submergence to area irrigated ndash being 165 of CCA against an average of
4 to 5 of other major irrigation projects
All the 6 units of River Bed Power House (RBPH) have been commissioned successfully by June 2006
and are in operation All the five units of Canal Head Power House (CHPH) have been commissioned
successfully by end of December 2004 and are in operation
The construction of the two multipurpose major projects - the Sardar Sarvoar in Gujarat and Indira
Sagar in Madya Pradesh - the two are interdependent to attain full envisaged benefits - is in progress
and substantial partial benefits have already been achieved Hence details of these two projects are
elaborated below
Sardar Sarovar Dam Gujarat partially completed (up to EL12192 m)
Largest lined canal in the World Sardar Sarovar Project
The dam has attained a height of EL12192 m ie the crest level of the spillway The gates are yet to
be erected to attain the FRL of EL 13868 m for which clearance is required from the Supreme Court
after the Grievance Redressal Committee submits its report on completion of R amp R up to that
elevation Top level of dam to be attained is EL 14650 m
The main irrigation canal has been substantially constructed for a length of 357 km Water has been
let into the canal for partial irrigation and water supply needs Further construction is in progress
Indira Sagar Project (ISP) in Madhya Pradesh at Punasa is one of the 30 major projects proposed in
the Narmada basin with the largest storage capacity in the country The project is located near
Punasa village in Khandwa District of Madhya Pradesh This Multipurpose River Valley Project
envisages construction of a concrete gravity dam 653 m long and 92 m high with gross storage
capacity of the reservoir of 1222 kmsup3 (99 MAF) and live storage of 975 kmsup3 (79MAF) to provide an
annual irrigation potential of 1690 kmsup2 and generation of 1000 MW of hydropower The project
shall also ensure supply of 006 MAF (74000000 msup3) of drinking water to rural areas in Khandwa
district In accordance with NWDT award an annual regulated flow of 812 MAF (10015 kmsup3) shall
be released to the Sardar Sarovar Project (SSP) ex-Maheshwar Project The operation of Indira Sagar
Project shall be carried out in such a way as to facilitate the regulation of Sardar Sarovar
Indira Sagar dam partially completed in Madhya Pradesh
Indira Sagar canal for irrigation
The dam and the powerhouse have been completed but storage has been restricted up to EL 260 m
under orders of the High Court Jabalpur from RampR consideration All the units of the powerhouse
have been commissioned and generation of power from the 8 units of 125 MW capacity each
commenced from Jan 2004[25]The irrigation component of the project is under a fairly advance
stage of implementation
Other completed and under construction projects Existing irrigation projects in the Narmada are the
1) Matiyari (1992) 2) Rani Avantibai Sagar (1988) 3) Barna (1978) 4) Tawa (1992-93) 5) Sukta
(1984) all in Madhya Pradesh and Karjan project in Gujarat
Projects under implementation are the 1) Bargi diversion 2) Kolar 3) Man 4) Omkareshwar
multipurpose (520 MW ndash commissioned in Nov 2007) and 5) Maheshwar (400 MW)
A large number of medium and small projects have been completed and many more are under
implementation as conceived under the overall Master Plan
Source [34]]
With the establishment of RCS all the dams and the hydroelectrical projects will get sufficient water
from the FPC1 and the West extension of FPC1 in this scenario if the levels of these projects are less
than 500 meters AMSL Problems like lsquohigh the magnitude of rehabilitation involving a large
percentage of tribals loss of extensive forest area rich in biological diversity enormous
environmental cost of the projectrsquo will not appear with RCS and all the states coming under this issue
like Madyapradesh Maharastra Gujarath and Rajastan will get more than sufficient water for
irrigation ndash industry ndash hydroelectrical projects ndash for domestic purposes
The cost will be less since (1) it involves only the creation of primary channel (2) there is no
necessity to construct the dams (3) there is no necessity to rehabilitate the people in a great way
since RCS involves very minimal area (4) no immersion of land like city and forest area in back water
in a bigger way (5) we may be creating U tubes in depressed lands in the course of primary channel
or the bi dam in a minimally depressed area but there is no back water issues in these and hence
land involved and rehabilitation are going to be less
All the water are used effectively and no water will enter the Arabian sea without being used
effectively over the land that is the more water generated beyond the storing capacity of the dam in
the rainy seasons will be effectively utilized all over the nation in the lands below 500 mts AMSL
65 FampF ndashWater dispute ndash Height of almatti dam
[Water disputes
Height of almatti dam
State gets a good deal Tribunal gives nod to raise Almatti dam height to 52425 meters
New Delhi In what could be a major relief to Karnataka the Krishna water disputes tribunal -2 has
allowed the state to build the Almatti dam up to the originally proposed height of 52425 meters
Major decisions Karnataka allowed to increase almatti dam height from 519 meters to 52425
meters Krishna waters decision Implementation Board to be set up will monitor flows Releases to
be monitored every 10 days Karnataka should release 8 to 10 tmc to AP in June and July Award to
come up for review in 2050
Water allocations Total water availability 2293tmc Andrapradesh 1001tmc Karnataka 911tmc
maharastra666tmc
This judgment has been given after 43 years of proceedings Source [37] ]
It is true by increasing the height of the dam from 519 to 52425 mts It is possible to store more
water that we can use it later
But what is the use if we are not getting sufficient water to fill the dam in one rain year As per the
calculation the total available water is 2293 TMC Andrapradesh is more benefitted from this
because there is more land available for agriculture and more population is going to be benefited If
the water generated is less then both the states are under loss The level of water (Height) in the
dam depends on the rain in the catchment area (Inflow) and the utilization in the process of
agriculture and others (out flow) If the inflow is steady throughout the year and the out flow is also
steady then both the states are going to be benefitted If we increase the height of the dam then we
may be storing more water but the back water may immerse more inhabited areas and it may
extend in the neighboring states like maharastra and other interstate issues and problems of
rehabilitation will arise
With RCS all such problems will be solved If we are creating the FPC1 at the level of 500mts AMSL
then the back water in the Almatti dam will raise only up to 500 (exactly 495) mts AMSL Any water
which is more than 500 mts AMSL will enter back in the FPC1 But the almatti dam will always be
able to relaease the water to both Karnataka and Andrapradesh what what ever amount they need
Here the total water availability 2293tmc and the allotted water to Andrapradesh 1001tmc and to
Karnataka is 911tmc Maharastra 666tmc With RCS the total water available becomes 10000 or
even more TMC and the states like Andrapradesh Karnataka and Maharastra can use 2000TMC or
even more if they want because the FPC1 will be continuously filled by the ri vers like Ganga ndash
Yamuna ndash Mahanadhi ndash Narnmada- Godhavari ndash Kaveri ndash and Krishna it iself
Thus we need not increase the height of the almatti dam lsquoin this instance onlyrsquo Increasing the height
of the dam may be the necessity in another instance that we need to discuss as such issues arises
Sources
[34] Britannica Concise Encyclopedia answerscom Wikipedia
[37] Deccan herald Mangalore Friday december31 2010 And Prajavani Kannada daily news paper
Mangalore Friday December 31 2010
benefits to Nepal and India The second part was to build embankments both below and above the
barrage so as to jacket the river within the defined channel The third part envisaged a high
multipurpose dam within Nepal at Barakshetra to provide substantial flood cushion along with large
irrigation and power benefits to both countries This was followed up by signing of the Kosi
Agreement between Nepal and India on 25 April 1954 and which was revised on 19 December 1966
to address the concerns of Nepal Further letters of Exchange to the Agreement between the two
countries provided for additional schemes for providing benefits of irri gation While the first two
parts of the concept plan have been implemented at the cost of the Government of India the third
part namely the Koshi High dam the kingpin of the whole concept for various political reasons
precluded any action for several years but has since been revived under a fresh agreement in a
modified form for further investigations and studies
Details of the above projects are elaborated below
Kosi barrage and irrigation
Kosi Barrage also called Bhimnagar Barrage after the name of the place where it was built between
the years 1959 and 1963 straddles the Indo-Nepal border It is an irrigation flood control and
hydropower generation project on the Kosi river built under a bilateral agreement between Nepal
and India the entire cost of the project was borne by India The catchment area of the river is
61788 km2 (23856 sq mi) in Nepal at the Barrage site The highest peaks ndash the Mount Everest and
the Mount Kanchenjunga mdash lie in its catchment About 10 of this catchment is snow-fed The
Eastern Canal and the Western Canal taking off from the barrage have been designed for a discharge
capacity of 455 cubic metres per second (16100 cu fts) to irrigate 6125 square kilometres
(1514000 acres) and 210 cubic metres per second (7400 cu fts) to irrigate 35661 square
kilometres (881200 acres) respectively A hydropower plant has been built on the Eastern Canal at
a canal drop (36 km (22 mi) from the Koshi Barrage) to generate 20 MW The Western Kosi Canal
provides irrigation to 250 square kilometres (62000 acres) in Nepal A valuable bridge over the
barrage opened up the East-West highway in the eastern sector of Nepal
An inundation canal taking off at Chatra where the Kosi debouches into the plains has been built to
irrigate a gross area of 860 kmsup2 in Nepal The project has been renovated with IDA assistance after
Nepal took over the project in 1976
Silt deposition near Kosi embankment at Navbhata Saharsa Bihar India
Kosi embankment system
The Kosi barrage with earth dams across river afflux bunds and embankments above and below the
river confines the river to flow within embankments Embankments on both sides downstream of
the barrage with a length of 246 km (153 mi) has been constructed to check the westward
movement of the river The embankments have been kept wide apart about 12 to 16 km (99 mi) to
serve as a silt trap
Sapta Kosi High Multipurpose Project (Indo-Nepal)
Government of India (GOI) and His Majestys Government of Nepal (HMGN) have agreed to conduct
joint investigations and other studies for the preparation of Detailed Project Report (DPR) of Sapta
Kosi High Dam Multipurpose Project and Sun Kosi Storage-cum-Diversion Scheme to meet the
objectives of both the countries for Development of a) hydropower generation b) irrigation c) flood
controlmanagement and d) navigation
A 269-metre (880 ft) high concreteRock fill dam on the Sapta Koshi River with a dam toe
underground power house with an installed capacity of 3000 MW at 50 load factor a barrage on
river Sapta Kosi about 8 km (50 mi) downstream of Sapta Kosi High Dam to re-regulate the water
being released from the Sapta Koshi dam with two canals Eastern Chhatra Canal and Western
Chhatra Canal off-taking from the either bank from barrage site to provide water for irrigation both
in Nepal and India and Navigation through Koshi up to Kursela and also in the reservoir of Sapta
Koshi dam are envisaged
A Power Canal off-taking from the Eastern Chatra Canal is proposed for conveying the water
required for irrigation at existing Kosi barrage at Hanuman Nagar and also the water which may be
required downstream of Hanuman Nagar Barrage for the purpose of navigation To utilize the head
available between Chatra and Hanuman Nagar barrages for power generation three canal Power
Houses each of 100 MW installed capacity are also proposed on power canal
Necessary cushion in storage capacity of Sapta Kosi High Dam would be provided to moderate the
flood downstream of dam
Chatra Canal System would provide irrigation to large areas in Nepal and India (particularly in Bihar)
A Joint Project Office (JPO) has been set up in Nepal for investigation of the project
Hydropower
Nepal has a total estimated potential of 83290 MW out of which economically exploitable potential
is 42140 MW The Koshi river basin contributes 22350 MW of this potential(360 MW from small
schemes and 1875 MW from major schemes) and the economically exploitable potential is assessd
as 10860 MW (includes the Sapta Koshi Multipurpose Project [3300MW] mentioned above) Source [34]]
Damages to the canal ndash embankment ndash hydroelectrical projects are the possibilities if we create the
projects at places where we can expect high flow in short time of period It is better to target the
water at higher level before they unite and form big volume of water at one point
63 FampF ndash Irrigation projects along the river Godavari
[Godavari River Basin Irrigation Projects
Godavari River Delta
The Godavari River has its catchment area in five states of India Maharashtra Chattisgarh Madhya
Pradesh Andhra Pradesh Karnataka and Orissa
Dowleswaram Barrage
Jalaput
Balimela Reservoir
Upper Indravati
Nizam Sagar
Dams and bridges along the river
A barrage was built on the river at Dowleswaram was built by Sir Arthur Cotton in 1850 It was
rebuilt as a barrage and roadway during 1980s and named after him The roadway connects
Dowleswaram in East Godavari and Vijjeswaram in West Godavari
There is also a big dam built just after the source of the river at Trimbakeshwar The dam is in the
town of Gangapur which literally means a town on a river The dam provides drinking water to the
residents of Nashik and also supplies water to the thermal power station situated downstream at
Eklahara which provides power to the town
There is another multipurpose project on the Godavari River named Sri Ram Sagar Project in
Nizamabad District It is in the town of Pochampad 60km away from Nizamabad It irrigates 4
districts of Northern Telangana Region of Andhra Pradesh and supplies power
The Jayakwadi dam near Paithan is one of the largest earthen dam in India This dam was built to
address the problem of drought in Marathwada region and problem of flood along the bank of river
Two left and right canals provide the irrigation to fertile land up to Nanded district This dam has
major contribution in industrial development of Aurangabad
Source [34]]
All the dams which are at the level of 500mts AMSL will receive the water from FPC1 and thoses at
or below the level of 300mts AMSL will receive the water from FPC4
64 FampF ndash Narmada river water projects
[Narmada River
Narmada river development (NRD)
The Narmada river has a huge water resources potential as much as 3321 MAF (41000 Mcum) of
average annual flow (more than 90 of this flow occurring during the monsoon months of June ndash
September) which according to estimates is greater than the combined annual flows of the Ravi
Beas and the Sutlej rivers which feed the Indus basin The 75 dependable flow is 28 MAF (34537
MCM) Till the beginning of planned development in the country was started in 1946 this huge
potential went almost abegging without any effective utilization thus denying much needed succour
to the drought stricken people of the valley both in Madhya Pradesh and Gujarat Since then plans
have been evolved debated finally legally examined and adjudicated by a tribunal agitated by
NGOs The Supreme Court has finally intervened to ensure that the implementation of the projects is
not halted
Early background and dispute
Investigations for harnessing the Narmada waters started around the time of independence when
Central Waterways Irrigation and Navigation Commission) (CWINC) identified several storage
schemes and in 1948 the Khosla Committee prioritized the proposals and named Tawa Bargi
Punasa and Bharuch projects (the last three on the main stem of the river) for preparation of
reports The reports were ready by 1963 A parallel study of the Hydropower potential identified 16
sites with a potential of 1300 MW While the project in Gujarat called Baruch Weir project (for which
Jawaharlal Nehru laid the foundation stone in 1961) went through a series of modifications and
improvements with a reformed scheme at Navagam village to extend benefits up to the Rann of
Kutch but following the bifurcation of the erstwhile Bombay state into Maharashtra and Gujarat
states and Gujaratrsquos intent to raise the height of the dam at Navagam to maximize storage benefits
at the cost of submergence of potential hydropower sites in Maharashtra and Madhya Pradesh
created a dispute between the states This resulted in an impasse in the implementation o f the
agreed projects at Navagam in Gujarat Punasa in MP and Bargi dam in MP and power benefit
sharing among the states with MP refusing to ratify the agreements To break the logjam a high
level Committee was appointed by the Govt of India in Septembe r 1964 In 1965 the Committee
prepared a Master Plan for the basin which involved construction of 12 major projects in MP and the
Navagam dam in Gujarat It provided irrigation priority over power irrigation of 2630 kmsup2 in MP
400 kmsup2 in Maharashtra 1850 kmsup2 in Gujarat and 4000 kmsup2 in Rajasthan The storages it
recommended in MP involved Bargi Tawa and Narmadasagar (Punasa) while its proposed Navagam
high dam would submerge the hydelpower project sites of Jalasindhi (in Maharshtra) and Harinphal
(MP) but without any more submergence than would be caused by the three dams if separately
constructed Gujarat endorsed this proposal but Maharashtra was not willing to go by it After
intense parleys failed to resolve the problem GOI decided to set up the Narmada Water Disputes
Tribunal (NWDT) in 1969 under the Inter State Water Disputes Act 1956 to adjudicate on the
dispute relating to sharing of water of the inter-state river Narmada and its valley
Tribunal award After ten years of deliberations the Narmada Water Disputes Tribunal (NWDT) gave
its award in December 1979 The NWDT considering the development of the water resources of the
basin as a whole gave its award allocating share of water (after accepting the mutually agreed
settlement among the four party states in 1974 on sharing of the waters of Narmada on the basis
of a determination by the Tribunal of the height of the Navagam dam or the Sardar Sarovar dam)
and Hydro Power of the Sardar Sarovar Project
The Tribunalrsquos final order determined the utilizable quantum of Narmada waters to be 27 million
acre feet at 75 dependability and allocated it to the four states as in Table below including share
of power benefits It also stipulated the share of water when utilizable flow was in excess of 28
million acre feet The Navagam dam height was fixed at FRL 460 feet (140 m) with a maximum water
level of EL feet The Full Supply Level of the Navagam canal was fixed at 300 feet (91 m) The cost
sharing formula among the states and the consequent requirement of release of regulated releases
from the Narmada Sagar dam by MP was also spelt out The resettlement and rehabilitation package
was also clearly specified with all costs to be borne by Gujarat for all resettlement and rehabilitation
work of people affected in the three states and also for relocating any ancient or historic
monuments places of worship or idols likely to suffer submergence
Party state Alloted share of
water in million
acre feet (MAF)
share of
power
Madya Pradesh 1825 57
Gujarath 9 16
Maharastra 025 27
Rajastan 05 Nil
Total 28 100
The uniqueness of this Award is that a non riparian state ndash Rajasthan ndash has been allocated a share of
Narmada waters for meeting the water requirements of the drought prone districts of Barmer and
Jalore which have no other source of dependable water
Go ahead for the projects The work on the project did not start soon since extensive studies were
undertaken for project designing and with World Bank getting involved with funding studies and
project costs (Loan agreement with GOI of $450 million was signed in May 1985) the Resettlement
and Rehabilitation package was substantially revised over and above what was set in the NWDT
and environmental studies had to be undertaken But the environmental and forest cle arances for
the projects from the newly formed Ministry of Environment and Forests (MoEampF) involved
extensive inter-ministerial and inter departmental discussions (within the central govt and with state
govts) for a substantial period and it was only in June 1987 (almost 8 years after the NWDT award
was given in Dec 1979) that the MoEampF gave a conditional approval to the Sardar Sarovar and
Narmada Sagar Projects The Forest clearance was given in September 1987 for Sardar Sarovar only
The clearance also required the work to be done pari passu with the construction of the dams and
the filling of the reservoir In the mean time the Narmada Control Authority (NCA) an inter-State
Administrative Authority and the Sardar Sarovar Construction Advisory Committee (SSCAC) were set
up in 1980 by the Govt of India in compliance of the NWDT award the former organization was set
up in Dec 1980 as body corporate with representatives from the four party states and Govt of India
as a machinery to implement the decisions and directions of the NWDT and the later organization
was set up in Sept 1980 as a statutory body to ensure efficient economical and timely execution of
the Unit I (Dam amp appurtenant works) and Unit III (Hydropower works) of the Sardar Sarovar Project
(SSP) A Review Committee consisting of the Union Minister for Irrigation (now substituted by Union
Minister for Water Resources) as its Chairperson and the Chief Ministers of Madhya Pradesh
Maharashtra Gujarat and Rajasthan as its members is also in position to review the decisions of the
NCA and the SSCAC as required For monitoring and implementation of various environmental
activities effectively independent machinery of Environment Sub-Group is functioning since
Nov1987 under NCA Similarly for monitoring the progress of the resettlement and rehabilitation of
project affected people RampR subgroup is also functioning under the NCA At the state level Sardar
Sarovar Narmada Nigam Limited (SSNL) in Gujarat has the mandate to implement and manage the
Sardar Sarovar multipurpose project In Madhya Pradesh the Narmada Valley Development
Authority (NVDA) is vested the responsibility for implementation of the projects
Narmada River
Layout of Water Resources Development Projects in the Narmada Basin in Gujarat amp Madhya
Pradesh
Even though the tribunal award resolved the initial issue of water sharing however the height of
dam benefit sharing and the mode of settlement of project-affected people caused serious
difficulties in implementation particularly of the Sardar Sarovar dam (the terminal dam on the river)
Project-affected people agitated under the banner of the dedicated NGO - The Narmada Bachao
Andolan (NBA) The NBA followed up by Public Interest Litigation (PIL) in the Supreme Court The
NBA questioned the benefits claimed from the major projects challenged the resettlement and
rehabilitation packages for project affected people of the reservoir submergence and canal affected
zones and its implementation It also rejected the environmental impact assessments made and the
remedial actions taken by the project authorities This challenge created worldwide attention to the
major development activity planned in the valley It urged the World Bank to withdraw from the
project and the intense world wide pressure resulted in the Bank mounting an Independent Review
Mission (IRM) called the Morse Mission to review the SSP But the IRMrsquos report was neither
accepted by the Government of India or the World Bank Finally Government of India decided to
terminate further drawals from a remaining $180 million World Bank credit from the Bank with the
firm resolution that the project would be completed within the national resources
The Supreme Court has also deliberated on this issue for several years but finally upheld the Tribunal
Award and allowed the construction to proceed subject to conditions The Court introduced a
mechanism to monitor the progress of resettlement pari-passu with the raising of the height of the
dam through Grievance Redressal Authorities (GRA) in each of the party states The courtrsquos decision
referred in this document given in the year 2000 after 7 years of deliberations has paved the way
for completing the project to attain full envisaged benefits Some of the courtrsquos decisions are
essential to be quoted here (quoted in italics) to set at rest many of the distorted or incorrect
versions being presented in several of the linked Wikipedia articles on this subject
The overall plan for development ultimately conceived involves 30 major dams including Sardar
Sarovar (21 irrigation 5 hydropower and 4 multipurpose) some 135 medium dams and over three
minor dams in MP along the main stem of the river and its 41 tributaries to utilize its allocated share
of 1825 MAF before 2025 (within 45 years of the NWDT award) In addition to power generation
and irrigation within the basin water was allocated for domestic and industrial water uses and for
multipurpose trans-basin diversions to Son and Tons basins in eastern MP drought prone areas of
Saurashtra Kutch northern mainland in Gujarat and southern Rajasthan Irrigation benefits to the
extent of about 40000 to 50000 kmsup2 (of drought prone and scarcity areas) and power generation of
2600 MW were also envisaged Thus the Narmada river development is envisaged as a multi state
program for development of hydropower and irrigation dams and their associated irrigation
networks
Justice Bharucha stated that Considering the magnitude of rehabilitation involving a large
percentage of tribals loss of extensive forest area rich in biological diversity enormous
environmental cost of the project and considering the fact that the basic data on vital aspects are
still not available there could be but one conclusion that the project(s) are not ready for approval
Sardar Sarovar Project (SSP) at Navagam Subsequent to the Tribunal award and approval to the
project in 1987 by the Ministry of Water Resources with due clearances from the MoEampF
implementation of the SSP was taken up as the terminal project on the main stem of the Narmada
in Gujarat to utilize the share of allocated water to Gujarat and Rajasthan The concrete gravity dam
of 1210 m length and 163 m height above foundation with storage capacity of 77 million acre -feet
and reservoir length of 213 m extending into Gujarat Maharashtra and Madhya Pradesh is designed
to provide an annual irrigation of 18000 kmsup2 in Gujarat (covering 3360 villages of 62 talukas in 14
districts) 4260 kmsup2 in Rajasthan and hydel power generation of 1450 MW As a result of
construction of the dam over 48269 families (against 7000 families assessed in 1979 by the
Tribunal) will be affected as per the latest figures of NCA in the three States spread over 244
villages (4 fully and 240 partially - 39369 in MP in 192 villages 4163 in Maharshtra in 33 villages and
4737 in Gujarat in 19 villages) the total area affected being 37533 kmsup2 The submergence area is
broadly divided into two areas fully tribal area which covers the initial reach of about 100 or so
villages which are almost 100 tribal and hilly These include al l the 33 villages of Maharashtra (in
Nadurbar district) all 19 of Gujarat and many of the Madhya Pradesh The second part of the
submergence area is the mixed population area on the Nimad plains with a very well developed
economy that is well connected to the mainstream Considered as the largest water resources
project of India in terms of benefits some of the special features of the project are the following
Damrsquos spillway discharging capacity (307 million cusecs) is the 3rd highest in the world
With 1133 msup3s (40000 ftsup3s) capacity at the head regulator and 532 km length (458 km in
Gujarat and 74 km in Rajasthan) with 75000 km length of distribution system including field
channel the Narmada Main Canal is the largest irrigation canal in the world
The project aims at supplying 3571000 msup3day of drinking water (2900000 msup3day for domestic
consumption amp 671000 msup3day for industrial consumption) to 8215 villages amp 135 towns in Gujarat
which are presently suffering from acute shortage of water Also the project aims to provide
drinking water facilities to a population of about 1371000 in 1107 villages amp two towns in Jallore amp
Barmer districts of Rajasthan
Has the lowest ratio of submergence to area irrigated ndash being 165 of CCA against an average of
4 to 5 of other major irrigation projects
All the 6 units of River Bed Power House (RBPH) have been commissioned successfully by June 2006
and are in operation All the five units of Canal Head Power House (CHPH) have been commissioned
successfully by end of December 2004 and are in operation
The construction of the two multipurpose major projects - the Sardar Sarvoar in Gujarat and Indira
Sagar in Madya Pradesh - the two are interdependent to attain full envisaged benefits - is in progress
and substantial partial benefits have already been achieved Hence details of these two projects are
elaborated below
Sardar Sarovar Dam Gujarat partially completed (up to EL12192 m)
Largest lined canal in the World Sardar Sarovar Project
The dam has attained a height of EL12192 m ie the crest level of the spillway The gates are yet to
be erected to attain the FRL of EL 13868 m for which clearance is required from the Supreme Court
after the Grievance Redressal Committee submits its report on completion of R amp R up to that
elevation Top level of dam to be attained is EL 14650 m
The main irrigation canal has been substantially constructed for a length of 357 km Water has been
let into the canal for partial irrigation and water supply needs Further construction is in progress
Indira Sagar Project (ISP) in Madhya Pradesh at Punasa is one of the 30 major projects proposed in
the Narmada basin with the largest storage capacity in the country The project is located near
Punasa village in Khandwa District of Madhya Pradesh This Multipurpose River Valley Project
envisages construction of a concrete gravity dam 653 m long and 92 m high with gross storage
capacity of the reservoir of 1222 kmsup3 (99 MAF) and live storage of 975 kmsup3 (79MAF) to provide an
annual irrigation potential of 1690 kmsup2 and generation of 1000 MW of hydropower The project
shall also ensure supply of 006 MAF (74000000 msup3) of drinking water to rural areas in Khandwa
district In accordance with NWDT award an annual regulated flow of 812 MAF (10015 kmsup3) shall
be released to the Sardar Sarovar Project (SSP) ex-Maheshwar Project The operation of Indira Sagar
Project shall be carried out in such a way as to facilitate the regulation of Sardar Sarovar
Indira Sagar dam partially completed in Madhya Pradesh
Indira Sagar canal for irrigation
The dam and the powerhouse have been completed but storage has been restricted up to EL 260 m
under orders of the High Court Jabalpur from RampR consideration All the units of the powerhouse
have been commissioned and generation of power from the 8 units of 125 MW capacity each
commenced from Jan 2004[25]The irrigation component of the project is under a fairly advance
stage of implementation
Other completed and under construction projects Existing irrigation projects in the Narmada are the
1) Matiyari (1992) 2) Rani Avantibai Sagar (1988) 3) Barna (1978) 4) Tawa (1992-93) 5) Sukta
(1984) all in Madhya Pradesh and Karjan project in Gujarat
Projects under implementation are the 1) Bargi diversion 2) Kolar 3) Man 4) Omkareshwar
multipurpose (520 MW ndash commissioned in Nov 2007) and 5) Maheshwar (400 MW)
A large number of medium and small projects have been completed and many more are under
implementation as conceived under the overall Master Plan
Source [34]]
With the establishment of RCS all the dams and the hydroelectrical projects will get sufficient water
from the FPC1 and the West extension of FPC1 in this scenario if the levels of these projects are less
than 500 meters AMSL Problems like lsquohigh the magnitude of rehabilitation involving a large
percentage of tribals loss of extensive forest area rich in biological diversity enormous
environmental cost of the projectrsquo will not appear with RCS and all the states coming under this issue
like Madyapradesh Maharastra Gujarath and Rajastan will get more than sufficient water for
irrigation ndash industry ndash hydroelectrical projects ndash for domestic purposes
The cost will be less since (1) it involves only the creation of primary channel (2) there is no
necessity to construct the dams (3) there is no necessity to rehabilitate the people in a great way
since RCS involves very minimal area (4) no immersion of land like city and forest area in back water
in a bigger way (5) we may be creating U tubes in depressed lands in the course of primary channel
or the bi dam in a minimally depressed area but there is no back water issues in these and hence
land involved and rehabilitation are going to be less
All the water are used effectively and no water will enter the Arabian sea without being used
effectively over the land that is the more water generated beyond the storing capacity of the dam in
the rainy seasons will be effectively utilized all over the nation in the lands below 500 mts AMSL
65 FampF ndashWater dispute ndash Height of almatti dam
[Water disputes
Height of almatti dam
State gets a good deal Tribunal gives nod to raise Almatti dam height to 52425 meters
New Delhi In what could be a major relief to Karnataka the Krishna water disputes tribunal -2 has
allowed the state to build the Almatti dam up to the originally proposed height of 52425 meters
Major decisions Karnataka allowed to increase almatti dam height from 519 meters to 52425
meters Krishna waters decision Implementation Board to be set up will monitor flows Releases to
be monitored every 10 days Karnataka should release 8 to 10 tmc to AP in June and July Award to
come up for review in 2050
Water allocations Total water availability 2293tmc Andrapradesh 1001tmc Karnataka 911tmc
maharastra666tmc
This judgment has been given after 43 years of proceedings Source [37] ]
It is true by increasing the height of the dam from 519 to 52425 mts It is possible to store more
water that we can use it later
But what is the use if we are not getting sufficient water to fill the dam in one rain year As per the
calculation the total available water is 2293 TMC Andrapradesh is more benefitted from this
because there is more land available for agriculture and more population is going to be benefited If
the water generated is less then both the states are under loss The level of water (Height) in the
dam depends on the rain in the catchment area (Inflow) and the utilization in the process of
agriculture and others (out flow) If the inflow is steady throughout the year and the out flow is also
steady then both the states are going to be benefitted If we increase the height of the dam then we
may be storing more water but the back water may immerse more inhabited areas and it may
extend in the neighboring states like maharastra and other interstate issues and problems of
rehabilitation will arise
With RCS all such problems will be solved If we are creating the FPC1 at the level of 500mts AMSL
then the back water in the Almatti dam will raise only up to 500 (exactly 495) mts AMSL Any water
which is more than 500 mts AMSL will enter back in the FPC1 But the almatti dam will always be
able to relaease the water to both Karnataka and Andrapradesh what what ever amount they need
Here the total water availability 2293tmc and the allotted water to Andrapradesh 1001tmc and to
Karnataka is 911tmc Maharastra 666tmc With RCS the total water available becomes 10000 or
even more TMC and the states like Andrapradesh Karnataka and Maharastra can use 2000TMC or
even more if they want because the FPC1 will be continuously filled by the ri vers like Ganga ndash
Yamuna ndash Mahanadhi ndash Narnmada- Godhavari ndash Kaveri ndash and Krishna it iself
Thus we need not increase the height of the almatti dam lsquoin this instance onlyrsquo Increasing the height
of the dam may be the necessity in another instance that we need to discuss as such issues arises
Sources
[34] Britannica Concise Encyclopedia answerscom Wikipedia
[37] Deccan herald Mangalore Friday december31 2010 And Prajavani Kannada daily news paper
Mangalore Friday December 31 2010
Silt deposition near Kosi embankment at Navbhata Saharsa Bihar India
Kosi embankment system
The Kosi barrage with earth dams across river afflux bunds and embankments above and below the
river confines the river to flow within embankments Embankments on both sides downstream of
the barrage with a length of 246 km (153 mi) has been constructed to check the westward
movement of the river The embankments have been kept wide apart about 12 to 16 km (99 mi) to
serve as a silt trap
Sapta Kosi High Multipurpose Project (Indo-Nepal)
Government of India (GOI) and His Majestys Government of Nepal (HMGN) have agreed to conduct
joint investigations and other studies for the preparation of Detailed Project Report (DPR) of Sapta
Kosi High Dam Multipurpose Project and Sun Kosi Storage-cum-Diversion Scheme to meet the
objectives of both the countries for Development of a) hydropower generation b) irrigation c) flood
controlmanagement and d) navigation
A 269-metre (880 ft) high concreteRock fill dam on the Sapta Koshi River with a dam toe
underground power house with an installed capacity of 3000 MW at 50 load factor a barrage on
river Sapta Kosi about 8 km (50 mi) downstream of Sapta Kosi High Dam to re-regulate the water
being released from the Sapta Koshi dam with two canals Eastern Chhatra Canal and Western
Chhatra Canal off-taking from the either bank from barrage site to provide water for irrigation both
in Nepal and India and Navigation through Koshi up to Kursela and also in the reservoir of Sapta
Koshi dam are envisaged
A Power Canal off-taking from the Eastern Chatra Canal is proposed for conveying the water
required for irrigation at existing Kosi barrage at Hanuman Nagar and also the water which may be
required downstream of Hanuman Nagar Barrage for the purpose of navigation To utilize the head
available between Chatra and Hanuman Nagar barrages for power generation three canal Power
Houses each of 100 MW installed capacity are also proposed on power canal
Necessary cushion in storage capacity of Sapta Kosi High Dam would be provided to moderate the
flood downstream of dam
Chatra Canal System would provide irrigation to large areas in Nepal and India (particularly in Bihar)
A Joint Project Office (JPO) has been set up in Nepal for investigation of the project
Hydropower
Nepal has a total estimated potential of 83290 MW out of which economically exploitable potential
is 42140 MW The Koshi river basin contributes 22350 MW of this potential(360 MW from small
schemes and 1875 MW from major schemes) and the economically exploitable potential is assessd
as 10860 MW (includes the Sapta Koshi Multipurpose Project [3300MW] mentioned above) Source [34]]
Damages to the canal ndash embankment ndash hydroelectrical projects are the possibilities if we create the
projects at places where we can expect high flow in short time of period It is better to target the
water at higher level before they unite and form big volume of water at one point
63 FampF ndash Irrigation projects along the river Godavari
[Godavari River Basin Irrigation Projects
Godavari River Delta
The Godavari River has its catchment area in five states of India Maharashtra Chattisgarh Madhya
Pradesh Andhra Pradesh Karnataka and Orissa
Dowleswaram Barrage
Jalaput
Balimela Reservoir
Upper Indravati
Nizam Sagar
Dams and bridges along the river
A barrage was built on the river at Dowleswaram was built by Sir Arthur Cotton in 1850 It was
rebuilt as a barrage and roadway during 1980s and named after him The roadway connects
Dowleswaram in East Godavari and Vijjeswaram in West Godavari
There is also a big dam built just after the source of the river at Trimbakeshwar The dam is in the
town of Gangapur which literally means a town on a river The dam provides drinking water to the
residents of Nashik and also supplies water to the thermal power station situated downstream at
Eklahara which provides power to the town
There is another multipurpose project on the Godavari River named Sri Ram Sagar Project in
Nizamabad District It is in the town of Pochampad 60km away from Nizamabad It irrigates 4
districts of Northern Telangana Region of Andhra Pradesh and supplies power
The Jayakwadi dam near Paithan is one of the largest earthen dam in India This dam was built to
address the problem of drought in Marathwada region and problem of flood along the bank of river
Two left and right canals provide the irrigation to fertile land up to Nanded district This dam has
major contribution in industrial development of Aurangabad
Source [34]]
All the dams which are at the level of 500mts AMSL will receive the water from FPC1 and thoses at
or below the level of 300mts AMSL will receive the water from FPC4
64 FampF ndash Narmada river water projects
[Narmada River
Narmada river development (NRD)
The Narmada river has a huge water resources potential as much as 3321 MAF (41000 Mcum) of
average annual flow (more than 90 of this flow occurring during the monsoon months of June ndash
September) which according to estimates is greater than the combined annual flows of the Ravi
Beas and the Sutlej rivers which feed the Indus basin The 75 dependable flow is 28 MAF (34537
MCM) Till the beginning of planned development in the country was started in 1946 this huge
potential went almost abegging without any effective utilization thus denying much needed succour
to the drought stricken people of the valley both in Madhya Pradesh and Gujarat Since then plans
have been evolved debated finally legally examined and adjudicated by a tribunal agitated by
NGOs The Supreme Court has finally intervened to ensure that the implementation of the projects is
not halted
Early background and dispute
Investigations for harnessing the Narmada waters started around the time of independence when
Central Waterways Irrigation and Navigation Commission) (CWINC) identified several storage
schemes and in 1948 the Khosla Committee prioritized the proposals and named Tawa Bargi
Punasa and Bharuch projects (the last three on the main stem of the river) for preparation of
reports The reports were ready by 1963 A parallel study of the Hydropower potential identified 16
sites with a potential of 1300 MW While the project in Gujarat called Baruch Weir project (for which
Jawaharlal Nehru laid the foundation stone in 1961) went through a series of modifications and
improvements with a reformed scheme at Navagam village to extend benefits up to the Rann of
Kutch but following the bifurcation of the erstwhile Bombay state into Maharashtra and Gujarat
states and Gujaratrsquos intent to raise the height of the dam at Navagam to maximize storage benefits
at the cost of submergence of potential hydropower sites in Maharashtra and Madhya Pradesh
created a dispute between the states This resulted in an impasse in the implementation o f the
agreed projects at Navagam in Gujarat Punasa in MP and Bargi dam in MP and power benefit
sharing among the states with MP refusing to ratify the agreements To break the logjam a high
level Committee was appointed by the Govt of India in Septembe r 1964 In 1965 the Committee
prepared a Master Plan for the basin which involved construction of 12 major projects in MP and the
Navagam dam in Gujarat It provided irrigation priority over power irrigation of 2630 kmsup2 in MP
400 kmsup2 in Maharashtra 1850 kmsup2 in Gujarat and 4000 kmsup2 in Rajasthan The storages it
recommended in MP involved Bargi Tawa and Narmadasagar (Punasa) while its proposed Navagam
high dam would submerge the hydelpower project sites of Jalasindhi (in Maharshtra) and Harinphal
(MP) but without any more submergence than would be caused by the three dams if separately
constructed Gujarat endorsed this proposal but Maharashtra was not willing to go by it After
intense parleys failed to resolve the problem GOI decided to set up the Narmada Water Disputes
Tribunal (NWDT) in 1969 under the Inter State Water Disputes Act 1956 to adjudicate on the
dispute relating to sharing of water of the inter-state river Narmada and its valley
Tribunal award After ten years of deliberations the Narmada Water Disputes Tribunal (NWDT) gave
its award in December 1979 The NWDT considering the development of the water resources of the
basin as a whole gave its award allocating share of water (after accepting the mutually agreed
settlement among the four party states in 1974 on sharing of the waters of Narmada on the basis
of a determination by the Tribunal of the height of the Navagam dam or the Sardar Sarovar dam)
and Hydro Power of the Sardar Sarovar Project
The Tribunalrsquos final order determined the utilizable quantum of Narmada waters to be 27 million
acre feet at 75 dependability and allocated it to the four states as in Table below including share
of power benefits It also stipulated the share of water when utilizable flow was in excess of 28
million acre feet The Navagam dam height was fixed at FRL 460 feet (140 m) with a maximum water
level of EL feet The Full Supply Level of the Navagam canal was fixed at 300 feet (91 m) The cost
sharing formula among the states and the consequent requirement of release of regulated releases
from the Narmada Sagar dam by MP was also spelt out The resettlement and rehabilitation package
was also clearly specified with all costs to be borne by Gujarat for all resettlement and rehabilitation
work of people affected in the three states and also for relocating any ancient or historic
monuments places of worship or idols likely to suffer submergence
Party state Alloted share of
water in million
acre feet (MAF)
share of
power
Madya Pradesh 1825 57
Gujarath 9 16
Maharastra 025 27
Rajastan 05 Nil
Total 28 100
The uniqueness of this Award is that a non riparian state ndash Rajasthan ndash has been allocated a share of
Narmada waters for meeting the water requirements of the drought prone districts of Barmer and
Jalore which have no other source of dependable water
Go ahead for the projects The work on the project did not start soon since extensive studies were
undertaken for project designing and with World Bank getting involved with funding studies and
project costs (Loan agreement with GOI of $450 million was signed in May 1985) the Resettlement
and Rehabilitation package was substantially revised over and above what was set in the NWDT
and environmental studies had to be undertaken But the environmental and forest cle arances for
the projects from the newly formed Ministry of Environment and Forests (MoEampF) involved
extensive inter-ministerial and inter departmental discussions (within the central govt and with state
govts) for a substantial period and it was only in June 1987 (almost 8 years after the NWDT award
was given in Dec 1979) that the MoEampF gave a conditional approval to the Sardar Sarovar and
Narmada Sagar Projects The Forest clearance was given in September 1987 for Sardar Sarovar only
The clearance also required the work to be done pari passu with the construction of the dams and
the filling of the reservoir In the mean time the Narmada Control Authority (NCA) an inter-State
Administrative Authority and the Sardar Sarovar Construction Advisory Committee (SSCAC) were set
up in 1980 by the Govt of India in compliance of the NWDT award the former organization was set
up in Dec 1980 as body corporate with representatives from the four party states and Govt of India
as a machinery to implement the decisions and directions of the NWDT and the later organization
was set up in Sept 1980 as a statutory body to ensure efficient economical and timely execution of
the Unit I (Dam amp appurtenant works) and Unit III (Hydropower works) of the Sardar Sarovar Project
(SSP) A Review Committee consisting of the Union Minister for Irrigation (now substituted by Union
Minister for Water Resources) as its Chairperson and the Chief Ministers of Madhya Pradesh
Maharashtra Gujarat and Rajasthan as its members is also in position to review the decisions of the
NCA and the SSCAC as required For monitoring and implementation of various environmental
activities effectively independent machinery of Environment Sub-Group is functioning since
Nov1987 under NCA Similarly for monitoring the progress of the resettlement and rehabilitation of
project affected people RampR subgroup is also functioning under the NCA At the state level Sardar
Sarovar Narmada Nigam Limited (SSNL) in Gujarat has the mandate to implement and manage the
Sardar Sarovar multipurpose project In Madhya Pradesh the Narmada Valley Development
Authority (NVDA) is vested the responsibility for implementation of the projects
Narmada River
Layout of Water Resources Development Projects in the Narmada Basin in Gujarat amp Madhya
Pradesh
Even though the tribunal award resolved the initial issue of water sharing however the height of
dam benefit sharing and the mode of settlement of project-affected people caused serious
difficulties in implementation particularly of the Sardar Sarovar dam (the terminal dam on the river)
Project-affected people agitated under the banner of the dedicated NGO - The Narmada Bachao
Andolan (NBA) The NBA followed up by Public Interest Litigation (PIL) in the Supreme Court The
NBA questioned the benefits claimed from the major projects challenged the resettlement and
rehabilitation packages for project affected people of the reservoir submergence and canal affected
zones and its implementation It also rejected the environmental impact assessments made and the
remedial actions taken by the project authorities This challenge created worldwide attention to the
major development activity planned in the valley It urged the World Bank to withdraw from the
project and the intense world wide pressure resulted in the Bank mounting an Independent Review
Mission (IRM) called the Morse Mission to review the SSP But the IRMrsquos report was neither
accepted by the Government of India or the World Bank Finally Government of India decided to
terminate further drawals from a remaining $180 million World Bank credit from the Bank with the
firm resolution that the project would be completed within the national resources
The Supreme Court has also deliberated on this issue for several years but finally upheld the Tribunal
Award and allowed the construction to proceed subject to conditions The Court introduced a
mechanism to monitor the progress of resettlement pari-passu with the raising of the height of the
dam through Grievance Redressal Authorities (GRA) in each of the party states The courtrsquos decision
referred in this document given in the year 2000 after 7 years of deliberations has paved the way
for completing the project to attain full envisaged benefits Some of the courtrsquos decisions are
essential to be quoted here (quoted in italics) to set at rest many of the distorted or incorrect
versions being presented in several of the linked Wikipedia articles on this subject
The overall plan for development ultimately conceived involves 30 major dams including Sardar
Sarovar (21 irrigation 5 hydropower and 4 multipurpose) some 135 medium dams and over three
minor dams in MP along the main stem of the river and its 41 tributaries to utilize its allocated share
of 1825 MAF before 2025 (within 45 years of the NWDT award) In addition to power generation
and irrigation within the basin water was allocated for domestic and industrial water uses and for
multipurpose trans-basin diversions to Son and Tons basins in eastern MP drought prone areas of
Saurashtra Kutch northern mainland in Gujarat and southern Rajasthan Irrigation benefits to the
extent of about 40000 to 50000 kmsup2 (of drought prone and scarcity areas) and power generation of
2600 MW were also envisaged Thus the Narmada river development is envisaged as a multi state
program for development of hydropower and irrigation dams and their associated irrigation
networks
Justice Bharucha stated that Considering the magnitude of rehabilitation involving a large
percentage of tribals loss of extensive forest area rich in biological diversity enormous
environmental cost of the project and considering the fact that the basic data on vital aspects are
still not available there could be but one conclusion that the project(s) are not ready for approval
Sardar Sarovar Project (SSP) at Navagam Subsequent to the Tribunal award and approval to the
project in 1987 by the Ministry of Water Resources with due clearances from the MoEampF
implementation of the SSP was taken up as the terminal project on the main stem of the Narmada
in Gujarat to utilize the share of allocated water to Gujarat and Rajasthan The concrete gravity dam
of 1210 m length and 163 m height above foundation with storage capacity of 77 million acre -feet
and reservoir length of 213 m extending into Gujarat Maharashtra and Madhya Pradesh is designed
to provide an annual irrigation of 18000 kmsup2 in Gujarat (covering 3360 villages of 62 talukas in 14
districts) 4260 kmsup2 in Rajasthan and hydel power generation of 1450 MW As a result of
construction of the dam over 48269 families (against 7000 families assessed in 1979 by the
Tribunal) will be affected as per the latest figures of NCA in the three States spread over 244
villages (4 fully and 240 partially - 39369 in MP in 192 villages 4163 in Maharshtra in 33 villages and
4737 in Gujarat in 19 villages) the total area affected being 37533 kmsup2 The submergence area is
broadly divided into two areas fully tribal area which covers the initial reach of about 100 or so
villages which are almost 100 tribal and hilly These include al l the 33 villages of Maharashtra (in
Nadurbar district) all 19 of Gujarat and many of the Madhya Pradesh The second part of the
submergence area is the mixed population area on the Nimad plains with a very well developed
economy that is well connected to the mainstream Considered as the largest water resources
project of India in terms of benefits some of the special features of the project are the following
Damrsquos spillway discharging capacity (307 million cusecs) is the 3rd highest in the world
With 1133 msup3s (40000 ftsup3s) capacity at the head regulator and 532 km length (458 km in
Gujarat and 74 km in Rajasthan) with 75000 km length of distribution system including field
channel the Narmada Main Canal is the largest irrigation canal in the world
The project aims at supplying 3571000 msup3day of drinking water (2900000 msup3day for domestic
consumption amp 671000 msup3day for industrial consumption) to 8215 villages amp 135 towns in Gujarat
which are presently suffering from acute shortage of water Also the project aims to provide
drinking water facilities to a population of about 1371000 in 1107 villages amp two towns in Jallore amp
Barmer districts of Rajasthan
Has the lowest ratio of submergence to area irrigated ndash being 165 of CCA against an average of
4 to 5 of other major irrigation projects
All the 6 units of River Bed Power House (RBPH) have been commissioned successfully by June 2006
and are in operation All the five units of Canal Head Power House (CHPH) have been commissioned
successfully by end of December 2004 and are in operation
The construction of the two multipurpose major projects - the Sardar Sarvoar in Gujarat and Indira
Sagar in Madya Pradesh - the two are interdependent to attain full envisaged benefits - is in progress
and substantial partial benefits have already been achieved Hence details of these two projects are
elaborated below
Sardar Sarovar Dam Gujarat partially completed (up to EL12192 m)
Largest lined canal in the World Sardar Sarovar Project
The dam has attained a height of EL12192 m ie the crest level of the spillway The gates are yet to
be erected to attain the FRL of EL 13868 m for which clearance is required from the Supreme Court
after the Grievance Redressal Committee submits its report on completion of R amp R up to that
elevation Top level of dam to be attained is EL 14650 m
The main irrigation canal has been substantially constructed for a length of 357 km Water has been
let into the canal for partial irrigation and water supply needs Further construction is in progress
Indira Sagar Project (ISP) in Madhya Pradesh at Punasa is one of the 30 major projects proposed in
the Narmada basin with the largest storage capacity in the country The project is located near
Punasa village in Khandwa District of Madhya Pradesh This Multipurpose River Valley Project
envisages construction of a concrete gravity dam 653 m long and 92 m high with gross storage
capacity of the reservoir of 1222 kmsup3 (99 MAF) and live storage of 975 kmsup3 (79MAF) to provide an
annual irrigation potential of 1690 kmsup2 and generation of 1000 MW of hydropower The project
shall also ensure supply of 006 MAF (74000000 msup3) of drinking water to rural areas in Khandwa
district In accordance with NWDT award an annual regulated flow of 812 MAF (10015 kmsup3) shall
be released to the Sardar Sarovar Project (SSP) ex-Maheshwar Project The operation of Indira Sagar
Project shall be carried out in such a way as to facilitate the regulation of Sardar Sarovar
Indira Sagar dam partially completed in Madhya Pradesh
Indira Sagar canal for irrigation
The dam and the powerhouse have been completed but storage has been restricted up to EL 260 m
under orders of the High Court Jabalpur from RampR consideration All the units of the powerhouse
have been commissioned and generation of power from the 8 units of 125 MW capacity each
commenced from Jan 2004[25]The irrigation component of the project is under a fairly advance
stage of implementation
Other completed and under construction projects Existing irrigation projects in the Narmada are the
1) Matiyari (1992) 2) Rani Avantibai Sagar (1988) 3) Barna (1978) 4) Tawa (1992-93) 5) Sukta
(1984) all in Madhya Pradesh and Karjan project in Gujarat
Projects under implementation are the 1) Bargi diversion 2) Kolar 3) Man 4) Omkareshwar
multipurpose (520 MW ndash commissioned in Nov 2007) and 5) Maheshwar (400 MW)
A large number of medium and small projects have been completed and many more are under
implementation as conceived under the overall Master Plan
Source [34]]
With the establishment of RCS all the dams and the hydroelectrical projects will get sufficient water
from the FPC1 and the West extension of FPC1 in this scenario if the levels of these projects are less
than 500 meters AMSL Problems like lsquohigh the magnitude of rehabilitation involving a large
percentage of tribals loss of extensive forest area rich in biological diversity enormous
environmental cost of the projectrsquo will not appear with RCS and all the states coming under this issue
like Madyapradesh Maharastra Gujarath and Rajastan will get more than sufficient water for
irrigation ndash industry ndash hydroelectrical projects ndash for domestic purposes
The cost will be less since (1) it involves only the creation of primary channel (2) there is no
necessity to construct the dams (3) there is no necessity to rehabilitate the people in a great way
since RCS involves very minimal area (4) no immersion of land like city and forest area in back water
in a bigger way (5) we may be creating U tubes in depressed lands in the course of primary channel
or the bi dam in a minimally depressed area but there is no back water issues in these and hence
land involved and rehabilitation are going to be less
All the water are used effectively and no water will enter the Arabian sea without being used
effectively over the land that is the more water generated beyond the storing capacity of the dam in
the rainy seasons will be effectively utilized all over the nation in the lands below 500 mts AMSL
65 FampF ndashWater dispute ndash Height of almatti dam
[Water disputes
Height of almatti dam
State gets a good deal Tribunal gives nod to raise Almatti dam height to 52425 meters
New Delhi In what could be a major relief to Karnataka the Krishna water disputes tribunal -2 has
allowed the state to build the Almatti dam up to the originally proposed height of 52425 meters
Major decisions Karnataka allowed to increase almatti dam height from 519 meters to 52425
meters Krishna waters decision Implementation Board to be set up will monitor flows Releases to
be monitored every 10 days Karnataka should release 8 to 10 tmc to AP in June and July Award to
come up for review in 2050
Water allocations Total water availability 2293tmc Andrapradesh 1001tmc Karnataka 911tmc
maharastra666tmc
This judgment has been given after 43 years of proceedings Source [37] ]
It is true by increasing the height of the dam from 519 to 52425 mts It is possible to store more
water that we can use it later
But what is the use if we are not getting sufficient water to fill the dam in one rain year As per the
calculation the total available water is 2293 TMC Andrapradesh is more benefitted from this
because there is more land available for agriculture and more population is going to be benefited If
the water generated is less then both the states are under loss The level of water (Height) in the
dam depends on the rain in the catchment area (Inflow) and the utilization in the process of
agriculture and others (out flow) If the inflow is steady throughout the year and the out flow is also
steady then both the states are going to be benefitted If we increase the height of the dam then we
may be storing more water but the back water may immerse more inhabited areas and it may
extend in the neighboring states like maharastra and other interstate issues and problems of
rehabilitation will arise
With RCS all such problems will be solved If we are creating the FPC1 at the level of 500mts AMSL
then the back water in the Almatti dam will raise only up to 500 (exactly 495) mts AMSL Any water
which is more than 500 mts AMSL will enter back in the FPC1 But the almatti dam will always be
able to relaease the water to both Karnataka and Andrapradesh what what ever amount they need
Here the total water availability 2293tmc and the allotted water to Andrapradesh 1001tmc and to
Karnataka is 911tmc Maharastra 666tmc With RCS the total water available becomes 10000 or
even more TMC and the states like Andrapradesh Karnataka and Maharastra can use 2000TMC or
even more if they want because the FPC1 will be continuously filled by the ri vers like Ganga ndash
Yamuna ndash Mahanadhi ndash Narnmada- Godhavari ndash Kaveri ndash and Krishna it iself
Thus we need not increase the height of the almatti dam lsquoin this instance onlyrsquo Increasing the height
of the dam may be the necessity in another instance that we need to discuss as such issues arises
Sources
[34] Britannica Concise Encyclopedia answerscom Wikipedia
[37] Deccan herald Mangalore Friday december31 2010 And Prajavani Kannada daily news paper
Mangalore Friday December 31 2010
Necessary cushion in storage capacity of Sapta Kosi High Dam would be provided to moderate the
flood downstream of dam
Chatra Canal System would provide irrigation to large areas in Nepal and India (particularly in Bihar)
A Joint Project Office (JPO) has been set up in Nepal for investigation of the project
Hydropower
Nepal has a total estimated potential of 83290 MW out of which economically exploitable potential
is 42140 MW The Koshi river basin contributes 22350 MW of this potential(360 MW from small
schemes and 1875 MW from major schemes) and the economically exploitable potential is assessd
as 10860 MW (includes the Sapta Koshi Multipurpose Project [3300MW] mentioned above) Source [34]]
Damages to the canal ndash embankment ndash hydroelectrical projects are the possibilities if we create the
projects at places where we can expect high flow in short time of period It is better to target the
water at higher level before they unite and form big volume of water at one point
63 FampF ndash Irrigation projects along the river Godavari
[Godavari River Basin Irrigation Projects
Godavari River Delta
The Godavari River has its catchment area in five states of India Maharashtra Chattisgarh Madhya
Pradesh Andhra Pradesh Karnataka and Orissa
Dowleswaram Barrage
Jalaput
Balimela Reservoir
Upper Indravati
Nizam Sagar
Dams and bridges along the river
A barrage was built on the river at Dowleswaram was built by Sir Arthur Cotton in 1850 It was
rebuilt as a barrage and roadway during 1980s and named after him The roadway connects
Dowleswaram in East Godavari and Vijjeswaram in West Godavari
There is also a big dam built just after the source of the river at Trimbakeshwar The dam is in the
town of Gangapur which literally means a town on a river The dam provides drinking water to the
residents of Nashik and also supplies water to the thermal power station situated downstream at
Eklahara which provides power to the town
There is another multipurpose project on the Godavari River named Sri Ram Sagar Project in
Nizamabad District It is in the town of Pochampad 60km away from Nizamabad It irrigates 4
districts of Northern Telangana Region of Andhra Pradesh and supplies power
The Jayakwadi dam near Paithan is one of the largest earthen dam in India This dam was built to
address the problem of drought in Marathwada region and problem of flood along the bank of river
Two left and right canals provide the irrigation to fertile land up to Nanded district This dam has
major contribution in industrial development of Aurangabad
Source [34]]
All the dams which are at the level of 500mts AMSL will receive the water from FPC1 and thoses at
or below the level of 300mts AMSL will receive the water from FPC4
64 FampF ndash Narmada river water projects
[Narmada River
Narmada river development (NRD)
The Narmada river has a huge water resources potential as much as 3321 MAF (41000 Mcum) of
average annual flow (more than 90 of this flow occurring during the monsoon months of June ndash
September) which according to estimates is greater than the combined annual flows of the Ravi
Beas and the Sutlej rivers which feed the Indus basin The 75 dependable flow is 28 MAF (34537
MCM) Till the beginning of planned development in the country was started in 1946 this huge
potential went almost abegging without any effective utilization thus denying much needed succour
to the drought stricken people of the valley both in Madhya Pradesh and Gujarat Since then plans
have been evolved debated finally legally examined and adjudicated by a tribunal agitated by
NGOs The Supreme Court has finally intervened to ensure that the implementation of the projects is
not halted
Early background and dispute
Investigations for harnessing the Narmada waters started around the time of independence when
Central Waterways Irrigation and Navigation Commission) (CWINC) identified several storage
schemes and in 1948 the Khosla Committee prioritized the proposals and named Tawa Bargi
Punasa and Bharuch projects (the last three on the main stem of the river) for preparation of
reports The reports were ready by 1963 A parallel study of the Hydropower potential identified 16
sites with a potential of 1300 MW While the project in Gujarat called Baruch Weir project (for which
Jawaharlal Nehru laid the foundation stone in 1961) went through a series of modifications and
improvements with a reformed scheme at Navagam village to extend benefits up to the Rann of
Kutch but following the bifurcation of the erstwhile Bombay state into Maharashtra and Gujarat
states and Gujaratrsquos intent to raise the height of the dam at Navagam to maximize storage benefits
at the cost of submergence of potential hydropower sites in Maharashtra and Madhya Pradesh
created a dispute between the states This resulted in an impasse in the implementation o f the
agreed projects at Navagam in Gujarat Punasa in MP and Bargi dam in MP and power benefit
sharing among the states with MP refusing to ratify the agreements To break the logjam a high
level Committee was appointed by the Govt of India in Septembe r 1964 In 1965 the Committee
prepared a Master Plan for the basin which involved construction of 12 major projects in MP and the
Navagam dam in Gujarat It provided irrigation priority over power irrigation of 2630 kmsup2 in MP
400 kmsup2 in Maharashtra 1850 kmsup2 in Gujarat and 4000 kmsup2 in Rajasthan The storages it
recommended in MP involved Bargi Tawa and Narmadasagar (Punasa) while its proposed Navagam
high dam would submerge the hydelpower project sites of Jalasindhi (in Maharshtra) and Harinphal
(MP) but without any more submergence than would be caused by the three dams if separately
constructed Gujarat endorsed this proposal but Maharashtra was not willing to go by it After
intense parleys failed to resolve the problem GOI decided to set up the Narmada Water Disputes
Tribunal (NWDT) in 1969 under the Inter State Water Disputes Act 1956 to adjudicate on the
dispute relating to sharing of water of the inter-state river Narmada and its valley
Tribunal award After ten years of deliberations the Narmada Water Disputes Tribunal (NWDT) gave
its award in December 1979 The NWDT considering the development of the water resources of the
basin as a whole gave its award allocating share of water (after accepting the mutually agreed
settlement among the four party states in 1974 on sharing of the waters of Narmada on the basis
of a determination by the Tribunal of the height of the Navagam dam or the Sardar Sarovar dam)
and Hydro Power of the Sardar Sarovar Project
The Tribunalrsquos final order determined the utilizable quantum of Narmada waters to be 27 million
acre feet at 75 dependability and allocated it to the four states as in Table below including share
of power benefits It also stipulated the share of water when utilizable flow was in excess of 28
million acre feet The Navagam dam height was fixed at FRL 460 feet (140 m) with a maximum water
level of EL feet The Full Supply Level of the Navagam canal was fixed at 300 feet (91 m) The cost
sharing formula among the states and the consequent requirement of release of regulated releases
from the Narmada Sagar dam by MP was also spelt out The resettlement and rehabilitation package
was also clearly specified with all costs to be borne by Gujarat for all resettlement and rehabilitation
work of people affected in the three states and also for relocating any ancient or historic
monuments places of worship or idols likely to suffer submergence
Party state Alloted share of
water in million
acre feet (MAF)
share of
power
Madya Pradesh 1825 57
Gujarath 9 16
Maharastra 025 27
Rajastan 05 Nil
Total 28 100
The uniqueness of this Award is that a non riparian state ndash Rajasthan ndash has been allocated a share of
Narmada waters for meeting the water requirements of the drought prone districts of Barmer and
Jalore which have no other source of dependable water
Go ahead for the projects The work on the project did not start soon since extensive studies were
undertaken for project designing and with World Bank getting involved with funding studies and
project costs (Loan agreement with GOI of $450 million was signed in May 1985) the Resettlement
and Rehabilitation package was substantially revised over and above what was set in the NWDT
and environmental studies had to be undertaken But the environmental and forest cle arances for
the projects from the newly formed Ministry of Environment and Forests (MoEampF) involved
extensive inter-ministerial and inter departmental discussions (within the central govt and with state
govts) for a substantial period and it was only in June 1987 (almost 8 years after the NWDT award
was given in Dec 1979) that the MoEampF gave a conditional approval to the Sardar Sarovar and
Narmada Sagar Projects The Forest clearance was given in September 1987 for Sardar Sarovar only
The clearance also required the work to be done pari passu with the construction of the dams and
the filling of the reservoir In the mean time the Narmada Control Authority (NCA) an inter-State
Administrative Authority and the Sardar Sarovar Construction Advisory Committee (SSCAC) were set
up in 1980 by the Govt of India in compliance of the NWDT award the former organization was set
up in Dec 1980 as body corporate with representatives from the four party states and Govt of India
as a machinery to implement the decisions and directions of the NWDT and the later organization
was set up in Sept 1980 as a statutory body to ensure efficient economical and timely execution of
the Unit I (Dam amp appurtenant works) and Unit III (Hydropower works) of the Sardar Sarovar Project
(SSP) A Review Committee consisting of the Union Minister for Irrigation (now substituted by Union
Minister for Water Resources) as its Chairperson and the Chief Ministers of Madhya Pradesh
Maharashtra Gujarat and Rajasthan as its members is also in position to review the decisions of the
NCA and the SSCAC as required For monitoring and implementation of various environmental
activities effectively independent machinery of Environment Sub-Group is functioning since
Nov1987 under NCA Similarly for monitoring the progress of the resettlement and rehabilitation of
project affected people RampR subgroup is also functioning under the NCA At the state level Sardar
Sarovar Narmada Nigam Limited (SSNL) in Gujarat has the mandate to implement and manage the
Sardar Sarovar multipurpose project In Madhya Pradesh the Narmada Valley Development
Authority (NVDA) is vested the responsibility for implementation of the projects
Narmada River
Layout of Water Resources Development Projects in the Narmada Basin in Gujarat amp Madhya
Pradesh
Even though the tribunal award resolved the initial issue of water sharing however the height of
dam benefit sharing and the mode of settlement of project-affected people caused serious
difficulties in implementation particularly of the Sardar Sarovar dam (the terminal dam on the river)
Project-affected people agitated under the banner of the dedicated NGO - The Narmada Bachao
Andolan (NBA) The NBA followed up by Public Interest Litigation (PIL) in the Supreme Court The
NBA questioned the benefits claimed from the major projects challenged the resettlement and
rehabilitation packages for project affected people of the reservoir submergence and canal affected
zones and its implementation It also rejected the environmental impact assessments made and the
remedial actions taken by the project authorities This challenge created worldwide attention to the
major development activity planned in the valley It urged the World Bank to withdraw from the
project and the intense world wide pressure resulted in the Bank mounting an Independent Review
Mission (IRM) called the Morse Mission to review the SSP But the IRMrsquos report was neither
accepted by the Government of India or the World Bank Finally Government of India decided to
terminate further drawals from a remaining $180 million World Bank credit from the Bank with the
firm resolution that the project would be completed within the national resources
The Supreme Court has also deliberated on this issue for several years but finally upheld the Tribunal
Award and allowed the construction to proceed subject to conditions The Court introduced a
mechanism to monitor the progress of resettlement pari-passu with the raising of the height of the
dam through Grievance Redressal Authorities (GRA) in each of the party states The courtrsquos decision
referred in this document given in the year 2000 after 7 years of deliberations has paved the way
for completing the project to attain full envisaged benefits Some of the courtrsquos decisions are
essential to be quoted here (quoted in italics) to set at rest many of the distorted or incorrect
versions being presented in several of the linked Wikipedia articles on this subject
The overall plan for development ultimately conceived involves 30 major dams including Sardar
Sarovar (21 irrigation 5 hydropower and 4 multipurpose) some 135 medium dams and over three
minor dams in MP along the main stem of the river and its 41 tributaries to utilize its allocated share
of 1825 MAF before 2025 (within 45 years of the NWDT award) In addition to power generation
and irrigation within the basin water was allocated for domestic and industrial water uses and for
multipurpose trans-basin diversions to Son and Tons basins in eastern MP drought prone areas of
Saurashtra Kutch northern mainland in Gujarat and southern Rajasthan Irrigation benefits to the
extent of about 40000 to 50000 kmsup2 (of drought prone and scarcity areas) and power generation of
2600 MW were also envisaged Thus the Narmada river development is envisaged as a multi state
program for development of hydropower and irrigation dams and their associated irrigation
networks
Justice Bharucha stated that Considering the magnitude of rehabilitation involving a large
percentage of tribals loss of extensive forest area rich in biological diversity enormous
environmental cost of the project and considering the fact that the basic data on vital aspects are
still not available there could be but one conclusion that the project(s) are not ready for approval
Sardar Sarovar Project (SSP) at Navagam Subsequent to the Tribunal award and approval to the
project in 1987 by the Ministry of Water Resources with due clearances from the MoEampF
implementation of the SSP was taken up as the terminal project on the main stem of the Narmada
in Gujarat to utilize the share of allocated water to Gujarat and Rajasthan The concrete gravity dam
of 1210 m length and 163 m height above foundation with storage capacity of 77 million acre -feet
and reservoir length of 213 m extending into Gujarat Maharashtra and Madhya Pradesh is designed
to provide an annual irrigation of 18000 kmsup2 in Gujarat (covering 3360 villages of 62 talukas in 14
districts) 4260 kmsup2 in Rajasthan and hydel power generation of 1450 MW As a result of
construction of the dam over 48269 families (against 7000 families assessed in 1979 by the
Tribunal) will be affected as per the latest figures of NCA in the three States spread over 244
villages (4 fully and 240 partially - 39369 in MP in 192 villages 4163 in Maharshtra in 33 villages and
4737 in Gujarat in 19 villages) the total area affected being 37533 kmsup2 The submergence area is
broadly divided into two areas fully tribal area which covers the initial reach of about 100 or so
villages which are almost 100 tribal and hilly These include al l the 33 villages of Maharashtra (in
Nadurbar district) all 19 of Gujarat and many of the Madhya Pradesh The second part of the
submergence area is the mixed population area on the Nimad plains with a very well developed
economy that is well connected to the mainstream Considered as the largest water resources
project of India in terms of benefits some of the special features of the project are the following
Damrsquos spillway discharging capacity (307 million cusecs) is the 3rd highest in the world
With 1133 msup3s (40000 ftsup3s) capacity at the head regulator and 532 km length (458 km in
Gujarat and 74 km in Rajasthan) with 75000 km length of distribution system including field
channel the Narmada Main Canal is the largest irrigation canal in the world
The project aims at supplying 3571000 msup3day of drinking water (2900000 msup3day for domestic
consumption amp 671000 msup3day for industrial consumption) to 8215 villages amp 135 towns in Gujarat
which are presently suffering from acute shortage of water Also the project aims to provide
drinking water facilities to a population of about 1371000 in 1107 villages amp two towns in Jallore amp
Barmer districts of Rajasthan
Has the lowest ratio of submergence to area irrigated ndash being 165 of CCA against an average of
4 to 5 of other major irrigation projects
All the 6 units of River Bed Power House (RBPH) have been commissioned successfully by June 2006
and are in operation All the five units of Canal Head Power House (CHPH) have been commissioned
successfully by end of December 2004 and are in operation
The construction of the two multipurpose major projects - the Sardar Sarvoar in Gujarat and Indira
Sagar in Madya Pradesh - the two are interdependent to attain full envisaged benefits - is in progress
and substantial partial benefits have already been achieved Hence details of these two projects are
elaborated below
Sardar Sarovar Dam Gujarat partially completed (up to EL12192 m)
Largest lined canal in the World Sardar Sarovar Project
The dam has attained a height of EL12192 m ie the crest level of the spillway The gates are yet to
be erected to attain the FRL of EL 13868 m for which clearance is required from the Supreme Court
after the Grievance Redressal Committee submits its report on completion of R amp R up to that
elevation Top level of dam to be attained is EL 14650 m
The main irrigation canal has been substantially constructed for a length of 357 km Water has been
let into the canal for partial irrigation and water supply needs Further construction is in progress
Indira Sagar Project (ISP) in Madhya Pradesh at Punasa is one of the 30 major projects proposed in
the Narmada basin with the largest storage capacity in the country The project is located near
Punasa village in Khandwa District of Madhya Pradesh This Multipurpose River Valley Project
envisages construction of a concrete gravity dam 653 m long and 92 m high with gross storage
capacity of the reservoir of 1222 kmsup3 (99 MAF) and live storage of 975 kmsup3 (79MAF) to provide an
annual irrigation potential of 1690 kmsup2 and generation of 1000 MW of hydropower The project
shall also ensure supply of 006 MAF (74000000 msup3) of drinking water to rural areas in Khandwa
district In accordance with NWDT award an annual regulated flow of 812 MAF (10015 kmsup3) shall
be released to the Sardar Sarovar Project (SSP) ex-Maheshwar Project The operation of Indira Sagar
Project shall be carried out in such a way as to facilitate the regulation of Sardar Sarovar
Indira Sagar dam partially completed in Madhya Pradesh
Indira Sagar canal for irrigation
The dam and the powerhouse have been completed but storage has been restricted up to EL 260 m
under orders of the High Court Jabalpur from RampR consideration All the units of the powerhouse
have been commissioned and generation of power from the 8 units of 125 MW capacity each
commenced from Jan 2004[25]The irrigation component of the project is under a fairly advance
stage of implementation
Other completed and under construction projects Existing irrigation projects in the Narmada are the
1) Matiyari (1992) 2) Rani Avantibai Sagar (1988) 3) Barna (1978) 4) Tawa (1992-93) 5) Sukta
(1984) all in Madhya Pradesh and Karjan project in Gujarat
Projects under implementation are the 1) Bargi diversion 2) Kolar 3) Man 4) Omkareshwar
multipurpose (520 MW ndash commissioned in Nov 2007) and 5) Maheshwar (400 MW)
A large number of medium and small projects have been completed and many more are under
implementation as conceived under the overall Master Plan
Source [34]]
With the establishment of RCS all the dams and the hydroelectrical projects will get sufficient water
from the FPC1 and the West extension of FPC1 in this scenario if the levels of these projects are less
than 500 meters AMSL Problems like lsquohigh the magnitude of rehabilitation involving a large
percentage of tribals loss of extensive forest area rich in biological diversity enormous
environmental cost of the projectrsquo will not appear with RCS and all the states coming under this issue
like Madyapradesh Maharastra Gujarath and Rajastan will get more than sufficient water for
irrigation ndash industry ndash hydroelectrical projects ndash for domestic purposes
The cost will be less since (1) it involves only the creation of primary channel (2) there is no
necessity to construct the dams (3) there is no necessity to rehabilitate the people in a great way
since RCS involves very minimal area (4) no immersion of land like city and forest area in back water
in a bigger way (5) we may be creating U tubes in depressed lands in the course of primary channel
or the bi dam in a minimally depressed area but there is no back water issues in these and hence
land involved and rehabilitation are going to be less
All the water are used effectively and no water will enter the Arabian sea without being used
effectively over the land that is the more water generated beyond the storing capacity of the dam in
the rainy seasons will be effectively utilized all over the nation in the lands below 500 mts AMSL
65 FampF ndashWater dispute ndash Height of almatti dam
[Water disputes
Height of almatti dam
State gets a good deal Tribunal gives nod to raise Almatti dam height to 52425 meters
New Delhi In what could be a major relief to Karnataka the Krishna water disputes tribunal -2 has
allowed the state to build the Almatti dam up to the originally proposed height of 52425 meters
Major decisions Karnataka allowed to increase almatti dam height from 519 meters to 52425
meters Krishna waters decision Implementation Board to be set up will monitor flows Releases to
be monitored every 10 days Karnataka should release 8 to 10 tmc to AP in June and July Award to
come up for review in 2050
Water allocations Total water availability 2293tmc Andrapradesh 1001tmc Karnataka 911tmc
maharastra666tmc
This judgment has been given after 43 years of proceedings Source [37] ]
It is true by increasing the height of the dam from 519 to 52425 mts It is possible to store more
water that we can use it later
But what is the use if we are not getting sufficient water to fill the dam in one rain year As per the
calculation the total available water is 2293 TMC Andrapradesh is more benefitted from this
because there is more land available for agriculture and more population is going to be benefited If
the water generated is less then both the states are under loss The level of water (Height) in the
dam depends on the rain in the catchment area (Inflow) and the utilization in the process of
agriculture and others (out flow) If the inflow is steady throughout the year and the out flow is also
steady then both the states are going to be benefitted If we increase the height of the dam then we
may be storing more water but the back water may immerse more inhabited areas and it may
extend in the neighboring states like maharastra and other interstate issues and problems of
rehabilitation will arise
With RCS all such problems will be solved If we are creating the FPC1 at the level of 500mts AMSL
then the back water in the Almatti dam will raise only up to 500 (exactly 495) mts AMSL Any water
which is more than 500 mts AMSL will enter back in the FPC1 But the almatti dam will always be
able to relaease the water to both Karnataka and Andrapradesh what what ever amount they need
Here the total water availability 2293tmc and the allotted water to Andrapradesh 1001tmc and to
Karnataka is 911tmc Maharastra 666tmc With RCS the total water available becomes 10000 or
even more TMC and the states like Andrapradesh Karnataka and Maharastra can use 2000TMC or
even more if they want because the FPC1 will be continuously filled by the ri vers like Ganga ndash
Yamuna ndash Mahanadhi ndash Narnmada- Godhavari ndash Kaveri ndash and Krishna it iself
Thus we need not increase the height of the almatti dam lsquoin this instance onlyrsquo Increasing the height
of the dam may be the necessity in another instance that we need to discuss as such issues arises
Sources
[34] Britannica Concise Encyclopedia answerscom Wikipedia
[37] Deccan herald Mangalore Friday december31 2010 And Prajavani Kannada daily news paper
Mangalore Friday December 31 2010
Nizam Sagar
Dams and bridges along the river
A barrage was built on the river at Dowleswaram was built by Sir Arthur Cotton in 1850 It was
rebuilt as a barrage and roadway during 1980s and named after him The roadway connects
Dowleswaram in East Godavari and Vijjeswaram in West Godavari
There is also a big dam built just after the source of the river at Trimbakeshwar The dam is in the
town of Gangapur which literally means a town on a river The dam provides drinking water to the
residents of Nashik and also supplies water to the thermal power station situated downstream at
Eklahara which provides power to the town
There is another multipurpose project on the Godavari River named Sri Ram Sagar Project in
Nizamabad District It is in the town of Pochampad 60km away from Nizamabad It irrigates 4
districts of Northern Telangana Region of Andhra Pradesh and supplies power
The Jayakwadi dam near Paithan is one of the largest earthen dam in India This dam was built to
address the problem of drought in Marathwada region and problem of flood along the bank of river
Two left and right canals provide the irrigation to fertile land up to Nanded district This dam has
major contribution in industrial development of Aurangabad
Source [34]]
All the dams which are at the level of 500mts AMSL will receive the water from FPC1 and thoses at
or below the level of 300mts AMSL will receive the water from FPC4
64 FampF ndash Narmada river water projects
[Narmada River
Narmada river development (NRD)
The Narmada river has a huge water resources potential as much as 3321 MAF (41000 Mcum) of
average annual flow (more than 90 of this flow occurring during the monsoon months of June ndash
September) which according to estimates is greater than the combined annual flows of the Ravi
Beas and the Sutlej rivers which feed the Indus basin The 75 dependable flow is 28 MAF (34537
MCM) Till the beginning of planned development in the country was started in 1946 this huge
potential went almost abegging without any effective utilization thus denying much needed succour
to the drought stricken people of the valley both in Madhya Pradesh and Gujarat Since then plans
have been evolved debated finally legally examined and adjudicated by a tribunal agitated by
NGOs The Supreme Court has finally intervened to ensure that the implementation of the projects is
not halted
Early background and dispute
Investigations for harnessing the Narmada waters started around the time of independence when
Central Waterways Irrigation and Navigation Commission) (CWINC) identified several storage
schemes and in 1948 the Khosla Committee prioritized the proposals and named Tawa Bargi
Punasa and Bharuch projects (the last three on the main stem of the river) for preparation of
reports The reports were ready by 1963 A parallel study of the Hydropower potential identified 16
sites with a potential of 1300 MW While the project in Gujarat called Baruch Weir project (for which
Jawaharlal Nehru laid the foundation stone in 1961) went through a series of modifications and
improvements with a reformed scheme at Navagam village to extend benefits up to the Rann of
Kutch but following the bifurcation of the erstwhile Bombay state into Maharashtra and Gujarat
states and Gujaratrsquos intent to raise the height of the dam at Navagam to maximize storage benefits
at the cost of submergence of potential hydropower sites in Maharashtra and Madhya Pradesh
created a dispute between the states This resulted in an impasse in the implementation o f the
agreed projects at Navagam in Gujarat Punasa in MP and Bargi dam in MP and power benefit
sharing among the states with MP refusing to ratify the agreements To break the logjam a high
level Committee was appointed by the Govt of India in Septembe r 1964 In 1965 the Committee
prepared a Master Plan for the basin which involved construction of 12 major projects in MP and the
Navagam dam in Gujarat It provided irrigation priority over power irrigation of 2630 kmsup2 in MP
400 kmsup2 in Maharashtra 1850 kmsup2 in Gujarat and 4000 kmsup2 in Rajasthan The storages it
recommended in MP involved Bargi Tawa and Narmadasagar (Punasa) while its proposed Navagam
high dam would submerge the hydelpower project sites of Jalasindhi (in Maharshtra) and Harinphal
(MP) but without any more submergence than would be caused by the three dams if separately
constructed Gujarat endorsed this proposal but Maharashtra was not willing to go by it After
intense parleys failed to resolve the problem GOI decided to set up the Narmada Water Disputes
Tribunal (NWDT) in 1969 under the Inter State Water Disputes Act 1956 to adjudicate on the
dispute relating to sharing of water of the inter-state river Narmada and its valley
Tribunal award After ten years of deliberations the Narmada Water Disputes Tribunal (NWDT) gave
its award in December 1979 The NWDT considering the development of the water resources of the
basin as a whole gave its award allocating share of water (after accepting the mutually agreed
settlement among the four party states in 1974 on sharing of the waters of Narmada on the basis
of a determination by the Tribunal of the height of the Navagam dam or the Sardar Sarovar dam)
and Hydro Power of the Sardar Sarovar Project
The Tribunalrsquos final order determined the utilizable quantum of Narmada waters to be 27 million
acre feet at 75 dependability and allocated it to the four states as in Table below including share
of power benefits It also stipulated the share of water when utilizable flow was in excess of 28
million acre feet The Navagam dam height was fixed at FRL 460 feet (140 m) with a maximum water
level of EL feet The Full Supply Level of the Navagam canal was fixed at 300 feet (91 m) The cost
sharing formula among the states and the consequent requirement of release of regulated releases
from the Narmada Sagar dam by MP was also spelt out The resettlement and rehabilitation package
was also clearly specified with all costs to be borne by Gujarat for all resettlement and rehabilitation
work of people affected in the three states and also for relocating any ancient or historic
monuments places of worship or idols likely to suffer submergence
Party state Alloted share of
water in million
acre feet (MAF)
share of
power
Madya Pradesh 1825 57
Gujarath 9 16
Maharastra 025 27
Rajastan 05 Nil
Total 28 100
The uniqueness of this Award is that a non riparian state ndash Rajasthan ndash has been allocated a share of
Narmada waters for meeting the water requirements of the drought prone districts of Barmer and
Jalore which have no other source of dependable water
Go ahead for the projects The work on the project did not start soon since extensive studies were
undertaken for project designing and with World Bank getting involved with funding studies and
project costs (Loan agreement with GOI of $450 million was signed in May 1985) the Resettlement
and Rehabilitation package was substantially revised over and above what was set in the NWDT
and environmental studies had to be undertaken But the environmental and forest cle arances for
the projects from the newly formed Ministry of Environment and Forests (MoEampF) involved
extensive inter-ministerial and inter departmental discussions (within the central govt and with state
govts) for a substantial period and it was only in June 1987 (almost 8 years after the NWDT award
was given in Dec 1979) that the MoEampF gave a conditional approval to the Sardar Sarovar and
Narmada Sagar Projects The Forest clearance was given in September 1987 for Sardar Sarovar only
The clearance also required the work to be done pari passu with the construction of the dams and
the filling of the reservoir In the mean time the Narmada Control Authority (NCA) an inter-State
Administrative Authority and the Sardar Sarovar Construction Advisory Committee (SSCAC) were set
up in 1980 by the Govt of India in compliance of the NWDT award the former organization was set
up in Dec 1980 as body corporate with representatives from the four party states and Govt of India
as a machinery to implement the decisions and directions of the NWDT and the later organization
was set up in Sept 1980 as a statutory body to ensure efficient economical and timely execution of
the Unit I (Dam amp appurtenant works) and Unit III (Hydropower works) of the Sardar Sarovar Project
(SSP) A Review Committee consisting of the Union Minister for Irrigation (now substituted by Union
Minister for Water Resources) as its Chairperson and the Chief Ministers of Madhya Pradesh
Maharashtra Gujarat and Rajasthan as its members is also in position to review the decisions of the
NCA and the SSCAC as required For monitoring and implementation of various environmental
activities effectively independent machinery of Environment Sub-Group is functioning since
Nov1987 under NCA Similarly for monitoring the progress of the resettlement and rehabilitation of
project affected people RampR subgroup is also functioning under the NCA At the state level Sardar
Sarovar Narmada Nigam Limited (SSNL) in Gujarat has the mandate to implement and manage the
Sardar Sarovar multipurpose project In Madhya Pradesh the Narmada Valley Development
Authority (NVDA) is vested the responsibility for implementation of the projects
Narmada River
Layout of Water Resources Development Projects in the Narmada Basin in Gujarat amp Madhya
Pradesh
Even though the tribunal award resolved the initial issue of water sharing however the height of
dam benefit sharing and the mode of settlement of project-affected people caused serious
difficulties in implementation particularly of the Sardar Sarovar dam (the terminal dam on the river)
Project-affected people agitated under the banner of the dedicated NGO - The Narmada Bachao
Andolan (NBA) The NBA followed up by Public Interest Litigation (PIL) in the Supreme Court The
NBA questioned the benefits claimed from the major projects challenged the resettlement and
rehabilitation packages for project affected people of the reservoir submergence and canal affected
zones and its implementation It also rejected the environmental impact assessments made and the
remedial actions taken by the project authorities This challenge created worldwide attention to the
major development activity planned in the valley It urged the World Bank to withdraw from the
project and the intense world wide pressure resulted in the Bank mounting an Independent Review
Mission (IRM) called the Morse Mission to review the SSP But the IRMrsquos report was neither
accepted by the Government of India or the World Bank Finally Government of India decided to
terminate further drawals from a remaining $180 million World Bank credit from the Bank with the
firm resolution that the project would be completed within the national resources
The Supreme Court has also deliberated on this issue for several years but finally upheld the Tribunal
Award and allowed the construction to proceed subject to conditions The Court introduced a
mechanism to monitor the progress of resettlement pari-passu with the raising of the height of the
dam through Grievance Redressal Authorities (GRA) in each of the party states The courtrsquos decision
referred in this document given in the year 2000 after 7 years of deliberations has paved the way
for completing the project to attain full envisaged benefits Some of the courtrsquos decisions are
essential to be quoted here (quoted in italics) to set at rest many of the distorted or incorrect
versions being presented in several of the linked Wikipedia articles on this subject
The overall plan for development ultimately conceived involves 30 major dams including Sardar
Sarovar (21 irrigation 5 hydropower and 4 multipurpose) some 135 medium dams and over three
minor dams in MP along the main stem of the river and its 41 tributaries to utilize its allocated share
of 1825 MAF before 2025 (within 45 years of the NWDT award) In addition to power generation
and irrigation within the basin water was allocated for domestic and industrial water uses and for
multipurpose trans-basin diversions to Son and Tons basins in eastern MP drought prone areas of
Saurashtra Kutch northern mainland in Gujarat and southern Rajasthan Irrigation benefits to the
extent of about 40000 to 50000 kmsup2 (of drought prone and scarcity areas) and power generation of
2600 MW were also envisaged Thus the Narmada river development is envisaged as a multi state
program for development of hydropower and irrigation dams and their associated irrigation
networks
Justice Bharucha stated that Considering the magnitude of rehabilitation involving a large
percentage of tribals loss of extensive forest area rich in biological diversity enormous
environmental cost of the project and considering the fact that the basic data on vital aspects are
still not available there could be but one conclusion that the project(s) are not ready for approval
Sardar Sarovar Project (SSP) at Navagam Subsequent to the Tribunal award and approval to the
project in 1987 by the Ministry of Water Resources with due clearances from the MoEampF
implementation of the SSP was taken up as the terminal project on the main stem of the Narmada
in Gujarat to utilize the share of allocated water to Gujarat and Rajasthan The concrete gravity dam
of 1210 m length and 163 m height above foundation with storage capacity of 77 million acre -feet
and reservoir length of 213 m extending into Gujarat Maharashtra and Madhya Pradesh is designed
to provide an annual irrigation of 18000 kmsup2 in Gujarat (covering 3360 villages of 62 talukas in 14
districts) 4260 kmsup2 in Rajasthan and hydel power generation of 1450 MW As a result of
construction of the dam over 48269 families (against 7000 families assessed in 1979 by the
Tribunal) will be affected as per the latest figures of NCA in the three States spread over 244
villages (4 fully and 240 partially - 39369 in MP in 192 villages 4163 in Maharshtra in 33 villages and
4737 in Gujarat in 19 villages) the total area affected being 37533 kmsup2 The submergence area is
broadly divided into two areas fully tribal area which covers the initial reach of about 100 or so
villages which are almost 100 tribal and hilly These include al l the 33 villages of Maharashtra (in
Nadurbar district) all 19 of Gujarat and many of the Madhya Pradesh The second part of the
submergence area is the mixed population area on the Nimad plains with a very well developed
economy that is well connected to the mainstream Considered as the largest water resources
project of India in terms of benefits some of the special features of the project are the following
Damrsquos spillway discharging capacity (307 million cusecs) is the 3rd highest in the world
With 1133 msup3s (40000 ftsup3s) capacity at the head regulator and 532 km length (458 km in
Gujarat and 74 km in Rajasthan) with 75000 km length of distribution system including field
channel the Narmada Main Canal is the largest irrigation canal in the world
The project aims at supplying 3571000 msup3day of drinking water (2900000 msup3day for domestic
consumption amp 671000 msup3day for industrial consumption) to 8215 villages amp 135 towns in Gujarat
which are presently suffering from acute shortage of water Also the project aims to provide
drinking water facilities to a population of about 1371000 in 1107 villages amp two towns in Jallore amp
Barmer districts of Rajasthan
Has the lowest ratio of submergence to area irrigated ndash being 165 of CCA against an average of
4 to 5 of other major irrigation projects
All the 6 units of River Bed Power House (RBPH) have been commissioned successfully by June 2006
and are in operation All the five units of Canal Head Power House (CHPH) have been commissioned
successfully by end of December 2004 and are in operation
The construction of the two multipurpose major projects - the Sardar Sarvoar in Gujarat and Indira
Sagar in Madya Pradesh - the two are interdependent to attain full envisaged benefits - is in progress
and substantial partial benefits have already been achieved Hence details of these two projects are
elaborated below
Sardar Sarovar Dam Gujarat partially completed (up to EL12192 m)
Largest lined canal in the World Sardar Sarovar Project
The dam has attained a height of EL12192 m ie the crest level of the spillway The gates are yet to
be erected to attain the FRL of EL 13868 m for which clearance is required from the Supreme Court
after the Grievance Redressal Committee submits its report on completion of R amp R up to that
elevation Top level of dam to be attained is EL 14650 m
The main irrigation canal has been substantially constructed for a length of 357 km Water has been
let into the canal for partial irrigation and water supply needs Further construction is in progress
Indira Sagar Project (ISP) in Madhya Pradesh at Punasa is one of the 30 major projects proposed in
the Narmada basin with the largest storage capacity in the country The project is located near
Punasa village in Khandwa District of Madhya Pradesh This Multipurpose River Valley Project
envisages construction of a concrete gravity dam 653 m long and 92 m high with gross storage
capacity of the reservoir of 1222 kmsup3 (99 MAF) and live storage of 975 kmsup3 (79MAF) to provide an
annual irrigation potential of 1690 kmsup2 and generation of 1000 MW of hydropower The project
shall also ensure supply of 006 MAF (74000000 msup3) of drinking water to rural areas in Khandwa
district In accordance with NWDT award an annual regulated flow of 812 MAF (10015 kmsup3) shall
be released to the Sardar Sarovar Project (SSP) ex-Maheshwar Project The operation of Indira Sagar
Project shall be carried out in such a way as to facilitate the regulation of Sardar Sarovar
Indira Sagar dam partially completed in Madhya Pradesh
Indira Sagar canal for irrigation
The dam and the powerhouse have been completed but storage has been restricted up to EL 260 m
under orders of the High Court Jabalpur from RampR consideration All the units of the powerhouse
have been commissioned and generation of power from the 8 units of 125 MW capacity each
commenced from Jan 2004[25]The irrigation component of the project is under a fairly advance
stage of implementation
Other completed and under construction projects Existing irrigation projects in the Narmada are the
1) Matiyari (1992) 2) Rani Avantibai Sagar (1988) 3) Barna (1978) 4) Tawa (1992-93) 5) Sukta
(1984) all in Madhya Pradesh and Karjan project in Gujarat
Projects under implementation are the 1) Bargi diversion 2) Kolar 3) Man 4) Omkareshwar
multipurpose (520 MW ndash commissioned in Nov 2007) and 5) Maheshwar (400 MW)
A large number of medium and small projects have been completed and many more are under
implementation as conceived under the overall Master Plan
Source [34]]
With the establishment of RCS all the dams and the hydroelectrical projects will get sufficient water
from the FPC1 and the West extension of FPC1 in this scenario if the levels of these projects are less
than 500 meters AMSL Problems like lsquohigh the magnitude of rehabilitation involving a large
percentage of tribals loss of extensive forest area rich in biological diversity enormous
environmental cost of the projectrsquo will not appear with RCS and all the states coming under this issue
like Madyapradesh Maharastra Gujarath and Rajastan will get more than sufficient water for
irrigation ndash industry ndash hydroelectrical projects ndash for domestic purposes
The cost will be less since (1) it involves only the creation of primary channel (2) there is no
necessity to construct the dams (3) there is no necessity to rehabilitate the people in a great way
since RCS involves very minimal area (4) no immersion of land like city and forest area in back water
in a bigger way (5) we may be creating U tubes in depressed lands in the course of primary channel
or the bi dam in a minimally depressed area but there is no back water issues in these and hence
land involved and rehabilitation are going to be less
All the water are used effectively and no water will enter the Arabian sea without being used
effectively over the land that is the more water generated beyond the storing capacity of the dam in
the rainy seasons will be effectively utilized all over the nation in the lands below 500 mts AMSL
65 FampF ndashWater dispute ndash Height of almatti dam
[Water disputes
Height of almatti dam
State gets a good deal Tribunal gives nod to raise Almatti dam height to 52425 meters
New Delhi In what could be a major relief to Karnataka the Krishna water disputes tribunal -2 has
allowed the state to build the Almatti dam up to the originally proposed height of 52425 meters
Major decisions Karnataka allowed to increase almatti dam height from 519 meters to 52425
meters Krishna waters decision Implementation Board to be set up will monitor flows Releases to
be monitored every 10 days Karnataka should release 8 to 10 tmc to AP in June and July Award to
come up for review in 2050
Water allocations Total water availability 2293tmc Andrapradesh 1001tmc Karnataka 911tmc
maharastra666tmc
This judgment has been given after 43 years of proceedings Source [37] ]
It is true by increasing the height of the dam from 519 to 52425 mts It is possible to store more
water that we can use it later
But what is the use if we are not getting sufficient water to fill the dam in one rain year As per the
calculation the total available water is 2293 TMC Andrapradesh is more benefitted from this
because there is more land available for agriculture and more population is going to be benefited If
the water generated is less then both the states are under loss The level of water (Height) in the
dam depends on the rain in the catchment area (Inflow) and the utilization in the process of
agriculture and others (out flow) If the inflow is steady throughout the year and the out flow is also
steady then both the states are going to be benefitted If we increase the height of the dam then we
may be storing more water but the back water may immerse more inhabited areas and it may
extend in the neighboring states like maharastra and other interstate issues and problems of
rehabilitation will arise
With RCS all such problems will be solved If we are creating the FPC1 at the level of 500mts AMSL
then the back water in the Almatti dam will raise only up to 500 (exactly 495) mts AMSL Any water
which is more than 500 mts AMSL will enter back in the FPC1 But the almatti dam will always be
able to relaease the water to both Karnataka and Andrapradesh what what ever amount they need
Here the total water availability 2293tmc and the allotted water to Andrapradesh 1001tmc and to
Karnataka is 911tmc Maharastra 666tmc With RCS the total water available becomes 10000 or
even more TMC and the states like Andrapradesh Karnataka and Maharastra can use 2000TMC or
even more if they want because the FPC1 will be continuously filled by the ri vers like Ganga ndash
Yamuna ndash Mahanadhi ndash Narnmada- Godhavari ndash Kaveri ndash and Krishna it iself
Thus we need not increase the height of the almatti dam lsquoin this instance onlyrsquo Increasing the height
of the dam may be the necessity in another instance that we need to discuss as such issues arises
Sources
[34] Britannica Concise Encyclopedia answerscom Wikipedia
[37] Deccan herald Mangalore Friday december31 2010 And Prajavani Kannada daily news paper
Mangalore Friday December 31 2010
Early background and dispute
Investigations for harnessing the Narmada waters started around the time of independence when
Central Waterways Irrigation and Navigation Commission) (CWINC) identified several storage
schemes and in 1948 the Khosla Committee prioritized the proposals and named Tawa Bargi
Punasa and Bharuch projects (the last three on the main stem of the river) for preparation of
reports The reports were ready by 1963 A parallel study of the Hydropower potential identified 16
sites with a potential of 1300 MW While the project in Gujarat called Baruch Weir project (for which
Jawaharlal Nehru laid the foundation stone in 1961) went through a series of modifications and
improvements with a reformed scheme at Navagam village to extend benefits up to the Rann of
Kutch but following the bifurcation of the erstwhile Bombay state into Maharashtra and Gujarat
states and Gujaratrsquos intent to raise the height of the dam at Navagam to maximize storage benefits
at the cost of submergence of potential hydropower sites in Maharashtra and Madhya Pradesh
created a dispute between the states This resulted in an impasse in the implementation o f the
agreed projects at Navagam in Gujarat Punasa in MP and Bargi dam in MP and power benefit
sharing among the states with MP refusing to ratify the agreements To break the logjam a high
level Committee was appointed by the Govt of India in Septembe r 1964 In 1965 the Committee
prepared a Master Plan for the basin which involved construction of 12 major projects in MP and the
Navagam dam in Gujarat It provided irrigation priority over power irrigation of 2630 kmsup2 in MP
400 kmsup2 in Maharashtra 1850 kmsup2 in Gujarat and 4000 kmsup2 in Rajasthan The storages it
recommended in MP involved Bargi Tawa and Narmadasagar (Punasa) while its proposed Navagam
high dam would submerge the hydelpower project sites of Jalasindhi (in Maharshtra) and Harinphal
(MP) but without any more submergence than would be caused by the three dams if separately
constructed Gujarat endorsed this proposal but Maharashtra was not willing to go by it After
intense parleys failed to resolve the problem GOI decided to set up the Narmada Water Disputes
Tribunal (NWDT) in 1969 under the Inter State Water Disputes Act 1956 to adjudicate on the
dispute relating to sharing of water of the inter-state river Narmada and its valley
Tribunal award After ten years of deliberations the Narmada Water Disputes Tribunal (NWDT) gave
its award in December 1979 The NWDT considering the development of the water resources of the
basin as a whole gave its award allocating share of water (after accepting the mutually agreed
settlement among the four party states in 1974 on sharing of the waters of Narmada on the basis
of a determination by the Tribunal of the height of the Navagam dam or the Sardar Sarovar dam)
and Hydro Power of the Sardar Sarovar Project
The Tribunalrsquos final order determined the utilizable quantum of Narmada waters to be 27 million
acre feet at 75 dependability and allocated it to the four states as in Table below including share
of power benefits It also stipulated the share of water when utilizable flow was in excess of 28
million acre feet The Navagam dam height was fixed at FRL 460 feet (140 m) with a maximum water
level of EL feet The Full Supply Level of the Navagam canal was fixed at 300 feet (91 m) The cost
sharing formula among the states and the consequent requirement of release of regulated releases
from the Narmada Sagar dam by MP was also spelt out The resettlement and rehabilitation package
was also clearly specified with all costs to be borne by Gujarat for all resettlement and rehabilitation
work of people affected in the three states and also for relocating any ancient or historic
monuments places of worship or idols likely to suffer submergence
Party state Alloted share of
water in million
acre feet (MAF)
share of
power
Madya Pradesh 1825 57
Gujarath 9 16
Maharastra 025 27
Rajastan 05 Nil
Total 28 100
The uniqueness of this Award is that a non riparian state ndash Rajasthan ndash has been allocated a share of
Narmada waters for meeting the water requirements of the drought prone districts of Barmer and
Jalore which have no other source of dependable water
Go ahead for the projects The work on the project did not start soon since extensive studies were
undertaken for project designing and with World Bank getting involved with funding studies and
project costs (Loan agreement with GOI of $450 million was signed in May 1985) the Resettlement
and Rehabilitation package was substantially revised over and above what was set in the NWDT
and environmental studies had to be undertaken But the environmental and forest cle arances for
the projects from the newly formed Ministry of Environment and Forests (MoEampF) involved
extensive inter-ministerial and inter departmental discussions (within the central govt and with state
govts) for a substantial period and it was only in June 1987 (almost 8 years after the NWDT award
was given in Dec 1979) that the MoEampF gave a conditional approval to the Sardar Sarovar and
Narmada Sagar Projects The Forest clearance was given in September 1987 for Sardar Sarovar only
The clearance also required the work to be done pari passu with the construction of the dams and
the filling of the reservoir In the mean time the Narmada Control Authority (NCA) an inter-State
Administrative Authority and the Sardar Sarovar Construction Advisory Committee (SSCAC) were set
up in 1980 by the Govt of India in compliance of the NWDT award the former organization was set
up in Dec 1980 as body corporate with representatives from the four party states and Govt of India
as a machinery to implement the decisions and directions of the NWDT and the later organization
was set up in Sept 1980 as a statutory body to ensure efficient economical and timely execution of
the Unit I (Dam amp appurtenant works) and Unit III (Hydropower works) of the Sardar Sarovar Project
(SSP) A Review Committee consisting of the Union Minister for Irrigation (now substituted by Union
Minister for Water Resources) as its Chairperson and the Chief Ministers of Madhya Pradesh
Maharashtra Gujarat and Rajasthan as its members is also in position to review the decisions of the
NCA and the SSCAC as required For monitoring and implementation of various environmental
activities effectively independent machinery of Environment Sub-Group is functioning since
Nov1987 under NCA Similarly for monitoring the progress of the resettlement and rehabilitation of
project affected people RampR subgroup is also functioning under the NCA At the state level Sardar
Sarovar Narmada Nigam Limited (SSNL) in Gujarat has the mandate to implement and manage the
Sardar Sarovar multipurpose project In Madhya Pradesh the Narmada Valley Development
Authority (NVDA) is vested the responsibility for implementation of the projects
Narmada River
Layout of Water Resources Development Projects in the Narmada Basin in Gujarat amp Madhya
Pradesh
Even though the tribunal award resolved the initial issue of water sharing however the height of
dam benefit sharing and the mode of settlement of project-affected people caused serious
difficulties in implementation particularly of the Sardar Sarovar dam (the terminal dam on the river)
Project-affected people agitated under the banner of the dedicated NGO - The Narmada Bachao
Andolan (NBA) The NBA followed up by Public Interest Litigation (PIL) in the Supreme Court The
NBA questioned the benefits claimed from the major projects challenged the resettlement and
rehabilitation packages for project affected people of the reservoir submergence and canal affected
zones and its implementation It also rejected the environmental impact assessments made and the
remedial actions taken by the project authorities This challenge created worldwide attention to the
major development activity planned in the valley It urged the World Bank to withdraw from the
project and the intense world wide pressure resulted in the Bank mounting an Independent Review
Mission (IRM) called the Morse Mission to review the SSP But the IRMrsquos report was neither
accepted by the Government of India or the World Bank Finally Government of India decided to
terminate further drawals from a remaining $180 million World Bank credit from the Bank with the
firm resolution that the project would be completed within the national resources
The Supreme Court has also deliberated on this issue for several years but finally upheld the Tribunal
Award and allowed the construction to proceed subject to conditions The Court introduced a
mechanism to monitor the progress of resettlement pari-passu with the raising of the height of the
dam through Grievance Redressal Authorities (GRA) in each of the party states The courtrsquos decision
referred in this document given in the year 2000 after 7 years of deliberations has paved the way
for completing the project to attain full envisaged benefits Some of the courtrsquos decisions are
essential to be quoted here (quoted in italics) to set at rest many of the distorted or incorrect
versions being presented in several of the linked Wikipedia articles on this subject
The overall plan for development ultimately conceived involves 30 major dams including Sardar
Sarovar (21 irrigation 5 hydropower and 4 multipurpose) some 135 medium dams and over three
minor dams in MP along the main stem of the river and its 41 tributaries to utilize its allocated share
of 1825 MAF before 2025 (within 45 years of the NWDT award) In addition to power generation
and irrigation within the basin water was allocated for domestic and industrial water uses and for
multipurpose trans-basin diversions to Son and Tons basins in eastern MP drought prone areas of
Saurashtra Kutch northern mainland in Gujarat and southern Rajasthan Irrigation benefits to the
extent of about 40000 to 50000 kmsup2 (of drought prone and scarcity areas) and power generation of
2600 MW were also envisaged Thus the Narmada river development is envisaged as a multi state
program for development of hydropower and irrigation dams and their associated irrigation
networks
Justice Bharucha stated that Considering the magnitude of rehabilitation involving a large
percentage of tribals loss of extensive forest area rich in biological diversity enormous
environmental cost of the project and considering the fact that the basic data on vital aspects are
still not available there could be but one conclusion that the project(s) are not ready for approval
Sardar Sarovar Project (SSP) at Navagam Subsequent to the Tribunal award and approval to the
project in 1987 by the Ministry of Water Resources with due clearances from the MoEampF
implementation of the SSP was taken up as the terminal project on the main stem of the Narmada
in Gujarat to utilize the share of allocated water to Gujarat and Rajasthan The concrete gravity dam
of 1210 m length and 163 m height above foundation with storage capacity of 77 million acre -feet
and reservoir length of 213 m extending into Gujarat Maharashtra and Madhya Pradesh is designed
to provide an annual irrigation of 18000 kmsup2 in Gujarat (covering 3360 villages of 62 talukas in 14
districts) 4260 kmsup2 in Rajasthan and hydel power generation of 1450 MW As a result of
construction of the dam over 48269 families (against 7000 families assessed in 1979 by the
Tribunal) will be affected as per the latest figures of NCA in the three States spread over 244
villages (4 fully and 240 partially - 39369 in MP in 192 villages 4163 in Maharshtra in 33 villages and
4737 in Gujarat in 19 villages) the total area affected being 37533 kmsup2 The submergence area is
broadly divided into two areas fully tribal area which covers the initial reach of about 100 or so
villages which are almost 100 tribal and hilly These include al l the 33 villages of Maharashtra (in
Nadurbar district) all 19 of Gujarat and many of the Madhya Pradesh The second part of the
submergence area is the mixed population area on the Nimad plains with a very well developed
economy that is well connected to the mainstream Considered as the largest water resources
project of India in terms of benefits some of the special features of the project are the following
Damrsquos spillway discharging capacity (307 million cusecs) is the 3rd highest in the world
With 1133 msup3s (40000 ftsup3s) capacity at the head regulator and 532 km length (458 km in
Gujarat and 74 km in Rajasthan) with 75000 km length of distribution system including field
channel the Narmada Main Canal is the largest irrigation canal in the world
The project aims at supplying 3571000 msup3day of drinking water (2900000 msup3day for domestic
consumption amp 671000 msup3day for industrial consumption) to 8215 villages amp 135 towns in Gujarat
which are presently suffering from acute shortage of water Also the project aims to provide
drinking water facilities to a population of about 1371000 in 1107 villages amp two towns in Jallore amp
Barmer districts of Rajasthan
Has the lowest ratio of submergence to area irrigated ndash being 165 of CCA against an average of
4 to 5 of other major irrigation projects
All the 6 units of River Bed Power House (RBPH) have been commissioned successfully by June 2006
and are in operation All the five units of Canal Head Power House (CHPH) have been commissioned
successfully by end of December 2004 and are in operation
The construction of the two multipurpose major projects - the Sardar Sarvoar in Gujarat and Indira
Sagar in Madya Pradesh - the two are interdependent to attain full envisaged benefits - is in progress
and substantial partial benefits have already been achieved Hence details of these two projects are
elaborated below
Sardar Sarovar Dam Gujarat partially completed (up to EL12192 m)
Largest lined canal in the World Sardar Sarovar Project
The dam has attained a height of EL12192 m ie the crest level of the spillway The gates are yet to
be erected to attain the FRL of EL 13868 m for which clearance is required from the Supreme Court
after the Grievance Redressal Committee submits its report on completion of R amp R up to that
elevation Top level of dam to be attained is EL 14650 m
The main irrigation canal has been substantially constructed for a length of 357 km Water has been
let into the canal for partial irrigation and water supply needs Further construction is in progress
Indira Sagar Project (ISP) in Madhya Pradesh at Punasa is one of the 30 major projects proposed in
the Narmada basin with the largest storage capacity in the country The project is located near
Punasa village in Khandwa District of Madhya Pradesh This Multipurpose River Valley Project
envisages construction of a concrete gravity dam 653 m long and 92 m high with gross storage
capacity of the reservoir of 1222 kmsup3 (99 MAF) and live storage of 975 kmsup3 (79MAF) to provide an
annual irrigation potential of 1690 kmsup2 and generation of 1000 MW of hydropower The project
shall also ensure supply of 006 MAF (74000000 msup3) of drinking water to rural areas in Khandwa
district In accordance with NWDT award an annual regulated flow of 812 MAF (10015 kmsup3) shall
be released to the Sardar Sarovar Project (SSP) ex-Maheshwar Project The operation of Indira Sagar
Project shall be carried out in such a way as to facilitate the regulation of Sardar Sarovar
Indira Sagar dam partially completed in Madhya Pradesh
Indira Sagar canal for irrigation
The dam and the powerhouse have been completed but storage has been restricted up to EL 260 m
under orders of the High Court Jabalpur from RampR consideration All the units of the powerhouse
have been commissioned and generation of power from the 8 units of 125 MW capacity each
commenced from Jan 2004[25]The irrigation component of the project is under a fairly advance
stage of implementation
Other completed and under construction projects Existing irrigation projects in the Narmada are the
1) Matiyari (1992) 2) Rani Avantibai Sagar (1988) 3) Barna (1978) 4) Tawa (1992-93) 5) Sukta
(1984) all in Madhya Pradesh and Karjan project in Gujarat
Projects under implementation are the 1) Bargi diversion 2) Kolar 3) Man 4) Omkareshwar
multipurpose (520 MW ndash commissioned in Nov 2007) and 5) Maheshwar (400 MW)
A large number of medium and small projects have been completed and many more are under
implementation as conceived under the overall Master Plan
Source [34]]
With the establishment of RCS all the dams and the hydroelectrical projects will get sufficient water
from the FPC1 and the West extension of FPC1 in this scenario if the levels of these projects are less
than 500 meters AMSL Problems like lsquohigh the magnitude of rehabilitation involving a large
percentage of tribals loss of extensive forest area rich in biological diversity enormous
environmental cost of the projectrsquo will not appear with RCS and all the states coming under this issue
like Madyapradesh Maharastra Gujarath and Rajastan will get more than sufficient water for
irrigation ndash industry ndash hydroelectrical projects ndash for domestic purposes
The cost will be less since (1) it involves only the creation of primary channel (2) there is no
necessity to construct the dams (3) there is no necessity to rehabilitate the people in a great way
since RCS involves very minimal area (4) no immersion of land like city and forest area in back water
in a bigger way (5) we may be creating U tubes in depressed lands in the course of primary channel
or the bi dam in a minimally depressed area but there is no back water issues in these and hence
land involved and rehabilitation are going to be less
All the water are used effectively and no water will enter the Arabian sea without being used
effectively over the land that is the more water generated beyond the storing capacity of the dam in
the rainy seasons will be effectively utilized all over the nation in the lands below 500 mts AMSL
65 FampF ndashWater dispute ndash Height of almatti dam
[Water disputes
Height of almatti dam
State gets a good deal Tribunal gives nod to raise Almatti dam height to 52425 meters
New Delhi In what could be a major relief to Karnataka the Krishna water disputes tribunal -2 has
allowed the state to build the Almatti dam up to the originally proposed height of 52425 meters
Major decisions Karnataka allowed to increase almatti dam height from 519 meters to 52425
meters Krishna waters decision Implementation Board to be set up will monitor flows Releases to
be monitored every 10 days Karnataka should release 8 to 10 tmc to AP in June and July Award to
come up for review in 2050
Water allocations Total water availability 2293tmc Andrapradesh 1001tmc Karnataka 911tmc
maharastra666tmc
This judgment has been given after 43 years of proceedings Source [37] ]
It is true by increasing the height of the dam from 519 to 52425 mts It is possible to store more
water that we can use it later
But what is the use if we are not getting sufficient water to fill the dam in one rain year As per the
calculation the total available water is 2293 TMC Andrapradesh is more benefitted from this
because there is more land available for agriculture and more population is going to be benefited If
the water generated is less then both the states are under loss The level of water (Height) in the
dam depends on the rain in the catchment area (Inflow) and the utilization in the process of
agriculture and others (out flow) If the inflow is steady throughout the year and the out flow is also
steady then both the states are going to be benefitted If we increase the height of the dam then we
may be storing more water but the back water may immerse more inhabited areas and it may
extend in the neighboring states like maharastra and other interstate issues and problems of
rehabilitation will arise
With RCS all such problems will be solved If we are creating the FPC1 at the level of 500mts AMSL
then the back water in the Almatti dam will raise only up to 500 (exactly 495) mts AMSL Any water
which is more than 500 mts AMSL will enter back in the FPC1 But the almatti dam will always be
able to relaease the water to both Karnataka and Andrapradesh what what ever amount they need
Here the total water availability 2293tmc and the allotted water to Andrapradesh 1001tmc and to
Karnataka is 911tmc Maharastra 666tmc With RCS the total water available becomes 10000 or
even more TMC and the states like Andrapradesh Karnataka and Maharastra can use 2000TMC or
even more if they want because the FPC1 will be continuously filled by the ri vers like Ganga ndash
Yamuna ndash Mahanadhi ndash Narnmada- Godhavari ndash Kaveri ndash and Krishna it iself
Thus we need not increase the height of the almatti dam lsquoin this instance onlyrsquo Increasing the height
of the dam may be the necessity in another instance that we need to discuss as such issues arises
Sources
[34] Britannica Concise Encyclopedia answerscom Wikipedia
[37] Deccan herald Mangalore Friday december31 2010 And Prajavani Kannada daily news paper
Mangalore Friday December 31 2010
Party state Alloted share of
water in million
acre feet (MAF)
share of
power
Madya Pradesh 1825 57
Gujarath 9 16
Maharastra 025 27
Rajastan 05 Nil
Total 28 100
The uniqueness of this Award is that a non riparian state ndash Rajasthan ndash has been allocated a share of
Narmada waters for meeting the water requirements of the drought prone districts of Barmer and
Jalore which have no other source of dependable water
Go ahead for the projects The work on the project did not start soon since extensive studies were
undertaken for project designing and with World Bank getting involved with funding studies and
project costs (Loan agreement with GOI of $450 million was signed in May 1985) the Resettlement
and Rehabilitation package was substantially revised over and above what was set in the NWDT
and environmental studies had to be undertaken But the environmental and forest cle arances for
the projects from the newly formed Ministry of Environment and Forests (MoEampF) involved
extensive inter-ministerial and inter departmental discussions (within the central govt and with state
govts) for a substantial period and it was only in June 1987 (almost 8 years after the NWDT award
was given in Dec 1979) that the MoEampF gave a conditional approval to the Sardar Sarovar and
Narmada Sagar Projects The Forest clearance was given in September 1987 for Sardar Sarovar only
The clearance also required the work to be done pari passu with the construction of the dams and
the filling of the reservoir In the mean time the Narmada Control Authority (NCA) an inter-State
Administrative Authority and the Sardar Sarovar Construction Advisory Committee (SSCAC) were set
up in 1980 by the Govt of India in compliance of the NWDT award the former organization was set
up in Dec 1980 as body corporate with representatives from the four party states and Govt of India
as a machinery to implement the decisions and directions of the NWDT and the later organization
was set up in Sept 1980 as a statutory body to ensure efficient economical and timely execution of
the Unit I (Dam amp appurtenant works) and Unit III (Hydropower works) of the Sardar Sarovar Project
(SSP) A Review Committee consisting of the Union Minister for Irrigation (now substituted by Union
Minister for Water Resources) as its Chairperson and the Chief Ministers of Madhya Pradesh
Maharashtra Gujarat and Rajasthan as its members is also in position to review the decisions of the
NCA and the SSCAC as required For monitoring and implementation of various environmental
activities effectively independent machinery of Environment Sub-Group is functioning since
Nov1987 under NCA Similarly for monitoring the progress of the resettlement and rehabilitation of
project affected people RampR subgroup is also functioning under the NCA At the state level Sardar
Sarovar Narmada Nigam Limited (SSNL) in Gujarat has the mandate to implement and manage the
Sardar Sarovar multipurpose project In Madhya Pradesh the Narmada Valley Development
Authority (NVDA) is vested the responsibility for implementation of the projects
Narmada River
Layout of Water Resources Development Projects in the Narmada Basin in Gujarat amp Madhya
Pradesh
Even though the tribunal award resolved the initial issue of water sharing however the height of
dam benefit sharing and the mode of settlement of project-affected people caused serious
difficulties in implementation particularly of the Sardar Sarovar dam (the terminal dam on the river)
Project-affected people agitated under the banner of the dedicated NGO - The Narmada Bachao
Andolan (NBA) The NBA followed up by Public Interest Litigation (PIL) in the Supreme Court The
NBA questioned the benefits claimed from the major projects challenged the resettlement and
rehabilitation packages for project affected people of the reservoir submergence and canal affected
zones and its implementation It also rejected the environmental impact assessments made and the
remedial actions taken by the project authorities This challenge created worldwide attention to the
major development activity planned in the valley It urged the World Bank to withdraw from the
project and the intense world wide pressure resulted in the Bank mounting an Independent Review
Mission (IRM) called the Morse Mission to review the SSP But the IRMrsquos report was neither
accepted by the Government of India or the World Bank Finally Government of India decided to
terminate further drawals from a remaining $180 million World Bank credit from the Bank with the
firm resolution that the project would be completed within the national resources
The Supreme Court has also deliberated on this issue for several years but finally upheld the Tribunal
Award and allowed the construction to proceed subject to conditions The Court introduced a
mechanism to monitor the progress of resettlement pari-passu with the raising of the height of the
dam through Grievance Redressal Authorities (GRA) in each of the party states The courtrsquos decision
referred in this document given in the year 2000 after 7 years of deliberations has paved the way
for completing the project to attain full envisaged benefits Some of the courtrsquos decisions are
essential to be quoted here (quoted in italics) to set at rest many of the distorted or incorrect
versions being presented in several of the linked Wikipedia articles on this subject
The overall plan for development ultimately conceived involves 30 major dams including Sardar
Sarovar (21 irrigation 5 hydropower and 4 multipurpose) some 135 medium dams and over three
minor dams in MP along the main stem of the river and its 41 tributaries to utilize its allocated share
of 1825 MAF before 2025 (within 45 years of the NWDT award) In addition to power generation
and irrigation within the basin water was allocated for domestic and industrial water uses and for
multipurpose trans-basin diversions to Son and Tons basins in eastern MP drought prone areas of
Saurashtra Kutch northern mainland in Gujarat and southern Rajasthan Irrigation benefits to the
extent of about 40000 to 50000 kmsup2 (of drought prone and scarcity areas) and power generation of
2600 MW were also envisaged Thus the Narmada river development is envisaged as a multi state
program for development of hydropower and irrigation dams and their associated irrigation
networks
Justice Bharucha stated that Considering the magnitude of rehabilitation involving a large
percentage of tribals loss of extensive forest area rich in biological diversity enormous
environmental cost of the project and considering the fact that the basic data on vital aspects are
still not available there could be but one conclusion that the project(s) are not ready for approval
Sardar Sarovar Project (SSP) at Navagam Subsequent to the Tribunal award and approval to the
project in 1987 by the Ministry of Water Resources with due clearances from the MoEampF
implementation of the SSP was taken up as the terminal project on the main stem of the Narmada
in Gujarat to utilize the share of allocated water to Gujarat and Rajasthan The concrete gravity dam
of 1210 m length and 163 m height above foundation with storage capacity of 77 million acre -feet
and reservoir length of 213 m extending into Gujarat Maharashtra and Madhya Pradesh is designed
to provide an annual irrigation of 18000 kmsup2 in Gujarat (covering 3360 villages of 62 talukas in 14
districts) 4260 kmsup2 in Rajasthan and hydel power generation of 1450 MW As a result of
construction of the dam over 48269 families (against 7000 families assessed in 1979 by the
Tribunal) will be affected as per the latest figures of NCA in the three States spread over 244
villages (4 fully and 240 partially - 39369 in MP in 192 villages 4163 in Maharshtra in 33 villages and
4737 in Gujarat in 19 villages) the total area affected being 37533 kmsup2 The submergence area is
broadly divided into two areas fully tribal area which covers the initial reach of about 100 or so
villages which are almost 100 tribal and hilly These include al l the 33 villages of Maharashtra (in
Nadurbar district) all 19 of Gujarat and many of the Madhya Pradesh The second part of the
submergence area is the mixed population area on the Nimad plains with a very well developed
economy that is well connected to the mainstream Considered as the largest water resources
project of India in terms of benefits some of the special features of the project are the following
Damrsquos spillway discharging capacity (307 million cusecs) is the 3rd highest in the world
With 1133 msup3s (40000 ftsup3s) capacity at the head regulator and 532 km length (458 km in
Gujarat and 74 km in Rajasthan) with 75000 km length of distribution system including field
channel the Narmada Main Canal is the largest irrigation canal in the world
The project aims at supplying 3571000 msup3day of drinking water (2900000 msup3day for domestic
consumption amp 671000 msup3day for industrial consumption) to 8215 villages amp 135 towns in Gujarat
which are presently suffering from acute shortage of water Also the project aims to provide
drinking water facilities to a population of about 1371000 in 1107 villages amp two towns in Jallore amp
Barmer districts of Rajasthan
Has the lowest ratio of submergence to area irrigated ndash being 165 of CCA against an average of
4 to 5 of other major irrigation projects
All the 6 units of River Bed Power House (RBPH) have been commissioned successfully by June 2006
and are in operation All the five units of Canal Head Power House (CHPH) have been commissioned
successfully by end of December 2004 and are in operation
The construction of the two multipurpose major projects - the Sardar Sarvoar in Gujarat and Indira
Sagar in Madya Pradesh - the two are interdependent to attain full envisaged benefits - is in progress
and substantial partial benefits have already been achieved Hence details of these two projects are
elaborated below
Sardar Sarovar Dam Gujarat partially completed (up to EL12192 m)
Largest lined canal in the World Sardar Sarovar Project
The dam has attained a height of EL12192 m ie the crest level of the spillway The gates are yet to
be erected to attain the FRL of EL 13868 m for which clearance is required from the Supreme Court
after the Grievance Redressal Committee submits its report on completion of R amp R up to that
elevation Top level of dam to be attained is EL 14650 m
The main irrigation canal has been substantially constructed for a length of 357 km Water has been
let into the canal for partial irrigation and water supply needs Further construction is in progress
Indira Sagar Project (ISP) in Madhya Pradesh at Punasa is one of the 30 major projects proposed in
the Narmada basin with the largest storage capacity in the country The project is located near
Punasa village in Khandwa District of Madhya Pradesh This Multipurpose River Valley Project
envisages construction of a concrete gravity dam 653 m long and 92 m high with gross storage
capacity of the reservoir of 1222 kmsup3 (99 MAF) and live storage of 975 kmsup3 (79MAF) to provide an
annual irrigation potential of 1690 kmsup2 and generation of 1000 MW of hydropower The project
shall also ensure supply of 006 MAF (74000000 msup3) of drinking water to rural areas in Khandwa
district In accordance with NWDT award an annual regulated flow of 812 MAF (10015 kmsup3) shall
be released to the Sardar Sarovar Project (SSP) ex-Maheshwar Project The operation of Indira Sagar
Project shall be carried out in such a way as to facilitate the regulation of Sardar Sarovar
Indira Sagar dam partially completed in Madhya Pradesh
Indira Sagar canal for irrigation
The dam and the powerhouse have been completed but storage has been restricted up to EL 260 m
under orders of the High Court Jabalpur from RampR consideration All the units of the powerhouse
have been commissioned and generation of power from the 8 units of 125 MW capacity each
commenced from Jan 2004[25]The irrigation component of the project is under a fairly advance
stage of implementation
Other completed and under construction projects Existing irrigation projects in the Narmada are the
1) Matiyari (1992) 2) Rani Avantibai Sagar (1988) 3) Barna (1978) 4) Tawa (1992-93) 5) Sukta
(1984) all in Madhya Pradesh and Karjan project in Gujarat
Projects under implementation are the 1) Bargi diversion 2) Kolar 3) Man 4) Omkareshwar
multipurpose (520 MW ndash commissioned in Nov 2007) and 5) Maheshwar (400 MW)
A large number of medium and small projects have been completed and many more are under
implementation as conceived under the overall Master Plan
Source [34]]
With the establishment of RCS all the dams and the hydroelectrical projects will get sufficient water
from the FPC1 and the West extension of FPC1 in this scenario if the levels of these projects are less
than 500 meters AMSL Problems like lsquohigh the magnitude of rehabilitation involving a large
percentage of tribals loss of extensive forest area rich in biological diversity enormous
environmental cost of the projectrsquo will not appear with RCS and all the states coming under this issue
like Madyapradesh Maharastra Gujarath and Rajastan will get more than sufficient water for
irrigation ndash industry ndash hydroelectrical projects ndash for domestic purposes
The cost will be less since (1) it involves only the creation of primary channel (2) there is no
necessity to construct the dams (3) there is no necessity to rehabilitate the people in a great way
since RCS involves very minimal area (4) no immersion of land like city and forest area in back water
in a bigger way (5) we may be creating U tubes in depressed lands in the course of primary channel
or the bi dam in a minimally depressed area but there is no back water issues in these and hence
land involved and rehabilitation are going to be less
All the water are used effectively and no water will enter the Arabian sea without being used
effectively over the land that is the more water generated beyond the storing capacity of the dam in
the rainy seasons will be effectively utilized all over the nation in the lands below 500 mts AMSL
65 FampF ndashWater dispute ndash Height of almatti dam
[Water disputes
Height of almatti dam
State gets a good deal Tribunal gives nod to raise Almatti dam height to 52425 meters
New Delhi In what could be a major relief to Karnataka the Krishna water disputes tribunal -2 has
allowed the state to build the Almatti dam up to the originally proposed height of 52425 meters
Major decisions Karnataka allowed to increase almatti dam height from 519 meters to 52425
meters Krishna waters decision Implementation Board to be set up will monitor flows Releases to
be monitored every 10 days Karnataka should release 8 to 10 tmc to AP in June and July Award to
come up for review in 2050
Water allocations Total water availability 2293tmc Andrapradesh 1001tmc Karnataka 911tmc
maharastra666tmc
This judgment has been given after 43 years of proceedings Source [37] ]
It is true by increasing the height of the dam from 519 to 52425 mts It is possible to store more
water that we can use it later
But what is the use if we are not getting sufficient water to fill the dam in one rain year As per the
calculation the total available water is 2293 TMC Andrapradesh is more benefitted from this
because there is more land available for agriculture and more population is going to be benefited If
the water generated is less then both the states are under loss The level of water (Height) in the
dam depends on the rain in the catchment area (Inflow) and the utilization in the process of
agriculture and others (out flow) If the inflow is steady throughout the year and the out flow is also
steady then both the states are going to be benefitted If we increase the height of the dam then we
may be storing more water but the back water may immerse more inhabited areas and it may
extend in the neighboring states like maharastra and other interstate issues and problems of
rehabilitation will arise
With RCS all such problems will be solved If we are creating the FPC1 at the level of 500mts AMSL
then the back water in the Almatti dam will raise only up to 500 (exactly 495) mts AMSL Any water
which is more than 500 mts AMSL will enter back in the FPC1 But the almatti dam will always be
able to relaease the water to both Karnataka and Andrapradesh what what ever amount they need
Here the total water availability 2293tmc and the allotted water to Andrapradesh 1001tmc and to
Karnataka is 911tmc Maharastra 666tmc With RCS the total water available becomes 10000 or
even more TMC and the states like Andrapradesh Karnataka and Maharastra can use 2000TMC or
even more if they want because the FPC1 will be continuously filled by the ri vers like Ganga ndash
Yamuna ndash Mahanadhi ndash Narnmada- Godhavari ndash Kaveri ndash and Krishna it iself
Thus we need not increase the height of the almatti dam lsquoin this instance onlyrsquo Increasing the height
of the dam may be the necessity in another instance that we need to discuss as such issues arises
Sources
[34] Britannica Concise Encyclopedia answerscom Wikipedia
[37] Deccan herald Mangalore Friday december31 2010 And Prajavani Kannada daily news paper
Mangalore Friday December 31 2010
Narmada River
Layout of Water Resources Development Projects in the Narmada Basin in Gujarat amp Madhya
Pradesh
Even though the tribunal award resolved the initial issue of water sharing however the height of
dam benefit sharing and the mode of settlement of project-affected people caused serious
difficulties in implementation particularly of the Sardar Sarovar dam (the terminal dam on the river)
Project-affected people agitated under the banner of the dedicated NGO - The Narmada Bachao
Andolan (NBA) The NBA followed up by Public Interest Litigation (PIL) in the Supreme Court The
NBA questioned the benefits claimed from the major projects challenged the resettlement and
rehabilitation packages for project affected people of the reservoir submergence and canal affected
zones and its implementation It also rejected the environmental impact assessments made and the
remedial actions taken by the project authorities This challenge created worldwide attention to the
major development activity planned in the valley It urged the World Bank to withdraw from the
project and the intense world wide pressure resulted in the Bank mounting an Independent Review
Mission (IRM) called the Morse Mission to review the SSP But the IRMrsquos report was neither
accepted by the Government of India or the World Bank Finally Government of India decided to
terminate further drawals from a remaining $180 million World Bank credit from the Bank with the
firm resolution that the project would be completed within the national resources
The Supreme Court has also deliberated on this issue for several years but finally upheld the Tribunal
Award and allowed the construction to proceed subject to conditions The Court introduced a
mechanism to monitor the progress of resettlement pari-passu with the raising of the height of the
dam through Grievance Redressal Authorities (GRA) in each of the party states The courtrsquos decision
referred in this document given in the year 2000 after 7 years of deliberations has paved the way
for completing the project to attain full envisaged benefits Some of the courtrsquos decisions are
essential to be quoted here (quoted in italics) to set at rest many of the distorted or incorrect
versions being presented in several of the linked Wikipedia articles on this subject
The overall plan for development ultimately conceived involves 30 major dams including Sardar
Sarovar (21 irrigation 5 hydropower and 4 multipurpose) some 135 medium dams and over three
minor dams in MP along the main stem of the river and its 41 tributaries to utilize its allocated share
of 1825 MAF before 2025 (within 45 years of the NWDT award) In addition to power generation
and irrigation within the basin water was allocated for domestic and industrial water uses and for
multipurpose trans-basin diversions to Son and Tons basins in eastern MP drought prone areas of
Saurashtra Kutch northern mainland in Gujarat and southern Rajasthan Irrigation benefits to the
extent of about 40000 to 50000 kmsup2 (of drought prone and scarcity areas) and power generation of
2600 MW were also envisaged Thus the Narmada river development is envisaged as a multi state
program for development of hydropower and irrigation dams and their associated irrigation
networks
Justice Bharucha stated that Considering the magnitude of rehabilitation involving a large
percentage of tribals loss of extensive forest area rich in biological diversity enormous
environmental cost of the project and considering the fact that the basic data on vital aspects are
still not available there could be but one conclusion that the project(s) are not ready for approval
Sardar Sarovar Project (SSP) at Navagam Subsequent to the Tribunal award and approval to the
project in 1987 by the Ministry of Water Resources with due clearances from the MoEampF
implementation of the SSP was taken up as the terminal project on the main stem of the Narmada
in Gujarat to utilize the share of allocated water to Gujarat and Rajasthan The concrete gravity dam
of 1210 m length and 163 m height above foundation with storage capacity of 77 million acre -feet
and reservoir length of 213 m extending into Gujarat Maharashtra and Madhya Pradesh is designed
to provide an annual irrigation of 18000 kmsup2 in Gujarat (covering 3360 villages of 62 talukas in 14
districts) 4260 kmsup2 in Rajasthan and hydel power generation of 1450 MW As a result of
construction of the dam over 48269 families (against 7000 families assessed in 1979 by the
Tribunal) will be affected as per the latest figures of NCA in the three States spread over 244
villages (4 fully and 240 partially - 39369 in MP in 192 villages 4163 in Maharshtra in 33 villages and
4737 in Gujarat in 19 villages) the total area affected being 37533 kmsup2 The submergence area is
broadly divided into two areas fully tribal area which covers the initial reach of about 100 or so
villages which are almost 100 tribal and hilly These include al l the 33 villages of Maharashtra (in
Nadurbar district) all 19 of Gujarat and many of the Madhya Pradesh The second part of the
submergence area is the mixed population area on the Nimad plains with a very well developed
economy that is well connected to the mainstream Considered as the largest water resources
project of India in terms of benefits some of the special features of the project are the following
Damrsquos spillway discharging capacity (307 million cusecs) is the 3rd highest in the world
With 1133 msup3s (40000 ftsup3s) capacity at the head regulator and 532 km length (458 km in
Gujarat and 74 km in Rajasthan) with 75000 km length of distribution system including field
channel the Narmada Main Canal is the largest irrigation canal in the world
The project aims at supplying 3571000 msup3day of drinking water (2900000 msup3day for domestic
consumption amp 671000 msup3day for industrial consumption) to 8215 villages amp 135 towns in Gujarat
which are presently suffering from acute shortage of water Also the project aims to provide
drinking water facilities to a population of about 1371000 in 1107 villages amp two towns in Jallore amp
Barmer districts of Rajasthan
Has the lowest ratio of submergence to area irrigated ndash being 165 of CCA against an average of
4 to 5 of other major irrigation projects
All the 6 units of River Bed Power House (RBPH) have been commissioned successfully by June 2006
and are in operation All the five units of Canal Head Power House (CHPH) have been commissioned
successfully by end of December 2004 and are in operation
The construction of the two multipurpose major projects - the Sardar Sarvoar in Gujarat and Indira
Sagar in Madya Pradesh - the two are interdependent to attain full envisaged benefits - is in progress
and substantial partial benefits have already been achieved Hence details of these two projects are
elaborated below
Sardar Sarovar Dam Gujarat partially completed (up to EL12192 m)
Largest lined canal in the World Sardar Sarovar Project
The dam has attained a height of EL12192 m ie the crest level of the spillway The gates are yet to
be erected to attain the FRL of EL 13868 m for which clearance is required from the Supreme Court
after the Grievance Redressal Committee submits its report on completion of R amp R up to that
elevation Top level of dam to be attained is EL 14650 m
The main irrigation canal has been substantially constructed for a length of 357 km Water has been
let into the canal for partial irrigation and water supply needs Further construction is in progress
Indira Sagar Project (ISP) in Madhya Pradesh at Punasa is one of the 30 major projects proposed in
the Narmada basin with the largest storage capacity in the country The project is located near
Punasa village in Khandwa District of Madhya Pradesh This Multipurpose River Valley Project
envisages construction of a concrete gravity dam 653 m long and 92 m high with gross storage
capacity of the reservoir of 1222 kmsup3 (99 MAF) and live storage of 975 kmsup3 (79MAF) to provide an
annual irrigation potential of 1690 kmsup2 and generation of 1000 MW of hydropower The project
shall also ensure supply of 006 MAF (74000000 msup3) of drinking water to rural areas in Khandwa
district In accordance with NWDT award an annual regulated flow of 812 MAF (10015 kmsup3) shall
be released to the Sardar Sarovar Project (SSP) ex-Maheshwar Project The operation of Indira Sagar
Project shall be carried out in such a way as to facilitate the regulation of Sardar Sarovar
Indira Sagar dam partially completed in Madhya Pradesh
Indira Sagar canal for irrigation
The dam and the powerhouse have been completed but storage has been restricted up to EL 260 m
under orders of the High Court Jabalpur from RampR consideration All the units of the powerhouse
have been commissioned and generation of power from the 8 units of 125 MW capacity each
commenced from Jan 2004[25]The irrigation component of the project is under a fairly advance
stage of implementation
Other completed and under construction projects Existing irrigation projects in the Narmada are the
1) Matiyari (1992) 2) Rani Avantibai Sagar (1988) 3) Barna (1978) 4) Tawa (1992-93) 5) Sukta
(1984) all in Madhya Pradesh and Karjan project in Gujarat
Projects under implementation are the 1) Bargi diversion 2) Kolar 3) Man 4) Omkareshwar
multipurpose (520 MW ndash commissioned in Nov 2007) and 5) Maheshwar (400 MW)
A large number of medium and small projects have been completed and many more are under
implementation as conceived under the overall Master Plan
Source [34]]
With the establishment of RCS all the dams and the hydroelectrical projects will get sufficient water
from the FPC1 and the West extension of FPC1 in this scenario if the levels of these projects are less
than 500 meters AMSL Problems like lsquohigh the magnitude of rehabilitation involving a large
percentage of tribals loss of extensive forest area rich in biological diversity enormous
environmental cost of the projectrsquo will not appear with RCS and all the states coming under this issue
like Madyapradesh Maharastra Gujarath and Rajastan will get more than sufficient water for
irrigation ndash industry ndash hydroelectrical projects ndash for domestic purposes
The cost will be less since (1) it involves only the creation of primary channel (2) there is no
necessity to construct the dams (3) there is no necessity to rehabilitate the people in a great way
since RCS involves very minimal area (4) no immersion of land like city and forest area in back water
in a bigger way (5) we may be creating U tubes in depressed lands in the course of primary channel
or the bi dam in a minimally depressed area but there is no back water issues in these and hence
land involved and rehabilitation are going to be less
All the water are used effectively and no water will enter the Arabian sea without being used
effectively over the land that is the more water generated beyond the storing capacity of the dam in
the rainy seasons will be effectively utilized all over the nation in the lands below 500 mts AMSL
65 FampF ndashWater dispute ndash Height of almatti dam
[Water disputes
Height of almatti dam
State gets a good deal Tribunal gives nod to raise Almatti dam height to 52425 meters
New Delhi In what could be a major relief to Karnataka the Krishna water disputes tribunal -2 has
allowed the state to build the Almatti dam up to the originally proposed height of 52425 meters
Major decisions Karnataka allowed to increase almatti dam height from 519 meters to 52425
meters Krishna waters decision Implementation Board to be set up will monitor flows Releases to
be monitored every 10 days Karnataka should release 8 to 10 tmc to AP in June and July Award to
come up for review in 2050
Water allocations Total water availability 2293tmc Andrapradesh 1001tmc Karnataka 911tmc
maharastra666tmc
This judgment has been given after 43 years of proceedings Source [37] ]
It is true by increasing the height of the dam from 519 to 52425 mts It is possible to store more
water that we can use it later
But what is the use if we are not getting sufficient water to fill the dam in one rain year As per the
calculation the total available water is 2293 TMC Andrapradesh is more benefitted from this
because there is more land available for agriculture and more population is going to be benefited If
the water generated is less then both the states are under loss The level of water (Height) in the
dam depends on the rain in the catchment area (Inflow) and the utilization in the process of
agriculture and others (out flow) If the inflow is steady throughout the year and the out flow is also
steady then both the states are going to be benefitted If we increase the height of the dam then we
may be storing more water but the back water may immerse more inhabited areas and it may
extend in the neighboring states like maharastra and other interstate issues and problems of
rehabilitation will arise
With RCS all such problems will be solved If we are creating the FPC1 at the level of 500mts AMSL
then the back water in the Almatti dam will raise only up to 500 (exactly 495) mts AMSL Any water
which is more than 500 mts AMSL will enter back in the FPC1 But the almatti dam will always be
able to relaease the water to both Karnataka and Andrapradesh what what ever amount they need
Here the total water availability 2293tmc and the allotted water to Andrapradesh 1001tmc and to
Karnataka is 911tmc Maharastra 666tmc With RCS the total water available becomes 10000 or
even more TMC and the states like Andrapradesh Karnataka and Maharastra can use 2000TMC or
even more if they want because the FPC1 will be continuously filled by the ri vers like Ganga ndash
Yamuna ndash Mahanadhi ndash Narnmada- Godhavari ndash Kaveri ndash and Krishna it iself
Thus we need not increase the height of the almatti dam lsquoin this instance onlyrsquo Increasing the height
of the dam may be the necessity in another instance that we need to discuss as such issues arises
Sources
[34] Britannica Concise Encyclopedia answerscom Wikipedia
[37] Deccan herald Mangalore Friday december31 2010 And Prajavani Kannada daily news paper
Mangalore Friday December 31 2010
of 1825 MAF before 2025 (within 45 years of the NWDT award) In addition to power generation
and irrigation within the basin water was allocated for domestic and industrial water uses and for
multipurpose trans-basin diversions to Son and Tons basins in eastern MP drought prone areas of
Saurashtra Kutch northern mainland in Gujarat and southern Rajasthan Irrigation benefits to the
extent of about 40000 to 50000 kmsup2 (of drought prone and scarcity areas) and power generation of
2600 MW were also envisaged Thus the Narmada river development is envisaged as a multi state
program for development of hydropower and irrigation dams and their associated irrigation
networks
Justice Bharucha stated that Considering the magnitude of rehabilitation involving a large
percentage of tribals loss of extensive forest area rich in biological diversity enormous
environmental cost of the project and considering the fact that the basic data on vital aspects are
still not available there could be but one conclusion that the project(s) are not ready for approval
Sardar Sarovar Project (SSP) at Navagam Subsequent to the Tribunal award and approval to the
project in 1987 by the Ministry of Water Resources with due clearances from the MoEampF
implementation of the SSP was taken up as the terminal project on the main stem of the Narmada
in Gujarat to utilize the share of allocated water to Gujarat and Rajasthan The concrete gravity dam
of 1210 m length and 163 m height above foundation with storage capacity of 77 million acre -feet
and reservoir length of 213 m extending into Gujarat Maharashtra and Madhya Pradesh is designed
to provide an annual irrigation of 18000 kmsup2 in Gujarat (covering 3360 villages of 62 talukas in 14
districts) 4260 kmsup2 in Rajasthan and hydel power generation of 1450 MW As a result of
construction of the dam over 48269 families (against 7000 families assessed in 1979 by the
Tribunal) will be affected as per the latest figures of NCA in the three States spread over 244
villages (4 fully and 240 partially - 39369 in MP in 192 villages 4163 in Maharshtra in 33 villages and
4737 in Gujarat in 19 villages) the total area affected being 37533 kmsup2 The submergence area is
broadly divided into two areas fully tribal area which covers the initial reach of about 100 or so
villages which are almost 100 tribal and hilly These include al l the 33 villages of Maharashtra (in
Nadurbar district) all 19 of Gujarat and many of the Madhya Pradesh The second part of the
submergence area is the mixed population area on the Nimad plains with a very well developed
economy that is well connected to the mainstream Considered as the largest water resources
project of India in terms of benefits some of the special features of the project are the following
Damrsquos spillway discharging capacity (307 million cusecs) is the 3rd highest in the world
With 1133 msup3s (40000 ftsup3s) capacity at the head regulator and 532 km length (458 km in
Gujarat and 74 km in Rajasthan) with 75000 km length of distribution system including field
channel the Narmada Main Canal is the largest irrigation canal in the world
The project aims at supplying 3571000 msup3day of drinking water (2900000 msup3day for domestic
consumption amp 671000 msup3day for industrial consumption) to 8215 villages amp 135 towns in Gujarat
which are presently suffering from acute shortage of water Also the project aims to provide
drinking water facilities to a population of about 1371000 in 1107 villages amp two towns in Jallore amp
Barmer districts of Rajasthan
Has the lowest ratio of submergence to area irrigated ndash being 165 of CCA against an average of
4 to 5 of other major irrigation projects
All the 6 units of River Bed Power House (RBPH) have been commissioned successfully by June 2006
and are in operation All the five units of Canal Head Power House (CHPH) have been commissioned
successfully by end of December 2004 and are in operation
The construction of the two multipurpose major projects - the Sardar Sarvoar in Gujarat and Indira
Sagar in Madya Pradesh - the two are interdependent to attain full envisaged benefits - is in progress
and substantial partial benefits have already been achieved Hence details of these two projects are
elaborated below
Sardar Sarovar Dam Gujarat partially completed (up to EL12192 m)
Largest lined canal in the World Sardar Sarovar Project
The dam has attained a height of EL12192 m ie the crest level of the spillway The gates are yet to
be erected to attain the FRL of EL 13868 m for which clearance is required from the Supreme Court
after the Grievance Redressal Committee submits its report on completion of R amp R up to that
elevation Top level of dam to be attained is EL 14650 m
The main irrigation canal has been substantially constructed for a length of 357 km Water has been
let into the canal for partial irrigation and water supply needs Further construction is in progress
Indira Sagar Project (ISP) in Madhya Pradesh at Punasa is one of the 30 major projects proposed in
the Narmada basin with the largest storage capacity in the country The project is located near
Punasa village in Khandwa District of Madhya Pradesh This Multipurpose River Valley Project
envisages construction of a concrete gravity dam 653 m long and 92 m high with gross storage
capacity of the reservoir of 1222 kmsup3 (99 MAF) and live storage of 975 kmsup3 (79MAF) to provide an
annual irrigation potential of 1690 kmsup2 and generation of 1000 MW of hydropower The project
shall also ensure supply of 006 MAF (74000000 msup3) of drinking water to rural areas in Khandwa
district In accordance with NWDT award an annual regulated flow of 812 MAF (10015 kmsup3) shall
be released to the Sardar Sarovar Project (SSP) ex-Maheshwar Project The operation of Indira Sagar
Project shall be carried out in such a way as to facilitate the regulation of Sardar Sarovar
Indira Sagar dam partially completed in Madhya Pradesh
Indira Sagar canal for irrigation
The dam and the powerhouse have been completed but storage has been restricted up to EL 260 m
under orders of the High Court Jabalpur from RampR consideration All the units of the powerhouse
have been commissioned and generation of power from the 8 units of 125 MW capacity each
commenced from Jan 2004[25]The irrigation component of the project is under a fairly advance
stage of implementation
Other completed and under construction projects Existing irrigation projects in the Narmada are the
1) Matiyari (1992) 2) Rani Avantibai Sagar (1988) 3) Barna (1978) 4) Tawa (1992-93) 5) Sukta
(1984) all in Madhya Pradesh and Karjan project in Gujarat
Projects under implementation are the 1) Bargi diversion 2) Kolar 3) Man 4) Omkareshwar
multipurpose (520 MW ndash commissioned in Nov 2007) and 5) Maheshwar (400 MW)
A large number of medium and small projects have been completed and many more are under
implementation as conceived under the overall Master Plan
Source [34]]
With the establishment of RCS all the dams and the hydroelectrical projects will get sufficient water
from the FPC1 and the West extension of FPC1 in this scenario if the levels of these projects are less
than 500 meters AMSL Problems like lsquohigh the magnitude of rehabilitation involving a large
percentage of tribals loss of extensive forest area rich in biological diversity enormous
environmental cost of the projectrsquo will not appear with RCS and all the states coming under this issue
like Madyapradesh Maharastra Gujarath and Rajastan will get more than sufficient water for
irrigation ndash industry ndash hydroelectrical projects ndash for domestic purposes
The cost will be less since (1) it involves only the creation of primary channel (2) there is no
necessity to construct the dams (3) there is no necessity to rehabilitate the people in a great way
since RCS involves very minimal area (4) no immersion of land like city and forest area in back water
in a bigger way (5) we may be creating U tubes in depressed lands in the course of primary channel
or the bi dam in a minimally depressed area but there is no back water issues in these and hence
land involved and rehabilitation are going to be less
All the water are used effectively and no water will enter the Arabian sea without being used
effectively over the land that is the more water generated beyond the storing capacity of the dam in
the rainy seasons will be effectively utilized all over the nation in the lands below 500 mts AMSL
65 FampF ndashWater dispute ndash Height of almatti dam
[Water disputes
Height of almatti dam
State gets a good deal Tribunal gives nod to raise Almatti dam height to 52425 meters
New Delhi In what could be a major relief to Karnataka the Krishna water disputes tribunal -2 has
allowed the state to build the Almatti dam up to the originally proposed height of 52425 meters
Major decisions Karnataka allowed to increase almatti dam height from 519 meters to 52425
meters Krishna waters decision Implementation Board to be set up will monitor flows Releases to
be monitored every 10 days Karnataka should release 8 to 10 tmc to AP in June and July Award to
come up for review in 2050
Water allocations Total water availability 2293tmc Andrapradesh 1001tmc Karnataka 911tmc
maharastra666tmc
This judgment has been given after 43 years of proceedings Source [37] ]
It is true by increasing the height of the dam from 519 to 52425 mts It is possible to store more
water that we can use it later
But what is the use if we are not getting sufficient water to fill the dam in one rain year As per the
calculation the total available water is 2293 TMC Andrapradesh is more benefitted from this
because there is more land available for agriculture and more population is going to be benefited If
the water generated is less then both the states are under loss The level of water (Height) in the
dam depends on the rain in the catchment area (Inflow) and the utilization in the process of
agriculture and others (out flow) If the inflow is steady throughout the year and the out flow is also
steady then both the states are going to be benefitted If we increase the height of the dam then we
may be storing more water but the back water may immerse more inhabited areas and it may
extend in the neighboring states like maharastra and other interstate issues and problems of
rehabilitation will arise
With RCS all such problems will be solved If we are creating the FPC1 at the level of 500mts AMSL
then the back water in the Almatti dam will raise only up to 500 (exactly 495) mts AMSL Any water
which is more than 500 mts AMSL will enter back in the FPC1 But the almatti dam will always be
able to relaease the water to both Karnataka and Andrapradesh what what ever amount they need
Here the total water availability 2293tmc and the allotted water to Andrapradesh 1001tmc and to
Karnataka is 911tmc Maharastra 666tmc With RCS the total water available becomes 10000 or
even more TMC and the states like Andrapradesh Karnataka and Maharastra can use 2000TMC or
even more if they want because the FPC1 will be continuously filled by the ri vers like Ganga ndash
Yamuna ndash Mahanadhi ndash Narnmada- Godhavari ndash Kaveri ndash and Krishna it iself
Thus we need not increase the height of the almatti dam lsquoin this instance onlyrsquo Increasing the height
of the dam may be the necessity in another instance that we need to discuss as such issues arises
Sources
[34] Britannica Concise Encyclopedia answerscom Wikipedia
[37] Deccan herald Mangalore Friday december31 2010 And Prajavani Kannada daily news paper
Mangalore Friday December 31 2010
Has the lowest ratio of submergence to area irrigated ndash being 165 of CCA against an average of
4 to 5 of other major irrigation projects
All the 6 units of River Bed Power House (RBPH) have been commissioned successfully by June 2006
and are in operation All the five units of Canal Head Power House (CHPH) have been commissioned
successfully by end of December 2004 and are in operation
The construction of the two multipurpose major projects - the Sardar Sarvoar in Gujarat and Indira
Sagar in Madya Pradesh - the two are interdependent to attain full envisaged benefits - is in progress
and substantial partial benefits have already been achieved Hence details of these two projects are
elaborated below
Sardar Sarovar Dam Gujarat partially completed (up to EL12192 m)
Largest lined canal in the World Sardar Sarovar Project
The dam has attained a height of EL12192 m ie the crest level of the spillway The gates are yet to
be erected to attain the FRL of EL 13868 m for which clearance is required from the Supreme Court
after the Grievance Redressal Committee submits its report on completion of R amp R up to that
elevation Top level of dam to be attained is EL 14650 m
The main irrigation canal has been substantially constructed for a length of 357 km Water has been
let into the canal for partial irrigation and water supply needs Further construction is in progress
Indira Sagar Project (ISP) in Madhya Pradesh at Punasa is one of the 30 major projects proposed in
the Narmada basin with the largest storage capacity in the country The project is located near
Punasa village in Khandwa District of Madhya Pradesh This Multipurpose River Valley Project
envisages construction of a concrete gravity dam 653 m long and 92 m high with gross storage
capacity of the reservoir of 1222 kmsup3 (99 MAF) and live storage of 975 kmsup3 (79MAF) to provide an
annual irrigation potential of 1690 kmsup2 and generation of 1000 MW of hydropower The project
shall also ensure supply of 006 MAF (74000000 msup3) of drinking water to rural areas in Khandwa
district In accordance with NWDT award an annual regulated flow of 812 MAF (10015 kmsup3) shall
be released to the Sardar Sarovar Project (SSP) ex-Maheshwar Project The operation of Indira Sagar
Project shall be carried out in such a way as to facilitate the regulation of Sardar Sarovar
Indira Sagar dam partially completed in Madhya Pradesh
Indira Sagar canal for irrigation
The dam and the powerhouse have been completed but storage has been restricted up to EL 260 m
under orders of the High Court Jabalpur from RampR consideration All the units of the powerhouse
have been commissioned and generation of power from the 8 units of 125 MW capacity each
commenced from Jan 2004[25]The irrigation component of the project is under a fairly advance
stage of implementation
Other completed and under construction projects Existing irrigation projects in the Narmada are the
1) Matiyari (1992) 2) Rani Avantibai Sagar (1988) 3) Barna (1978) 4) Tawa (1992-93) 5) Sukta
(1984) all in Madhya Pradesh and Karjan project in Gujarat
Projects under implementation are the 1) Bargi diversion 2) Kolar 3) Man 4) Omkareshwar
multipurpose (520 MW ndash commissioned in Nov 2007) and 5) Maheshwar (400 MW)
A large number of medium and small projects have been completed and many more are under
implementation as conceived under the overall Master Plan
Source [34]]
With the establishment of RCS all the dams and the hydroelectrical projects will get sufficient water
from the FPC1 and the West extension of FPC1 in this scenario if the levels of these projects are less
than 500 meters AMSL Problems like lsquohigh the magnitude of rehabilitation involving a large
percentage of tribals loss of extensive forest area rich in biological diversity enormous
environmental cost of the projectrsquo will not appear with RCS and all the states coming under this issue
like Madyapradesh Maharastra Gujarath and Rajastan will get more than sufficient water for
irrigation ndash industry ndash hydroelectrical projects ndash for domestic purposes
The cost will be less since (1) it involves only the creation of primary channel (2) there is no
necessity to construct the dams (3) there is no necessity to rehabilitate the people in a great way
since RCS involves very minimal area (4) no immersion of land like city and forest area in back water
in a bigger way (5) we may be creating U tubes in depressed lands in the course of primary channel
or the bi dam in a minimally depressed area but there is no back water issues in these and hence
land involved and rehabilitation are going to be less
All the water are used effectively and no water will enter the Arabian sea without being used
effectively over the land that is the more water generated beyond the storing capacity of the dam in
the rainy seasons will be effectively utilized all over the nation in the lands below 500 mts AMSL
65 FampF ndashWater dispute ndash Height of almatti dam
[Water disputes
Height of almatti dam
State gets a good deal Tribunal gives nod to raise Almatti dam height to 52425 meters
New Delhi In what could be a major relief to Karnataka the Krishna water disputes tribunal -2 has
allowed the state to build the Almatti dam up to the originally proposed height of 52425 meters
Major decisions Karnataka allowed to increase almatti dam height from 519 meters to 52425
meters Krishna waters decision Implementation Board to be set up will monitor flows Releases to
be monitored every 10 days Karnataka should release 8 to 10 tmc to AP in June and July Award to
come up for review in 2050
Water allocations Total water availability 2293tmc Andrapradesh 1001tmc Karnataka 911tmc
maharastra666tmc
This judgment has been given after 43 years of proceedings Source [37] ]
It is true by increasing the height of the dam from 519 to 52425 mts It is possible to store more
water that we can use it later
But what is the use if we are not getting sufficient water to fill the dam in one rain year As per the
calculation the total available water is 2293 TMC Andrapradesh is more benefitted from this
because there is more land available for agriculture and more population is going to be benefited If
the water generated is less then both the states are under loss The level of water (Height) in the
dam depends on the rain in the catchment area (Inflow) and the utilization in the process of
agriculture and others (out flow) If the inflow is steady throughout the year and the out flow is also
steady then both the states are going to be benefitted If we increase the height of the dam then we
may be storing more water but the back water may immerse more inhabited areas and it may
extend in the neighboring states like maharastra and other interstate issues and problems of
rehabilitation will arise
With RCS all such problems will be solved If we are creating the FPC1 at the level of 500mts AMSL
then the back water in the Almatti dam will raise only up to 500 (exactly 495) mts AMSL Any water
which is more than 500 mts AMSL will enter back in the FPC1 But the almatti dam will always be
able to relaease the water to both Karnataka and Andrapradesh what what ever amount they need
Here the total water availability 2293tmc and the allotted water to Andrapradesh 1001tmc and to
Karnataka is 911tmc Maharastra 666tmc With RCS the total water available becomes 10000 or
even more TMC and the states like Andrapradesh Karnataka and Maharastra can use 2000TMC or
even more if they want because the FPC1 will be continuously filled by the ri vers like Ganga ndash
Yamuna ndash Mahanadhi ndash Narnmada- Godhavari ndash Kaveri ndash and Krishna it iself
Thus we need not increase the height of the almatti dam lsquoin this instance onlyrsquo Increasing the height
of the dam may be the necessity in another instance that we need to discuss as such issues arises
Sources
[34] Britannica Concise Encyclopedia answerscom Wikipedia
[37] Deccan herald Mangalore Friday december31 2010 And Prajavani Kannada daily news paper
Mangalore Friday December 31 2010
The main irrigation canal has been substantially constructed for a length of 357 km Water has been
let into the canal for partial irrigation and water supply needs Further construction is in progress
Indira Sagar Project (ISP) in Madhya Pradesh at Punasa is one of the 30 major projects proposed in
the Narmada basin with the largest storage capacity in the country The project is located near
Punasa village in Khandwa District of Madhya Pradesh This Multipurpose River Valley Project
envisages construction of a concrete gravity dam 653 m long and 92 m high with gross storage
capacity of the reservoir of 1222 kmsup3 (99 MAF) and live storage of 975 kmsup3 (79MAF) to provide an
annual irrigation potential of 1690 kmsup2 and generation of 1000 MW of hydropower The project
shall also ensure supply of 006 MAF (74000000 msup3) of drinking water to rural areas in Khandwa
district In accordance with NWDT award an annual regulated flow of 812 MAF (10015 kmsup3) shall
be released to the Sardar Sarovar Project (SSP) ex-Maheshwar Project The operation of Indira Sagar
Project shall be carried out in such a way as to facilitate the regulation of Sardar Sarovar
Indira Sagar dam partially completed in Madhya Pradesh
Indira Sagar canal for irrigation
The dam and the powerhouse have been completed but storage has been restricted up to EL 260 m
under orders of the High Court Jabalpur from RampR consideration All the units of the powerhouse
have been commissioned and generation of power from the 8 units of 125 MW capacity each
commenced from Jan 2004[25]The irrigation component of the project is under a fairly advance
stage of implementation
Other completed and under construction projects Existing irrigation projects in the Narmada are the
1) Matiyari (1992) 2) Rani Avantibai Sagar (1988) 3) Barna (1978) 4) Tawa (1992-93) 5) Sukta
(1984) all in Madhya Pradesh and Karjan project in Gujarat
Projects under implementation are the 1) Bargi diversion 2) Kolar 3) Man 4) Omkareshwar
multipurpose (520 MW ndash commissioned in Nov 2007) and 5) Maheshwar (400 MW)
A large number of medium and small projects have been completed and many more are under
implementation as conceived under the overall Master Plan
Source [34]]
With the establishment of RCS all the dams and the hydroelectrical projects will get sufficient water
from the FPC1 and the West extension of FPC1 in this scenario if the levels of these projects are less
than 500 meters AMSL Problems like lsquohigh the magnitude of rehabilitation involving a large
percentage of tribals loss of extensive forest area rich in biological diversity enormous
environmental cost of the projectrsquo will not appear with RCS and all the states coming under this issue
like Madyapradesh Maharastra Gujarath and Rajastan will get more than sufficient water for
irrigation ndash industry ndash hydroelectrical projects ndash for domestic purposes
The cost will be less since (1) it involves only the creation of primary channel (2) there is no
necessity to construct the dams (3) there is no necessity to rehabilitate the people in a great way
since RCS involves very minimal area (4) no immersion of land like city and forest area in back water
in a bigger way (5) we may be creating U tubes in depressed lands in the course of primary channel
or the bi dam in a minimally depressed area but there is no back water issues in these and hence
land involved and rehabilitation are going to be less
All the water are used effectively and no water will enter the Arabian sea without being used
effectively over the land that is the more water generated beyond the storing capacity of the dam in
the rainy seasons will be effectively utilized all over the nation in the lands below 500 mts AMSL
65 FampF ndashWater dispute ndash Height of almatti dam
[Water disputes
Height of almatti dam
State gets a good deal Tribunal gives nod to raise Almatti dam height to 52425 meters
New Delhi In what could be a major relief to Karnataka the Krishna water disputes tribunal -2 has
allowed the state to build the Almatti dam up to the originally proposed height of 52425 meters
Major decisions Karnataka allowed to increase almatti dam height from 519 meters to 52425
meters Krishna waters decision Implementation Board to be set up will monitor flows Releases to
be monitored every 10 days Karnataka should release 8 to 10 tmc to AP in June and July Award to
come up for review in 2050
Water allocations Total water availability 2293tmc Andrapradesh 1001tmc Karnataka 911tmc
maharastra666tmc
This judgment has been given after 43 years of proceedings Source [37] ]
It is true by increasing the height of the dam from 519 to 52425 mts It is possible to store more
water that we can use it later
But what is the use if we are not getting sufficient water to fill the dam in one rain year As per the
calculation the total available water is 2293 TMC Andrapradesh is more benefitted from this
because there is more land available for agriculture and more population is going to be benefited If
the water generated is less then both the states are under loss The level of water (Height) in the
dam depends on the rain in the catchment area (Inflow) and the utilization in the process of
agriculture and others (out flow) If the inflow is steady throughout the year and the out flow is also
steady then both the states are going to be benefitted If we increase the height of the dam then we
may be storing more water but the back water may immerse more inhabited areas and it may
extend in the neighboring states like maharastra and other interstate issues and problems of
rehabilitation will arise
With RCS all such problems will be solved If we are creating the FPC1 at the level of 500mts AMSL
then the back water in the Almatti dam will raise only up to 500 (exactly 495) mts AMSL Any water
which is more than 500 mts AMSL will enter back in the FPC1 But the almatti dam will always be
able to relaease the water to both Karnataka and Andrapradesh what what ever amount they need
Here the total water availability 2293tmc and the allotted water to Andrapradesh 1001tmc and to
Karnataka is 911tmc Maharastra 666tmc With RCS the total water available becomes 10000 or
even more TMC and the states like Andrapradesh Karnataka and Maharastra can use 2000TMC or
even more if they want because the FPC1 will be continuously filled by the ri vers like Ganga ndash
Yamuna ndash Mahanadhi ndash Narnmada- Godhavari ndash Kaveri ndash and Krishna it iself
Thus we need not increase the height of the almatti dam lsquoin this instance onlyrsquo Increasing the height
of the dam may be the necessity in another instance that we need to discuss as such issues arises
Sources
[34] Britannica Concise Encyclopedia answerscom Wikipedia
[37] Deccan herald Mangalore Friday december31 2010 And Prajavani Kannada daily news paper
Mangalore Friday December 31 2010
commenced from Jan 2004[25]The irrigation component of the project is under a fairly advance
stage of implementation
Other completed and under construction projects Existing irrigation projects in the Narmada are the
1) Matiyari (1992) 2) Rani Avantibai Sagar (1988) 3) Barna (1978) 4) Tawa (1992-93) 5) Sukta
(1984) all in Madhya Pradesh and Karjan project in Gujarat
Projects under implementation are the 1) Bargi diversion 2) Kolar 3) Man 4) Omkareshwar
multipurpose (520 MW ndash commissioned in Nov 2007) and 5) Maheshwar (400 MW)
A large number of medium and small projects have been completed and many more are under
implementation as conceived under the overall Master Plan
Source [34]]
With the establishment of RCS all the dams and the hydroelectrical projects will get sufficient water
from the FPC1 and the West extension of FPC1 in this scenario if the levels of these projects are less
than 500 meters AMSL Problems like lsquohigh the magnitude of rehabilitation involving a large
percentage of tribals loss of extensive forest area rich in biological diversity enormous
environmental cost of the projectrsquo will not appear with RCS and all the states coming under this issue
like Madyapradesh Maharastra Gujarath and Rajastan will get more than sufficient water for
irrigation ndash industry ndash hydroelectrical projects ndash for domestic purposes
The cost will be less since (1) it involves only the creation of primary channel (2) there is no
necessity to construct the dams (3) there is no necessity to rehabilitate the people in a great way
since RCS involves very minimal area (4) no immersion of land like city and forest area in back water
in a bigger way (5) we may be creating U tubes in depressed lands in the course of primary channel
or the bi dam in a minimally depressed area but there is no back water issues in these and hence
land involved and rehabilitation are going to be less
All the water are used effectively and no water will enter the Arabian sea without being used
effectively over the land that is the more water generated beyond the storing capacity of the dam in
the rainy seasons will be effectively utilized all over the nation in the lands below 500 mts AMSL
65 FampF ndashWater dispute ndash Height of almatti dam
[Water disputes
Height of almatti dam
State gets a good deal Tribunal gives nod to raise Almatti dam height to 52425 meters
New Delhi In what could be a major relief to Karnataka the Krishna water disputes tribunal -2 has
allowed the state to build the Almatti dam up to the originally proposed height of 52425 meters
Major decisions Karnataka allowed to increase almatti dam height from 519 meters to 52425
meters Krishna waters decision Implementation Board to be set up will monitor flows Releases to
be monitored every 10 days Karnataka should release 8 to 10 tmc to AP in June and July Award to
come up for review in 2050
Water allocations Total water availability 2293tmc Andrapradesh 1001tmc Karnataka 911tmc
maharastra666tmc
This judgment has been given after 43 years of proceedings Source [37] ]
It is true by increasing the height of the dam from 519 to 52425 mts It is possible to store more
water that we can use it later
But what is the use if we are not getting sufficient water to fill the dam in one rain year As per the
calculation the total available water is 2293 TMC Andrapradesh is more benefitted from this
because there is more land available for agriculture and more population is going to be benefited If
the water generated is less then both the states are under loss The level of water (Height) in the
dam depends on the rain in the catchment area (Inflow) and the utilization in the process of
agriculture and others (out flow) If the inflow is steady throughout the year and the out flow is also
steady then both the states are going to be benefitted If we increase the height of the dam then we
may be storing more water but the back water may immerse more inhabited areas and it may
extend in the neighboring states like maharastra and other interstate issues and problems of
rehabilitation will arise
With RCS all such problems will be solved If we are creating the FPC1 at the level of 500mts AMSL
then the back water in the Almatti dam will raise only up to 500 (exactly 495) mts AMSL Any water
which is more than 500 mts AMSL will enter back in the FPC1 But the almatti dam will always be
able to relaease the water to both Karnataka and Andrapradesh what what ever amount they need
Here the total water availability 2293tmc and the allotted water to Andrapradesh 1001tmc and to
Karnataka is 911tmc Maharastra 666tmc With RCS the total water available becomes 10000 or
even more TMC and the states like Andrapradesh Karnataka and Maharastra can use 2000TMC or
even more if they want because the FPC1 will be continuously filled by the ri vers like Ganga ndash
Yamuna ndash Mahanadhi ndash Narnmada- Godhavari ndash Kaveri ndash and Krishna it iself
Thus we need not increase the height of the almatti dam lsquoin this instance onlyrsquo Increasing the height
of the dam may be the necessity in another instance that we need to discuss as such issues arises
Sources
[34] Britannica Concise Encyclopedia answerscom Wikipedia
[37] Deccan herald Mangalore Friday december31 2010 And Prajavani Kannada daily news paper
Mangalore Friday December 31 2010
be monitored every 10 days Karnataka should release 8 to 10 tmc to AP in June and July Award to
come up for review in 2050
Water allocations Total water availability 2293tmc Andrapradesh 1001tmc Karnataka 911tmc
maharastra666tmc
This judgment has been given after 43 years of proceedings Source [37] ]
It is true by increasing the height of the dam from 519 to 52425 mts It is possible to store more
water that we can use it later
But what is the use if we are not getting sufficient water to fill the dam in one rain year As per the
calculation the total available water is 2293 TMC Andrapradesh is more benefitted from this
because there is more land available for agriculture and more population is going to be benefited If
the water generated is less then both the states are under loss The level of water (Height) in the
dam depends on the rain in the catchment area (Inflow) and the utilization in the process of
agriculture and others (out flow) If the inflow is steady throughout the year and the out flow is also
steady then both the states are going to be benefitted If we increase the height of the dam then we
may be storing more water but the back water may immerse more inhabited areas and it may
extend in the neighboring states like maharastra and other interstate issues and problems of
rehabilitation will arise
With RCS all such problems will be solved If we are creating the FPC1 at the level of 500mts AMSL
then the back water in the Almatti dam will raise only up to 500 (exactly 495) mts AMSL Any water
which is more than 500 mts AMSL will enter back in the FPC1 But the almatti dam will always be
able to relaease the water to both Karnataka and Andrapradesh what what ever amount they need
Here the total water availability 2293tmc and the allotted water to Andrapradesh 1001tmc and to
Karnataka is 911tmc Maharastra 666tmc With RCS the total water available becomes 10000 or
even more TMC and the states like Andrapradesh Karnataka and Maharastra can use 2000TMC or
even more if they want because the FPC1 will be continuously filled by the ri vers like Ganga ndash
Yamuna ndash Mahanadhi ndash Narnmada- Godhavari ndash Kaveri ndash and Krishna it iself
Thus we need not increase the height of the almatti dam lsquoin this instance onlyrsquo Increasing the height
of the dam may be the necessity in another instance that we need to discuss as such issues arises
Sources
[34] Britannica Concise Encyclopedia answerscom Wikipedia
[37] Deccan herald Mangalore Friday december31 2010 And Prajavani Kannada daily news paper
Mangalore Friday December 31 2010