22
Potential mitigation impact of good practice policies 1 Side event at SB42, Bonn 5 June 2015 Hanna Fekete, NewClimate Institute

Potential mitigation impact of good practice policies

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Potential mitigation impact of good practice policies

1

Potential mitigation impact of good practice policies

Side event at SB42, Bonn

5 June 2015

Hanna Fekete, NewClimate Institute

Page 2: Potential mitigation impact of good practice policies

2

Approach - good practice policies

How much could global GHG emissions be reduced if all countries implemented the best policies that are already applied by some countries?

Steps:

Identify good practice policy areas

Define indicators for the quantification of the policies

Determine impact on emissions per country and globally

Where possible - Compare results to scenarios compatible with 2°

Illustration of results of good practice asSectoral indicators

Absolute economy wide emissions

Page 3: Potential mitigation impact of good practice policies

4

Exemplary results – Fuel efficiency of light duty vehicles (LDVs)

Relatively homogeneous efficiency of LDVs across countries today, some deviation in future

Good practice improves efficiency especially after 2020

Current policies Good practice policiesPBL

New Climate

05

101520253035404550

2005

2010

2015

2020

2025

2030

Dist

ance

trav

elle

d pe

r fue

l use

[k

m/l

]

05

101520253035404550

2005

2010

2015

2020

2025

2030

Dist

ance

trav

elle

d pe

r fue

l use

[k

m/l

]

05

101520253035404550

2005

2010

2015

2020

2025

2030

WorldChinaUSIndiaBrazilRussiaJapanRest of world

05

101520253035404550

2005

2010

2015

2020

2025

2030WorldChinaUSIndiaBrazilRussiaJapanRest of world

Page 4: Potential mitigation impact of good practice policies

5

Exemplary results – share of renewable electricity

Good practice accelerates renewable energy deployment

2° compatible: 35% in 2030 (median of all scenarios, IPCC 2014)

Page 5: Potential mitigation impact of good practice policies

6

Exemplary results – emission intensity of the electricity sector

Good practice strengthens decarbonisation trend

2° compatible: 0.16 to 0.35 kg/kWh in 2030 (IPCC 2014)

Current policies Good practice policiesPBL

New Climate

0.00.10.20.30.40.50.60.70.80.91.0

2005

2010

2015

2020

2025

2030Emis

sion

inte

nsity

of e

lect

ricity

ge

nera

tion

[kgC

O2e

/kW

h]

0.00.10.20.30.40.50.60.70.80.91.0

2005

2010

2015

2020

2025

2030

Emis

sion

inte

nsity

of e

lect

ricity

ge

nera

tion

[kgC

O2e

/kW

h]

0.00.10.20.30.40.50.60.70.80.91.0

2005

2010

2015

2020

2025

2030

World

China

US

India

Brazil

Japan

Rest of world

0.00.10.20.30.40.50.60.70.80.91.0

2005

2010

2015

2020

2025

2030WorldChinaUSIndiaBrazilRussiaJapanRest of world

Page 6: Potential mitigation impact of good practice policies

7

Covered - Power supply Covered - Industry (energy related)

Covered - Transport (cars only) Covered - F-gases

Covered - Oil & gas production Covered - Buildings

Covered - LULUCF Uncovered - total rest

From sectoral indicators to global emissions

Coverage NewClimate Institute

Covered - Energy Supply Covered - Industry

Covered - Transport Covered - Buildings

Covered - AFOLU Uncovered - AFOLU

Uncovered - Transport Uncovered - Waste

Uncovered - Energy Supply Uncovered - Buildings

Uncovered - Industry Uncovered - Bunkers

Uncovered - Other

Coverage PBL

Page 7: Potential mitigation impact of good practice policies

8

Exemplary results - global

Global emissions

0

10,000

20,000

30,000

40,000

50,000

60,000

1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030

Em

issi

ons

[MtC

O2

e/a]

GHG emissons, excluding land use

History

I mplemented policies

Good practice policies (limited coverage)

Land use emissions

History

Good practce policies

Page 8: Potential mitigation impact of good practice policies

9

Remainingemissions of areas with good practice policies

Emissions of areas with no additional policies

Exemplary results - global

Global emissions

0

10,000

20,000

30,000

40,000

50,000

60,000

1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030

Em

issi

ons

[MtC

O2

e/a]

GHG emissons, excluding land use

History

I mplemented policies

Good practice policies (limited coverage)

Land use emissions

History

Good practce policies

Page 9: Potential mitigation impact of good practice policies

10

Exemplary results - global

Total emissions and reductions by policy area – including LULUCF

Source: Own elaboration. Range of 2° pathways taken from UNEP Emissions Gap Report 2014

30

35

40

45

50

55

60

65

1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030

LULUCF

Promotion of electric vehicles

Efficiency standards for light duty vehicles

Efficiency standards for the building envelope

Reduction of f-gases

Promotion of energy efficiency in industry

Targets for methane reduction from oil and gas production

Reducing electricity demand from industry and buildings

Support for renewable electricity

Current policies (incl. LULUCF)

Range of 2°pathways

30

35

40

45

50

55

60

65

1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030

GtC

O2e

/a

Page 10: Potential mitigation impact of good practice policies

11

Conclusions

Good practice policies in the nine analysed areas move emission trajectories significantly towards 2°

Policies in areas not analysed (35% of emissions) can lead to additional reductions

Fast implementation and broad geographical coverage are essential

Sectoral indicators valuable for analyzing direct impacts of policies

Page 11: Potential mitigation impact of good practice policies

12

Thank you for your attention

Contacts:

Hanna Fekete, NewClimate Institute ([email protected])

Mark Roelfsema, PBL Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency ([email protected])

Page 12: Potential mitigation impact of good practice policies

13

Back up slides

Page 13: Potential mitigation impact of good practice policies

14

Exemplary results – oil and gas production

Current policies Good practice policiesPBL

New Climate

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

2005

2010

2015

2020

2025

2030

ktCO

2e/to

e of

fuel

pro

duce

d

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

2005

2010

2015

2020

2025

2030

ktCO

2e/to

e of

fuel

pro

duce

d

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

2005

2010

2015

2020

2025

2030

World

China

US

India

Brazil

Russia

Japan

Rest of world

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

2005

2010

2015

2020

2025

2030

World

China

US

India

Brazil

Russia

Japan

Rest of world

Good practice changes trend in emissions intensity

Current policies Good practice policies

Page 14: Potential mitigation impact of good practice policies

15

Exemplary results - China

-1,000

1,000

3,000

5,000

7,000

9,000

11,000

13,000

15,000

17,000

19,000

1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030

Em

issi

ons

[MtC

O2e p

er

year]

Remaining emissions of areas with good practice policies

Emissions of areas with no additional policies

GHG emissons, excluding land use

History

Pledge

I mplemented policies

Good practice policies (limited coverage)

Land use emissions

History

I mplemented policies

Page 15: Potential mitigation impact of good practice policies

16

Exemplary results - USA

-2,000

0

2,000

4,000

6,000

8,000

10,000

1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030

Em

issi

ons

[MtC

O2e p

er

year]

Remaining emissions of areas with good practice policies

Emissions of areas with no additional policies

GHG emissons, excluding land use

History

Pledge

I mplemented policies

Good practice policies (limited coverage)

Good practice policies (full coverage)

Land use emissions

History

I mplemented policies

Page 16: Potential mitigation impact of good practice policies

17

Exemplary results - India

-500

500

1,500

2,500

3,500

4,500

5,500

1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030

Em

issi

ons

[MtC

O2e p

er

year]

GHG emissons, excluding land use

History

Pledge

I mplemented policies

Good practice policies (limited coverage)

Land use emissions

History

I mplemented policies

Remaining emissions of areas with good practice policies

Emissions of areas with no additional policies

Page 17: Potential mitigation impact of good practice policies

18

Exemplary results – Brazil

0

500

1,000

1,500

2,000

2,500

3,000

1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030

Em

issi

ons

[MtC

O2e p

er

year]

Good practice policiesprojections, min/max

GHG emissons, excluding land use

History

Pledge

I mplemented policies

Good practice policies (limited coverage)

Good practice policies (full coverage)

Land use emissions

History

I mplemented policies

Remaining emissions of areas with good practice policies

Emissions of areas with no additional policies

Page 18: Potential mitigation impact of good practice policies

19

Exemplary results - Japan

-200

0

200

400

600

800

1,000

1,200

1,400

1,600

1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030

Em

issi

ons

[MtC

O2e p

er

year]

Remaining emissions of areas with good practice policies

Emissions of areas with no additional policies

GHG emissons, excluding land use

History

Pledge

I mplemented policies

Good practice policies (limited coverage)

Land use emissions

History

I mplemented policies

Page 19: Potential mitigation impact of good practice policies

20

Exemplary results - Russia

-1,000

-500

0

500

1,000

1,500

2,000

2,500

3,000

3,500

1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030

Em

issi

ons

[MtC

O2e p

er

year]

Implemented policy projections

LULUCF min

Series3

Only LULUCF

GHG emissons, excluding land use

History

Pledge

I mplemented policies

Good practice policies (limited coverage)

Land use emissions

History

I mplemented policies

Remaining emissions of areas with good practice policies

Emissions of areas with no additional policies

Page 20: Potential mitigation impact of good practice policies

21

Exemplary results – Rest of World

-2,000

3,000

8,000

13,000

18,000

23,000

28,000

1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030

Remainingemissions of areas with good practice policies

Emissions of areas with no additional policies

GHG emissons, excluding land use

History

Pledge

I mplemented policies

Good practice policies (limited coverage)

Page 21: Potential mitigation impact of good practice policies

22

Approach – indicators per policy area 1/2

Page 22: Potential mitigation impact of good practice policies

23

Approach – indicators per policy area 1/2