Upload
7391456
View
541
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Contents
DEVELOPMENT OF SUSTAINABLE BIOBASED COMPOSITE PRODUCTS FROM AGRICULTURAL WASTE
Sudhakar Muniyasamy and Sunshine BlouwCSIR-MSM, Nonwoven and Composite Research Group
Port Elizabeth 6001E-mail: [email protected]
Industrial Efficiency Conference 2015, 21&22 July 2015, ICC-Durban
2
INTRODUCTION : World Plastics Production, Consumption and Demands and its related Environmental problems
SUSTAINABLE BIO-COMPOSITES FROM RENEWABLE RESOURCES: Opportunities and Challenges in the Next Generation of Materials, Processes and Products
OBJECTIVES : In Support of Bioeconomy Strategy
RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENTS: Value Added Industrial Biobased Composite Materials and Products from Agricultural biomass
SUMMARY
WAY FORWARD
CONTENTS
3
World Plastics Production and their Consumptions
Note: Based on preliminary estimates by European Market Research & Statistics Working group. Includes thermoplastics, thermosets, adhesives, coatings and dispersions. Fibers are not included
Source: Plastics Europe 2013, WG Market Research & Statistics
Plastics are a global success story 1950: 1.7 Mt 1976: 47 Mt 1989: 100 Mt 2002: 204 Mt 2007: 257 Mt 2011: 279 Mt 2012: 288 Mt 2013: 299 Mt
4
World Production of Plastic Materials by Regions in 2013
China Ranks First Europe Ranks Second
Source : PlasticsEurope 2014
Does not include other plastics (thermosets, adhesives, coatings and sealants) nor PP-fibres
5
Plastics Demands by Segment and Polymer type in 2013
Source : PlasticsEurope 2014
Packaging, building & construction and automotive are the top three markets for plastics
6
Environmental Impact of Plastics
• Most of the fossil fuel based plastics takes more than 100 years to degrade and are not only to pollute the environment but actually harm many living organisms.
• Plastics are cheap to produce but very expensive to clean the environment.
• Future generation will suffer from the pollution caused by plastic.
www.epa.com 2013
7
Current Situation in South Africa
SA is leading countries in the worlds with mechanical recycling.
SA currently only uses mechanical recycling and no other energy from waste plant yet operational.
280 000 tons produced in 2013. 220 400 tons were plastics packaging. 20% all plastics manufactured were
recycled in 2013 with 4.1% increase from 2012 recycling rate.
Plastics SA announced Zero Plastics to Landfill by 2030.
*Mechanical recycling refers recover plastics waste via mechanical pro-cesses (grinding, washing, separating, drying, re-granulating and compounding), and converted into new plastics products, often substituting virgin plastics
8
Agricultural Wastes & Undervalued Biomass for Developing Green Materials
Lignin(Paper Industry)
Crude Glycerol(Biodiesel Industry)
Jute fibre Flax fibre Hemp fibre Prepared kenaf fibre
Switchgrass
Natural Fibres from Agricultural feed stock
By-products and Co-products from Biofuel industry
Value-added uses: Economic Benefit + Replacement for Petro-based Products + Reduced GHG Emission
Lignin(Bioethanol Industry)
Post harvested Agricultural Residues
Sugarcane Bagasse Maize stalks
9
R&D to Support SA Industrial Sectors Identified as Strategic
IPAP focused sector
Aerospace
Automotive
Rail transport Equipme
nt
Renewable Energy
Agro-processin
g
Plastics
Contribution to SA GDP -
R3.4bn (7% of GDP)
R44.2 billion
(2.54% of GDP)
-
R7.7bn (16. % of
GDP)
R50 bn (-R7bn trade
deficit) Sector objective
Substantially diversify and deepen the components supply chain.
Substantially diversify and deepen the components supply chain.
Metal fabrication, capital and rail transport equipment
Increase local content on renewable energy components
Value addition of waste stream to increase beneficiation
Address environmental concerns regarding plastic manufacturing and waste disposal
Source: IPAP 2014/15
10 10
Why Green composite Materials? Limited petroleum resource Increasing cost of petroleum Reduction in ‘Greenhouse’ gases New sustainable materials for
various structural applications
Made from Renewable resources Recyclable Biodegradable (end of life) Economically viable Environmentally acceptable
Benefits
Green Composites : Opportunities and Challanges
11
Non-Renewable Energy Process Product(s) Landfill or Incineration
Conventional
Waste
Fossil Energy
Bioprocess
Biobased
By-product(s)
Bioprocess Bioproduct(s)Renewable Bioresource
Recycle into bioresource
Biomass
Why Green Materials
12
WORLD BIOPLASTICS DEMAND
Global production capacities of bioplastics by market segment
1.1 million metric tons in 2013.
1.4 million metric tons in 2014
About 6 million metric tons in 2019,
Annual growth rate (CAGR) of 32.7% for
the five-year period, 2014 to 2019.
Bioplastics Demand
Bioplastic Economic : Strengthening International competitiveness of bio-based products
13
Agricultural Biomass for Biobased Products
Biomass Manufacture
CelluloseStarchHemicellulose
LigninOil
Biobased Products
Reuse
IntermediatesAdditives (Modifier)Adhesives, Coating,
Microfibrillated cellulose nanofibres
The Conversion Chain
Biocomposites
Biodegrade Recycle
Disposal Use
Sugarcane bagasse Maize stalk
14
MOTIVATION
• Waste management in South Africa faces numerous challenges due to growing
population and economy, leading to increased volumes of waste generated.
• This puts pressure on waste management facilities, which are already in short supply.
• Farmers also experience major challenges in handling agricultural wastes.
ANTICIPATED BENEFITS: • Waste management strategy• Environmental benefits (Low carbon economy)• Creation of green jobs
15
OBJECTIVES
• IDENTIFY GAPS IN THE PLASTIC MARKET TO MEET THE LOCAL PLASTIC DEMANDS
• TO PERFORM TECHNO-ECONOMIC STUDY IN COLLABORATION WITH CSIR-ECD (ENTERPRICE CREATION DEVELOPMENT) TO DEVELOP THE MANUFACTURING INDUSTRY
• TO HAVE IMPACT TO COMMUNITIES
• CREATE GREEN JOBS
• “TO TURN WASTE INTO PROFIT”
16
OVERVIEW OF R&D INITIATIVE
Maize Stalk
Sugarcane Baggasse
Asanda et al 2015(118) Carbohydrate polymer
17
Extraction of cellulose nanocrystals and nano fibres from Maize stalk residues
Asanda et al 2015(118) Carbohydrate polymerAsanda et al 2014 , Composite Part A
18
AFM characterizations of Nanocellulose
A
Cellulose nanofibres (CNFs) Cellulose nanocrystals (CNCs)
Asanda et al 2015(118) Carbohydrate polymer
19
Development of Biodegradable Green Composites based from Natural Fibre/Bioplastics
20
Optimized biodegradable green composites based from PLA/cellulose fibres for Packaging Applications
• Targeted optimized composite made from maize stalk residue.
• Such green composites have the potential of substituting their petroleum-based counterparts such as polypropylene (PP) with added advantages of compostibility and low carbon economy.
0 10 20 300
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
Tensile Strength (Mpa)Elongation (%)
Micro crystaline cellulose fibres (%)
Neat Biopoly-mer
Mechanical properties
Data from CSIR MSM-PE ongoing research activities
21
Preparation of PFA composites
Furfuryl alcohol (FA) Acidified FA
Acidified FA-particle mixture
P-toluene sulfonic acid
7 days
1. 50 C for 5 ⁰days
2. 100 C for 1h⁰3. 160 C for 1h⁰
Maize particles
PFA compositeTensile properties
Data from CSIR MSM-PE ongoing research activities
22
COMPOSTIBILITY AND BIODEGRADATION TESTING FACILITY
C Substrate Microbial Transformation CO2 + H2O + New Microbial Biomass
SA does not have Industrial composting set up.. This facility can support for testing biodegradable and compostable materials
23
BIODEGRADATION TESTING OF POLYMERIC MATERIALS AND PLASTICS
24
ISO Standard
s
Title Test Duratio
n
Test Validity
14852:1999
Determination of the ultimate aerobic biodegradability of plastic materials in an aqueous medium - Method by analysis of evolved carbon dioxide
6 months
At least 60% biodegr. reference material
14855:1999
Determination of the ultimate aerobic biodegraability and disintegration of plastic materials under controlled composting conditions - Method by analysis of evolved carbon dioxide
6 months
At least 60% biodegr. reference material
17556:2003
Plastics - Determination of the ultimate aerobic biodegradability in soil by measuring the oxygen demand in a respirometer or the amount of carbon dioxide evolved
6 months (2 years)
At least 60% biodegr. reference material
14855:1 Determination of the ultimate aerobic biodegradability and disintegration of plastic materials under controlled composting conditions - Method by analysis of evolved carbon dioxide; Amendment 1: Use of activated vermiculite instead of mature compost
6 months
At least 60% biodegr. reference material
14855:2 Determination of the ultimate aerobic biodegradability and disintegration of plastic materials under controlled composting conditions - Part 2: Gravimetric measurement of carbon dioxide evolved in a laboratory-scale test
6 months
At least 60% biodegr. reference material
20200:2004
Plastics - Determination of the degree of disintegration of plastic materials under simulated composting conditions in a laboratory-scale test
List of Standard Biodegradation Tests, Guides and Practices Available at the CSIR-MSM,PE for Analyzing the Environmental Degradability of Plastic Materials
25
CEN Standard
s
Title Test Duratio
n
Test Validity
EN-ISO 14852:2004
Determination of the ultimate aerobic biodegradability of plastic materials in an aqueous medium - Method by analysis of evolved carbon dioxide (ISO 14852:1999)
6 months At least 60% biodegr. reference material
EN-ISO 14855:2004
Determination of the ultimate aerobic biodegraability and disintegration of plastic materials under controlled composting conditions - Method by analysis of evolved carbon dioxide (ISO 14855:1999)
6 months At least 60% biodegr. reference material
EN 14046:2003
Packaging - Evaluation of the ultimate aerobic biodegradability of packaging materials under controlled composting conditions - Method by analysis of released carbon dioxide
45 days (to be extended)
At least 70% biodegr. reference material
EN 14047:2002
Packaging - Determination of the ultimate aerobic biodegradability of packaging materials in an aqueous medium - Method by analysis of evolved carbon dioxide
At least 70% biodegr. reference material
prCEN/TR 15822
Plastics - Biodegradable plastics in or on soil - Recovery, disposal and related environmental issues
List of Standard Biodegradation Tests, Guides and Practices Available at the CSIR-MSM,PE for Analyzing the Environmental Degradability of Plastic Materials
26
ASTM Standards
Title Test duration
Test validity
D6954-04 Standard Guide for Exposing and Testing Plastics that Degrade in the Environment by a Combination of Oxidation and Biodegradation
D5988-03 Standard Test Method for Determining Aerobic Biodegradation in Soil of Plastic Materials or Residual Plastic Materials After Composting
1 year At least 70% biodegr. reference material
D6002-96 (2002)
Standard Guide for Assessing the Compostability of Environmentally Degradable Plastics
D5338-98 (2003)
Standard Test Method for Determining Aerobic Biodegradation of Plastic Materials Under Controlled Composting Conditions
45 days (to be extended)
At least 70% biodegr. reference material
D6691-01 Standard Test Method for Determining Aerobic Biodegradation of Plastic Materials in the Marine Environment by a Defined Microbial Consortium
D5209-92 Standard Test Method for Determining the Aerobic Biodegradation of Plastic Materials in the Presence of Municipal Sewage Sludge
D5511-02*
Standard Test Method for Determining Anaerobic Biodegradation of Plastic Materials Under High-Solids Anaerobic-Digestion Conditions
4 months At least 70% biodegr. reference material
D5526-94 (2002)*
Standard Test Method for Determining Anaerobic Biodegradation of Plastic Materials Under Accelerated Landfill Conditions
4 months At least 70% biodegr. reference material
D5510-94 (2001)
Standard Practice for Heat Aging of Oxidatively Degradable Plastics
D5272-92 (1999)
Standard Practice for Outdoor Exposure Testing of Photodegradable Plastics
List of Standard Biodegradation Tests, Guides and Practices Available at the CSIR-MSM,PE for Analyzing the Environmental Degradability of Plastic Materials
27
BIODEGRADABILITY AND COMPOSTABILITY OF BIOBASED MATERIALS
SEM Analysis
PLA/tough biopolymer blends PLA/MCC blends
28
BIODEGRADATION STUDIES OF GREEN COMPOSITE MATERIALS AND ITS CONSTITUENTS UNDER
COMPOSITING CONDITIONS
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
Bio
degr
adat
ion
(%)
180160140120100806040200
Incubation Time (Days)
Neat Bioplastic
Maize Stalk residues
Bioplastic/Maize stalk Biocomposite
Biofillers enhances the biodegradability of polymer matrix
Completion of carbon cycle in short span
29
OVERVIEW OF R&D INITIATIVE
CSIR PATENT: POLYMERIZATION OF FURFURYL ALCOHOL (FA) TO DEVELOP SUSTAINABLE MATERIALS
30
OVERVIEW OF R&D INITIATIVES: BIOCOMPOSITES FOR PACKAGING
Maize stalk residues have potential of substituting non-biodegradable petroleum Polypropylene (PP) with added advantage of biodegradable and low carbon economy.
Making the technology adaptable for real-world applications and possible commercialization.SA exports fruits and paying carbon tax OUTCOME : IP opportunities PARTNERSHIP (INDUSTRY)
31
OVERVIEW OF R&D INITIATIVE: BIOCOMPOSITES FOR GREEN BUILDINGS (4 PROTOTYPES)
BIO-BRICK
ROOF PANELS
THERMAL INSULATION MATERIAL
32
CONCLUSIONS AND ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
• 4 PROTOTYPES
• 6 RESEARCH PUBLICATIONS
• IP DEVELOPMENT (Opportunities)
• PROPOSAL SUBMITTED FOR MANUFACTURING INDUSTRY
• PARTNERSHIP (INDUSTRY)
BCOC
33
Research Project Team Members: Research Group Leader: Dr. Sunshine Blouw, CSIR- Material Science & Manufacturing, Fibre & Textile Competency Area
Research Scientist Dr. Sudhakar Muniyasamy (Joined in July 2013)Dr. Tshwafo Motaung
Ph.D. studentMr Asanda MtibeMr Osei Ofosu
Undergraduate Research Assistant Mr Abongile Gada Ms Sandisiwe BalaMr Thuso Tserane Anelisa Billi
POTENTIAL IMPACT: Human Capital Development
34
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
RESEARCHER • Dr Linda Z. Linganiso (Senior Researcher)
FUNDING• DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL AFFAIRS, DBSA Green Fund• DST –BCoC• CSIR