View
33
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Evaluating N export from a tile drained headwater watershed in central Ohio
Mark WilliamsKevin KingNorm Fausey
Soil Drainage Research Unit Columbus, OH
69th SWCS International Annual ConferenceJuly 27-30, 2014
< 11 to 1010 to 100100 to 500500 to 1000> 1000
Yield (kg km-2 yr-1)
(USGS NAWQA Program; water.usgs.gov)
Nitrogen processing in headwater watersheds controls downstream water quality
Strahler stream order
(Adapted from Alexander et al., 2007)
% o
f str
eam
N lo
ad fr
om
head
wat
er s
trea
ms
Drainage is required for agricultural production but can facilitate increased nitrogen transport
Land benefiting from improved drainage
2 to 55 to 1010 to 20
20 to 4040 to 60> 60
Percent
Above: University of Minnesota research plotsRight: USDA-ARS field-scale research in Ohio
Majority of subsurface drainage research has been conducted at plot and field scales
Some examples:Logan et al. (1994) – annual N loads up to 86 kg ha-1 from tile drained plots
Jaynes et al. (2001) – annual N load between 13 and 61 kg ha-1 from a 22 ha field
Nested watershed design(e.g., Tomer et al., 2003)
Watersheds with different drainage intensity(e.g., Kennedy et al., 2012)
Extrapolate plot and field scale results (e.g., David et al., 1997)
Common methods to infer the effect of tile drainage on watershed nitrogen export
B1
B2 B4
B3
B8
B6
B5
0 150 300 600 1,200m
Long-term tile and watershed monitoring in central Ohio
1. Summarize discharge and water quality data from long-term monitoring in watershed B
2. Quantify the relationship between discharge and nitrogen concentration
3. Determine the contributions of tile drainage to watershed nitrogen loads
Study objectives:
Watershed characteristicsArea: 389 ha
Slope: 0.009 m m-1
Soil types:Bennington silt loam (53%)Pewamo clay loam (46%)
Drained area: 319 ha (82%)7 to 201 ha
Tile depth: 0.9 to 1.0 m
Tile spacing: 15 m
Precipitation: 985 mm yr-1
Management:Corn-soybean rotation with rotational tillage
Discharge & water quality monitoring
Watershed outlet Tile drain
Tile drain Isco equipment
Tile & watershed hydrology
0
30
60
90
120
150
J F M A M J J A S O N D
Aver
age
disc
harg
e &
ra
infa
ll (m
m)
MonthPrecipitation Tile flow Watershed discharge
King et al. 2014. J. Environ. Qual. (in progress)
Storage/evaporation
Annual rainfall (1,004 mm)
Summed tile discharge (283 mm)
Runoff/ seepage
Watershed discharge (508 mm)
49%
28%23%
Water balance
773 to 1,239 mm
Variability
310 to 767 mm (39-62%)
187 to 564 mm (18-45%)
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
Wtrshd B OH IA MN IL
% o
f rai
nfal
l rec
over
ed a
s di
scha
rge
3.9 km2
1.2 km2
481 km2
16000 km2
Logan et al. (1980) Algoazany et al. (2007)
Watershed Tile
Comparing precipitation to discharge ratios across studies show similar relationships
Total N concentration (mg L-1)
NO
3-N
con
cent
ratio
n (m
g L-
1 )Nitrate (NO3-N) was the predominant form of nitrogen in stream and tile water
NO
3-N
con
c. (m
g L-
1 )
0.0
15.0
30.0
45.0
60.0
0 0.25 0.5 0.75 1Edge-of-field tile
(7-28 ha)
Tile main(22-49 ha)
County main
(201 ha)
Watershed outlet
(389 ha)
Percent of time NO3-N conc. was equaled or exceeded
47%14%4%
Nitrate concentrations were variable and often exceeded 10 mg L-1
NO
3-N
con
cent
ratio
n (m
g L-
1 )
10010-310-510-7
Discharge (mm h-1)Field tile (B2, B4, B8) Tile main (B5, B6)County main (B3) Watershed outlet (B1)
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
Winter Spring Summer Fall
Summed tileWatershed
Season
a
b bb
b b
a
c
Nitrate concentrations increased with increasing discharge and varied seasonally
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
0 5
NO3-N
J F M A M J J A S O N D
NO
3-N
con
c. (m
g L-
1 )
Month
CornSoybean
Nitrate concentrations in edge-of-field tiles were typically greater when corn was planted
B2, B4, and B8
Watershed outletSummed tile
NO
3-N
load
(kg
ha-1
)
Month
J F M A M J J A S O N D
Year
Monthly and annual nitrate loads
Tile
NO
3-N
load
(kg
ha-1
)
Watershed NO3-N load (kg ha-1)
Tile drainage accounted for 56% of monthly watershed discharge and 73% of nitrate export
Tile drainage contributes significantly to nitrogen export from systematically drained headwater watersheds
Discharge NO3-N load
56% 73%
Keeping nitrogen in fields and out of streams
Nitrogen leaching
In-stream processing??
Practices with potential
Drainage water management
Cover crops
4R nutrient stewardship
Questions??
Contact Information:Mark WilliamsUSDA-ARS590 Woody Hayes Dr.Columbus, OH [email protected]