55
www.invc.co .uk Industrial Noise and Vibration Centre: www.invc.co.uk The Environmental Noise The Environmental Noise Industry is Not Fit for Industry is Not Fit for Purpose… Purpose… Peter Wilson MSc. MIOA Peter Wilson MSc. MIOA Noise Control Best Practice nois e

Environmental "noise industry" is not fit for purpose

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

The "noise industry" is generally woefully ignorant of diagnostic techniques and modern noise control methods. Consequently, thousands of people are needlessly exposed to stressful noise over prolonged periods, resulting in unnecessary deaths from stress (BMJ/WHO reports). Very large sums of money are also wasted on inappropriate mitigation - there is a diagnostic process that must be followed to evaluate any noise nuisance problem. The presentation includes case studies illustrating how so much money has been wasted on poor diagnoses and inappropriate noise control measures - plus examples of how it should be done using best practice...

Citation preview

Page 1: Environmental "noise industry" is not fit for purpose

ww

w.in

vc.c

o.uk

Industrial Noise and Vibration Centre: www.invc.co.uk

The Environmental Noise The Environmental Noise Industry is Not Fit for Industry is Not Fit for

Purpose…Purpose…

Peter Wilson MSc. MIOAPeter Wilson MSc. MIOA

Noise Control Best Practice

noise

Page 2: Environmental "noise industry" is not fit for purpose

ww

w.in

vc.c

o.uk

In Summary

The “Noise Industry”• Generally displays a woeful ignorance of both diagnostic

techniques and modern noise control methods

The Victims• Thousands of people are therefore needlessly exposed to

stressful noise from industrial / commercial premises over prolonged periods

• Many unnecessary deaths consequently (BMJ and WHO reports)

• Companies waste a fortune on inappropriate mitigation

The Best Practice to Avoid the Problems• The diagnostic procedure that must be followed to

evaluate any potential noise nuisance problem• Case studies illustrating poor practice in attempted

mitigation (and failed mitigation) of common noise problems• Examples of best practice

Page 3: Environmental "noise industry" is not fit for purpose

ww

w.in

vc.c

o.uk

Noise Kills…

WHO Report: 2011• Europe: c3% of deaths from heart attacks is attributable to

long term exposure to (mainly nighttime) environmental noise

• 2% of the population suffer from severe sleep disturbance• 15% suffer from serious annoyance• UK noise complaints increased by x5 over the last 20 years• Learning abilities of children badly affected

BMJ Report: 2013• Environmental noise increases the risk of stroke and

coronary heart disease due to raised blood pressure and hypertension

• Near Heathrow, 24% increased hospital admissions due to stroke; 21% increase due to coronary heart disease; 14% increase for cardiovascular disease cf low noise areas

All dB(A) based – but many noise issues are low frequency,so these figures seriously underestimate the problem…

Page 4: Environmental "noise industry" is not fit for purpose

ww

w.in

vc.c

o.uk

BS 4142 – technically…

BS 4142 is almost ubiquitous, largely because it exists…However, it is often (badly) applied to situations where it is not suitable.

• BS 4142 is supposed to assess the likelihood of complaints from people inside a building by measuring dB(A) outside

• inside rooms, the T.L. of windows shapes the spectrum, reducing mid and high frequency components - almost un-'A' weighting the sound

• does not work well for noise containing low frequencies • 5dB(A) correction for noise with tones• tonal noise at 5dB(A) below non-tonal noise should be

equally disturbing• should not be used where background noise levels are very

low (<30dB(A))

Page 5: Environmental "noise industry" is not fit for purpose

ww

w.in

vc.c

o.uk

Environmental Noise Control is ....

…not just about the overall level…

• Effective noise control must be based on an accurate diagnosis that relates noise features to subjective impact, not just on assumptions about overall dB(A).

• Although dB(A) may also be an additional planning / specification requirement, this is often a completely separate issue.

• Noise control is an engineering problem that should be solved by engineering means at source wherever practical.

• All the options must be considered, not just the high cost conventional palliatives of barriers, enclosures and silencers.http://www.invc.co.uk/noise/noise-control/environmental-noise-control/

Page 6: Environmental "noise industry" is not fit for purpose

ww

w.in

vc.c

o.ukAttitude, Attitude, Attitude - Placebo Silencers

Page 7: Environmental "noise industry" is not fit for purpose

ww

w.in

vc.c

o.uk

Best Practice Elements

• Attitude

• Diagnosis - understand the cause of the subjective problem

based on detailed diagnosis, objective evaluation linking noise features to complaints – temporal and tonal components

link problem noise features to specific mechanical / aerodynamic plant elements.

• Assess the Noise Control Options based on current best practice. The majority of noise

control recommendations that we see are either not fit for purpose or are far more costly than necessary.

• Recommend / Implement Best Practice Noise Control Option

typically reduces noise control costs by 50% - 110%! reduces the time required to solve problems (often from

years to weeks)

Page 8: Environmental "noise industry" is not fit for purpose

ww

w.in

vc.c

o.uk

Diagnosis, Diagnosis, Diagnosis…

You’re just guessing…The approach taken to mitigate noise problems is often based on guesswork.There should be no guesswork involved.

•Temporal DiagnosisEvents, intermittency, turn plant on and off, variation over time…

•Frequency ContentBroadband: octavesTones: narrow band frequency analysis

Note: 1/3 octaves are largely a waste of time. This is the 21st century - FFT is available free on smartphones…

•Audio RecordingsAny SLM can be used to produce calibrated audio files that can then be analysed by ear and by softwarePlay back modified audio to the complainant

Page 9: Environmental "noise industry" is not fit for purpose

ww

w.in

vc.c

o.uk

Source Identification and Ranking

Identification Techniques

• run each source separately - measure in far field at reference points

• measure each source close in and predict noise levels (sound power and propagation)

• use narrow band frequency analysis - compare far field and close in signatures

Rank the Sources• …by the subjective impact, NOT just dB(A)

Page 10: Environmental "noise industry" is not fit for purpose

ww

w.in

vc.c

o.uk

Cooling Towers

Page 11: Environmental "noise industry" is not fit for purpose

ww

w.in

vc.c

o.uk

Rank Multiple Sources Cooling Towers

Ranked sources

• large cooling tower

• small cooling tower

• main pumps (5)

• lift pumps (13)

Ranked local sources for dominant contributor:

Large cooling tower

• tower air outlets (3)

• tower air inlets (3)

• fan motors

Page 12: Environmental "noise industry" is not fit for purpose

ww

w.in

vc.c

o.uk

Rank Multiple Sources Cooling Towers

Ranked sourcestower air outlets (3)tower air inlets (3)main pumps (5)lift pumps (13)

Conventional:3 sets of silencers (outlets) + noise barrier at boundary at c £30,000; 56dB(A)

Detailed DiagnosisModify outlets and inlets, silence main pump cooling fans, local screening for lift pumps at c £5000; <50dB(A)

Page 13: Environmental "noise industry" is not fit for purpose

ww

w.in

vc.c

o.uk

Cooling Tower: Untreated / Treated

Page 14: Environmental "noise industry" is not fit for purpose

ww

w.in

vc.c

o.uk

Cooling Tower Pumps: Untreated / Treated

Page 15: Environmental "noise industry" is not fit for purpose

ww

w.in

vc.c

o.uk

Battery Stack Diagnosis

Page 16: Environmental "noise industry" is not fit for purpose

ww

w.in

vc.c

o.uk

Battery Factory Stacks

Diagnostic measurements• synchronise recording time and engineer's watch• define shut-down and start-up sequence for stacks• engineer notes time of each operation• record whole period• analyse recording - use timings to identify sources

Solution• purpose designed silencer inserts dropped into 4 of

the 5 stacks• 12 - 15 dB(A) reduction in stack noise

Page 17: Environmental "noise industry" is not fit for purpose

ww

w.in

vc.c

o.uk

Press Shop Noise Complaints

•£12k wasted on factory end wall treatment, £65k additional roof improvements planned (no guarantee) and £40k+ legal fees spent…

•3 presses required treatment - c£12k solved problem.

http://www.invc.co.uk/noise/noise-control/environmental-noise-control/#casestudies

Page 18: Environmental "noise industry" is not fit for purpose

ww

w.in

vc.c

o.uk

Air Handling / Chiller Units

The ProblemSeveral chillers and 2 large AHUs installed at the rear of a high tech facility were causing serious environmental noise complaints (more than 10dB(A) above background with tonal content). £100k spent on ineffective noise control - one chiller fitted with silencers, simple noise barrier erected (which also caused air-flow problems) - but with no effect on complaints….

The SolutionThe primary requirement was to carry out an accurate diagnosis that would allow the sources to be ranked in terms of their contribution to the environmental noise and then to rank the noise sources within each of the significant contributors.

http://www.invc.co.uk/noise/noise-control/environmental-noise-control/#casestudies

Page 19: Environmental "noise industry" is not fit for purpose

ww

w.in

vc.c

o.uk

AHU Diagnosis and Noise Control

Diagnosis• 2 existing acoustic louvres on each unit for extract and

supply air. Detailed noise measurements were carried out inside each plenum and outside each louvre over the operating range of the unit.

- top louvre (extract) 4dB(A) noisier- poor design due to potential for air recirculation

Noise Control• turn top louvre round (also improve performance)• line plenums with acoustic absorbent• fit baffle to extract fan outlet to reduce noise transmission

down into supply plenum and out through louvre• plenum lining and baffle reduced noise by 5.5dB(A)• total noise reduction just over 10dB(A)

Page 20: Environmental "noise industry" is not fit for purpose

ww

w.in

vc.c

o.uk

Air Handling Unit: Re-directed Extract

Extract

Supply

Page 21: Environmental "noise industry" is not fit for purpose

ww

w.in

vc.c

o.uk

Diagnosis Outside Plenums

Page 22: Environmental "noise industry" is not fit for purpose

ww

w.in

vc.c

o.uk

AHU Modifications

complainants

before

after

extract

supply

84dB(A)

80dB(A) filter

louvres

absorbent

baffle78dB(A)

Page 23: Environmental "noise industry" is not fit for purpose

ww

w.in

vc.c

o.uk

Chiller Silencers and Barrier

Intake and exhaust silencers fitted by supplier. Exhaust silencers have some benefit, intakes none as the chiller is open at the far end. The barriers have only a small effect for similar reasons.

Page 24: Environmental "noise industry" is not fit for purpose

ww

w.in

vc.c

o.uk

Dry Chiller: Impellor Change

noisy impellor

quiet impellor

Page 25: Environmental "noise industry" is not fit for purpose

ww

w.in

vc.c

o.uk

Panel Vibration Reduction

damped

undamped

Total 8dB(A) noise reduction under chiller (damping + absorbent)

Page 26: Environmental "noise industry" is not fit for purpose

ww

w.in

vc.c

o.uk

Source Ranking and Target Level

Overall target at complainant: 40dB(A): (35dB(A) + 35dB(A) + 35dB(A))Eliminate tonal components

Page 27: Environmental "noise industry" is not fit for purpose

ww

w.in

vc.c

o.uk

Chiller Plant Noise Reduction

Page 28: Environmental "noise industry" is not fit for purpose

ww

w.in

vc.c

o.uk

bedroomwindow open/shut

grinder 5m

cooling towers 1 / 2 at 2m

Cooling Tower Tonal Source ID

Page 29: Environmental "noise industry" is not fit for purpose

ww

w.in

vc.c

o.uk

Cooling Towers: Detail

Only 71.3Hz blade pass of fans in tower 1 matches bedroom spectrum - grinder and tower 2 are eliminated as sources

Page 30: Environmental "noise industry" is not fit for purpose

ww

w.in

vc.c

o.uk

Remote Control of Noise

video sound photos

email -internet

Specialised analysis

BPM

BAT

Costs

database

experience

@@

http://www.invc.co.uk/noise/noise-control/remote-control-of-noise/

Page 31: Environmental "noise industry" is not fit for purpose

ww

w.in

vc.c

o.uk

Remote Control of Noise

Roof-top fans

£50k wasted on acoustic lagging – no effectAerodynamic modifications135Hz reduced by 17dB270Hz reduced by 22dB

http://www.invc.co.uk/noise/noise-control/remote-control-of-noise/

Page 32: Environmental "noise industry" is not fit for purpose

ww

w.in

vc.c

o.uk

Noise Complaints from Industrial Premises

Source: National Physical Laboratory

Page 33: Environmental "noise industry" is not fit for purpose

ww

w.in

vc.c

o.uk

Fan Noise Control Options

Techniques by priority and cost effectiveness….

•Control at sourceengineering modificationsefficiency – lowest fan noise coincides with maximum efficiencyvibration isolation and vibration damping

Only if the above are not practical should you consider…

•Silencing

•Enclosures

•Lagging

•Barriers

•Building modifications

Conventionally, these high cost techniques have been the only measures that are considered….

http://www.invc.co.uk/noise/noise-control/fan-noise-reduction/

Page 34: Environmental "noise industry" is not fit for purpose

ww

w.in

vc.c

o.uk

Innovative Noise Control Technology

These are some of the innovations we use as part of current best practice in environmental noise control.

• Quiet Fan technology (QFt)

typically 10% - 20% of the cost, no effect on fan efficiency

• Chiller / HVAC noise control

<20% of the cost, free cooling unaffected, higher efficiency

• Fan / combustion stacks

retro-fit, low cost, fast

• Burner / combustion noise

source control technology – typically <5% of the cost

• Acoustic Camouflage

psychological electronic silencing

Page 35: Environmental "noise industry" is not fit for purpose

ww

w.in

vc.c

o.uk

London: Office A/C Plant…

• Chillers on top of high-rise office block caused noise complaints in an adjacent street

• Noise consultancy carried out BS 4142 assessment and recommended replacing one of the chillers

• Chiller replaced at cost of £100k, several dB(A) quieter at 1m• Complaints unabated as the noise nuisance was caused by

low frequency tonal noise from a different chiller…

http://www.invc.co.uk/noise/noise-control/fan-noise-reduction/#chiller

Page 36: Environmental "noise industry" is not fit for purpose

ww

w.in

vc.c

o.uk

Diageo Chiller

Cooling tower noise experts report conclusion:-• “A “pure tone” is extremely difficult to eradicate as it

requires changes to the mass being excited and as indicated is a direct result of the noise power at a primary frequency being amplified and combined with other harmonics across the frequency band.

• There is no quick fix or simple change that can cure such phenomena. In order to cut the generated noise level from this cooling tower we believe the only solution is to correct the fault at source with a fan change out but while doing so install a low sound fan i.e. wide cord, sophisticated profile, larger diameter and run at slower speed.”

• £30,500 plus downtime of several days.

Page 37: Environmental "noise industry" is not fit for purpose

ww

w.in

vc.c

o.uk

Diageo Chiller

Diagnosis•£30k recommendation made with no frequency analysis…•Analysis of video soundtrack via email – 10 minutes•670Hz tone is gear-mesh frequency of motor pinion•Recommended replace gear•Whole gearbox replaced <£3,000, downtime c one day

Video soundtrack analysis

Page 38: Environmental "noise industry" is not fit for purpose

ww

w.in

vc.c

o.uk

Dryer Fan

The recommendation from the first noise specialist was the following:• Replace impeller or whole fan if practicable to prevent tone

being generated. A cost estimate for a replacement fan and discharge silencer was obtained at approximately £100k and would require an extended shutdown to install and modify the existing duct-work to suit.

• Fit attenuators to fan if necessary to reduce noise levels at stack by 5 - 10 dB. The proposal was to add a top conical section to the stack to increase the exit velocity. This was not pursued as it had high installation cost as the stack could not self-support the new section.

http://www.invc.co.uk/noise/noise-control/fan-noise-reduction/

Page 39: Environmental "noise industry" is not fit for purpose

ww

w.in

vc.c

o.uk

Dryer Fan

Diagnosis•£100k recommendation made with no frequency analysis…•An internet search by the Precipitates Plant Manager led company to approach us about our Quiet Fan technology…•The noise control measures reduced the tone by 20dB, cost <£7k and paid for themselves in around 9 months as they reduce power consumption…

Noise analysishttp://www.invc.co.uk/noise/noise-control/fan-noise-reduction/

Page 40: Environmental "noise industry" is not fit for purpose

ww

w.in

vc.c

o.uk

Corrugation Plant

• Abatement notice - £150k quoted for building modification - with no guarantee of success. EHO suggested our 2nd opinion…

• Diagnosed corrugator roller tones and defined BPM.

• Reduced tonal content at source by 12dB – and eliminated PPE requirement – for cost of £25k…

Page 41: Environmental "noise industry" is not fit for purpose

ww

w.in

vc.c

o.uk

Restaurant Fans and Chiller

Kitchen extract exhaust system and chiller on roof65dB(A) outside bathroom window; 33dB(A) in bedroomConsultant recommendation: move chiller + build noise barrier; expensive silencer in duct

Page 42: Environmental "noise industry" is not fit for purpose

ww

w.in

vc.c

o.uk

Restaurant Fans and Chiller

Naked chiller Proposed silencer (£400)

Page 43: Environmental "noise industry" is not fit for purpose

ww

w.in

vc.c

o.uk

Restaurant Fans and Chiller

Bedroom and room below chiller

Chiller tone at 48.5Hz + harmonics – previous recommendations would not have worked….

Page 44: Environmental "noise industry" is not fit for purpose

ww

w.in

vc.c

o.uk

Chiller Fans

Low frequency noise complaints (48.5Hz)Money wasted on recommended noise barrier…

Emailed this video. Analysed soundtrack to reveal tonal content…

http://www.invc.co.uk/noise/noise-control/fan-noise-reduction/#chiller

Page 45: Environmental "noise industry" is not fit for purpose

ww

w.in

vc.c

o.uk

Chiller Fans

Aerodynamic modifications reduced 48.5Hz tone by 13dB and other tones by up to 20dB plus improved efficiency… 8 fans, < £4k

http://www.invc.co.uk/noise/noise-control/fan-noise-reduction/#chiller

Page 46: Environmental "noise industry" is not fit for purpose

ww

w.in

vc.c

o.uk

Schiller Biomass Power Station Fan

• 50MW station (largest in USA) noise problem: 2 storey ID fan.

• Conventional silencer had a very big impact on efficiency

• QFt fitted in only 12 hours!• 10dB reduction in noise• Fan power consumption

reduced• No site visit…“…the 3m wide ID combustion

fan could be heard across the river… after installation (only 12 hours)…10dB drop in noise, which is huge…recorded a reduction in ID fan power after QFt had been installed.” – Jim Granger, Senior Engineer

http://www.invc.co.uk/noise/noise-control/fan-noise-reduction/

Page 47: Environmental "noise industry" is not fit for purpose

ww

w.in

vc.c

o.uk

Scrap Can Extract and Chopper Fans

modified fan

ProblemOccupational + environmental tonal noise

Conventional•silencers, lagging and

enclosures•capital cost > c£35000 +

maintenance costs

BPM Engineering•internal fan modification

reduced tones by 23dB and overall noise by 22dB(A)

•cost c £3000 - no maintenance costs (lasts the lifetime of the fans despite passage of cans)

http://www.invc.co.uk/noise/noise-control/fan-noise-reduction/

Page 48: Environmental "noise industry" is not fit for purpose

ww

w.in

vc.c

o.uk

Thermal Oxidiser Fans

New plant – supplier suggested earth berm, enclosures etc

CMB asked for a 2nd opinion

BPM – Quiet fan technology, remove “beating”, damper type and location changed, small secondary silencers: 15dB(A) reduction >£100k saved and more efficient….

Page 49: Environmental "noise industry" is not fit for purpose

ww

w.in

vc.c

o.uk

Axial Vent Fans

8 off axial vent fans with 8m long silencers several stories up

112Hz blade pass problem tone reduced by 20dB by fitting invertors to change speed slightly to avoid resonant condition.

http://www.invc.co.uk/noise/noise-control/fan-noise-reduction/#chiller

Page 50: Environmental "noise industry" is not fit for purpose

ww

w.in

vc.c

o.uk

Chiller Farm

£300k quoted to reduce fan noise - several stories up – loss of free cooling

Innovative geometries + control systems + control at source15dB(A) reduction, no loss of efficiency, c £40k…

http://www.invc.co.uk/noise/noise-control/fan-noise-reduction/#chiller

Page 51: Environmental "noise industry" is not fit for purpose

ww

w.in

vc.c

o.ukYoghurt-Based Noise Control - Boiler Burner

16dB tonal noise reduction

http://www.invc.co.uk/noise/noise-control/environmental-noise-control/

Page 52: Environmental "noise industry" is not fit for purpose

ww

w.in

vc.c

o.uk

Cement Works Stack Noise Control

•Plant update to improve efficiency had a disastrous effect on stack noise, causing complaints over a wide area.

•Planned conventional silencing would have been very costly and would have caused unacceptable down-time.

•We designed tuned inserts that were installed over a weekend.

•Noise reduced by 19dB with no effect on system efficiency and at a small fraction of the cost.

http://www.invc.co.uk/noise/noise-control/environmental-noise-control/

Page 53: Environmental "noise industry" is not fit for purpose

ww

w.in

vc.c

o.uk

Remote Control of Noise

BP Refinery: $1.25m conventional silencers: $0.25m via engineering – no impact on efficiency, no site visit

Page 54: Environmental "noise industry" is not fit for purpose

ww

w.in

vc.c

o.uk

In Summary

The “Noise Industry”• Generally displays a woeful ignorance of both diagnostic

techniques and modern noise control methods

The Victims• Thousands of people are therefore needlessly exposed to

stressful noise from industrial / commercial premises over prolonged periods

• Many unnecessary deaths consequently (BMJ and WHO reports)

• Companies waste a fortune on inappropriate mitigation

The Best Practice to Avoid the Problems• The diagnostic procedure that must be followed to

evaluate any potential noise nuisance problem• Case studies illustrating poor practice in attempted

mitigation (and failed mitigation) of common noise problems• Examples of best practice

Page 55: Environmental "noise industry" is not fit for purpose

ww

w.in

vc.c

o.uk

Industrial Noise and Vibration Centre: www.invc.co.uk

Questions?Questions?

Peter Wilson MSc. MIOAPeter Wilson MSc. MIOA

Contact us for further informationContact us for further [email protected] +441753 [email protected] +441753 698800

Noise Control Best Practice

noise