138
Structural Analysis III Structural Analysis - III Fl ibilit M th d 2 Flexibility Method -2 Problems Problems Dr. Rajesh K. N. Assistant Professor in Civil Engineering Assistant Professor in Civil Engineering Govt. College of Engineering, Kannur Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN 1

Module1 flexibility-2-problems- rajesh sir

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

GCE Kannur

Citation preview

Page 1: Module1 flexibility-2-problems- rajesh sir

Structural Analysis IIIStructural Analysis - III

Fl ibilit M th d 2Flexibility Method -2ProblemsProblems

Dr. Rajesh K. N.Assistant Professor in Civil EngineeringAssistant Professor in Civil EngineeringGovt. College of Engineering, Kannur

Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN

1

Page 2: Module1 flexibility-2-problems- rajesh sir

Module I

Matrix analysis of structures

Module I

• Definition of flexibility and stiffness influence coefficients –d l t f fl ibilit t i b h i l h &

Matrix analysis of structures

development of flexibility matrices by physical approach & energy principle.

Flexibility method

• Flexibility matrices for truss beam and frame elements –• Flexibility matrices for truss, beam and frame elements –load transformation matrix-development of total flexibility matrix of the structure –analysis of simple structures –

l t ti b d l f d l l d plane truss, continuous beam and plane frame- nodal loads and element loads – lack of fit and temperature effects.

Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN

2

Page 3: Module1 flexibility-2-problems- rajesh sir

•Problem 1:

Static indeterminacy = 2Choose reactions at B and C as redundantsStatic indeterminacy = 2

Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN3

Released structure

Page 4: Module1 flexibility-2-problems- rajesh sir

1JA 2JA

1QA 2QA1QD 2QD

Joint actions & corresponding displacements Joint actions & corresponding displacements Redundants & corresponding displacements Reactions other than redundants

Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN

Page 5: Module1 flexibility-2-problems- rajesh sir

Fixed end actions

Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN

5Equivalent joint loads

Page 6: Module1 flexibility-2-problems- rajesh sir

Member end actions consideredMember end actions considered

2MA 4MA

1MA LA B

3MA LB C

Hence member flexibility matrix,

L L−⎡ ⎤

[ ] 11 12

21 22

3 6M MMi

L LF F EI EIFF F L L

⎡ ⎤⎢ ⎥⎡ ⎤

= = ⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥ −⎣ ⎦ ⎢ ⎥21 22

6 3M MF F L L

EI EI⎣ ⎦ ⎢ ⎥

⎢ ⎥⎣ ⎦

Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN

6

Page 7: Module1 flexibility-2-problems- rajesh sir

L L−⎡ ⎤

[ ]16 12 ;MEI EIFL L

⎡ ⎤⎢ ⎥

= ⎢ ⎥−⎢ ⎥

⎢ ⎥

Member1:

12 6EI EI⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥⎣ ⎦

L L⎡ ⎤

[ ]23 6

M

L LEI EIFL L

−⎡ ⎤⎢ ⎥

= ⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥

Member2: [ ]

6 3L L

EI EI−⎢ ⎥

⎢ ⎥⎣ ⎦

Unassembled flexibility matrix 2 1 0 0−⎡ ⎤⎢ ⎥

[ ] 1 2 0 00 0 4 212M

LFEI

⎢ ⎥−⎢ ⎥=−⎢ ⎥

⎢ ⎥

Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN

0 0 2 4⎢ ⎥−⎣ ⎦

Page 8: Module1 flexibility-2-problems- rajesh sir

To find [BMS] and [BRS] matrices:

[BMS] and [BRS] are found from the released structure when it is subjected to 1 2 1 21, 1, 1, 1J J Q QA A A A= = = = separately.

1 1JA =

Q Q

2 1JA =2J

1 1QA =

Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN2 1QA =

Page 9: Module1 flexibility-2-problems- rajesh sir

1 1JA =

A B C1

1− 1 0 0

A B C0

1A 2 1JA =

1

1− 1 1− 1

A B C0

1− 1 1− 1

Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN

Page 10: Module1 flexibility-2-problems- rajesh sir

A B CL

1 1QA =

A B C

1

L

L− 0 0 0

A B C2L

2 1QA =1

2L− L L− 0

Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN

Page 11: Module1 flexibility-2-problems- rajesh sir

AJ1 AJ2 AQ1 AQ2

1 1 2L L− − − −⎡ ⎤⎢ ⎥

J1 J2 Q1 Q2=1 =1 =1 =1

[ ] [ ] 1 1 00 1 0MS MJ MQ

LB B B

L

⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥⎡ ⎤⎡ ⎤= =⎣ ⎦⎣ ⎦ ⎢ ⎥− −⎢ ⎥0 1 0 0⎢ ⎥⎣ ⎦

AJ1 AJ2 AQ1 AQ2=1 =1 =1 =1

[ ] [ ] 0 0 1 11 1 2RS RJ RQB B B

L L− −⎡ ⎤

⎡ ⎤⎡ ⎤= = ⎢ ⎥⎣ ⎦⎣ ⎦⎣ ⎦

=1 =1 =1 =1

[ ] [ ]1 1 2Q L L⎣ ⎦⎣ ⎦ − − − −⎣ ⎦

Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN

11

Page 12: Module1 flexibility-2-problems- rajesh sir

[ ] [ ] [ ][ ]TS MS M MSF B F B=[ ] [ ] [ ][ ]S MS M MSF B F B

1 1 0 0 2 1 0 0 1 1 2L L⎡ ⎤⎡ ⎤ ⎡ ⎤1 1 0 0 2 1 0 0 1 1 21 1 1 1 1 2 0 0 1 1 0

L LLL

− − − − − −⎡ ⎤⎡ ⎤ ⎡ ⎤⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥− − − ⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥=⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥0 0 0 0 0 4 2 0 1 012

2 0 0 0 2 4 0 1 0 0L LEIL L L

⎢ ⎥− − − −⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥− − −⎣ ⎦ ⎣ ⎦ ⎣ ⎦

Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN

Page 13: Module1 flexibility-2-problems- rajesh sir

1 1 0 0 3 3 2 51 1 1 1 3 3 4

L LL LL

− − − − −⎡ ⎤ ⎡ ⎤⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥− −⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥

0 0 0 0 6 0 4122 0 0 6 0 2L LEIL L L L

⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥=− − −⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥

⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥− −⎣ ⎦ ⎣ ⎦⎣ ⎦ ⎣ ⎦

6 6 3 9L L⎡ ⎤[ ]

6 6 3 96 18 3 15 JJ JQ

L LF FL LL

⎡ ⎤⎢ ⎥ ⎡ ⎤⎡ ⎤⎣ ⎦⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥

2 2

2 2

3 3 2 5129 15 5 18

QJ QQL L L LEI F FL L L L

⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥= =⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥⎡ ⎤ ⎡ ⎤⎣ ⎦ ⎣ ⎦⎣ ⎦⎢ ⎥⎣ ⎦9 15 5 18L L L L⎣ ⎦

Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN

13

Page 14: Module1 flexibility-2-problems- rajesh sir

R d d t

{ } { }1−⎡ ⎤⎡ ⎤ ⎡ ⎤

Redundants:

{ } { } { }1

Q QQ Q QJ JA F D F A−⎡ ⎤⎡ ⎤ ⎡ ⎤= −⎣ ⎦ ⎣ ⎦⎣ ⎦ { }QD

is a null matrix1

1

is a null matrix{ } { }1

Q QQ QJ JA F F A−

⎡ ⎤ ⎡ ⎤∴ = − ⎣ ⎦ ⎣ ⎦

{ }

13 3 2 22 5 3 3112 12 12 12

L L L LPLEI EI EI EIA

−⎡ ⎤ ⎡ ⎤⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥ ⎧ ⎫⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥ ⎨ ⎬{ } 3 3 2 2 295 18 9 1512 12 12 12

QAL L L LEI EI EI EI

⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥= − ⎨ ⎬⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥ ⎩ ⎭⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥⎣ ⎦ ⎣ ⎦12 12 12 12EI EI EI EI⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥⎣ ⎦ ⎣ ⎦

Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN

14

Page 15: Module1 flexibility-2-problems- rajesh sir

18 5 1 1 1PL ⎡ ⎤ ⎡ ⎤ ⎧ ⎫ 18 5 3P −⎡ ⎤ ⎧ ⎫{ } 18 5 1 1 1

5 2 3 5 233QPLAL

−⎡ ⎤ ⎡ ⎤ ⎧ ⎫−= ⎨ ⎬⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥−⎣ ⎦ ⎣ ⎦ ⎩ ⎭

18 5 35 2 1333

P ⎡ ⎤ ⎧ ⎫−= ⎨ ⎬⎢ ⎥−⎣ ⎦ ⎩ ⎭

33

PP

⎧=

⎫⎨ ⎬⎩ ⎭3P−⎩ ⎭

In the subsequent calculations, the above values of {AQ}

H h fi l l f d d b i d b

q , { Q}should be used.

However, the final values of redundants are obtained by including actual or equivalent joint loads applied directly to the supportsto the supports.

{ } { } { } 33 10 3P PA A A

P−⎧ ⎫ ⎧ ⎫+ +⎨ ⎬ ⎨ ⎬

⎧ ⎫⎨ ⎬Thus

Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN

{ } { } { } 3 2 3Q QC QFINALA A A

P P P= − + = − + =⎨ ⎬ ⎨ ⎬−⎩ ⎭

⎨⎩ ⎭ ⎩

⎬− ⎭Thus,

Page 16: Module1 flexibility-2-problems- rajesh sir

Joint displacements:

{ } [ ]{ } { }J JJ J JQ QD F A F A⎡ ⎤= + ⎣ ⎦

Joint displacements:

{ } [ ]{ } { }J JJ J JQ QD F A F A⎡ ⎤+ ⎣ ⎦

6 6 1 3 9 3L L P⎧ ⎫⎡ ⎤ ⎡ ⎤ ⎧ ⎫6 6 1 3 96 18 2 3 1512 9 1

32 3

L LL PL LL LEI EI

PP

⎧ ⎫⎡ ⎤ ⎡ ⎤= +⎨ ⎬⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥

⎩ ⎭⎣ ⎦ ⎣ −⎦

⎧ ⎫⎨ ⎬⎩ ⎭

2 23 2PL PL⎧ ⎫ ⎧ ⎫3 27 418 12

PL PLEI EI

⎧ ⎫ ⎧ ⎫= −⎨ ⎬ ⎨ ⎬

⎩ ⎭ ⎩ ⎭

2 0PL ⎧ ⎫⎨= ⎬

Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN

118EI ⎨⎩= ⎬

Page 17: Module1 flexibility-2-problems- rajesh sir

Member end actions:

{ } { } [ ]{ } { }M MF MJ J MQ QA A B A B A⎡ ⎤= + + ⎣ ⎦

Member end actions:

{ } { } [ ]{ } { }M MF MJ J MQ Q⎡ ⎤⎣ ⎦

1 1 23PL L L− − − −⎧ ⎫ ⎡ ⎤ ⎡ ⎤

{ }

1 1 21 1 1 00 1 2 0

33

93

2 9 3M

PLPL PPL

L LLPLA

PL

− − − −⎧ ⎫ ⎡ ⎤ ⎡ ⎤⎪ ⎪ ⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥⎧ ⎫⎪ ⎪ ⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥= + +⎨ ⎬ ⎨ ⎬⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥⎩ ⎭⎪ ⎪

− ⎧ ⎫⎨ ⎬⎩ ⎭0 1 2 09

0 1 0 02 9 32 9PL PP

LL

− −⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥⎩ ⎭⎪ ⎪ ⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥⎪ ⎪⎩ ⎭ ⎣ ⎦ ⎣ ⎦

−⎩ ⎭−

3 3 33 3 3 3

3PLPL PL PLPL PL PL PL

⎧ ⎫ ⎧ ⎫ ⎧ ⎫ ⎧ ⎫⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪

−− − −3 3 32 9 2 9 32 9 9 0

3

23

0

PL PL PLPL PL PLPL PL

PLPL

⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪= + + =⎨ ⎬ ⎨ ⎬ ⎨ ⎬ ⎨ ⎬⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪⎩

− −−

⎭ ⎩

⎭ ⎩ ⎭ ⎩ ⎭−

Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN

2 9 9 02 0PL PL⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪⎩ ⎭ ⎩ ⎭ ⎩ ⎭ ⎩ ⎭−

Page 18: Module1 flexibility-2-problems- rajesh sir

Reactions other than redundants:

{ } { } [ ]{ } { }R RC RJ J RQ QA A B A B A⎡ ⎤= − + + ⎣ ⎦

Reactions other than redundants:

{ }A represents combined joint loads (actual and { }RCA represents combined joint loads (actual and equivalent) applied directly to the supports.

{ }2 0 0 1 1 1

1 1 2 2933R

PPLA PL L L

PP

−⎧ ⎫ − −⎧ ⎫⎡ ⎤ ⎡ ⎤⎪ ⎪= − + +⎨ ⎬ ⎨ ⎬⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥⎩ ⎭⎣ ⎦ ⎣ ⎦⎪

⎧ ⎫⎨

⎪⎬

⎩ ⎭{ }

1 1 2 293

3L L P⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥− − − −− ⎩ ⎭⎣ ⎦ ⎣ ⎦⎪ ⎪⎩ ⎭−⎩ ⎭

22 0 0PPL PL PL

PPL

⎧ ⎫ ⎧ ⎫ ⎧ ⎫⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪= + + =⎨ ⎬ ⎨ ⎬ ⎨ ⎬⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪

⎧ ⎫⎪ ⎪⎨ ⎬⎪ ⎪⎪ ⎪

Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN

183 3 3 3

−⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪⎩⎪ ⎪⎩ ⎩ ⎭ ⎩ ⎭ ⎭⎭

Page 19: Module1 flexibility-2-problems- rajesh sir

•Problem 2: (Same problem as above, with a different choice of member end actions)

Choose reactions at B and C as redundants

Static indeterminacy = 2

Choose reactions at B and C as redundants

Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN

19Released structure

Page 20: Module1 flexibility-2-problems- rajesh sir

Fixed end actions

Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN

20Equivalent joint loads

Page 21: Module1 flexibility-2-problems- rajesh sir

2MA

A B

4MA

LB C

1MAL B

3MAL

Member end actions considered

Hence member flexibility matrix,

3 2L LF F

⎡ ⎤⎢ ⎥⎡ ⎤[ ] 11 12

221 22

3 2M MMi

M M

F F EI EIFF F L L

⎢ ⎥⎡ ⎤⎢ ⎥= =⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥⎣ ⎦⎢ ⎥

Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN

2EI EI⎢ ⎥⎣ ⎦

Page 22: Module1 flexibility-2-problems- rajesh sir

3 2L L⎡ ⎤

[ ]1 2

6 4 ;M

L LEI EIFL L

⎡ ⎤⎢ ⎥

= ⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥

Member1:

4 2EI EI⎢ ⎥⎣ ⎦

⎡ ⎤

[ ]

3 2

2 2

3 2M

L LEI EIFL L

⎡ ⎤⎢ ⎥

= ⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥

Member2: [ ]2 2

2

M L LEI EI

⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥⎣ ⎦

Unassembled flexibility matrix 22 3 0 0L L⎡ ⎤⎢ ⎥

[ ] 2

3 6 0 012 0 0 4 6M

LLFEI L L

⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥=⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥

Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN

0 0 6 12L⎢ ⎥⎣ ⎦

Page 23: Module1 flexibility-2-problems- rajesh sir

To find [BMS] and [BRS] matrices:

[ ] [ ]B b d i d

To find [BMS] and [BRS] matrices:

[ ]MSB [ ]RSBand are member end actions and support reactions in the released structure when it is subjected to unit loads corresponding to joint actions and redundantsunit loads corresponding to joint actions and redundantsseparately.

are found from the released structure

when it is subjected to [ ]MSB [ ]RSB

1 2 1 21, 1, 1, 1J J Q QA A A A= = = =i.e., and

when it is subjected to 1 2 1 2, , ,J J Q Q

separately.

Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN

23

Page 24: Module1 flexibility-2-problems- rajesh sir

1 1JA =

A B C1

A B C0

2 1MLA =14 0MLA =

1

01 0MLA = 3 0MLA =

2 1JA =

1

1ML

A B C1

01 1

0

1

Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN

000

Page 25: Module1 flexibility-2-problems- rajesh sir

L A B C

1

LL L

1 1QA =

A B C

0 0L

1 01

A B C2L

2 1QA =1L 0L 0

1

2L

Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN

1 11

Page 26: Module1 flexibility-2-problems- rajesh sir

AJ1 AJ2 AQ1 AQ2=1 =1 =1 =1

0 0 1 11 1 0 L⎡ ⎤⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥

=1 =1 =1 =1

[ ] [ ] 1 1 00 0 0 10 1 0 0

M S M J M Q

LB B B ⎢ ⎥⎡ ⎤⎡ ⎤= =⎣ ⎦⎣ ⎦ ⎢ ⎥

⎢ ⎥⎣ ⎦0 1 0 0⎣ ⎦

[ ] [ ] 0 0 1 1B B B

− −⎡ ⎤⎡ ⎤⎡ ⎤= = ⎢ ⎥⎣ ⎦⎣ ⎦[ ] [ ]

1 1 2RS RJ RQB B BL L

⎡ ⎤⎡ ⎤= = ⎢ ⎥⎣ ⎦⎣ ⎦ − − − −⎣ ⎦

[ ] [ ] [ ][ ]TS MS M MSF B F B=[ ] [ ] [ ][ ]S MS M MS

20 1 0 0 0 0 1 12 3 0 0L L⎡ ⎤⎡ ⎤ ⎡ ⎤⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥

2

0 1 0 1 1 1 03 6 0 01 0 0 0 0 0 0 112 0 0 4 6

LLLEI L L

⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥=⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥

Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN

261 1 0 0 1 0 00 0 6 12L L⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥⎣ ⎦ ⎣ ⎦⎣ ⎦

Page 27: Module1 flexibility-2-problems- rajesh sir

2 20 1 0 0 3 3 2 50 1 0 1 6 6 3 9

L L L LL LL

⎡ ⎤⎡ ⎤⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥

21 0 0 0 12 0 6 0 41 1 0 0 12 0 6

EI L LL L

⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥=⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥

⎣ ⎦ ⎣ ⎦⎣ ⎦ ⎣ ⎦

6 6 3 9L L⎡ ⎤⎢ ⎥ [ ]F F⎡ ⎤⎡ ⎤⎣ ⎦

2 2

6 18 3 153 3 2 512

L LLL L L LEI

⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥=⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥

[ ]JJ JQ

QJ QQ

F F

F F

⎡ ⎤⎡ ⎤⎣ ⎦⎢ ⎥=⎢ ⎥⎡ ⎤ ⎡ ⎤⎣ ⎦ ⎣ ⎦⎣ ⎦

2 29 15 5 18L L L L⎢ ⎥⎣ ⎦

⎣ ⎦ ⎣ ⎦⎣ ⎦

Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN

Page 28: Module1 flexibility-2-problems- rajesh sir

Redundants

{ } { } { }1

Q QQ Q QJ JA F D F A−⎡ ⎤⎡ ⎤ ⎡ ⎤= −⎣ ⎦ ⎣ ⎦⎣ ⎦{ } { } { }Q QQ Q QJ J⎣ ⎦ ⎣ ⎦⎣ ⎦

{ }QD is a null matrix{ } { }1−

⎡ ⎤ ⎡ ⎤{ }

1−⎡ ⎤ ⎡ ⎤

{ } { }Q QQ QJ JA F F A⎡ ⎤ ⎡ ⎤∴ = −⎣ ⎦ ⎣ ⎦

13 3 2 2

3 3 2 2

2 5 3 3112 12 12 1229

L L L LPLEI EI EI EI

−⎡ ⎤ ⎡ ⎤⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥ ⎧ ⎫⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥= − ⎨ ⎬⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥ ⎩ ⎭3 3 2 2 295 18 9 1512 12 12 12

L L L LEI EI EI EI

⎨ ⎬⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥ ⎩ ⎭⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥⎣ ⎦ ⎣ ⎦

18 5 1 1 1 18 5 3PL P− −⎡ ⎤ ⎡ ⎤ ⎧ ⎫ ⎡ ⎤ ⎧ ⎫− −= =⎨ ⎬ ⎨ ⎬⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥

Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN

285 2 3 5 2 5 2 1333 33L ⎨ ⎬ ⎨ ⎬⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥− −⎣ ⎦ ⎣ ⎦ ⎩ ⎭ ⎣ ⎦ ⎩ ⎭

Page 29: Module1 flexibility-2-problems- rajesh sir

3P⎧ ⎫{ } 33Q

PP

A ⎧−

=⎫

⎨ ⎬⎩ ⎭

The final values of redundants are obtained by including y gactual or equivalent joint loads applied directly to the supports.

Th { } { } { } 3 10 33P P PA A A ⎧ ⎫ ⎧ ⎫

⎨ ⎬ ⎨ ⎬⎧ ⎫⎨ ⎬Thus, { } { } { } 3 2 3Q QC QFINAL

A A AP P P

⎧ ⎫ ⎧ ⎫= − + = + =⎨ ⎬ ⎨ ⎬

⎩ ⎭

⎧ ⎫⎨ ⎬−⎩ ⎩⎭ ⎭

Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN

29

Page 30: Module1 flexibility-2-problems- rajesh sir

Joint displacements

{ } [ ]{ } { }J JJ J JQ QD F A F A⎡ ⎤= + ⎣ ⎦

Joint displacements

{ } [ ]{ } { }J JJ J JQ Q⎣ ⎦

{ }6 6 1 3 96 18 2 3 1512 9 12

33J

L LL PL LDL LEI E

PI P

⎡ ⎤ ⎧ ⎫ ⎡ ⎤= +⎨

⎧ ⎫⎨ ⎬−⎬⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥

⎣ ⎦ ⎩ ⎦ ⎩⎭ ⎣ ⎭⎣ ⎦ ⎩ ⎦ ⎩⎭ ⎣ ⎭

{ }2 2 2 0

113 27 41 12 88J

PL PLDEI EI

PLEI

⎧ ⎫ ⎧ ⎫= − =⎨ ⎬

⎧⎨ ⎬

⎩ ⎭ ⎩ ⎭

⎫⎨ ⎬⎩ ⎭117 41 12 88EI EI EI⎩ ⎭ ⎩ ⎭ ⎩ ⎭

Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN

30

Page 31: Module1 flexibility-2-problems- rajesh sir

Member end actions

{ } { } [ ]{ } { }M MF MJ J MQ QA A B A B A⎡ ⎤= + + ⎣ ⎦{ }⎣ ⎦

2 0 0 1 1P⎧ ⎫ ⎡ ⎤ ⎡ ⎤

{ }

2 0 0 1 13 1 1 1 0

0 0 2 0 1339M

PPL LPLAP

PP

⎧ ⎫ ⎡ ⎤ ⎡ ⎤⎪ ⎪ ⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥− ⎧ ⎫⎪ ⎪ ⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥= + +⎨ ⎬ ⎨ ⎬⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥⎩ ⎭⎪ ⎪

⎧ ⎫⎨ ⎬−⎩ ⎭0 0 2 0 1 39

2 9 0 1 0 0P PPL

⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥⎩ ⎭⎪ ⎪ ⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥⎪ ⎪−⎩ ⎭ ⎣ ⎦ ⎣ ⎦⎩ ⎭

2 0 03 3 3

23

PPL PL PL

PPL

⎧ ⎫ ⎧ ⎫ ⎧ ⎫⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪

⎧ ⎫⎪ ⎪⎪ ⎪3 3 3

0 33

2 32 9 2 9 0 0

PL PL PLP PPL PL

PLP

− −⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪= + + =⎨ ⎬ ⎨ ⎬ ⎨ ⎬⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪

−⎪ ⎪⎨ ⎬⎪ ⎪⎪⎩ ⎭ ⎩ ⎭ ⎩⎩ ⎭⎭ ⎪

Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN

31

2 9 2 9 0 0PL PL⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪− ⎪⎩ ⎭ ⎩ ⎭ ⎩⎩ ⎭⎭ ⎪

Page 32: Module1 flexibility-2-problems- rajesh sir

Reactions other than redundants

{ } { } [ ]{ } { }A A B A B A⎡ ⎤= − + + ⎣ ⎦{ } { } [ ]{ } { }R RC RJ J RQ QA A B A B A⎡ ⎤= + + ⎣ ⎦

{ }A represents combined joint loads (actual and { }RCA represents combined joint loads (actual and equivalent) applied directly to the supports.

{ }2 0 0 1 1 1 3P PLA

P− − −⎧ ⎫ ⎡ ⎤ ⎧ ⎫ ⎡ ⎤= − + +⎨ ⎬ ⎨ ⎬⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥

⎧ ⎫⎨ ⎬{ }

3 1 1 2 29 3RAPL L L P

= + +⎨ ⎬ ⎨ ⎬⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥− − − − −⎩ ⎭ ⎣ ⎦ ⎩ ⎭ ⎣ −⎦⎨ ⎬⎩ ⎭

{ }2

32 0 0

3 3 3R

PP

PA

PL PL PL L⎧ ⎫ ⎧ ⎫ ⎧ ⎫

= + + =⎨ ⎬ ⎨ ⎬ ⎨ ⎬−⎩ ⎭

⎧ ⎫⎨

⎩ ⎩ ⎭ ⎩⎭⎬⎭

Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN

32

33 3 3 PPL PL PL L⎩ ⎭ ⎩ ⎩ ⎭ ⎩⎭ ⎭

Page 33: Module1 flexibility-2-problems- rajesh sir

•Problem 3:

A D

120 kN40 kN/m 20 kN/mA

B C D4 m12 m 12 m 12 m

Static indeterminacy = 2Choose reactions at C and D as redundants

A D

120 kN40 kN/m 20 kN/mA

B C D4 m12 m 12 m 12 m

Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN

33

Released structure

Page 34: Module1 flexibility-2-problems- rajesh sir

120 kN40 kN/m 20 kN/mA

B C D

/ 20 kN/m

4 m12 m 12 m 12 m

2wl 48012wl

= 480 240 240

wl 240 120 120240

2wl

= 240 120 120

213.33 106 673.33 106.67

Fixed end actions

Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN

3488.89 31.11Fixed end actions

Page 35: Module1 flexibility-2-problems- rajesh sir

480 266 67 133.33 240

A B C D

480 266.67

240240 88.89

328 89+

=120 31.11

151 11+ 120328.89= 151.11=

Equivalent joint loads

A

1JA 2JA3JA

4JA

AB C D

A AA A

Structure with redundants and other reactions

1QA 2QA1RA 2RA

Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN

35and joint actions

Page 36: Module1 flexibility-2-problems- rajesh sir

Member flexibility matrix

11 12 3 6M M

L LF F EI EI

−⎡ ⎤⎢ ⎥⎡ ⎤[ ] 11 12

21 22

3 6

6 3

M MMi

M M

F F EI EIFF F L L

EI EI

⎢ ⎥⎡ ⎤= = ⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥ −⎣ ⎦ ⎢ ⎥

⎢ ⎥⎣ ⎦6 3EI EI⎢ ⎥⎣ ⎦

Unassembled flexibility matrix

2 1 0 0 0 01 2 0 0 0 0

−⎡ ⎤⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥

[ ]

1 2 0 0 0 00 0 2 1 0 020 0 1 2 0 0MF

EI

−⎢ ⎥−⎢ ⎥

= ⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥0 0 1 2 0 0

0 0 0 0 2 10 0 0 0 1 2

EI −⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥−⎢ ⎥⎣ ⎦

Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN

36

0 0 0 0 1 2−⎣ ⎦

Page 37: Module1 flexibility-2-problems- rajesh sir

To find [BMS] and [BRS] matrices:

are found from the released structure when [ ]MSB [ ]RSB1 1 1 1 1 1A A A A A A

andit is subjected to 1 2 3 4 1 21, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1J J J J Q QA A A A A A= = = = = =

separately. p y

Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN

37

Page 38: Module1 flexibility-2-problems- rajesh sir

1 1JA =

1A B C D112

1 0 0 0 0 0

1212

2 1JA =

A B C D1

12

112

0 1 0 0 0 0

Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN

38

Page 39: Module1 flexibility-2-problems- rajesh sir

3 1JA =

A B C D1

12

112

0 1 1− 1 0 0

1212

1A 4 1JA =

A B DA B C D1

12

112

0 1 1− 1 1− 1

Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN

Page 40: Module1 flexibility-2-problems- rajesh sir

1 1QA =A B C D

21

0 12 12− 0 0 0

1 1QA

A B C D2 32

2 1QA =

0 24 24− 12 12− 0

Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN

Page 41: Module1 flexibility-2-problems- rajesh sir

Hence action transformation matrix Hence, action transformation matrix,

AJ1 AJ2 AJ3 AJ4 AQ1 AQ21 1 1 1 1 1

1 0 0 0 0 0⎡ ⎤⎢ ⎥

=1 =1 =1 =1 =1 =1

[ ] [ ]

0 1 1 1 12 240 0 1 1 12 24

B B B

⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥− − − −

⎡ ⎤⎡ ⎤= = ⎢ ⎥⎣ ⎦⎣ ⎦[ ] [ ]0 0 1 1 0 120 0 0 1 0 12

MS MJ MQB B B⎡ ⎤⎡ ⎤= = ⎢ ⎥⎣ ⎦⎣ ⎦⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥− −⎢ ⎥0 0 0 1 0 0⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥⎣ ⎦

Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN

Page 42: Module1 flexibility-2-problems- rajesh sir

AB C DB C

1RA 2RA

AJ1 AJ2 AJ3 AJ4 AQ1 AQ21 1 1 1 1 1

[ ] [ ] 1 1 1 1 12 241RS RJ RQB B B

⎡ ⎤⎡ ⎤⎡ ⎤= = ⎢ ⎥⎣ ⎦⎣ ⎦

=1 =1 =1 =1 =1 =1

[ ] [ ]1 1 1 1 24 3612RS RJ RQB B B⎡ ⎤⎡ ⎤ ⎢ ⎥⎣ ⎦⎣ ⎦ − − − − − −⎣ ⎦

Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN

42

Page 43: Module1 flexibility-2-problems- rajesh sir

Redundants

{ }QD∵ is a null matrix{ } { }1

Q QQ QJ JA F F A−

⎡ ⎤ ⎡ ⎤= − ⎣ ⎦ ⎣ ⎦

T⎡ ⎤ ⎡ ⎤ ⎡ ⎤

576 12962 ⎡ ⎤

{ }Q QQ Q⎣ ⎦ ⎣ ⎦

[ ]T

QQ MQ M MQF B F B⎡ ⎤ ⎡ ⎤ ⎡ ⎤=⎣ ⎦ ⎣ ⎦ ⎣ ⎦576 12962

1296 3456EI⎡ ⎤

= ⎢ ⎥⎣ ⎦

[ ][ ]T

QJ MQ M MJF B F B⎡ ⎤ ⎡ ⎤=⎣ ⎦ ⎣ ⎦12 24 60 60224 48 156 192EI

−⎡ ⎤= ⎢ ⎥−⎣ ⎦⎣ ⎦ ⎣ ⎦ 24 48 156 192EI ⎣ ⎦

480−⎧ ⎫⎪ ⎪

{ }1

576 1296 12 24 60 60 266.672 21296 3456 24 48 156 192 133.33QA

EI EI

− ⎪ ⎪−⎛ ⎞⎡ ⎤ ⎡ ⎤ ⎪ ⎪∴ = − ⎨ ⎬⎜ ⎟⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥− −⎣ ⎦ ⎣ ⎦⎝ ⎠ ⎪ ⎪

Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN

240⎣ ⎦ ⎣ ⎦⎝ ⎠ ⎪ ⎪

⎪ ⎪⎩ ⎭

Page 44: Module1 flexibility-2-problems- rajesh sir

{ } 3456 1296 18560.2811296 576 49600 68311040QA

−⎡ ⎤ ⎧ ⎫−= ⎨ ⎬⎢ ⎥

⎣ ⎦ ⎩ ⎭{ } 1296 576 49600.68311040 −⎣ ⎦ ⎩ ⎭

{ } 138153.614515868 8

0.431104

4420 14 5186QA ⎧ ⎫

⎨ ⎬−−⎧ ⎫−

= =⎨ ⎬⎩⎩ ⎭ ⎭4515868.8311040 14.5186⎩⎩ ⎭ ⎭

{ } { } { } 151.11 0.4442 151.55120 14 5186 105 48Q QC QFINAL

A A A−⎧ ⎫ ⎧ ⎫ ⎧ ⎫

∴ = − + = − + =⎨ ⎬ ⎨ ⎬ ⎨ ⎬− −⎩ ⎭ ⎩ ⎭ ⎩ ⎭120 14.5186 105.48FINAL − −⎩ ⎭ ⎩ ⎭ ⎩ ⎭

Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN

Page 45: Module1 flexibility-2-problems- rajesh sir

Member end actions

{ } { } [ ]{ } { }A A B A B A⎡ ⎤= + + ⎣ ⎦

Member end actions

{ } { } [ ]{ } { }M MF MJ J MQ QA A B A B A⎡ ⎤= + + ⎣ ⎦

480 1 0 0 0 0 0480 0 1 1 1 480 12 24

⎧ ⎫ ⎡ ⎤ ⎡ ⎤⎪ ⎪ ⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥− −⎧ ⎫⎪ ⎪ ⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥

0449

⎧ ⎫⎪ ⎪−⎪ ⎪480 0 1 1 1 480 12 24

213.33 0 0 1 1 266.67 12 24 0.4442106 67 0 0 1 1 133 33 0 12 14 5186

⎧ ⎫⎪ ⎪ ⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥⎪ ⎪− − − −⎪ ⎪ ⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥⎧ ⎫⎪ ⎪= + +⎨ ⎬ ⎨ ⎬ ⎨ ⎬⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥⎩ ⎭⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥

449449174

⎪ ⎪⎪ ⎪⎨ ⎬⎪ ⎪

=106.67 0 0 1 1 133.33 0 12 14.5186240 0 0 0 1 240 0 12240 0 0 0 1 0 0

− − −⎩ ⎭⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥− −⎩ ⎭⎪ ⎪ ⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥⎩ ⎭ ⎣ ⎦ ⎣ ⎦

174174

0

−⎪ ⎪⎪ ⎪⎪⎩ ⎭

⎪240 0 0 0 1 0 0

⎪ ⎪ ⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥−⎩ ⎭ ⎣ ⎦ ⎣ ⎦ 0⎩ ⎭

Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN

45

Page 46: Module1 flexibility-2-problems- rajesh sir

Reactions other than redundants

{ } { } [ ]{ } { }R RC RJ J RQ QA A B A B A⎡ ⎤= − + + ⎣ ⎦{ } { } [ ]{ } { }R RC RJ J RQ Q⎣ ⎦

480−⎧ ⎫⎪ ⎪240 1 1 1 1 266.67 12 24 0.44421 1

328.89 1 1 1 1 133.33 24 36 14.518612 12

⎪ ⎪−⎧ ⎫ ⎡ ⎤ ⎡ ⎤⎧ ⎫⎪ ⎪=− + +⎨ ⎬ ⎨ ⎬ ⎨ ⎬⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥− − − − − − − − −⎩ ⎭ ⎣ ⎦ ⎣ ⎦⎩ ⎭⎪ ⎪3 8.89 33.33 36 .5 8612 12240

⎩ ⎭ ⎣ ⎦ ⎣ ⎦⎩ ⎭⎪ ⎪⎪ ⎪⎩ ⎭

202.518380 447⎧

=⎫

⎨ ⎬⎩ ⎭380.447⎩ ⎭

Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN

46

Page 47: Module1 flexibility-2-problems- rajesh sir

Joint displacements

{ } [ ]{ } { }J JJ J JQ QD F A F A⎡ ⎤= + ⎣ ⎦

J p

2 1 1 1− − −⎡ ⎤⎢ ⎥

[ ] [ ] [ ][ ]TJJ MJ M MJF B F B=

1 2 2 221 2 8 8EI

⎢ ⎥−⎢ ⎥=−⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥1 2 8 14⎢ ⎥−⎣ ⎦

[ ] [ ]TF B F B⎡ ⎤ ⎡ ⎤⎣ ⎦ ⎣ ⎦

12 2424 482− −⎡ ⎤⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥[ ] [ ]JQ MJ M MQF B F B⎡ ⎤ ⎡ ⎤=⎣ ⎦ ⎣ ⎦ 60 156

60 192EI

⎢ ⎥=⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥⎣ ⎦

Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN

47

60 192⎣ ⎦

Page 48: Module1 flexibility-2-problems- rajesh sir

⎧ ⎫⎡ ⎤ ⎡ ⎤

{ }

2 1 1 1 480 12 241 2 2 2 266.67 24 48 0.44422 2

JD

− − − − − −⎧ ⎫⎡ ⎤ ⎡ ⎤⎪ ⎪⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥− ⎧ ⎫⎪ ⎪⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥= +⎨ ⎬ ⎨ ⎬⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥

{ }1 2 8 8 133.33 60 156 14.51861 2 8 14 240 60 192

JDEI EI

+⎨ ⎬ ⎨ ⎬− − −⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥ ⎩ ⎭⎪ ⎪⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥⎪ ⎪− ⎩ ⎭⎣ ⎦ ⎣ ⎦

990−⎧ ⎫⎪ ⎪5402

371EI

⎪ ⎪⎪ ⎪⎨ ⎬−⎪⎪

=⎪⎪545.378⎪ ⎪⎩ ⎭

Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN

Page 49: Module1 flexibility-2-problems- rajesh sir

Alternatively, if the entire [Fs] matrix is assembled at a time,

[ ] [ ] [ ][ ]TS MS M MSF B F B=

⎡ ⎤1 0 0 0 0 00 1 0 0 0 00 1 1 1 0 0

⎡ ⎤⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥0 1 1 1 0 00 1 1 1 1 10 12 12 0 0 0

−⎢ ⎥= ⎢ ⎥− −⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥−0 12 12 0 0 00 24 24 12 12 0

2 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0

⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥− −⎣ ⎦

− ⎡ ⎤⎡ ⎤2 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 01 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 12 24

0 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 12 242

⎡ ⎤⎡ ⎤⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥− ⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥− − − − −⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥0 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 12

0 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 1 0 12EI

× ⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥− ⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥− − −⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥

Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN

0 0 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 1 0 0⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥− ⎢ ⎥⎣ ⎦ ⎣ ⎦

Page 50: Module1 flexibility-2-problems- rajesh sir

1 0 0 0 0 0 2 1 1 1 1 2 2 40 1 0 0 0 0 1 2 2 2 2 4 4 80 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 3 3 2 4 6 02

− − − − −⎡ ⎤ ⎡ ⎤⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥−⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 3 3 2 4 6 02

0 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 3 3 1 2 4 80 1 2 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 2 4

E I− − − − −⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥

= ⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥− −⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥− − −0 1 2 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 2 4

0 2 4 2 4 1 2 1 2 0 0 0 0 3 0 1 2⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥− −⎣ ⎦ ⎣ ⎦

2 1 1 1 12 241 2 2 2 24 48

− − − − −⎡ ⎤⎢ ⎥−⎢ ⎥ [ ]

1 2 2 2 24 481 2 8 8 60 15621 2 8 14 60 192

JJ JQF F

EI F F

⎢ ⎥⎡ ⎤⎡ ⎤−⎢ ⎥ ⎣ ⎦⎢ ⎥= =⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥⎡ ⎤ ⎡ ⎤⎢ ⎥1 2 8 14 60 192

12 24 60 60 576 129624 48 156 192 1296 3456

QJ QQEI F F− ⎢ ⎥⎡ ⎤ ⎡ ⎤⎢ ⎥ ⎣ ⎦ ⎣ ⎦⎣ ⎦

⎢ ⎥−⎢ ⎥⎣ ⎦

Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN

50

24 48 156 192 1296 3456⎢ ⎥−⎣ ⎦

Page 51: Module1 flexibility-2-problems- rajesh sir

•Problem 4:

Static indeterminacy = 1

Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN

51Choose horizontal reaction at D as redundant

Page 52: Module1 flexibility-2-problems- rajesh sir

1RA 1R

2RA3RA

Redundants [AQ] and reactions other than redundants [AR]

3R

Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN

Redundants [AQ] and reactions other than redundants [AR]

Page 53: Module1 flexibility-2-problems- rajesh sir

427PL27

Fixed end actions

Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN

53

Page 54: Module1 flexibility-2-problems- rajesh sir

Combined (equivalent +actual) joint loads

Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN

Page 55: Module1 flexibility-2-problems- rajesh sir

Member flexibility matrix

3 6L L

F F EI EI−⎡ ⎤

⎢ ⎥⎡ ⎤[ ] 11 12

21 22

3 6

6 3

M MMi

M M

F F EI EIFF F L L

EI EI

⎢ ⎥⎡ ⎤= = ⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥ −⎣ ⎦ ⎢ ⎥

⎢ ⎥⎣ ⎦6 3EI EI⎢ ⎥⎣ ⎦

Unassembled flexibility matrix 2 1 0 0 0 01 2 0 0 0 0

−⎡ ⎤⎢ ⎥−⎢ ⎥

[ ]

1 2 0 0 0 00 0 4 2 0 00 0 2 4 0 012M

LFEI

⎢ ⎥−⎢ ⎥

= ⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥

[ ]0 0 2 4 0 0120 0 0 0 2 1

EI −⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥−⎢ ⎥

Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN

550 0 0 0 1 2⎢ ⎥−⎣ ⎦

Page 56: Module1 flexibility-2-problems- rajesh sir

Joint displacements R d d tRedundantsReactions other than redundants

are member end actions found from the released structure when it is subjected to[ ]MSB [ ]RSBand

Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN

56

structure when it is subjected to

1 2 3 4 5 11, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1J J J J J QA A A A A A= = = = = = separately.

Page 57: Module1 flexibility-2-problems- rajesh sir

L/2 0

1A

L/20

2 1JA =

1

0 0

1/21/2

Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN

57

Page 58: Module1 flexibility-2-problems- rajesh sir

0 00

1

3 1JA = 00

0

10

4 1JA =0

1

0 0 4 1JA

01/L 1/L

0

0

/ 1/L

00

Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN

58

1/L 1/L

Page 59: Module1 flexibility-2-problems- rajesh sir

00

0

1

1

L/2 L/2

L/2

L/2

0

1 1 1QA =

1A

0 11 1Q

5 1JA =1/L

1/L

0 0

00

Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN

59

Page 60: Module1 flexibility-2-problems- rajesh sir

AJ1 AJ2 AJ3 AJ4 AJ5 AQ1=1 =1 =1 =1 =1 =1

1 0 0 0 0 01 2 0 0 0 2L L

⎡ ⎤⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥

=1 =1 =1 =1 =1 =1

[ ] [ ]

1 2 0 0 0 21 2 1 0 0 2

L LL L

B B B

⎢ ⎥−⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥− −

⎡ ⎤⎡ ⎤= = ⎢ ⎥⎣ ⎦⎣ ⎦[ ] [ ]0 0 0 1 1 20 0 0 0 1 2

MS MJ MQB B BLL

⎡ ⎤⎡ ⎤= = ⎢ ⎥⎣ ⎦⎣ ⎦⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥− −⎢ ⎥

0 0 0 0 1 0⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥⎣ ⎦

⎡ ⎤

AJ1 AJ2 AJ3 AJ4 AJ5 AQ1=1 =1 =1 =1 =1 =1

[ ] [ ]0 1 0 0 0 1

1 1 2 1 1 1 0RS RJ RQB B B L L L L− −⎡ ⎤

⎢ ⎥⎡ ⎤⎡ ⎤= = −⎣ ⎦⎣ ⎦ ⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥

Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN

1 1 2 1 1 1 0L L L L⎢ ⎥− − − −⎣ ⎦

Page 61: Module1 flexibility-2-problems- rajesh sir

Redundants:

{ }QD∵ is a null matrix{ } { }1

Q QQ QJ JA F F A−

⎡ ⎤ ⎡ ⎤= − ⎣ ⎦ ⎣ ⎦

T3L[ ]T

QQ MQ M MQF B F B⎡ ⎤ ⎡ ⎤ ⎡ ⎤=⎣ ⎦ ⎣ ⎦ ⎣ ⎦ 3LE I

=

[ ][ ]T

QJ MQ M MJF B F B⎡ ⎤ ⎡ ⎤=⎣ ⎦ ⎣ ⎦

29 2 2 3 3 9 2L L L L L L⎡ ⎤= − −⎣ ⎦

Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN

9 2 2 3 3 9 212

L L L L LEI

⎡ ⎤⎣ ⎦

Page 62: Module1 flexibility-2-problems- rajesh sir

0⎧ ⎫

{ } 2

02

3 9 2 2 3 3 9 2 4 27P

EI LA L L L L L PL

⎧ ⎫⎪ ⎪⎪ ⎪− ⎪ ⎪⎡ ⎤∴ = ⎨ ⎬⎣ ⎦{ } 3 9 2 2 3 3 9 2 4 27

122 27

0

QA L L L L L PLL EI

PL⎡ ⎤∴ = − − −⎨ ⎬⎣ ⎦

⎪ ⎪⎪ ⎪⎪ ⎪⎩ ⎭0⎪ ⎪⎩ ⎭

512

P−=

12

{ } { } { } 5 50Q QC QPA A A P⎛ ⎞= − + = + =⎟

−−⎜⎝ ⎠

{ } { } { } 120

12Q QC QFINALA A A+ + ⎟⎜

⎝ ⎠

Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN

Page 63: Module1 flexibility-2-problems- rajesh sir

Member end actions

{ } { } [ ]{ } { }A A B A B A⎡ ⎤= + + ⎣ ⎦

Member end actions

{ } { } [ ]{ } { }M MF MJ J MQ QA A B A B A⎡ ⎤= + + ⎣ ⎦

0 1 0 0 0 0 00

0 1 2 0 0 0 22

L LP

⎧ ⎫ ⎡ ⎤ ⎡ ⎤⎧ ⎫⎪ ⎪ ⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥− ⎪ ⎪⎪ ⎪ ⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥⎪ ⎪2

4 27 1 2 1 0 0 2 54 272 27 0 0 0 1 1 2 12

2 27

PPL L L PPLPL L

PL

⎪ ⎪ ⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥⎪ ⎪− −⎪ ⎪ ⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥ −⎪ ⎪ ⎛ ⎞= + +−⎨ ⎬ ⎨ ⎬⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥ ⎜ ⎟− ⎝ ⎠⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥

⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪2 270 0 0 0 0 1 2

00 0 0 0 0 1 0

PLL

⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥− −⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥⎩ ⎭⎩ ⎭ ⎣ ⎦ ⎣ ⎦

Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN

63

Page 64: Module1 flexibility-2-problems- rajesh sir

0 0 0⎧ ⎫ ⎧ ⎫ ⎡ ⎤0⎧ ⎫

⎪ ⎪0 0 00 4 1

4 27 43 108 1 5PL

PL PL PL

⎧ ⎫ ⎧ ⎫ ⎡ ⎤⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎢ ⎥⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎢ ⎥⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎢ ⎥ ⎛ ⎞

2424

PLPL

⎪ ⎪⎪ ⎪−⎪ ⎪4 27 43 108 1 5

2 27 2 27 1 240 0 1

PL PL PLPL PL

− −⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎢ ⎥ −⎛ ⎞= + +⎨ ⎬ ⎨ ⎬ ⎢ ⎥ ⎜ ⎟− ⎝ ⎠⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎢ ⎥⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎢ ⎥

245 24

5 24

PLPL

PL

⎪ ⎪⎨ ⎬−⎪ ⎪⎪ ⎪

=

0 0 10 0 0

⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎢ ⎥−⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎢ ⎥⎩ ⎭ ⎩ ⎭ ⎣ ⎦

5 240

PL⎪ ⎪⎪ ⎪⎩ ⎭

Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN

Page 65: Module1 flexibility-2-problems- rajesh sir

Reactions other than redundants

{ } { } [ ]{ } { }R RC RJ J RQ QA A B A B A⎡ ⎤= − + + ⎣ ⎦

Reactions other than redundants

{ } { } [ ]{ } { }R RC RJ J RQ QA A B A B A⎡ ⎤+ + ⎣ ⎦0

0 0 1 0 0 0 12P⎧ ⎫⎪ ⎪⎧ ⎫ ⎧ ⎫⎡ ⎤0 0 1 0 0 0 12

520 1 1 2 1 1 1 04 2727 12

7 1 1 2 1 1 1 02 27

PP PL L L L PL

L L L L PL

⎪ ⎪− −⎧ ⎫ ⎧ ⎫⎡ ⎤⎪ ⎪− −⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪⎛ ⎞⎢ ⎥= − + − +−⎨ ⎬ ⎨ ⎬ ⎨ ⎬⎜ ⎟⎢ ⎥ ⎝ ⎠⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪⎢ ⎥⎩ ⎭ ⎩ ⎭⎣ ⎦7 1 1 2 1 1 1 02 270

L L L L PL⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪− − − − −⎢ ⎥⎩ ⎭ ⎩ ⎭⎣ ⎦⎪ ⎪⎪ ⎪⎩ ⎭

15

12P

−⎧ ⎫⎪ ⎪⎨ ⎬=

127

⎨ ⎬⎪⎩ ⎪⎭

Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN

65

Page 66: Module1 flexibility-2-problems- rajesh sir

{ } [ ]{ } { }J JJ J JQ QD F A F A⎡ ⎤= + ⎣ ⎦Joint displacements { } [ ]{ } { }J JJ J JQ QD F A F A⎡ ⎤+ ⎣ ⎦Joint displacements

10 7 2 4 2 2L− − −⎡ ⎤

[ ] [ ] [ ][ ]TJJ MJ M MJF B F B=

2

10 7 2 4 2 27 2 3 2 24 2 4 2 2

LL L L L L

L L

⎡ ⎤⎢ ⎥− −⎢ ⎥

= − − −⎢ ⎥[ ] [ ] [ ][ ]JJ MJ M MJF B F B 4 2 4 2 212

2 2 4 42 2 4 10

LEI

LL

= ⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥− −⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥⎣ ⎦2 2 4 10L⎢ ⎥− −⎣ ⎦

9 2L⎧ ⎫

T⎡ ⎤ ⎡ ⎤

2

9 22LL

L

−⎧ ⎫⎪ ⎪⎪ ⎪⎪ ⎪[ ] [ ]T

JQ MJ M MQF B F B⎡ ⎤ ⎡ ⎤=⎣ ⎦ ⎣ ⎦ 312

3

L LEI

L

⎪ ⎪= −⎨ ⎬⎪ ⎪⎪ ⎪

Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN

669 2L

⎪ ⎪⎪ ⎪⎩ ⎭

Page 67: Module1 flexibility-2-problems- rajesh sir

{ } [ ]{ } { }D F A F A⎡ ⎤∴ = + ⎣ ⎦{ } [ ]{ } { }J JJ J JQ QD F A F A⎡ ⎤∴ = + ⎣ ⎦

2 2

10 7 2 4 2 2 0 9 27 2 3 2 2 2 2

5

L LL L L L L P L

L L P

− − − −⎧ ⎫ ⎧ ⎫⎡ ⎤⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪⎢ ⎥− − ⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪⎢ ⎥⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪⎛ ⎞54 2 4 2 2 4 27 3

12 12 122 2 4 4 2 27 3

L L PL PL LEI EI

L PL L

⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪⎢ ⎥ −⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪⎛ ⎞= +− − − − −⎢ ⎥⎨ ⎬ ⎨ ⎬⎜ ⎟⎝ ⎠⎢ ⎥⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪− −⎢ ⎥⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪

2 2 4 10 0 9 2L L⎢ ⎥⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪⎢ ⎥− − ⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪⎩ ⎭ ⎩ ⎭⎣ ⎦

2

13362L

PL

−⎧ ⎫⎪ ⎪⎪ ⎪⎪ ⎪{ }

2

1062592

34JD PL

EI

⎪ ⎪⎪ ⎪−⎨ ⎬⎪ ⎪−

=

⎪ ⎪

Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN

169−⎪⎩⎪ ⎪

⎪⎭

Page 68: Module1 flexibility-2-problems- rajesh sir

Alternatively, if the entire [Fs] matrix is assembled at a time,

[ ] [ ] [ ][ ]TS MS M MSF B F B=

y [ ]

1 0 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 01 2 0 0 0 2 1 2 0 0 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 2

T

L L L L−⎡ ⎤ ⎡ ⎤⎡ ⎤

⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥− − −⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥1 2 0 0 0 2 1 2 0 0 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 21 2 1 0 0 2 0 0 4 2 0 0 1 2 1 0 0 20 0 0 1 1 2 0 0 2 4 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 2120 0 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 1 2

L L L LL L L LL

L LEIL L

⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥− − − − −⎢ ⎥

= ⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥−⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥− − − − −0 0 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 1 2

0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 1 0L L⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥

⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥−⎢ ⎥ ⎢⎣ ⎦⎣ ⎦ ⎣ ⎦⎥

1 1 1 0 0 0 3 2 0 0 0 20 2 2 0 0 0 3 0 0 0

L LL L L L− − −⎡ ⎤ ⎡ ⎤

⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥− −⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥0 0 1 0 0 0 4 2 4 2 2 3

0 0 0 1 0 0 2 2 4 4 31 20 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 3

L LLL LE I

L

− − − −⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥= ⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥− −⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥− − −⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥

Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN

0 2 2 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 3 2L L L L L⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥− −⎣ ⎦ ⎣ ⎦

Page 69: Module1 flexibility-2-problems- rajesh sir

2 2

10 7 2 4 2 2 9 27 2 3 2 2 2

L LL L L L L L

− − − −⎡ ⎤⎢ ⎥− −⎢ ⎥ [ ]

7 2 3 2 2 24 2 4 2 2 32 2 4 4 312

JJ JQ

L L L L L LF FL LL

L LEI F F

⎢ ⎥⎡ ⎤⎡ ⎤− − − −⎢ ⎥ ⎣ ⎦⎢ ⎥= =⎢ ⎥− − ⎢ ⎥⎡ ⎤ ⎡ ⎤⎢ ⎥ ⎣ ⎦ ⎣ ⎦⎣ ⎦

2 2

2 2 4 4 3122 2 4 10 9 2

9 2 2 3 3 9 2 4

QJ QQL LEI F FL L

L L L L L L

− − ⎢ ⎥⎡ ⎤ ⎡ ⎤⎢ ⎥ ⎣ ⎦ ⎣ ⎦⎣ ⎦⎢ ⎥− −⎢ ⎥− −⎣ ⎦9 2 2 3 3 9 2 4L L L L L L− −⎣ ⎦

Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN

Page 70: Module1 flexibility-2-problems- rajesh sir

•Problem 5: 30 kN/m

50 kN

30 kN/m

4m

B C

42m

4m

D

A

Static indeterminacy = 3

Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN

70Choose 3 reactions at D as redundants

Page 71: Module1 flexibility-2-problems- rajesh sir

3QA 2QA

1QAA

2RA

A

3RA

Released structure

1RA

Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN

with redundants and other reactions

Page 72: Module1 flexibility-2-problems- rajesh sir

60 kN 60 kN40 kNm 40 kNm

60 kN 60 kN40 kNm 40 kNm

0 k50 kN

Fixed end actions

Combined (equivalent +actual) joint loads

Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN

72

actual) joint loads

Page 73: Module1 flexibility-2-problems- rajesh sir

Member flexibility matrix

11 12 3 6M M

L LF F EI EI

−⎡ ⎤⎢ ⎥⎡ ⎤[ ] 11 12

21 22

3 6

6 3

M MMi

M M

F F EI EIFF F L L

EI EI

⎢ ⎥⎡ ⎤= = ⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥ −⎣ ⎦ ⎢ ⎥

⎢ ⎥⎣ ⎦6 3EI EI⎢ ⎥⎣ ⎦

U bl d fl ibilit 4 2 0 0 0 02 4 0 0 0 0

−⎡ ⎤⎢ ⎥

Unassembled flexibility matrix

[ ]

2 4 0 0 0 00 0 4 2 0 020 0 2 4 0 06MF

EI

⎢ ⎥−⎢ ⎥−⎢ ⎥

= ⎢ ⎥[ ]0 0 2 4 0 060 0 0 0 2 10 0 0 0 1 2

M EI ⎢ ⎥−⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥−⎢ ⎥⎣ ⎦

Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN

73

0 0 0 0 1 2⎢ ⎥−⎣ ⎦

Page 74: Module1 flexibility-2-problems- rajesh sir

40A = 40A =2 40JA = 3 40JA =

1 50JA =2JD 3JD

1 50JA1JD

Joint displacements and di j i t l dcorresponding joint loads

are found from the released structure when it is subjected to 1 2 3 1 2 31, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1J J J Q Q QA A A A A A= = = = = =

t l

[ ]MSB [ ]RSBand

Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN

74

separately.

Page 75: Module1 flexibility-2-problems- rajesh sir

0 0 1 0

1A =

00

00

1 0

0 01 1JA =

2 1JA =

0 0

4 0 01−4 01−

0

0 0

Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN

75

Page 76: Module1 flexibility-2-problems- rajesh sir

1 0

1

44−

0

3 1JA =

1− 1 4− 0

3J

00 0

0

0

1A04−

0

0

01− 1 1QA =1−

Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN

Page 77: Module1 flexibility-2-problems- rajesh sir

2 2− 1−1

2− 2 11−

2 1QA = 12Q

1−

0

23 1QA =01−

0

120

Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN

Page 78: Module1 flexibility-2-problems- rajesh sir

AJ1 AJ2 AJ3 AQ1 AQ2 AQ3=1 =1 =1 =1 =1 =1 4 1 1 4 2 10 1 1 4 2 1

− − − −⎡ ⎤⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥

[ ] [ ]

0 1 1 4 2 10 0 1 4 2 10 0 1 0 2 1MS MJ MQB B B

⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥− − − −

⎡ ⎤⎡ ⎤= = ⎢ ⎥⎣ ⎦⎣ ⎦[ ] [ ]0 0 1 0 2 10 0 0 0 2 1

MS MJ MQ ⎢ ⎥⎣ ⎦⎣ ⎦⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥− −⎢ ⎥0 0 0 0 0 1⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥⎣ ⎦

A A A A A A

0 0 0 1 0 0−⎡ ⎤

AJ1 AJ2 AJ3 AQ1 AQ2 AQ3=1 =1 =1 =1 =1 =1

[ ] [ ]0 0 0 1 0 01 0 0 0 1 0

4 1 1 4 2 1RS RJ RQB B B

⎡ ⎤⎢ ⎥⎡ ⎤⎡ ⎤= = − −⎣ ⎦⎣ ⎦ ⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥

Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN

4 1 1 4 2 1⎢ ⎥− − − −⎣ ⎦

Page 79: Module1 flexibility-2-problems- rajesh sir

Redundants:

{ }QD∵ is a null matrix{ } { }1

Q QQ QJ JA F F A−

⎡ ⎤ ⎡ ⎤= − ⎣ ⎦ ⎣ ⎦

T256 48 72

2⎡ ⎤⎢ ⎥[ ]T

QQ MQ M MQF B F B⎡ ⎤ ⎡ ⎤ ⎡ ⎤=⎣ ⎦ ⎣ ⎦ ⎣ ⎦2 48 72 30

672 30 30

EI⎢ ⎥= ⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥⎣ ⎦⎣ ⎦

96 48 72−⎡ ⎤[ ][ ]T

QJ MQ M MJF B F B⎡ ⎤ ⎡ ⎤=⎣ ⎦ ⎣ ⎦

96 48 722 16 0 24

624 12 24

EI

⎡ ⎤⎢ ⎥= ⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥⎣ ⎦24 12 24−⎢ ⎥⎣ ⎦

Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN

79

Page 80: Module1 flexibility-2-problems- rajesh sir

{ } 1⎡ ⎤ ⎡ ⎤{ } { }1

Q QQ QJ JA F F A−

⎡ ⎤ ⎡ ⎤∴ = −⎣ ⎦ ⎣ ⎦

1260 720 3774 38401 720 2496 4224 1760

− −⎡ ⎤⎧ ⎫− ⎪ ⎪⎢ ⎥⎨ ⎬

1053 333

⎧ ⎫⎪ ⎪⎨ ⎬720 2496 4224 1760

875523774 4224 16128 720

⎢ ⎥= − ⎨ ⎬⎢ ⎥⎪ ⎪− − −⎢ ⎥⎣ ⎦⎩ ⎭

53.33353.333−⎨ ⎬⎪ ⎪⎩ ⎭

=

60 10 70−⎧ ⎫ ⎧ ⎫⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪

⎧ ⎫⎪ ⎪{ } { } { } 0 53.333

0 553.333

53.3333.333Q QC QFINAL

A A A ⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪= − + = − + − =⎨ ⎬ ⎨ ⎬⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪⎩ ⎭

⎪ ⎪−⎨ ⎬⎪⎩ ⎩⎭ ⎪⎭0 5 53.3333.333⎩ ⎭ ⎩ ⎩⎭ ⎭

Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN

80

Page 81: Module1 flexibility-2-problems- rajesh sir

Reactions other than redundants

{ } { } [ ]{ } { }A A B A B A⎡ ⎤= − + + ⎣ ⎦

Reactions other than redundants

{ } { } [ ]{ } { }R RC RJ J RQ QA A B A B A⎡ ⎤= − + + ⎣ ⎦

60 0 0 0 50 1 0 0 10⎧ ⎫ ⎡ ⎤ ⎧ ⎫ ⎡ ⎤ ⎧ ⎫{ }

60 0 0 0 50 1 0 0 100 1 0 0 40 0 1 0 53.3330 4 1 1 40 4 2 1 53 333

RA− −⎧ ⎫ ⎡ ⎤ ⎧ ⎫ ⎡ ⎤ ⎧ ⎫

⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥= − + − − + − −⎨ ⎬ ⎨ ⎬ ⎨ ⎬⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥⎩ ⎭ ⎣ ⎦ ⎩ ⎭ ⎣ ⎦ ⎩ ⎭0 4 1 1 40 4 2 1 53.333⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪− − − −⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥⎩ ⎭ ⎣ ⎦ ⎩ ⎭ ⎣ ⎦ ⎩ ⎭

503.333⎧ ⎫

= ⎪ ⎪⎨ ⎬3.333

0⎨ ⎬⎪ ⎪⎩ ⎭

Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN

81

Page 82: Module1 flexibility-2-problems- rajesh sir

Member end actions

{ } { } [ ]{ } { }M MF MJ J MQ QA A B A B A⎡ ⎤= + + ⎣ ⎦

Member end actions

{ } { } [ ]{ } { }M MF MJ J MQ Q⎣ ⎦

0 4 1 1 4 2 1− − − −⎧ ⎫ ⎡ ⎤ ⎡ ⎤⎪ ⎪ ⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥

2.304⎧ ⎫0 0 1 1 4 2 1

50 1040 0 0 1 4 2 1

40 53 333

⎪ ⎪ ⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥⎪ ⎪ ⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥⎧ ⎫ ⎧ ⎫

− − − −⎪ ⎪ ⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪+ +⎨ ⎬ ⎨ ⎬ ⎨ ⎬⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥

15.63615.636

⎧ ⎫⎪ ⎪−⎪ ⎪⎪ ⎪⎨ ⎬40 53.333

40 0 0 1 0 2 140 53.333

0 0 0 0 0 2 1

= + − + −⎨ ⎬ ⎨ ⎬ ⎨ ⎬⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥−⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥⎩ ⎭ ⎩ ⎭⎪ ⎪ ⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥− −⎪ ⎪ ⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥

54.64854.648

⎨ ⎬−⎪ ⎪⎪ ⎪⎪ ⎪

=

0 0 0 0 0 0 1⎪ ⎪ ⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥⎩ ⎭ ⎣ ⎦ ⎣ ⎦ 52.018

⎪ ⎪⎩ ⎭

Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN

82

Page 83: Module1 flexibility-2-problems- rajesh sir

Joint displacements

{ } [ ]{ } { }J JJ J JQ QD F A F A⎡ ⎤= + ⎣ ⎦

Joint displacements

{ } [ ]{ } { }J JJ J JQ Q⎣ ⎦

[ ] [ ] [ ][ ]T64 24 24

2− −⎡ ⎤

⎢ ⎥[ ] [ ] [ ][ ]TJJ MJ M MJF B F B= 2 24 12 12

624 12 24

EI⎢ ⎥= −⎢ ⎥−⎢ ⎥⎣ ⎦

T⎡ ⎤ ⎡ ⎤96 16 24

2− −⎡ ⎤⎢ ⎥[ ] [ ]T

JQ MJ M MQF B F B⎡ ⎤ ⎡ ⎤=⎣ ⎦ ⎣ ⎦2 48 0 12

672 24 24

EI⎢ ⎥= ⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥⎣ ⎦

Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN

83

Page 84: Module1 flexibility-2-problems- rajesh sir

{ }64 24 24 50 96 16 24 10

2 2− − − −⎡ ⎤⎧ ⎫ ⎡ ⎤⎧ ⎫

⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥{ } 2 224 12 12 40 48 0 12 53.3336 6

24 12 24 40 72 24 24 53.333JD

EI EI⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥∴ = − − + −⎨ ⎬ ⎨ ⎬⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪−⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥⎣ ⎦⎩ ⎭ ⎣ ⎦⎩ ⎭

3200 3093.3 35.561 26.67

2 106.682 11200 1120 80.00

6 3E II E EI

−⎛ ⎞⎧ ⎫ ⎧ ⎫ ⎧ ⎫⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪⎜ ⎟= − + = − =⎨ ⎬ ⎨ ⎬ ⎨ ⎬⎜ ⎟⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪

⎧ ⎫⎪ ⎪−⎨ ⎬⎪ ⎪0

6 3720 720 0

E II E EI⎨ ⎬ ⎨ ⎬ ⎨ ⎬⎜ ⎟⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪⎜ ⎟−⎩ ⎭ ⎩ ⎭ ⎩ ⎭

⎨ ⎬⎪ ⎪⎩⎠ ⎭⎝

Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN

84

Page 85: Module1 flexibility-2-problems- rajesh sir

[ ] [ ] [ ][ ]TS MS M MSF B F B=

Alternatively, if the entire [Fs] matrix is assembled at a time,[ ] [ ] [ ][ ]S MS M MSF B F B

4 1 1 4 2 1 4 2 0 0 0 0 4 1 1 4 2 10 1 1 4 2 1 2 4 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 4 2 1

T− − − − − − − − −⎡ ⎤ ⎡ ⎤⎡ ⎤

⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥−⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥0 0 1 4 2 1 0 0 4 2 0 0 0 0 1 4 2 120 0 1 0 2 1 0 0 2 4 0 0 0 0 1 0 2 160 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 2 1

EI

⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥− − − − − − − − −⎢ ⎥

= ⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥−⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥− − − − −⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 1⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥−⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥⎣ ⎦⎣ ⎦ ⎣ ⎦

4 0 0 0 0 0 1 6 6 6 2 4 4 61 1 0 0 0 0 8 6 6 2 4 4 6

− − − −⎡ ⎤ ⎡ ⎤⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥1 1 0 0 0 0 8 6 6 2 4 4 6

1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 6 1 6 1 2 624 4 4 0 0 0 0 0 6 8 1 2 66

2 2 2 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 4 3E I

− −⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥− − − − − −⎢ ⎥

= ⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥− −⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥2 2 2 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 4 3

1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 2 3

⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥− − − −⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥− − −⎢ ⎥ ⎣ ⎦⎣ ⎦

6 4 2 4 2 4 9 6 1 6 2 4− − − −⎡ ⎤⎢ ⎥

[ ]2 4 1 2 1 2 4 8 0 1 22 4 1 2 2 4 7 2 2 4 2 429 6 4 8 7 2 2 5 6 4 8 7 26

1 6 0 2 4 4 8 7 2 3 0

J J J Q

Q J Q Q

F F

E I F F

⎢ ⎥−⎢ ⎥⎡ ⎤⎡ ⎤−⎢ ⎥ ⎣ ⎦⎢ ⎥= =⎢ ⎥− ⎢ ⎥⎡ ⎤ ⎡ ⎤⎢ ⎥ ⎣ ⎦ ⎣ ⎦⎣ ⎦

⎢ ⎥

Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN

1 6 0 2 4 4 8 7 2 3 02 4 1 2 2 4 7 2 3 0 3 0

⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥−⎣ ⎦

Page 86: Module1 flexibility-2-problems- rajesh sir

•Problem 6 (Support settlement)

Analyse the beam. Support B has a downward settlement of 30mm. EI=5.6×103 kNm2×

Static indeterminacy = 3

Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN

Choose reactions at B,C,D as redundants

Page 87: Module1 flexibility-2-problems- rajesh sir

[ ] 3 6Mi

L LEI EIF

−⎡ ⎤⎢ ⎥

= ⎢ ⎥Member flexibility matrix [ ]

6 3

MiFL L

EI EI

⎢ ⎥−⎢ ⎥

⎢ ⎥⎣ ⎦

2 1 0 0 0 01 2 0 0 0 0

−⎡ ⎤⎢ ⎥

Unassembled flexibility matrix

[ ]

1 2 0 0 0 00 0 4 2 0 030 0 2 4 0 06MF

EI

⎢ ⎥−⎢ ⎥−⎢ ⎥

= ⎢ ⎥[ ]0 0 2 4 0 060 0 0 0 2 10 0 0 0 1 2

M EI ⎢ ⎥−⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥−⎢ ⎥⎣ ⎦

Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN

87

0 0 0 0 1 2−⎣ ⎦

Page 88: Module1 flexibility-2-problems- rajesh sir

2525

Fixed end actions 50 502525 2525

Equivalent joint loads 50 50

1JD 2JD3JD

Joint displacements { }JD

A C D30mm 1QD

Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKNSupport settlements { }QD

B

Page 89: Module1 flexibility-2-problems- rajesh sir

AJ1 AJ2 AJ3 AQ1 AQ2 AQ31 1 1 1 1 1

1 1 1 3 9 121 1 1 0 6 9− − − − − −⎡ ⎤⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥

=1 =1 =1 =1 =1 =1

[ ] [ ]

1 1 1 0 6 90 1 1 0 6 90 1 1 0 0 3MS MJ MQB B B

⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥− − − −

⎡ ⎤⎡ ⎤= = ⎢ ⎥⎣ ⎦⎣ ⎦⎢ ⎥0 1 1 0 0 3

0 0 1 0 0 30 0 1 0 0 0

⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥− −⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥⎣ ⎦0 0 1 0 0 0⎢ ⎥⎣ ⎦

[ ] [ ] [ ]RS RJ RQB B B⎡ ⎤⎡ ⎤= =⎣ ⎦⎣ ⎦[ ] [ ] [ ]RS RJ RQ⎣ ⎦⎣ ⎦

Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN

89

Page 90: Module1 flexibility-2-problems- rajesh sir

Redundants:1

{ }

{ } { } { }1

Q QQ Q QJ JA F D F A−⎡ ⎤⎡ ⎤ ⎡ ⎤= −⎣ ⎦ ⎣ ⎦⎣ ⎦

{ }QD is NOT a null matrix

[ ]TF B F B

⎡ ⎤⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥⎡ ⎤ ⎡ ⎤ ⎡ ⎤

0.00883900.00642900.0016070

[ ]QQ MQ M MQF B F B ⎢ ⎥⎡ ⎤ ⎡ ⎤ ⎡ ⎤= =⎣ ⎦ ⎣ ⎦ ⎣ ⎦ ⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥⎣ ⎦0 10290000 06509000 0088390

0.06509000.04339000.0064290

⎣ ⎦

⎡ ⎤⎢ ⎥

0.10290000.06509000.0088390

0 00080360 00080360 0008036

[ ][ ]T

QJ MQ M MJF B F B⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥⎡ ⎤ ⎡ ⎤= =⎣ ⎦ ⎣ ⎦ ⎢ ⎥

0.00723200.00723200.0040180

0.00080360.00080360.0008036

Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN

90

⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥⎣ ⎦

0.01286000.01205000.0056250

Page 91: Module1 flexibility-2-problems- rajesh sir

{ } { } { }1A F D F A

− ⎡ ⎤⎡ ⎤ ⎡ ⎤{ } { } { }Q QQ Q QJ JA F D F A⎡ ⎤⎡ ⎤ ⎡ ⎤∴ = −⎣ ⎦ ⎣ ⎦⎣ ⎦

10.03 00 25F F

−−⎛ ⎞⎧ ⎫ ⎧ ⎫⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪⎜ ⎟⎡ ⎤ ⎡ ⎤= − −⎨ ⎬ ⎨ ⎬⎣ ⎦ ⎣ ⎦⎜ ⎟

62.329 4−⎧ ⎫⎪ ⎪⎨ ⎬0 25

0 25QQ QJF F⎡ ⎤ ⎡ ⎤= − −⎨ ⎬ ⎨ ⎬⎣ ⎦ ⎣ ⎦⎜ ⎟

⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪⎜ ⎟⎩ ⎭ ⎩ ⎭⎝ ⎠

29.413.4

= ⎨ ⎬⎪ ⎪−⎩ ⎭

0 62.3 62.3−⎧ ⎫ ⎧ ⎫⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪

−⎧ ⎫⎪ ⎪{ } { } { } 50 29.4

50 13 479.436 6

Q QC QFINALA A A

⎧ ⎫ ⎧ ⎫⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪= − + = − − + =⎨ ⎬ ⎨ ⎬⎪

⎧ ⎫⎪ ⎪⎨ ⎬⎪ ⎪⎩⎪ ⎪ ⎪− −⎭ ⎩ ⎭ ⎭⎩

Thus, 50 13.4 36.6⎩⎭ ⎩ ⎭ ⎭⎩

Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN

91

Page 92: Module1 flexibility-2-problems- rajesh sir

Member end actions

{ } { } [ ]{ } { }⎡ ⎤

Member end actions

{ } { } [ ]{ } { }M MF MJ J MQ QA A B A B A⎡ ⎤= + + ⎣ ⎦

83.755 4

00

⎧ ⎫⎪ ⎪⎪ ⎪

⎧ ⎫⎪ ⎪⎪ ⎪

[ ]{ } { }55.455.440 3

000 MJ J MQ QB A B A

⎪ ⎪⎪ ⎪

⎡ ⎤= + + =⎨ ⎬ ⎣ ⎦⎪

⎪ ⎪−⎪ ⎪⎨ ⎬⎪ ⎪⎪

[ ]{ } { } 40.340.3

0

02525

Q Q⎣ ⎦⎪ −⎪ ⎪

⎪ ⎪⎪

⎪⎪ ⎪⎪ ⎪

⎩⎩ ⎭⎭⎪

025⎪⎪ ⎪⎩⎩ ⎭− ⎭

Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN

92

Page 93: Module1 flexibility-2-problems- rajesh sir

Reactions other than redundantsReactions other than redundants

Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN

93

Page 94: Module1 flexibility-2-problems- rajesh sir

Joint displacements

{ } [ ]{ } { }J JJ J JQ QD F A F A⎡ ⎤= + ⎣ ⎦

Joint displacements

{ } [ ]{ } { }J JJ J JQ QD F A F A⎡ ⎤+ ⎣ ⎦[ ] [ ] [ ][ ]T

JJ MJ M MJF B F B=

[ ] [ ]TJQ MJ M MQF B F B⎡ ⎤ ⎡ ⎤=⎣ ⎦ ⎣ ⎦

[ ]62.30

29.425JJ JQF F−⎧ ⎫ ⎧ ⎫

⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪⎡ ⎤= +−⎨ ⎬ ⎨ ⎬⎣ ⎦[ ]13.425

JJ JQ⎨ ⎬ ⎨ ⎬⎣ ⎦⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪−⎩ ⎭ ⎩ ⎭

⎧ ⎫3

3

7.5 100.5 10

⎧ ⎫− ×⎪ ⎪×⎨ ⎬⎪

=⎪

Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN

9433.1 10−⎪ ×⎩⎪⎭

Page 95: Module1 flexibility-2-problems- rajesh sir

Alternatively if the entire [Fs] matrix is assembled at a time

[ ] [ ] [ ][ ]TS MS M MSF B F B=

Alternatively, if the entire [Fs] matrix is assembled at a time,

1 1 1 3 9 12 2 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 3 9 121 1 1 0 6 9 1 2 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 6 9

T− − − − − − − − − − − − −⎡ ⎤ ⎡ ⎤⎡ ⎤⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥1 1 1 0 6 9 1 2 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 6 9

0 1 1 0 6 9 0 0 4 2 0 0 0 1 1 0 6 930 1 1 0 0 3 0 0 2 4 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 36EI

⎢ ⎥−⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥− − − − − − − − −⎢ ⎥

= ⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥−⎢ ⎥ ⎢⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥ ⎢⎢ ⎥

⎥⎥0 0 1 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 1 0 0 3

0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 0 0 1 0 0 0

⎢ ⎥ ⎢⎢ ⎥− − − − −⎢ ⎥ ⎢⎢ ⎥−⎢ ⎥ ⎢⎣ ⎦⎣ ⎦ ⎣ ⎦

⎥⎥⎥

⎡ ⎤⎡ ⎤0.01205000.00723200.00080360.00160700.00160700.0005357

0.00562500.00401800.00080360.00053570.00053570.0005357⎡ ⎤⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥

[ ]JJ JQ

QJ QQ

F F

F F

⎡ ⎤⎡ ⎤⎣ ⎦⎢ ⎥=⎢ ⎥⎡ ⎤ ⎡ ⎤⎣ ⎦ ⎣ ⎦⎣ ⎦0.06509000.04339000.00642900.00723200.00723200.0040180

0.00883900.00642900.00160700.00080360.00080360.0008036

0.01286000.00723200.00080360.00214300.00160700.0005357⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥

Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN

95

0.10290000.06509000.00883900.01286000.01205000.0056250⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥⎣ ⎦

Page 96: Module1 flexibility-2-problems- rajesh sir

•Problem 6a ( Same problem as above, with a different Problem 6a ( Same problem as above, with a different approach)

25 28

A D

25 25

6 03EI

28

BC

2

6 .03 1123

EI ×=

2

6 .03 286

EI ×=

112

12 .03EI ×74.667

3

12 .036

EI ×9.333 50 50

3374.667=

69.333=

Fixed end actions

Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN

96

Page 97: Module1 flexibility-2-problems- rajesh sir

253

A

B

C D112

84

74 6679.333 50+ 50

74.667 74.667 9.333+

Equivalent joint loads

Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN

97

Page 98: Module1 flexibility-2-problems- rajesh sir

L L−⎡ ⎤

[ ] 3 6Mi

L LEI EIFL L

⎡ ⎤⎢ ⎥

= ⎢ ⎥−⎢ ⎥

Member flexibility matrix

6 3L L

EI EI⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥⎣ ⎦

Unassembled flexibility matrix2 1 0 0 0 01 2 0 0 0 0

−⎡ ⎤⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥

Unassembled flexibility matrix

[ ]

1 2 0 0 0 00 0 4 2 0 030 0 2 4 0 06MF

EI

⎢ ⎥−⎢ ⎥−⎢ ⎥

= ⎢ ⎥[ ]0 0 2 4 0 060 0 0 0 2 1

M EI ⎢ ⎥−⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥−⎢ ⎥

Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN

98

0 0 0 0 1 2⎢ ⎥−⎣ ⎦

Page 99: Module1 flexibility-2-problems- rajesh sir

AJ1 AJ2 AJ3 AQ1 AQ2 AQ3=1 =1 =1 =1 =1 =1

1 1 1 3 9 121 1 1 0 6 9− − − − − −⎡ ⎤⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥

[ ] [ ] 0 1 1 0 6 90 1 1 0 0 3MS MJ MQB B B

⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥− − − −

⎡ ⎤⎡ ⎤= = ⎢ ⎥⎣ ⎦⎣ ⎦⎢ ⎥0 1 1 0 0 3

0 0 1 0 0 30 0 1 0 0 0

⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥− −⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥⎣ ⎦

(Same as in the previous approach) 0 0 1 0 0 0⎢ ⎥⎣ ⎦

Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN

99

Page 100: Module1 flexibility-2-problems- rajesh sir

Redundants:

{ } { } { }1A F D F A

−⎡ ⎤⎡ ⎤ ⎡ ⎤⎣ ⎦ ⎣ ⎦⎣ ⎦{ } { } { }Q QQ Q QJ JA F D F A⎡ ⎤⎡ ⎤ ⎡ ⎤= −⎣ ⎦ ⎣ ⎦⎣ ⎦

[ ]TF B F B

⎡ ⎤⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥⎡ ⎤ ⎡ ⎤ ⎡ ⎤

0.00883900.00642900.0016070

[ ]QQ MQ M MQF B F B ⎢ ⎥⎡ ⎤ ⎡ ⎤ ⎡ ⎤= =⎣ ⎦ ⎣ ⎦ ⎣ ⎦ ⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥⎣ ⎦0.10290000.06509000.0088390

0.06509000.04339000.0064290

⎣ ⎦

⎡ ⎤⎢ ⎥0 00080360 00080360 0008036

[ ][ ]T

QJ MQ M MJF B F B⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥⎡ ⎤ ⎡ ⎤= =⎣ ⎦ ⎣ ⎦ ⎢ ⎥

0.00723200.00723200.0040180

0.00080360.00080360.0008036

Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN

100

⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥⎣ ⎦

0.01286000.01205000.0056250

Page 101: Module1 flexibility-2-problems- rajesh sir

0 84−⎛ ⎞⎧ ⎫ ⎧ ⎫⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪⎜ ⎟

21.7⎧ ⎫⎪ ⎪

{ } 10 30 25

Q QQ QJA F F− ⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪⎜ ⎟⎡ ⎤ ⎡ ⎤= −⎨ ⎬ ⎨ ⎬⎣ ⎦ ⎣ ⎦⎜ ⎟

⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪⎜ ⎟⎩ ⎭⎩ ⎭⎝ ⎠

2013.4

⎪ ⎪⎨ ⎬⎪−⎩

=⎪⎭⎩ ⎭⎩ ⎭⎝ ⎠

Note the differences hereNote the differences here.

{ } { } { }84 21.7 62.3⎧ ⎫ ⎧ ⎫

⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪−⎧ ⎫⎪ ⎪{ } { } { } 59.4 20

5079.436.613.4

Q QC QFINALA A A ⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪=− + =− − + =⎨ ⎬ ⎨ ⎬

⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪− −

⎪ ⎪⎨ ⎬⎪⎩⎩ ⎭ ⎩ ⎭ ⎪⎭

Thus,

Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN

101Note the difference here.

Page 102: Module1 flexibility-2-problems- rajesh sir

M b d ti

{ } { } [ ]{ } { }M MF MJ J MQ QA A B A B A⎡ ⎤= + + ⎣ ⎦

Member end actions

{ } { } [ ]{ } { }Q Q⎣ ⎦

112⎧ ⎫⎪ ⎪

83.7⎧ ⎫⎪ ⎪

{ } [ ]{ } { }112

28

⎧ ⎫⎪ ⎪⎪ ⎪−⎪ ⎪

⎡ ⎤⎨ ⎬

55.455.4

⎧ ⎫⎪ ⎪⎪ ⎪−⎪ ⎪⎨ ⎬{ } [ ]{ } { }28

25

M MJ J MQ QA B A B A⎪ ⎪

⎡ ⎤= + +⎨ ⎬ ⎣ ⎦−⎪ ⎪⎪ ⎪

40.340 3

⎪ ⎪⎨ ⎬−⎪⎪

=⎪⎪25

25⎪ ⎪⎪ ⎪−⎩ ⎭

40.30

⎪⎪⎩

⎪⎪⎭

Note the difference here.

Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN

102

Page 103: Module1 flexibility-2-problems- rajesh sir

Reactions other than redundantsReactions other than redundants

Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN

103

Page 104: Module1 flexibility-2-problems- rajesh sir

{ }⎡ ⎤

Joint displacements

{ } [ ]{ } { }J JJ J JQ QD F A F A⎡ ⎤= + ⎣ ⎦

[ ]21.784203JJ JQF F

−⎧ ⎫ ⎧ ⎫⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪⎡ ⎤= +⎨ ⎬ ⎨ ⎬⎣ ⎦[ ] 203

13.425JJ JQF F⎡ ⎤+⎨ ⎬ ⎨ ⎬⎣ ⎦

⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪−⎩ ⎭ ⎩ ⎭

3

3

7.5 100 5 10

⎧ ⎫− ×⎪ ⎪×⎨ ⎬=

3

0.5 103.1 10−

×⎨ ⎬⎪ ×⎩

=⎪⎭

Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN

104

Page 105: Module1 flexibility-2-problems- rajesh sir

•Problem 7:

Static indeterminacy = 2 ( 1 internal + 1 external )

Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN105

Choose reaction at B and force in AD as redundants

Page 106: Module1 flexibility-2-problems- rajesh sir

Released structureReleased structure

Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN

Page 107: Module1 flexibility-2-problems- rajesh sir

Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN

Redundants [AQ] and reactions other than redundants [AR]

Page 108: Module1 flexibility-2-problems- rajesh sir

Member flexibility matrix of truss member

⎡ ⎤[ ]MiLF

EA⎡ ⎤= ⎢ ⎥⎣ ⎦

Unassembled flexibility matrix

1 0 0 0 0 00 1.414 0 0 0 0⎡ ⎤⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥

[ ] 0 0 1.414 0 0 00 0 0 1 0 0M

LFEA

⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥

= ⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥0 0 0 0 1 00 0 0 0 0 1

⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥⎣ ⎦

Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN

108

⎣ ⎦

Page 109: Module1 flexibility-2-problems- rajesh sir

To find [BMS] and [BRS] matrices:

are found from the released structure when it [ ]MSB [ ]RSBand

is subjected to 1 2 3 4 1 21, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1J J J J Q QA A A A A A= = = = = =separately.

3JDD 3JD2JD

1JD 5

2 3

D

1 4

4JD6

Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN

109Joint displacements

Page 110: Module1 flexibility-2-problems- rajesh sir

1 1JA = 2 1JA =

1

1 111A = 13 1JA =

4 1JA =1

Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN

1101

Page 111: Module1 flexibility-2-problems- rajesh sir

1A =1 1QA =2 1QA =

1

1 11 1

Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN

111

Page 112: Module1 flexibility-2-problems- rajesh sir

•Each column in the submatrix consists of member [ ]MJBforces caused by a unit value of a joint load applied to the released structure.

[ ]

•Each column in the submatrix consists of member forces caused by a unit value of a redundant applied to the

MQB⎡ ⎤⎣ ⎦

released structure.AJ1 AJ2 AJ3 AJ4 AQ1 AQ2=1 =1 =1 =1 =1 =1

0 1 0 0 0 0.7070 0 0 0 0 1

−⎡ ⎤⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥

=1 =1 =1 =1 =1 =1

0 0 0 0 0 11.414 0 0 0 1.414 1

⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥

= ⎢ ⎥[ ] [ ]MS MJ MQB B B⎡ ⎤⎡ ⎤= ⎣ ⎦⎣ ⎦ 1 0 1 0 1 0.7071 0 0 0 0 0.707

= ⎢ ⎥− − −⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥− −⎢ ⎥

[ ] [ ]MS MJ MQ⎣ ⎦⎣ ⎦

Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN

0 0 0 1 0 0.707⎢ ⎥

−⎢ ⎥⎣ ⎦

Page 113: Module1 flexibility-2-problems- rajesh sir

•Each column in the submatrix consists of support [ ]RJB•Each column in the submatrix consists of support reactions caused by a unit value of a joint load applied to the released structure.

[ ]RJ

RQB⎡ ⎤⎣ ⎦•Each column in the submatrix consists of Q⎣ ⎦support reactions caused by a unit value of a redundant applied to the released structure.

AJ1 AJ2 AJ3 AJ4 AQ1 AQ2

1 0 0 1 1 0− − −⎡ ⎤

AJ1 AJ2 AJ3 AJ4 AQ1 AQ2=1 =1 =1 =1 =1 =1

[ ] [ ]1 0 0 1 1 01 1 0 0 1 0

1 0 1 0 1 0RS RJ RQB B B

⎡ ⎤⎢ ⎥⎡ ⎤⎡ ⎤= = − − −⎣ ⎦⎣ ⎦ ⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥

Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN

113

1 0 1 0 1 0⎢ ⎥−⎣ ⎦

Page 114: Module1 flexibility-2-problems- rajesh sir

Redundants

{ }QD∵ is a null matrix{ } { }1

Q QQ QJ JA F F A−

⎡ ⎤ ⎡ ⎤= − ⎣ ⎦ ⎣ ⎦ { }Q{ } { }Q QQ QJ J⎡ ⎤ ⎡ ⎤⎣ ⎦ ⎣ ⎦

3 828 2 707⎡ ⎤[ ]T

QQ MQ M MQF B F B⎡ ⎤ ⎡ ⎤ ⎡ ⎤=⎣ ⎦ ⎣ ⎦ ⎣ ⎦3.828 2.7072.707 4.828

LEA

⎡ ⎤= ⎢ ⎥

⎣ ⎦

[ ][ ]T

QJ MQ M MJF B F B⎡ ⎤ ⎡ ⎤=⎣ ⎦ ⎣ ⎦⎣ ⎦ ⎣ ⎦

3.828 0 1 0L −⎡ ⎤⎢ ⎥3.414 0.707 0.707 0.707EA

= ⎢ ⎥− − −⎣ ⎦

Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN

Page 115: Module1 flexibility-2-problems- rajesh sir

1−⎧ ⎫⎪ ⎪

{ }13.828 2.707 3.828 0 1 0 2

2.707 4.828 3.414 0.707 0.707 0.707 0QEA PLAL EA

− ⎪ ⎪− −⎡ ⎤ ⎡ ⎤− ⎪ ⎪∴ = ⎨ ⎬⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥− − −⎣ ⎦ ⎣ ⎦ ⎪ ⎪0

⎪ ⎪⎪ ⎪⎩ ⎭

⎧ ⎫1.1720.243

P ⎧=

⎫⎨ ⎬−⎩ ⎭

(There are no loads applied directly to the supports.)

Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN

Page 116: Module1 flexibility-2-problems- rajesh sir

Member forces

{ } { } [ ]{ } { }M MF MJ J MQ QA A B A B A⎡ ⎤= + + ⎣ ⎦{ } { } [ ]{ } { }M MF MJ J MQ Q⎣ ⎦

0 1 0 0 0 0 707⎡ ⎤ ⎡ ⎤ 1.828−⎧ ⎫0 1 0 0 0 0.7070 0 0 0 1 0 1

1 414 0 0 0 2 1 414 1 1 172

−⎡ ⎤ ⎡ ⎤⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥−⎧ ⎫⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥⎪ ⎪⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥ ⎧ ⎫⎪ ⎪

1.8280.243

0

⎧ ⎫⎪ ⎪−⎪ ⎪⎪ ⎪1.414 0 0 0 2 1.414 1 1.172

1 0 1 0 0 1 0.707 0.2431 0 0 0 0 0 0 707

P P⎪ ⎪−⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥ ⎧ ⎫⎪ ⎪= +⎨ ⎬ ⎨ ⎬⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥− − − −⎩ ⎭⎪ ⎪⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥⎪ ⎪⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥⎩ ⎭

00

1 172

P⎪ ⎪⎨ ⎬⎪ ⎪⎪ ⎪

=

1 0 0 0 0 0 0.7070 0 0 1 0 0.707

⎪ ⎪⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥− −⎩ ⎭⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥−⎣ ⎦ ⎣ ⎦

1.1720.172

⎪ ⎪⎪ ⎪⎩ ⎭

Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN

116

Page 117: Module1 flexibility-2-problems- rajesh sir

Reactions other than redundants

{ }⎡ ⎤{ } { } [ ]{ } { }R RC RJ J RQ QA A B A B A⎡ ⎤= − + + ⎣ ⎦

1⎧ ⎫11 0 0 1 1 0

2 1.1721 1 0 0 1 0

0 0 243P P

−⎧ ⎫− − −⎡ ⎤ ⎡ ⎤⎪ ⎪− ⎧ ⎫⎪ ⎪⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥= − − + −⎨ ⎬ ⎨ ⎬⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥ ⎩ ⎭0 0.2431 0 1 0 1 0

0

⎨ ⎬ ⎨ ⎬⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥ −⎩ ⎭⎪ ⎪−⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥⎣ ⎦ ⎣ ⎦⎪ ⎪⎩ ⎭

0.1721 828 P−⎧ ⎫

⎪ ⎪⎨ ⎬= 1.828

0.172P⎨ ⎬

⎪ ⎪⎩ ⎭

=

Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN

117

Page 118: Module1 flexibility-2-problems- rajesh sir

{ } [ ]{ } { }J JJ J JQ QD F A F A⎡ ⎤= + ⎣ ⎦Joint displacements { }⎣ ⎦J p

4.828 0 1 00 1 0 0

−⎡ ⎤⎢ ⎥

[ ] [ ] [ ][ ]TJJ MJ M MJF B F B=

0 1 0 01 0 1 0

LEA

⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥=−⎢ ⎥

⎢ ⎥0 0 0 1⎢ ⎥⎣ ⎦

3.828 3.414⎡ ⎤

[ ] [ ]TJQ MJ M MQF B F B⎡ ⎤ ⎡ ⎤=⎣ ⎦ ⎣ ⎦

3.828 3.4140 0.7071 0 707

LEA

⎡ ⎤⎢ ⎥−⎢ ⎥=− −⎢ ⎥1 0.7070 0.707

EA − −⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥−⎣ ⎦1.172−⎧ ⎫

⎪ ⎪{ }

1.8280J

PA

D LE

⎪∴ =

⎪−⎪ ⎪⎨ ⎬⎪ ⎪

Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN

0.172⎪ ⎪⎪ ⎪⎩ ⎭

Page 119: Module1 flexibility-2-problems- rajesh sir

Alternatively, if the entire [Fs] matrix is assembled at a time,

[ ] [ ] [ ][ ]TS MS M MSF B F B=

T0 1 0 0 0 0 707⎡ ⎤0 1 0 0 0 0.7070 0 0 0 0 1

1 414 0 0 01 414 1

−⎡ ⎤⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥1.414 0 0 01.414 1

1 0 1 0 1 0.7071 0 0 0 0 0 707

⎢ ⎥= ⎢ ⎥− − −⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥1 0 0 0 0 0.707

0 0 0 1 0 0.707

⎢ ⎥− −⎢ ⎥

−⎢ ⎥⎣ ⎦

⎡ ⎤⎡ ⎤1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0.7070 1.414 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 0 1 414 0 0 0 1 414 0 0 01 414 1

−⎡ ⎤⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥

⎡ ⎤⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥0 0 1.414 0 0 0 1.414 0 0 01.414 1

0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 00 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0

LEA

⎢ ⎥× ⎢ ⎥ −⎢ ⎥

⎢ ⎥1 0.707

0 0 707

⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥− −⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥

Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN

0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1⎢ ⎥ −⎢ ⎥⎣ ⎦

0 0.7070 0.707

⎢ ⎥−⎢ ⎥

−⎢ ⎥⎣ ⎦

Page 120: Module1 flexibility-2-problems- rajesh sir

4 828 0 1 0 3 828 3 414−⎡ ⎤4.828 0 1 0 3.828 3.4140 1 0 0 0 0.7071 0 1 0 1 0 707

−⎡ ⎤⎢ ⎥−⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥[ ] 1 0 1 0 1 0.707

0 0 0 1 0 0.707SLF

EA− − −⎢ ⎥

= ⎢ ⎥−⎢ ⎥3.828 0 1 0 3.828 2.7073.414 0.707 0.707 0.707 2.707 4.828

⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥−⎢ ⎥− − −⎣ ⎦⎣ ⎦

[ ]JJ JQF F⎡ ⎤⎡ ⎤⎣ ⎦⎢ ⎥=QJ QQF F

⎢ ⎥=⎢ ⎥⎡ ⎤ ⎡ ⎤⎣ ⎦ ⎣ ⎦⎣ ⎦

Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN

120

Page 121: Module1 flexibility-2-problems- rajesh sir

•Problem 8:

Static indeterminacy = 1

Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN

121Choose the force in CD as redundant

Page 122: Module1 flexibility-2-problems- rajesh sir

1JA =

1JD

2JA =2JD

2JADJ1 and DJ2

: Joint displacements

M b fl ibilit

Released structure with loads

Member flexibility matrix of truss member: [ ]Mi

LFEA

=

5 0 0⎡ ⎤[ ]

5 0 01 0 2 0MF

EA

⎡ ⎤⎢ ⎥= ⎢ ⎥Unassembled flexibility matrix:

Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN

1220 0 5

EA ⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥⎣ ⎦

Page 123: Module1 flexibility-2-problems- rajesh sir

are found from the released structure when [ ]MSB [ ]RSBand are found from the released structure when it is subjected to separately. 1 2 11, 1, 1J J QA A A= = =[ ]MSB [ ]RSBand

1 1JA =

2 1JA =

Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN

123

Page 124: Module1 flexibility-2-problems- rajesh sir

1 1QA =1 1QA

Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN

124

Page 125: Module1 flexibility-2-problems- rajesh sir

•Each column in the submatrix consists of member [ ]MJBforces caused by a unit value of a joint load applied to the released structure.

[ ]MJ

•Each column in the submatrix consists of member forces caused by a unit value of a redundant applied to

MQB⎡ ⎤⎣ ⎦forces caused by a unit value of a redundant applied to the released structure.

[ ] [ ]0.833 0.625 0.625

0 0 1MS MJ MQB B B−⎡ ⎤

⎢ ⎥⎡ ⎤⎡ ⎤= =⎣ ⎦⎣ ⎦ ⎢ ⎥[ ] [ ]0.833 0.625 0.625

MS MJ MQ⎣ ⎦⎣ ⎦ ⎢ ⎥− −⎢ ⎥⎣ ⎦

•In this problem, since support reactions can be easily found out once the forces in members are obtained,

Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN

matrix need not be assembled. [ ]RSB

Page 126: Module1 flexibility-2-problems- rajesh sir

Redundants:

{ }QD∵ is a null matrix{ } { }1

Q QQ QJ JA F F A−

⎡ ⎤ ⎡ ⎤= − ⎣ ⎦ ⎣ ⎦

[ ]TF B F B⎡ ⎤ ⎡ ⎤ ⎡ ⎤=⎣ ⎦ ⎣ ⎦ ⎣ ⎦[ ]QQ MQ M MQF B F B⎡ ⎤ ⎡ ⎤ ⎡ ⎤=⎣ ⎦ ⎣ ⎦ ⎣ ⎦

5 0 0 0.625⎡ ⎤ ⎡ ⎤[ ] 1 0 2 00.625 1 0.625 1

0 0 5 0 625EA

⎡ ⎤ ⎡ ⎤⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥= ⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥⎣ ⎦⎣ ⎦

5.906EA

=

0 0 5 0.625⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥⎣ ⎦⎣ ⎦

0⎧ ⎫[ ][ ]T

QJ MQ M MJF B F B⎡ ⎤ ⎡ ⎤=⎣ ⎦ ⎣ ⎦01

3.906EA⎧ ⎫

= ⎨ ⎬−⎩ ⎭

Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN

Page 127: Module1 flexibility-2-problems- rajesh sir

1{ } { }1

Q QQ QJ JA F F A−

⎡ ⎤ ⎡ ⎤∴ = −⎣ ⎦ ⎣ ⎦

[ ]151 0 3.906105.906

EAEA

⎧ ⎫−= − ⎨ ⎬

⎩ ⎭⎩ ⎭

6.614 kN=

Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN

Page 128: Module1 flexibility-2-problems- rajesh sir

Member forces:

{ } { } [ ]{ } { }M MF MJ J MQ QA A B A B A⎡ ⎤= + + ⎣ ⎦

Member forces:

{ } { } [ ]{ } { }M MF MJ J MQ QA A B A B A⎡ ⎤+ + ⎣ ⎦

0.833 0.625 0.62515

0 0 1 6.61410

−⎡ ⎤ ⎡ ⎤⎧ ⎫⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥= +⎨ ⎬⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥⎩ ⎭10

0.833 0.625 0.625⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥⎩ ⎭− −⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥⎣ ⎦ ⎣ ⎦

6.245 4.134 10.379⎧ ⎫ ⎡ ⎤⎪ ⎪ ⎢ ⎥

⎧ ⎫⎪ ⎪0 6.614

18.745 4.1346.61414.611

⎪ ⎪ ⎢ ⎥= + =⎨ ⎬ ⎢ ⎥⎪

⎪ ⎪⎨ ⎬⎪ ⎪−⎩⎪− ⎢ ⎥⎩ ⎣ ⎦ ⎭⎭

Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN

128

⎩⎩ ⎣ ⎦ ⎭⎭

Page 129: Module1 flexibility-2-problems- rajesh sir

{ } [ ]{ } { }D F A F A⎡ ⎤= + ⎣ ⎦Joint displacements: { } [ ]{ } { }J JJ J JQ QD F A F A⎡ ⎤= + ⎣ ⎦Joint displacements:

6 939 01 ⎡ ⎤[ ] [ ] [ ][ ]TJJ MJ M MJF B F B=

6.939 010 3.906EA

⎡ ⎤= ⎢ ⎥

⎣ ⎦

[ ] [ ]TF B F B⎡ ⎤ ⎡ ⎤=⎣ ⎦ ⎣ ⎦01 ⎧ ⎫

⎨ ⎬[ ] [ ]JQ MJ M MQF B F B⎡ ⎤ ⎡ ⎤=⎣ ⎦ ⎣ ⎦ 3.906EA= ⎨ ⎬−⎩ ⎭

{ }6.939 0 15 01 1 6.614

0 3.906 10 3.906JDEA EA

⎧ ⎫ ⎧ ⎫⎡ ⎤∴ = +⎨ ⎬ ⎨ ⎬⎢ ⎥ −⎩ ⎭ ⎩ ⎭⎣ ⎦

104.0851 ⎧ ⎫⎨ ⎬

⎩ ⎭ ⎩ ⎭⎣ ⎦

Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN

13.226EA ⎨⎩

= ⎬⎭

Page 130: Module1 flexibility-2-problems- rajesh sir

Alternatively, if the entire [Fs] matrix is assembled at a time,

[ ] [ ] [ ][ ]TS MS M MSF B F B=

T0 833 0 625 0 625 5 0 0 0 833 0 625 0 625⎡ ⎤ ⎡ ⎤⎡ ⎤0.833 0.625 0.625 5 0 0 0.833 0.625 0.62510 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 1

0 833 0 625 0 625 0 0 5 0 833 0 625 0 625EA

− −⎡ ⎤ ⎡ ⎤⎡ ⎤⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥= ⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥⎣ ⎦ ⎣ ⎦⎣ ⎦0.833 0.625 0.625 0 0 5 0.833 0.625 0.625− − − −⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥⎣ ⎦ ⎣ ⎦⎣ ⎦

T0.833 0.625 0.625 4.165 3.125 3.125− −⎡ ⎤ ⎡ ⎤0.833 0.625 0.625 4.165 3.125 3.12510 0 1 0 0 2

0 833 0 625 0 625 4 165 3 125 3 125EA

⎡ ⎤ ⎡ ⎤⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥= ⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥− − − −⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥⎣ ⎦ ⎣ ⎦

[ ]F F⎡ ⎤⎡ ⎤⎣ ⎦6.939 0 0

1⎡ ⎤⎢ ⎥

0.833 0.625 0.625 4.165 3.125 3.125⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥⎣ ⎦ ⎣ ⎦

[ ]JJ JQ

QJ QQ

F F

F F

⎡ ⎤⎡ ⎤⎣ ⎦⎢ ⎥=⎢ ⎥⎡ ⎤ ⎡ ⎤⎣ ⎦ ⎣ ⎦⎣ ⎦

1 0 3.906 3.9060 3.906 5.906

EA⎢ ⎥= −⎢ ⎥

−⎢ ⎥⎣ ⎦

Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN

QJ QQ⎣ ⎦ ⎣ ⎦⎣ ⎦⎣ ⎦

Page 131: Module1 flexibility-2-problems- rajesh sir

Lack of fit and temperature change problems:

{ } { }1 T−⎡ ⎤ ⎡ ⎤

ac o t a d te pe atu e c a ge p ob e s:

{ } { }1 T

QT QQ MQ TA F B D⎡ ⎤ ⎡ ⎤= − ⎣ ⎦ ⎣ ⎦Redundants:

{ }TD are the displacements (change in length in the case of trusses) due to lack of fit or temperature changes.) p g

MQB⎡ ⎤⎣ ⎦ are the member forces when unit load is applied MQB⎡ ⎤⎣ ⎦ are the member forces when unit load is applied corresponding to the redundants separately.

{ } { }MT MQ QTA B A⎡ ⎤= ⎣ ⎦Member forces:

Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN

Page 132: Module1 flexibility-2-problems- rajesh sir

•Problem 9: Member AB is too short by 1 mm. (i.e., AB is 1 mm shorter than C( ,required, hence it has to be pulled to fit in the frame). All

b h i l members have cross sectional areas 35 cm2 and E=2.1x103 t/cm2

D

A B

D

300

300

300

300

A B

10m

300 300

Internal indeterminacy = 1

Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN132

Choose the force in AB as redundant

Page 133: Module1 flexibility-2-problems- rajesh sir

Member flexibility matrix of truss member

L⎡ ⎤[ ]MiLF

EA⎡ ⎤= ⎢ ⎥⎣ ⎦

Unassembled flexibility matrix

1000 0 0 0 0 00 1000 0 0 0 0

⎡ ⎤⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥

[ ] 0 0 577.36 0 0 010 0 0 577.36 0 0MF

EA

⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥

= ⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥

0 0 0 0 577.36 00 0 0 0 0 1000

⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥⎣ ⎦

Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN

⎣ ⎦

Page 134: Module1 flexibility-2-problems- rajesh sir

⎡ ⎤ are the member forces when a unit load is MQB⎡ ⎤⎣ ⎦

are the member forces when a unit load is applied corresponding to the redundant.

CC

1 24

3 5D

A B

1 1QA =6

Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN

1Q

Page 135: Module1 flexibility-2-problems- rajesh sir

A

1⎧ ⎫

AQ1=1

0⎧ ⎫⎪ ⎪1

11 732

⎧ ⎫⎪ ⎪⎪ ⎪⎪ ⎪ { }

00

⎪ ⎪⎪ ⎪⎪ ⎪1.732

1.732MQB−⎪ ⎪

⎡ ⎤ = ⎨ ⎬⎣ ⎦ −⎪ ⎪⎪ ⎪

{ }000

TD⎪ ⎪

= ⎨ ⎬⎪ ⎪⎪ ⎪1.732

1

⎪ ⎪−⎪ ⎪⎩ ⎭

00.1

⎪ ⎪⎪ ⎪−⎩ ⎭⎩ ⎭

Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN

Page 136: Module1 flexibility-2-problems- rajesh sir

Redundants (due to lack of fit):

{ } { }1 T

QT QQ MQ TA F B D−

⎡ ⎤ ⎡ ⎤= − ⎣ ⎦ ⎣ ⎦

T⎡ ⎤ ⎡ ⎤ ⎡ ⎤ 8196

{ } { }Q QQ Q⎣ ⎦ ⎣ ⎦

[ ]T

QQ MQ M MQF B F B⎡ ⎤ ⎡ ⎤ ⎡ ⎤=⎣ ⎦ ⎣ ⎦ ⎣ ⎦8196AE

=

0⎧ ⎫00

⎧ ⎫⎪ ⎪⎪ ⎪⎪ ⎪{ } [ ]

01 1 1.732 1.732 1.732 1

08196QTAEA

⎪ ⎪−∴ = − − − ⎨ ⎬

⎪ ⎪00 1

⎪ ⎪⎪ ⎪⎪ ⎪−⎩ ⎭

Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN

0.1−⎩ ⎭0.89677 tons=

Page 137: Module1 flexibility-2-problems- rajesh sir

Member forces (due to lack of fit):

{ } { }⎡ ⎤

Member forces (due to lack of fit):

{ } { }MT MQ QTA B A⎡ ⎤= ⎣ ⎦

11

⎧ ⎫⎪ ⎪⎪ ⎪

0.896770 89677⎧ ⎫⎪ ⎪⎪ ⎪

{ } { }

11.732

0.89677MTA

⎪ ⎪−⎪ ⎪

= ⎨ ⎬

0.896771.553

tons

⎪ ⎪−⎪ ⎪

= ⎨ ⎬{ } { }1.7321.732

MT ⎨ ⎬−⎪ ⎪⎪ ⎪−⎪ ⎪

1.5531.553

⎨ ⎬−⎪ ⎪⎪ ⎪−⎪ ⎪

1⎪ ⎪⎩ ⎭ 0.89677

⎪ ⎪⎩ ⎭

Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN

Page 138: Module1 flexibility-2-problems- rajesh sir

SummarySummary

Fl ibilit th dFlexibility method

• Analysis of simple structures – plane truss, continuous beam and plane frame- nodal loads and element loads –lack of fit and temperature effectslack of fit and temperature effects.

Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN

138