View
105
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Dr. S.Meenatchi Sundaram, Department of Instrumentation & Control Engineering, MIT, Manipal
ICE 4010: MICRO ELECTRO MECHANICAL SYSTEMS (MEMS)
Lecture #09
Scaling Laws
Dr. S. Meenatchi SundaramEmail: [email protected]
1
Effect of size reduction
2Dr. S.Meenatchi Sundaram, Department of Instrumentation & Control Engineering, MIT, Manipal
As you decrease the size
• Friction > inertia
• Heat dissipation > Heat storage
• Electrostatic force > Magnetic Force
2
Surface Area to Volume Ratio
10, 101010 1000
0.1 V0.1x0.1x0.10.001
0.1 10 0.01
Scale for change in length Scale for change in Volume
0. 001 1000 0.000001
From the above example it can be seen that 0.01
Conclusion: If a body changes size by a scale S, the volume changes by a scale .
The same can be shown for surface area, The surface area will change by scale
Characteristics of MEMS
Design Issues of Micro Sensors
3
What are the implications of this?Heat Storage ∝ Volume
Heat Dissipation ∝ Surface Area
Buoyant Forces
From the example above: 1000 !
= 0.001 !
!1000000 !" #.
• If both cubes were heated to the same temperature, the smaller cubewould contain 1000000 times less heat than the larger cube. On theother hand, surface area is only 10,000 times less than the larger cube.
• This will mean 100 times more heat dissipation on the smaller cube.Volume relates, for example, to both mechanical and thermal inertia.Thermal inertia is a measure on how fast we can heat or cool a solid. Itis an important parameter in the design of a thermally actuated devices.
Design Issues of Micro Sensors
4
Scaling effects on spring constant (k)
• Consider a beam, length L, width w, Thickness t, and Young's Modulus E.
Design Issues of Micro Sensors
5
• Step 1: Derive eqn for parameter of interest.
$ %&
4
• Step 2: Identify all scale related parameters.Let l be L, w be aL and t be bL
$ %()(
4(
• $ +,-.
/-0= (
+,
/Hence: $ ∝ (
• This implies : As L decreases, k decreases.
• Therefore, the smaller the beam, the smaller the spring constant k, or the more flexible it is.
Design Issues of Micro Sensors
6
Stress in a rod connected to a mass experiencing a constant acceleration
Step 2: Identify all parameters related to length
Step 3: Redefine length related parameters
1 
3
( )( 4( 2
3(
Step 4: Re- write expression:
1 )42
3(
(
1 ∝ (
Step 1: Derive governing question for
tensile stress
1
5
1
3
Design Issues of Micro Sensors
7
Size related to massConsider a cantilever beam with L=500 um, W=50 um and t=5um. Let 10mg mass is attached at the free end with a size of l=w=50um.
m=rho x vol
10 mg = 2330 kg/m3 x vol
10 x 10^-6 kg = 2330 kg/m3 x vol
0.00429 x 10^12 um3 = 50 x 50 x t
um3
429x10^7/2500 um = t
1.71x10^6 um = t
Mass of the cantilever = 500 x 50 x 5 um^3 x rho
= 0.29 x 10^-3 mg
Design Issues of Micro Sensors
8
Resistance
• Given a conductor with a length L, cross-
section A, and resistivity ρ, the resistance is
R = ρ L / A
6 ρ(
)(
6 ∝ 7
As the resistor is scaled down by scale factor
S, its resistance increases as S-1.
Design Issues of Micro Sensors
9
Consider a small piece of piezoresistor embedded
on a silicon diaphragm with L= 20um, W=5 um and
t=1um. Resistivity(ρ) of p type silicon with 100
orientation =7.8Ω-cm.
R = ρL/A = 7.8 Ω(10-2m) * 20 (10-6m)/5(10-12m)
= 31.2 104 Ω = 312 kΩ
But, usually the resistance value for design is
around 2 kΩ and may vary up to 2.5kΩ.
Sheet Resistance needs to be used
Design Issues of Micro Sensors
10
Sheet Resistance
R = ρ L / A = ρ L / w t = ρ8
L:
= Rs
L:
Sheet resistance is a special case of resistivity for a uniform sheet
thickness. Commonly, resistivity (also known as bulk resistance,
specific electrical resistance, or volume resistivity) is in units of Ω·m,
which is more completely stated in units of Ω·m2/m (Ω·area/length).
When divided by the sheet thickness, 1/m, the units are
Ω·m·(m/m)·1/m = Ω. The term "(m/m)" cancels, but represents a
special "square" situation yielding an answer in ‘ohms’.
An alternative, common unit is "ohms per square" (denoted "Ω/sq" or
" Ω/ "), which is dimensionally equal to an ohm, but is exclusively
used for sheet resistance.
This is an advantage, because sheet resistance of 1 Ω could be
taken out of context and misinterpreted as bulk resistance of 1 ohm,
whereas sheet resistance of 1 Ω/sq cannot thus be misinterpreted.
Design Issues of Micro Sensors
11
Electromagnetism• Faraday’s law governs the induced force (or a motion)
in the wire under the influence of a magnetic field.
• The scaling of electromagnetic force follows: F ∝ S4.
• For electromagnets, as S decreases, these forces decrease because it is difficult to generate large magnetic fields with small coils of wire.
• However permanent magnets maintain their strength as they are scaled down in size, and it is often advantageous to design magnetic systems that use the interaction between an electromagnet and a permanent magnet.
Design Issues of Micro Sensors
12
Fluid MechanicsA: Volumetric Flow Q,
; 3/∆=
8?(
Hence:
; ∝ /
This implies that a reduction of
10 to the radius, will lead to a
10000 time reduction in
volumetric flow.B: Pressure Drop ∆P
@8?ABC(
∆= ∝ 7
A reduction of 10 times in conduit radius leads 1000 times increase in
pressure drop per unit length
Design Issues of Micro Sensors
13
Design Issues of Micro Sensors
14
Benefits Of Scaling
• Speed (Frequency increase, Thermal Time constraints reduce)
• Power Consumption (actuation energy reduce, heating power reduces)
• Robustness (g-force resilience increases)
• Economy (batch fabrication)