View
286
Download
9
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
The level of noise transmitted to the passengers of a vehicle can drastically impact a passenger’s comfort. Brake noise will give the customer an impression of poor product quality and can thus damage the quality image of the company. Within the automotive industry, the study of mode coupling instability by the use of FEM and modal complex analysis is widespread to reduce those phenomenon. In this paper an alternative method is presented, where potential brake noise issues are predicted by the use of a time transient integration using multi-body system analysis. The simulation model contains a non-linear contact description, bushing, flexible bodies and the axis cinematic of the vehicle. Transient results are transformed by Fourier for a frequency domain study. The parameters that can be varied for the prediction analysis are brake pressure, vehicle speed, friction laws, system damping and bushing properties. The advantages of the multi-body system analysis approach are in the direct consideration of the non-linearity’s which are significant within certain frequency ranges. The multi-body system analysis approach also provides a further method to confirm results from the complex modal analysis and thus increases the informational value of the numerical predictions. Simulations variant results will be presented and discussed and enhancements will be proposed.
Citation preview
2014 European Altair Technology Conference
June 24-26, 2014 | Munich, Germany
Join, Contribute, Exchange Brake Noise Simulation
using Multi-Body Simulation Analysis
Dr. Armin Veitl
Benjamin Leblanc
See full agenda: www.altairhtc.com/europe
Copyright © 2012 Altair Engineering, Inc. Proprietary and Confidential. All rights reserved. Copyright © 2012 Altair Engineering, Inc. Proprietary and Confidential. All rights reserved.
Agenda
• Motivation
• Self excited system
• Tribology effects
• Contact modeling
• Model build-up
• Simulation setting with a driving rotation
• Results & discussion
• Planed enhancements
Copyright © 2012 Altair Engineering, Inc. Proprietary and Confidential. All rights reserved. Copyright © 2012 Altair Engineering, Inc. Proprietary and Confidential. All rights reserved.
Motivation
• The level of noise heard within a vehicle’s interior can drastically impact
a passenger’s comfort. Brake noises can give the customer a poor
impression of product quality. Within the C.A.E. industry, the study of
mode coupling instability by the use of F.E.M. and modal complex
analysis, is widespread to reduce those phenomenon.
• An complementary method is presented in this paper where brake noise
issues are predicted by the use of a time transient integration using
multi-body system analysis
Copyright © 2012 Altair Engineering, Inc. Proprietary and Confidential. All rights reserved. Copyright © 2013 Altair Engineering, Inc. Proprietary and Confidential. All rights reserved.
Brake - Vibration and Noise
Judder
Moan
Groan
Low Frequency
Squealing
High Frequency
Squealing
10 100 500 1k 3-4k 10k
Type o
f oscill
ation
forc
ed
s
elf-e
xcited
Frequency [Hz]
Low frequency Effects
High frequency
Effects
Usual application
field for MBD
Domain that we
intend to cover
Copyright © 2012 Altair Engineering, Inc. Proprietary and Confidential. All rights reserved. Copyright © 2012 Altair Engineering, Inc. Proprietary and Confidential. All rights reserved.
Brake - Vibration and Noise
Brake Squeal Issue
CAE model – CAE Labor
Differential Equation of motion
Linearization and Instability
Analysis
Frequency Domain
Results:
Frequency of instability
complex mode shape
Integration of the differential
equation system
Time Domain
Results:
Analyze by Fourier in frequency
domain
time shape animation
Problem Identification /
Engineering a solution
Copyright © 2012 Altair Engineering, Inc. Proprietary and Confidential. All rights reserved. Copyright © 2012 Altair Engineering, Inc. Proprietary and Confidential. All rights reserved.
Self excited system
• Phenomena that leads from
a steady state to an
oscillatory state without
external oscillatory excitation
• Comparison to aero-elasticity
“Limit Cycle Oscillations (LCO)” Excitation system pad ↔ disc (stick-slip effect)
Resonant system suspension
Input: - vehicle speed - brake pressure - friction law
Output: - resonance phenomena - brake noise
Feedback loop: - suspension vibration
self-excited system
LCO pictures source: Wind tunnel analysis of separated aerodynamcis leading to different types of torsional flutter in bluff-bodies,
T. Andrianne – Université of Liège
Animation Gif source: AcuSolve Example – Altair Engineering
constant flow
section from a beam
Copyright © 2012 Altair Engineering, Inc. Proprietary and Confidential. All rights reserved. Copyright © 2012 Altair Engineering, Inc. Proprietary and Confidential. All rights reserved.
Tribology effects
• Tribology is the science of interacting surfaces in relative motion
pictures source: Thèse: Apport des analyses numériques temporelle et fréquentuelle dans l´étude des instabilités de contact, A.Meziane
Animation Gif source: Arnol'd tongues arising from a grazing-sliding bifurcation of a piecewise-smooth system, Szalai, R; Osinga, HM, University of Bristol
self-oscillations that appears due to contact can be
classified in 2 categories:
• stick-slip vibration
• quasi-harmonic vibration
stick-slip vibration
quasi-harmonic vibration
Normal force on pad
Friction force on pad
friction law example
Ft = µ(v).Fn
Copyright © 2012 Altair Engineering, Inc. Proprietary and Confidential. All rights reserved. Copyright © 2012 Altair Engineering, Inc. Proprietary and Confidential. All rights reserved.
Contact modeling
• Friction Law
• Flexibility of the disk
• Flexible surface:
• a marker can slide along the whole
surface
• surface deformation is interpolated
between reference points
• A modal basis provides the stiffness of
the surface. Static correction modes
are not required for the surface
• Static correction modes only used for
the connection to the strut
…
mode 7
mode 8
mode 9
mode 10
mode 11
mode 12
Copyright © 2012 Altair Engineering, Inc. Proprietary and Confidential. All rights reserved. Copyright © 2012 Altair Engineering, Inc. Proprietary and Confidential. All rights reserved.
Contact modeling
• Friction Law
• Flexibility of the disk
• User-Subroutine
• Compute normal force at contact point
• Compute friction force at this point
Python Script: no compilation required
Call of the User-Subroutine in MotionSolve
Copyright © 2012 Altair Engineering, Inc. Proprietary and Confidential. All rights reserved. Copyright © 2012 Altair Engineering, Inc. Proprietary and Confidential. All rights reserved.
Model build-up
Mac-pherson axle system
Strut idealized as one flexible body
control arm
as one flexible body
…
… toe link modeled with a poly-beam
connected with a ball and a constant
velocity joints
All bushings parameterized with
a dataset
Copyright © 2012 Altair Engineering, Inc. Proprietary and Confidential. All rights reserved. Copyright © 2012 Altair Engineering, Inc. Proprietary and Confidential. All rights reserved.
Model build-up
floating brake caliper system
Brake caliper as flexible body
Brake bracket as flexible body
…
…
Brake piston as a rigid body
Brake pads as flexible too
Disk and hub as one flexible body
and
modeled with deformable surface
as shown on a previous slide
Copyright © 2012 Altair Engineering, Inc. Proprietary and Confidential. All rights reserved. Copyright © 2012 Altair Engineering, Inc. Proprietary and Confidential. All rights reserved.
Simulation setting with a driving rotation
• Virtual actuator
• 2 degree of freedom
• Impose rotation
• Constant velocity
• 2 [km/h]
• brake disk free to move
in other directions
• Brake pressure
• Constant 20 [bar]
• Simulation settings
• Transient : 2 [sec]
• Integrator : DSTIFF
constant velocity joint
constant velocity joint
revolute joint attached to GROUND
motion boundary condition
translational joint attached to DISK
Body 1
Body 2
Body 3
Copyright © 2012 Altair Engineering, Inc. Proprietary and Confidential. All rights reserved. Copyright © 2012 Altair Engineering, Inc. Proprietary and Confidential. All rights reserved.
The model in HyperWorks
model database structured with a browser
All contact instance included in is own system
Dataset to manage input parameter
Axle and Brake separated into 2 systems to enable easy model update
Virtual system to rotate wheel
GUI entry to manage simulation variants
Copyright © 2012 Altair Engineering, Inc. Proprietary and Confidential. All rights reserved. Copyright © 2012 Altair Engineering, Inc. Proprietary and Confidential. All rights reserved.
Results & discussion
• Relative speed at contact
point between pad and
disk surface
• Stick-slip characteristic
• increasing area until
constant amplitude
• Stick area
• Slip area
• “quasi-harmonique”
ST
ICK
ST
ICK
ST
ICK
SL
IP
SL
IP
SL
IP
SL
IP
transition
Copyright © 2012 Altair Engineering, Inc. Proprietary and Confidential. All rights reserved. Copyright © 2012 Altair Engineering, Inc. Proprietary and Confidential. All rights reserved.
Results & discussion
Results animation : friction directions are changing when system start vibrating
the displayed forces are applied on pad
Copyright © 2012 Altair Engineering, Inc. Proprietary and Confidential. All rights reserved. Copyright © 2012 Altair Engineering, Inc. Proprietary and Confidential. All rights reserved.
Results & discussion
Results animation : friction directions are changing over time, but system behaves quasi-harmonic
the displayed forces are applied on pad
Copyright © 2012 Altair Engineering, Inc. Proprietary and Confidential. All rights reserved. Copyright © 2012 Altair Engineering, Inc. Proprietary and Confidential. All rights reserved.
Results & discussion
• Acceleration time history can be filtered by Fourier and displayed in water fall
diagram in a frequency range from [0 – 4000 Hz]
• Critical frequencies appear in the diagram and can be compared to component
normal frequency or complex modes 1 3 2
Copyright © 2012 Altair Engineering, Inc. Proprietary and Confidential. All rights reserved. Copyright © 2012 Altair Engineering, Inc. Proprietary and Confidential. All rights reserved.
Results & discussion
Results animation : scale 500 in deformation, deformation shapes can be compared to normal modes
or to complex modes analysis
Copyright © 2012 Altair Engineering, Inc. Proprietary and Confidential. All rights reserved. Copyright © 2012 Altair Engineering, Inc. Proprietary and Confidential. All rights reserved.
Results & discussion
• Brake Noise Simulation: Resume of the CAE-Knowledge
• Finite element modal complex
• Multi-body
FFT‘s
1
Copyright © 2012 Altair Engineering, Inc. Proprietary and Confidential. All rights reserved. Copyright © 2012 Altair Engineering, Inc. Proprietary and Confidential. All rights reserved.
Results & discussion
• Brake Noise Simulation: Resume of the CAE-Knowledge
• Finite element modal complex
• Multi-body
Instable mode animation with FE modal
complex (Frequency domain)
Time animation with Multi-body Simulation
1
Copyright © 2012 Altair Engineering, Inc. Proprietary and Confidential. All rights reserved. Copyright © 2012 Altair Engineering, Inc. Proprietary and Confidential. All rights reserved.
Process Implementation
pictures source: http://www.ganttproject.biz
GanttProject is a cross-platform desktop tool for project scheduling and management.
• Implementation in vehicle development
• build on existing CAE information: no double effort to invest
• win twice more information on the same project
• CAE tasks can be performed in parallel and validate each other
• increase CAE predictivity / reporting value from CAE Labor
Copyright © 2012 Altair Engineering, Inc. Proprietary and Confidential. All rights reserved. Copyright © 2012 Altair Engineering, Inc. Proprietary and Confidential. All rights reserved.
Results & discussion
• Summary
• multi-body simulation method enable self excited system simulation
• “Stick-Slip” characteristics clearly shown
• frequency responses appear in the expected range [0Hz – 4000 Hz]
• the method matured for vehicle development
• enable comparison with modal complex analyze / reciprocal validation of CAE
• Planed enhancements
• Post-processing tools to more easily identify the critical peak
• Automation to enable better model build-up