38
SAFETY PERFORMANCE OF WORK-ZONE DEVICES UNDER MASH TESTING Karla Lechtenberg Midwest Roadside Safety Facility Nebraska Transportation Center University of Nebraska-Lincoln June 2012

2012 MATC Spring Lecture Series: Karla Lechtenberg

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: 2012 MATC Spring Lecture Series: Karla Lechtenberg

SAFETY PERFORMANCE OF WORK-ZONE DEVICES UNDER MASH

TESTING

Karla LechtenbergMidwest Roadside Safety FacilityNebraska Transportation CenterUniversity of Nebraska-Lincoln

June 2012

Page 2: 2012 MATC Spring Lecture Series: Karla Lechtenberg

Midwest Roadside Safety Facility

Outline

• 3-5 learning objectives…

Page 3: 2012 MATC Spring Lecture Series: Karla Lechtenberg

Midwest Roadside Safety Facility

Background

• NCHRP Report No. 350• Crash test conditions at Test-Level 3 (TL-3)

– 1,808-lb small car (820C) • 22 mph• 62 mph

– Normally tested at 0°and 90° orientations

– 4,409-lb pickup truck (2000P) not used

0°Orientation

90°Orientation

Page 4: 2012 MATC Spring Lecture Series: Karla Lechtenberg

Midwest Roadside Safety Facility

Problem Statement

• Work zone signs only tested with small car• Systems tuned for small car• Simulated pickup truck tests indicated failure• MASH requires pickup truck testing• Current WZ sign systems may not meet MASH

Page 5: 2012 MATC Spring Lecture Series: Karla Lechtenberg

Midwest Roadside Safety Facility

Pickup Truck Bogie Testing

Potential for sign to penetrate windshield5

Page 6: 2012 MATC Spring Lecture Series: Karla Lechtenberg

Midwest Roadside Safety Facility

Research Objectives

• Determine if current WZ sign systems meet MASH• Identify WZ hardware parameters that increase propensity for failure• Provide guidelines and recommendations

Page 7: 2012 MATC Spring Lecture Series: Karla Lechtenberg

Midwest Roadside Safety Facility

Research Plan

• Analytical study– Evaluate all full-scale tests– Study individual hardware parameters– Select work zone sign systems with a propensity for failure

• Conduct 4 full-scale tests– 2 small car and 2 pickup truck– 2 systems per test

Page 8: 2012 MATC Spring Lecture Series: Karla Lechtenberg

Midwest Roadside Safety Facility

Previous Testing

• Small Car Crash Tests– 157 full scale

• Pickup Truck Tests– 157 full scale – 18 bogie tests

Page 9: 2012 MATC Spring Lecture Series: Karla Lechtenberg

Midwest Roadside Safety Facility

System Parameters

Page 10: 2012 MATC Spring Lecture Series: Karla Lechtenberg

Midwest Roadside Safety Facility

Methods of Failure

• Severe Windshield Cracking and Failure• Windshield Indentation ≥ 3 inches• Windshield Penetration• Other Occupant Compartment Penetration• Roof Deformation ≥ 4 inches

Page 11: 2012 MATC Spring Lecture Series: Karla Lechtenberg

Midwest Roadside Safety Facility

Vehicle Parameters

  Vehicle Parameter 820C 1100C 2000P 2270P

Hood Length [in.] 31.5 34.7 45.1 41

Height to bumper [in.] 18 18 26 27

Height to roof [in.] 58 55.5 73.3 75.8

Windshield Angle 39° 32° 42° 34°

Windshield Length [in.] 30.2 28.1 26.8 31.5

Page 12: 2012 MATC Spring Lecture Series: Karla Lechtenberg

Midwest Roadside Safety Facility

Predicted Performance

• Sign trajectory• Vehicle geometry• Classified by risk of failure

– 1: 75-100% – 2: 50-75% – 3: 25-50% – 4: 0-25%

Page 13: 2012 MATC Spring Lecture Series: Karla Lechtenberg

Midwest Roadside Safety Facility

Important Parameters for Failure

≥50% of systems with a parameter were predicted to fail for either vehicle• Both Vehicles

– Height to top of mast– Sign panel material– Mast stages– Mast material– Flag staff material– Orientation

• Car Only– Height to top of flags– Sign-locking mechanism

• Truck Only– Base layout

13

Page 14: 2012 MATC Spring Lecture Series: Karla Lechtenberg

Midwest Roadside Safety Facility

System Analysis

• Systems that were predicted to fail MASH by:– Windshield penetration – Other occupant compartment penetration– Roof deformation

• Analyzed systems based on combinations of important parameters

Page 15: 2012 MATC Spring Lecture Series: Karla Lechtenberg

Midwest Roadside Safety Facility

Critical Parameters for 2270P Test Failure

Low-Mounting Height• X-footprint base

– Spring base– Aluminum and vinyl panel – 0 and 90 degree orientations– With flags

• Parallel Dual Uprights– Aluminum panel– 0 degree orientation– Without flags

High-Mounting Height• X-footprint base

– Spring base or slipbase– Aluminum panel– 90 degree orientation– With flags

• Parallel Dual Uprights– Aluminum panel– 90 degree orientation– Without flags

Page 16: 2012 MATC Spring Lecture Series: Karla Lechtenberg

Midwest Roadside Safety Facility

Critical Parameters for 1100C Test Failure

Low-Mounting Height• X-footprint base

– Spring base– Flags– Aluminum panel @ 0 degree

orientation– Vinyl panel @ 90 degree

orientation

Low-Mounting Height• Parallel Dual Uprights

– Aluminum Panel– 0 and 90 degree orientations– No flags

Page 17: 2012 MATC Spring Lecture Series: Karla Lechtenberg

Midwest Roadside Safety Facility

Crash Testing Requirements

• MASH Test Level 3 Criteria– 5,000 lb pickup truck, 62 mph– 2,425 lb small passenger car, 62 mph

• Evaluation Criteria– Structural Adequacy– Occupant Risk– Vehicle Trajectory

Page 18: 2012 MATC Spring Lecture Series: Karla Lechtenberg

Midwest Roadside Safety Facility

Full-Scale Crash Testing

• 4 small car tests at 62 mph (Test Designation No. 3-71)• 4 pickup truck tests at 62 mph (Test Designation No. 3-72)

Page 19: 2012 MATC Spring Lecture Series: Karla Lechtenberg

Midwest Roadside Safety Facility

WZ09-1A

Page 20: 2012 MATC Spring Lecture Series: Karla Lechtenberg

Midwest Roadside Safety Facility

WZ09-1A

• FAILURE

Page 21: 2012 MATC Spring Lecture Series: Karla Lechtenberg

Midwest Roadside Safety Facility

WZ09-1B

Page 22: 2012 MATC Spring Lecture Series: Karla Lechtenberg

Midwest Roadside Safety Facility

WZ09-1B

• FAILURE

Page 23: 2012 MATC Spring Lecture Series: Karla Lechtenberg

Midwest Roadside Safety Facility

WZ09-2A

Page 24: 2012 MATC Spring Lecture Series: Karla Lechtenberg

Midwest Roadside Safety Facility

WZ09-2A

• PASS

Page 25: 2012 MATC Spring Lecture Series: Karla Lechtenberg

Midwest Roadside Safety Facility

WZ09-2B

Page 26: 2012 MATC Spring Lecture Series: Karla Lechtenberg

Midwest Roadside Safety Facility

WZ09-2B

• FAILURE

Page 27: 2012 MATC Spring Lecture Series: Karla Lechtenberg

Midwest Roadside Safety Facility

WZ09-3A

Page 28: 2012 MATC Spring Lecture Series: Karla Lechtenberg

Midwest Roadside Safety Facility

WZ09-3A

• FAILURE

Page 29: 2012 MATC Spring Lecture Series: Karla Lechtenberg

Midwest Roadside Safety Facility

WZ09-3B

Page 30: 2012 MATC Spring Lecture Series: Karla Lechtenberg

Midwest Roadside Safety Facility

WZ09-3B

• PASS

Page 31: 2012 MATC Spring Lecture Series: Karla Lechtenberg

Midwest Roadside Safety Facility

WZ09-4A

Page 32: 2012 MATC Spring Lecture Series: Karla Lechtenberg

Midwest Roadside Safety Facility

WZ09-4A

• FAILURE– Windshield penetration– Floorboard penetration

Page 33: 2012 MATC Spring Lecture Series: Karla Lechtenberg

Midwest Roadside Safety Facility

WZ09-4B

Page 34: 2012 MATC Spring Lecture Series: Karla Lechtenberg

Midwest Roadside Safety Facility

WZ09-4B

• PASS

Page 35: 2012 MATC Spring Lecture Series: Karla Lechtenberg

Midwest Roadside Safety Facility

Test Summary

• 3 of the 8 systems passed MASH evaluation criteria– 3 of the 4 systems failed with the pickup truck– 2 of the 4 systems failed with the small car

• Comparing systems with similar parameters can be difficult

Page 36: 2012 MATC Spring Lecture Series: Karla Lechtenberg

Midwest Roadside Safety Facility

Important for MASH Failure

Parameter Pickup Truck Small Car Sign Panel Material Aluminum Aluminum

Height to Top of Mast 75-135 in. 59-110 in.

Presence of Flags Without FlagsWith and Without

Flags

OrientationBoth 0 and 90

degreesBoth 0 and 90

degreesSign Locking Mechanism NA Rigid BracketsBase Layout X-footprint NA

Designers cautioned against using important parameters

Page 37: 2012 MATC Spring Lecture Series: Karla Lechtenberg

Midwest Roadside Safety Facility

Design Aides

1Breakaway Mechanism Height: Low ≤ 24”, High > 24” or no breakaway mechanism2Chance of Failing MASH: 1 - 75 to 100%, 2 – 50 to 75%, 3 – 25 to 50%, 4 – 0 to 25%, 5 – Unknown

1

2

Page 38: 2012 MATC Spring Lecture Series: Karla Lechtenberg

Slide design © 2009, Mid-America Transportation Center. All rights reserved.

Center for Transportation Research Education at Iowa StateMid-America Transportation CenterPrivate Industry

For more information, the report can be found:http://www.intrans.iastate.edu/smartwz/details.cfm?projectID=82

CREDITS