Upload
trec-at-psu
View
924
Download
1
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
**Revised thanks to participant feedback** As agencies looking to improve bicycle and pedestrian infrastructure have learned, it doesn’t count if it’s not counted. Counting provides information on the level of intersections, paths and roadways—data already available for motor vehicles but lacking for non-motorized travelers. For the first time, Federal Highway Administration’s Traffic Monitoring Guide now includes a chapter detailing how to monitor bicycle and pedestrian traffic. These slides explain how to create a robust bicycle and pedestrian count program based on the new guidance. Agencies that show clear evidence of use are more likely to receive funding for projects, so join us and learn how to improve your existing count program or create a new one. Webinar youtube video can be seen at: http://youtu.be/PXzcJRvwPmc
Citation preview
We are Traffic: Creating Robust Bicycle and Pedestrian Count Programs
Krista Nordback, Ph.D., P.E.Oregon Transportation Research and Education Consortium
(OTREC)
Overview
• Introduction• Traffic Monitoring Programs• Non-Motorized Count Programs• Conclusions & Recommendations
INTRODUCTION
Why measure walking & biking?
Why measure walking & biking?
If we don’t count it, it doesn’t count.
Why measure walking & biking?
• Funding & policy decisions• To show change over time• Facility design• Planning (short-term, long-term, regional…)
• Economic impact• Public health• Safety
How many bike and walk?
• Surveys– National– Regional– Local
• Counts– Permanent– Short duration
What good are counts?
• Funding!• Facility Level– Change Over Time– Planning and Design– Safety Analysis
• Validate Regional Models• Prioritize Projects• Bicycle Miles Traveled
(BMT)
Signal Timing
Vehicle Delay
Kothuri, S. M., Reynolds, T., Monsere, C. M., & Koonce, P. (2013). Testing Strategies to Reduce Pedestrian Delay at Signalized Intersections. A Pilot Study in Portland, OR. Paper presented at the 92nd Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C.
Signal Timing
Vehicle Delay
Kothuri, S. M., Reynolds, T., Monsere, C. M., & Koonce, P. (2013). Testing Strategies to Reduce Pedestrian Delay at Signalized Intersections. A Pilot Study in Portland, OR. Paper presented at the 92nd Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C.
Pedestrian
What?
People actually bike here?
Yes! 200 per day
What? People actually walk here?
Yes!
400 per day
TRAFFIC MONITORINGPROGRAMS
State Traffic Monitoring
Metro Count Accessed 6/13/13 http://mtehelp.tech-metrocount.com/article.aspx?key=mc5805
Commonly inductive loops
Permanent Counters
Short Duration CountersCommonly pneumatic tubes
Colorado’s Permanent Counters
Annual Average Daily Traffic (AADT)
PERMANENT COUNT
PROGRAM
Colorado’s Short Duration Traffic Counts
CDOT OTIS Accessed 6/18/13 http://dtdapps.coloradodot.info/Otis/HighwayData#/ui/0/1/criteria/~/184.667/210.864
AADT
PERMANENT COUNT PROGRAM
SHORT DURATION
COUNT PROGRAM
AADT
PERMANENT COUNT PROGRAM
APPLY FACTORS
SHORT DURATION
COUNT PROGRAM
AADT
PERMANENT COUNT PROGRAM
APPLY FACTORS
SHORT DURATION
COUNT PROGRAM
AADT
PERMANENT COUNT PROGRAM
APPLY FACTORS
SHORT DURATION
COUNT PROGRAM
Use AADT to Estimate VMT
Sum (AADT X Segment Length) over network to compute Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT)
COLORADO HIGHWAYS
Can we apply these methods to biking and
walking?
AADB: Annual Average Daily Bicyclists
AADT for bicyclists!
Traffic Monitoring Guide 2013:
Chapter 4 for Non-motorized Traffic
NON-MOTORIZED COUNT PROGRAMS
The TMG 2013 Approach
The TMG 2013 Approach
National Bicycle and Pedestrian Documentation Project
Manual Counts: 2 hours 5 to 7pm Tues, Wed, or Thurs in mid-September
http://bikepeddocumentation.org/
Passive Infrared Counters
Inductive loop counters in bike lanes
Combined Bicycle and Pedestrian Continuous Counter
Permanent Counters• Pedestrian
• Bicycle
InfraredVideo Image Recognition
Radar
Pressure Sensor
Inductive Loop Video Detection
Video Image Recognition
Microwave
Magnetometers
The TMG 2013 Approach
Permanent Count
Program
Permanent Count
Program
Geographic/Climate Zones
Urban vs. Rural
Annual Average Daily Bicyclists (AADB)
Volume Categories
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900
AADB
Conti
nuou
s Co
unt S
tatio
ns Medium
High
600
200
Low
Traffic Monitoring Guide 2013 Update, Chapter 4.
Permanent Count
Program
Daily Patterns
Sunday
Monday
Tuesday
Wednesd
ay
Thursday
Friday
Saturday
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
120%
140%
160%
180%
% o
f AAD
B
Colorado Example (Bikes only)
Hourly Commute Pattern
12:00 AM
1:00 AM
2:00 AM
3:00 AM
4:00 AM
5:00 AM
6:00 AM
7:00 AM
8:00 AM
9:00 AM
10:00 AM
11:00 AM
12:00 PM
1:00 PM
2:00 PM
3:00 PM
4:00 PM
5:00 PM
6:00 PM
7:00 PM
8:00 PM
9:00 PM
10:00 PM
11:00 PM0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
% o
f AAD
B
City of Boulder Example (Bikes only)
Hourly Non-commute Pattern
0:001:00
2:003:00
4:005:00
6:007:00
8:009:00
10:0011:00
12:0013:00
14:0015:00
16:0017:00
18:0019:00
20:0021:00
22:0023:00
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
Ave
rage
Hou
rly
Volu
me
Source: Pam Johnson, PSU
Permanent Count
Program
12 Possible groups
Commute
Non-Commute
In Between
3 Daily Patterns
12 Possible groups
Commute
Non-Commute
In Between
3 Daily Patterns 2 Weekly Patterns
Commute
Non-Commute
12 Possible groups
Commute
Non-Commute
In Between
3 Daily Patterns 2 Weekly Patterns
Commute
Non-Commute
2 Annual Patterns
Commute
Non-Commute
12 Possible groups
Commute
Non-Commute
In Between
3 Daily Patterns 2 Weekly Patterns
Commute
Non-Commute
2 Annual Patterns
Commute
Non-Commute
12 Possible groups
Commute
Non-Commute
In Between
3 Daily Patterns 2 Weekly Patterns
Commute
Non-Commute
2 Annual Patterns
Commute
Non-Commute
12 Possible groups
Commute
Non-Commute
In Between
3 Daily Patterns 2 Weekly Patterns
Commute
Non-Commute
2 Annual Patterns
Commute
Non-Commute
CommuteCommute
Urban PlainsNon-commuteUrban Plains
Non-commute
Mountain Non-commute
Mountain Non-commuteHigher
Week-ends?
Higher Week-ends?
Rural Mtn Trail?
Rural Mtn Trail?
Weekly PatternWeekly Pattern
LocationLocation
YesYes
NoNo
Permanent Count
Program
Factoring MethodAdapted from Traffic Monitoring Guide
AADB = Cknown* D * M
Cknown = 24-hour count
D = Daily FactorM = Monthly Factor
Factoring MethodAdapted from Traffic Monitoring Guide
AADB = Cknown* D * M
Cknown = 24-hour count
D = Daily FactorM = Monthly Factor
Monthly Factor
M = AADBMADB
whereMADB = Ave daily bike count in that month
Monthly Factor
M = AADBMADB
whereMADB = Ave daily bike count in that month
June
= 5001,000
Monthly Factor
M = AADBMADB
whereMADB = Ave daily bike count in that month
June
= 5001,000
= 0.5
Monthly Factor
M = AADBMADB
whereMADB = Ave daily bike count in that month
June
= 5001,000
= 0.5
Daily counts in June are twice AADB.
Groups:Mountain
Non-Commute
Front Range Non-
Commute CommuteJanuary 3.9 1.5
February 3.2 2.0March 1.3 1.2April 2.2 1.1 1.1May 1.0 0.8 0.9June 0.5 0.8 0.7July 0.4 0.8 0.8
August 0.5 0.7 0.7September 0.7 0.8 0.8
October 1.7 1.0 1.0November 1.5 1.4December 2.5 2.3
Colorado Monthly Factors
Permanent Count
Program
How many counters/group?
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 140%
10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%
100%
Non-Commute Factors
Commute Counters
Average
Number of Counters
Prec
isio
n of
Mon
thly
Fac
tors
Permanent Count
Program
The TMG 2013 Approach
Time
The TMG 2013 Approach
Time
Space
The TMG 2013 Approach
Short Duration
Count Program
Short Duration
Count Program
Turning Movement Counts
Segment Count
A
B
Short Duration Counters• Pedestrian
• BicycleInfraredManual
Manual Pneumatic Tube Counters
Traffic Monitoring Guide 2013 Update, Chapter 4.
Short Duration
Count Program
Potential Selection Criteria
• Variety of facility types
Path On-street
Potential Selection Criteria
• Variety of land uses– Central business district
– Residential
– School/University
• Technology related criteria
Short Duration
Count Program
Count Duration
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 7000%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
Count Duration (hours)
% E
rror
of A
AD
B Es
timat
es
Count Duration
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 7000%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
Count Duration (hours)
% E
rror
of A
AD
B Es
timat
es
1 week
Short Duration
Count Program
Schedule Counts
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 120%
10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%
100%
Month
Abso
lute
% E
rror
in A
ADB
Estim
ates
Schedule Counts
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 120%
10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%
100%
Month
Abso
lute
% E
rror
in A
ADT
Estim
ate
May to October bestfor Midwestern Climate
The TMG 2013 Approach
Factoring MethodAdapted from Traffic Monitoring Guide
AADB = Cknown* D * M
Cknown = 24-hour count
D = Daily FactorM = Monthly Factor
AADB
VMT for
bicycles
CONCLUSIONS & RECOMMENDATIONS
Summary
• Traffic Monitoring Guide Approach:– Permanent Count
Program– Short Duration Count
Program– Compute AADT for Bikes
and Pedestrians
Recommendations
• Both permanent and short duration count programs are needed.
• Continuous counters are needed! • Prefer 1 week short count • Short duration counts in high volume months– May to October (Midwestern climates)
• Integrate bike/ped counts into traffic data for preservation and access
Balance Permanent and Short Duration Programs
PERMANENT COUNT PROGRAM
SHORT DURATION
COUNT PROGRAM
Iterative Process
Iterative Process
Example
1st Year
PERMANENT COUNT PROGRAM
SHORT DURATION
COUNT PROGRAM
1 Permanent Counter 20 Manual Count Sites
2nd Year
PERMANENT COUNT PROGRAM
SHORT DURATION
COUNT PROGRAM
1 Permanent Counter 12 Automated Short Duration Sites (one week per site + transfer time)
Rotate 1 counter all summer
3rd Year
PERMANENT COUNT
PROGRAM
SHORT DURATION
COUNT PROGRAM
5 Permanent Counters 24 Automated Short Duration Sites (one week per site + transfer time)
Rotate 2 counters all summer
4th Year
PERMANENT COUNT
PROGRAM
SHORT DURATION COUNT PROGRAM
6 Permanent Counters 60 Automated Short Duration Sites (one week per site + transfer time)
Rotate 5 counters all summer
10th Year
PERMANENT COUNT PROGRAM
SHORT DURATION COUNT PROGRAM
14 Permanent Counters 360 Automated Short Duration Sites (one week per site) on 3 year rotation
Rotate 10 counters all summer on 3 year rotation
On-going Work• Colorado, Vermont, Minnesota, Oregon, North Carolina,
Washington State DOT’s are developing programs.• TRB Bike/Ped Data Subcommittee https://
sites.google.com/site/bikepeddata/home
• FHWA to include bike/ped counts in Travel Monitoring Analysis System (TMAS)
• NCHRP 07-19: Bike/Ped Data Methods & Technologies• Google Group for future discussion!• OTREC’s Bike/Ped Data Archive
TRB Bike/Ped Data Subcommittee
Questions?Krista Nordback
Guide to Bicycle & Pedestrian Count Programshttp://www.pdx.edu/ibpi/count