Upload
trec-at-psu
View
240
Download
2
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
OVERVIEW PRESENTATION / 1OVERVIEW PRESENTATION / 1
OVERVIEW PRESENTATION / 2
Part 1: Background & overview
OVERVIEW PRESENTATION / 3
What is parking like in San Francisco?
OVERVIEW PRESENTATION / 4
Demonstrating a new approach to parking
OVERVIEW PRESENTATION / 5
Part 2: Preparations
OVERVIEW PRESENTATION / 6
Parking census
OVERVIEW PRESENTATION / 7
Inventory/asset management
OVERVIEW PRESENTATION / 8
Framing and messaging
OVERVIEW PRESENTATION / 9
Identity and brand management
OVERVIEW PRESENTATION / 10
Part 3: Implementation
OVERVIEW PRESENTATION / 11
Coin and card meters
OVERVIEW PRESENTATION / 12
Parking sensors
OVERVIEW PRESENTATION / 13
Pricing at parking meters and lots• Demand responsive to find lowest possible prices • Gradual and periodic changes: $0.25 up or down every 4-6 weeks • Time of day pricing (vary by block + weekday/end)
OVERVIEW PRESENTATION / 14
Demand responsive rate adjustments
OVERVIEW PRESENTATION / 15
Real-time information
OVERVIEW PRESENTATION / 16
Pricing at SFpark parking garages
OVERVIEW PRESENTATION / 17
Wayfinding signs
OVERVIEW PRESENTATION / 18
Variable message signs
OVERVIEW PRESENTATION / 19
Part 4: Operation
OVERVIEW PRESENTATION / 20
Investment in data management/analytical tools
OVERVIEW PRESENTATION / 21
Acquire + understand + clean + structure data
OVERVIEW PRESENTATION / 22
Part 5: Evaluation
OVERVIEW PRESENTATION / 23
Automatic data• Supply data (census, asset management, street closures)• Parking data (from sensors, meters, and citations)• Garage data (usage by hour)• Travel demand data (roadway sensors, highways PEMS, BART, Muni) • Muni data (travel time data from APCs)• Parking tax• Sales tax• Safety (SWITIRS collision data)• Exogenous (fuel price, CPI, unemployment, precipitation)
Manual data• Parking search time• Double parking and disabled placard• Intercept surveys (professional survey firm)
OVERVIEW PRESENTATION / 24
How did rates change?
OVERVIEW PRESENTATION / 25
Was it easier to park?
OVERVIEW PRESENTATION / 26
Was it easier to park?
OVERVIEW PRESENTATION / 27
Secondary benefits we expected• Easier to pay and avoid citations• Easier to find a parking space • Parking spaces better utilized• Less circling• Less vehicle miles travelled• Decreased greenhouse gas emissions• Decreased double parking• Improve Muni speed• Supported economic vitality and safety
OVERVIEW PRESENTATION / 28
Easier to pay and avoid citations
OVERVIEW PRESENTATION / 29
Easier to find a parking space
OVERVIEW PRESENTATION / 30
Decreased vehicle miles travelled
OVERVIEW PRESENTATION / 31
Decreased greenhouse gas emissions
OVERVIEW PRESENTATION / 32
Decreased double parking
OVERVIEW PRESENTATION / 33
Improved Muni speed
OVERVIEW PRESENTATION / 34
Supported economic vitality and safety
OVERVIEW PRESENTATION / 35
Additional findings
OVERVIEW PRESENTATION / 36
Part 5: What’s next & lessons learned
OVERVIEW PRESENTATION / 37
What’s next• Monitor first rate change using only meter payment data• Finish upgrading meters citywide• Disseminate overview, evaluation, and technical manual • Develop proposal for expanding the SFpark approach to
remaining SFMTA meters, lots, and garages
OVERVIEW PRESENTATION / 38
Lessons learned• What worked well
– Large investment in communication and customer experience – Transparent, rules-based, and data-driven process– Data sharing + openness– Clear goals and policies
• What was challenging– This approach is very IT intensive– Parking sensors are a nascent product/industry– Culture change takes time
• Recognizing parking management as tool • Emphasizing availability rather than turnover
OVERVIEW PRESENTATION / 39
Learn more
OVERVIEW PRESENTATION / 40
Kathryn Doherty-Chapman
For more information on SFpark contact:Steph [email protected]
Thank you