19
The 2011 e-assessment question conference The impact of innovation on regulation and of regulation on innovation Julie Swan 31 March 2011

The 2011 e-assessment question conference

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

The 2011 e-assessment question conference: The impact of innovation on regulation and of regulation on innovation

Citation preview

Page 1: The 2011 e-assessment question conference

The 2011 e-assessment questionconference

The impact of innovation on regulation and of regulation on innovation

Julie Swan31 March 2011

Page 2: The 2011 e-assessment question conference

Overview

Ofqual

Innovation and regulation

A new approach to regulation

Challenges of e-assessment

Ofqual’s principles and e-assessment

Page 3: The 2011 e-assessment question conference

Ofqual

Statutory independent regulator

Why regulate?

Ofqual’s statutory objectives include: – Qualifications standards– Public confidence– Efficiency

Page 4: The 2011 e-assessment question conference

Many statutory duties

Including duty to have regard to:– the desirability of facilitating innovation in connection with

the provision of regulated qualifications

Page 5: The 2011 e-assessment question conference

Regulation and innovation

BERR Economics paper – Regulation and innovation: evidence and policy implications, December 2008

Page 6: The 2011 e-assessment question conference

BERR findings

‘The relationship between regulation and innovation is complex, multi-dimensional, ambiguous and dynamic’

Page 7: The 2011 e-assessment question conference

Types of innovation

Product innovation

Process innovation

Marketing innovation

Organisational innovation

Page 8: The 2011 e-assessment question conference

Intervention through the regulatory framework

Introduction of new regulations

Revisions to current regulations

Removal of existing regulations

Page 9: The 2011 e-assessment question conference

Prescriptive vs outcome-based regulation

Prescriptive approach to regulation - sets out how businesses must behave to achieve the required outcomes of regulation

Outcomes based regulation – only stipulates the desired outcome, not how businesses should achieve it

Page 10: The 2011 e-assessment question conference

Prescriptive approach

Limits flexibility

May therefore limit innovation

But may also offer certainty – which might encourage innovation

Page 11: The 2011 e-assessment question conference

Outcomes-based regulation

Offers greater flexibility and freedom

Therefore more scope for innovation

But businesses might be discouraged from innovating because of risk of non-compliance

Page 12: The 2011 e-assessment question conference

Other factors

Too little time to respond to regulatory requirements can inhibit ability to innovate

Money spent on compliance instead of innovation

Policy certainty – too much certainty can result in only minimum compliance

Excessive uncertainty - can cause inaction

Page 13: The 2011 e-assessment question conference

BERR advice

Favour regulatory approaches that are:– outcomes-focused– technology neutral

– As these give greater freedom to innovate

Page 14: The 2011 e-assessment question conference

Regulating awarding organisations and qualifications

Ofqual is introducing a more strategic approach to regulation

More outcomes and less rules-based

Undertaking a stock-take on drivers and inhibiters of innovation

Page 15: The 2011 e-assessment question conference

Challenge

How to facilitate innovation AND secure consistency of standards, public confidence in qualifications and efficiency

Page 16: The 2011 e-assessment question conference

Pen and paper must go, says Ofqual Head – TES headline, Feb 2011

Will traditional written exams be invalid for ‘digitally native’ pupils?

Interesting responses……

Page 17: The 2011 e-assessment question conference

Ofqual’s principles

The interests of learners are paramount

Fitness for purpose is key to quality

Each awarding organisation is responsible for its qualifications

Page 18: The 2011 e-assessment question conference

Ofqual’s principles and e-assessment

Content and potential for progression must be clear

There must be a consistent approach to standards for all qualifications

Qualifications must offer value for money

We must learn lessons from the past

Page 19: The 2011 e-assessment question conference

Summary

A new regulatory approach

Will it facilitate innovation?

Must secure qualification standards, public confidence and efficiency

Will innovation help meet Ofqual’s principles?