55
1 Dathan.C.S

Soil separability through remote sensing for land evaluation

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Soil separability through remote sensing for land evaluation

1

Dathan.C.S

Page 2: Soil separability through remote sensing for land evaluation

2

IntroductionBeing a part of the Earth’s spheres, the

pedosphere is responding and contributing to the environmental changes

(Macías and Arbestain, 2010)

Page 3: Soil separability through remote sensing for land evaluation

3

Page 4: Soil separability through remote sensing for land evaluation

4

‘Assessment of land performance when used for a specified purpose, involving the execution and interpretation of surveys and studies of land forms, soils, vegetation, climate and other aspects of land in order to identify and make a comparison of promising kinds of land use in terms applicable to the objectives of the evaluation’. (FAO, 1976)

Land evaluation

Page 5: Soil separability through remote sensing for land evaluation

5

SOIL SEPARABILITY THROUGH REMOTE SENSING FOR LAND

EVALUATION

Page 6: Soil separability through remote sensing for land evaluation

6

“The creation of spatial soil information by the use of field and laboratory observation methods coupled with spatial and non spatial soil inference systems.”

(Grunwald, 2010)

Digital Soil Mapping (DSM)

Page 7: Soil separability through remote sensing for land evaluation

7

-Remote sensing deals with data collected by electromagnetic energy -Distribution of the continuum of radiant energy can be plotted as a

function of wavelength (or frequency) and is known as the electromagnetic radiation (EMR) spectrum

Remote sensing- A basic overview

Page 8: Soil separability through remote sensing for land evaluation

8

The Foundation of RSEnergy interactions with earth surface features

Basic interactions between electro magnetic energy and an Earth Surface feature

Energy balance equation EI() = ER() + EA() + ET()

1

11

Page 9: Soil separability through remote sensing for land evaluation

9

Seven Elements of Remote Sensing

A. Energy Source or Illumination

B. Radiation and atmosphere

C. Interaction with target

D. Recording of Energy by the Sensor

E . Transmission, Reception, and Processing

F. Interpretation and analysis

G. Application

Page 10: Soil separability through remote sensing for land evaluation

10

• Source of energy is Sun or earth

• Remote sensing systems which measure energy that is naturally available are called passive sensors

• Operate in the VIS, IR and micro wave portions EMREg - Landsat

Types of remote sensing-Passive

Page 11: Soil separability through remote sensing for land evaluation

11

• Source of energy is part of the remote sensor system

• Active sensors provide their own energy source for illumination

• Operate in the microwave portion of EMR

Eg. Radar, Lidar

Types of remote sensing- Active

Page 12: Soil separability through remote sensing for land evaluation

12

Region Wavelength RemarksGamma rays 3x10-5

Not available for RS. Absorbed by moistureX rays 3x10-5 - 3x10-3

UV rays 0.03-0.4 Between 0.03 and 0.4 is called photographic UV band. Not used for RS.

Visible 0.4 – 0.7

Used for RSInfrared 0.7 - 100

Micro wave 103 - 106

Radio 106 Longest wave length. Used for remote sensing by some RADARS

EMR-Spectrum characteristics

Page 13: Soil separability through remote sensing for land evaluation

13

The Foundation of RS

Spectral signatures – Each object on earth has a particular reflectance or emittance when exposed to a particular region of the EMR. This would be unique to that object which is called its spectral signature.

Bands - Each sensor in a satellite contain wavelength ranges in which information in the form of spectral signatures are stored. This is band. A sensor can have many bands of the EMS.

Page 14: Soil separability through remote sensing for land evaluation

14

The Foundation of RSAtmospheric windows-Atmospheric window is that portion of the electromagnetic spectrum that can be transmitted through the atmosphere with least distortion or absorption.

Spatial resolution - Spatial resolution states about the clarity of an image.

Page 15: Soil separability through remote sensing for land evaluation

Idava, Kollam. Toposheet (1 : 25 000)

Spectral signatures

Page 16: Soil separability through remote sensing for land evaluation

16Idava, Kollam. Google Earth. True color composite

Spectral signatures

Page 17: Soil separability through remote sensing for land evaluation

17

Idava, Kollam. Satellite imagery (LISS II ). False color composite

Spectral signatures

Page 18: Soil separability through remote sensing for land evaluation

18Idava, kollam. Satellite imagery (LISS II ). Grey color composite

Spectral signatures

Page 19: Soil separability through remote sensing for land evaluation

19

RS technologies - Optical sensors (a) Hyperspectral imaging

Hyperspectral imaging: Passive RS technology, acquiring simultaneous images in many spectrally contiguous, registered bands such that for each pixel a reflectance spectrum can be derived.

Page 20: Soil separability through remote sensing for land evaluation

20

Optical sensors(b) Multi spectral imaging- Passive RS

Multi spectral imaging - Record data in fewer bands, resulting in a coarser spectral resolution compared to hyper spectral sensors.

Page 21: Soil separability through remote sensing for land evaluation

21

RADAR sensorsActive & Passive

Radar - Both systems are highly suitable to quantify soil moisture, whereas active systems are additionally used to derive terrain and soil attributes.

Page 22: Soil separability through remote sensing for land evaluation

22

LIDAR sensors - Active(Light Detection And Ranging)

LIDAR-is a surveying technology that measures distance by illuminating a target with a laser light. LiDAR (Light Detection and Ranging) is a widely used data source to generate DEM.

Page 23: Soil separability through remote sensing for land evaluation

23

RS assisted soil parameters

Mineralogy

Soil texture

Soil moisture

Soil organic carbon

Iron content

Soil salinity

Soil degradation

Page 24: Soil separability through remote sensing for land evaluation

24

Remote sensing- digital soil products1. Mineralogy

In order to discriminate between different minerals, subtle differences in the spectral signature throughout the VNIR to TIR may be used.

(Clark et al., 2003 )

Page 25: Soil separability through remote sensing for land evaluation

25

1. Mineralogy

USGS spectral library - spib06 ASTER spectral library version 2.0

Page 26: Soil separability through remote sensing for land evaluation

26

1. Mineralogy

Examples of ASTER mineral library reflectance spectra of several classes demonstrating the variety in spectral shapes across both the visible to shortwave infra-red (2.0–15.4 µm) WL ranges

Page 27: Soil separability through remote sensing for land evaluation

2. Soil texture

Typical spectra curves for various soils and nonsoil classes (Venkataratnam, 1980)

Page 28: Soil separability through remote sensing for land evaluation

28

2. Soil texture

Nominal clay content (%) for distinct soil units of Wales, based on Aster data (Mayr and Palmer, 2006 )

Page 29: Soil separability through remote sensing for land evaluation

29

3. Soil Moisture

Characteristic peaks of water and hydroxyl bands

(Baumgardner et al., 1985)

Page 30: Soil separability through remote sensing for land evaluation

30

2. Soil moisture

Page 31: Soil separability through remote sensing for land evaluation

31

4. Soil organic matter

Effect of organic matter on spectralreflectance of soil

(Sinha, 1987).

Page 32: Soil separability through remote sensing for land evaluation

32

4. Soil organic matter

Generally, the greater the amount of organic content in a soil, the greater the absorption of incident energy and the lower the spectral reflectance.

Page 33: Soil separability through remote sensing for land evaluation

33

Remote sensing- digital soil products4. Soil organic matter

Map of SOC content in a freshly ploughed field using airborne imaging spectroscopy. Dashed lines denote boarders of the original, separated fields

DEM of the study area(Stevens et al., 2006)

Page 34: Soil separability through remote sensing for land evaluation

34

Range of organic carbon (%) for the topsoil. Namoi Valley, Australia.

4. Soil organic matter

(Minasny, 2006 )

Page 35: Soil separability through remote sensing for land evaluation

35

Harmonized World Soil Database (HWSD)

4. Soil organic matter

FAO soils portal -

Page 36: Soil separability through remote sensing for land evaluation

36

5. Iron content

Effect of iron oxide on spectral reflectance of soil

(Sinha, 1987)

Page 37: Soil separability through remote sensing for land evaluation

37

5. Iron content

Iron oxide in a sandy loam soil causes an increase in reflectance in the red portion of the spectrum (0.6 - 0.7 mm) and a decrease in in near-infrared (0.85 - 0.90 mm) reflectance

Page 38: Soil separability through remote sensing for land evaluation

38

5. Iron content

Map of free iron oxides at the Ashdod sand dunes, Israel.

(Ben-Dor et al., 2008 )

Page 39: Soil separability through remote sensing for land evaluation

39

Raw reflectance spectra of five soil salinity classes.

6. soil salinity

The spectral response patterns of saline soils are a function of the quantity and mineralogy of the salts they contain

(Mougenot et al., 1993).

Page 40: Soil separability through remote sensing for land evaluation

40

Case studyAim - Monitoring of salinity in the area using multi-temporal satellite images.Study area - South west PunjabImagery used – IRS 1C satellite, LISS III Results During ground verification salt accumulation was also found to be associated with salt grass and salt tolerant wild vegetation. The area mapped in the classes of moderate and severe salt affected soil was 1.72 % and 7.90% of the total area.

Map showing preliminary interpreted units on FCC with base details

6. soil salinity

(Koshik, 2010)

Page 41: Soil separability through remote sensing for land evaluation

41

7. Soil degradation

Sludge abundance map based on HyMap data from 1999 in Aznalcollar, Spain. The sludge affected area (black background) is super imposed on the HyMap false color image

(Kemper and Sommer, 2003 )

Page 42: Soil separability through remote sensing for land evaluation

42

RS-techs for soil attribute retrievalSoil attributes RADAR LIDAR Optical Relevant

spectraregionActive Passive MS HS

Minerology -- -- -- 3 4 VNIR-TIR

Soil texture -- 3 -- 3 3 SWIR-TIR

Iron content -- -- -- 1 3 VNIR

SOC -- -- -- 1 5 VIS-SWIR

Soil moisture 4 4 -- 3 2 MW

Salinity -- -- -- 2 3 VIS-FIR

Carbonates -- -- -- 2 2 VIS

Vegetation patterns -- -- -- 5 5 NIR

Land cover -- 2 -- 4 5 VIS-NIRNumbers (1–5) indicate the feasibility to determine attributes with RS. The feasibility represents the weighted average of scores based on studies reported, dataset quality, obtained result and applicability to field surveys. 1=low, 2=low-medium, 3=medium, 4=medium-high and 5=high [Mulder et al., 2011].

Page 43: Soil separability through remote sensing for land evaluation

43

Ongoing and future missions1. Global Soil Map ( A consortium)

Soil depth, water storage, texture, fertility and carbon at fine spatial resolution (~100 m).

Interpretation and functionality options for a range of global issues such as food production, climate change, and environmental.

Freely available, web-accessible

[Arrouays et al., 2014].

Page 44: Soil separability through remote sensing for land evaluation

44

2. TanDEM-x mission (public and private) -Two satellites in a closely controlled formation with typical distances between 250 and 500 m.

-This unique twin satellite constellation will allow the generation of the World DEM

Ongoing and future missions

Page 45: Soil separability through remote sensing for land evaluation

45

3. SMAP and EnMAP (NASA )-SMAP is designed to measure soil moisture in the top 5 cm (2

inches) of soil everywhere on Earth’s surface over a three-year period, every 2-3 days

-Weather and climate studies will use these data.

Ongoing and future missions

Page 46: Soil separability through remote sensing for land evaluation

46

4.Coppernicus programme (EC and ESA )-Provides geographical information on land cover/land use and on variables related to vegetation state and the water cycle.-The Copernicus programme comprises satellite-borne earth observation and in-situ data and a services component that combines these in order to provide information essential for monitoring the terrestrial environment..

Ongoing and future missions

Page 47: Soil separability through remote sensing for land evaluation

47

5. THEIA Land Data Centre (French initiative)-Designed to promote the use of satellite data for (1) environmental research on land surfaces, (2) public policy monitoring and (3) management of environmental resources.

North morombe, Madagascar. Imagery from Theia LDC

North morombe, Madagascar. Imagery from Google earth

Ongoing and future missions

Page 48: Soil separability through remote sensing for land evaluation

48

6.LP DAAC (NASA and USGS )-Land Process Data Distributed Active Archive Center- Land data Products and services from NASA-The LP DAAC is a component of NASA’s Earth Observing

System (EOS).

A large crack found through land data in Arizona

Ongoing and future missions

Page 49: Soil separability through remote sensing for land evaluation

49

Natural resources monitoring and management in India, using RS

NRSC is responsible for acquisition, processing, supply of aerial and satellite remote sensing data.

NRSC has images from Indian and foreign RS satellites in its archives and also has the capability to acquire data pertaining to any part of the globe on demand.

National Remote Sensing Agency, Hyderabad (ISRO)

Page 50: Soil separability through remote sensing for land evaluation

50

IRS -Applications

IMSD programme

Biodiversity Characterizations at

landscape level

Crop area estimation

Drought monitoring and assessment based on vegetation condition

Coastal studies

Mineral mapping

Environmental impact analysis

Forest survey

IRSLand use/cover mapping

Wetland mapping

Page 51: Soil separability through remote sensing for land evaluation

51

Natural resources monitoring and management in India, using RS

National Natural Resources Management System (NNRMS)• Nodal agency – Dept of Space (DOS)• Data from the IRS satellites is received and

disseminated by several countries all over the world.• The IRS system is the largest constellation of remote

sensing satellites in operation today in the world, with 11 operational satellites

Page 52: Soil separability through remote sensing for land evaluation

52

Serial No. Satellite Year of

Launch Status

1 IRS P6 (Resourcesat-1) 2003 In service2 IRS P5 (Cartosat -1) 2005 In service3 Cartosat -2 (IRS P7) 2007 In service4 Cartosat -2A 2008 In service5 IMS 1 2008 In service6 Oceansat -2 2009 In service7 Cartosat -2B 2010 In service8 Resourcesat -2 2011 In service9 Megha -Tropiques 2011 In service10 RISAT-1 2012 In service11 SARAL 2013 In service

Indian RS satellites

Page 53: Soil separability through remote sensing for land evaluation

53

Conclusions

Conventional mapping can greatly benefit from RS, especially nowadays where many different satellite images and aerial photographs are available with different spatial, spectral, and temporal resolutions.

Different unexplored fields of RS are under research and definitely promising tools for mapping soils in the near future.

RS tools are very useful for soil mapping in conventional and DSM.

RS and Pedometrics are directly linked in generating ancillary data layers for mapping soils. Thus, they have huge potential in soil mapping.

Page 54: Soil separability through remote sensing for land evaluation

54Thank you

Page 55: Soil separability through remote sensing for land evaluation

55