31
EXAMINING A PILOT PROGRAM FOR THE REMOTE OBSERVATION OF GRADUATE INTERNS Tina Heafner Teresa Petty Richard Hartshorne University of North Carolina at Charlotte, USA

Rogi Sloan C Final

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Rogi Sloan C Final

EXAMINING A PILOT PROGRAM FOR THE

REMOTE

OBSERVATION OF

GRADUATE

INTERNS

Tina Heafner

Teresa Petty

Richard Hartshorne

University of North Carolina at Charlotte, USA

Page 2: Rogi Sloan C Final

RATIONALE

Page 3: Rogi Sloan C Final

RATIONALE

Page 4: Rogi Sloan C Final
Page 5: Rogi Sloan C Final
Page 6: Rogi Sloan C Final
Page 7: Rogi Sloan C Final
Page 8: Rogi Sloan C Final
Page 9: Rogi Sloan C Final
Page 10: Rogi Sloan C Final
Page 11: Rogi Sloan C Final
Page 12: Rogi Sloan C Final
Page 13: Rogi Sloan C Final
Page 14: Rogi Sloan C Final
Page 15: Rogi Sloan C Final
Page 16: Rogi Sloan C Final
Page 17: Rogi Sloan C Final
Page 18: Rogi Sloan C Final
Page 19: Rogi Sloan C Final
Page 20: Rogi Sloan C Final
Page 21: Rogi Sloan C Final
Page 22: Rogi Sloan C Final
Page 23: Rogi Sloan C Final
Page 24: Rogi Sloan C Final

(-) Staged

(+) Personal

(+) Immediate feedback

(+) Multiple perspectives

Page 25: Rogi Sloan C Final

(+) Overcomes geographical boundaries

(+) More comfortable with remote observations

(+) Different feeling for both teacher & students

Page 26: Rogi Sloan C Final
Page 27: Rogi Sloan C Final

(-) Accessibility of Video

(-) Uploading Compressed Video

(-) Lack of Immediacy of Feedback

(-) Lack of User-Friendly Software

(-) Initially Frustrating/Learning Curve (Premier)

(-) Pedagogical Effectiveness/Value Added???

Page 28: Rogi Sloan C Final

DISCUSSIONTroubleshooting Technology Barriers

Initial Thinking—Asynchronous-Cost Effective-Easiest to Implement

Practicality Determines Utility-Is It Worth It? -Emergence of Synchronous Mode

Page 29: Rogi Sloan C Final