Re-imagining Educational Technology in English Language Classrooms

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Re-imagining Educational Technology in English Language Classrooms

44th Annual TESOL ConventionBoston, Massachusetts, USA

March 25, 2010 (2:00 2:50 PM) Boston Convention Center Room 206 A

Justin ShewellArizona State [email protected]

Overview

Rationale

Research Questions

Methods

Results

Suggestions

Rationale

Technology is an important tool in today's educational world

Teachers often do not use technology to its full potentialaccess to authentic content

promote higher-order thinking skills

student-centered learning

facilitates learning on many different levels

Rationale

Meskill & Mossop (1997)surveyed ESL teachers in New York

did follow-up interviews with 56 ESL teachers who said they use technology in teaching

divided teachers into two groups:those who felt technology was best used to supplement classroom teaching

those who felt technology was an integral part of the curriculum and used technology to stimulate students

Exploratory

Research Questions

AccessDo students have adequate access to technology in ESL/EFL settings?

IntegrationTo what extent is technology integrated into the curriculum?

What technologies are used in ESL/EFL teaching?

What skills or skill areas are being impacted by technology?

Research Questions (continued)

MotivationWhat are teachers' attitudes toward using technology in teaching?

Methods

Participants54 males, 115 females (Total: 169)

Ages ranged from 25 to 64 (approx.)45 54 (33%)

35 44 (25%)

55 64 (23%)

25 34 (15%)

Other (4%)

25 - 3435 - 4445 - 5455 - 64Other

Methods (continued)

ParticipantsTeaching ExperienceMore than 20 years (32.10%)

16 to 20 years (20.37%)

11 to 15 years (19.75%)

6 to 10 years (17.28%)

1 to 5 years (8.64%)

Less than 1 year (1.85%)

Teaching LoadMajority were full-time teachers (81.33%)

Majority teach Listening, Reading, Writing, Grammar, Speaking and Vocabulary (over 80%)

Other

1 to 5 years

6 to 10 years

11 to 15 years

16 to 20 years

20+ years

Methods (continued)

ParticipantsLocation

Access

Availability of Computers in Classrooms78% with more than 15 students per class

31% with no computers in classroom

10% with only 1 computer in the classroom

36% with 15 or more computers in classroom

Availability of Internet in Classroom26% with no Internet

8% with 1 connected computer

35% with 15 or more connected computers

13% not applicable

Access (continued)

Computer Labs44% reported no time in computer lab

34% reported 2 hours or less

3 main groupsalmost 1 to 1 (student to computer) 36%

almost no access (very high ratios) 36%

middle group (mixed access ratio) 28%

Integration

High Access GroupComputer Usage by Students20% reported 10 hours per week

29% reported 3 4 hours per week

23% reported 5 6 hours per week

mixed usage (low and high)

Internet Usage by Students25% reported 1 2 hours per week

26% reported 3 4 hours per week

15% reported 5 6 hours per week

10% reported 10 hours per week

Integration

Low Access GroupComputer Usage by Students45% reported 1 2 hours per week

19% reported 3 4 hours per week

17% reported less than 1 hour or none

Internet Usage by Students45% reported 1 2 hours per week

20% reported 3 4 hours per week

25% reported less than 1 hour or none

Integration (continued)

High Access GroupTechnologies Used Most (Daily or Weekly)Computers in general (91%)

Internet (84%)

Email (83%)

Search Engines (79%)

Word Processing (78%)

Online Courseware (65%)

Technologies Used ModeratelyDrill and Practice (49% daily/weekly, 30% never)

Blogs (31% weekly, 52% never)

MP3 (26% weekly, 47% never)

Integration (continued)

Low Access GroupTechnologies Used Most (Daily or Weekly)Computers in general (75%)

Internet (65%)

Email (58%)

Search Engines (52%)

Word Processing (51%)

Technologies Used ModeratelyOnline Courseware (45% daily/weekly, 48% never)

Drill and Practice (37% daily/weekly, 41% never)

MP3 (28% weekly, 50% never)

Integration (continued)

High Access GroupHow are computers used?Plan, draft, proofread, revise and publish written text (75%)

Organize and store information (75%)

Support individualized learning (69%)

Remediation of basic skills (64%)

Create visual displays of data or information (eg. charts, graphs, maps) (62%)

Communicate information as the result of investigations (57%)

Integration (continued)

Low Access GroupHow are computers used?Plan, draft, proofread, revise and publish written text (52%)

Organize and store information (48%)

Communicate information as the result of investigations (44%)

Create visual displays of data or information (eg. charts, graphs, maps) (41%)

Support individualized learning (41%)

Remediation of basic skills (34%)

Integration (continued)

How is the Internet Used?High Access GroupGather information (84%)

Authentic language input (77%)

Communicate with others (72%)

Low Access GroupGather information (69%)

Communicate with others (49%)

Authentic language input (49%)

Integration (continued)

NoneA littleSomeA lotN/ATotal

Grammar1.7%33.9%27.1%35.6%1.7%59

15.3%30.5%32.2%15.3%6.8%59

Listening1.7%10.3%25.9%58.6%3.4%58

14.8%8.2%34.4%37.7%4.9%61

Reading3.3%3.3%42.6%47.5%3.3%61

13.6%15.3%49.2%20.3%1.7%59

Writing3.3%9.8%37.7%47.5%1.6%61

15.5%17.2%36.2%29.3%1.7%58

Speaking24.1%20.7%34.5%17.2%3.4%58

27.9%21.3%24.6%23.0%3.3%61

Vocabulary3.3%11.7%33.3%50.0%1.7%60

9.8%14.8%41.0%31.1%3.3%61

Computer Usage by Skill Area

Integration (continued)

Obstacles62% said not enough computers

55% said old or malfunctioning computers

63% said slow Internet access

53% said not enough time

51% said not enough support to fix problems

49% said not enough support from administrators

Motivation

Teachers Attitudes toward Technology92% felt technology is an asset in accomplishing curricular objectives

82% felt Internet had a big impact on teaching

55% felt technology best at supplemental activities outside of class

55% felt technology should be totally integrated into curriculum

Professional Development

Time Spent in PD14% reported no PD related to technology

20% reported only 1 hour per month

14% reported 2 hours per month

12% reported more than 20 hours per month

PD Activities (top 3)80% had informal conversations with colleagues

63% attended institutional workshops

63% read journals or academic resources

Professional Development

Learning about technologyOther teachers (80%)

Exploring alone (76%)

Workshops (including conferences) (70%)

Suggestions

Low Access Grouprevolving access groups

allow students to use their own equipment in the classroomVail, Arizona

design technology based activities to be done outside of class (perhaps at home)

Limitations & Conclusions

Survey questions confusing?

More analysis of responsescomparing sub-groups to find correlations

ConclusionsEven in high access situations, technology is not utilized fully

Access is only one predictor of integration level

?