Upload
jeff-shaver-phd
View
60
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Running Head: PRINCIPAL CERTIFICATION PORTFOLIO – ANGELO STATE UNIVERSITY
Title: Principal Certification Portfolio
Jeff Shaver
Angelo State University
EDG 6345 Human Relationships in Educational Administration
EDG 6341 Role of the Principal
August – October, 2016
Portfolio: Principal Certification Portfolio – Angelo State University
Table of Contents
EDG 6345 - Human Relationships in Educational Administration:
• Module 1: Development of Your Personal Leadership Vision
• Module 2: Navigating a School’s “Hidden History” and Becoming an Insider
• Module 3: Defining School Leadership Skills
• Module 4: S.W.O.T. Analysis – Managing Human and Material Resources Effectively
• Module 5: Campus and Central Office Collaboration
• Module 6: Parents and the Greater Community
• Module 7: Working with the Media
EDG 6341 - Role of the Principal
• Module 1: Educational Leadership Competency Connections
• Module 2: Principal Interview – Communicating Your Vision
• Module 3: Relating Professional Learning Communities to Principal Competencies
• Module 4: Optimizing Learning in Mathematics
• Module 5: Collaboration – Demographics and Needs Assessment
• Module 6: Ethics and Rights Assessment – Promoting Cultural Competency of a School
• Module 7: Advocating for Programs and Policies
Running Head: PRINCIPAL CERTIFICATION PORTFOLIO – ANGELO STATE UNIVERSITY
EDG 6345 - Human Relationships in Educational Administration
Jeff Shaver
Angelo State University
August – October 2016
Running Head: DEVELOPMENT OF YOUR PERSONAL LEADERSHIP VISION
Module 1: Development of Your Personal Leadership Vision
Jeff Shaver
Angelo State University
EDG 6345 Human Relationships in Educational Administration
August 27, 2016
Module 1: Development of Your Personal Leadership Vision
2
Development of My Personal Leadership Vision
Background:
To help me to shape my own personal leadership vision, I found it helpful to research and
internalize the strategic plan and vision of a school district that I respect and know, Highline
Public Schools in Washington State. Their vision is their promise to their students, families and
the community that “every student in Highline Public Schools is known by name, strength, and
need, and graduates ready for college, career, and citizenship” (Strategic Plan, 2016).
Within their strategic plan, Highline Public Schools has established four pillars to
“support [their] instructional vision and guide [their] professional practices” (Strategic Plan,
2016), which are:
(1) equitable access to rigorous, standards-based instruction (e.g., personalized
learning),
(2) results-focused professional learning and collaboration (e.g., professional
pathways, communities of practice, leadership for results),
(3) strong partnerships with families and community, and
(4) a culturally responsive organization (e.g., culture of learning, service, and
equity).
As stated in their strategic plan, for each pillar they have “articulated professional
practices that guide what [they] must do well in every classroom, in every school, across [the]
entire district to ensure success for all students, without exception” (Strategic Plan, 2016).
I felt that it was necessary to utilize the shared vision of a district and its stakeholders,
because it seems as if a personal leadership vision by itself is potentially irrelevant or
disconnected from the needs of the community that the leader is serving. However, I do think
that it could be possible to create a personal leadership vision that is adaptable to various school
Module 1: Development of Your Personal Leadership Vision
3
community. But, in this case, I have utilized the community-developed strategic plan and vision
of Highline Public Schools to take my first steps at developing my personal leadership vision.
To support me in developing my personal leadership vision, I utilized the framework laid
out by Robbins and Alvy (2004, p. 1-13) and the five key responsibilities, proposed by The
Wallace Foundation (2013), of a principal, which include:
1. Shaping a vision of academic success for all students, one based on high standards.
2. Creating a climate hospitable to education in order that safety, a cooperative spirit
and other foundations of fruitful interaction prevail.
3. Cultivating leadership in others so that teachers and other adults assume their parts
in realizing the school vision.
4. Improving instruction to enable teachers to teach at their best and students to learn
to their utmost.
5. Managing people, data and processes to foster school improvement.
Both the framework and a focus on the responsibilities of a principal provided me the
foundation for establishing a shared vision for my school community that is centered upon
teaching, learning, and assessment (see Figure 1 and Appendix).
Framework for the Development of My Personal Leadership Vision:
Using the framework from Robbins and Alvy (2004, p. 1-13), in Figure 1, I identified my
beliefs (in blue) related to professional development, students, change, curriculum/instruction
/assessment, staff members, learning, leadership, communication, supervision, and community
building. And, I also organized my beliefs within the six domains of leadership responsibility
(Connelly and Bartoletti, 2013, p. 8), including: (1) Professional growth and learning, (2) Student
growth and achievement, (3) School planning and progress, (4) School culture, (5) Professional
qualities and instructional leadership, and (6) Stakeholder support and engagement.
Module 1: Development of Your Personal Leadership Vision
4
Figure 1. Connection of my beliefs, based on the template from Robbins and Alvy (2004, p. 1-13), to the six key domains of leadership responsibility (Connelly and Bartoletti, 2013, p. 8), and other resources (Spear, 2003; Strategic Plan, 2016; The Wallace Foundation, 2013). Note, my more detailed are available in the Appendix (p. 7-9) after the References.
My Personal Leadership Vision:
Utilizing my research on the importance of a principal’s vision that has brevity, clarity,
abstractness, challenge, future orientation, stability, and desirability (Kemp, Hardy, and Harris,
2014, p. 54) and my beliefs with respect to a principal’s responsibilities (Figure 1), my personal
leadership vision that supports the vision of Highline Public Schools (Strategic Plan, 2016), is:
We strive to nurture the academic achievement of all students by continuously
improving our instruction and ensuring equitable access to rigorous instruction
for all students, cultivating leaders throughout our school community, providing a
culturally-responsive and inclusive learning environment, and building strong
partnerships with all families and the community.
Module 1: Development of Your Personal Leadership Vision
5
Communicating My Personal Vision:
According to Sterret (2011), “Without action, a vision is just a piece of paper.” Sterret,
therefore, recommends making morning announcements, sending daily e-mail to staff, attending
community events, and conducting effective meetings to keep everyone focused on the vision.
In addition, Sterret emphasizes the importance of visibility, availability, and supporting others
with overcoming challenges. Johnson (2008) states, “A principal with a vision and expertise
creates a blueprint of how the school can achieve its goals. He or she finds teachers and staff to
help make the vision a reality. The principal continually coaches and mentors the staff so that
together they can accomplish the desired results” (p. 72). One way that Sterret suggests that a
leader can keep others on track and motivated to accomplish the desired results is to “recognize
what the organization is doing right and affirming “quick wins” that are already occurring.”
Therefore, I plan to communicate my personal vision by making the vision visible (e.g.,
publish on my principal webpage), communicating the vision often in the context of our day-to-
day work (e.g., daily announcements and meetings), highlighting the positive work that we are
doing to fulfill our vision (e.g., staff acknowledgements), and ensuring that our vision is a shared
vision with our school community and various stakeholders (e.g., be involved in community
events).
Module 1: Development of Your Personal Leadership Vision
6
References
Connelly, G., & Bartoletti, J. (2013). Leadership Matters: What the Research Says About the
Importance of Principal Leadership. Retrieved August 26, 2016, from
http://www.naesp.org/sites/default/files/ LeadershipMatters.pdf
Johnson, J. (2008). The Principal's Priority 1. Educational Leadership - The Positive Classroom,
66(1), 72-76. Retrieved August 27, 2016, from http://www.ascd.org/publications/
educational-leadership/sept08/vol66/num01/The-Principal's-Priority-1.aspx
Kemp, A., Hardy, S., & Harris, P. (2014). The Principal's Vision: Necessity or Non-issue?
Journal of Research in Education, 24(2), 51-62. Retrieved August 26, 2016, from
http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1098181.pdf
Robbins, P., & Alvy, H. (2004). New Principal's Fieldbook: Strategies for Success. Retrieved
August 26, 2016, from http://www.ascd.org/publications/books/103019/chapters/Vision-
as-the-Compass.aspx
Spear, L. (2003). A Principal's Vision. Retrieved August 27, 2016, from
http://education.jhu.edu/PD/newhorizons/Transforming Education/Articles/Vision/
Strategic Plan. (2016). Retrieved August 26, 2016, from http://www.highlineschools.org/
domain/1145
Sterrett, W. (2011). Turning Vision into Reality. Retrieved August 27, 2016, from http://
www.ascd.org/publications/books/112009/chapters/Turning-Vision-into-Reality.aspx
The Wallace Foundation. (2013). Five Key Responsibilities - The School Principal as Leader:
Guiding Schools to Better Teaching and Learning. Retrieved August 27, 2016, from
http://www.wallace foundation.org/knowledge-center/Pages/key-responsibilities-the-
school-principal-as-leader.aspx
Module 1: Development of Your Personal Leadership Vision
7
Appendix
1) What things/theories/values/beliefs do I deeply value?
• Equitable access to rigorous instruction for all students (Strategic Plan, 2016) that
emphasizes:
§ Procedural fluency
§ Conceptual understanding
§ Relevance and application to real-world problems, issues and scenarios
• Results-focused professional learning and collaboration (Strategic Plan, 2016),
including:
§ Professional pathways
§ Communities of practice
§ Leadership for results
• Strong partnerships with families and the community (Strategic Plan, 2016), including:
§ Higher education
§ Workforce
§ For-profit, non-profit, and community organizations
• Culturally-responsive and inclusive learning community (Strategic Plan, 2016),
including:
§ Culture of learning
§ Service
§ Equity
• Coherence of vision across the district, school, and community
Module 1: Development of Your Personal Leadership Vision
8
2) What are your beliefs:
• About leadership? In order to fulfill our vision…
§ Cultivating leadership in others so that teachers and other adults assume their
parts in realizing the school vision (The Wallace Foundation, 2013, p. 9)
• About students? In order to fulfill our vision…
§ Shaping a vision of academic success for all students, one based on high standards
(The Wallace Foundation, 2013, p. 7)
• About staff members? In order to fulfill our vision…
§ Managing people, data and processes to foster school improvement (The Wallace
Foundation, 2013, p. 14)
• About community building? In order to fulfill our vision…
§ Class meetings to work on community (Spears, 2003)
§ Creating a climate hospitable to education in order that safety, a cooperative spirit
and other foundations of fruitful interaction prevail (The Wallace Foundation,
2013, p. 8)
• About curriculum, instruction, and assessment? In order to fulfill our vision…
§ Grade level teams planning and working together (Spears, 2003)
§ Frequent assessments used to inform instruction and decision making (Spears,
2003)
§ Highly trained teachers working closely with instructional facilitators
(professional developers) in their classrooms to improve teaching and learning.
Module 1: Development of Your Personal Leadership Vision
9
• About learning? In order to fulfill our vision…
§ Every one is engaged in learning, students and staff (Spears, 2003)
§ Constructivist teaching (Spears, 2003)
§ Attention to common vocabulary (Spears, 2003)
§ Collaborative, cooperative and active-based learning episodes
§ An absolute focus on the essential academic learning requirements (Spears, 2003)
§ Writing across the curriculum (Spears, 2003)
§ Improving instruction to enable teachers to teach at their best and students to learn
to their utmost (The Wallace Foundation, 2013, p. 11)
• About professional development? In order to fulfill our vision…
§ A certificated model of student support and professional development (Spears,
2003)
• About supervision? In order to fulfill our vision…
§ Managing people, data and processes to foster school improvement (The Wallace
Foundation, 2013, p. 14)
• About communication?: In order to fulfill our vision…
§ Effective, efficient, and continuous communication and collaboration is required
among all within our school community
§ A clear vision, responsive support, and engagement
• About change?: In order to fulfill our vision…
§ Fulfill our shared vision of academic success for all students (Strategic Plan,
2016), by improving instruction (The Wallace Foundation, 2013, p. 11)
Running Head: NAVIGATING THE “HIDDEN HISTORY” AND BECOMING AN INSIDER
Module 2: Navigating a School’s “Hidden History” and Becoming an Insider
Jeff Shaver
Angelo State University
EDG 6345 Human Relationships in Educational Administration
September 4, 2016
Module 2: Navigating a School’s “Hidden History” and Becoming an Insider
2
Navigating a School’s “Hidden History” and Becoming an Insider
School Culture: Past and Present – Uncovering and Understanding “Hidden History”
According to Robbins and Alvy (2004), “A critical leadership competency is the ability
to understand, read, and shape school culture” (p. 14). And, Roland Barth (2002) states that
“probably the most important and most difficult job of an instructional leader is to change the
prevailing culture of the school” and every culture has a “hidden history” (Peterson, 1982).
With respect to the hidden history of a school’s culture, Robbins and Alvy (2004), states
that a new principal “quickly learns about sacred cows, land mines, and traditions as he or she
begins to interact with the network of organizational members” (p. 14). Robbins and Alvy
(2004), also states that “culture [a “school’s unique personality”] is created as organizational
members create meaning within the walls where they spend their lives. It affects how people
feel, think, and act. It influences how they interact, do their work, make decisions, solve
problems, cope with tragedies, and celebrate successes” (p. 16). Therefore, a new educational
leader must prioritize and respect the efforts needed to learn how and why a school functions in
the way that it does, and to understand and embrace the culture and values of their new school
community. During this process, it might be that some of these functions will need to be
changed, but not until the “hidden history” has been necessarily unveiled.
School Culture: Future – Changing School Culture with Knowledge and Tools
Peterson and Deal (2002) note that “the unwritten tablet of social expectations found in a
culture influences almost everything that happens,” and Robbins and Alvy (2004), emphasizes
that it is important for a new principal to “understand the culture before trying to shape it” (p. 17)
and to identify whether the culture is cohesive or fragmented.
Module 2: Navigating a School’s “Hidden History” and Becoming an Insider
3
Robbins and Alvy (2004) state that “At the heart of every culture is a set of values and
beliefs. In cohesive cultures, common values and beliefs are held by all organizational members.
In fragmented cultures, each subculture’s members may have their own set of beliefs and values”
(p. 17). And, “To begin to shape new values, new traditions must be blended with the old”
(Robbins and Alvy, 2004, p. 17-18), which involves patience and strategic planning.
To give focus for the strategic planning needed to shape school culture, Jon Saphier and
Matthew King (1985) identified 12 norms of school culture that need to be strong to create a
healthy school culture that is ripe for change:
1. Collegiality 2. Experimentation
3. High expectations 4. Trust and confidence
5. Tangible support 6. Reaching out to the knowledge base
7. Appreciation and recognition 8. Care, celebration, and humor
9. Involvement and decision making 10. Protection of what’s important
11. Traditions 12. Honest, open communication
According to Saphier and King (1985), “If these norms are strong, improvements in
instruction, for example, will be significant, continuous, and widespread…however, if these
norms are weak, improvements will be infrequent, random, and slow.” And, “three of the
norms—collegiality, experimentation, and reaching out to the knowledge base—have the
strongest correlation between changing the school environment and improving student
achievement” (Saphier, 1996). Also, according to Robbins and Alvy (2004, p. 23) a healthy
school culture promotes, among other things,
• collaboration over competition
• optimists over naysayers
• continuous improvement over the status quo
Module 2: Navigating a School’s “Hidden History” and Becoming an Insider
4
Finally, Bryk and Schneider (2003), after a 10-year study of Chicago school reform, have
concluded that schools with a high degree of ‘relational trust’ are more likely to make the kind of
changes that help raise student (Robbins and Alvy, 2004, p. 38). Therefore, a supported culture
of collegiality, experimentation, and reaching out to the knowledge base, among other norms,
can help to build ‘relational trust’ and improve the likelihood of an instructional leader in
institutionalizing student-centered educational changes that will promote the success of all
students.
Organizational Socialization: The Stages
According to Robbins and Alvy (2004), “The process of learning the organizational
ropes—the roles, values, expected behaviors, and social knowledge of an organization—is
referred to…as “organizational socialization” (Schein, 1974; Louis, 1980)” (p. 44), and involves
three stages or phase: anticipatory socialization, encounter state, and the insider stage” (p. 44).
During the anticipatory socialization phase, a new principal would develop “expectations
about the new role and organization they are going to enter” (Robbins and Alvy, 2004, p. 44).
The encounter state is “when newcomers begin the role and enter the organization” and the
insider state is “when a [new principal is] comfortable with [his or her] role and accepted in the
organization” (p. 44).
Robbins and Alvy (2004) state that “each new principal seeks to become an insider as
soon as possible” and that Duke et al (1984) found that “reaching the insider stage usually takes
a few months and, in some cases, up to a year” (p. 46). And that ultimately, it is important to
“remember that teachers, classified staff, and parents want their principals to succeed” (Robbins
and Alvy, 2004, p. 46).
Module 2: Navigating a School’s “Hidden History” and Becoming an Insider
5
According to Robbins and Alvy (2004, p. 46), the following are indicators that a new
principal has reached the insider stage. He or she:
• Understands the values, norms, and routines that make up a school’s culture
• Is accepted by students and the community
• Takes control of one’s schedule
• Knows the names of a good number of students
• Effectively handles daily routines or the big school events
• Has learned how the informal school network operates
• Successfully networks with colleagues at regional, state, or national conferences
• Has gotten to know the veteran principals who are the expert practitioners
Organizational Socialization: Becoming an Insider and Affecting Change
According to Robbins and Alvy (2004), “it is important for new principals to develop a
“strategic sense,” or a personal vision to direct their actions during the first year. At the same
time that a personal vision is being constructed, a newcomer needs to relate to the organizational
vision” (p. 54-55; Hall and Mani, 1992). Therefore, an instructional leader needs to
simultaneously and continuously shape his/her personal leadership vision based on his/her
growing understanding of the organizational culture and vision.
One of the challenges of developing a personal leadership vision is to have a broad
viewpoint of the organizational needs. Robbins and Alvy (2004) state that “the challenge is to
reconsider a viewpoint and attitude that worked when the boundary of responsibilities was
limited” (p. 55). What the authors are saying is that our experience as educators (e.g., science
teacher) cannot overly influence our leadership and result in a narrow perspective. An
educational leadership must develop a broad perspective that encompasses the needs of all of
his/her stakeholders.
Module 2: Navigating a School’s “Hidden History” and Becoming an Insider
6
In addition to creating a personal leadership vision based on a broad perspective, Robbins
and Alvy (2004) also emphasize the importance of “coping with the steep learning curve” as a
new educational leader. The authors state that “developing effective strategies to cope with the
situations that bring on this feeling [e.g., doubt] is the important next step” (p. 56). Therefore, it
is important for an educational leader to work towards aligning his/her personal leadership vision
based on a deep understanding of their school culture and organizational vision; however, he/she
must be patient and know that there is a lot to learn.
Robbins and Alvy (2004), continue by saying that “the challenge for new principals is to
take the time to absorb the culture and learn about the values, norms, and routines of the school
before making any significant culture-shaping decisions” and that part of understanding the
school culture is “effectively using the informal school and district network” (e.g., school
secretary). The authors state that “a visionary principal must examine the informal network and
implement changes if students and staff are not meeting important goals” (Robbins and Alvy,
2004, p. 56). Additionally, effective education leaders support their staff in utilizing: data-driven
decision making, action research, critical friends group, crisis management strategies - bullying
prevention and anti-terrorism, family support services, to support the school community, and to
develop and maintain a healthy school culture (Robbins and Alvy, 2004, p. 57).
Robbins and Alvy (2004) recognize that “often new principals accept the job because
they want to make more of a difference for individuals than they could in the classroom. Yet
school policy can lead to complex and troublesome decisions when the needs of an individual
student seem to contrast or conflict with the school policy.” The authors state the “ethical
dilemmas of “right vs. right” can make it very difficult for the principal who wants to help the
individual student and the whole school” (Robbins and Alvy, 2004, p. 58; Kidder & Born, 1998–
Module 2: Navigating a School’s “Hidden History” and Becoming an Insider
7
1999). Therefore, as discussed earlier, educational leaders must be patient and work through
doubts, but remain focused and determined to support both the individual needs of their students
and the school community as a whole. And, that educational leaders should embrace the fact that
new educational leaders “shape the organization as the organization is shaping them” (Robbins
and Alvy, 2004, p. 59; Hart, 1993).
Organizational Socialization: Building Relationships and Affecting Change
According to Robbins and Alvy (2004), “If the first year of the principalship is an
indicator of future success, then it is important for the newcomer to pursue a student-centered
vision right from the start. But if that vision does not include first trying to understand the school
culture, then a degree of organizational instability can occur, making it all but impossible for the
new principal to develop a trusting relationship with the faculty” (p. 59). Therefore, as the
authors also emphasize, it is difficult but also imperative that a new educational leader strikes “a
balance between maintaining stability and serving as a change agent” and that “leading a smooth
transition characterized by stability and meaningful change is indeed challenging” but necessary
and possible (Robbins and Alvy, 2004, p. 59).
As Robbins and Alvy (2004) clearly and accurately state, “Meaningful and quality human
relationships are a key to any successful organization. Until those relationships are established in
a school, day-to-day energy and long-range meaningful goals are difficult to pursue with
passion” (p. 59). And, “a new leader cannot fully communicate the message below on the first
day of school—but must start on the first day” (Robbins and Alvy, 2004, p. 60).
“I am a caring person, and I am here to make sure you are challenged
academically and engaged in meaningful work. I am here, also, to make sure
you behave appropriately, care for classmates and adults, and respect learning
and the school facility.”
Module 2: Navigating a School’s “Hidden History” and Becoming an Insider
8
Reflected in the message above, “new principals must make it clear from the outset that
they are firm and resolute with regard to violence, harassment, intimidation, bullying, and
bigotry” (Robbins and Alvy, 2004, p. 60). And, as mentioned previously, the school community
wants a new principal to be successful, but they also want their educational leader to be clear and
concise in their vision for collective success and defense of collective culture and values. In
support of collective culture, values and student success, “principals must convey that they honor
constructive two-way conversation to provide the best education possible for the student”
(Robbins and Alvy, 2004, p. 63).
Another example of how an educational leader can support a student-center approach is
encouraging “teachers and other administrators to make the appropriate arrangements, even
during the school day, to attend activities in which one’s own child appears” (Robbins and Alvy,
2004, p. 63). Efforts like this make it clear that a principal values all students, and leads through
words and action. Below are additional and more specific examples based on “important
leadership themes” of effective educational leadership, how to articulate a student-centered
vision, and how an educational leader can demonstrate that he/she is an “insider” and positioned
to affect change (Robbins and Alvy, 2004, p. 64).
Important leadership themes: • keeping students at the heart
of organizational actions, • being a learning leader, • building quality relationships, • dedicating oneself to
instructional leadership, and • orchestrating school–
community partnerships
Articulate a common vision based on: • agreed-upon learning goals; • high expectations for all students; • an emphasis on meaningful, quality, and engaging
student work; • successful relationships with parents; • monitoring of student success; • respect for instructional time; • leadership throughout the organization; • collaboration among faculty about teaching and
learning; and • a safe and orderly school environment
Module 2: Navigating a School’s “Hidden History” and Becoming an Insider
9
References
Barth, R. (2002). The culture builder. Educational Leadership, 59 (8), 6–11.
Bryk, A., & Schneider, B. (2003). Trust in school: A core resource for school reform.
Educational Leadership, 60 (6), 40–44.
Duke, D., Isaacson, N., Sagor, R., & Schmuck, R. (1984). Transition to leadership . Portland,
OR: Lewis and Clark College, Educational Administration Program.
Hall, G., & Mani, M. (1992). Entry strategies: Where do I begin? In F. Parkay & G. Hall (Eds.),
Becoming a principal (chap. 2). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
Hart, A. (1993). Principal succession . Albany: State University of New York Press.
Kidder, R., & Born, P. (1998–1999). Resolving ethical dilemmas in the classroom.
Educational Leadership , 56 (4), 38–41.
Louis, M. (1980). Surprise and sense making: What newcomers experience in entering
unfamiliar organizational settings. Administrative Science Quarterly , 25 , 226–251.
Peterson, K. (1982). Making sense of principals’ work. Australian Administrator, 3 (3), 1–4.
Peterson, K., & Deal, T. (2002). The shaping school culture fieldbook . San Francisco: Jossey-
Bass.
Robbins, P., & Alvy, H. (2004). New Principal's Fieldbook: Strategies for Success. Retrieved
August 26, 2016, from http://www.ascd.org/publications/books/103019/chapters/Vision-
as-the-Compass.aspx
Saphier, J., & King, M. (1985,). Good seeds grow in strong cultures. Educational Leadership, 42
(6), 67–74.
Saphier, J. (1996). The skillful teacher: Building your teaching skills. Acton, MA: Research for
Better Teaching.
Module 2: Navigating a School’s “Hidden History” and Becoming an Insider
10
Schein, E. (1974). Organizational socialization and the profession of management. In D. Kolb, I.
Rubin, & J. McIntyre (Eds.), Organizational psychology (pp. 1–26). Englewood Cliffs,
NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Running Head: DEFINING SCHOOL LEADERSHIP SKILLS: KEY SHIFTS
Module 3: Defining School Leadership Skills
Jeff Shaver
Angelo State University
EDG 6345 Human Relationships in Educational Administration
September 11, 2016
Module 3: Defining School Leadership Skills
2
Defining School Leadership Skills: Key Shifts
Introduction: "Instructional leadership is a moral responsibility, where leaders are unwaveringly
committed to student success and teacher growth” (Robbins and Alvy, 2004, p. 88). With
respect to teacher growth, Carol Dweck (TED, 2014) would likely agree that it is not only the
responsibility of an educational leader to ensure all teachers “create growth mindset classrooms,”
but that they also ensure their teachers have a growth mindset, with respect to their own
professional practice, rather than a fixed mindset. However, an educational leader must also
have a growth mindset, and know that “their job performance can help a marginal teacher
become skilled or an average teacher become exceptional” (p. 88) and know that he or she “can
affect student success by helping teachers be the best they can be” (Robbins and Alvy, 2004, p.
88). And, therefore, “if we want students to grow [and have a growth mindset] and develop their
skills, then we must want the same for teachers” (Robbins and Alvy, 2004, p. 89).
According to Robbins and Alvy (2004), “effective instructional leadership is a
longstanding component of the effective schools research” (Glickman, Gordon, & Ross-Gordon,
2001), and requires the examination of the “instructional, curriculum, and assessment shifts”
(Robbins & Alvy, 2003) that effective educational leaders need to understand, study, and
“support as instructional leaders” (p. 90). These key “instructional, curriculum, and assessment
shifts” (Robbins and Alvy, 2004; Appendix A) include:
Module 3: Defining School Leadership Skills
3
Table 1: Key Instructional, Curriculum, and Assessment Shifts (Robbins and Alvy, 2004)
1. Observing quality, meaningful, and engaging student work (p. 91-93).
Shift Type: I, C
2. Offering quality, meaningful, and engaging work for all students (p. 93-94).
Shift Type: I, C 3. Formative and summative teacher
supervision focusing on state standards (p. 94-97).
Shift Type: I, C, A
4. Refocusing the clinical supervision process (p. 97-102).
Shift Type: I, C, A 5. Data-driven assessment decisions
(p. 102-104).
Shift Type: A
6. State-level and alternative assessments (p. 104-105).
Shift Type: A 7. Best practices research (p. 105-108).
Shift Type: I, C
8. Differentiated supervision customized for novice, experienced, and at-risk teachers (p. 108).
Shift Type: A 9. Continuous teacher growth (p. 109).
Shift Type: I, C, A
10. Collaborative professional development practices led by teachers (p. 109-110).
Shift Type: L 11. Teacher reflection, self-reflection, and
goal setting (p. 110).
Shift Type: I, C, A
12. Building-level teacher leadership (p. 111).
Shift Type: L
As you can see from Table 1 above, each of the 12 shifts have been identified with a
“shift type” that can include one or more of the following: Shared Leadership (L), Instruction (I),
Curriculum (C), or Assessment (A). Even though shared leadership isn’t specifically called out
in Robbins and Alvy (2004), it is clear that two of the shifts (10 and 12): 10. Collaborative
professional development practices led by teachers, 12. Building-level teacher leadership; deal
specifically with educational leaders sharing school leadership roles with their teachers.
Module 3: Defining School Leadership Skills
4
Shift 1. Observing quality, meaningful, and engaging student work
With respect to observing student work, according to Robbins and Alvy (2004),
“Previously, supervisors concentrated primarily on the teacher delivery system” (p. 91). Now,
however, Robbins and Alvy (2004), state that “principals, other supervisors, and teachers
involved in peer observation and lesson study groups are observing the teacher delivery system
and students engaged in meaningful work” (p. 91). Based on my own experience, I would agree
that my supervisors observed and reflected with me on how I facilitated lessons, but also the
work that my students were doing and their understanding of the purpose and objective of their
work. And, according to Schlechty (2001), the following are a few of the qualities or attributes
that likely make schoolwork more engaging for student, and have often been reflected on with
my supervisors:
• Content, substance, and organization of knowledge
• Authentic work and tasks with clear product standards and objectives
• A climate that promotes risk-taking and supports “failure”
• Includes others and the community
• Provides a range of learning opportunities and student choice
Shift 2: Offering quality, meaningful, and engaging work for all students.
According to Robbins and Alvy (2004), the objective of this shift is “success for all as the
goal,” but is “more than a moral imperative; it is a component of the effective schools research—
all students can learn” (Glickman et al., 2001; Robbins and Alvy, 2004, p. 93), which is
reinforced by growth minds of students, teachers, and educational leaders. As a teacher and a
future educational leader, I believe that all students can learn and succeed, therefore, as Robbins
and Alvy (2004) state it, we “can facilitate this ideal by working collaboratively with others and
Module 3: Defining School Leadership Skills
5
using bold, educationally sound, and innovative strategies to firmly pursue a vision of success for
all students” (p. 94). However, fulfilling this shift will not be easy, and will require a lot of
productive perseverance.
Shift 3: Formative and summative teacher supervision focusing on state standards.
This shift, focuses on using state standards as a focal point for both formative and
summative teacher supervision, which can still be done using a clinical supervision process
model consisting of a: pre-observation conference, observation, reflection, and post-observation
conference (Robbins and Alvin, 2004; Cogan, 1973). And, during the pre-observation
conference the alignment of the lesson, to be observed, to course curriculum and state
standards/benchmarks can be addressed (Robbins and Alvin, 2004, p. 95).
In my teaching experience, at one school in particular, my advisor utilized a clinical
supervision process model, and we discussed how my lessons aligned to our science curriculum
but not state standards. However, I’m guessing that now, since Washington State is utilizing the
Next Generation Science Standards (NGSS), they are discussing the alignment of lessons to
NGSS during their pre-conferences.
Shift 4: Refocusing the clinical supervision process.
According to Robbins and Alvy (2004), “The process, formerly used primarily to observe
the teacher delivery system, is now used to engage teachers in a conversation about quality
student work, standards, data-driven decisions, and assessment strategies” (p. 97). As previously
mentioned, one of my former supervisors effectively utilized the clinical supervision process
with me, and we often examined student work as part of the reflection and post-observation
phase of the process. I plan to incorporate this process with my teachers as a principal.
Module 3: Defining School Leadership Skills
6
Shift 5: Data-driven assessment decisions.
With respect to data-driven assessment decisions that influence supervision and
evaluation, Robbins and Alvy (2004) state that "In general, a positive aspect of assessing is the
process of disaggregating data and searching for group or individual student trends or patterns to
help teachers pinpoint needs. In theory, if needs are pinpointed, teachers can modify their
practices to meet the needs of individual students or groups of students” (p. 102).
As a teacher, I have lead efforts to utilize data to pinpoint student needs, however, this is
very delicate work that requires patience, thoughtfulness, and collaboration. As an educational
leader, I will plan to work collaboratively with other administrators and teachers to develop and
implement a clear and thoughtful plan for analyzing our student data, and taking appropriate next
steps.
Shift 6: State-level and alternative assessments.
In short, this shift focuses on state-level assessments (usually criterion-referenced, in
contrast to norm-referenced) and alternative assessments, such as: portfolios, performances, and
exhibitions (e.g., senior projects) that “are increasingly valued by educators and the general
public” (Robbins and Alvy, 2004, p. 104-105). At one of my previous schools, students were
required to maintain an online academic portfolio, which fulfilled their requirement of a senior
project and was required to graduate. In addition, students were also required to pass district-
level end of course exams (EOCs) and state-level assessments to qualify for graduation.
Therefore, as you might imagine, not all students and families (or teachers) were a fan of both
state- and district-level assessments, in addition to alternative assessment requirements.
Module 3: Defining School Leadership Skills
7
Shift 7: Best practices research.
According to Marzano (2003), “Thirty-five years of research provides remarkably clear
guidance as to the steps schools can take to be highly effective in enhancing student
achievement” and, in fact, Marzano, Pickering, and Pollock’s (2001) have identified nine “best
practice” instructional strategies that promise to “significantly affect student achievement”
(Robbins and Alvy, 2004, p. 106). These strategies include: (1) comparing and contrasting, (2)
summarizing and notetaking, (3) giving praise, (4) homework and practice, (5) multiple,
nonlinguistic representations, (6) cooperative learning, (7) setting clear objectives and providing
meaningful feedback, (8) generating and testing hypotheses, and (9) advanced organizers
(Marzano, Pickering, and Pollock’s, 2001).
As a new principal, I will do as Robbins and Alvy (2004) suggest, and “share this
information with the faculty in a supportive manner to demonstrate a commitment to important
research with practical application” (p. 106). Of the strategies listed above, as a teacher I have
really focused on comparing and contrasting, notetaking, homework and practice, cooperative
learning, setting clear objectives and providing meaningful feedback, and generating and testing
hypothesis, but I could still work on providing appropriate and needed praise, using advanced
organizers, and have students use a variety of nonlinguistic representations. As an educational
leader, I won’t evaluate my teachers by going doing this list as a checklist for good teaching, but
rather will help my teachers identify gaps and areas for improvement.
Shift 8: Differentiated supervision customized for novice, experienced, and at-risk teachers.
In my teaching, I have benefits from mentor teachers and peer-coaching at both of my
former school districts. As Robbins and Alvy (2004), my former school districts used “the
strengths of their best teachers to help new or veteran teachers” (p. 108). At the very first district
Module 3: Defining School Leadership Skills
8
that I taught, I had three mentors: a peer mentor, who helped me hone my growth mindset for
teaching and establish effective classroom management; a science coach, who helped to ensure
that my pedagogical knowledge and practices were in-tune with my colleagues, that I had access
to and was utilizing our curricular materials and science equipment, and supporting me by co-
teaching with me from time-to-time and observing my teaching; and my assistant principal, who
utilized a clinical supervision process (as discussed above) throughout the school year to help me
to improve incrementally, little-by-little.
Shift 9: Continuous teacher growth.
As discussed previously, having a growth mindset (in mind and action) as an educational
leader is essential for promoting a growth mindset in teachers and students (Ted, 2014). As
Robbins and Alvy (2004) put it, continuous teacher growth “in contrast to mastery, is a more
suitable approach for addressing the complexities of teaching, learning, and assessment” (p.
109). There is a lot to know and do in teaching, and it’s hard to keep up with necessary
improvements in instruction, curriculum, assessment, and classroom management. Therefore, it
is really important, as an educational leader, to provide teachers with constructive feedback and
reflection on their practice so that they can focus on areas where improvement is needed. And,
it’s imperative that, as an educational leader, I’m transparent with my staff as to the areas where
I will be focusing on my own improvement.
Shift 10: Collaborative professional development practices led by teachers.
With respect to collaborative teacher-led professional development, Robbins and Alvy
(2004) state that “teachers are initiating and directing practices such as peer-coaching teams,
mentoring, critical friends and lesson study groups, teacher curricular and instructional
Module 3: Defining School Leadership Skills
9
breakfasts, and action research projects” and that research, according to Newmann & Wehlage
(1995), indicates “supporting a shift toward a collaborative model firmly indicates that when the
faculty functions as an effective learning community, student success is enhanced” (Robbins and
Alvy, 2004, p. 110).
As both a teacher presenter and a teacher that participated in teacher-led professional
development, I found it very useful to teach and learn from my peers. For example, I have
worked with teachers in Kenya to develop water quality curriculum for their students, and to
guide student independent research projects. In terms of the list presented in the paragraph
above, I have: participated in peer-coaching, had a teacher mentor, participated in lesson studies
and an action research project. My action research project was focused on researching,
developing, and implementing more effective was to engage with my students in order to
increase student engagement, motivation, and academic performance. In all honesty, it’s
difficult to try and do everything, but I have benefited greatly by learning with my colleagues.
Shift: 11: Teacher reflection, self-reflection, and goal setting.
With the support of a supervisor, teachers can maintain a reflective journal or portfolio,
which Robbins and Alvy (2004) say “can be an effective vehicle for reflecting on [a teacher’s]
professional practice” (p. 110). A few of the things that may constitute a professional teacher
portfolio include: a multi-week lesson plan, instructional plan for a single lesson, sample
assessments, videotape of a class, sample student work, lesson reflections, family contact log,
participation in school or district-related projects, professional development log, professional
contributions, a list of possible action research activities, pictures of meaningful school events, or
notes from students and families (Danielson, 1996; Robbins and Alvy, 2004).
Module 3: Defining School Leadership Skills
10
As a teacher, I maintained a professional teaching portfolio of my own, however, it was a
bit more of a scrapbook rather than something that I formally did with my supervisors support.
But, I can see this being a really enjoyable and productive thing to do with teachers and to
encourage teachers to do with their colleagues.
Shift 12: Building-level teacher leadership.
According to Robbins and Alvy (2004), focusing on building-level teacher leadership
involves expanding instructional, curricular, and assessment decisions to teacher leaders or site-
based management (SBM) teams” (p. 111). And, Robbins and Alvy (2004) state that “SBM
teams are often responsible for developing and implementing a school improvement plan (SIP)”
that are “designed to improve how a school functions and operates, with the intent of increasing
and enhancing teaching and learning; often required by state departments of education and local
school districts” (Morrison, 2003; Robbins and Alvy, 2004).
In my experience, at both of the schools where I taught, we had an SBM and SIP. At one
of the schools I was on the SBM team, and at the other school I wasn’t. The focus of the SBM
team that I was a member of was to support our schoolwide project-based learning (PBL)
implementation in all grades and across all subjects. I found it very useful and empowering to
work alongside my colleagues, school leaders, and community members to improve our
students’ success and learning experience.
Conclusion:
According to Robbins and Alvy (2004), “New principals must support these shifts to
succeed as 21st century instructional leaders” (p. 90-91). This chapter has helped me explore
how I, as a future educational leader, can promote student success by examining these
Module 3: Defining School Leadership Skills
11
important instructional, curriculum, and assessment trends with my teachers.
As an educational leader, I will ensure that staff professional development is
appropriately targeted to support our shared school and district goals and vision by empowering
my teachers to be educational leaders with me and working with them to design and implement
curricula that promotes effective instruction and student learning; align our curriculum and
instruction with assessments; and develop varied formative and summative assessments that
more accurately assess student performance.
Module 3: Defining School Leadership Skills
12
References
Cogan, M. (1973). Clinical supervision. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
Glickman, C., Gordon, S., & Ross-Gordon, J. (2001). Supervision and instructional leadership
(5th ed.). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
Marzano, R. (2003). What works in schools . Alexandria, VA: ASCD.
Marzano, R., Pickering, D., & Pollock, J. (2001). Classroom instruction that works. Alexandria,
VA: ASCD.
Morrison, G. (2003). Teaching in America (3rd ed.). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
Newmann, F., & Wehlage, G. (1995). Successful school restructuring. Madison, WI: University
of Wisconsin.
Robbins, P., & Alvy, H. (2003). The principal’s companion (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA:
Corwin Press.
Robbins, P., & Alvy, H. B. (2004). The new principal's fieldbook: Strategies for success.
Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Schlechty, P. (2001). Shaking up the schoolhouse: How to support and sustain educational
innovation. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
[TED]. (2014, November). Carol Dweck: The power of believing that you can improve. [Video
File]. Retrieved September 11, 2016, from https://www.ted.com/talks/carol_dweck_the_
power_of_believing_that_you_can_improve?language=en
Module 3: Defining School Leadership Skills
13
Appendix A.
Shifts (Robbins & Avery, 2004)
Type of Shift Shared
Leadership (L)
Instructional (I)
Curriculum (C)
Assessment (A)
1. Observing quality, meaningful, and engaging student work (p. 91-93).
✔ ✔
2. Offering quality, meaningful, and engaging work for all students (p. 93-94).
✔ ✔
3. Formative and summative teacher supervision focusing on state standards (p. 94-97).
✔ ✔ ✔
4. Refocusing the clinical supervision process (97-102).
✔ ✔ ✔
5. Data-driven assessment decisions (p. 102-104).
✔
6. State-level and alternative assessments (p. 104-105).
✔
7. Best practices research (p. 105-108).
✔ ✔
8. Differentiated supervision customized for novice, experienced, and at-risk teachers (p. 108).
✔
9. Continuous teacher growth (p. 109).
✔ ✔ ✔
10. Collaborative professional development practices led by teachers (p. 109-110).
✔
11. Teacher reflection, self-reflection, and goal setting (p. 110).
✔ ✔ ✔
12. Building-level teacher leadership (p. 111).
✔
Running Head: MANAGING HUMAN AND MATERIAL RESOURCES EFFECTIVELY
Module 4: S.W.O.T. Analysis – Managing Human and Material Resources Effectively
Jeff Shaver
Angelo State University
EDG 6345 Human Relationships in Educational Administration
September 13, 2016
Module 4: Managing Human and Material Resources Effectively
2
S.W.O.T. Analysis – Managing Human and Material Resources Effectively
According to Morrison (2009), “A SWOT Analysis for schools is a tool that can provide
prompts to…staff involved in the analysis of what is effective and less effective in [a] schools
systems and procedures.” In the SWOT Analysis template below (see Figure 1), the factors
(e.g., people, resources) for evaluating the internal strengths and weaknesses of the school have
been added, and elements within the PRIMO-F Model (Morrison, 2009). Additionally, in the
SWOT Analysis template, the factors (e.g., political, economic) for evaluating the external
opportunities and threats for a school are included, and elements within a PESTLE analysis
(Morrison, 2009).
Figure 1. A modified SWOT Analysis template that includes internal and external factors from the Primo-‐F Model and PESTLE analysis, respectively (Morrison, 2009).
Module 4: Managing Human and Material Resources Effectively
3
In The Principal’s Fieldbook (Robbins and Alvy, 2004, p. 144-182), the authors present
the key areas of focus (e.g., Protecting Quality Classroom Time; see Table 1, Areas of Focus)
for a principal to ensure that the human and material resources of the school are managed to
promote a thriving school and ultimately success for all students.
Table 1. A pre-SWOT analysis template for identifying and analyzing areas of focus.
Areas of Focus Internal Factor
Strength or Weakness?
External Factor
Opportunity or Threat?
Protecting Quality Classroom Time (p. 145-146) Operations Instructional Leadership (p. 146-148) Operations Management (p. 148-149) Operations Students (p. 149-150) People Personnel (p. 150) People Parents (p. 150-151) People Broader Community Stakeholders (p. 151) Social Principal Time Management (p. 151-157) Operations Desegregation (p. 161) Operations Legal Gender Equity (p. 162) Operations Legal
Serving Students with Disabilities (p. 162-163) Operations People Legal
Serving Students with Limited English Proficiency (p. 163- 164)
Operations People Legal
Safety, Negligence, and Child Abuse Issues (p. 164-165) Operations Legal
Free Speech and Censorship (p. 165) Operations Legal Student Discipline: Due Process and Search and Seizure Laws (p. 166-167) Operations Legal
Intimidation, harassment, and bullying (p. 167-168) Operations Legal Legal Issues After September 11th (e.g., cell phones policies, prayer, terrorism, tolerance) Operations Legal
Working with Unions (p. 169-172) People Operations
The School Budget (p. 172-175) Finance Political Maintaining a Facility that Accentuates Pride (175-176)
People Operations Social
Air Quality in School (p. 176-177) Operations Environ-ment
Table 1 can serve as a template to list all areas of focus to be analyzes for a school’s
management strengths or weaknesses (internal factors) and opportunities or threats (external
factors). However, with respect to our current list of focus areas, a school may determine, based
Module 4: Managing Human and Material Resources Effectively
4
on their own analysis, that they are not adequately serving students with disabilities. Therefore,
they would identify the focus area of “Serving Students with Disabilities” as an internal
weakness. Additionally, not serving students with disabilities could likely be an external threat,
because it poses a potentially major legal issue. Note, in addition to the areas of focus identified
in Robbins and Alvy (2004), you can fill-in the template with additional areas of focus. Once the
pre-SWOT analysis template (Table 1) has been completed, then the areas of focus can be
placed in the SWOT analysis template (Figure 1), see example below, for further analysis.
Module 4: Managing Human and Material Resources Effectively
5
References
Morrison, M. (2009). PESTLE Analysis for Schools or Education. Retrieved September 13,
2016, from https://rapidbi.com/pestle-analysis-for-schools-and-education/
Robbins, P., & Alvy, H. B. (2004). The new principal's fieldbook: Strategies for success.
Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Running Head: CAMPUS AND CENTRAL OFFICE COLLABORATION
Module 5: Campus and Central Office Collaboration
Jeff Shaver
Angelo State University
EDG 6345 Human Relationships in Educational Administration
September 21, 2016
Module 5: Campus and Central Office Collaboration
2
Campus and Central Office Collaboration
According the Robbins and Alvy (2004), there are several reasons that principals might
not take advantage of central office personnel and material resources, which include:
• Thinking that it’s a sign of weakness to ask for help
• Perceiving the central office as an overwhelming bureaucracy
• Competition between the central office and school
• Trying to succeed without the help of central office (p. 229-230)
With respect to principals trying to succeed on their own, Schlechty (2001) advises
principals to “learn to see yourself as a member of the district-level team as well as the head of
your own team at the building level” and to “recognize that your school is…part of a larger
system.” Additionally, Schlechty (2001) states that “other schools and other principals are not –
or should not be – your competition” and “principals will be more effective when they learn to
use the district and the community, just as district level officials will be more effective once they
learn to be more responsive to the needs of principals.”
With the support of the superintendent, Deal and Peterson (1994) suggest that “principals
should realize that the central office folks could get them out of a lot of jams” and help with
“curriculum, personnel and budgetary issues.” And, Grove (2002) states, “Vitally important,
central office staff members provide the support and consistency necessary for a high-quality
instructional program” and that: (1) “all staff want to be part of the school success story” and (2)
“central office wants to assist and celebrate student success.”
Therefore, a superintendent should take steps to ensure that the principals see the value in
working with central office personnel, and that central office personnel are providing the
necessary supports and services to principals that ensure high-quality instructional programs, a
Module 5: Campus and Central Office Collaboration
3
positive and productive district culture, and most importantly success for all students (see Figure
1). For example, as Robbins and Alvy (2004) state, principals should be supported in identifying
“which central office contacts are critical” and a superintendent should put in place “a formal
mentoring program” for new principals. Additionally, a superintendent can encourage
“professional development activities [e.g., book club] in which the central office personnel
interact with the principals and vice principals” in order to “create a bond among school leaders”
(Robbins and Alvy, 2004, p. 232).
Figure 1. A variety of central office services that promote high-‐quality instructional programs, a positive and productive district culture, and student success. Based on information presented in Robbins and Alvy (2004, p. 231) and Grove (2002).
As mentioned previously, central office staff want to celebrate in student successes
(Grove, 2002), but do not often have the opportunity to do so. Therefore, according to Robbins
and Alvy (2004), a superintendent can encourage principals to:
• Invite central office personnel to the schools for assemblies and special programs or
to visit classes
Module 5: Campus and Central Office Collaboration
4
• Keep central office personnel informed about activities with a formal calendar of
events
• Stop by the central office on occasion to interact with central office colleagues
• Have the central office display student work from the schools, which could be
facilitated by assigning different parts of the central office to specific schools
• Participate in a central office mentoring program or take a systematic tour of the
central office facility that includes a detailed review of individual central office
personnel responsibilities
• Keep central office administrators informed about any potential problems (p. 233-
234)
Though I do not currently work in a school district, I can speak to an experience of
effective and ineffective interactions between central office personnel and school leaders around
the implementation of a new program. As a Career and Technical Education (CTE) science
teacher in a very large school district in Washington State, my CTE Director and staff specialist
supported me through some of the recommendations presented earlier, including their: (1)
development and review of our biomedical sciences program of study, (2) observations of me as
a teacher and community engager, (3) support of me attending conferences and participating in
teacher professional development, (4) assistance in analyzing student achievement data from our
program, (5) management of grants to fund our biomedical science program, and completion of
necessary reports, (6) organizing of community activities and program committee meetings
associated with our biomedical science program, and (7) support of biomedical sciences program
informational sessions for students and parents. Additionally, I ensured that my central office
CTE colleagues celebrated in the success of our students by visiting the central office often with
students, inviting our students to present at school board meetings in support of their CTE
programs, and keeping the central office up-to-date on school activities and community events.
Module 5: Campus and Central Office Collaboration
5
However, not everything went smoothly with the implementation of our biomedical
science program. From the beginning there was definitely tension and a sense of competition
between my school leaders and the central office CTE staff. Additionally, there was ineffective
communication and collaboration around the budgeting and ordering of essential equipment for
our biomedical science program. For example, in our first year of implementation I did not have
any of the necessary biomedical sciences equipment until mid-year, and I was required to work
with a community organization to acquire loaned equipment for my hands-on biomedical
sciences labs. Also, none of my biomedical sciences classes were to have more than 25 students
enrolled; however, due to scheduling conflicts and other unforeseen challenges, I had two classes
of nearly 50 students. All in all, the superintendent was aware of all the positives and challenges
that we were facing in the implementation of our new biomedical sciences program, but seemed
hesitant to intervene due to personnel conflicts and potentially other factors.
In my opinion, it would have been helpful if our superintendent had intervened and
worked to help create a more collaborative and non-competitive culture around our CTE
biomedical sciences program. Additionally, it would have been productive to have us all
celebrate together in our students’ successes within our program, but often these celebrations
were fragmented and not inclusive of all stakeholders. In hindsight, there might have been more
that I could have done as the teacher to facilitate a more positive relationship between my school
leaders and CTE colleagues; however, I have often found it very difficult for teachers to be the
buffers. As a school- or district-level administrator I will try and be attentive to similar
situations that I have just described, and work to ensure that central office and school personnel
are continually improving in their abilities to collaborate and deliver high-quality instructional
programs that promote student success, within a positive and productive district culture.
Module 5: Campus and Central Office Collaboration
6
References
Deal, T., & Peterson, K. (1994). The leadership paradox. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Grove, K. (2002, May). The invisible role of the central office. Educational Leadership, 59 (8),
45–47.
Robbins, P., & Alvy, H. B. (2004). The new principal's fieldbook: Strategies for success.
Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Schlechty, P. (2001). Shaking up the schoolhouse: How to support and sustain educational
innovation. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Running Head: PARENTS AND THE GREATER COMMUNITY
Module 6: Parents and the Greater Community
Jeff Shaver
Angelo State University
EDG 6345 Human Relationships in Educational Administration
September 30, 2016
Module 6: Parents and the Greater Community
2
Parents and the Greater Community
Considering All Stakeholders - Interacting with Community-Based Organizations
According to Robbins and Alvy (2004), “Community-based organizations (CBOs)
include community organizations and clubs; professional associations; and local, state, and
federal agencies,” and “these organizations, devoted to social service assistance, can help
shoulder the social work role” of a school (see Table 1). In Table 1, the most frequently used
school-linked services are correlated with some specific community-based support efforts
(Morrison, 2003; Robbins and Alvy, 2004).
School-linked Services Community-based Support Efforts
1. Education (including Job
training and Community
engagement)
• 4-H Youth Development, and Boy and Girl Scouts
• Community Colleges and Teachers’ union
• Zoos, libraries, museums and art organizations
• Newspapers, television networks, and radio stations
• Youth sports organizations
2. Health and Emergency • Fire, police, and emergency service personnel
• Hospitals and health clinics, including dental care
3. Child Welfare and Family
welfare (including
Housing, Substance
abuse, Psychological,
Teen pregnancy, and
Juvenile probation
services)
• Alcoholics Anonymous
• Child care
• Clothing and Food banks
• Disability resource centers
• Habitat for Humanity
• Neighborhood and Religious organizations
• Salvation Army Family Emergency Centers
• Sexual assault crisis lines
• Temporary shelters
• YWCA therapeutic child development programs
Module 6: Parents and the Greater Community
3
As Robbins and Alvy (2004) explain, “Many of the CBOs, businesses, and industrial
organizations partner with school-career education programs often referred to as school-to-work
(STW) programs” that “link classrooms with authentic work environments.” In my experience,
the schools that I taught at did a great job of working with social services and community-
focused organizations, but could have done a better job of working with job training, workforce,
and industry-focused organizations. Also, I do not recall either of the schools I taught at making
any specific effort to celebrate the role of fire, police, medical, and other emergency service
personnel in your community. However, in Seattle, where I taught a biomedical sciences course,
the students did explore various professions throughout the course that related to specific topics
the students were studying. And, therefore, in some cases students interviewed local
professionals or invited them to speak to our class or school.
With respect to workforce and industry-focused training for students, in Seattle our
school worked very closely with the YWCA to provide in-class and after-school support and
training for our students, however, our school struggled to establish a working relationship with
the Fred Hutch Cancer Research Center, which was offering an 8-week summer intensive, paid
opportunity for 16 of our high-achieving, high poverty students in authentic science research
projects. Ultimately, our failure was in reaching an agreement on which students should qualify
for the program. Therefore, our school lacked a shared vision with the Fred Hutch, and
ultimately with other organizations interested in providing our students with intensive, rigorous,
and authentic STEM experiences and training. Of course, this was very frustrating and
disappointing to me. However, I’m hoping to learn from my teaching experiences, and apply my
experiences and continuous learning to be the most effective educational leader possible.
Module 6: Parents and the Greater Community
4
For example, some of the activities for “bringing families and the business community to
school” proposed by Robbins and Alvy (2004) that are of particular interest to me as a future
school leader, are:
• Holding Open House for families, businesses, fire, police and emergency workers,
CBOs, and the media to celebrate in community, school, and student successes.
• Inviting community businesses, senior citizens, and parents to math, science, and
technology exhibitions.
• Reaching out to the community to create career and expertise database resources for
career days, class presentations and projects, and STW programs.
• Conducting “Saturday Morning Parent Institutes” (e.g., how to support student
learning at home; college admissions process; personalized learning; exploring
educational and career pathways; and math, science, reading and writing support).
• Inviting the community to view a display of projects made by students during
service, STW activities, or in-school project-based learning (PBL) projects.
With respect to working with CBOs, it is important for school leaders to facilitate,
manage, and at times lead meaningful collaborations and partnerships with CBOs. Therefore, it
might be best for a school community to have a CBO task force (i.e., committee) or site-based
management (SBM) team that include school staff and other stakeholders within the community.
And, the responsibility of this task force or SBM team is to ensure that all CBO collaborations
and partnerships support the shared vision of the school community. Note, Epstein (2002) warns
that new school leaders “need to view their role on these committees as that of facilitators,
welcoming parents and other stakeholders into the picture to help with programs, policy,
budgetary, and instructional decisions.”
Module 6: Parents and the Greater Community
5
Ultimately, working with CBOs should involve: connecting mutual goals for student
success, integrate school and community resources to accomplish these goals, and facilitate
parent involvement. Because, as Wherry (2010) reports, research finds that “the best predictors
of student achievement” include:
• “Parents high expectations for achievement and future careers” (e.g., their child’s
involvement with CBOs), and
• “Parents being involved in a child’s education.
Also, according to Epstein (2002), successful parent involvement can be done in six
different ways, including shared support in: (1) Parenting, (2) Communication, (3) Volunteering,
(4) Learning at Home, (5) Decision Making, and (6) Collaborating with the Community.
Successful Parent Involvement
At both of the schools where I taught in the greater Seattle area, we engaged with parents
and families during: (1) open houses, (2) parent-teacher conferences, and (3) parent days (i.e.,
there were various days throughout the year when parents could join their son or daughter at
school to observe their classes or to meet with administrators and teachers), where high
expectations for student achievement, and future educational and career pursuits were shared.
Additionally, I engaged with parents and family during sporting events and other extracurricular
activities, science fairs, and project planning meetings.
For example, at one of my former schools, each year I supported 25-30 students in STEM
projects for a regional biosciences-focused regional competition, called Student BioExpo. These
projects required students to work with professional mentors (e.g., research scientists, medical
professionals) to support them in their research and project development. Therefore, each year I
invited all the students, mentors, and families to evening sessions that introduced everyone to the
Module 6: Parents and the Greater Community
6
purpose of the projects, project requirements, and allowed parents to meet and engage with the
professional mentors who would be working with their son or daughter. And, in some cases, the
parents had expertise that could contribute to their child’s project or other students’ projects.
Therefore, I made the point of including parents in the education of their child both inside and
outside the classroom.
In my experience, I have also successfully engaged with parents by phone (rarely email).
But, by far, the most meaningful parent engagement is in-person, however, it is not always
possible to meet with every parent in-person at the school. Therefore, in the future, I will try and
do a better job as an educational leader to go out into the community to meet and engage with
parents and families. However, on several occasions, I invited students (with their parents in
attendance) to speak on behalf of our school programs (e.g., CTE biomedical sciences program)
at school board meetings. Though speaking in front of the school board was nervous for both my
students and I, I think that it was a great experience for us all.
Steps to Legal Compliance – School Board Meetings (Open Meetings Act of Texas)
With respect to school board meetings, according to the Open Meetings Handbook
(Abbott, 2014, p. 24-38), the school board shall “give written notice of the date, hour, place, and
subject of each meeting” (p. 24). See the following four ‘steps’ for a school board to be in
compliance, with respect to school board meetings:
(1) Notice: The notice of a school board meeting “must be posted in a place readily
accessible to the general public at all times for at least 72 hours before the scheduled time of the
meeting” (p. 27-28), and a “school district shall post notice of each meeting on a bulletin board
at a place convenient to the public in the central administrative office of the district” (p. 30).
Additionally, with respect to special notice to the news media (p. 30-31):
Module 6: Parents and the Greater Community
7
“(a) A school district shall provide special notice of each meeting to any news media
that has: (1) requested special notice; and (2) agreed to reimburse the district for
the cost of providing the special notice.
(b) Notice shall be by telephone, facsimile transmission, or electronic mail.”
(2) Convening: A school board meeting “may not be convened unless a quorum…is
present in the meeting room.” And, the meeting must be “held in a location accessible to the
public” and be “physically accessible to individuals with disabilities” (p. 36).
(3) Open Meeting: A school board meeting that is “open to the public” is “one that the
public is permitted to attend,” however, this “does not entitle the public to choose the items to be
discussed or to speak about items on the agenda” (p. 36). But, the school board may “give
members of the public an opportunity to speak” at the school board meeting. Additionally, if the
school board does so, “it may set reasonable limits on the number, frequency and length of
presentations before it, but it may not unfairly discriminate among speakers for or against a
particular point of view” (p. 36). And, members of the public or school board may “raise a
subject that has not been included in the notice for the meeting, but any discussion of the subject
must be limited to a proposal to place the subject on the agenda for a future meeting” (p. 37).
(4) Board Decisions: A school board’s “final action, decision or vote on any matter
within its jurisdiction may be made only in an open session held in compliance with the notice
requirements” (p. 38). And, the school board “may not vote in an open session by secret written
ballot” or “take action by written agreement without a meeting” (p. 38).
Module 6: Parents and the Greater Community
8
References
Abbott, G. (2014). Open Meetings Act Handbook. Retrieved September 27, 2016, from
https://www.texasattorneygeneral.gov/files/og/openmeeting_hb.pdf
Epstein, J. (2002). Six types of parent involvement, in Leading learning communities: Standards
for what principals should know and be able to do (p. 73). Alexandria, VA: NAESP.
Robbins, P., & Alvy, H. B. (2004). The new principal's fieldbook: Strategies for success.
Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Wherry, J. (2010). Parent Involvement: Nine Truths You Must Know Now. Retrieved September
27, 2016, from http://www.esc16.net/users/0020/docs/NineTruths.pdf
Running Head: WORKING WITH THE MEDIA
Module 7: Working with the Media
Jeff Shaver
Angelo State University
EDG 6345 Human Relationships in Educational Administration
October 8, 2016
Module 7: Working with the Media
2
Working with the Media
Five keywords or phrases associated with the importance of an educational leader
establishing a positive working and professional relationship with the media are: (I) alliance, (II)
focus, (III) proactive leadership, (IV) news releases, and (V) crisis management.
(I) Alliance
Three things that are important to an educational leader creating a collaborative,
professional alliance and partnership with the news media, include:
• inviting the news media to “special events on a routine basis”
• keeping the news media “informed about new [school or district] programs”
• respectfully communicating with the media when dissatisfied with a story (Robbins and
Alvy, 2004, p. 260).
(II) Focus
In order to protect the interests of your school community, while remaining honest with
the news media, four pieces of information are important to keep in mind, which include the
educational leader focusing his/her discussions with the media on “[1] the school mission, [2]
teaching and [3] learning, and [4] student safety” (Robbins and Alvy, 2004, p. 257).
(III) Proactive Leadership
One interesting and important thing that I learned about being a proactive leader is
assessing the news coverage of the school or district by conducting “a newspaper, television, and
radio audit to discern positive and negative coverage, coverage accuracy, and capability to get a
Module 7: Working with the Media
3
story out,” so that the educational leader can seize opportunities to “showcase student work and
performance” (Robbins and Alvy, 2004, p. 259).
(IV) News Releases
In addition to insuring that the information contained within a news release is accurate,
jargon-free, no longer than a page, and well structured (i.e., addresses the who – what – when –
where – why with most important information in the first paragraph, use “END” or “more” at the
bottom of the page, and providing a date line, release date, contact person, and release date), one
interesting and important that that I learned about new releases is that “if only a cameraperson
shows for a story, make sure that he or she gets a copy of your news release” (Robbins and Alvy,
2004, p. 262).
(V) Crisis Management
Robbins and Avery (2004, p. 264-265) provide lots of great information about how an
educational leader should engage with the media during a crisis (e.g., identifying and
maintaining a media staging area, not saying “no comment” or speculating, obtaining consent
from staff members before agreeing to allow the media to interview them, and not letting
students under the age of 18 be interviewed without parental consent); however, one remaining
question that I have is how to handle a situation when a member of my school has engaged with
the media in a non-productive way that is not in the best interests of our school community.
Module 7: Working with the Media
4
References
Robbins, P., & Alvy, H. B. (2004). The new principal's fieldbook: Strategies for success.
Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Running Head: PRINCIPAL CERTIFICATION PORTFOLIO – ANGELO STATE UNIVERSITY
EDG 6341 - Role of the Principal
Jeff Shaver
Angelo State University
August – October 2016
Running Head: EDUCATIONAL LEADERSHIP COMPETENCY CONNECTIONS
Module 1: Educational Leadership Competency Connections
Jeff Shaver
Angelo State University
EDG 6341 Role of the Principal
August 25, 2016
Module 1: Educational Leadership Competency Connections
2
Educational Leadership Competency Connections
Standard 1.0:
“Facilitating the articulation, formulation, and dissemination of a school or district vision of
learning supported by the school community” (Educational Leadership Constituent Council,
2002, p. 4).
Reflective paragraph:
Educational leaders must be able to articulate the vision of their schools to all stakeholders,
involve various stakeholders in reformulating the vision if and when needed, and to hold all
stakeholders accountable to the shared vision. In my experience, being involved in the
examination and reformulating of the school vision has been extremely helpful to me in creating
a better sense of community and collective accountability.
Connection to theory of educational research:
According to Amanchukwu, Stanley, and Ololube (2015), most theories of leadership “can be
classified as one of Charry’s eight major type”. These include: (1) “Great Man” Theory, (2)
Trait Theory, (3) Contingency Theories, (4) Situational Theory, (5) Behavioral Theory, (6)
Participative Theory, (7) Transaction/Management Theory, and (8) Relationship/
Transformational Theory (Amanchukwu, Stanley & Ololube, 2015, p. 8; Charry, 2012). Based
on my understanding of these theories, I think that Standard 1.0 is reflected in the
Relationship/Transformational Theory because “relationship or transformational leaders
motivate and inspire people by helping group members see the importance of the task [school or
district vision]” (Amanchukwu, Stanley & Ololube, 2015, p. 9).
Module 1: Educational Leadership Competency Connections
3
Standard 2.0:
“Promoting and maintaining a positive school culture for learning, by promoting effective
instructional programs, by applying best practices to student learning, and by designing and
implementing comprehensive professional growth plans for staff” (Educational Leadership
Constituent Council, 2002, p. 4).
Reflective paragraph:
In my opinion, Standard 2.0 is one of the most important standards because it expects
educational leaders to honor the diversity and needs of all staff and students in order to promote
a positive school culture and learning community, and ensure that instructional programs utilize
curricular materials, pedagogy, and technology that results in student success for all students. In
my experience, doing this well involves a lot of shared expertise, communication and
collaboration, teamwork, and determination. I am a proponent of inclusive classrooms, which I
think gets at the heart of Standard 2.0.
Connection to theory of educational research:
Standard 2.0, particularly the implementation of comprehensive professional growth plans for
staff, seems to be reflected by the Participative Theory, where “participative leaders encourage
participation and contribution from group members and help group members to feel relevant and
committed to the decision-making process” (Amanchukwu, Stanley & Ololube, 2015, p. 9).
Thus, a participative leader would likely involve staff in developing and implementing his/her
own personal comprehensive professional growth plan, and evaluating and reflection on his/her
progress.
Module 1: Educational Leadership Competency Connections
4
Standard 3.0:
“Managing the organization, operations, and resources in a way that promotes a safe, efficient,
and effective learning environment” (Educational Leadership Constituent Council, 2002, p. 5).
Reflective paragraph:
Standard 3.0 really emphasizes that effective educational leaders must manage tools and
resources to optimize learning and student success by involving all staff in setting and
implementing normative instructional practices to which all are held accountable. An example
of this from my teaching experience is that as a school we implemented project-based learning
(PBL) to support student success for all students in all subjects. Our principal, therefore, had to
ensure that all staff members were provided position-appropriate professional development in
PBL. Our principal, among other things, had to also work thoughtfully and respectfully with
resistant faculty, set appropriate and realistic benchmarks and timelines for PBL implementation,
and evaluate and reflect on our progress and success based on student outcomes.
Connection to theory of educational research:
Since Standard 3.0 seems to involve a combination of managerial and leadership roles, which
require different decision-making process (e.g., autocratic, collaborative or democratic) for any
given circumstance or situation, this standard seems to be reflected in Situational Theory
(Amanchukwu, Stanley & Ololube, 2015, p. 8). According to Amanchukwu, Stanley, and
Ololube (2015), situational theory “proposes that leaders choose the best course of action based
upon situational conditions or circumstances” and “different styles of leadership may be more
appropriate for different types of decision-making” (Amanchukwu, Stanley & Ololube, 2015, p.
8).
Module 1: Educational Leadership Competency Connections
5
Standard 4.0:
“Collaborating with families and other community members, responding to diverse community
interests and needs, and mobilizing community resources” (Educational Leadership Constituent
Council, 2002, p. 5).
Reflective paragraph:
Standard 4.0 emphasizes that effective educational leaders are willing and able to respectfully
engage and collaborate with all members of the school community. For example, at one of my
previous schools many of our students were first-generation Americans from Eastern Africa and
Muslim. The challenge that faculty faced is that some of our Muslim students stated that at
particular times during the school year and at certain times of day they needed to be free to leave
class to pray, and faculty were concerned that these students were missing valuable class time
but did not want to limit the students’ religious freedoms. In order to address faculty concerns,
our principal consulted with the local East African Community Organization and Muslim parents
to come up with a suitable and respectful resolution. Ultimately, we learned that students didn’t
need to miss class to pray, but the process resulted in a stronger community.
Connection to theory of educational research:
Due to variety of stakeholders that are identified in Standard 4.0, it seems fitting that a
combination of leadership theories should be considered. These theories might include
contingency, situational, behavioral, and relationship/transformational theories. However, if we
specifically consider the role of effective educational leaders in collaborating with families and
the community, Standard 4.0 seems to be reflected in behavioral theory, which is “based on the
belief that great leaders are made, not born” and “focuses on the actions of leaders not on
intellectual qualities or internal states” (Amanchukwu, Stanley & Ololube, 2015, p. 8). In my
Module 1: Educational Leadership Competency Connections
6
opinion, families and the community want leaders that they have confidence in, but also want
leaders that make the effort to connect with them and are visibly involved in both the school
community and the community at large.
Standard 5.0:
“Demonstrating a respect for the rights of others and by acting responsibly” (Educational
Leadership Constituent Council, 2002, p. 6).
Reflective paragraph:
Standard 5.0 really emphasizes the importance of an effective educational leader being a role
model, and leading by example. There are lots of ways that I have experienced educational
leaders doing this, but I think that one of the simplest and most effective ways for educational
leaders to exemplify Standard 5.0 is to support students and staff both inside and outside of the
school (e.g., attend extracurricular activities and community events, and be involved with
charities and participate in community service).
Connection to theory of educational research:
Standard 5.0 is reflected in relationship/transformational theory, because “in these theories,
leadership is the process by which a person engages with others and is able to “create a
connection” that results in increased motivational morality in both followers and leaders”
(Amanchukwu, Stanley & Ololube, 2015, p. 8). In other words, a leader must do what is right,
fair, and equitable to support student success for all and lead his/her staff in doing the same.
Module 1: Educational Leadership Competency Connections
7
Standard 6.0:
“Articulating, analyzing and describing, and communicating the larger political, social,
economic, legal, and cultural context and advocating for all students” (Educational Leadership
Constituent Council, 2002, p. 6).
Reflective paragraph:
Standard 6.0 appears to be one of the most difficult standards, because what seems right might
not always be what is reflected by politics, laws, or cultural and community norms. But, it
suggests that the keys are to provide clarity, knowledge and transparency, with the emphasis and
focus being on equity and access for all students. For example, at one of my previous schools we
had to adopt new teacher evaluation standards that required all teachers to report and reflect on
student outcomes based on designated student demographics (e.g., race/ethnicity, gender), and to
propose solutions for addressing any gaps. Our data revealed that certain demographics of
students were underperforming in multiple subject areas, so we collaborated as a school on how
we could collectively address this issue, in partnership with families, to work towards ensuring
that all students are served and to fulfill our moral, ethical, and legal obligations.
Connection to theory of educational research:
In my opinion, transactional/management theory in isolation does not seem to reflect the best
approach to educational leadership; however, these theories do reflect the reality that schools and
districts are accountable and measured in their ability to promote and improve student success.
According to Amanchukwu, Stanley, and Ololube (2015), these theories “base leadership on a
system of rewards and punishment” and it’s the “leader’s job to create structures that make it
abundantly clear what is expected of followers and the consequences (rewards and
punishments)” (Amanchukwu, Stanley & Ololube, 2015, p. 8; Charry, 2012).
Module 1: Educational Leadership Competency Connections
8
References
Amanchukwu, R. N., Stanley, G. J., & Ololube, N. P. (2015). A Review of Leadership Theories,
Principles and Styles and Their Relevance to Educational Management. Management,
5(1), 6-14. doi:10.5923/j.mm.20150501.02
Charry, K. (2012). Leadership Theories – 8 Major Leadership Theories. Retrieved August 23,
2016 from https://www.verywell.com/leadership-theories-2795323
Educational Leadership Constituent Council (2002). Standards for Educational Leaders.
Retrieved August 23, 2016 from http://soe.unc.edu/academics/requirements/
standards/NCDPI-ELCC_ Educational_Leaders_Standards.pdf
Running Head: PRINCIPAL INTERVIEW – COMMUNICATING YOUR VISION
Module 2: Principal Interview – Communicating Your Vision
Jeff Shaver
Angelo State University
EDG 6341 Role of the Principal
September 2, 2016
Module 2: Principal Interview – Communicating Your Vision
2
Principal Interview – Communicating Your Vision
Collaborating with an Administrator to Determine Effective Communication Strategies
Disseminating administrative policies to stakeholders
According to the Educational Leadership Constituent Council (2002), a vital competency
(Standard 1) for effective educational leaders is to facilitate the “articulation, formulation, and
dissemination of a school or district vision of learning supported by the school community” (p.
4). In order to gain the perspective of an administrator in the field, on how to effectively
communicate the school or district vision to stakeholders, I interviewed Trevor Greene, the
former principal at Toppenish High School (Toppenish, WA) and current Instructional
Leadership Executive Director (ILED) in Highline Public Schools (Burien, WA).
As one of Highline’s ILEDs, Trevor supports and supervises secondary principals
throughout the district. Trevor is a great leader and mentor to many, including me, and has more
accomplishments then I can possibly list. However, I have shared a few of his accomplishments
here:
• Named the Washington State High School Principal of the Year for 2012 and
National High School Principal of the Year for 2013 by the National Association
of Secondary School Principals (NASSP).
• Taught middle school and high school levels and served as principal and later as
instructional leader at Toppenish High School.
• While principal at Toppenish High School,
§ increased the graduation rate to 94%
§ implemented nationally certified engineering and biomedical programs
Module 2: Principal Interview – Communicating Your Vision
3
§ school recognized as a 2012 STEM Lighthouse School by the Office of
Superintendent of Public Instruction
I hope you can see, from his many accomplishments, why I chose to interview Trevor on
how he has communicated his vision both at Toppenish High School and within Highline Public
Schools.
Now, getting down to business, one of the indicators (i.e., Indicator 4) of Standard 1
(Educational Leadership Constituent Council, 2002) states that educational leaders must be able
to “disseminate administrative polices and practices by communicating effectively with all
stakeholders concerning implementation and realization of the vision” (p. 4). Based on his time
as the principal at Toppenish High School, T. Greene stated that “They [administrative policies]
were presented to the board, and then during another meeting on a different month, they were
finalized. There was no intentionality of distributing policy information other than what occurred
at the monthly board meeting” (personal communication, September 1, 2016; Appendix A).
T. Greene also stated, based on his current position as Instructional Leadership Executive
Director for Highline Public Schools, that “policies are communicated through the actual board
meetings, board minutes, and are accessible on our website. There is always an initial reading,
followed by time in between for community members to organize and/or prepare responses.
They are then finalized at a later board meeting” (personal communication, September 1, 2016;
Appendix B). Therefore, in Trevor’s experiences, the dissemination of policy information was
primarily done via board meeting proceedings and minutes.
Module 2: Principal Interview – Communicating Your Vision
4
Formulating initiatives to motivate your school community – Toppenish High School
Another indicator (i.e., Indicator 3) of Standard 1 (Educational Leadership Constituent
Council, 2002) states that educational leaders must be able to “formulate the initiatives necessary
to motivate staff, parents, students, board and community members to achieve the school or
district’s vision by involving all stakeholders in collaborative discussions.” (p. 4). While
principal at Toppenish High School, T. Greene stated that “initiatives were formed either at the
district level or started in the grassroots level in buildings” but that “when things happen at the
schools, then the parents and community are more actively involved” (personal communication,
September 1, 2016; Appendix A). Therefore, in order to get more involvement in district level
initiatives, it is important “to be very intentional when starting new initiatives or programs” (T.
Greene, personal communication, September 1, 2016; Appendix A).
T. Greene further explained that being more intentional meant that “the topic is
researched, data is gathered, and community/teacher groups come together to analyze and
discuss the process back to rollout/adoption” and that “facilitation was always handled by
administrators in the district” (personal communication, September 1, 2016; Appendix A).
Finally, according to Trevor, “The involvement of multiple stakeholders, and the process
of conversing about topics naturally motivates participants to want to learn more and contribute
more to the system. One important thing to remember, is the need to always keep your
community engaged. This requires intentional share-outs on progress and active media
manipulation” (T. Greene, personal communication, September 1, 2016; Appendix A).
Therefore, according to Trevor, initiatives at the school or district level require a different focus
and intentionality, and that the involvement of stakeholders in meaningful discourse can be
motivating and increase everyone’s engagement and contributions.
Module 2: Principal Interview – Communicating Your Vision
5
Formulating initiatives to motivate your school community – Highline Public Schools
With respect to his current role in Highline Public Schools, Trevor explained that his
district “is currently at the end of the three-year strategic plan” and that “the original
organization/approval of the plan was an endeavor that included the entire community” (T.
Greene, personal communication, September 1, 2016; Appendix B). He goes on to explain that
the “strategic plan is shared with every new employee during the orientation process” and “is
also published on the website and updated with achieved benchmarks yearly” (T. Greene,
personal communication, September 1, 2016; Appendix B). Additionally, he said that “an actual
hard copy of their strategic plan and completed goals, or progress toward, is distributed to all
families in the district” (T. Greene, personal communication, September 1, 2016; Appendix B).
Additionally, Trevor explains that Highline Public Schools has “bold goals” and that
“they range from mastery at grade 3 to a goal of zero suspensions, and…every student bilingual
by 2026” (T. Greene, personal communication, September 1, 2016; Appendix B). In sharing
this, he emphasized that “all of these [bold goals] can be found on our website” (T. Greene,
personal communication, September 1, 2016; Appendix B). He concludes by saying that “we
[Highline Public Schools] also have an overarching promise, which is to know "every student by
name, strength, and need…" The Highline promise, and the progress towards meeting our
strategic plan goals, are regularly called out on social media, as well” (T. Greene, personal
communication, September 1, 2016; Appendix B). Therefore, as Trevor explains, Highline
Public Schools involved the community in creating their shared strategic plan, the strategic plan
and achievement of benchmarks is shared with all employees and families, and that the strategic
plan involves “bold goals” focused on students successes that are valued by the community.
Module 2: Principal Interview – Communicating Your Vision
6
Communicating a shared vision
The final two indicators (i.e., Indicator 1 and 2) of Standard 1 (Educational Leadership
Constituent Council, 2002) state that educational leaders must be able to “articulate a vision of
learning by using relevant knowledge and theories that promote the success of all students” and
“by demonstrating the skills necessary to implement, support, and communicate a shared
commitment to the vision” (p. 4). During our interview, Trevor and I didn’t discuss specific
theories; however, he did emphasize the importance of utilizing multiple communication streams
and language.
According to Trevor, “A shared vision is most effectively communicated by speaking it
and all that you do. Aside from that, it can be shared over social media, radio, newspapers, etc. In
Toppenish, we always made sure to utilize the Spanish-language channel, which was a staple of
our Spanish-speaking population” (T. Greene, personal communication, September 1, 2016;
Appendix A). And in Highline Public Schools, T. Greene indicated that they “have over 100
languages spoken, so more media print material is used to disseminate information” (personal
communication, September 1, 2016; Appendix B). Therefore, according to Trevor, it is
important to articulate and exemplify your vision, and to insure that how you communicate your
vision (e.g., language) is very important.
Module 2: Principal Interview – Communicating Your Vision
7
Reference
Educational Leadership Constituent Council (2002). Standards for Educational Leaders.
Retrieved August 23, 2016 from http://soe.unc.edu/academics/requirements/
standards/NCDPI-ELCC_ Educational_Leaders_Standards.pdf
Module 2: Principal Interview – Communicating Your Vision
8
Appendix A: Principal Interview
Interviewee: Trevor Greene, Former Principal, Toppenish High School (Toppenish, WA)
Questions:
1. How were administrative policies at Toppenish High School disseminated to
stakeholders?
Trevor: I was in a small rural district. The policies were adopted according to the
same process in the big district. They were presented to the board, and then during
another meeting on a different month, they were finalized. There was no intentionality of
distributing policy information other than what occurred at the monthly board meeting.
2. How were Toppenish High School initiatives to motivate staff, parents, students, board
and community members formulated?
Trevor: Initiatives were formed either at the district level or started in the
grassroots level in buildings. The beauty of a smaller district is that more collective
involvement happens at a quicker pace. When things happen at the schools, then the
parents and community are more actively involved in the process. The only way to
combat this at the district level is to be very intentional when starting a new
initiatives/programs.
The topic is researched, data is gathered, and community/teacher groups come
together to analyze and discuss the process back to rollout/adoption. Facilitation was
always handled by administrators in the district.
The involvement of multiple stakeholders, and the process of conversing about
topics naturally motivates participants to want to learn more and contribute more to the
Module 2: Principal Interview – Communicating Your Vision
9
system. One important thing to remember, is the need to always keep your community
engaged. This requires intentional share-outs on progress and active media manipulation.
3. How can a shared vision be communicated?
Trevor: A shared vision is most effectively communicated by speaking it and all
that you do. Aside from that, it can be shared over social media, radio, newspapers, etc.
In Toppenish, we always made sure to utilize the Spanish-language channel, which was a
staple of our Spanish-speaking population.
Module 2: Principal Interview – Communicating Your Vision
10
Appendix B: Principal Interview
Interviewee: Trevor Greene, Instructional Leadership Executive Director, Highline Public
Schools (Burien, WA)
Questions:
1. How are administrative policies in Highline Public Schools disseminated to
stakeholders?
Trevor: Policies are communicated through the actual board meetings, board
minutes, and are accessible on our website. There is always an initial reading, followed
by time in between for community members to organize and/or prepare responses. They
are then finalized at a later board meeting.
2. How are Highline Public Schools initiatives to motivate staff, parents, students, board
and community members formulated?
Trevor: Highline school district is currently at the end of the three-year strategic
plan. The original organization/approval of the plan wasn't endeavor to do that included
the entire community. In fact, it included members from five municipalities, as we cover
multiple cities. Mutual work with a professional strategic organization brought the correct
stakeholders together and assured the process of total inclusion.
The strategic plan is shared with every new employee during the orientation
process. It is also published on the website and updated with achieved benchmarks
yearly. In addition, an actual hard copy of their strategic plan and completed goals, or
progress toward, is distributed to all families in the district.
Module 2: Principal Interview – Communicating Your Vision
11
We have, what we referred to, bold goals. They range from mastery at grade 3 to
a goal of zero suspensions, and even one that would have every student bilingual by
2026. (All of these can be found on our website.). We also have an overarching promise,
which is to know "every student by name, strength, and need…" The Highline promise,
and the progress towards meeting our strategic plan goals, are regularly called out on
social media, as well.
3. How can a shared vision be communicated?
Trevor: In Highline, we have over 100 languages spoken, so more media print
material is used to disseminate information.
Running Head: PROFESSIONAL LEARNING COMMUNITIES AND LEADERSHIP
Module 3: Relating Professional Learning Communities to Principal Competencies
Jeff Shaver
Angelo State University
EDG 6341 Role of the Principal
September 10, 2016
Module 3: Relating Professional Learning Communities to Principal Competencies
2
Relating Professional Learning Communities to Principal Competencies
Professional Learning Communities: The Role of an Educational Leader
According to Hirsh and Hord (2008), “To support learning for administrators, teachers,
and students, PLCs [Professional Learning Communities] share five research-based dimensions”:
(1) shared and supportive leadership; (2) a shared vision; (3) supportive structural and relational
conditions; (4) intentional, collegial learning; and (5) shared practice (p. 27).
Hirsh and Hord (2008) state that a PLC “should be a self-governing entity in which
democratic participation is the norm and the principal feels comfortable sharing leadership” (p.
27). Therefore, a PLC with a “shared and supportive leadership” and “a shared vision” (Hirsch
and Hord, 2008, p. 27), relates very closely with Standard 1.0 of the Standards for Educational
Leaders, which states that educational leaders should facilitate the “articulation, formulation, and
dissemination of a school or district vision of learning supported by the school community”
(Educational Leadership Constituent Council, 2002, p. 4). Therefore, the use of PLCs could be
an effective initiative to involve staff in collaboratively achieving a school’s vision.
As stated by Hirsh and Hord (2008), “The third research-based dimension [of a PLC] is
establishing supportive structural and relational conditions” (p. 27). For example, the principal
must use his or her “power to solve logistical problems and provide structures to build
relationships” (p. 27). Additionally, according to Hirsh and Hord (2008), “Successful PLCs
operate within schools where administrators, teachers, parents, and students respect, positively
esteem, and trust one another” (p. 27). Therefore, the third-dimension of a PLC relates very well
to Standard 2.0 of the Standards for Educational Leaders, which states that educational leaders
must “have the knowledge and ability to support the success of all students by promoting and
Module 3: Relating Professional Learning Communities to Principal Competencies
3
maintaining a positive school culture for learning” (Educational Leadership Constituent Council,
2002, p. 4), but is also reflected in Standards 3.0 through 6.0.
Standard 3.0: Indicator 1 relates to “establishing supportive structural and relational
conditions,” because it states that educational leaders must “manage organizations by using
research-based knowledge of…organizational development…to optimize learning” (Educational
Leadership Constituent Council, 2002, p. 5), and the use of PLCs is a research-based approach to
organizational development focused on optimizing learning through collaboration.
Standard 4.0 relates, because the use of PLCs can, according to Indicator 2, allow an
educational leader to “respond to diversity of the school and the community by monitoring,
adjusting, and improving school programs to meet the diverse needs of all students” (Educational
Leadership Constituent Council, 2002, p. 5). And, Standard 5.0 and 6.0 relate, because they state
that an educational leader must “promote the success of all students by demonstrating a respect
for the rights of others” and “analyze and describe the social, economic, and cultural context in a
school community” (Educational Leadership Constituent Council, 2002, p. 5).
To be effective, PLCs require an educational leader to respect the rights and opinions of
others and demonstrate the willingness to use research-based approaches to promote student
learning by providing structures to build relationships. Additionally, the final two research-
based dimensions of a PLC: intentional, collegial learning; and shared practice, according to
Hirsh and Hord (2008), state that “the community must begin its work by determining what it
will learn together” (e.g., curricula, instructional strategies, student motivation) and “sharing
personal practice through follow up and coaching” (p. 27-28), and relate to aspects of all of the
Standards for Educational Leaders (Educational Leadership Constituent Council, 2002).
Module 3: Relating Professional Learning Communities to Principal Competencies
4
Professional Learning Communities: Impact on Student Success
According to Hirsh and Hord (2008), an educational leader “plays a strong directing role
at the initiation of the PLC, then steps back to support leadership opportunities and leadership
development of the staff” (p. 28). And, if a leader focuses on being a “leaner as opposed to
solely a facilitator” then “staff involvement in school decisions and actions provides the principal
with partners who help in managing and leading the school” (Hirsh and Hord, 2008, p. 28).
As a teacher, I have experienced both effective and ineffective PLCs. For example, at
one of my former schools our educational leaders established an effective PLC that improved
student achievement on standardized tests through a schoolwide project-based learning (PBL)
approach. However, the same educational leaders failed, in my opinion, to create an effective
PLC, focused on combating institutionalized racism and improving the academic success of all
students, because they were too quick to make recommendations, and didn’t establish a shared
vision or a safe environment for collaborative conversations. I respect my former educational
leaders for their efforts, but in this case they violated most, if not all, the tenets of a PLC.
However, with respect to our PBL-focused PLC that exhibited all the tenets of PLCs, our
schoolwide implementation of PBL was a byproduct of collaborative discussions and shared
vision (i.e., improve test scores), but also involved lots of staff training on the implementation of
PBL, making continuous improvements through collegial learning, and meaningful observations
and reflections of our practice that were facilitated by our educational leaders.
Ultimately, one important lesson that I have learned is that the things (e.g., issues,
initiatives, policies) that an educational leader is the most passionate about are the ones that an
educational leader can inadvertently create unwanted barriers to or conflicts with if he or she
doesn’t abide by the tenets of PLCs, and facilitate the fulfillment of a shared vision.
Module 3: Relating Professional Learning Communities to Principal Competencies
5
References
Educational Leadership Constituent Council (2002). Standards for Educational Leaders.
Retrieved August 23, 2016 from http://soe.unc.edu/academics/requirements/
standards/NCDPI-ELCC_ Educational_Leaders_Standards.pdf
Hirsh, S., & Hord, S. M. (2008, December). Leader and Learner. Principal Leadership, 26-30.
Optimizing Learning in Mathematics
Jeff Shaver Module 4: Learning Environments EDG 6341 Role of the Principal Angelo State University Fall 2016
Optimizing Learning in Mathematics
Session goal
2
Teachers will develop and use a common understanding of standards for mathematical practice1 and research-based strategies for increasing student achievement2 to enhance teaching and learning.
1(Standards for Mathematical Practice, 2016) 2(Dean, Hubbell, Pitler, Stone and Marzano, 2012)
Using a set of structured tools to promote conversation and collaboration, I will… • Explore the following Standards for Mathematical Practice (SMP) and
recognize the critical role they play in the development of students’ mathematical thinking:
• SMP 3: Construct viable arguments and critique the reasoning of others.
• SMP 7: Look for and make use of structure.
• I will develop and use a common understanding of the following research-based strategies to increase student achievement:
• Identifying similarity and differences
• Cooperative Learning
Learning expectations
3
Optimizing Learning in Mathematics
Video: Math Class Needs a Makeover
4
Meyer, D. (2010, March). TED: Math Class Needs a Makeover [video]. Retrieved fromhttp://www.ted.com/talks/dan_meyer_math_curriculum_makeover.
Optimizing Learning in Mathematics
Think-Pair-Share: Individual Study & Table Discussion
5
Standards for Mathematical Practice • SMP 3: Construct Viable Arguments and Critique the
Reasoning of Others
• SMP 7: Look for and make use of structure.
Research-Based Strategies • Identifying similarities and differences
• Collaborative learning
Optimizing Learning in Mathematics
6
SMP 2: Reason abstractly and quantitatively
Must contextualize and decontextualize. Creating a coherent representation of the problem at hand; considering the units involved; attending to the meaning of quantities, not just how to compute them.
TEACHERS
STUDENTS
TEACHERS
What can be seen as the teachers incorporate
this SMP?
STUDENTS
What can be seen as the students incorporate
this SMP?
Optimizing Learning in Mathematics
Activity: Building a common understanding of SMP 3 & 7
7
• Will SMP 3 & 7 manifest themselves in the
same way across grade levels?
• Will addressing these SMPs help us
address the changes that Dan Meyer said
needed to happen?
Points to Ponder
Reflection
Optimizing Learning in Mathematics
Button Activity Gita plays with her grandmother’s collection of buttons. She arranges them in patterns.
Her first 3 patterns are shown on the handout provided.
Engaging in mathematics using the SMP 3 & 7
8
Optimizing Learning in Mathematics
Evidence of SMPs 3 & 7
9
While watching the video, use the chart to record student and teacher actions and dialogue.
What are students saying and doing?
What is the teacher saying and doing?
Optimizing Learning in Mathematics
Video: Engaging in mathematics using the SMP 3 & 7
10
Source: http://www.insidemathematics.org
Optimizing Learning in Mathematics
• How did the teacher purposefully engage students in the…
• Standards for Mathematical Practice 3 & 7? • Identifying similarities and differences? • Collaborative learning?
Reflection: SMPs and Research-Based Strategies
11
Optimizing Learning in Mathematics
• How did the teacher purposefully engage students in the…
• Standards for Mathematical Practice 3 & 7? • Identifying similarities and differences? • Collaborative learning?
Reflection: SMPs and Research-Based Strategies
12
Record in your journal: • What changes will you make in order to engage
students in the mathematical practices and research-based strategies to increase student achievement?
Optimizing Learning in Mathematics
Now that you’ve experienced the activity as a learner, take a few moments to reflect on the task itself. What are rich mathematical tasks? • A silver bullet? • Something for bright kids? • Those done after the students understand the skills? • Difficult? • For end of term/year? • Something someone else does?
Reflecting on the task
13
Optimizing Learning in Mathematics
• Students as the workers and the decisionmakers
• High-level thinking and reasoning by students
• Multiple layers of complexity
• Multiple entry points
• Multiple solutions and/or strategies
• Discussion or active inquiry
• Contextual
• Encourage multiple ways to solve
• Encourage collaboration
Rich mathematical tasks include:
14
Rich Tasks
Content Standards
Standards for Mathematical
Practice
Rigor
Optimizing Learning in Mathematics
• How does studying the standards for mathematical practice and research-based strategies in this way deepen your understanding of the integration of these standards and strategies in your teaching?
• What is the value of thinking about the implications for teaching and learning?
Reflection
15
Optimizing Learning in Mathematics
Let’s look back: 3 – 2 – 1 Learning expectations
16
Using a set of structured tools to promote conversation and collaboration, I will… • Explore the following Standards for Mathematical Practice (SMP) and
recognize the critical role they play in the development of students’ mathematical thinking:
• SMP 3: Construct viable arguments and critique the reasoning of others.
• SMP 7: Look for and make use of structure.
• I will develop and use a common understanding of the following research-based strategies to increase student achievement:
• Identifying similarity and differences
• Cooperative Learning
Optimizing Learning in Mathematics
Evaluation
17
Please take a moment to fill
out our survey.
Optimizing Learning in Mathematics
References
Optimizing Learning in Mathematics
Dean, C. B., Hubbell, E. R., Pitler, H., Stone, B., & Marzano, R. J. (2012). Classroom instruction that works: Research-based strategies for increasing student achievement. Alexandria, VA: ASCD.
Standards for Mathematical Practice. (n.d.). Retrieved
September 14, 2016, from http://www.corestandards. org/Math/Practice/
Running Head: COLLABORATION – DEMOGRAPHICS & NEEDS ASSESSMENT
Module 5: Collaboration – Demographics and Needs Assessment
Jeff Shaver
Angelo State University
EDG 6341 Role of the Principal
September 25, 2016
Module 5: Collaboration – Demographics and Needs Assessment
2
Collaboration – Demographics and Needs Assessment:
Evaluating the demographics of a district to determine interests and needs
that positively affect student learning
Background: 2015-16 Washington State Report Card – Highline Public Schools
According to Higgins (2015), “For the first time in five years, Highline Public Schools
has posted a graduation rate that cleared 70 percent, climbing 7.4 percentage points in just the
past school year.” However, Higgins (2015) warns, “Highline’s 70.3 percent rate for the class of
2015 is still lower than the statewide average for the class of 2014, which was about 77 percent.”
Therefore, in an effort to deliver on their promise “that every student is known by name,
strength, and need, and graduates prepared for college, career and citizenship,” Highline Public
Schools is on a mission to use blended and personalized learning as a “pathway to equity”
(Office of Educational Technology, n.d.). And, more specifically, according to Highline Public
Schools: Personalized Learning as a Pathway to Equity, “To deliver on [their] promise, in 2013
the district adopted a bold, four-year strategic plan that commits to at least 19 out of 20 students
being proficient in core subjects by third grade, passing Algebra by ninth grade, and graduating
from high school bilingual, biliterate, tech-savy, and tech-literate” (Office of Educational
Technology).
As you can see from Highline Public Schools’ 2015-16 Washington State Report Card
(see Appendix A), they serve a richly diverse student population of nearly 20,000 just south of
Seattle. For example, 37.9% of their student population is Hispanic, 14.4% Asian, and 13.0%
Black/African American. However, 87.3% (993 of 1137) of their classroom teachers are white.
Therefore, an effective and creative blended and personalized learning platform could be utilized
Module 5: Collaboration – Demographics and Needs Assessment
3
to support teachers in bringing out and reflecting the culture of their diverse students (e.g.,
learning modules could contain videos of underrepresented professionals introducing lessons
containing culturally-relevant contexts).
Additionally, 65.3% of Highline Public School students are on free or reduced-priced
meals, 15.2% are in special education, and 25.8% are transitional bilingual. Again, blended and
personalized learning systems could support the learning of all students, by enhancing reading
and writing skills, expressing their knowledge and ideas, and providing them learning or
language support, as needed. However, it is clear the Highline Public Schools is facing a
challenging, but doable task of raising their students’ performance on standards-based
assessments (SBAs).
With respect to SBAs, the range of percentages of students passing grade-level English
Language Arts (ELA) SBAs is 40.7% to 66.5%, 13.0% to 49.2% for Math, and 48.4% to 58.2%
for Science. Though all of these percentages are much lower than is needed to ensure that all
Highline graduates are “prepared for college, career and citizenship,” the 13% of students that
are passing the 11th grade Math SBA is particularly troubling. It is, therefore, my hope that math
is a particular focus of the blended and personalized learning approach for Highline Public
Schools.
Highline’s “blended learning combines teacher facilitated instruction, small group work,
and technology-enabled individual learning to provide personalization and flexibility of time,
place, pace for each learner” that allows students to flexibly “achieve specific learning
outcomes” (Office of Educational Technology). According to the Superintendent of Highline
Public Schools, Dr. Susan Enfield, their district’s top priority “is ensuring that our kids have the
same opportunities that kids living in more affluent areas have” and that this is the “driver behind
Module 5: Collaboration – Demographics and Needs Assessment
4
personalized learning in the Highline district” (Office of Educational Technology). However,
“Highline realized that one of the central challenges of implementing personalized learning
across and entire district is creating a shared vision and engaging stakeholders at all levels”
(Office of Educational Technology).
Therefore, to “realize its vision of personalized learning as a pathway to equitable
opportunities for all learners,” Highline Public Schools should (1) provide blended and
personalized learning for both students and teachers using the same system and methods, (2)
utilize their district personalized learning task force to support and nurture implementation of
their blended and personalized learning system, and (3) establish or utilize culturally responsive
teaching (CRT) teams to continuously ensure equitable, culturally-relevant, and rigorous
instruction for all students at every school (see Figure 1).
Figure 1. A vision for utilizing blended and personalized learning for both Highline Public Schools students and teachers, a district task force, and culturally responsive teaching teams to ensure equity and success for all students. Based on information from the Office of Educational Technology, Highline Public Schools 2013-2017 Strategic Plan, and Howard (2007).
Module 5: Collaboration – Demographics and Needs Assessment
5
Blended and Personalized Learning for Students: Highline Public Schools
According to Howard (2007), like Highline Public Schools, “Many education leaders in
diversity-enhanced schools are moving beyond blame and befuddlement and working to
transform themselves and their schools to serve all their student well.” Additionally, Howard
(2007) states that “this transformative work proceeds best in five phases: (1) building trust, (2)
engaging personal culture, (3) confronting issues of social dominance and social justice, (4)
transforming instructional practices, and (5) engaging the entire school community.” With
respect to Highline Publics Schools, their Community 2013-2017 Strategic Plan and Instructional
Focus (see References) are a record of their shared community vision to ensure the success of all
students, and reflects their building of trust, engagement in the varied and shared cultures of their
school community, and dedication to providing their diverse student population with the same
learning opportunities as students in more affluent districts.
As is outlined in the Standards for Educational Leaders (Educational Leadership
Constituent Council, 2002), with respect to equitable teaching and instruction, effective
educational leaders should:
• Standard 1: Facilitate “the articulation, formulation, and dissemination of a school or
district vision of learning supported by the school community.”
• Standard 2: Promote and maintain “a positive school culture for learning, by promoting
effective instructional programs, by applying best practices to student learning, and by
designing and implementing comprehensive professional growth plans [that involve
professional growth in the use technology and effective instructional programs] for staff.”
• Standard 3: Promote a “safe, efficient, and effective learning environment.”
• Standard 4: Respond “to diverse community interests and needs” and mobilize
“community resources.”
Module 5: Collaboration – Demographics and Needs Assessment
6
Therefore, Highline Public Schools’ focus on using blended and personalized learning for
both students and teachers as “a pathway to equity” (Office of Educational Technology) is within
the standards of effective educational leadership (see Figure 1). And, community resources can
also be mobilized by utilizing a personalized learning task force (Office of Educational
Technology) and culturally responsive teaching (CRT) teams (Howard, 2007).
Blended and Personalized Learning for Teachers: Highline Public Schools
According to Kurshan (2015), “As a result of shifts to deepen learning practices and the
increased access to technology, state education agencies and local school districts [e.g., Highline
Public Schools] have created policies to support online and blended learning” [Watson, 2015].
However, “many school districts” according Kurshan (2015) “have failed to offer quality
professional development to help teachers use rich pedagogical strategies in blended in online
learning contexts.”
Therefore, as Kurshan (2015) states, “The White House recognized this gap in teacher
training and launched the ConnectEd Initiative to support teacher learning” and “the 2015 NMC
Horizon Report notes two avenues for addressing this issue: teachers enrolling in relevant
coursework offered by institutions of higher education [e.g., Virtual Online Teaching (VOLT)
Certification program at the University of Pennsylvania] and teachers perusing free and paid
online resources available on the internet.” However, in my opinion, I think that it is best to
utilize the same blended and personalized learning platform and system for teacher professional
development that is being utilized for student learning. Therefore, teachers can better develop
and implement blended and personalized learning based on their own personal learning
experiences.
Module 5: Collaboration – Demographics and Needs Assessment
7
References
2013-2017 Strategic Plan - Instructional Focus. (n.d.). Retrieved September 25, 2016, from
http://www.highlineschools.org/cms/lib07/WA01919413/Centricity/domain/1145/stategic
plan/Highline-Public-Schools-Instructional-Focus.pdf
2015-16 Washington State Report Card - Highline School District. (n.d.). Retrieved September
25, 2016, from http://reportcard.ospi.k12.wa.us/summary.aspx?year=2015-16
Community 2013-2017 Strategic Plan for Highline Public Schools. (n.d.). Retrieved September
25, 2016, from http://www.highlineschools.org/cms/lib07/WA01919413/Centricity/
domain/1145/stategic plan/Highline-Public-Schools-Strategic-Plan-Overview.pdf
ConnectED: President Obama's Plan for Connecting All Schools to the Digital Age. (n.d.).
Retrieved September 25, 2016, from
https://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/docs/connected_fact_sheet.pdf
Educational Leadership Constituent Council (2002). Standards for Educational Leaders.
Retrieved August 23, 2016 from http://soe.unc.edu/academics/requirements/
standards/NCDPI-ELCC_ Educational_Leaders_Standards.pdf
Higgins, J. (2015). For first time in five years, Highline's graduation rate tops 70 percent.
Retrieved September 25, 2016, from http://www.seattletimes.com/education-lab/highline-
school-district-tops-70-percent-graduation-rate-for-class-of-2015/
Howard, G. R. (2007). As Diversity Grows, So Must We. Educational Leadership - Responding
to Changing Demographics, 64(6), 16-22. Retrieved September 25, 2016, from
http://www.ascd.org/publications/educational-leadership/mar07/vol64/num06/As-
Diversity-Grows,-So-Must-We.aspx
Module 5: Collaboration – Demographics and Needs Assessment
8
Kurshan, B. (2015). The Teacher as the Learner: Professional Development for Online and
Blended Learning. Retrieved September 25, 2016, from
http://www.forbes.com/sites/barbarakurshan/2015/11/19/the-teacher-as-the-learner-
professional-development-for-online-and-blended-learning/#6ec0fc482292
NCLB Comprehensive Needs Assessment - Maine. (n.d.). Retrieved September 25, 2016, from
http://www.maine.gov/education/nclb/schoolwide/sample_comp_assessment.pdf
NMC Horizon Report: 2015 K-12 Edition. (2015). Retrieved September 25, 2016, from
http://cdn.nmc.org/media/2015-nmc-horizon-report-k12-EN.pdf
The NMC Horizon Report: 2015 K-12 Edition examines emerging technologies for their
potential impact on and use in teaching, learning, and creative inquiry in schools.
Office of Educational Technology (n.d.). Highline Public Schools: Personalized Learning as a
Pathway to Equity. Retrieved September 25, 2016, from
http://tech.ed.gov/stories/highline/
Virtual Online Teaching Certificate Program (VOLT). (2016). Retrieved September 25, 2016,
from https://www.gse.upenn.edu/innovation/volt
Watson, J. (2015). Blended Learning: The Evolution of Online and Face-to-Face Education from
2008-2015. Retrieved September 25, 2016, from http://www.inacol.org/wp-
content/uploads/2015/07/iNACOL_Blended-Learning-The-Evolution-of-Online-And-
Face-to-Face-Education-from-2008-2015.pdf
Module 5: Collaboration – Demographics and Needs Assessment
9
Appendix A
Highline School District District Web Site Superintendent Susan Enfield
206.631.3070 15675 AMBAUM BLVD SW BURIEN 98166-0100Puget Sound Educational Service District 121
Grade Span: PK-13
Select a year: 2015-16
2015-16 Results (Administration Info)
Grade Level SBA ELA SBA Math3rd Grade 42.6% 49.2%4th Grade 43.4% 44.6%5th Grade 46.6% 36.1%6th Grade 44.5% 37.4%7th Grade 40.7% 36.9%8th Grade 48.0% 35.9%11th Grade 66.5% 13.0%
Grade Level MSP Science5th Grade 48.4%8th Grade 57.1%
Grade Level * EOC Biology10th Grade 58.2%
Student Demographics
EnrollmentOctober 2015 Student Count 19,576May 2016 Student Count 19,672Gender (October 2015)Male 10,235 52.3%Female 9,341 47.7%Race/Ethnicity (October 2015)Hispanic / Latino of any race(s) 7,422 37.9%American Indian / Alaskan Native 169 0.9%Asian 2,816 14.4%Black / African American 2,542 13.0%Native Hawaiian / Other Pacific Islander 810 4.1%White 4,582 23.4%Two or More Races 1,235 6.3%Special ProgramsFree or Reduced-Price Meals (May 2016) 12,840 65.3%Special Education (May 2016) 2,993 15.2%Transitional Bilingual (May 2016) 5,077 25.8%Migrant (May 2016) 10 0.1%Section 504 (May 2016) 325 1.7%Other Information (more info)Unexcused Absence Rate (2015-16) 23,335 1.2%Adjusted 4-Year Cohort Graduation Rate (Class of 2015) 70.3%Adjusted 5-year Cohort Graduation Rate (Class of 2014) 72.3%College/University enrollment rates of graduates
Teacher Information (2015-16) (more info)
Classroom Teachers 1,137 Hispanic / Latino of any race(s) 42 American Indian / Alaskan Native 3 Asian 58 Black / African American 20 Native Hawaiian / Other Pacific Islander 2 White 993 Two or More Races 19Average Years of Teacher Experience 9.9 Hispanic / Latino of any race(s) 8.5 American Indian / Alaskan Native 20.6 Asian 7.6 Black / African American 9.9 Native Hawaiian / Other Pacific Islander 1 White 9.9 Two or More Races 16.8Teachers with at least a Master's Degree 64.8%Total number of teachers who teach core academic classes 917% of teachers teaching with an emergency certificate 0.0%% of teachers teaching with a conditional certificate 0.0%Total number of core academic classes 2,984ESEA Highly Qualified Teacher Information% of classes taught by teachers meeting ESEA highly qualified
Module 5: Collaboration – Demographics and Needs Assessment
10
* End of Course (EOC) Biology is administered in any grade in which thecourse is offered. Prior to 2015, EOC Math exams were given in any gradein which the course is offered and served as the state’s accountability testin mathematics. As of 2015, EOC Math tests are taken only for the purposeof meeting assessment graduation requirements by students in the classesof 2018 and prior.
** The "Makeup" exam was given to students who had already completedthe Year 1 or Year 2 coursework. It was not a "retake".
(HQ) definition 93.8%
% of classes taught by teachers who do not meet ESEA HQdefinition 6.2%
% of classes in high poverty schools taught by teachers whomeet ESEA HQ definition 95.0%
% of classes in high poverty schools taught by teachers whodo not meet ESEA HQ definition 5.1%
% of classes in low poverty schools taught by teachers whomeet ESEA HQ definition 93.2%
% of classes in low poverty schools taught by teachers whodo not meet ESEA HQ definition 6.8%
Running Head: ETHICS AND RIGHTS ASSESSMENT
Module 6: Ethics and Rights Assessment –
Promoting the Cultural Competency of a School
Jeff Shaver
Angelo State University
EDG 6341 Role of the Principal
October 2, 2016
Role of the Principal Module 6: Ethics and Rights Template -‐ Promoting the Cultural Competency of a School
ELCC Standards for Educational Leaders
Example of issue or topic related to this standard in education
presently
Ethical Principles related to this situation
or topic
Legal Principles related to this situation or topic
Ties to or impact on the PLC process/leadership
responsibilities
Standard 1.0
Articulate the vision of their schools to all stakeholders, involve various stakeholders in reformulating the vision, and hold all stakeholders accountable to the shared vision (Educational Leadership Constituent Council, 2002, p. 4).
Ultimately, an educational leader must establish a culturally competent school by insuring that all stakeholders, especially students, are supported by the vision, policies, and practices of a school. The school should honor and celebrate its diverse cultures. For example, a principal could propose the “initiation of a “challenge” program to invite promising students to enroll in honors and Advanced Placement classes” and have a vision for the use of “high academic standards as the basis of instruction for all students” (Klotz, 2006).
# 1: “Makes the education and well-‐being of students the fundamental value of all decision making” (AASA, 2016). #2: “Fulfills all professional duties with honesty and integrity and always acts in a trustworthy and responsible manner” (AASA, 2016).
#3: “Supports the principle of due process and protects the civil and human rights of all individuals” (AASA, 2016). #4: “Implement local, state and national laws” (AASA, 2016).
A PLC with a: (1) shared and supportive leadership and (2) a shared vision (Hirsch and Hord, 2008, p. 27), relates with ELCC Standard 1.0, because, the use of PLCs could be an effective initiative to involve staff in collaboratively achieving a school’s vision.
Standard 2.0
Honor the diversity and needs of all staff and students, and ensure that instructional programs utilize effective curricular materials, pedagogy, and technology (Educational Leadership Constituent
With respect to curriculum and instruction, an educational leader must ensure that all students are provided “the same enriching, evidence-‐based educational opportunities” and culturally inclusive curriculum that encourages cultural inquiry” (Klotz, 2006). Additionally,
# 1: “Makes the education and well-‐being of students the fundamental value of all decision making” (AASA, 2016). #2: “Fulfills all professional duties with honesty and integrity and
#3: “Supports the principle of due process and protects the civil and human rights of all individuals” (AASA, 2016). #4: “Implement local, state and national laws” (AASA, 2016).
A PLC with: (3) supportive structural and relational conditions (Hirsch and Hord, 2008, p. 27), relates with ELCC Standard 2.0, because, they “operate within schools where [all] respect, positively esteem, and trust one another” (p. 27).
Council, 2002, p. 4).
teachers can be encouraged to “hold cultural sensitivity discussions with students when literary selections or references present negative stereotypes” (Klotz, 2006).
always acts in a trustworthy and responsible manner” (AASA, 2016). #9: “Maintains the standards and seeks to improve the effectiveness of the profession through research and continuing professional development” (AASA, 2016).
Standard 3.0
Manage tools and resources to optimize learning and student success by involving all staff in setting and implementing normative instructional practices (Educational Leadership Constituent Council, 2002, p. 5).
An educational leader can promote the cultural competency of his/her school by recruiting “qualified school personnel who represent the cultural and ethnic make-‐up of the communities being served” and using a “team problem-‐solving model to address student achievement or behavior problems and provide early intervention support” (Klotz, 2006).
# 1: “Makes the education and well-‐being of students the fundamental value of all decision making” (AASA, 2016). #2: “Fulfills all professional duties with honesty and integrity and always acts in a trustworthy and responsible manner” (AASA, 2016).
#3: “Supports the principle of due process and protects the civil and human rights of all individuals” (AASA, 2016). #4: “Implement local, state and national laws” (AASA, 2016).
A PLC with: (4) intentional, collegial learning, and (5) shared practice (Hirsch and Hord, 2008, p. 27), relates with ELCC Standard 3.0, because the use of PLCs is a research-based approach to organizational development focused on optimizing learning through collaboration.
Standard 4.0
Respectfully engage and collaborate with all members of the school community (Educational Leadership Constituent Council, 2002, p. 5).
In order to utilize that skill sets and life experiences of staff, an educational leader could help “match students with appropriate mentors or life coaches from similar cultural backgrounds” and “include ESL teachers …on the general education problem-‐solving team”
# 1: “Makes the education and well-‐being of students the fundamental value of all decision making” (AASA, 2016). #2: “Fulfills all professional duties with
#3: “Supports the principle of due process and protects the civil and human rights of all individuals” (AASA, 2016). #4: “Implement local, state and national laws”
A PLC with: (3) supportive structural and relational conditions (Hirsch and Hord, 2008, p. 27), relates with ELCC Standard 4.0, because, the use of PLCs can allow an educational leader to “respond to diversity of the
(Klotz, 2006). Additionally, an educational leader can honor the diversity of the school’s community by inviting parents and other community members to “share their home cultures with the school” (Klotz, 2006).
honesty and integrity and always acts in a trustworthy and responsible manner” (AASA, 2016).
(AASA, 2016).
school and the community by monitoring, adjusting, and improving school programs to meet the diverse needs of all students” (ELCC, 2002, p. 5).
Standard 5.0
Be a role model, and lead by example in respecting others and acting responsibly (Educational Leadership Constituent Council, 2002, p. 6).
To model good cultural competence, an educational leader should “ensure that all professional development opportunities [for staff] are culturally sensitive and inclusive” (Klotz, 2006). Also, an educational leader can lead by example by “acquiring basic language and communication skills in Spanish [or other languages used within the school and community] to work more effectively with…parents” (Klotz, 2006).
# 1: “Makes the education and well-‐being of students the fundamental value of all decision making” (AASA, 2016).
#2: “Fulfills all professional duties with honesty and integrity and always acts in a trustworthy and responsible manner” (AASA, 2016).
#7: “Avoids using his/her position for personal gain through political, social, religious, economic or other influences" (AASA, 2016).
#11: “Accepts responsibility and accountability for one’s own actions and behaviors” (AASA, 2016).
#12: “Commits to serving others above self" (AASA, 2016).
#3: “Supports the principle of due process and protects the civil and human rights of all individuals” (AASA, 2016).
#4: “Implement local, state and national laws” (AASA, 2016).
#8: “Accepts academic degrees or professional certification only from accredited institutions” (AASA, 2016).
#10: “Honors all contracts until fulfillment, release or dissolution mutually agreed upon by all parties” (AASA, 2016).
A PLC with: (3) supportive structural and relational conditions (Hirsch and Hord, 2008, p. 27), relates very closely with ELCC Standard 5.0, because an educational leader must “promote the success of all students by demonstrating a respect for the rights of others” (ELCC, 2002, p. 5).
Standard 6.0
Advocate for all students by leveraging political, social, economic, legal, and cultural context (Educational Leadership Constituent Council, 2002, p. 6).
It is important that an educational leader “teach all staff members the distinction between the second language acquisition process and language differences and learning disabilities” (Klotz, 2006) to ensure that students are not inappropriately being placed into special education or are limited in their access to the most rigorous and relevant instruction.
#5: “Advises the school board and implements the board’s policies and administrative rules and regulations” (AASA, 2016).
#6: “Pursues appropriate measures to correct those laws, policies, and regulations that are not consistent with sound educational goals or that are not in the best interest of children” (AASA, 2016).
A PLC with: (3) supportive structural and relational conditions (Hirsch and Hord, 2008, p. 27), relates very closely with ELCC Standard 5.0, because an educational leader must “analyze and describe the social, economic, and cultural context in a school community” (ELCC, 2002, p. 5).
Module 6: Ethics and Rights Assessment
References
AASA | American Association of School Administrators. (2016). Retrieved October 02, 2016,
from http://www.aasa.org/content.aspx?id=1390
Educational Leadership Constituent Council (2002). Standards for Educational Leaders.
Retrieved August 23, 2016 from http://soe.unc.edu/academics/requirements/
standards/NCDPI-ELCC_ Educational_Leaders_Standards.pdf
Hirsh, S., & Hord, S. M. (2008, December). Leader and Learner. Principal Leadership, 26-30.
Klotz, M. B. (2006, March). Culturally Competent Schools: Guidelines for Secondary School
Principals. Retrieved October 2, 2016, from
https://www.nasponline.org/Documents/Resources and Publications/Handouts/Families
and Educators/Culturally Competent Schools NASSP.pdf
Running Head: ADVOCATING FOR PROGRAMS AND POLICIES
Module 7: Advocating for Programs and Policies
Jeff Shaver
Angelo State University
EDG 6341 Role of the Principal
October 9, 2016
Module 7: Advocating for Programs and Policies
2
Advocating for Programs and Policies
Part I: A Walk Down Memory Lane
My interest in being an educator started when I was a sophomore in high school in South
Bend, Indiana. Throughout my life I had always excelled academically, but did not know whom
I wanted to be when I grew up or what I wanted to do with my life; I am still not totally sure.
Both of my parents, Lee Anne and Paul, were both teachers at one point during their lives, but it
took one of my high school biology teachers to tell me that “I think you would make a great
science teacher” to realize that maybe teaching was my calling. However, once I got into
college, and again was a sophomore, it took a few of my biology lab classmates to remind me,
“We think you would make a great science teacher.” So, by my junior year in college, I started
my journey to being a certified secondary science teacher.
Now that I have been an educator for the last 15 years, I reflect back on my experiences
as a student and teacher, and hope to learn from my past and present to be the best principal and
educational leader that I can. In reflecting back, one thing really bothers me, and that is high
achieving schools (like my high school alma mater) that have outstanding college-prep
programs; however, not all students at the school have equitable access to the programs.
Without having the data from 1993-1996, I can only rely on my memory, but it is clear in my
mind that half of our high school was white and the other half of the high school was not. And,
within my honors courses, there were only ever two non-white students, Tiffany and Abdul.
Tiffany and Abdul were resilient students and teenagers, because they were ‘jokingly’ tormented
Module 7: Advocating for Programs and Policies
3
by both the white and non-white students for crossing the invisible, but quite clear and present,
social and academic line between white and non-white, honors and regular.
Then, as a high school teenager, I often wondered why our school was the result of the
desegregation of schools in South Bend, but our school was segregated within. Outside of
sports, white and non-white students rarely interacted academically, and rarely socially. In fact,
during lunch break, students flocked to their corners of the school to ‘self-segregate’ based on
race and ethnicity. Being the rebel, or absent-minded teenager (who often wore khaki pants with
running shoes), I would often leave my designated corner of the school, and go check out what
everyone else was doing or talking about. Since most people knew me and liked me, I did not
create much reaction from my fellow students on the other side of the school, but my friends
from “the other side of town” would occasionally say, “Hey Shaver, what are you doing
wandering on this side of the school. Go back and join your fraternity brothers and sorority
sisters.”
In fact, one of my black friends in middle school invited me over to hang out and play
basketball after school, he lived in a poorer neighborhood (I lived directly across from our
school), but as the sun was going down he literally told me that I should “go home before the sun
goes down,” because he said that some people in the neighborhood “did not want me there” and
he was “concerned for my safety.” As a naïve kid, I did not understand why it mattered, but did
not question my friend’s request. It sounds crazy, and is slightly amusing, but this was our scene
right out of the movie “White Men Can’t Jump” (1992); and yes, I’m white and I definitely can’t
jump. In one of the scenes, Sidney Deane (Wesley Snipes) tells Billy Hoyle (Woody Harrelson),
“All I know is you better get your [expletive] north of Le Brea before sunset.” Ironically, neither
my friend or I had watched this movie until years later, but at an early age I was confronting a
Module 7: Advocating for Programs and Policies
4
confusing and changing social dynamic year after year. By the time I was in high school, most
of the non-white peers and friends of mine were no longer in any of my classes, and as I
mentioned before, the only time I really interacted with them was in athletics. To this day, I still
wonder what happened? What social and academic barriers resulted in a greater and greater gap
and division between students and friends?
So, why this walk down memory lane? Well, it is now my goal and life-long vision to
ensure that all students have access to college-prep academic and social programs that change the
landscape of a high-achieving, but inequitable schools or insure that high poverty schools can
reach high achievement through equity for all students. In fact, I think that a school should only
be designated “high achieving” if students participating within their college-prep programs,
pathways, and endorsements reflect the demographics of the school. In order to achieve this for
myself and my school, I want to commit myself to being more and more culturally competent,
sharing educational leadership with my staff and community, and putting in place necessary
tasks forces, site-based management teams, and community-based organizations so that we can
work together to make sure all students have access to equitable, rigorous, and college-prep
instructional programs.
Ultimately, we all have our internal biases and there are system and institutional biases,
so we have to protect against well-intentioned initiatives, such as college-prep and alternative
pathways (which without proper supervision and advising can become tracks) that ultimately
might have some undesired consequences. For example, as Mike Rose writes in his book Back
to School: Why Everyone Deserves a Second Chance at Education (2012), “We need to keep in
mind that the college-for-all…debate will involve not only educational and economic issues but
Module 7: Advocating for Programs and Policies
5
civic and moral ones as well” (p. 65). Therefore, I ultimately want to be part of the solution, not
part of the problem.
Part II: Advocating for a High School College Prep Course Aligned to Multiple Math Pathways
and Programs of Study
According to the Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board, Per HB 5, 83rd Texas
Legislature, Regular Session (see Guidelines Regarding the Development and Implementation of
College Preparatory Courses), “House Bill 5 requires that school districts partner with at least
one institution of higher education to develop and provide courses in college preparatory
mathematics…to prepare students for success in entry-level college course” (Texas Higher
Education Coordinating Board, 2014).
However, according to the Charles A. Dana Center at the University of Texas at Austin
(see Mathematics At The Transition: Opportunities to align high school and college mathematics
in Texas), “Developing this course has spurred conversations between school districts and
institutions of higher education across the state about what students need to learn to be prepared
for a variety of entry-level college courses” (Dana Center). More specifically, the Dana Center
states:
“TACC’s [Texas Association for Community College] Texas Success Center
[TSC] convened a task force of mathematics content experts from K–12 and
higher education to develop a framework of student learning outcomes for the
College Prep Mathematics course, which has been made available to districts
across the state as a resource. Successful completion of courses aligned to this
framework would prepare students to successfully enroll in and complete any
entry- level college mathematics course.”
Module 7: Advocating for Programs and Policies
6
Notably, the College Prep Mathematics course, based on the TSC framework of student
learning outcomes, would prepare high school seniors for multiple math pathways courses that
are aligned to different programs of study (i.e., metamajors), including quantitative reasoning
(QR), statistical reasoning (SR), or college algebra (CA). Therefore, to ensure that all of our
seniors not yet deemed college-ready are enrolled in a College Prep course that will prepare them
for success in a entry-level college course, I am advocating for a College Prep course (other than
intermediate algebra) that will give these students flexibility and preparedness for multiple
college-level courses (e.g., QR, SR, CA).
Articulating policies or laws
To support me in articulating the policies and laws, related to the College Prep math
course, I will rely on information disseminated by the Texas Success Center, the Texas
Education Coordinating Board, and the Charles A. Dana Center. I will also utilize my site-based
management (SBM) team to support me in developing, articulating, implementing, and
evaluating our College Prep math course in partnership with our institute of higher education
(IHE).
Ensuring buy-in of stakeholders
To ensure buy-in of stakeholders, I will work with our SBM team to be transparent with
our school community throughout the development, articulation, implementation, and evaluation
processes, related to our College Prep math course. And, throughout these processes, we will
hold several informational and critical feedback convening to give our school community
stakeholders a voice.
Module 7: Advocating for Programs and Policies
7
Describing the cultural context within our school to stakeholders
It will be important for our stakeholders to have information and data about the cultural
context within our school to see the advantage of a College Prep math course that prepares our
seniors for multiple college-level courses that are aligned to different higher education programs
of study, and how this model for our College Prep math course supports college and career
readiness for all our students.
Implementing change
To effectively implement our new College Prep mathematics course, we will need to
provide professional development for all our staff (especially math teachers and advisors) to
ensure that our entire school community has a shared vision for preparing our students for
multiple college-level mathematics courses, and understands the rationale for doing so.
Conflict resolution
Since a typical college prep math course would likely focus primarily on intermediate
algebra, rather than providing quantitative, statistical, and algebraic reasoning skill development,
we should be prepared to address any conflicts with our new model, and utilize the Texas
Success Center, Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board, and the Charles A. Dana Center
for recommendations on providing additional support or rationale (or data from other multiple
pathway College Prep math course successes) that we could share with our school community
stakeholders.
Module 7: Advocating for Programs and Policies
8
Reference:
Rose, M. (2012). Back to school: Why everyone deserves a second chance at education. New
York, NY: The New Press.