48
Chapter 8: Performance Assessments

Performance Assessment

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Performance Assessment

Chapter 8: Performance Assessments

Page 2: Performance Assessment

Why performance assessment?

“Relying on test items that are proxies for genuine and worthy performance challenges that try to measure performance indirectly….well, instead…we should routinely assess students’ ability to perform on complex tasks at the heart of each subject, scaffolding the task.”

Wiggins, Educative Assessment

Page 3: Performance Assessment

How could the validity of these assessments be improved?

Page 4: Performance Assessment

The teacher taught how to setup, focus, identify and draw pictures of objects on

glass slides.

As the end of the unit assessment, students labeled parts of a diagrammed microscope and answered multiple choice questions about the history of the microscope.

Page 5: Performance Assessment

What about this third grade example?

• Oral reading skills are strongly emphasized in this classroom, and a great deal of energy is spent helping students use proper phrasing, vocal expression, and clear pronunciation when they read aloud.

• The teacher uses paper-and-pencil tests that assess pupils' reading comprehension and word recognition.

Page 6: Performance Assessment

How about this health class?

• The CPR were introduced to the concept and shown a movie. An EMT came to class with a practice dummy and instructed each student on the technique.

• The end of the unit test had 25 true-false questions over all the information they had learned.

Page 7: Performance Assessment

Performance Tasks . . .

. . . generally occur over time

. . . result in tangible products or observable performances

. . . involve meaning-making

. . . encourage self-evaluation and revision

. . . require judgment to score

. . . reveal degrees of proficiency based on criteria established

and made public prior to the performance

. . . sometimes involve students working with others

-Marzano, Pickering, & McTighe

Page 8: Performance Assessment

Analyze these situations with a partner and be prepared to discuss them in 5 minutes.

Page 9: Performance Assessment

Taken from the book, A Teacher’s Guide to Performance-Based Learning and Assessment

Page 10: Performance Assessment

Purpose

• To define valued outcomes for students

• To capture students' time and attention

• To generate appropriate student learning activities

• To help students internalize the discipline’s standards

• To identify opportunities for improvement

Page 11: Performance Assessment

Let’s look at more examples…you keep tabs on commonalities

between all the following tasks

Page 12: Performance Assessment

Primary example(In view of the class, place 10 caterpillars in

a box. Place a flashlight at one end, while darkening the other by folding over the box top.) “Do caterpillars move more to the light or more to the dark? Make a graph that shows how many caterpillars move to the light and how many move to the dark part of the box. Your graphs will be displayed at Open House.”

Page 13: Performance Assessment

Elementary school

(At several specified times during the school day, students observe and count, for a set length of time, the number of cars and other vehicles going through an intersection near the school.) “The police department is considering a traffic light or a crossing guard at the intersection near your school. Your help is needed to make graphs that show how many vehicles go through that intersection at certain times of the day. Excellent graphs will be sent to the Chief of Police.”

Page 14: Performance Assessment

Middle or High School Example

• (Provide the students with a copy of a speeding ticket that shows how the fine is determined.) “How is the fine for speeding in our state determined? Make a graph that shows teenagers in our town how much it will cost them if they are caught speeding. Excellent graphs will be displayed in the Driver's Education classroom.”

Page 15: Performance Assessment

• Goal– Students will communicate

information and ideas effectively.

• Learning Objective– Students will demonstrate

the ability to write clear, concise explanation of concepts, using correct grammar, syntax, spelling and word usage.

• Activity– Write a summary report on

an article.

• Task Description– This assignment will

require you to demonstrate your ability to write clear, concise explanation of concepts, using correct grammar, syntax, spelling and word usage.

– You will select an article related to our current class topic. After reading the article, you will write a report that summarizes the major concepts of the article.

– This summary should be at least 3 pages long and should be submitted to Blackboard by Friday. Using the rubric, it will be scored based on your explanation of the concepts and the quality of your written work.

Page 16: Performance Assessment

Did you see common elements?

• Make a list of those elements

Page 17: Performance Assessment

Not new form

• Bloom called this application and synthesis

Page 18: Performance Assessment

Strengths and Limitations of Performance Assessments

Page 19: Performance Assessment
Page 20: Performance Assessment

5 Common Domains for Performance Assessment

PsychomotorSkills

Affective SkillsConcept

Acquisition

AthleticActivities

CommunicationSkills

PerformanceAssessment

Page 21: Performance Assessment

Has this ever happened to you?

Constructing Tasks….

Page 22: Performance Assessment

You have to ask yourself (and make yourself answer) questions like these!!!

• Does the task truly match the outcome(s) you're trying to measure?

• Does the task require the students to use critical thinking skills?

– Consider Bloom’s Taxonomy

• Is the task a worthwhile use of instructional time?

• Does the assessment use engaging tasks from the "real world”?

• Are the tasks fair and free from bias?

• Will the task be credible? • Is the task feasible?

• Is the task clearly defined?

Page 23: Performance Assessment

“Authenticity is essential, but authenticity alone is insufficient to

create an effective assessment task….most important, the tasks must

tell us how students are doing in relation to specific achievement

targets. Thus, assessment tasks are not instructional activities.

Wiggins, Educative Assessment.

Page 24: Performance Assessment

Is having a trial of the wolf from Little Red Riding Hood or Socrates from Plato’s Apology using sound assessment principles?

Page 25: Performance Assessment

Consider and discuss the following

Page 26: Performance Assessment

A fifth grade teacher wants to assess student understanding of the Civil War by having each student build a diorama of a key

battle.

Page 27: Performance Assessment

A second grade teacher wants to assess students’ emerging literacy by having them pick a book, read it aloud, and say if they like the book.

Page 28: Performance Assessment

A 10th grade history teacher wants to assess his Russian history unit

with a debate. A key objective was to know and explain the rise/fall of

the Communist empire, so the debate is to center on “Who Blew

it?” Students are to simulate Yeltsin, Gorbachev, Khrushchev, Stalin, Lenin, Trotsky, Catherine

the Great and Tolstory.

Page 29: Performance Assessment

Now you design a task…..

To ensure clarity, task descriptions for students should include:

• Learning target to be measured• Clear instructions• Resource materials• Format of response (e.g., oral report, written report)

And yet to come in the last part of performance assessment

• Scoring criteria

Page 30: Performance Assessment

What practices must we adopt to

achieve this kind of assessment?

Page 31: Performance Assessment

Design interactive assessments

Page 32: Performance Assessment

Use reiterative core performance tasks to measure if ability to

apply information is becoming more sophisticated

Page 33: Performance Assessment

In the light of student misconceptions, use

assessment tasks that will reveal if they have corrected

those misconceptions.

Page 34: Performance Assessment

Require student to self-evaluate their previous as well as current

work.

Page 35: Performance Assessment

• Conduct assessment along a continuum, using longitudinal rubrics, not merely task specific rubrics.

Page 36: Performance Assessment

Criteria— defines the kinds of evidence you are going to collect and makes sure it matches your

purpose

• Grading your students?

• Diagnosing student learning?

• Helping students realize the important steps in a performance or product?

• Providing concrete evidence of student work

Page 37: Performance Assessment

What is a Rubric?

• A set of explicit expectations or criteria – Description of varying levels of performance

• Systematic method of scoring student work– Increases reliability and validity of course

assessments

Page 38: Performance Assessment

Rubrics can prevent this!!!

Page 39: Performance Assessment

Criteria —specific aspects a student should perform to properly carry out the

task

• Identify the expected elements within this task

• Identify possible levels of performance – 3-5 are typical

• Craft descriptions– Exemplary work– Lower levels

Page 40: Performance Assessment

Five Reasons to Use Rubrics1. Rubrics tell students they must do a careful job. Information on the

expected quality of the task performed is given to students.

2. Rubrics set standards. Students know in advance what they have to do to achieve a certain level.

3. Rubrics clarify expectations. When levels are described in clear language, everyone knows what is required. The quality of student work will improve.

4. Rubrics help students take responsibility for their own learning. Students use rubrics to help study information the teacher values.

5. Rubrics have value to other stakeholders. Anyone (including colleagues, parents and community members) seeing a rubric and a student score based on that rubric knows what content was mastered by that student.

Page 41: Performance Assessment

Holistic or Analytical Trait Rubrics

• Holistic rubric gives a single score or rating for an entire product or performance based on an overall impression of a student’s work

• Analytical trait rubric divides a product or performance into essential traits or dimensions so that they can be judged separately—one analyzes a product or performance for essential traits

Page 42: Performance Assessment

Holistic RubricExemplary = 24 Proficient = 22 Acceptable= 20 Weak= 18 Unacceptable = 16

The presentation addresses the assigned genre. The genre is introduced with a clear definition. All characteristics of the genre and any subcategories are identified and explained. Multiple examples are used to illustrate the genre. A variety of suggestions are provided regarding use of the genre in the classroom. A bibliography 10 books from the genre is provided in correct APA format. The presentation is well- organized, well-written and visually attractive.

The presentation addresses the assigned genre. The genre is defined. Characteristics and subcategories are identified and explained. At least 2 examples of the genre are presented. At least 2 suggestions for classroom use included. A bibliography of 10 books is provided.

The presentation addresses the assigned genre. The genre is defined. Characteristics and subcategories are identified. An example of the genre is presented. A suggestion for classroom use is included. A bibliography of less than10 books is provided.

The presentation addresses the assigned genre. Characteristics or subcategories are identified. The presentation lacks examples or instructional suggestions. A partial bibliography is provided.

The presentation does not address the assigned genre. Characteristics or subcategories of the genre are not clearly identified. Examples and instructional suggestions are not included. A genre bibliography is missing.

Page 43: Performance Assessment

Analytic RubricCategory (Exemplary ) 4 (Good) 3 (Marginal) 2 (Unacceptable) 1

Quality of Information Information clearly relates to the main topic and adds new concepts, information. It includes several supporting details and/or examples. Consistently establishes source documentation for ideas.

Information clearly relates to the main topic. It provides at least 1 supporting detail or example. Occasionally provides documentation.

Information clearly relates to the main topic. No details and/or examples are given. Provides documentation when requested.

Information has little or nothing to do with the main topic or simply restates the main concept. It does not advance the discussion. Does not provide documentation for sources.

Critical Thinking Enhances the critical thinking process consistently through reflection and questioning of self and others; is a quality response that advances thoughts forward; adds to the discussion/ is a critical response.

Some critical thinking and reflection is demonstrated in discussion by the writer/responder

Responds to questions but does not engage in premise reflection

Does not respond to questions pose by the facilitator.

Collaboration Encourages and facilitates interaction among members of the online community. Reflects and evaluates own practices. Encourages colleagues to evaluate their teaching.

Responds to other members of the online community. Reflects on own practices.

Limited interactions or responses to other members of the online community.

Responds to the discussion facilitator only. No interaction with peers

Professional Language Professional vocabulary and writing style are used consistently throughout the discussion.

Professional vocabulary and writing style are used frequently throughout the discussion.

Professional vocabulary and writing style are used occasionally throughout the discussion.

Professional vocabulary and writing style are not used.

Timeliness One thread and two responses posted within time frame

One thread and one response on time. One response late

Thread or two responses late.

Thread and responses late

Page 44: Performance Assessment

Don’t let the rubric stand alone:

ALWAYS, ALWAYS

provide specific “Comments” on your rubric and/or on the student product itself.

Page 45: Performance Assessment

Generic or Task-Specific Rubrics

• Can be used across similar performances. You’d use the same rubric for judging all open-ended mathematics problems, all writing, all oral presentations, all critical thinking, or all group interaction.

• Task-specific rubrics: each one can only be used for a single task.

Page 46: Performance Assessment

Resources• Andrade, H., & Du, Y. (2005).

Student perspectives on rubric-referenced assessment. Practical Assessment, Research and Evaluation, 10, 3.

• Andrade, H. (2000). Using rubrics to promote thinking and learning. Educational Leadership, 57,5. 13-18.

• Arter, J., & McTighe, J. (2001). Scoring rubrics in the classroom. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.

• Montgomery, K. (2001). Authentic tasks and rubrics: Going beyond traditional assessments in college teaching. College Teaching, 50, 1. 34-39.

• Stevens, D. & Levi, A. (2005). Introduction to rubrics. Sterling, VA: Stylus Publishing.

Page 47: Performance Assessment

Web Resources

• Rubistar http://rubistar.4teachers.org/index.php • Teach-nology http://www.teach-nology.com/web_tools/rubrics/

• Scholastic http://www.sites4teachers.com/links/redirect.php?url=http://teacher.scholastic.com/tools/rubric.htm

• Kathy Schrock’s Guide for Educators http://school.discoveryeducation.com/schrockguide/assess.html

Page 48: Performance Assessment

Works Cited/Consulted--draft

• Airaisian, Peter W. Classroom Assessment: Concepts and Applications. McGraw Hill, 2001.

• Hibbard, Michael K, et al. A Teacher's Guide to Performance-Based Learning and Assessment. ASCD, 1996.

• Wiggins, Grant and Jay McTighe. “Tips for Developing Effective Rubrics.” Understanding by Design. ASCD,1998.

• Wiggins, Grant. Educative Assessment: Designing Assessments to Inform and Improve Student Performance. Jossey-Bass Publishers, 1998.