35
Jim Lindsey, Western Kentucky University Peer Evaluations, Peer Critiques, Custom Projects and Small Group Discussions

Peer evaluations, peer critiques and custom projects course technology computing conference

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Peer evaluations, peer critiques and custom projects   course technology computing conference

Jim Lindsey, Western Kentucky University

Peer Evaluations, Peer Critiques, Custom Projects and Small Group Discussions

Page 2: Peer evaluations, peer critiques and custom projects   course technology computing conference

Who am I?

• Jim Lindsey, Instructor• Western Kentucky University

– Computer Information Systems– Computer Information Technology– Systems Management

[email protected]

Page 3: Peer evaluations, peer critiques and custom projects   course technology computing conference

Water Dog

Page 4: Peer evaluations, peer critiques and custom projects   course technology computing conference

Today’s Agenda

• Topics– Small Group

Discussions– Custom Projects– Peer Critiques– Peer Evaluations

• Questions– What are they?– Pros– Cons– Implementation– Examples– Lessons Learned

Page 5: Peer evaluations, peer critiques and custom projects   course technology computing conference

Who are you?

• What is your name?• Name of the school/company

you represent.• What is your favorite subject

to teach? Why?• What is your least favorite

subject to teach? Why?

Page 6: Peer evaluations, peer critiques and custom projects   course technology computing conference

Small Group Discussions:What are They?

• Large classrooms• Groups of 3 or 4• Reporting back• Encouraging,

challenging, drawing others into a conversation

Page 7: Peer evaluations, peer critiques and custom projects   course technology computing conference

Small Group Discussions:Pros

• Students think critically• Students’ communication skills

improve– Practice articulating opinions– Practice debating and persuading

• Students’ presentation skills improve (via small and large group discussions)

Page 8: Peer evaluations, peer critiques and custom projects   course technology computing conference

Small Group Discussions:Pros

• Students learn from each other

• Smart, shy students are forced to participate

• Students get to know their classmates

• Students don’t get as bored during class

Page 9: Peer evaluations, peer critiques and custom projects   course technology computing conference

Small Group Discussions:Cons

• Some students don’t want to participate– Extremely shy– Sage on the stage

• Some groups do not answer questions as instructed

Page 10: Peer evaluations, peer critiques and custom projects   course technology computing conference

Small Group Discussions:Cons

• Some groups talk too much

• Some groups go down the wrong track

Page 11: Peer evaluations, peer critiques and custom projects   course technology computing conference

Small Group Discussions:Implementation

•We did this!

Page 12: Peer evaluations, peer critiques and custom projects   course technology computing conference

Small Group Discussions:Examples

•We did this!

Page 13: Peer evaluations, peer critiques and custom projects   course technology computing conference

Small Group Discussions:Lessons Learned

• Use this technique judiciously– Get/maintain attention– Hard topics?

• Compensation• Competition can be good!• Role in a flipped classroom?

Page 14: Peer evaluations, peer critiques and custom projects   course technology computing conference

Small Group Discussions:Application

• Identify one way that a teammate (not you) could implement this technique in their favorite class.

Page 15: Peer evaluations, peer critiques and custom projects   course technology computing conference

Custom Projects:What are They?

• Individualized assignments

• Same instructions• Same grading rubric

Page 16: Peer evaluations, peer critiques and custom projects   course technology computing conference

Custom Projects:Pros

• Students cannot cheat• Students can share work• High performance bar

Page 17: Peer evaluations, peer critiques and custom projects   course technology computing conference

Custom Projects:Cons

• Each students does something different

• Grading can take awhile

• Sometimes requires flexibility

Page 18: Peer evaluations, peer critiques and custom projects   course technology computing conference

Custom Projects:Implementation

• Instructions have to be clear

• Encourage/reward creativity

• Have students post their work –all of it!

Page 19: Peer evaluations, peer critiques and custom projects   course technology computing conference

Custom Projects:Examples

LinkedInTwitterWeb sitesCIT 436CIS 141

Page 20: Peer evaluations, peer critiques and custom projects   course technology computing conference

Custom Projects:Lessons Learned

• Encourage your better students to: – Finish early– Post their work for

others to see

Page 21: Peer evaluations, peer critiques and custom projects   course technology computing conference

Peer Critiques:What are They?

• Students provide feedback to peers about their performance on assignments

• Teacher provides a concise grading rubric!

Page 22: Peer evaluations, peer critiques and custom projects   course technology computing conference

Peer Critiques:Pros

• Worker gets detailed feedback from peers

• Students get practice assessing someone’s work

• Evaluators pay close attention to worker

• Everyone learns (from good and bad examples)

Page 23: Peer evaluations, peer critiques and custom projects   course technology computing conference

Peer Critiques:Cons

• Some students want teacher to do ALL evaluation

• Some students will not rate peers accurately

Page 24: Peer evaluations, peer critiques and custom projects   course technology computing conference

Peer Critiques:Implementation

• Create a concise rubric– Post the rubric early– Explain it clearly– Make students practice– Give students feedback

about their practice work– Hold everyone accountable

• Compensate Evaluators

Page 25: Peer evaluations, peer critiques and custom projects   course technology computing conference

Peer Critiques:Examples

• CIT 436 Research Papers• CIS 141 Presentation

Page 26: Peer evaluations, peer critiques and custom projects   course technology computing conference

Peer Critiques:Lessons Learned

• Communicate your expectations in the beginning!

• Provide examples• As much as possible, make

needed corrections along the way

Page 27: Peer evaluations, peer critiques and custom projects   course technology computing conference

Peer Evaluations:What are They?

• At end of a group project, students score the performance of ALL teammates

• Teacher provides a concise scoring rubric!

Page 28: Peer evaluations, peer critiques and custom projects   course technology computing conference

Peer Evaluations:Pros

• Motivates students to perform

• Students get practice assessing other people’s work

• Venting mechanism• Bragging mechanism

Page 29: Peer evaluations, peer critiques and custom projects   course technology computing conference

Peer Evaluations:Cons

• Some students want teacher to do ALL evaluation

• Some students will not rate peers accurately

Page 30: Peer evaluations, peer critiques and custom projects   course technology computing conference

Peer Evaluations:Implementation

• Create a concise rubric– Post the rubric early– Explain it clearly– Make students practice– Give students feedback

about their practice work– Hold everyone accountable

• Compensate Evaluators

Page 31: Peer evaluations, peer critiques and custom projects   course technology computing conference

Peer Evaluations:Examples

• CIS 141 Video Project

Page 32: Peer evaluations, peer critiques and custom projects   course technology computing conference

Peer Evaluations:Lessons Learned

• Communicate your expectations in the beginning!

• As much as possible, make needed corrections along the way

• Penalize lazy people

Page 33: Peer evaluations, peer critiques and custom projects   course technology computing conference

Application

• How could you include custom projects, peer critiques or peer evaluations in your favorite class?

Page 34: Peer evaluations, peer critiques and custom projects   course technology computing conference

Questions

?

Page 35: Peer evaluations, peer critiques and custom projects   course technology computing conference

PEER EVALUATIONS, PEER CRITIQUES, CUSTOM PROJECTS AND SMALL GROUP DISCUSSIONS

Jim Lindsey, Western Kentucky University