5
PLANNING EVALUATION MFOs KRAs OBJECTIVES TIMELINE Weight per KRA PERFORMANCE INDICATORS (Quality, Efficiency, Timeliness) ACTUAL RESULTS RATING SCORE Q E T AVE INSTRUCTIONAL LEADERSHIP Accounted for learning outcomes of schools and centers vis-à-vis goals and targets June 2016 – March 2017 25% Increased over all NAT performance by at least 2% from the baseline data 75% of the learners achieved 80% GSA Performed instructional supervision to achieve learning outcomes June 2016 – March 2017 Prepared/implemented and submitted 100% Monthly Supervisory Plan and Accomplishment Report Observed 5 teachers (small school)/ 7 teachers (medium school)/ 10 teachers (big school) per month Managed the processes and procedures in monitoring student achievement Every quarter Implemented 4 MPs tracking system in every grading period Name of Employee: Name of Rater: Position: Position: Division: Date of Review: Rating Period OFFICE PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (IPCRF) SCHOOL LOGO

OPCRF School Head

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: OPCRF School Head

PLANNING EVALUATION

MFOs

KRAs

OBJECTIVES

TIMELINE

Weight

per KRA

PERFORMANCE INDICATORS

(Quality, Efficiency, Timeliness)

ACTUAL RESULTS

RATING

SCORE

Q

E

T

AVE

INSTRUCTIONAL LEADERSHIP

Accounted for learning outcomes of schools and centers vis-à-vis goals and targets

June 2016 – March 2017

25%

Increased over all NAT performance by at least 2% from the baseline data 75% of the learners achieved 80% GSA

Performed instructional supervision to achieve learning outcomes

June 2016 – March 2017

Prepared/implemented and submitted 100% Monthly Supervisory Plan and Accomplishment Report Observed 5 teachers (small school)/ 7 teachers (medium school)/ 10 teachers (big school) per month

Managed the processes and procedures in monitoring student achievement

Every

quarter

Implemented 4 MPs tracking system in every grading period

Name of Employee: Name of Rater:

Position: Position:

Division: Date of Review:

Rating Period

OFFICE PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (IPCRF) SCHOOL

LOGO

Page 2: OPCRF School Head

PLANNING EVALUATION

MFOs

KRAs

OBJECTIVES

TIMELINE

Weight

per KRA

PERFORMANCE INDICATORS

(Quality, Efficiency, Timeliness)

ACTUAL RESULTS

RATING

SCORE

Q

E

T

AVE

Provided coaching/mentoring to improve teaching-learning performance

June 2016 – March 2017

Conducted coaching/mentoring sessions to 5 teachers (small school)/ 7 teachers (medium school)/ 10 teachers (big school) per month

LEARNING ENVIRONMENT

Provided safe and child friendly learning school environment for students/ learners

June 2016 – March 2017

15%

100% accomplished on the following: Implemented Child Protection mechanism and processes (DepEd Order No. 405, s. 2012) for SY 2016 – 2017 Implemented clear Disaster Risk Reduction Mobilization Plan Maintained conducive physical learning environment for SY 2016 – 2017 Provided facilities as learning support system for SY 2016 – 2017

HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT AND DEVELOPMENT

Sustained the conduct of NCBTS TSNA, analyzed result and designed/ implemented

May 2016

20%

Conducted NCBTS-TSNA and analyzed 100% results prior to the start of the school year

Page 3: OPCRF School Head

PLANNING EVALUATION

MFOs

KRAs

OBJECTIVES

TIMELINE

Weight

per KRA

PERFORMANCE INDICATORS

(Quality, Efficiency, Timeliness)

ACTUAL RESULTS

RATING

SCORE

Q

E

T

AVE

intervention program to address development needs of personnel.

Organized/ conducted In-Service training

June 2016 – March 2017

Conducted two (2) In-Service Trainings to teachers and non-teaching personnel within RPMS cycle

Recommended and facilitated the hiring/ promotion/ approved ERF/reclassification of teachers and personnel

June 2016 – March 2017

Facilitated hiring/ promotion/ reclassification of teacher/s

Provide technical assistance to teachers on matters pertaining to the enhancement of classroom management, skills and instructional competence and to non-teaching personnel for support services within the RPMS cycle

June 2016 – March 2017

Provided technical assistance to 5 teachers (Sm)/ 7 teachers (M)/ 10 teachers (B) to enhance their classroom and instructional competence per month.

Attended relevant trainings/ seminars/ and workshops for school heads/ school administrators and sent teachers to relevant trainings/ workshops for teachers

June 2016 – March 2017

Attended 75% of the required training/ seminar/ workshop within RPMS cycle Sent 75% of teachers to required trainings/ seminars/ workshops within RPMS cycle

PARENTS’ INVOLVEMENT AND COMMUNITY PARTNERSHIP

Established school, family, and community partnership for school performance

June 2016 – March 2017

15%

Conducted 2 General Assembly meetings with 75% parents’ attendance and to advocate school

Page 4: OPCRF School Head

PLANNING EVALUATION

MFOs

KRAs

OBJECTIVES

TIMELINE

Weight

per KRA

PERFORMANCE INDICATORS

(Quality, Efficiency, Timeliness)

ACTUAL RESULTS

RATING

SCORE

Q

E

T

AVE

programs and projects within the School Year

Generated resources for school improvement/ facilities/ equipment from stakeholders and donors with in the school year.

June 2016 – March 2017

Initiated one (1) program or project aligned with AIP from stakeholders within RPMS cycle

Awarded and recognized benevolent stakeholders at the end of the school year

April 2017

Awarded and recognized deserving stakeholders on Recognition Day

SCHOOL LEADERSHIP, MANAGEMENT AND OPERATIONS

Initiated and has in placed School Improvement Plan developed collaboratively by the stakeholders of the school and the community

June 2016 – March 2017

25%

Performed data based strategic planning and prioritized programs/projects that appropriately address varying needs of school within the calendar year Conducted regular review of SIP

Organized/implemented clear structures and work arrangements that promotes shared leadership and governance and defines the roles and responsibilities of the various stakeholders

June 2016 – March 2017

Organized functional Project Teams/ School Working Committee/s with clear term of references to support implementation of programs/projects

Performed school leadership, management and operations functions

June 2016 – March 2017

Implemented functional leadership management and operational human and material resource mobilization and utilization

Page 5: OPCRF School Head

PLANNING EVALUATION

MFOs

KRAs

OBJECTIVES

TIMELINE

Weight

per KRA

PERFORMANCE INDICATORS

(Quality, Efficiency, Timeliness)

ACTUAL RESULTS

RATING

SCORE

Q

E

T

AVE

aligned with SIP to improve school performance in a school year. 100% utilization of MOOE and timely submission of financial report

OVERALL RATING FOR

ACCOMPLISHMENT

_________________________ ___________________________ ______________________________ Rater Ratee Approving Authority