70
On the Validity of Peer Grading and a Cloud Teaching Assistant System Tim Vogelsang - March 2015 Lara Ruppertz Paper (ACM): http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2723576.2723633

On the Validity of Peer Grading and a Cloud Teaching Assistant System

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

On the Validity of Peer Grading

and a Cloud Teaching Assistant

SystemTim Vogelsang - March 2015

Lara Ruppertz

Paper (ACM): http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2723576.2723633

On the Validity of Peer Grading

and a Cloud Teaching Assistant

SystemTim Vogelsang - March 2015

Lara Ruppertz

Paper (ACM): http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2723576.2723633

Q3: How do students’ performances and the grading types differ

amend different scoring criteria?

Q4: How valid are CTAS and peer grading?

MOOCINTRODUCTION

“MOOC, every letter is negotiable“ by Mathieu Plourde is licensed under CC-BY.

TeamINTRODUCTION

4

TeamINTRODUCTION

5

TeamINTRODUCTION

6

On The Validity of Peer

Grading and a Cloud Teaching

Assistant System

On The Validity of Peer

Grading and a Cloud Teaching

Assistant System

Peer GradingINTRODUCTION

Peer GradingINTRODUCTION

Peer GradingINTRODUCTION

Peer GradingINTRODUCTION

11

Peer Grading SystemsRELATED WORK

Peer Grading SystemsRELATED WORK

SWoRD

Peer Grader

On The Validity of Peer Grading and a

Cloud Teaching Assistant

System

On The Validity of Peer Grading and a

Cloud Teaching Assistant

System

Cloud Teaching Assistants (CTAs)METHODS

Platform

Cloud Teaching Assistants (CTAs)METHODS

Platform

Cloud Teaching Assistants (CTAs)METHODS

Platform

Cloud Teaching Assistants (CTAs)METHODS

Platform

Cloud Teaching Assistants (CTAs)METHODS

Platform

On The Validity of Peer

Grading and a Cloud Teaching

Assistant System

On The Validity of Peer

Grading and a Cloud Teaching

Assistant System

Reliability and ValidityMETHODS

„Validity & Reliability“ by Nevit Dilmen is licensed under CC BY-SA 3.0.

Reliability and ValidityMETHODS

„Validity & Reliability“ by Nevit Dilmen is licensed under CC BY-SA 3.0.

Reliability and ValidityINTRODUCTION

Assignment

Reliability and ValidityINTRODUCTION

Few Profs

Assignment

Reliability and ValidityINTRODUCTION

Many Peers

Few Profs

Assignment

Reliability and ValidityINTRODUCTION

Many Peers Some CTAs

Few Profs

Assignment

Reliability and ValidityINTRODUCTION

Many Peers Some CTAs

Few Profs

Assignment

Compute Reliability

Reliability and ValidityINTRODUCTION

Many Peers Some CTAs

Few Profs

Assignment

Compute Reliability

Reliability and ValidityINTRODUCTION

Many Peers Some CTAs

Few Profs

Assignment

Compute Reliability

Reliability and ValidityINTRODUCTION

Many Peers Some CTAs

Few Profs

Compute Validity

Assignment

Compute Reliability

On The Validity of Peer

Grading and a Cloud Teaching

Assistant System

Experiment Setup & Methods

Course: Public PrivacyEXPERIMENT SETUP

Source: 11 pt, regular32

Professor: Anja MihrEXPERIMENT SETUP

Screenshot taken from iversity.org platform. Image courtesy Anja Mihr.

Sample SizeEXPERIMENT SETUP

Many Peers Some CTAs

Few Profs

Compute Validity

Compute Reliability

Final Exam

Many Peers Some CTAs

Few Profs

Compute Validity

Compute Reliability

- 25 paid exam participants

- 16 multiple choice questions

- 476 exam participants

- 4620 active students- 30k enrolments

- 1 essay question

Sample Size

Final Exam

EXPERIMENT SETUP

Many Peers (476) Some CTAs (4)

Few Profs (1)

Final Exam

Compute Validity

Compute Reliability

- 25 paid exam participants

- 16 multiple choice questions

- 476 exam participants

- 4620 active students- 30k enrolments

- 1 essay question

25

Sample SizeEXPERIMENT SETUP

Final ExamEXPERIMENT SETUP

Screenshot taken from iversity.org platform. Image courtesy Anja Mihr.

Source: 11 pt, regular37

Grading RubricsEXPERIMENT SETUP

THESIS / CENTRAL IDEA

Grading RubricsEXPERIMENT SETUP

I

THESIS / CENTRAL IDEA

ORGANISATION

Grading RubricsEXPERIMENT SETUP

I

II

THESIS / CENTRAL IDEA

ORGANISATION

CONTENT

Grading RubricsEXPERIMENT SETUP

I

II

III

THESIS / CENTRAL IDEA

ORGANISATION

CONTENT

BALANCED ARGUMENTATION

Grading RubricsEXPERIMENT SETUP

I

II

III

IV

I

II

III

IV

V

THESIS / CENTRAL IDEA

ORGANISATION

CONTENT

BALANCED ARGUMENTATION

SOURCES

Grading RubricsEXPERIMENT SETUP

Q3: How do students’ performances and the grading types differ

amend different scoring criteria?

Q4: How valid are CTAS and peer grading?

Research QuestionsMETHODS

Q1: How are grades given by peers, the CTAs and the instructor

distributed?

Q3: How does the grading differ between the grading rubrics?

Q4: How valid are CTAS and peer grading?

Research QuestionsMETHODS

Q1: How are grades given by peers, the CTAs and the instructor

distributed?

Q2: How does the grading vary among the grading rubrics?

Q4: How valid are CTAS and peer grading?

Research QuestionsMETHODS

Q1: How are grades given by peers, the CTAs and the professor

distributed?

Q2: How does the grading vary among the grading rubrics?

Q3: How valid are peer and CTA grading?

Research QuestionsMETHODS

On The Validity of Peer

Grading and a Cloud Teaching

Assistant System

Result

s

Q1: How are grades given by peers, the CTAs and

the professor distributed?

RESULTS

Histogram of grades given by peers, CTAs and

professor

Range: 0 (worst grade) - 4 (best grade)

Grade

CTAs

Peers

Professor

How are grades distributed?

Q2: How does the grading

vary among the grading rubrics?

RESULTS

Thesis Organisation Content Argumentation Sources

Histogram of grades given by peers, CTAs and professor.

Range: 0 (worst grade) - 4 (best grade).

Distinguished by grading rubrics.

CTAs

Peers

Professor

Grade

How does the grading vary among the rubrics?

52

RESULTS

Average grade assigned by peers, CTAs and professor to a specific criterion.

Range: 0 (worst grade) - 4 (best grade).

Peers CTAs Professor

How does the grading vary among the rubrics?

53

Q3: How valid are peer and CTA grading?

Many Peers (476) Some CTAs (4)

Few Profs (1)

Final Exam

Compute Validity

Compute Reliability

- 25 paid exam participants

- 16 multiple choice questions

- 476 exam participants

- 4620 active students- 30k enrolments

- 1 essay question

25

RESULTS

How valid are peer and CTA grading?

RESULTS

How valid are peer and CTA grading?

Correlation matrix using Pearson’s correlation.

375 data points: (25 exams) x (5 criteria) x (3 grading groups).

RESULTS

Scatterplot : One dot represents one

final exam graded by peers, CTAs

and professor.

Range: 0 (worst grade) - 4 (best grade)

Average CTA Grade

How valid are peer and CTA grading?

RESULTS

How valid are peer and CTA grading?

Correlation matrix using Pearson’s correlation.

375 data points: (25 exams) x (5 criteria) x (3 grading groups).

RESULTS

How valid are peer and CTA grading?

Peers CTAs Prof.

Peers

CTAs

Prof.

Correlation matrix using Pearson’s correlation.

375 data points: (25 exams) x (5 criteria) x (3 grading groups).

Many Peers (476) Some CTAs (4)

Few Profs (1)

Final Exam

Compute Validity

Compute Reliability

- 25 paid exam participants

- 16 multiple choice questions

- 476 exam participants

- 4620 active students- 30k enrolments

- 1 essay question

25

RESULTS

How valid are peer and CTA grading?

TheCooperReview.com.Image courtesy: Sarah Cooper.61

DISCUSSION

Hypotheses / Future Work

Repeat Experiment Adjust Experiment

62

Hypotheses / Future WorkDISCUSSION

Repeat Experiment Adjust Experiment

Disagreement on

‚argumentation‘?

63

Hypotheses / Future WorkDISCUSSION

Repeat Experiment Adjust Experiment

Disagreement on

‚argumentation‘?

Peer’s bias?

64

Hypotheses / Future WorkDISCUSSION

Repeat Experiment Adjust Experiment

Disagreement on

‚argumentation‘?

Peer’s bias?

Advanced CTA

selection process.

65

Hypotheses / Future WorkDISCUSSION

Repeat Experiment Adjust Experiment

Disagreement on

‚argumentation‘?

Peer’s bias?

Advanced CTA

selection process.

Peer calibration

process.

66

How to define

validity in the

context of massive

grading?

Hypotheses / Future WorkDISCUSSION

Repeat Experiment Adjust Experiment

Disagreement on

‚argumentation‘?

Peer’s bias?

Advanced CTA

selection process.

Peer calibration

process.

67

Disagreement on

‚argumentation‘?

Peer’s bias?

Advanced CTA

selection process.

Peer calibration

process.

How to define

validity in the

context of massive

grading?

How to design a valid grading

process including professor,

peers and CTAs?

Hypotheses / Future WorkDISCUSSION

Repeat Experiment Adjust Experiment

68

Hypotheses / Future WorkDISCUSSION

69