Upload
roverdust
View
1.027
Download
2
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
3/29/2012 WKCE Advanced comparisons
Citation preview
NAEP estimated equivalency 2011 WKCE
Internal report
We are now entering a new phase of accountability that will be tied
to NAEP scores.
The rules have changed. This is not just a tweaking; the
change is huge!
If the currently discussed estimates of NAEP cut scores hold,
the old proficient category is now only basic and only the old advanced category will be proficient or advanced.
The bar has been raised significantly.
Basketball analogy:
under the old WKCE system we were shooting at a 5 foot kids
height basket (many could dunk)
under the NAEP equivalency that basket has been raised up to 10
feet (only a few can dunk).
No matter how this will be explained, the bottom-line is that
the expectations on our system have now been increased to even higher
levels.
The improvement model will be very important as we will be graded on
progress also.
The NAEP equivalent scores will most likely mirror the advanced category of the WKCE
(latest word from DPI)
Data is from fall 2011 and will be used on school report cards to give our five school entities a school grade between 0 and 100
How these WKCE scores will translate into that specific grade is unknown
We did very well under the old system – we were bouncing up
toward 90% proficient and advanced. Staff and Students need to be congratulated for that success.
Now, we need to adjust to the reality of the new levels and the associated
goals and ratings.
Goal One:
Above 50% proficient (on NAEP scale) in Reading and Math across
all grades
With the NAEP reset, we have a lot of work to do
Advanced Reading (PdC blue State red)
Grade 3 Grade 4 Grade 5 Grade 6 Grade 7 Grade 8 Grade 1020
25
30
35
40
45
50
55
60
34
40
37
59
41 41
54
4443
38
45
49
40
49
Advanced Math (PdC blue State red)
Grade 3 Grade 4 Grade 5 Grade 6 Grade 7 Grade 8 Grade 1020
25
30
35
40
45
50
55
60
29
37
49
35 35
27
31
38
41
48
3837
31
25
Goal Two:
Above State Average in Reading and Math across all grades
With the NAEP reset, we have a lot of work to do
PdC vs State in Reading
Grade 3 Grade 4 Grade 5 Grade 6 Grade 7 Grade 8 Grade 10
-15
-10
-5
0
5
10
15
20
-10
-3
-1
14
-8
1
5
Future is Bright
PdC vs State in Math
Grade 3 Grade 4 Grade 5 Grade 6 Grade 7 Grade 8 Grade 10
-10
-5
0
5
10
15
-9
-4
1
-3
-2
-4
6
Future is Bright
One way to see where we are now is to compare with schools in our
region.
The following slides outline the advanced percentages for all the
schools in CESA 3.
“Stretch” Goal Three:
Top in CESA 3 in Reading and Math across all grades
With the NAEP reset, we have a lot of work to do
Grade 10 Math rank 7 in CESA
Seneca
Belmont C
ommunity
Benton
Wau
zeka-S
teuben
Southwest
ern W
isconsin
Barnev
eld
West
on
Highlan
d
Shullsb
urg
Black H
awk
Riverd
ale
Kickap
oo Area
Boscobel
Area
Richlan
d
Iowa-Gran
t
Cuba City
Cassvil
le
Fennim
ore Community
Pecatonica
AreaPotosi
Argyle
Darlingto
n Community
Lancas
ter Community
Mineral P
oint Unified
Prairie
du Chien Area
Ithaca
North Craw
ford
Dodgevil
le
River V
alley
River R
idge
Plattev
ille0.00%
10.00%
20.00%
30.00%
40.00%
50.00%
60.00%
70.00%
80.00%
90.00%
100.00%
31.20%
Grade 8 Math rank 21 in CESA
Seneca
Shullsb
urg
North Craw
ford
Southwest
ern W
isconsin
Riverd
ale
Belmont C
ommunity
Boscobel
Area
Black H
awk
Fennim
ore Community
Mineral P
oint Unified
Prairie
du Chien Area
Lancas
ter Community
Iowa-Gran
t
Barnev
eld
Cassvil
le
Highlan
dIth
aca
Richlan
dArgy
le
Benton
River V
alley
Cuba City
River R
idge
Pecatonica
Area
Dodgevil
le
West
onPotosi
Wau
zeka-S
teuben
Darlingto
n Community
Kickap
oo Area
Plattev
ille0.00%
10.00%
20.00%
30.00%
40.00%
50.00%
60.00%
70.00%
80.00%
90.00%
100.00%
27.20%
Grade 7 Math rank 15 in CESA
Boscobel
Area
Belmont C
ommunity
West
on
Wau
zeka-S
teuben
Riverd
ale
Seneca
Black H
awk
Southwest
ern W
isconsin
Highlan
dArgy
le
Cassvil
le
Kickap
oo Area
Fennim
ore Community
Lancas
ter Community
Richlan
d
North Craw
ford
Prairie
du Chien Area
Barnev
eld
Shullsb
urg
Mineral P
oint Unified
Benton
Ithaca
Pecatonica
Area
River R
idge
Dodgevil
le
River V
alley
Iowa-Gran
t
Cuba City
Potosi
Plattev
ille
Darlingto
n Community0.00%
10.00%
20.00%
30.00%
40.00%
50.00%
60.00%
70.00%
80.00%
90.00%
100.00%
35.20%
Grade 6 Math rank 16 in CESA
Shullsb
urg
Boscobel
Area
Highlan
d
Southwest
ern W
isconsin
Seneca
Black H
awk
Mineral P
oint Unified
Argyle
Lancas
ter Community
Fennim
ore Community
Cuba City
Kickap
oo Area
West
onPotosi
Ithaca
Prairie
du Chien Area
Riverd
ale
Barnev
eld
Wau
zeka-S
teuben
Richlan
d
Pecatonica
Area
North Craw
ford
Darlingto
n Community
Dodgevil
le
Iowa-Gran
t
Benton
River V
alley
Belmont C
ommunity
River R
idge
Plattev
ille
Cassvil
le0.00%
10.00%
20.00%
30.00%
40.00%
50.00%
60.00%
70.00%
80.00%
90.00%
100.00%
35.20%
Grade 5 Math rank 14 in CESA
Boscobel
Area
Highlan
d
Southwest
ern W
isconsin
Ithaca
North Craw
ford
Riverd
ale
River R
idge
Wau
zeka-S
teuben
Kickap
oo AreaPotosi
Cassvil
le
Fennim
ore Community
Shullsb
urg
Black H
awkArgy
le
Richlan
d
Lancas
ter Community
Prairie
du Chien Area
Pecatonica
Area
Mineral P
oint Unified
Darlingto
n Community
Seneca
Belmont C
ommunity
Cuba City
Barnev
eld
Dodgevil
le
West
on
Iowa-Gran
t
River V
alley
Plattev
ille
Benton
0.00%
10.00%
20.00%
30.00%
40.00%
50.00%
60.00%
70.00%
80.00%
90.00%
100.00%
48.60%
Grade 4 Math rank 20 in CESA
Boscobel
Area
Seneca
Ithaca
Wau
zeka-S
teuben
Argyle
Southwest
ern W
isconsin
Belmont C
ommunity
Mineral P
oint Unified
Potosi
North Craw
ford
Iowa-Gran
t
Prairie
du Chien Area
Highlan
d
Shullsb
urg
West
on
Lancas
ter Community
Black H
awk
River R
idge
Cuba City
Riverd
ale
Richlan
d
Kickap
oo Area
Fennim
ore Community
Cassvil
le
Barnev
eld
Dodgevil
le
Pecatonica
Area
Darlingto
n Community
Plattev
ille
River V
alley
Benton
0.00%
10.00%
20.00%
30.00%
40.00%
50.00%
60.00%
70.00%
80.00%
90.00%
100.00%
37.10%
Grade 3 Math rank 20 in CESA
Riverd
ale
West
on
North Craw
fordArgy
le
Southwest
ern W
isconsin
Darlingto
n Community
Highlan
d
Seneca
Kickap
oo Area
Wau
zeka-S
teuben
Shullsb
urg
Prairie
du Chien Area
Richlan
d
Boscobel
Area
Lancas
ter Community
Mineral P
oint Unified
Pecatonica
Area
River R
idgeIth
aca
Iowa-Gran
t
Fennim
ore Community
Barnev
eld
Cassvil
le
Belmont C
ommunity
Benton
River V
alley
Dodgevil
le
Cuba City
Plattev
ille
Black H
awkPotosi
0.00%
10.00%
20.00%
30.00%
40.00%
50.00%
60.00%
70.00%
80.00%
90.00%
100.00%
28.60%
Grade 10 Reading rank 9 in CESA
Pecatonica
Area
Wau
zeka-S
teuben
Southwest
ern W
isconsin
Shullsb
urg
Black H
awk
Boscobel
Area
Darlingto
n Community
Iowa-Gran
t
Highlan
d
West
on
Kickap
oo Area
Lancas
ter Community
Riverd
ale
Cuba City
Belmont C
ommunity
Cassvil
le
Richlan
d
Seneca
River R
idge
Mineral P
oint Unified
Barnev
eld
Dodgevil
le
Prairie
du Chien Area
Fennim
ore Community
North Craw
fordPotosi
River V
alley
Argyle
Benton
Plattev
illeIth
aca0.00%
10.00%
20.00%
30.00%
40.00%
50.00%
60.00%
70.00%
80.00%
90.00%
100.00%
53.80%
Grade 8 Reading rank 16 in CESA
Black H
awk
Boscobel
Area
Seneca
Barnev
eld
Benton
Belmont C
ommunity
West
on
Pecatonica
Area
Shullsb
urg
Fennim
ore Community
Mineral P
oint Unified
Lancas
ter Community
Southwest
ern W
isconsin
PotosiIth
aca
Prairie
du Chien Area
River R
idge
Cuba City
North Craw
ford
River V
alley
Darlingto
n Community
Richlan
d
Dodgevil
le
Kickap
oo Area
Plattev
ille
Iowa-Gran
t
Cassvil
le
Riverd
aleArgy
le
Wau
zeka-S
teuben
Highlan
d0.00%
10.00%
20.00%
30.00%
40.00%
50.00%
60.00%
70.00%
80.00%
90.00%
100.00%
40.70%
Grade 7 Reading rank 25 in CESA
Boscobel
Area
Seneca
Kickap
oo AreaIth
aca
West
on
Riverd
ale
Prairie
du Chien Area
Lancas
ter Community
Belmont C
ommunity
Black H
awk
Shullsb
urg
Richlan
d
Wau
zeka-S
teuben
Cassvil
le
Fennim
ore Community
Pecatonica
AreaPotosi
North Craw
ford
Southwest
ern W
isconsin
River R
idge
River V
alley
Argyle
Cuba City
Highlan
d
Mineral P
oint Unified
Darlingto
n Community
Dodgevil
le
Iowa-Gran
t
Barnev
eld
Plattev
ille
Benton
0.00%
10.00%
20.00%
30.00%
40.00%
50.00%
60.00%
70.00%
80.00%
90.00%
100.00%
40.70%
Grade 6 Reading rank 9 in CESA
Shullsb
urg
Pecatonica
Area
Seneca
Cuba City
West
onIth
acaPotosi
Richlan
d
Lancas
ter Community
Highlan
d
Boscobel
Area
Barnev
eld
Riverd
ale
Kickap
oo Area
Darlingto
n Community
Black H
awk
Wau
zeka-S
teuben
Iowa-Gran
t
River R
idge
Dodgevil
le
Mineral P
oint Unified
Fennim
ore Community
Prairie
du Chien Area
North Craw
ford
Southwest
ern W
isconsin
River V
alley
Plattev
illeArgy
le
Cassvil
le
Benton
Belmont C
ommunity0.00%
10.00%
20.00%
30.00%
40.00%
50.00%
60.00%
70.00%
80.00%
90.00%
100.00%
59.30%
Grade 5 Reading rank 18 in CESA
Riverd
ale
Belmont C
ommunityIth
aca
Boscobel
Area
Seneca
Wau
zeka-S
teuben
Richlan
d
River R
idge
Cuba City
North Craw
fordArgy
le
Kickap
oo Area
Southwest
ern W
isconsin
Prairie
du Chien Area
Barnev
eld
Pecatonica
Area
Iowa-Gran
t
West
on
Darlingto
n Community
Shullsb
urg
Highlan
d
Cassvil
le
Lancas
ter Community
River V
alley
Fennim
ore Community
Plattev
illePotosi
Black H
awk
Mineral P
oint Unified
Dodgevil
le
Benton
0.00%
10.00%
20.00%
30.00%
40.00%
50.00%
60.00%
70.00%
80.00%
90.00%
100.00%
36.50%
Grade 4 Reading rank 21 in CESA
Boscobel
Area
Seneca
Potosi
Mineral P
oint Unified
Wau
zeka-S
teuben
Argyle
Iowa-Gran
t
Highlan
d
Kickap
oo Area
Pecatonica
Area
Prairie
du Chien Area
Fennim
ore Community
Southwest
ern W
isconsin
West
on
Darlingto
n Community
Richlan
d
Riverd
ale
Belmont C
ommunityIth
aca
Barnev
eld
North Craw
ford
Cuba City
Dodgevil
le
Lancas
ter Community
Plattev
ille
Cassvil
le
Shullsb
urg
River R
idge
River V
alley
Black H
awk
Benton
0.00%
10.00%
20.00%
30.00%
40.00%
50.00%
60.00%
70.00%
80.00%
90.00%
100.00%
40.30%
Grade 3 Reading rank 26 in CESA
Riverd
ale
Richlan
d
Highlan
d
North Craw
ford
Lancas
ter Community
Prairie
du Chien Area
Southwest
ern W
isconsin
Wau
zeka-S
teuben
Pecatonica
Area
Kickap
oo Area
Boscobel
Area
Mineral P
oint Unified
Cassvil
le
Darlingto
n Community
Iowa-Gran
t
Argyle
Shullsb
urg
Plattev
ille
West
on
Barnev
eld
Dodgevil
le
Cuba City
PotosiIth
aca
River V
alley
Fennim
ore Community
River R
idge
Belmont C
ommunity
Benton
Seneca
Black H
awk
0.00%
10.00%
20.00%
30.00%
40.00%
50.00%
60.00%
70.00%
80.00%
90.00%
100.00%
34.30%
How the school grading system will work is unknown.
To estimate where we fall compared to the other CESA
Schools, the following slides give an approximate percentile (grade?)
by the percent of schools scoring lower than our scores.
ABCD F
MATH by Grade: percentile rank in CESA 3
Grade 3 Grade 4 Grade 5 Grade 6 Grade 7 Grade 8 Grade 100%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
35% 35%
55%
48%52%
32%
77%
The school score/grade is the scary part of all of this – will the media report it something like this??
READING by Grade: percentile rank in CESA 3
Grade 3 Grade 4 Grade 5 Grade 6 Grade 7 Grade 8 Grade 100%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
16%
32%
42%
71%
19%
48%
71%
Where do we go from here?
• 4K Data looks great – future is bright. • BAK MAP scores are looking good, especially on
the reading side – future is bright. (Once we get the final cut scores we can extrapolate that MAP data to those same levels.)
• BAK and BV Elementary Teachers are currently discussing the efficacy of a different math program – future is bright.
• PLC up through grade 4 in place, and with the additional staff planned we will have the RtI continuum all through PK to 4 – future is bright.
Where do we go from here?• MS and JH STEM Teachers are exploring math
and science upgrades – future is bright. • Given the higher levels coming into the middle
grades, a review of the ELA curriculum is in order – future is bright.
• High School discussions are on-going about significant Humanities upgrades for 13-14 – future is bright.
• 4 more AP classes to be added in 12-13 – future is bright.
End with the PositivesCelebrate Academic Achievements
Math• The High School leads the way as the students
(grade 10 test) tested 6 points over the state average and rank 7th in the CESA
• Nice continued progress in grades 3 through 8 (future is bright) as only a handful of kids moving up will get most grades well above state averages
End with the PositivesCelebrate Academic Achievements
English Language Arts (Reading)• Grade 6 takes high honors as the students
tested 14 points over the state average and tied with the high school ranking 9th in the CESA
• Nice linear growth upward coming out of the elementary grades (future is bright)
This is meant only to be internal data for the purposes of reflection and planning as the final NAEP cut
scores have not been released