14
Making OER Dynamic: Platform and Meta-tagging Considerations in Michigan November 3, 2016 http:// bit.ly/2dDf4Sp flickr Welcome by Michael Pardo is licensed under CC0 1.0

Making OER Dynamic: Platform and Meta-tagging Considerations in Michigan

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 4: Making OER Dynamic: Platform and Meta-tagging Considerations in Michigan

StockPhoto

s!

Page 5: Making OER Dynamic: Platform and Meta-tagging Considerations in Michigan

Michigan Commitment to #GoOpen

• Adopt/implement a statewide technology strategy with OERs

• Develop and maintain a statewide repository solution for openly licensed resources • Wish list: “marketplace” to access state content, ISD content,

district content, and educators’ personal content

Page 7: Making OER Dynamic: Platform and Meta-tagging Considerations in Michigan

Platform Wish List

• Platform can hold repositories/hubs at different levels• Michigan > Educational Service Agency > District > School

• Vetting “ribbons” from different organizations• Rating system for OERs• Comments section • Other resource suggestions, i.e., Amazon Marketplace• Back end communication with other state OER repositories

via Learning Registry

Page 8: Making OER Dynamic: Platform and Meta-tagging Considerations in Michigan

Meta-tagging Considerations

• Michigan State Standards• Cross-cutting concepts• Science and engineering practices

• Grade and grade band• Subject • Topic• Standards Mapping• Michigan state standards mapped to other state standards through

the Learning Registry (USDOE aggregator)?• i.e., another state OER is 75% aligned to the

Page 9: Making OER Dynamic: Platform and Meta-tagging Considerations in Michigan

flickr Teaching Open Source Practices, Version 4.0 by opensource.com is licensed under CC-BY-SA 2.0

• Shift from whole text-like chunks to learning objects for increased flexibility

• Focus on learning objects

• Framework or guidance for educators’ inclusion of OERs in “telling your story” for student teaching and learning outcomes

Page 11: Making OER Dynamic: Platform and Meta-tagging Considerations in Michigan

What’s Coming Next?

• Setting a State OER Vision• Stakeholder Inclusion • Stakeholder identification• Communication

• Formation of cross-organization workgroups (some overlapping)• Communications/Marketing• Systems/Platform• Vetting• Resource Mapping/Framing• Professional Development• Content acquisition, curation

Page 12: Making OER Dynamic: Platform and Meta-tagging Considerations in Michigan

Underway

• Integration with State Ed Tech Plan (MI Roadmap: Transforming Education through Technology) – inclusion in teaching, learning, leadership, assessment, infrastructure

• Identifying intersections with Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA) Title IV Part A

Page 14: Making OER Dynamic: Platform and Meta-tagging Considerations in Michigan

Contact Ann-Marie MapesOffice of Education Improvement and InnovationMichigan Department of [email protected] Jared Robinson Office of Educator TalentMichigan Department of [email protected]

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.