46

Is Development a Science? – The Case of the Mumbai Slum

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Is Development a Science? – The Case of the Mumbai Slum
Page 2: Is Development a Science? – The Case of the Mumbai Slum
Page 3: Is Development a Science? – The Case of the Mumbai Slum

what do we mean when

we say a certain model

for slum development

‘works’?

Page 4: Is Development a Science? – The Case of the Mumbai Slum

practice

outcome

expert’s theory

practice

outcome

Page 5: Is Development a Science? – The Case of the Mumbai Slum

1. titling + property rights

2. microfinance

3. architectural theory +

development

Page 6: Is Development a Science? – The Case of the Mumbai Slum

1985 Slum Upgrading Programme

(SUP) - Bombay Urban Development

Project (BUDP)

2005 Jawaharlal Nehru National

Urban Renewal Mission (JnNURM)

2011 Proposed Draft Model of

Property Rights to Slum-Dwellers Act

2013 Rajiv Awas Yojana (RAY)

Scheme

1. titling

Page 7: Is Development a Science? – The Case of the Mumbai Slum

title

confidence

investment

economic growth

trackable

tax

infrastructure

poverty alleviation

Page 8: Is Development a Science? – The Case of the Mumbai Slum
Page 9: Is Development a Science? – The Case of the Mumbai Slum

vision 1

no tenure = no order

chaos

vision 2

entrepreneurs

unleash the market!

Page 10: Is Development a Science? – The Case of the Mumbai Slum
Page 11: Is Development a Science? – The Case of the Mumbai Slum

property

owner

familyneighbors

policeencroachers

Page 12: Is Development a Science? – The Case of the Mumbai Slum

Slum Rehabilitation

Authority (SRA)

1. property rights

Page 13: Is Development a Science? – The Case of the Mumbai Slum

rehabilitation commercia

l

Page 14: Is Development a Science? – The Case of the Mumbai Slum
Page 15: Is Development a Science? – The Case of the Mumbai Slum

land

contestation

ruler ruler

owner owner owner owner

contestation

market

contestation

Page 16: Is Development a Science? – The Case of the Mumbai Slum

1. property rights

efficiency

empowerment

Page 17: Is Development a Science? – The Case of the Mumbai Slum

1. property rights

efficiency

Page 18: Is Development a Science? – The Case of the Mumbai Slum

buyer seller$

Page 19: Is Development a Science? – The Case of the Mumbai Slum

1. displacement/gentrification

2. new squatters

3. win-win scenario

Page 20: Is Development a Science? – The Case of the Mumbai Slum

efficient outcome 1

efficient outcome 2

efficient outcome 3

efficiency ≠

development

efficiency =

gentrification

Page 21: Is Development a Science? – The Case of the Mumbai Slum

budget media growth quality of life

10.2 9.9 9.5

9.4

outcome 1 outcome 2 outcome 3

outcome 4

Page 22: Is Development a Science? – The Case of the Mumbai Slum

budget media growth quality of life

10.2 9.9 9.5

9.4

outcome 1 outcome 2 outcome 3

outcome 4

debate

debate

debate

Page 23: Is Development a Science? – The Case of the Mumbai Slum

1. property rights

empowerment

Page 24: Is Development a Science? – The Case of the Mumbai Slum

1. limit on size of flat

2. cooperatives

3. 70% 100% consent

Page 25: Is Development a Science? – The Case of the Mumbai Slum

slum-dwellers

caste

religion

sect

gender

age

income

power

power

Page 26: Is Development a Science? – The Case of the Mumbai Slum

diversity of slum co-op

solidarity / collective

interest

project implementation

divergence divergence divergence

coercion

contestation

coercion

Page 27: Is Development a Science? – The Case of the Mumbai Slum

1. free-for-all vs. equal gains

2. preserve gains vs. fight gentrification

3. target the top vs. target the bottom

Page 28: Is Development a Science? – The Case of the Mumbai Slum

1. property rights

efficiency

empowerment

coercion

contestation

debate

distribution

Page 29: Is Development a Science? – The Case of the Mumbai Slum

2. microfinance

Page 30: Is Development a Science? – The Case of the Mumbai Slum

small microcredit loans

contract/collateral

rural/urban

group/individual

general/housing

Page 31: Is Development a Science? – The Case of the Mumbai Slum

microcredit

home ownership

financial inclusion

poverty alleviation

Page 32: Is Development a Science? – The Case of the Mumbai Slum

contract

collateralinformal norms

Page 33: Is Development a Science? – The Case of the Mumbai Slum

collateral

Page 34: Is Development a Science? – The Case of the Mumbai Slum

collateral

MFI

lending group

individual

borrower

borrower in

group

intimate knowledge

local hire

data

Page 35: Is Development a Science? – The Case of the Mumbai Slum

collateralintimate knowledge

data

Page 36: Is Development a Science? – The Case of the Mumbai Slum

microcredit

home ownership

financial inclusion

poverty alleviation

Page 37: Is Development a Science? – The Case of the Mumbai Slum

volatile/erratic income

no stable residence/on the move

weak social network

risky borrower

‘poorest of the poor’

Page 38: Is Development a Science? – The Case of the Mumbai Slum

microcredit

financial inclusion

microcredit

Page 39: Is Development a Science? – The Case of the Mumbai Slum

3. architecture & development

Page 40: Is Development a Science? – The Case of the Mumbai Slum

practical

shelter

order

Page 41: Is Development a Science? – The Case of the Mumbai Slum
Page 42: Is Development a Science? – The Case of the Mumbai Slum

geometry

form-function

liberation

commodity

Page 43: Is Development a Science? – The Case of the Mumbai Slum
Page 44: Is Development a Science? – The Case of the Mumbai Slum

slum as typology

functionality

fetish

Page 45: Is Development a Science? – The Case of the Mumbai Slum

conclusion

Page 46: Is Development a Science? – The Case of the Mumbai Slum