Upload
annika-saellstroem
View
461
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Involvement of end-users - approaches and experiences
John KrogstieWireless Trondheim Living Lab
Professor in Information Systems, NTNU, Trondheim Norway
Research and ”Business”Wireless
Trondheim Access WiFi open air network, with roaming (handover)
and location service. A shared physical infrastructure that can be used by multiple service
providers (ISPs)
Wireless Trondheim Laboratories
Service LabMobile and Locations Based
Services
Network Lab Wireless Access and Network Techn.
Intelligent Transport Systems
Different user-oriented tasks
• Providing user stories • Idea and concept generation • Evaluation of solutions of different levels of
fidelidity
Solution/actor fidelitySolution \
actor- fidelityDeveloper -
testFew proxy
usersFew actual
usersMany proxy
usersMany actual
usersScenario Idea-
generationIdea-
generationPaper
prototypeNA Idea-
generationAcceptance
feedback?Idea-
generationTechnical
mock up Proof-of-
concept prototyping
Functional mock up
Acceptance feedback
Simulated device
Part of development/Heuristic evaluation
Idea generation
Real device in controlled environment
Technical test/heuristic evaluation
Usability test Usability test
Real device in real environment
Technical test/heursitic evaluation
Usability test Usability test Statistical test of acceptance
Mobile shopping assistance using personalization
Acceptance feedback with use of existing user pools
• 200 persons were recruited to perform a TAM (technology acceptance) evaluation.
• A randomly selection of persons, and the persons we selected were in the range of 20-40 years old, and had a 50/50 distribution of male and females.
• The selection were chosen from a Norstat panel and the experiment was run in Norstat’s survey solution.
• Some other personal traits was asked about, including the affinity to ecological food, and to perceived importance of buying healthy food.
• Our personalisation ideas for the experiment were presented as two videos• For each video the participants had to give their opinion using a likert-scale in a
questionnaire that had 13 questions per video • When 200 persons had answered the questions, we got the results from
Norstat, with no identifying information whatsoever, thus not having own issues with privacy (but neither the possibility to follow-up).
MSIS – Mobile Student Information System
Evaluation MSIS
• Recruited student (40-50) by direct contact + ’ads’
• Using real system on devices doing predetermined tasks
• Renumeration by ”lottery”• (alternative used in other cases, recruitment
through student organizations, they are paid per respondent)
• From MSIS to Campus Guide
User-driven innovation of mobile services in Trondheim– example; FindMyFriends-FindPerAnton-FriendRadar
• Mobile social software application • Autumn 2007 during bi-annual student festival• Location tagging of students at the student society, 1661
registered users/tags• Accenture, Sonitor (ultrasound positioning), IBM, NTNU
(follow-up research)• Spring 2008, similar idea tested in Wireless Trondheim with
different outdoor positioning facilities (e.g. wlan positioning)• Secondary school-class as users/testers
Smart City Trondheim
• Collaboration between Trondheim Municipality, Siemens and Bellona
• + 1/10 of the households have signed up, and developed simple energy plans (for how to save on energy usage)
• Involvement of school-children and kindergardens through involvement of the municipality
• http://www.trondheimsmartcity.no/
Summary
• Solution/actor-fidelity• Always a challenge to get involvement of the right
type of users• Use existing services for user-recruitment if possible
(and economically feasible)• Alliances with partners with legitimate contact and
goodwill among users• Needs from research often co-incide with needs from
innovation (but must be though of up front)• Privacy issues