Upload
kuebra-okumus
View
263
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Introduction to Second Language Acquisition- Understanding 'Theory'
Citation preview
Lightbrown’s Classification of Research on Second Language
Learning0Descriptive: collecting speech samples from second
language speakers and then comparing these samplesto target language norms
0Experimental pedagogical studies: manipulatingcertain variables experimentally to determine theireffect on classroom learning.
0Hypothesis-testing studies: testing hypothesis basedon the findings of previous research
Theory
0A way of interpreting,criticizing and unifyingestablishedgeneralizations.
0A system of facts andlaws.
0The facts and laws takeon a new light from thetheory; the theoryillumniates facts andlaws.
Hypothesis Theory
Definition
A suggested explanation for an observable phenomenon or prediction of a possible causal correlation among multiple phenomena.
In science, a theory is a well-substantiated, unifying explanation for a set of verified, proven hypotheses.
Based onSuggestion, possibility, projection or prediction, but the result is uncertain.
Certainty, evidence, verification, repeated testing.
Testable Yes Yes
Falsifiable Yes Yes
Is well substantiated No Yes
DataUsually based on very limited data
Based on a very wide set of data tested under various circumstances.
Three assumptions basic toscientific research
1) Research is inseparable from theory
2) There is no one scientific method
3) There is no single scientific truth
The functions of theories
0Understanding
0Transformation
0 Prediction
Types of theories
There are at least two different dimensions that can be used to classify theories: form or content
0 Form: deductive or inductive
0 Content: micro or macro
Deductive approach
0 It characterizes formal theories inwhich the concepts of the theoryare related to each other in a set ofpropositions that are assumed tobe true without proof. Theseconstitute the axioms of the theory.Given these basic axioms orassumptions, laws of logic areapplied to obtain new propositions.This procedure is called ‘deducingthe consequences of the theory’.The new propositions that followfrom the assumptions of the theoryare called ‘hypotheses’. If thesehypotheses are empiricallysupported, they become laws andthe facts of the theory.
Inductive approach
0 It progresses from theaccumulation of sets of factsand sets of laws to theory.Hypotheses are derivedfrom the theory as a result ofgaps in the network ofempirical relationships.Hypotheses are theinvestigator’s best hunchabout a new relationship,given certain empirical facts.
Deductive theories Inductive theories
Beginning point Interim solutions Empirical data
Network Theoretical cencepts andconstructs
Relationships between laws
Ultimate goal Explanation Explanation
Advantage More interesting claims Close to data
Disadvantage Remote from data Limited claims
The construction of theories
Evaluating theory
Norms of validation can be grouped in three categories:
0 Correspondence norms
0Norms of coherence
0 Pragmatic norms
Correspondence norms
0Definitional adequacy-the correspondence of thetheory to some external reality: If a theory is to tell usanything about the world, it must contain empiricalelements. There must be some connection to theinter-subjective world of observation and experience,or the theory is indistinguishable from fantasy.
0Explanatory power- correspondence of the theory tothe facts the theory is to explain: The concepts of atheory need to be defined in a way that clarifies theirmeaning; that is in such a manner that differentspersons will interpret them in the same way.
Operationalizm
Operational definitions: the idea is that a concept issynonymous with the operations that are necessary forits measurement.
The problems related to operationalizm:
0Why one set of operations is chosen rather thananother one?
0There may be two, or more, different ways ofmeasuring a concept.
0Many concepts in a theory have only indirectreference to experience.
Norms of coherence
0The more simple the theory, the greater its appeal toour understanding.
0 If a theory is inconsistent with related acceptabletheories, it has relatively less antecedent probabilityof being valid.
Pragmatic norms
0The theory should be elegant in its formulation
0 ‘There is nothing as practical as a good theory’
Confirmation
0 In addition to three forms addressed above, there is another condition: falsifiability.
A good theory…
0 fits the data well
0 is consistent with related formulations
0 is clear in their predictions
0 is heuristically rich
0 is capable of disconfirmation
Prepared based on the book ‘Theories of Second-Language Learning’ by Barry McLaughlin.
THANKS FOR LISTENING
Kübra OKUMUŞ