Upload
heastem
View
490
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Integrating Virtual Experiments into the
Overall laboratory Experience
HEA workshop
Paul Yates 27 Nov 2014
What is a virtual experiment?
Examples
Advantages and limitations
Research work
Role in the overall laboratory
Launch of project report
Workshop outline
The Open Science Laboratory
Earthquake
Plant Cells
Explore the nature of science
Develop team work
Cultivating interest in science
Promote conceptual understanding
Develop inquiry skills
Laboratory Teaching
Develop practical skills
Experience troubleshooting
Set up equipment
Observation over long time span
Develop conceptual knowledge via tactile information
Authentic delays between experiments
Deal with unanticipated events
Measurement uncertainties
8
Physical laboratories
Simplify learning
Highlight salient information
Remove confusing details
Modify time scale
Unobservable phenomena
Link to symbolic equations
Gather more information
Student prompts
Instructional data
9
Virtual laboratories
Change magnetic field of the earth
Vary accumulation of greenhouse gases
Extreme heart rate and blood pressure
10
Unobservable phenomena
These new technologies do not replace educators but
replace the educators’ role by pushing them from the
position of information source to creative managers and
facilitators in learning experiences.
In order to be successful in such a change, the educators
need to adapt themselves in new technologies and
knowhow to get benefits from these technologies in their
classroom environments;
12
Kara et al.
One practice observed in VRL applications is to design GUIs
which are replicas of laboratory equipment of particular
brands. A drawback of this approach is the difficulty of
modifying the GUI and its functionality when the underlying
equipment needs to be replaced by different brand or
model. Designing GUIs that incorporate generic instrument
panels and equipment illustrations eliminates this weakness
while satisfying the users desire to use, to some extent,
actual GUIs.
13
Lila (Library of Labs)
SCORM packages
Repository of shared
experiments
Integrate into Learning
Management Systems
Orientation, execution,
review
16
Richter, Tetour and Boehringer
Some conventional laboratories must remain in the
curriculum. for labs that involve a kinesthetic element and
require the development of specific motor skills to ensure
success.
Universities’ teaching times often coincide, meaning that only
a small number of institutions can use a given remote
experiment as part of their undergraduate course.
17
Coble et al.
18
In remote experiments, students are usually required to
follow strict procedures in order to complete an experiment
safely and on time. Virtual experiments have few constraints
with regard to time and safety, and are well suited to an
exploratory style of learning, which teaches fundamental
concepts and improves theoretical understanding.
Potential benefits:
• students would feel more relaxed and comfortable in the laboratory;
• less laboratory time would be wasted looking for items of apparatus;
• students would be more likely to assemble and use apparatus in the
correct way leading to more meaningful experimental results;
• greater familiarity with laboratory procedures may improve safety;
and
• students could devote more of their attention to the concepts
involved in the experiments because they would already be familiar
with the procedural aspects of the task.
19
Dalgarno, Bishop and Bedgood
20
Highest priorities:
• skills in recording, reporting and interpreting observations;
• higher level cognitive skills of deductive reasoning, hypothesis
formation and testing;
• skills related to manipulative and instrument use.
Studies showing no difference in conceptual understanding:
Wiesner and Lan (chemical engineering)
Zacharia and Constantinou (heat and temperature)
21
Physical vs virtual laboratories
Only a requirement for the development of conceptual
knowledge or inquiry skills where students have no
previous relevant physical experience with the
phenomenon or concept under study.
22
Tactile information
Students investigating simulated electric circuits showing
moving electrons acquired more conceptual knowledge
than those using physical materials.
23
Finkelstein et al.
Students using virtual optics materials displaying light rays
outperformed those using physical materials.
24
Olympiou and Zacharia
Virtual laboratory offered students more time to experience
experiment and to concentrate on concepts. Allowed
faster manipulation of materials.
Students conducting a virtual and a physical laboratory
outperformed students performing only the physical
laboratory on conceptual understanding of heat and
temperature.
25
Zacharia
A group of microbiology students who performed physical
laboratories were less successful on a conceptual test than
a group where a simulation was substituted for one
laboratory session.
26
Huppert et al.
Students who used a simulation of distillation preceding the
physical laboratory had an advantage over students who did
not.
27
Climent-Bellido et al.
No significant difference between starting with the virtual
laboratory followed by a physical laboratory compared to
the reverse order (DNA gel electrophoresis).
28
Toth et al.
No difference between virtual-physical and physical-virtual
sequence in conceptual understanding of pulleys.
29
Chini et al.
Draw a graphical representation of how a virtual experiment
could be related to other aspects of the laboratory:
Pre-laboratory work
Hands on experiments
Report writing
Data analysis
Design
Planning
30
The overall laboratory