11

Click here to load reader

Inquiry presentation

  • Upload
    wall530

  • View
    157

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Inquiry presentation

Blended Learningin Elementary Reading

Page 2: Inquiry presentation

Instructional Context

• PK

• 4th and 5th Grade Learning Community

• 2 Year Curriculum

• Mixed Grade Level

• One-to-One

Page 3: Inquiry presentation

Wondering

How can I effectively incorporate iPads into the reading

block?

“Technology has the ability to incorporate meaningful, social interactions into the learning

process” (Ally, 2004, n.p.).

Page 4: Inquiry presentation

Effectiveadj. - producing a result that is wanted: having an intended effect

• Engagement

• Differentiated

• Collaborative

• Multiple avenues of assessmentThe learning process requires students to receive multiple opportunities to

practice and just as much targeted feedback (Weigel, 2009).

Page 5: Inquiry presentation

The Plan

Students• Access materials

• PDF Notes and Diigo

• ePortfolio

• Online discussions

Pedagogical objectives and activities should drive the approaches that

faculty use in instruction (Picciano, 2009).

Teacher• Manage online

discussions

• Anecdotal records

• Student examples

In a blended model, teachers actually have the time and opportunity to work one-on-one with students and achieve

real differentiated instruction (Watson, n.d.).

Page 6: Inquiry presentation

Goal setting blended

Mini-Lesson face-to-face

Autonomous Time blended

Reflection blended

Share face-to-faceWhen students provide feedback they are

gaining effective critical thinking and communication skills as well as becoming

lifelong learners with increased collaboration skills (Neilson, 2003).

In Practice

Instruction is not always about learning content or a skill but is also about supporting students socially and emotionally (Picciano, 2009).

Page 7: Inquiry presentation

Data Collection• Conference Videos

• Student Surveys

• Conference Notes

• Student Reflections

• Student Portfolios

• Outside Observations

“Blended learning is a complex weaving of the face-to-face and online communities so that

participants move between them in a seamless manner” (Garrison & Vaughan, 2008).

Edmodo is our home base

Complex Weaving

Page 8: Inquiry presentation

Data Analysis1. Sometimes paper is

better

2. Student collaboration

is critical

3. Organization can be

easier

Page 9: Inquiry presentation

Effective?adj. - producing a

result that is wanted: having an intended effect

• Engagement

• Differentiated

• Collaborative

• Multiple avenues of assessment

85% of students responded using iPads in reading was “awesome”.

“I like using the edmodo groups for reading to help each other improve each others performance and

to help each other better think about our their rating.”

“We get to give helpful tips to each other which helps us grow as a reader.”

“I like how our partners give us feedback and help us know what we need to work on.”

When students provide feedback they are gaining effective critical thinking and communication skills

as well as becoming lifelong learners with increased collaboration skills (Neilson, 2003).

Page 10: Inquiry presentation

Next StepsWithin the current blended learning reading structure, how can I incorporate an e-portfolio in order to help my

students become self-regulated learners?

“Portfolios prompt students to look back, to digest and debrief, and to review what happened so that they can set new goals and determine next steps” (as

cited in Wade et al, 2005, n.p.)

Page 11: Inquiry presentation

ReferencesAlly, M. (2004.) Foundations of Educational Theory for

Online Learning. Theory and Practice of Online Learning. Athabasca University Press: CA.

Bartolomé, A., & Steffens, K. (2011). Self-regulated learning in technology enhanced learning environments. Technology Enhanced Learning, 6, 21-31.

Garrison, D.R. & Vaughan, N.D. (2008). Blended Learning in Higher Education: Framework, Principles, and Guidelines. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Milne, A.J. (2006). Designing Blended Learning Spaces. In D. Oblinger (Ed.) Learning Spaces. Educause.

Neilson, L. B. (2003). Importance of student peer feedback. College Teaching. Retrieved from

Sheskey, B. (2010). Creating learning connections with today’s tech-savvy student. In Jacobs, H. H. (Ed.), Curriculum 21: Essential education for a changing world. Alexandria, VA: ASCD.

Watson (n.d.). Blended learning: The convergence of online and Fface-to-face learning. NACOL.

Weigel, M., James, C., & Gardner, H. (2009). Learning: Peering backward and looking forward in the digital era. International Journal of Learning and Media, 1(1), 1-18.

West, D. (2011). Using Technology to Personalize Learning and Assess Students in Real-Time. Retrieved from http://www.brookings.edu/research/papers/2011/10/06-personalize-learning-west.

http://tinyurl.com/odcz3ac

Picciano, A. (2009). Blending with Purpose: The Multimodal Model. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 13(1), 7-18.