21
Improving Institutional QA throught student's participation Mihai VILCEA, Alina GAVRA ASPR International Conference of Psychology Students, 6-9 May, 2010

impstudents participation in QA at institutional level

  • Upload
    mihai

  • View
    462

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

 

Citation preview

Page 1: impstudents participation in QA at institutional level

Improving Institutional QA throught

student's participation

Mihai VILCEA, Alina GAVRAASPR International Conference of Psychology Students, 6-9 May, 2010

Page 2: impstudents participation in QA at institutional level

First of all

the idea of EHEA

Page 3: impstudents participation in QA at institutional level

Bologna process

Action lines like:

- three cycle system

- social dimension

- mobility

- qualification framework

- QA

Page 4: impstudents participation in QA at institutional level

Quality Assurance is an ongoing process that ensures the delivery of agreed

standards in a educational institution.

Page 5: impstudents participation in QA at institutional level

QA can be approached from two points of view:

- internal QA

all process in which are involved the members of academic community

- external QA

includes all the action and feedback from stakeholders outside the university

Page 6: impstudents participation in QA at institutional level

Why should involve students in quality assurance?

students are aware of what they need

students have a fundamental interest

the quality of their education affect professional careers

Page 7: impstudents participation in QA at institutional level

Report on the Implementation of Bologna Process 2009 – student perspective

Realized by ANOSR

23 universities

36 students organizations

Page 8: impstudents participation in QA at institutional level

Main Conclusions on internal QA

Students tend not to be regarded as equal partners in educational and decision-making structures

Not all the universities in Romania involve students in QA departments – 12% of the HEI don’t involve students

Only 10% of the QA Departments focus on research on social dimension regarding students

In only 22% of universities students are directly involved in curriculum design

Page 9: impstudents participation in QA at institutional level

• Adaptation of the teaching methods (<50% changed their teaching styles and instruments for SCL improvement)

• Organizations consider that ECTS was implemented just formally

Page 10: impstudents participation in QA at institutional level

External QA

One of the main role is played by the institutional evaluation program

Romanian case: ARACIS is the Quality Assurance Agency in Romania

Students are equal partners

Need for better understanding of QA (students view)

Enhancing quality through creating a quality culture

Page 11: impstudents participation in QA at institutional level

Being equal partners at national level, students began to acquire experience and knowledge in QA.

The feedback from stakeholders was gratifying

Page 12: impstudents participation in QA at institutional level

Next stepInvolving students in internal QA:

– Being recognize like partners

– Full members in all commissions

– Starting a QA culture with the student education

Page 13: impstudents participation in QA at institutional level

Thank You

for

your attention!

Page 14: impstudents participation in QA at institutional level
Page 15: impstudents participation in QA at institutional level
Page 16: impstudents participation in QA at institutional level
Page 17: impstudents participation in QA at institutional level
Page 18: impstudents participation in QA at institutional level
Page 19: impstudents participation in QA at institutional level
Page 20: impstudents participation in QA at institutional level
Page 21: impstudents participation in QA at institutional level