17
H1 2011 IFRS Results From volumes to returns Conference Call August 18, 2011

H1 2011 IFRS Results

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: H1 2011 IFRS Results

H1 2011 IFRS ResultsFrom volumes to returns

Conference Call

August 18, 2011

Page 2: H1 2011 IFRS Results

2

Key takeaways

Despite low interest

rate environment…

…solid and high-

profitable balance

sheet structure…

…results into material

margin growth

Inflationary environment was steady in Q2 – just 0.0-0.1% weekly level

with distinct downward trend from 9.4% YoY by the end of June

CBR kept refinancing rate at 8.25% in May managing liquidity in the

system with deposit (+25bps to 3.5%) and repo rates (5.5%). Excessive

liquidity in banking system is gradually shrinking

Average corporate loan rates continued to fall in April (to 8,3%) and May

(to 8.0%) hiking in June to 8.7%

LTD ratio stood at solid 98.1% with interest earning assets comprising

77% of total assets

Loan portfolio share increased from 62% a year ago to 69% driven by

loans expansion in retail (40% YoY) and SME (30% YoY)

Though IEA grew, the bank kept adequate liquidity cushion of 24%

Interest income grew by 12% QoQ on the back of reasonable interest

rate policy and healthy lending growth

Interest expenses contracted by 6% QoQ driven by eliminating “sticky

deposits” effect following next 39bps cost of funds reduction from 4.69% to

4.3%

NII boosted by 36% resulted in long-awaited NIM rebound by 106 bps

from 3.2% in Q1 to 4.3% in Q2

Page 3: H1 2011 IFRS Results

3

Financial highlights

Q2’11 Q1’11 Q2’10 QoQ YoY

NIM 4.3% 3.2% 3.7% +1.1 pps +0.6 pps

Net interest income 1,857 1,364 1,379 +36.1% +34.7%

Net fee income 1,192 1,006 975 +18.5% +22.3%

Operating expenses (2,091) (1,798) (1,679) +16.3% +24.5%

Net income 395 317 121 +24.6% +226%

ROE 9.1% 7.5% 2.9% +1.6 pps 6.2 pps

Gross loan portfolio 132,729 126,036 102,474 +5.3% +29.5%

Customer accounts 135,288 136,874 118,075 -1.2% +14.6%

L/D 98.1% 92.1% 86.8% +6.0 pps +11.3 pps

NPLs 11,030 11,061 10,814 -0.3% +2%

NPLs as % of loan portfolio 8.3% 8.8% 10.5% -0.5 pps -2.2 pps

Capital adequacy 13.6% 14.1% 17.2% -0.5 pps -3.6 pps

Page 4: H1 2011 IFRS Results

4

3,7% 3,3% 3,5% 3,2%4,3%

NIM

-2,1 -2,0 -1,9 -1,8 -1,7

3,5 3,2 3,3 3,1 3,5

Interest Expenses

Interest Income

Q1’11Q2’10 Q3’10

+0.4%

Q4’10

+12.1%

-19.4%

Interest

Income and

Interest

Expenses,

RUB bln

NIM

evolution

+52 bps

Q1’11Q2’10 Q3’10 Q4’10

Q2’11

Q2’11

-6.2%

- Interest income grew +0.4% on a year-on-year

basis first time since the beginning of the

crisis as a result of yields stabilization and

loan growth. During the quarter interest

income gained 12.1% versus 5% QoQ growth

of the loan book.

- Efforts on funding costs optimization resulted

in interest expenses decline for the 4th quarter

in a row (-6.2% QoQ) due to retail deposits re-

pricing.

- Net interest margin on total average assets

hiked by 106 bps QoQ driven by loan book

growth and contraction of interest expenses

Impressive NIM rebound

Page 5: H1 2011 IFRS Results

5

31,9% 32,9% 35,3% 28,9% 25,9%

36,2% 36,5%

50,9%

41,9%40,2%

Personnel expenses

Other expenses

Sizeable fee-income supports revenue expansion

1,4 1,3 1,4 1,4 1,9

1,0 1,0 1,1 1,01,2

0,1 0,2 0,1 0,2

0,1

-1,7 -1,7-2,3 -1,8 -2,1

Net interest income

Net fees

Q2’10 Q3’10 Q4’10 Q1’11

+24.5%

+28.3%+24.6%

Operating

Income and

Expenses,

RUB bln

Cost to

Income

before

provisions,%

-2.16 pps

Q2’10 Q3’10 Q4’10 Q1’11

+16.3%

Q2’11

Q2’11

- Fee-generating products demonstrated

excellent performance, net fees grew by 22%

YoY while total non-interest income increased

by 20% YoY. This resulted in solid 41% share

of non-interest income in total operating

income before provisions. Total revenue was

up 24.6% QoQ driven by stronger fees from

settlements and cash transactions coupled

with healthy loan growth.

- Operating expenses increased by 16.3% QoQ

primarily resulted from to the growth of

personnel expenses as we accrued provisions

for payment of annual bonuses for 2011 across

2-4th quarters in equal parts.

- Cost to income ratio declined by 4.75 pps QoQ

due to accelerated revenue growth in the

second quarter.66%71%

86%

69%68%

Page 6: H1 2011 IFRS Results

6

0,10,2 0,2

0,30,4

Provisioning policy in line with expectations

-0,7 -0,6-0,003 -0,4

-0,6

0,8 2,3 0,4

0,71,1

Operating profit before provisions

Provisions

+36.3%

Q2’10 Q3’10 Q4’10 Q1’11

+24.6%+226%

Operating

profit and

provisions,

RUB bln

Net profit,

RUB bln

+44.9%

Q2’10 Q3’10 Q4’10 Q1’11

Q2’11

Q2’11

- Cost of risk accounted for 1.8% in the second

quarter compared to 1.2% in Q1 2011 and 2.7%

in Q2 2010, the level that implied by the

financial plan for 2011. Charges to provisions

amounted to Rub 576 mln in Q2 and this

allowed to improve total NPL coverage ratio to

109%. For the NPLs with overdue more than 90

days coverage ratio was at the level of 142%

- Bottom-line growth of 24.6% was supported by

solid NII increase coupled with robust net fees

dynamic.

- Revenue boost resulted in operating profit

growth of 44.9% QoQ

Net profit

Page 7: H1 2011 IFRS Results

7

Balance sheet remains stable…

Assets

RUB bln

102 106 115 126 133118 125 130 137 135

87% 84% 88% 92%98%

Q2'10 Q3'10 Q4'10 Q1'11 Q2'11

Gross loans Customer funds

RUB bln

IEA share increased to 77% of total assets

5%

58%11%

8%

0%

18%

LTD ratio improving

Corporate loan

portfolioRetail loan

portfolio

Other assets

Due from other

banks

Cash and

equivalents

Securities

…while loan portfolio gains momentum

72,065,959,857,255,4

20,117,5

16,615,214,4

5,58,5

8,17,38,4

35,134,2

30,725,924,4

Q2'11Q1'11Q4'10Q3'10Q2'10

SME Individuals Administrations Large corporates

+29.5%

+5.3%

9 9 9 8 9

79 79 88 98 102

13 1416

16 1918 19

1417 14

1628 3433

34 30147 156 166 174

174

Q2'10 Q3'10 Q4'10 Q1'11 Q2'11

Cash and equivalents

Due from banks

Securities

Retail loans

Corporate loans

Other assets

Page 8: H1 2011 IFRS Results

8

22 826

53 521

56 382

25%

15%4%

24%

6%

8%

4%3% 11%

Loans

Breakdown by industryMoscow oblast remains the key region

SMEs drive growth in corporate… …and mortgages in retail segment

RUB

132,729

mln

65,9 72,0

34,235,1

8,55,5

КВ1 2011 КВ2 2011

10,512,1

4,8

5,82,1

2,2

КВ1 2011 КВ2 2011

108,6 112,6

SME

Large clients

Administrations

+2.6%

-35.2%

+9.3%Mortgages

Consumer and

auto loans

Cards

+20.1%

+3.9%

+15.2%

Rub blnRub bln

20,1

17,5

Moscow Oblast

(41%)

Moscow (17%)

Other

regions

(42%)

*as of 30.06.2011 *as of 30.06.2011

Construction

ManufacturingAgriculture

Wholesale &

retail trade Administrations

Other

Transport

Individuals

RUB

132,729

mln

Total Loans

Corporate Loans

Retail Loans

VZRZ Sector

+31.5%

+5.4%QoQ

YoY +17.8%

+6.0%

VZRZ Sector

+29.5%

+3.6%QoQ

YoY +16.0%

+5.2%

VZRZ Sector

+43.0%

+16.2%QoQ

YoY +24.0%

+8.6%

Page 9: H1 2011 IFRS Results

9

850

2 1602 936

1 624 1 626

6,4% 6,4%6,4% 5,6%

7,0%

3,2%

8,0%

9,3%

4,6%4,6%

Q2 2010 Q3 2010 Q4 2010 Q1 2011 Q2 2011

Large corporate

NPLs, RUB mln Provisions, % of total loans NPLs, % of total loans

+2 new NPLs

Credit quality management

NPLs categorization: improvements in SMEs

NPLs dynamics

15

Annualized cost of risk

* NPL includes the whole principal of loans at least one day overdue either on

principal or interest as well as not overdue loans with signs of impairment

8 605 8 155 8 117 8 195 8 025

12,9% 13,4%12,1%

11,6% 11,0%

13,9%12,9%

12,1%

11,2%10,4%

Q2 2010 Q3 2010 Q4 2010 Q1 2011 Q2 2011

SMEs

1 359 1 2771 025

1 242 1 379

7,2%7,0%

6,4%

6,2%5,3%

9,5%8,4%

6,2% 7,1% 6,9%

Q2 2010 Q3 2010 Q4 2010 Q1 2011 Q2 2011

Retail

1,80%1,16%

0,01%

2,22%

2,70%

1,50%

1,16%

1,83%

2,51%

2,66%

Q2 2011Q1 2011Q4 2010Q3 2010Q2 2010

Charges to provisions to avg gross loans, QoQ

Charges to provisions to avg gross loans, YtD

- 857 recoveries

+657 new NPLs- 332 recoveries

+469 new NPLs

10 81411592

12078

11061 11030

10,44% 10,68% 9,71%9,15% 9,09%

10,55%10,98% 10,48%

8,78% 8,31%

Q2 2010 Q3 2010 Q4 2010 Q1 2011 Q2 2011

NPLs, RUB mlnProvisions, % of total portfolioNPLs, % of total portfolio

*

RUB mln

Page 10: H1 2011 IFRS Results

10

Credit quality

as of 30.06.2011Large

corporateSMEs Mortgages Other

retailTotal % of

total loans

Gross loans, including 35,109 77,491 12,138 7,991 132,729 100.0%

Current loans 33,483 69,466 11,428 7,322 121,699 91.69%

Past-due but not impaired, of them 0 112 504 187 803 0.60%

Less than 90 days - 112 444 172 728 0.55%

Over 90 days - - 60 15 75 0.5%

Impaired, of them 1,626 7,913 206 482 10,227 7.71%

Less than 90 days 776 995 - 34 1,805 1.36%

Over 90 days 850 6,918 206 448 8,422 6.35%

Total NPLs 1,626 8,025 710 669 11,030 8.31%

Provisions - 2,455 - 8,540 - 476 - 599 -12,070 9.09%

Net Loans 32,654 68,951 11,662 7,391 120, 658 -

Provisions to

NPLs Ratio

NPL -

109%

Rescheduled

Loans

6.1%the whole amount of loans with principal overdue for more than 1 day as well

as loans with any delay in interest payments.

Provisions to

90 days+

NPLs

142%

Page 11: H1 2011 IFRS Results

11

Maturity gap not higher than 5% of the balance

24%

27%21%

28%

Q1 2011

24%

23%

19%

34%

Q2 2011Less than 1 month

1-6 months

6-12 months

Over 12 months

Stable funding base…

Liabilities and capital

16 17 17 17 185 4 4 4 4

8 84 56 6 717 18 17 21 20

24 26 2831 3015 14

1715 17

6366

6970 69

147 156166

174 174

Q2 2010 Q3 2010 Q4 2010 Q1 2011 Q2 2011

Retail deposits

Retail accounts

Corporate deposits

Securities issued

Due from other banks

Subordinated loans

Equity

RUB bln

…with strengthening long-term retail resources

Capital position reflects business development

Rub bln

14,1% 13,5% 12,8% 12,0% 11,8%

17,2% 16,3%15,2%

14,1% 13,6% 12,7%

Q2 2010 Q3 2010 Q4 2010 Q1 2011 Q2 2011 30.06.11

Tier 1 Tier 1 + Tier 2 CAR under CBR rules

(N1)

11%

MIN

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

On demand and less than 1

month

From 1 to 6 months

From 6 to 12 months

More than 1 year

Total assets

Total libilities

Page 12: H1 2011 IFRS Results

12

3,20%

0,82%

0,30%0,00% 0,07%

4,26%

Q1 NIM Loans effect

Deposits effect

Other Base effect

Q2 NIM

Key factors of NIM recovery

3,7% 3,3% 3,5% 3,2%4,3%

6,5%

5,6% 5,8%

5,1%

6,3%

NIM

Interest Spread

+106bps

Q4’10Q2’10 Q3’10 Q1’11

3,6% 3,2% 3,7%

6,3%

5,1%5,7%

NIM Interest Spread

Q2’11 6M’112010 3M’11

Quarterly NIM rebound… …resulted in cumulative NIM recovery

+12bps

+106 bps6,49%

5,59% 5,79% 5,14%6,30%

12,9%11,6% 11,0%

9,8%10,60%

6,42% 6,00%5,21% 4,69% 4,30%

Q2 2010 Q3 2010 Q4 2010 Q1 2011 Q2 2011

Interest SpreadYield on earning assets (net)Cost of funds

… and upward spread development

Page 13: H1 2011 IFRS Results

13

57%

14%

25%

3%1%

276 304 287 288 340

248 262 277 230291

159 170 190 196

226

292308 335

292

3359751 044 1 089 1 006

1 192

Q2 2010 Q3 2010 Q4 2010 Q1 2011 Q2 2011

Settlements Cash transactions Other Cards

23%25%

37%41%

0,0% 1,0% 2,0% 3,0% 4,0%

Net fee margin

vbank

peer 1

peer 2

peer 3

Fees and commissions

Key points

Net fee income distribution

RUB mln

Vbank’s share of net fee income in total operating income

before provisions remained one of the highest among Russian

banks and stood at 38% in Q2 2011 while fee margin was 2,7%

which is also higher than for our peers.

Fees and commissions demonstrated robust growth

of 22% YoY and remained well-diversified across different

banking products with main contribution from settlements

and banking cards.

Corporate business continued to be the driver of fee income

with 57% of fees generated followed by 25% from banking

cards business and 14% from retail segment.

Non-interest income breakdown by segments

57%

14%

26%

3%

Cards

Financial

Corporate

business

Retail business

Others

Strong non-interest income based on long-term

relations with customers

Cards

Financial Corporate

business

Retail business

Q1 2011 Q2 2011

* Vbank data as of 2Q’11, Peer1, Peer2, Peer 3 - FY2010

Share of non-interest

income in total operating

income b.p.

2,7%

+18.5%

+22.3%

Page 14: H1 2011 IFRS Results

14

Cost-to-Income ratio

Costs

72,3%

62,70%

52,7%48,7%

72,6%68,20%

2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 H1 2011

*2006 - less extraordinary items

*

Operating expenses breakdown

Costs summary

RUB mln

Since Q2 the bank started to accrue provisions for

2011 bonuses scheduled to be paid at year-end that

resulted into higher personnel costs.

8931 063

1 271

786735

820

Q2 2010 Q1 2011 Q2 2011

1 679

2 091

1 798

53%

39%

HR

Non- HR

Staff evolution

Given new accruals overall cost growth was 24.5%

YoY. However notwithstanding of adverse impact on

cost growth stemming from social tax changes in

2011, overall cost growth on the same basis was only

14.2% YoY and moderate 6.7% QoQ

Cost to income ratio for H1 2011 declined to 68.2%

from 72.6% for FY 2010

+16.3%

24.5%

6 146 6 146 6 164 6 164 6 211

0,0

10,0

20,0

30,0

40,0

50,0

60,0

70,0

80,0

Q2 2010 Q3 2010 Q4 2010 Q1 2011 Q2 2011

Average headcount per quarter (people)

Staff costs per average employee ('000 RUB)

Page 15: H1 2011 IFRS Results

15

ROE, %

Value generation

ROA, %

Earnings generation capability

2,9%

4,3% 4,4%

7,5%

9,1%

Q2 2010 Q3 2010 Q4 2010 Q1 2011 Q2 2011

Key points* % of average assets

0,33%

0,47% 0,46%

0,74%

0,91%

Q2 2010 Q3 2010 Q4 2010 Q1 2011 Q2 2011

Profitability is on track with all the components

demonstrating robust dynamic, though going forward

our mid-term target for ROE of 20% is still to be

achieved.

We kept improving our value generation capacity even

in the environment of low interest rates supporting the

revenues with non-interest income. In Q2 core

revenues recovered contributing to healthy bottom-

line.4,3%

3,0% -1,3%

-2,9%

-1,9%

-0,2% 0,9%

NIM Non-interest income

Provisions HR costs Non-HR costs

Tax Net profit

Page 16: H1 2011 IFRS Results

16

Questions and answers

[email protected] http://www.vbank.ru/en/investors

Elena Mironova

IR manager

+7 495 620 90 71

[email protected]

Andrey Shalimov

Member of the Management Board

Head of Treasury

[email protected]

Page 17: H1 2011 IFRS Results

17

Disclaimer

Some of the information in this presentation may contain projections or other forward-looking statements regarding future events or the

future financial performance of Bank Vozrozhdenie (the Bank). Such forward-looking statements are based on numerous assumptions

regarding the Bank’s present and future business strategies and the environment in which the Bank will operate in the future.

The Bank cautions you that these statements are not guarantees of future performance and involve risks, uncertainties and other important

factors that we cannot predict with certainty. Accordingly, our actual outcomes and results may differ materially from what we have

expressed or forecasted in the forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements speak only as at the date of this presentation

and are subject to change without notice. We do not intend to update these statements to make them conform with actual results.

The Bank is not responsible for statements and forward-looking statements including the following information:

- assessment of the Bank’s future operating and financial results as well as forecasts of the present value of future cash flows and related

factors;

- economic outlook and industry trends;

- the Bank’s anticipated capital expenditures and plans relating to expansion of the Bank’s network and development of the new services;

- the Bank’s expectations as to its position on the financial market and plans on development of the market segments within which the

Bank operates;

- the Bank’s expectations as to regulatory changes and assessment of impact of regulatory initiatives on the Bank’s activity.

Such forward-looking statements are subject to risks, uncertainties and other factors, which could cause actual results to differ materially

from those expressed or implied by these forward-looking statements. These risks, uncertainties and other factors include:

- risks relating to changes in political, economic and social conditions in Russia as well as changes in global economic conditions;

- risks related to Russian legislation, regulation and taxation;

- risks relating to the Bank’s activity, including the achievement of the anticipated results, levels of profitability and growth, ability to create

and meet demand for the Bank’s services including their promotion, and the ability of the Bank to remain competitive.

Many of these factors are beyond the Bank’s ability to control and predict. Given these and other uncertainties the Bank cautions not to

place undue reliance on any of the forward-looking statements contained herein or otherwise.

The Bank does not undertake any obligations to release publicly any revisions to these forward-looking statements to reflect events or

circumstances after the date hereof or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events, except as may be required under applicable laws.