20
Gun and Ammunition Policy in the United States By Mitch Enriquez

Gun And Ammunition Policy In The United States

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Final policy project presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: Gun And Ammunition Policy In The United States

Gun and Ammunition Policy in the United States

By Mitch Enriquez

Page 2: Gun And Ammunition Policy In The United States

The 2nd Ammendment

Page 3: Gun And Ammunition Policy In The United States

The two important issues Gun regulation

Ammunition Regulation

Page 4: Gun And Ammunition Policy In The United States

Current Gun laws

The four basic requirements -Sanity -Criminal record -Age -Citizenship

Page 5: Gun And Ammunition Policy In The United States

CCW (Concealed Carry Weapon)

Page 6: Gun And Ammunition Policy In The United States

Then how do criminals obtain firearms?

Page 7: Gun And Ammunition Policy In The United States

Ammunition laws in California

Page 8: Gun And Ammunition Policy In The United States

California Assembly bill 962

Page 9: Gun And Ammunition Policy In The United States

Repercussions of C. A. bill 962

Page 10: Gun And Ammunition Policy In The United States

Advataged

Page 11: Gun And Ammunition Policy In The United States

Contenders

Page 12: Gun And Ammunition Policy In The United States

Dependants

Page 13: Gun And Ammunition Policy In The United States

Deviants

Page 14: Gun And Ammunition Policy In The United States

California Assembly bill 962 effectiveness

Page 15: Gun And Ammunition Policy In The United States

The Ammunition Limit

Page 16: Gun And Ammunition Policy In The United States

962 shuts down interstate commerce

Page 17: Gun And Ammunition Policy In The United States

Opponents to California AB 962

Page 18: Gun And Ammunition Policy In The United States

How this bill will affect the rest of the nation

Page 19: Gun And Ammunition Policy In The United States

How local vendors are affected

Page 20: Gun And Ammunition Policy In The United States

In Conclusion

Do you think that it is fair that a minority can suppress a majority?

And in what ways can we really show what the majority really thinks?