Upload
samuel-mann
View
24
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Sustainable development is the kind of development that meets the needs of the present without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs.
Brundtland Commission 1987
As a society we have to learn to live in a complex world of interdependent systems with high uncertainties and multiple legitimate interests. These complex and evolving systems require a new way of thinking about risk, uncertainty, ambiguity and ignorance. These systems require that we can think simultaneously of drivers and impacts of our actions across scales and barriers of space, time, culture, species and disciplinary boundaries.
• Recognition of unseen elements
• See opportunities for sustainable practice
skills
• Identify un/sustainabilityness of actions –
that is recognise if something is
unsustainable, or distinguish degrees of
sustainability
• Present options and ways of
framing alternatives
• How can a collaborative approach based on
motivational interviewing be used to
overcome barriers in behaviour change
• What would be the consequence of
considering an basis of interaction that is a
collaboration with the environment (rather
than on, or about the environment)?
• How can Sustainable Lens position human as
actors rather than stressors?
• How can Sustainable Lens combine human
and biophysical information into a single
coherent narrative?
Objective 1: The development and testing of
a participatory approach to game
development.
Objective 2: Develop a software tool for
creating specific Māori virtual environments:
the “SimPā toolkit”
Objective 3: Develop and test tools for the
use of games in teaching Māori concepts.
Objective 4: Develop techniques and
practices for the further use of GamePā
Objective 5: Develop a new specialist area
in education: Māori digital content
Objective 6. Develop a process of adoption
of this initiative beyond the collaborating
partners
• Overwhelming success, but very
different to that expected.
• Need to abandon a linear flow to
accommodate a process that is very
much more organic.
• SimPā toolkit has ended up being
much more about process –
partnerships of ideas and
capabilities – than about the
technology.
• Need to recognise complex
structures of knowledge ownership
• The project has taken far more
partnership negotiation than the
team ever imagined.
• The SimPā team had to be
indistinguishably both Otago
Polytechnic and Iwi
To what extent do you agree/disagree with the following statements?
Strongly Disagree (1)
Disagree (2) Neither Agree nor Disagree
(3)
Agree (4) Strongly Agree (5)
If it's legal it's ethical
The dignity and welfare of
people should be the most
important concern in society
Selfishness is the best guiding
principle
Questions of what is ethical
for everyone can never be
resolved since what is moral
or immoral is up to the
individual.
Business is a special case, the
ethics are different to personal
life
To what extent do you agree/disagree with the following statements?
Strongly Disagree
(1)
Disagree (2) Neither Agree nor Disagree (3)
Agree (4) Strongly Agree (5)
As long as everyone is following "they are
in it for themselves" society as a whole will
prosper
If I'm operating within the law I don't need to
worry about ethics
It is never necessary to sacrifice others
What is ethical varies from one situation
and society to another
My employer will protect me if anything
goes wrong, so long as I've followed their
rules.
To what extent do you agree/disagree with the following statements?
Strongly Disagree
(1)
Disagree (2) Neither Agree nor Disagree (3)
Agree (4) Strongly Agree (5)
The existence of potential harm to others is
always wrong, irrespective of the benefits to
be gained
My job as a computer professional is to
provide the technical solutions (code or
infrastructure), my managers will have
considered the ethical implications
There is no room in business for soft things
like ethics, if your competitor does it then
you can
Computing is largely theoretical or technical
- with little consequence
The existence of potential harm to others is
always wrong, irrespective of the benefits to
be gained
0 1 2 3 4
It is never necessary to sacrifice others
The existence of potential harm to others is always wrong,irrespective of the benefits to be gained
The dignity and welfare of people should be the most importantconcern in society
There is no room in business for soft things like ethics, if yourcompetitor does it then you can
Business is a special case, the ethics are different to personal life
What is ethical varies from one situation and society to another
Questions of what is ethical for everyone can never be resolvedsince what is moral or immoral is up to the individual.
My job as a computer professional is to provide the technicalsolutions (code or infrastructure), my managers will have…
My employer will protect me if anything goes wrong, so long asI've followed their rules.
As long as everyone is following "they are in it for themselves"society as a whole will prosper
Selfishness is the best guiding principle
If I'm operating within the law I don't need to worry about ethics
If it's legal it's ethical
agree
} Naïve legalism
} Naïve egoism
} Naïve agency
} Naïve relativism
} Naïve relativism in context
} Idealism
0 1 2 3 4
It is never necessary to sacrifice others
The existence of potential harm to others is always wrong,irrespective of the benefits to be gained
The dignity and welfare of people should be the most importantconcern in society
There is no room in business for soft things like ethics, if yourcompetitor does it then you can
Business is a special case, the ethics are different to personal life
What is ethical varies from one situation and society to another
Questions of what is ethical for everyone can never be resolvedsince what is moral or immoral is up to the individual.
My job as a computer professional is to provide the technicalsolutions (code or infrastructure), my managers will have…
My employer will protect me if anything goes wrong, so long asI've followed their rules.
As long as everyone is following "they are in it for themselves"society as a whole will prosper
Selfishness is the best guiding principle
If I'm operating within the law I don't need to worry about ethics
If it's legal it's ethical
disagree agree
0 1 2 3 4
It is never necessary to sacrifice others
The existence of potential harm to others is always wrong,irrespective of the benefits to be gained
The dignity and welfare of people should be the most importantconcern in society
There is no room in business for soft things like ethics, if yourcompetitor does it then you can
Business is a special case, the ethics are different to personal life
What is ethical varies from one situation and society to another
Questions of what is ethical for everyone can never be resolvedsince what is moral or immoral is up to the individual.
My job as a computer professional is to provide the technicalsolutions (code or infrastructure), my managers will have…
My employer will protect me if anything goes wrong, so long asI've followed their rules.
As long as everyone is following "they are in it for themselves"society as a whole will prosper
Selfishness is the best guiding principle
If I'm operating within the law I don't need to worry about ethics
If it's legal it's ethical
disagree agreeStudent Employer
• How can our Sustainable Lens be able to
operate on multiple scales of space and time
simultaneously?
• How can we develop systems that explicitly
account for both our ancestors and future
generations?
• To what extent will solutions need to be
tailored to individual situations?
• How can we to communicate across these
divides of understanding form an opportunity
for collaboration?
• How can support for the sustainable
practitioner adapt to changing
understandings?
• How can Sustainable Lens represent
uncertainty?
• How can Sustainable Lens support situations
where there is no single right answer?
• What is the nature of the complexity of
models and engagement with degree of
participation?
• How can Sustainable Lens encourage and
actively support sharing solutions and
understandings?
• How can we integrate and visualise data from
multiple sources across multiple scales of
space and time? What are the implications of
doing this in real time and in participatory
situations?
• To what extent should we expose the models
used?
• What are the requirements for a code of
• How might we begin to describe sustainability
in terms of patterns?
• How can Sustainable Lens provide engaging,
accessible and understandable interactions?
• How can Sustainable Lens allow people to
‘‘drill down’’ past the charisma (of the surface)
and access the back stories – the
researchers, management?
• How can open modelling frameworks
encourage an effective and efficient structure
for collaborative sharing, reusing and
critiquing of elements in a Sustainable Lens
worldview?
• How can Sustainable Lens use make use of
multiple understandings to improve
understanding?