Upload
stina14
View
110
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
TINA SResearch scholarDepartment of Forensic SciencePunjabi university,[email protected]
Friction ridge Identification
Contents
• What is Identification? • Friction ridge identification • Class and individual characteristics• Structure of ridged skin• Level 1 ,level 2 , level 3 Details • Ace-v• Conclusion• References
Identification
• To ascertain the origin, nature, or definitive characteristics.
• To associate or affiliate (oneself) closely with a person or group.
• Determined by a set parameter.
Fingerprint Identification
For almost a hundred years, the primary method used to examine prints was the point system. An examiner would compare the ridges in two prints, and if enough of the ridge points matched, anywhere from twelve to sixteen, then there was said to be an identification.
In the past ten years, there has been a shift away from the points system to the system known as “ridgeology”.1 An examiner must determine if there are enough features (not just points) in common to determine if two fingerprints are matches.
Possible features to consider in identification: Overall ridge pattern Individual ridge patterns (ridge ending, bifurcation, dot, etc.) Individual ridge structures (width, shape, position of pores, etc.) Other features present in a print, such as creases, scars, warts, etc.
FINGERPRINT CLASSIFICATION
CLASS CHARACTERSTIC INDIVIDUAL CHARACTERSTIC
Ridge pattern Ridge characterstics
LEVEL 1LEVEL 2LEVEL 3
Take a look at the sample fingerprint below to see several ridge characteristics that you might find during a fingerprint examination.
Crossover
Core
Bifurcation (fork)
Ridge ending
Island
Delta
Pore
Scar
COMPARISON POSSIBLE?
DEFINE TOLRANCE?
FRICTION RIDGE?
ANALYSIS
COMPARE
•MARK POSITIVE OR NEGETIVE?•SUBSTRATE?
•ANY MARK IN ANATOMICAL SEQUENCE?
• MARK MATRIX?•DEVELOPING MEDIUM?
•DISTORTION?•CLARITY?
•FEATURES VISIBLE?
A
COMAPRISON
AT LEVEL 1
AT LEVEL 3
EVALUATE
VERIFICATION
AT LEVEL 2
• SELECT REFRENCE POINT(ANY RECURVING REDGE,GROUP OF
MINUTE,TYPE LINES,SCARS WARTS)
• ARE THESE ON SAME ORIENTATION?
• ESTABLISH ROUTE OF FRICTION RIDGE
SELECT A VISIBLE FEATURE ON THE MARK?
IS IT PRESENT ON KNOWN ?
COMAPARE?
COMPARRISON
OSBORN GRID METHOD
SEYMOUR TRACE METHOD
PHOTOGRAPHIC STRIP METHOD
POLYGON METHOD
OVERLAY METHOD
OSTERBURG METHOD
MICROSCOPIC METHOD
CONVENTIONAL METHOD
Features required for identification?
• Historically ,for very first time was given by frenchman edmond locard.
• Locard suggested a tripartite rule1. More than 12 points than identity beyond doubts.2. If 8 to 12 then identity is to be considered with rarity of
the feature. presence of feature with respect to core and delta
3. Limited number of characteristic points are present then no certainty of identification but only presumption proportional to point available and clarity
Do you know???
• Why 12 points of comparison?why not 10, 9, 6 or more if one fingerprint contains 200 approx minutae
Answer
• As examining the whole universe to see whether any other individual have the same points or not is beyond scope .
• Just consider improbabity of these 12 points to conside in two individuals
Its is highly improbable.
Different numerical standards for different country
• Italy 16 -17
• U .k 16
• Germany/ 8-12
switzerland
• South africa 7
• Belgium 12
No predetermined numerical standard approach
• International association for identification studied and reviewed and concluded
1. Some type of minute more selective than other. for example
bifurcations and ridge ending -80% 2.Quantitative feature 3 level to be added in
identification process3. If no minutae around it is in its self source
of identity.
Identification
Qualitative • quantitative
Gerenal pattern
Type of minutae
Pores and edges
Number of minutae
VERIFICATION
• FINGERPRINT PROFESSION NEEDS TO BE OPERATED WITH AN ETHICAL AND UNBIASD CULTURE
1. Training
2. Continuous education for new researches
3. Appraisal systems
4. Peer review ,collaborative studies,proficency testing
Which will let us provide service not only with a say that we are presenting a service of 1000 years but of expertise itself.
1. Identification should not be done directly from comparison but analysis feature extraction enhancement
2. Note taking from analysis to verification.3. Proficiency testing and audits.
CONCLUSION
• Error in identification problem are not only due to failure to see the outside of the things, but failure to recognize their differences and their similarities
• And when we can see because of not able to recognize and interperate them.
• Science is merely accurate classification resulting from intelligent observationReasoning leading to correct recognition of similarity and dissimilarity
“knowledge is what necessary to ascertain resemblance and variation”Albert s osborn
References 1. David r ashbaugh;qualitative and quantitative friction ridge
analysis,crc press,19992. Champod christephore,pirre margot,mulutinstoilovic crc press
Fingerprint and other ridged skin3. James f.cowger;friction ;ridge skin CRC press london,19934. Gaensslen R.E,lee c henry;advances in fingerprint 2nd edition5. Albert S. Osborn;(1910) Questioned Documents 5. www.latentprint.com6. www.onin.com7. www.cplex.com8. www.forensic-evidence.com 9. www.ridges-furrows.com