25
www.kic-malta.com External Review ... a communications perspective Anthony F. Camilleri NAKVIS Seminar 24th November 2011

External Review: a communications perspective

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

The presentation, delivered at the NAKVIS seminar in Ljubljana, looks at the role of the external reviewer in a review process, and offers advice for communicating with the review team, the institution being reviewed and the quality assurance agency.The presentation is mainly focused on higher education quality reviews.

Citation preview

Page 1: External Review: a communications perspective

www.kic-malta.com

External Review

... a communications perspectiveAnthony F. Camilleri NAKVIS Seminar

24th November 2011

Anthony F. Camilleri
stuff to consider:-different types of communiction (with uni, with interviewees, with review team, with nakvis)- profile of reviewers- difference between an auditor and a reviewer- objective vs subjective?* not actually independent* best practice vs standard verification review- attitude?- types of evidence* sherlock holmes :-)* typology of criteria- report writing and recommendations
Page 2: External Review: a communications perspective

www.kic-malta.com

What‘s in a Name?Audit Expert-Review

objective Subjective

Precise standards Broad guidelines

verifies account of client Interprets account of client

standards-basedreview

Page 3: External Review: a communications perspective

www.kic-malta.com

A reviewer is a communicator

University

AgencyReview Team

Page 4: External Review: a communications perspective

www.kic-malta.com

Communicatingwith your team

Page 5: External Review: a communications perspective

www.kic-malta.com

What‘s in a name?

review team

a group of independent experts

vsa unitary entity with its own mind

Page 6: External Review: a communications perspective

www.kic-malta.com

Inter-subjectivity

• different subjective perceptions, taken from different viewpoints, give an objective view of reality

• the quality basis of an external review• requires consensus

consensus is not a diplomatic nicetybut an essential pre-requisite of quality

Page 7: External Review: a communications perspective

www.kic-malta.com

Requirements

• Know your team• Know their profiles• Know their inputs

• Discuss everything• Do not divide responsibility for

thought• Form a consensus • Before• During• After

Page 8: External Review: a communications perspective

www.kic-malta.com

Practical Actions

• Leave sufficient time for meetings at each stage

• Actively ask for team members‘ concerns

• Ensure each team member gets equal say

Page 9: External Review: a communications perspective

www.kic-malta.com

Communicatingwith the institution

Page 10: External Review: a communications perspective

www.kic-malta.com

Communication starts

• This is not a one-way exercise!– Has the institution told you enough to

allow a successful review?–What don‘t you understand, and who

can answer your questions?• Be active in schedule-design

with self-assessment!

Page 11: External Review: a communications perspective

www.kic-malta.com

Planning a Conversation

• ‚Get to know each-other‘• General discussion of role in

quality culture• Specific questions based on

report• Clarify all doubts

Page 12: External Review: a communications perspective

www.kic-malta.com

NEVER• get into conflict with your

interviewee• confuse the interviewee with the

institution• Issue judgments or opinions• leave the room with questions

unanswered• breach confidentiality

Page 13: External Review: a communications perspective

www.kic-malta.com

Demand RESPECT

• Self-assessment should be complete• All interviewees promised must attend

– even if review schedule changes• All questions must be answered in full• Any and all documents should be

provided• Logistical support should be provided

You are not a

court of law!

Page 14: External Review: a communications perspective

www.kic-malta.com

Communicatingwith the agency

Page 15: External Review: a communications perspective

www.kic-malta.com

„I don't know anything about art, but I know

what I like“

Gelett Burgess

Page 16: External Review: a communications perspective

www.kic-malta.com

„I don't know anything about the standards, but I know quality when I see

it“Unnamed reviewer

Page 17: External Review: a communications perspective

www.kic-malta.com

Standards of Proof• Some credible evidence• Preponderance of evidence• Clear and convincing evidence• Beyond reasonable doubt

Page 18: External Review: a communications perspective

www.kic-malta.com

In your Report• Be yourself

Bad: The institution showed....

Good: The review team saw / found / observed....

Page 19: External Review: a communications perspective

www.kic-malta.com

In your Report• Be specific

Good: The institution showed....

Better: The review team found multiple and consistent examples of

Page 20: External Review: a communications perspective

www.kic-malta.com

In your Report• Say what you know

Bad: The institution lied....

Good: The review team found inconsistencies between evidence (x) and interview (y)

Page 21: External Review: a communications perspective

www.kic-malta.com

In your Report• Give your opinion (where relevant)

Bad: The institution is... / or NOTHING

Good: We suspect, It seems likely that, Given the evidence available, etc...

Page 22: External Review: a communications perspective

www.kic-malta.com

In your Report• Give your reasoning

Bad: There is no quality.

Good: When we consider (X), (Y) and (Z), we find it impossible to say there is quality

Page 23: External Review: a communications perspective

www.kic-malta.com

In your Report• Link Effect with Cause

Bad: Quality systems are in place, but there is no evidence of iterative improvement.

Good: Quality systems are not effective, due to lack of iterative improvement procedures.

Page 24: External Review: a communications perspective

www.kic-malta.com

In your Report• Be CLEAR

Bad: The physical conditions of classrooms are in need of improvement.

Good: Classrooms are in a dismal state – no heating, broken desks and no boards make it impossible to learn

Page 25: External Review: a communications perspective

www.kic-malta.com

Hvala!Thank-you for your attention

Questions?

Anthony F. Camilleri ([email protected])Presentation available from: http://www.slideshare.net/anthonycamilleri/

Released under a Creative Commons Attribution ShareAlike 3.0 Slovenia License

You are free:• to Share — to copy, distribute and

transmit the work• to Remix — to adapt the work

Under the following conditions:Attribution — You must attribute the work in the manner specified by the author or licensor (but not in any way that suggests that they endorse you or your use of the work).Share Alike — If you alter, transform, or build upon this work, you may distribute the resulting work only under the same or similar license to this one.