Every Learner Counts V3

Joint Information Systems Committee 13/04/23 | Supporting education and research | Slide 1

Every Learner CountsCan technology help improve student motivation and retention?

Joint Information Systems Committee Supporting education and research

Joint Information Systems Committee

Every Learner Counts: can technology help improve student motivation and retention?

Paul BaileyJISC Programme Manager

13/04/23 | Supporting education and research | Slide 2


Overview and Introductions Student Retention - background

Admissions – technology supported admissions process

Targeted Retention Systems – technology to indentify at risk learners

The role of new technologies in supporting student motivation

– Lucy Stone, Leicester College

– Hesan Yousif, University of Sussex

– Dr Nicola Whitton, Manchester Metropolitan University

Discussion – can technology help improve student motivation and retention? Is there a simple cost benefit argument for investing in technologies to improve student retention….


Student Retention: Why Every Learner Counts Cost per learner lost….

The National Audit Office Report (Feb 2008)

– Loss of income for institutions (vs cost of support)

– Loss of income for Govt (in higher taxes)

– Funding council investment (for WP and retention)

– Worse at bottom than top…

Population shifts 18-20 group (down 85,000+ by 2020)

Credit Crunch?

http://www.flickr.com/photos/goodimages/1446527479/


Student Retention: NOA Recommendations

Use Management Information Data

Institutional strategic commitment

Student commitment

Academic support

Broaden options for learning

Specialist support

http://www.flickr.com/photos/melekalikimaka/2380330355

http://www.flickr.com/photos/30834803@N08/3216218210

http://www.flickr.com/photos/goodimages/1446527479/


Provisos… Student Retention is relatively high compared with rest of world (NAO

Report) – Completion of 3 year degree 78+% (many 90+%)

From IMS LTAC Project Group: Targeted Retention Systems (TRS)

– The average four-year institution in the United States graduated 57% of its students in 6 years (Horn, 2007).

– Only about 20% of community college students complete a degree in 3 years.

Technology is not the only answer – many institutions have systems and processes in place to support learners etc. meeting recommendations of 2008 NOA report)

http://www.flickr.com/photos/jarrellg/2404248265/sizes/l


Admissions – technology supported admissions process

UCAS already provides extensive statistical data for institutions (very sensitive to change – cause and effect)

Technologies to support direct entry routes to HE and FE

– LLNs – course discovery, IAG to support admissions,

Projects promoting fair and transparent admissions

– Better course information available – matching individual and course profiles

– e-Portfolio, supporting the admissions process (e.g. Nottingham 14-19)

UCAS pilot electronic feedback on unsuccessful applicants (to schools and individuals


Targeted Retention Systems – technology to indentify at risk learners

Targeted retention systems consist of processes and systems to:

1) Identify students at risk of not completing a unit of study (early warning system);

2) Notify at-risk students and relevant stakeholders (early alert systems);

3) Discover the most effective interventions for at-risk students;

4) Deliver targeted interventions;

5) Measure effectiveness of interventions in terms of impact on course and program completion.

Learning Technology Advisory Council Project Group: Targeted Retention Systems http://www.imsproject.org/ia.html


Question

What is your experience of technologies supporting learner retention?

2 minutes speaking to the people next to you.

http://www.flickr.com/photos/george53/1049051049


The role of new technologies in supporting student motivation

Lucy Stone, Leicester College – Supporting Work Based Learners in Further Education

Hesan Yousif, University of Sussex -

Dr Nicola Whitton, Manchester Metropolitan University – Alternative Reality Gaming


Discussion

Can technology help improve student motivation and retention?

– Question to presenters/panel members

– Examples/issues from the audience

– Does your institution invest enough in processes and technologies to support student retention and motivation?

If there is a simple cost benefit argument for investing in technologies to improve student retention, where should it be

A. Improving admissions (i.e. support pre-entry)

B. Target retention systems (early detection)

C. Investing in staff to improve student motivation (personal touch)

http://www.flickr.com/photos/george53/1049051049


Contact Details

Paul Bailey [email protected]

http://www.jisc.ac.uk/elearning

Hesan Yousif, University of Sussex, [email protected]

Lucy Stone, Leicester College, [email protected]

Dr Nicola Whitton, [email protected]