12
EVALUATION OF NON FORMAL EDUCATION 1

evaluation of non formal education

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: evaluation of non formal education

EVALUATION OF NON FORMAL EDUCATION

1

Page 2: evaluation of non formal education

SIGNIFICANT OF EVALUATIONACCORDING TO GOOLER (1979) “EVALUATION IS THE DETERMINATION OF THE WORTH OF THE PROGRAMME.”→ A METHOD OF MEASURING, PROJECT EFFORTS, EFFICIENCY AND EFFECTIVENESS .→ PROVIDES FACTS FOR PROVIDING INFORMATION ON THE ACHIEVEMENT AND GOALS RELATIVE TO EFFORTS, EFFECTIVENESS AND EFFICIENCY. →PROVIDE A QUANTITY OF PROGRAMME ACTIVITIES.

2

Page 3: evaluation of non formal education

CONTD.→ IT DETERMINES THE RELATIVE COSTS OF ACHIEVING THE RESULTS →IT LOOKS AT THE STRATEGIES → IT MEASURES THE PROGRESS → EVALUATION IS A CONTINUOUS PROGRAMME → EVALUATION EXPOSES THE MISTAKES AND DIFFICULTIES → IT THROWS SOME LIGHT ON HOW TO IMPLEMENT FUTURE PLANS → EVALUATION HELPS IN MINIMIZING WASTAGE OF MANPOWER, EFFORTS, TIME AND MONEY

3

Page 4: evaluation of non formal education

FUNCTIONS OF EVALUATION1. THE FORMATIVE FUNCTION FOR IMPROVEMENT2. THE SUMMATIVE FUNCTION FOR SELECTION, CERTIFICATION OR ACCOUNTABILITY3. THE PSYCHOLOGICAL OR SOCIO-POLITICAL FUNCTION FOR MOTIVATION TO INCREASE AWARENESS4. THE ADMINISTRATIVE FUNCTION TO EXERCISE 

4

Page 5: evaluation of non formal education

EVALUATION OBJECTS(I) STUDENTS(II) SCHOOL PERSONAL (TEACHERS AND ADMINISTRATORS)(III) CURRICULA AND INSTRUCTIONAL MATERIALS(IV) EDUCATIONAL PROGRAMME AND PROJECTS(V) EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTION AND ORGANIZATION

5

Page 6: evaluation of non formal education

TYPES OF EVALUATION1. PRE-EVALUATION2. FORMATIVE EVALUATION 3. SUMMATIVE EVALUATION TECHNIQUES OF EVALUATION1. THE OUTCOMES OF TEACHING2. THE LEARNING BEHAVIOR OR EXPERIENCES OF PUPILS THAT THE TEACHING PROVIDES3. THE BEHAVIOR OF THE TEACHER WHILE TEACHING

6

Page 7: evaluation of non formal education

STEPS OF EVALUATION1. THE STANDARD TASKS:

(I) DEMONSTRATE POSSESSION ON ABILITY

(II) DEMONSTRATE APPROPRIATE ELEMENTS IN A PERFORMANCE FROM INAPPROPRIATE ONES AS A BASIS FOR SCORING THE PERFORMANCE

(III) FINALLY THE TASKS SET FOR ALL CANDIDATES MUST BE EITHER IDENTICAL OR

EQUIVALENT SO THAT DIFFERENCES IN THE QUALITY OF PERFORMANCE WILL NOT ARISE BECAUSE ALL DIFFERENCES IN TASKS.

7

Page 8: evaluation of non formal education

CONTD. 2. THE DOCUMENTARY RECORD3. SCORING KEY

WRITING OF EVALUATION REPORT1. INTRODUCTION2. THE EVALUATION PROCEDURE

- OBJECTIVES - THE SAMPLE CHOSEN- THE METHODOLOGY

8

Page 9: evaluation of non formal education

CONTD.3. DATA ANALYSIS AND INTERPRETATION4. THE IMPLICATION DRAWN FROM THE FINDINGS AND THE RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE EVALUATOR.FOLLOWING ARE ALSO INCLUDED IN THE REPORT.A. INTRODUCTIONB. GOALS, AIMS AND OBJECTIVESC. TIMING AND DURATIOND.TARGET POPULATIONE. JUSTIFICATION OF THE PROJECTF. SCOPE OF THE PROJECTG. INPUTS AND OUTPUTS

9

Page 10: evaluation of non formal education

CONTD.H. IMPORTANT ASSUMPTIONSI. PREPARATIONS FOR IMPLEMENTATIONJ. IMPLEMENTATION OF THE PROJECTK. PROBLEMS AND CONSTRAINTSL. CONCLUSIONS, SUGGESTIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONSM.COSTS OF THE PROJECTN. APPENDIX

10

Page 11: evaluation of non formal education

CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS (GIVE IT BY UR OWN SELF)

11

Page 12: evaluation of non formal education

12