7
@ IJTSRD | Available Online @ www ISSN No: 245 Inte R Evaluation of morpholog Decalepis ha region Na Department of Botany ABSTRACT Decalepis hamitonii Wight & Arn collected from 5 accessions [i.e., B Bidadi, Devarayanadurga, Kyata Savanadurga] and analyzed for morp anatomical features. The plant exhibite which is sticky in nature, slightly thicke to that of latex obtained from the Asclepiadacaeae and Moraceae. T morphology of the shrub revealed an w liana which produced roots that were nature. One of the interesting feature in Decal Wight & Arn i.e., stout roots without l were presence of mucilagenous fluid sticky. The root exhibited variation odour which was not detected in other genera., ex: Hemidesmus indicus (L.) possess pubescent odour. Leaves obov obtuse, base wedge shaped which was character of Decalepis hamitonii Wigh flowers were trichotomously branched cyme., floral tube just minute with of Unlike the altered varieties resemble species of Hemidesmus as well. The Decalepis hamitonii Wight & Arn condition incured heavy loss or morphological features due to climatic c Study of the characters of Decalepis ha & Arn was instantly carried out and ana that maintainence and protection of w.ijtsrd.com | Volume – 2 | Issue – 4 | May-Jun 56 - 6470 | www.ijtsrd.com | Volum ernational Journal of Trend in Sc Research and Development (IJT International Open Access Journ gical and anatomical character amiltonii wight & arn. In select ns of Southern Karnataka aveen Kumar. S. P 1 , Maya. C 2 1 Research Scholar, 2 Professor y, Bangalore University, Bangalore, Karnataka, plants were Bannerughatta, asandra and phlogical and ed milky latex er as compared members of The external woody climber/ e pubescent in lepis hamitonii latex but there d which was in pubescent r families and )R.Br. do not vate, leaf apex s a significant ht & Arn and d with solitary 1 mm length. ed with those cultivation of n in in-vivo r change in conditions . amitonii Wight alysis revealed wild varieties along with respective charact in morphology can be done. Keywords: Decalepis hami pubescent, mucilagenous Asclepiadaceae INTRODUCTION Decalepis hamiltonii Wight Asclepiadaceae) Vernacular name: San: Sarib Makali beru, Magali beru; Ma Kizhangu, Mavilinga kilang Neemam theega (chenchu tr (Prajapati et al , 2003) . A large hairless extensively contains sticky milky latex. B angled and with swollen no leaves and the leaf nerves greenish pink and hairless. shaped to round shaped, ab gradually tapering to trunca rounded, margin entire to wav long. Flowers yellow, small 3 3-times branched cymes. oblong, about 5 x 3 cm and w many, egg-shaped, about 6 x silky hairs (Prajapati et al , 2003). The species is endemic to Pe been recorded in the dry and of Karnataka (Hassan, Mys n 2018 Page: 1234 me - 2 | Issue 4 cientific TSRD) nal rs on growth of ted India teristics without change itonii Wight & Arn., fluid, trichotomously, t & Arn. : (Family: ba, Shweta sariva; Kan: al: Nannari; Tam: Mahali gu, peru nannari; Tel: ribes), Maredu geddalu creeping woody liana Branches jointed, slightly odes. Young branchlets, s are shiny. Distinctly Leaves opposite, egg- bout 7 x 5 cm, base ate, apex sub-acute to vy; leaf stalks about 1 cm 3mm across, arranged in Follicles cylindrically woody when dry. Seeds 4 mm, with long white eninsular India. It is has moist deciduous forests sore, Bellary, Tumkur,

Evaluation of morphological and anatomical characters on growth of Decalepis hamiltonii wight & arn. In selected regions of Southern Karnataka

  • Upload
    ijtsrd

  • View
    12

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Decalepis hamitonii Wight and Arn plants were collected from 5 accessions i.e., Bannerughatta, Bidadi, Devarayanadurga, Kyatasandra and Savanadurga and analyzed for morphlogical and anatomical features. The plant exhibited milky latex which is sticky in nature, slightly thicker as compared to that of latex obtained from the members of Asclepiadacaeae and Moraceae. The external morphology of the shrub revealed an woody climber liana which produced roots that were pubescent in nature. One of the interesting feature in Decalepis hamitonii Wight and Arn i.e., stout roots without latex but there were presence of mucilagenous fluid which was sticky. The root exhibited variation in pubescent odour which was not detected in other families and genera., ex Hemidesmus indicus L. R.Br. do not possess pubescent odour. Leaves obovate, leaf apex obtuse, base wedge shaped which was a significant character of Decalepis hamitonii Wight and Arn and flowers were trichotomously branched with solitary cyme., floral tube just minute with of 1 mm length. Unlike the altered varieties resembled with those species of Hemidesmus as well. The cultivation of Decalepis hamitonii Wight and Arn in in vivo condition incured heavy loss or change in morphological features due to climatic conditions. Study of the characters of Decalepis hamitonii Wight and Arn was instantly carried out and analysis revealed that maintainence and protection of wild varieties along with respective characteristics without change in morphology can be done. Naveen Kumar. S. P | Maya. C "Evaluation of morphological and anatomical characters on growth of Decalepis hamiltonii wight & arn. In selected regions of Southern Karnataka" Published in International Journal of Trend in Scientific Research and Development (ijtsrd), ISSN: 2456-6470, Volume-2 | Issue-4 , June 2018, URL: https://www.ijtsrd.com/papers/ijtsrd14132.pdf Paper URL: http://www.ijtsrd.com/biological-science/botany/14132/evaluation-of-morphological-and-anatomical-characters-on-growth-of-decalepis-hamiltonii-wight-and-arn-in-selected-regions-of-southern-karnataka/naveen-kumar-s-p

Citation preview

Page 1: Evaluation of morphological and anatomical characters on growth of Decalepis hamiltonii wight & arn. In selected regions of Southern Karnataka

@ IJTSRD | Available Online @ www.ijtsrd.com

ISSN No: 2456

InternationalResearch

Evaluation of morphological and anatomical characters on growth ofDecalepis hamiltonii

regions of Southern Karnataka

Naveen Kumar.

Department of Botany, Bangalore University, Bangalore

ABSTRACT Decalepis hamitonii Wight & Arn plants were collected from 5 accessions [i.e., Bannerughatta, Bidadi, Devarayanadurga, Kyatasandra and Savanadurga] and analyzed for morphlogical and anatomical features. The plant exhibited milky latex which is sticky in nature, slightly thicker as coto that of latex obtained from the members of Asclepiadacaeae and Moraceae. The external morphology of the shrub revealed an woody climber/ liana which produced roots that were pubescent in nature. One of the interesting feature in Decalepis hamiWight & Arn i.e., stout roots without latex but there were presence of mucilagenous fluid which was sticky. The root exhibited variation in pubescent odour which was not detected in other families and genera., ex: Hemidesmus indicus (L.)R.Br. do notpossess pubescent odour. Leaves obovate, leaf apex obtuse, base wedge shaped which was a significant character of Decalepis hamitonii Wight & Arn and flowers were trichotomously branched with solitary cyme., floral tube just minute with of 1 mmUnlike the altered varieties resembled with those species of Hemidesmus as well. The cultivation of Decalepis hamitonii Wight & Arn condition incured heavy loss or change in morphological features due to climatic conditions Study of the characters of Decalepis hamitonii& Arn was instantly carried out and analysis revealed that maintainence and protection of wild varieties

@ IJTSRD | Available Online @ www.ijtsrd.com | Volume – 2 | Issue – 4 | May-Jun 2018

ISSN No: 2456 - 6470 | www.ijtsrd.com | Volume

International Journal of Trend in Scientific Research and Development (IJTSRD)

International Open Access Journal

Evaluation of morphological and anatomical characters on growth ofecalepis hamiltonii wight & arn. In selected

regions of Southern Karnataka

Naveen Kumar. S. P1, Maya. C2 1Research Scholar, 2Professor

Department of Botany, Bangalore University, Bangalore, Karnataka, India

Arn plants were collected from 5 accessions [i.e., Bannerughatta, Bidadi, Devarayanadurga, Kyatasandra and Savanadurga] and analyzed for morphlogical and anatomical features. The plant exhibited milky latex

sticky in nature, slightly thicker as compared to that of latex obtained from the members of

raceae. The external of the shrub revealed an woody climber/

liana which produced roots that were pubescent in

Decalepis hamitonii Wight & Arn i.e., stout roots without latex but there were presence of mucilagenous fluid which was sticky. The root exhibited variation in pubescent odour which was not detected in other families and

(L.)R.Br. do not possess pubescent odour. Leaves obovate, leaf apex obtuse, base wedge shaped which was a significant

Wight & Arn and flowers were trichotomously branched with solitary

of 1 mm length. varieties resembled with those

as well. The cultivation of Wight & Arn in in-vivo

cured heavy loss or change in morphological features due to climatic conditions.

Decalepis hamitonii Wight & Arn was instantly carried out and analysis revealed

maintainence and protection of wild varieties

along with respective characteristics without change in morphology can be done. Keywords: Decalepis hamitonii Wight pubescent, mucilagenous fluid, trichotomously, Asclepiadaceae INTRODUCTION Decalepis hamiltonii Wight & Arn. Asclepiadaceae) Vernacular name: San: Sariba, Shweta sariva; Kan: Makali beru, Magali beru; Mal: Nannari; Tam: Mahali Kizhangu, Mavilinga kilangu, peru nannari; Tel: Neemam theega (chenchu tribes), Maredu geddalu(Prajapati et al , 2003).

A large hairless extensively creeping woody liana contains sticky milky latex. Branches jointed, slightly angled and with swollen nodes. Young leaves and the leaf nerves are shiny. Distinctly greenish pink and hairless. Leaves opposite, eggshaped to round shaped, about 7 x 5 cm, base gradually tapering to truncate, apex subrounded, margin entire to wavy; leaf stalks about 1long. Flowers yellow, small 3mm across, arranged in 3-times branched cymes. Follicles cylindrically oblong, about 5 x 3 cm and woody when dry. Seeds many, egg-shaped, about 6 x 4 mm, with long white silky hairs (Prajapati et al , 2003).

The species is endemic to Peninsular India. It is has been recorded in the dry and moist deciduous forests of Karnataka (Hassan, Mysore, Bellary, Tumkur,

Jun 2018 Page: 1234

www.ijtsrd.com | Volume - 2 | Issue – 4

Scientific (IJTSRD)

International Open Access Journal

Evaluation of morphological and anatomical characters on growth of selected

, Karnataka, India

acteristics without change

Decalepis hamitonii Wight & Arn., pubescent, mucilagenous fluid, trichotomously,

Wight & Arn. : (Family:

Vernacular name: San: Sariba, Shweta sariva; Kan: Makali beru, Magali beru; Mal: Nannari; Tam: Mahali

, Mavilinga kilangu, peru nannari; Tel: Neemam theega (chenchu tribes), Maredu geddalu

A large hairless extensively creeping woody liana contains sticky milky latex. Branches jointed, slightly angled and with swollen nodes. Young branchlets, leaves and the leaf nerves are shiny. Distinctly greenish pink and hairless. Leaves opposite, egg-shaped to round shaped, about 7 x 5 cm, base gradually tapering to truncate, apex sub-acute to rounded, margin entire to wavy; leaf stalks about 1 cm long. Flowers yellow, small 3mm across, arranged in

times branched cymes. Follicles cylindrically oblong, about 5 x 3 cm and woody when dry. Seeds

shaped, about 6 x 4 mm, with long white

endemic to Peninsular India. It is has been recorded in the dry and moist deciduous forests of Karnataka (Hassan, Mysore, Bellary, Tumkur,

Page 2: Evaluation of morphological and anatomical characters on growth of Decalepis hamiltonii wight & arn. In selected regions of Southern Karnataka

International Journal of Trend in Scientific Research and Development (IJTSRD) ISSN: 2456-6470

@ IJTSRD | Available Online @ www.ijtsrd.com | Volume – 2 | Issue – 4 | May-Jun 2018 Page: 1235

Kolar) (Fig: 1 -5), Andhra Pradesh (Kurnool, Chittoor, Nellore, Anantpur, Cuddapah) and Tamil Nadu (Chengalpattu, Coimbatore, Dharmapuri, Nilgiri) (Prajapati et al , 2003).

It grows in rocky slopes and rocky crevices of dry to moist deciduous forests. It can be propagated by seeds, stem cuttings and root suckers. The roots are of medicinal properties. It contains quercetin, kaempferol, coumarin and rutin, lupeol, β-amyrin, 2-hydroxy, 4-methoxy benzaldehyde and ferulic acid. Tuberous roots of Decalepis are used as a cooling agent and blood purifier, hence used to prepare refreshing drinks. Indigestion, deficient digestive power, dysentery, cough, bronchitis, leucorrhoea, uterine hemorrhage, skin diseases, fever, thirst, vomiting, poisoning, chronic rheumatism, anemia, debility, dysuria and blood diseases can be cured by root extracts of Decalepis hamiltonii Wight & Arn(Prajapati et al , 2003) (Fig: 7 -13).

In the present study, various characters viz., morphological, anatomical and pharmacognostic, histochemical evaluation etc. was conducted to access the variation in different accessions of Decalepis hamiltonii Wight & Arn.

MATERIALS AND METHODS:

1. Morphological studies:

Fresh plant material were subjected for morphological studies, the growth parameters of the fullfledged

development of the root, stem, leaf, inflorescence, flower, fruit and seed of Decalepis hamiltonii Wight & Arn was recorded and their characteristics were analyzed for a duration of three consequitive years from 2013 to 2016 (Fig: 7-13).

2. Anatomical studies:

Fresh plant material viz., root, stem, leaf, inflorescence, flower, fruit and seed of Decalepis hamiltonii Wight & Arn were sectioned and the anatomical details were studied (Fig: 14-19).

3. Taxonomic studies:

The characteristics of Decalepis hamiltonii Wight & Arn were observed in field studies as well as laboratory conditions to check the consistency of the growth. Further, the characteristics were assessed for family characters utilizing taxonomical keys from Gamble Flora (Fig: 1-5).

4. Pharmacognostic evaluation:

The powder of the shade dried samples viz., root, stem, leaf, inflorescence, flower, fruit and seed of Decalepis hamiltonii Wight & Arn were subjected to powder microscopy to check the component consistency (Fig: 20-25).

RESULTS: Table no: 1: Average of all the 12 months for 3 consequitive years, viz., measurement starting from 3 week old plants to 3 years (Rough estimation based on pot trial attributes) for every year from 2013-2016.

Decalepis hamiltonii Wight & Arn

Length (2013-2014) in cm

(for one year = average value)

Breadth (2014-2015) in cm

(for one year = average value)

Thickness (2015-2016) in cm

(for one year = average value) D1 D2 D3 D4 D5 Pot

trials

D1 D2 D3 D4 D5 Pot trials

D1 D2 D3 D4 D5 Pot trials

1. Root 18.0 18.5 17.0 19.9 20.0 13.5 3.5 2.0 2.5 2.9 3.0 1.4 7.0 4.0 5.0 5.8 6.0 5.0 2. Stem 30.5 38.0 25.0 22.0 39.0 24.5 2.0 2.5 1.5 1.9 2.0 2.0 4.0 5.0 3.0 2.8 4.0 2.2 3. Leaf 5.0 5.5 4.5 5.5 6.0 4.0 2.5 3.0 2.5 2.0 2.5 1.9 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.1 4. Inflorescence 3.0 2.5 3.0 2.5 2.5 2.0 2.0 1.5 2.0 1.5 1.5 1.0 0.5 0.6 0.5 0.6 0.6 0.4 5. Flower 1.0 1.5 1.8 1.5 1.6 0.8 0.5 0.9 0.6 0.4 0.6 0.3 0.2 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.1 6. Fruit 5.0 4.0 5.0 4.6 4.0 3.5 3.0 2.5 3.0 2.4 2.0 1.8 2.0 3.0 2.0 2.5 2.8 2.0 7. Seed 0.06 0.05 0.06 0.04 0.05 0.02 0.03 0.04 0.02 0.02 0.03 0.01 0.01 0.02 0.01 0.02 0.02 0.01

Page 3: Evaluation of morphological and anatomical characters on growth of Decalepis hamiltonii wight & arn. In selected regions of Southern Karnataka

International Journal of Trend in Scientific Research and Development (IJTSRD) ISSN: 2456-6470

@ IJTSRD | Available Online @ www.ijtsrd.com | Volume – 2 | Issue – 4 | May-Jun 2018 Page: 1236

Table No: 2: Criteria for measurement for the morphometric studies of Decalepis hamiltonii Wright & Arn.

Root Stem Leaf Inflorescence Flower Fruit Seed Length measured

from the base where shoot ends till the root apex.

measured from the base where root ends till the shoot apical meristem.

measured from the nodal region to leaf apex along with pedicel.

was measured from the peduncle to the apex.

measured from the peduncle end to the stigmatal apex of the flower.

measured from the apical end to the centre to the apical end.

measured from the micropylar region to the outer curve of the seed.

Breadth measured from the centre of the root till the epidermal edge in a sectional view.

measured from the centre of the stem till the epidermal edge in a sectional view.

measured from the midrib region tothe leaf blade at the centre of the leaf.

measured from the branched end to the apex.

measured from the central axis of the flower to the outer rim of the flower.

measured from central axis of the fruit to the outer rind if the fruit.

measured from central axis to the margin of the seed.

Thickness measured from one end to other passing through the centre on the central axis.

measured from one end to other passing through the centre on the central axis.

measured from the Adaxial end to Abaxial end.

measured from the mid region to the circumference end.

measured from the centre of the ovary to the outer rim petal of the flower.

measured from the anterior end to posterior end.

measured from dorsal surface to ventral surface.

Note: D1 = Bannerughatta D2 = Bidadi region D3 = Devarayanadurga region D4 = Kyatasandra region D5 = Savanadurga region

Page 4: Evaluation of morphological and anatomical characters on growth of Decalepis hamiltonii wight & arn. In selected regions of Southern Karnataka

International Journal of Trend in Scientific Research and Development (IJTSRD) ISSN: 2456-6470

@ IJTSRD | Available Online @ www.ijtsrd.com | Volume – 2 | Issue – 4 | May-Jun 2018 Page: 1237

FIGURES: 1-5 : REGIONS OF PLANT COLLECTION: Figure: 6: IN-VIVO CONDITION

Fig:1 : D1 = Bidadi region Fig:2: D2 = Bannerughatta region Fig:3: D3 = Devarayanadurga region

Fig:4: D4 = Kyatasandra region Fig:5: D5 = Savanadurga region Fig: 6 : Pot Trials FIGURES: 7 – 13: MORPHOLOGY OF Decalepis hamiltonii Wight & Arn

Fig: 7: ROOTS Fig: 8: STEM and LEAF Fig: 9: INFLORESCENCE

Fig: 10: FRUIT Fig:11: DEHISCED FRUIT Fig: 12: HAIRY SEEDS Fig:13: SEEDS WITHOUT HAIR

Page 5: Evaluation of morphological and anatomical characters on growth of Decalepis hamiltonii wight & arn. In selected regions of Southern Karnataka

International Journal of Trend in Scientific Research and Development (IJTSRD) ISSN: 2456-6470

@ IJTSRD | Available Online @ www.ijtsrd.com | Volume – 2 | Issue – 4 | May-Jun 2018 Page: 1238

FIGURES: 14-19: TRANSVERSE SECTIONS SHOWING CORTEX AND VESSELS

Fig: 14: CORTICAL CELLS Fig: 15: CORTEX Fig: 16 : XYLEM

Fig: 17: STEM Fig: 18: ROOT Fig:19: LEAF FIGURES: 20-25: PHARMACOGNISTIC STUDIES OF Decalepis hamiltonii Wight & Arn ROOT POWDER.

Fig: 20: PITTED VESSEL Fig: 21: CALCIUM OXALATE CRYSTAL Fig: 22: TANNIN

Fig: 23 :STOMATA Fig: 24: SPIRAL VESSEL Fig: 25: PHLOEM PARENCHYMA

Page 6: Evaluation of morphological and anatomical characters on growth of Decalepis hamiltonii wight & arn. In selected regions of Southern Karnataka

International Journal of Trend in Scientific Research and Development (IJTSRD) ISSN: 2456-6470

@ IJTSRD | Available Online @ www.ijtsrd.com | Volume – 2 | Issue – 4 | May-Jun 2018 Page: 1239

DISCUSSION: From the present studies, it was evident that though the growth rate of Decalepis hamiltonii Wight & Arn varies from one region to another irrespective of the climatic conditions. A similar work carried out by Henderson et al (2006) on palm systematics stated that the data used in traditional morphometric studies of palms were morphological or anatomical and was collected from herbarium specimens and that often data were taken directly from living plants. Kapla et al (2012) in their work indicated the same protocols standardized for character acronyms through the morphometric studies in Potamogeton compressus L. which may be comparable to the present morphological studies on Decalepis hamiltonii Wight & Arn. In the present investigation, a cross study of the taxonomical characters of Decalepis hamiltonii Wight & Arn was carried out to check the pharmacognistic character and anatomical study, which was quite different to the analysis carried out by Reddy et al (2018) on Terminalia arjuna flowers and anatomical features were elucidated through Camera lucida studies. According to Sharma et al (2014) the roots of D. hamiltonii Wight & Arn come to maturity in about 12-14 months after planting depending upon the soil and climatic conditions. CONCLUSION: From all the observations its evident that, Decalepis hamiltonii Wight & Arn can be classified under the

Kingdom: Plantae, Super-Class: Dicotyledonae, (presence of two cotyledons formed in mature state) www.wikipedia.com Class: Magnolidae, (usually unfused carpels are surrounded by many petals or none). Order: Gentianales, (have simple leaves that are opposite or whorled viz., two or more per node and the leaves are usually accompanied by stipules viz., small leaflike appendages at the base of the leaves, that are reduced to a ridge on the stem inbetween adjacent leaf stalks) (www.britanica.com). From previous studies: Decalepis hamiltonii Wight & Arn belonged to:

Family: Apocyanaceae, (The milkweed family includes annual plants, perennial herbs, stem succulents, woody shrubs, trees, or twines. Most of them exude a milky sap with latex, if injured. Leaves are present alternating on the stem, but usually occur in pairs or in whorls, they are present on opposite sides of the stem. Stipules are small and have radial symmetry and are borne on heads that are cymes or racemes, but are rarely fasciculate or solitary. Flowers are bisexual, with a synsepalous, five-lobed calyx united into a tube at the base. Inflorescences are terminal or axillary. Five petals are united into a tube with four or five epipetalous stamens. The style is expanded at the apex into a massive clavuncle just below the stigma. The ovary is usually superior, bicarpellary, and apocarpous, with a common fused style and stigma. The fruit is a drupe, a berry, a capsule, or a follicle (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apocynaceae) Sub-family: Periplacoideae, pollen grains are granular, arranged in tetrads and translators are spoon or funnel shaped. (www.biologydiscussion.com). But from present studies: Decalepis hamiltonii Wight & Arn exhibits all the characters more similar to Family: Apocynaceae, (The leaves are simple, opposite decussate in arrangement with whorled phyllotaxy; stipules remain absent, flowers bisexual and actinomorphic, rarely zygomorphic. Calyx synsepalous, corolla sympetalous and both are penta-lobed, Stamens distinct andequivalent to the number of corolla lobes that alternate with them, adnate to the corolla tube (or perigynous zone). Anthers are introrse, commonly adherent to the stigmatic surface. Gynoecium: carpels-2 distinct at the level of the superior or inferior ovary but are united to form single style. Fruit is a follicle, capsule or berry and the seeds are flat, winged with a tuft of hairs on one end. (www.botany.hawaii.edu). Genus: Decalepis Species: hamiltonii Wight & Arn. Even the pharmacognostic features procure strongly that the plant belongs to Apocynaceae rather than affinities towards Asclepiadaceae. Moreover the anatomical details revealed that the formation secondary phloem was in connection with the xylary elements and the morphological characters display convincing results that possess more similarities with Apocynaceae than Asclepiadaceae.,

Page 7: Evaluation of morphological and anatomical characters on growth of Decalepis hamiltonii wight & arn. In selected regions of Southern Karnataka

International Journal of Trend in Scientific Research and Development (IJTSRD) ISSN: 2456-6470

@ IJTSRD | Available Online @ www.ijtsrd.com | Volume – 2 | Issue – 4 | May-Jun 2018 Page: 1240

Decalepis hamiltonii Wight & Arn collected from Bannerughatta had fulfleged growth (2012-2014) but it was not consistent in Devarayanadurga region. The plants collected from Bidadi possessed least pharmacognostic features than the others., anatomically the plant details were very distinct and co-ordinating with the original source of plants collected from Kyatsandra. Overall the Decalepis hamiltonii Wight & Arn grown in Tumkur district (Devarayanadurga and Kyatsandra regions) possessed least morphological features on an average than the Bangalore district (Bannerughatta and Bidadi regions) and typical interesting characteristics observed in Ramanagara district (Savanadurga region).

REFERENCES:

1) Prajapati, N. D., Purohit, S. S., Sharma, A. K., Kumar, T., (2003): A handbook of Medicinal Plants, Agrobios (India), Jodhpur.

2) www.britannica.com., https://www.britannica.com/plant/Magnoliid-clade.

3) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apocynaceae.

4) http://www.biologydiscussion.com/plants/flowering-plants/family-asclepiadaceae-quick-notes-botany/19638.

5) http://www.botany.hawaii.edu/faculty/carr/apocyn.htm

6) Henderson, A., (2006) Traditional morphometrics in plant systematics and its role in palm systematics., Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society, 151, 103–111.

7) Kapla, Z., Marhold, F. L. S. K., (2012): Multivariate morphometric analysis of the Potamogeton compressus group (Potamogetonaceae)., Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society, 170, 112–130.

8) Reddy, M.P., Shantha, T.R., Naveen Kumar, S.P.,

Rao, V.R., Shiddamallayya N., Bhat, S., (2018) : Pharmacognostical Evaluation of Arjuna Flowers: Terminalia Arjuna (Roxb.) Wight & Arn., Journal of Drug Research in Ayurvedic Sciences, 2 (4): 289-294.

9) Sharma, S., Anwar Shahzad, A., (2014): An Overview on Decalepis: A Genus of Woody Medicinal Climbers., J Plant Sci Res. ;1(1): 104.