Upload
michael-anderson
View
177
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
EduTools 2.0EduTools 2.0
EduTools 1.0
• Ground-breaking comparison tool
• Used for RFP generation
• Provider content vetted by WCET
• Resource-intensive to maintain
Genesis: WCET LMS CIG
Revision Drivers
• Ubiquitous
• Converging feature sets
• Handle administrivia
• Student expectations
• Focus on learning not learner management
• Constant change
Driving Questions
• Semi-permeable borders
– Content
– Non-students
• Personal learning environments
– Content
– Non-students
• Small pieces, loosely joined
EduTools Survey
1. Portal
2. Communication
3. Tests
4. Grades
5. Reports
6. Interoperability
7. Accessibility
8. Community
9. Administration
10.Technical
11.Price
LMS “Essential” QuestionsPortalHow enables students to connect with other enrolled students outside of the course?
CommunityHow used to make content available to users outside the institution?
CommunicationHow does the LMS allow faculty to manage small groups within courses.How can programmers develop integrated services (e.g. single sign-on for tutoring)
AssessmentWhat data is available to allow institutions to student progress on system-wide basis?
GradingDescribe how a faculty member imports and exports grades from your LMS.
DataHow can institutions use the LMS to monitor faculty participation in courses on a system-wide basis?
Accessibility
Compliance with W3C Content Accessibility?
How faculty upload content files to a single location for multiple sections of same course?
Administration
Describe the data feeds between any SIS integration partners to your LMS.
Technical
Describe any LMS migrations which have required no post-migration manual clean-up.
Pricing
Describe the TCO price for:
• small institution, 2,000 students, 100 staff/faculty members, single-CPU application server.
• medium-sized campus, 12,000 students, 500 staff/faculty, four-CPU application server.
EduTools Data
• LMS Filters
– Type
• Proprietary vs. Open Source
– Location
• Local vs. Hosted
LMS RespondentsProduct FilterAgilix BrainHoney Commercial Hosted (SaaS)
CampusCruiser Commercial Hosted (SaaS)
Instructure Canvas Commercial Hosted (SaaS)
Edvance 360 Commercial Hosted (SaaS)
Pearson eCollege Commercial Hosted (Saas)
Blackboard Learn Commercial Hosted or Unhosted
Desire2 Learn Commercial Hosted or Unhosted
ATutor Open Source
.LRN Open Source
LON-CAPA Open Source + Hosting
Moodle Open Source
Sakai Open Source
MoodleRooms Joule Open Source Hosting
Others available but did not participate in survey
Authentication “Essential” Questions
Functionality• What designed to do and how
does it do it? • Evidence the solution provides
reliable authentication?• User experience of faculty
members and of students?• Reports available to
admin, staff, faculty?• How student privacy assured?
Pricing• Pricing model?
Support• Skill sets needed to manage the
product?• Training and documentation
provided?• How user support provided?
Technology• Hardware purchases or software
downloads required of users?• Can campus systems (e.g.
LMS, SIS) be integrated?• Status of partnership with any
LMS providers?
EduTools Data
• Authentication Filter: Technology
– Biometric
– Challenge-Response
– Monitoring
Authentication RespondentsProduct FilterAxciom Identify-X Challenge Questions
BioMetric Signature ID Biometrics
Trustable Passwords by iMagic Software Biometrics
Voice Verified by CSIdentity Biometrics
Digital Proctor Monitoring
WebAssessor & Online Proctoring by Kryterion Monitoring
ProctorU Monitoring
Securexam by Software Secure Monitoring
EduTools Mockup
Direction
• Annual updates
• Additional resources
• Vendor input
• Community involvement
– Vetting
– Sharing
Future
Ed U Tools
2.0coming soon
End
RFP
PLE
Survey Questions
CommunicationsSteps
Communicators
Strategic
Planning
Decision Procure/
Upgrade
RFP and Vendor
Evaluation
Vendor Selection
Executive/ Steering
Committee
initiate overall direction,
change frequency
set direction for
procurement, purchasing
RFP shepherding oversee RFP, Legal, other
issues
Information Technology provide guidance on IT
infrastructure capabilities,
recommend window for
acquisition and integration
security & accessibility
evaluation
hardware decisions and
provisioning discussions
Academic Units provide guidance on
current/future usage
recommend window for
acquisition
develop evaluation criteria;
vendor research/reviews
identify evangelists to
begin the change process
Instructional Design
and Support
provide guidance on future
needs
propose evaluation criteria,
transition strategies
conduct evaluation by
instructional designers
develop transition schedule
Marketing and
communication
provide guidance on public
perceptions
get direction from
Academic Units and IT
sketch communications
plan/message consistency
provide communications
plan to stakeholders
Faculty and Faculty
Senates
provide feedback on
current limitations
propose evaluation criteria participate in evaluation prepare for change
Students or Student
Senate Organizations
provide feedback on
current limitations (users)
propose evaluation criteria participate in evaluation prepare for change
Enrollment Mgt/
Registrar
provide feedback on
current limitations
propose evaluation criteria participate in evaluation revise schedule and text
descriptions
Governing Bodies provide direction for
shared service needs
collaborate with Executive
Committee on issues
participate in evaluation,
determine community
Vendor none provide general info: RFI
helps frame RFP
provide specific info in
response to RFP
provide demonstrations,
references and test a/c’s