Upload
vida-joy-quimson
View
497
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
To attain the 2015 goal and targets of Education For All
Is the country needs toimplement policies
Presented by
VIDA JOY MQUIMSON
To attain the 2015 goal and targets of Education For All the country needs toimplement policies programs and projects that will address the needs of specificlearners particularly those belonging to the un-reached and under-served groups
A Explicit Articulation of Inclusive Education Policy and Substantial Increase inBudget Provision
First DepEd needs to explicitly articulate ldquoInclusive Educationrdquo as the overallpolicy and planning framework of EFA This policy will dictate how the curriculum will be delivered including the programs projects and resource requirements that will support the specific needs of particular groups of learners One of the policies thatDepEd will be issuing soon is the institutionalization of Alternative Delivery ModePrograms that will cater to learners in difficult and different circumstances and which will use self-learning modules
Second the government should take comprehensive but concrete actions toaddress the inadequate use of the budget for basic education Specifically the government should consider the following in coming-up with a financing strategy for EFA
1048707 underinvestment in basic education (only 24 percent of the GDP) about85 percent of DepEdrsquos budget goes to salaries of personnel and1048707 inequitable distribution of limited national and local government resourcesespecially for capital outlay and operating costs due to some ldquoloopholesrdquo inexisting policies
The current inequitable distribution of resources will require the government toreview existing legislations and policies in allocating resources for schools in ruralareas to address the existing bias against rural schools Moreover there is a need torevisit the implementation of the law on ldquoGovernment Assistance to Students andTeachers in Private Educationrdquo to find out if the national government subsidy toprivate schools benefits the poor students and if the private schools produce betterquality outputs than the public schools
bull B Addressing the Socio-Economic and GeographicalGeophysical Factors that
bull Affect the attainment of Education For Allbull 143 The Philippine basic education system should be
flexible and responsive to thebull needs of learners as affected by non-school factors such
as
The Philippine basic education system should be flexible and responsive to theneeds of learners as affected by non-school factors such asa Economic Factors
1048707 The country is still dependent on agriculture fishing and forestry but at the same time an emerging global market for business process ICT spare parts medical services to name a few and this will require 51 DepEdrsquos implementation of a more relevant basic education curriculum in relation to local and global needs
Social Factors
1048707 The increasing percentage of school-age population requires thegovernment to effectively and efficiently implement fiscal reforms as thiswill have major implications in attaining the goal of education for all Inthis regard DepEd should actively participate in advocating for efficienttax revenue collection Moreover mobilization of resources from localgovernments private sector and other partners will also help thecountry finance the increasing budgetary requirements of EFA
Language and Cultural Factors With different ethnic and Muslim groups spread across country ndash
effective implementation of the curriculum indigenization policy and national curriculum for Muslim education is imperative
1048707 With more than 111 dialects spoken there is a need to revisit the current policy on medium of instruction effective nationwide implementation of the use of the mother tongue or the childrsquos language as medium for instruction in pre-school and the first two grades in the elementary level
Geographical and geophysical factors
1048707 Considering the huge size of the basic education system (over40000 public schools in 7107 islands) the applications of moderninformation and communication technology may offer the onlyfeasible medium for delivering high-quality instruction to millions oflearners in a large diverse and geographically dispersed population1048707 DepEd must seriously consider adopting a flexible school calendar ndasheg first three months of the school calendar (June to August) are the rainy months with frequent flooding in Metro Manila supervision of schools is very difficult and dangerous during the rainy and typhoon season
1048707 There is need to adopt differentiated designs for school facilities to withstand natural calamities such as typhoons and earthquakes
bull C Reaching the Un-reached and Underserved Groups of Learners
bull 144 Providing children in difficultdifferent circumstances access to quality and
bull relevant basic education is still a big challenge that the country should immediately
bull address To witbull bull Children Engaged in Labor DepEd needs to intensify
the implementation of itsbull distance learning program both for elementary and
secondary levels so thatbull schoolchildren who really need to work to earn a living
could still continuebull schooling even without regularly attending classes
bull bull Street Children
bull DepEd needs to establish a strong partnership with other
bull government agencies and other partners (NGOs privatebusiness sectorLGUs)
bull in providing basic education and other social and livelihood services to street children and their families (the main objective of the latter services is to sustain childrenrsquos schooling)
bull bull Children with Special Needs (Gifted and Differently-abled)
bull With the limited coverage of existing government educational facilities DepEd together with other agencies and partners need to work on the expansion of basic education services to reach more persons with disability DepEd should specifically work on
bull the strengthening and expansion of its SPED classes in the existing public
bull elementary and secondary schools and the strengthening and enrichment of its regular classes to mainstream the people with disabilities
(1990 or Level 2015 Attaining theMDG year closest (20022004) 1 Targets
to 1990) 2
Eradicate extreme poverty and hunger underweight among 0-5 yo children 345 276 1725 MediumAchieve universal primary education
Elementary participation rate 3 851 a 9005 100 MediumImprove maternal healthMaternal mortality rate 209 172 c 522 Medium
Increase access to RH servicesContraceptive prevalence rate 40 b 489 70 Medium
Achieve universal primary education
Elementary cohort survival rate 684 a 698 833 Low
Muslim Children With the big percentage (93) of Muslim school-age population in the public school system the effective implementation of the national curriculum for Muslim education in the public school system is verycritical The overall goal of the curriculum is to develop the core competencies of Muslim children in order for them to function effectively in society within thecontext of their environment and culture and that of the wider community In the long run it will hopefully effectively address the economic social political problems in Muslim-dominated areas and the entire country in general
bull Children in Conflict-Affected Areas Convergence of support for the protection ofchildren especially those who are not educated from being vulnerable targets fortraining and indoctrination as fighters There is also a need to execute acovenant among and between concerned parties to protect schools as ldquopeacezonesrdquo
In summary the country was not able to attain its 2005 targets in almost all key outcome indicators in Early Childhood Education Formal Basic Education and Alternative Learning System
Most of the regions have performance classified asldquofalling further behindrdquo or with performance lower than the national level in 2002 and continued to decline in 2005 While substantial investments were poured into the establishment of basic education facilities these were not enough to ensure that all3-5 year olds are in Early Childhood Education learning centers and all school-aged children were in school and able to continue and eventually complete basic education with satisfactory achievement level The basic education system should 53 be responsive to the differentiated needs of learners where a ldquoone-size fit allrdquo or conventional interventions (such as construction of classrooms provision of textbooks etc) are not enough or will no longer work
MDG attainment would requireEnhanced revenue generationLGU private sector and civil society supportPursuit of projects with high economic impactandTapping OFW remittances
Working towards achieving one Goal will make us closer to achievement of the rest amp would reduce costs of achieving othersrdquo Eveline Herfkens
SDC Res No 1 2003 ldquoExpanding
functions and composition of
MC-IHDCrdquo
DILG MC 2004-152 ldquoGuide to LGUs in the
Localization of the MDGsrdquo
MTPDP 2004-2010 hews
closely to the MDGs
Strong commitment
of the business
sector and civil society
Investment identification per goal and target in MTPIP
2005-2010
Strong support of
donor community
for the MDGs
Legislative support of Congress
Enabling Environment for the MDGs
Poverty Situation
FIGURE 1 Poverty Incidence of Population by Region 2003
Legend
Below national average (73 - 304)Above national average(305 - 542)
Source
NSO Family Income and Expenditures Survey 2003
ARMM 531
Cordillera Region 312
Metro Manila 73
Ilocos Region 302
Cagayan Valley 245
Central Luzon 177
CALABARZON 188
MIMAROPA 479
Bicol Region 484
Western Visayas 391
Central Visayas 284
Eastern Visayas 433
Western Mindanao 494
Northern Mindanao 443
Southern Mindanao 344
Central Mindanao 384
CARAGA 542
Annual Per Capita Poverty Threshold Poverty Incidence of Families and Population by Region 2000 and 2003
2000 Revised 2003 2000 Revised 2003 2000 Revised 2003Philippines 11 451 12 267 275 247 330 304NCR 15 693 16 796 57 50 76 73CAR 13 066 13 976 307 248 376 312Region I 12 685 13 276 294 244 351 302Region II 11 128 11 409 252 193 304 245Region III 13 760 14 342 173 137 214 177Region IV-A 13 657 14 616 152 149 191 188Region IV-B 11 995 12 406 363 397 452 479Region V 11 372 12 354 453 405 526 484Region VI 11 313 12 275 366 313 444 391Region VII 9 656 9 779 315 237 362 284Region VIII 9 518 10 802 375 355 451 433Region IX 9 116 10 414 385 441 448 494Region X 10 503 11 609 379 379 438 443Region XI 10 264 11 276 277 281 331 344Region XII 10 466 11 303 407 320 468 384Caraga 10 896 12 000 437 473 509 542ARMM 12 192 12 739 537 457 598 531
Poverty Incidenceof Population ()Region
Annual Per Capita PovertyThreshold (in Pesos)
Poverty Incidenceof Families ()
FIGURE 2 Subsistence Incidence of Population by Region 2003
Legend
Below national average Above national average
Source
NSO_Family and Income Expenditure Study 2003
ARMM 241
Cordillera Region 134
Metro Manila 06
Ilocos Region 112
Cagayan Valley 76
Central Luzon 42
CALABARZON 49
MIMAROPA 229
Bicol Region 266
Western Visayas 177
Central Visayas 146
Eastern Visayas 21
Western Mindanao 328
Northern Mindanao 254
Southern Mindanao 176
Central Mindanao 184
CARAGA 31
Annual Per Capita Food Threshold Subsistence Incidence of Families and Population by Region 2000 and 2003
2000 Revised 2003 2000 Revised 2003 2000 Revised 2003Philippines 7 707 8 134 123 104 158 138NCR 9 570 9 974 07 04 10 06CAR 8 744 9 117 137 98 179 134Region I 8 552 8 903 114 81 152 112Region II 7 560 8 026 93 56 118 76Region III 8 764 9 338 42 29 55 42Region IV-A 8 782 9 189 51 37 65 49Region IV-B 8 078 8 339 174 177 241 229Region V 8 047 8 372 233 203 293 266Region VI 7 983 8 386 174 129 231 177Region VII 6 759 7 016 169 112 207 146Region VIII 7 080 7 696 191 155 248 210Region IX 6 574 7 245 210 279 258 328Region X 7 296 7 999 192 197 238 254Region XI 7 087 7 751 128 135 167 176Region XII 7 235 7 804 179 140 226 184Caraga 7 667 8 353 244 245 307 310ARMM 8 313 8 737 239 186 285 241
RegionAnnual Per Capita Food Subsistence Incidence Subsistence Incidence
Threshold (in Pesos) of Families () of Population ()
FIGURE 3 Gini Concentration Ratios by Region 2003
Legend
Below National AverageAbove National Average
ARMM 03464
Cordillera Region 04294
Metro Manila 0413
Ilocos Region 03968
Cagayan Valley 04411
Central Luzon 03486
CALABARZON 04058
MIMAROPA 04354
Bicol Region 04648
Western Visayas 04392
Central Visayas 04711
Eastern Visayas 04577
Western Mindanao 05197
Northern Mindanao 04768
Southern Mindanao 04583
Central Mindanao 04567
CARAGA 04294
Gini Coefficient Among Families by Region 2000 and 2003
Region2000 2003 Change
Philippines 04822 04660 -16NCR 04451 04130 -32CAR 04439 04294 -15Region I 04071 03968 -10Region II 04227 04411 18Region III 03591 03486 -11Region IV-A 04086 04058 -03Region IV-B 04076 04354 28Region V 04455 04648 19Region VI 04594 04392 -20Region VII 04691 04711 02Region VIII 04807 04577 -23Region IX 04732 05197 47Region X 04794 04768 -03Region XI 04318 04567 25Region XII 04631 04583 -05Caraga 04118 04294 18ARMM 03171 03464 29
GINI
FIGURE 4 Percentage of Households with Less than 100 Energy Adequacy
FIGURE 5 Percentage of Underweight Children 0-5 Year Olds
Meeting Goal 1 Eradicate Extreme Poverty and Hunger
Priority Policies and Programs
bull Kapit-Bisig Laban sa Kahirapan (KALAHI)
bull Enrolment of 7 million beneficiaries under the National Health Insurance Program (NHIP)
bull Wholesale portfolio of the Peoplersquos Credit and Finance Corporation (PCFC)
bull Implementation of asset reform programs
bull Delivery of human development services
MDGs Amount
(in US$ million)
Share to Total MDG-
Related ODA
1 - Eradicate extreme poverty amp hunger 62594 7740
2 - Achieve universal primary education 5579 690
3 - Promote gender equality 38 005
4 - Reduce child mortality 1399 173
5 - Improve maternal health 1570 194
6 - Combat HIVAIDS malaria amp other diseases 253 031
7 - Ensure environmental sustainability 94331 1167
TOTAL 80866 10000
Summary of ODA for completed amp ongoing projects by MDG category from 2001-2005 in million US$
Source NEDA-PMS
ODA for MDGs
INVESTMENTS SUPPORTIVE OF THE MDGs 2005-2010
MDGs COST
(in PhP Billion)
1 - Eradicate extreme poverty amp hunger 129422 - Achieve universal primary education 5673 - Promote gender equality -4 - Reduce child mortality
6995 - Improve maternal health
6 - Combat HIVAIDS malaria amp other diseases
7 - Ensure environmental sustainability 19888 ndash Global partnership for development 1251
TOTAL 17447
Source NEDA-PIS
INTENSIFYING MULTISECTORAL PARTNERSHIP AND COLLABORATION
Government (executive legislature judicial)
Local Government
CSOsAcademe
Local Government
PrivateBusiness
Donor Community
Environmental Situationand Challenges
Goal 7 Ensure Environmental Sustainability
bull Forests resources and watersheds
bull Biodiversity resources
bull Coastal and marine resources
bull Air quality
bull Water resources
bull Waste and toxic chemicals
Area Proportion to Total
(Hectares) ()
7168400 100
2560872 36
Broadleaved 2448864
Mixed 24618
Coniferous 87390
4030588 56
Broadleaved 3847284
Mixed 69861
Coniferous 113443
247362 3
329578 5Source Forest Management Bureau (FMB)
Total Forest
Mangrove
Plantation
Forest Cover by Forest Type 2003
Closed Forest
Open Forest
Category
Area Reforested 1990-2003 (in hectares)Year Total
Government
Percent Non-Government
Percent
Sector
2003 15087 13195 875 1892 125
2002 25620 20682 807 4938 193
2001 31440 26524 844 4916 156
2000 27632 21740 787 5892 213
1999 42165 31183 74 10982 26
1998 42368 33219 784 9149 216
1997 66236 49301 744 16935 256
1996 46096 18869 409 27227 591
1995 65233 21841 335 43392 665
1994 49551 18032 364 31519 636
1993 19211 6347 33 12864 67
1992 40593 24304 599 16289 401
1991 93039 73602 791 19437 209
1990 191663 153949 803 37714 197
Annual Average
53995
Source DENR Annual Report
Biodiversity Resources
Philippineshellip one of the megadiverse countries in the
world higher regard for the endemism of local
species
buthellip most severely threatened of the
megadiverse countries
Coastal and Marine Resources rich sources of fish and aquatic products habitat for countless underwater wildlife natural areas for recreationtourism Water resourcesbull disparities in water supply coverage across regionsbull depletion of ground water especially in Metro
Manila and Metro Cebubull pollution of water sources
Air Qualitybull pollution remains a problem in Metro Manila and
major urban centersbull on the level of suspended particulates (TSP) air
quality is not within standards
Waste and Toxic Chemicalsbull solid waste generation in Metro Manila is estimated at
5345 tons per daybull urbanization inevitably increased the use of chemicalsbull no integrated treatment facility for hazardous waste
Priority Policies and Programs
bull Adoption of Sustainable Forest Management
bull Revised Forestry Code of the Philippines and the Watersheds Code
bull Various biodiversity acts
bull Fisheries Code and AFMA
bull Clean Air Act
Challenges and Priorities for Action
bull Sustainable and more productive utilization of natural resources
bull Focus and strengthen the protection of vulnerable and ecologically fragile areas
bull Create healthier environment for the populationbull Mitigate the occurrence of natural disasters bull Ensure environmental accountability for all
industries
CROSS-CUTTING CHALLENGEShellip
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005
Government Expenditure Program by Sector FY 2000-2005
Social Services Debt Service Economic Services General Public Services Defense
CROSSCUTTING CHALLENGES AND PRIORITIES FOR ACTION
Source DBM Budget of Expenditure and Sources of Financing
FINANCING THE MDGs
SectorYear 2001 2002 2003 2004
Economic Services 15982070 45484830 52853500 58700890
(15) (32) (33) (34)Social Services 28979110 26352690 34001700 36135990
(27) (19) (21) (21)General Public Services 63375820 69580140 73954470 78545740
(58) (49) (46) (45)Total Public Expenditures 108337000 141417660 160809670 173382620
FINANCING THE MDGs
Distribution of Public Expenditures by Local Government UnitsBy Sector 2001-2004 (in thousand pesos)
Source DBM Budget of Expenditure and Sources of Financing
CROSSCUTTING CHALLENGES AND PRIORITIES FOR ACTION
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
2001 2002 2003 2004
ODA Commitments by SectorFY 2001-2004 (US$ million)
Agriculture agrarianreform and naturalresources
Governance andinstitutionsdevelopment
Infrastructuredevelopment
Social reform anddevelopment
Industry and services
Source NEDA-PIS
CROSSCUTTING CHALLENGES AND PRIORITIES FOR ACTION
FINANCING THE MDGs
CROSS-CUTTING CHALLENGES AND
PRIORITIES FOR ACTIONbull Reduce disparities across regions
bull Increase resource allocation for MDG-related programs and projects
bull Enforce fullstricter implementation of laws amp ensure passage of MDG-supportive bills
bull Strengthen monitoring and implementation
bull Scale-up campaign for localization
bull Develop an advocacy plan
bull Intensify multisectoral partnership amp collaboration
Facilitating Factors bull Strong global support for MDGs by the United
Nations ASEAN and other multilateral organizations
bull Expanding national support among policymakers for MDGs (eg creation of the House Committee on MDGs issuance of EO on the MDGs)
bull Prioritization of MDGs in resource allocation (eg focusing of MTPIP investments on MDGs)
bull Increasing awareness and participation of private sector LGUs in MDG-related programs
Hindering Factors
bull Resource constraints (ie MDG financing gap of about $15 billion yearly)
bull Lack of support by creditors for the Debt for MDG ProjectsDebt for Equity in MDG Projects initiative
bull Low budgetary priority for MDGs accorded by some LGUs and
bull Lack of disaggregated data to monitor MDGs at local levels
Parallel Initiatives
Participation in the High-Level Plenary Meeting on MDGs
Formulation of the Plan of Action for Poverty Reduction (2006-2010)Enhance the current Poverty Reduction
Strategy and Program Framework
Advocacy for the Philippine proposal on Debt for Equity in MDG Projects
Implications on the Philippine Economy
MDG attainment would requirebull Enhanced revenue generationbull LGU private sector and civil society supportbull Expansion of microfinance services for the poorbull Pursuit of projects with high economic impactbull Right-sizing the bureaucracybull Privatization andbull Tapping OFW remittances
To attain the 2015 goal and targets of Education For All the country needs toimplement policies programs and projects that will address the needs of specificlearners particularly those belonging to the un-reached and under-served groups
A Explicit Articulation of Inclusive Education Policy and Substantial Increase inBudget Provision
First DepEd needs to explicitly articulate ldquoInclusive Educationrdquo as the overallpolicy and planning framework of EFA This policy will dictate how the curriculum will be delivered including the programs projects and resource requirements that will support the specific needs of particular groups of learners One of the policies thatDepEd will be issuing soon is the institutionalization of Alternative Delivery ModePrograms that will cater to learners in difficult and different circumstances and which will use self-learning modules
Second the government should take comprehensive but concrete actions toaddress the inadequate use of the budget for basic education Specifically the government should consider the following in coming-up with a financing strategy for EFA
1048707 underinvestment in basic education (only 24 percent of the GDP) about85 percent of DepEdrsquos budget goes to salaries of personnel and1048707 inequitable distribution of limited national and local government resourcesespecially for capital outlay and operating costs due to some ldquoloopholesrdquo inexisting policies
The current inequitable distribution of resources will require the government toreview existing legislations and policies in allocating resources for schools in ruralareas to address the existing bias against rural schools Moreover there is a need torevisit the implementation of the law on ldquoGovernment Assistance to Students andTeachers in Private Educationrdquo to find out if the national government subsidy toprivate schools benefits the poor students and if the private schools produce betterquality outputs than the public schools
bull B Addressing the Socio-Economic and GeographicalGeophysical Factors that
bull Affect the attainment of Education For Allbull 143 The Philippine basic education system should be
flexible and responsive to thebull needs of learners as affected by non-school factors such
as
The Philippine basic education system should be flexible and responsive to theneeds of learners as affected by non-school factors such asa Economic Factors
1048707 The country is still dependent on agriculture fishing and forestry but at the same time an emerging global market for business process ICT spare parts medical services to name a few and this will require 51 DepEdrsquos implementation of a more relevant basic education curriculum in relation to local and global needs
Social Factors
1048707 The increasing percentage of school-age population requires thegovernment to effectively and efficiently implement fiscal reforms as thiswill have major implications in attaining the goal of education for all Inthis regard DepEd should actively participate in advocating for efficienttax revenue collection Moreover mobilization of resources from localgovernments private sector and other partners will also help thecountry finance the increasing budgetary requirements of EFA
Language and Cultural Factors With different ethnic and Muslim groups spread across country ndash
effective implementation of the curriculum indigenization policy and national curriculum for Muslim education is imperative
1048707 With more than 111 dialects spoken there is a need to revisit the current policy on medium of instruction effective nationwide implementation of the use of the mother tongue or the childrsquos language as medium for instruction in pre-school and the first two grades in the elementary level
Geographical and geophysical factors
1048707 Considering the huge size of the basic education system (over40000 public schools in 7107 islands) the applications of moderninformation and communication technology may offer the onlyfeasible medium for delivering high-quality instruction to millions oflearners in a large diverse and geographically dispersed population1048707 DepEd must seriously consider adopting a flexible school calendar ndasheg first three months of the school calendar (June to August) are the rainy months with frequent flooding in Metro Manila supervision of schools is very difficult and dangerous during the rainy and typhoon season
1048707 There is need to adopt differentiated designs for school facilities to withstand natural calamities such as typhoons and earthquakes
bull C Reaching the Un-reached and Underserved Groups of Learners
bull 144 Providing children in difficultdifferent circumstances access to quality and
bull relevant basic education is still a big challenge that the country should immediately
bull address To witbull bull Children Engaged in Labor DepEd needs to intensify
the implementation of itsbull distance learning program both for elementary and
secondary levels so thatbull schoolchildren who really need to work to earn a living
could still continuebull schooling even without regularly attending classes
bull bull Street Children
bull DepEd needs to establish a strong partnership with other
bull government agencies and other partners (NGOs privatebusiness sectorLGUs)
bull in providing basic education and other social and livelihood services to street children and their families (the main objective of the latter services is to sustain childrenrsquos schooling)
bull bull Children with Special Needs (Gifted and Differently-abled)
bull With the limited coverage of existing government educational facilities DepEd together with other agencies and partners need to work on the expansion of basic education services to reach more persons with disability DepEd should specifically work on
bull the strengthening and expansion of its SPED classes in the existing public
bull elementary and secondary schools and the strengthening and enrichment of its regular classes to mainstream the people with disabilities
(1990 or Level 2015 Attaining theMDG year closest (20022004) 1 Targets
to 1990) 2
Eradicate extreme poverty and hunger underweight among 0-5 yo children 345 276 1725 MediumAchieve universal primary education
Elementary participation rate 3 851 a 9005 100 MediumImprove maternal healthMaternal mortality rate 209 172 c 522 Medium
Increase access to RH servicesContraceptive prevalence rate 40 b 489 70 Medium
Achieve universal primary education
Elementary cohort survival rate 684 a 698 833 Low
Muslim Children With the big percentage (93) of Muslim school-age population in the public school system the effective implementation of the national curriculum for Muslim education in the public school system is verycritical The overall goal of the curriculum is to develop the core competencies of Muslim children in order for them to function effectively in society within thecontext of their environment and culture and that of the wider community In the long run it will hopefully effectively address the economic social political problems in Muslim-dominated areas and the entire country in general
bull Children in Conflict-Affected Areas Convergence of support for the protection ofchildren especially those who are not educated from being vulnerable targets fortraining and indoctrination as fighters There is also a need to execute acovenant among and between concerned parties to protect schools as ldquopeacezonesrdquo
In summary the country was not able to attain its 2005 targets in almost all key outcome indicators in Early Childhood Education Formal Basic Education and Alternative Learning System
Most of the regions have performance classified asldquofalling further behindrdquo or with performance lower than the national level in 2002 and continued to decline in 2005 While substantial investments were poured into the establishment of basic education facilities these were not enough to ensure that all3-5 year olds are in Early Childhood Education learning centers and all school-aged children were in school and able to continue and eventually complete basic education with satisfactory achievement level The basic education system should 53 be responsive to the differentiated needs of learners where a ldquoone-size fit allrdquo or conventional interventions (such as construction of classrooms provision of textbooks etc) are not enough or will no longer work
MDG attainment would requireEnhanced revenue generationLGU private sector and civil society supportPursuit of projects with high economic impactandTapping OFW remittances
Working towards achieving one Goal will make us closer to achievement of the rest amp would reduce costs of achieving othersrdquo Eveline Herfkens
SDC Res No 1 2003 ldquoExpanding
functions and composition of
MC-IHDCrdquo
DILG MC 2004-152 ldquoGuide to LGUs in the
Localization of the MDGsrdquo
MTPDP 2004-2010 hews
closely to the MDGs
Strong commitment
of the business
sector and civil society
Investment identification per goal and target in MTPIP
2005-2010
Strong support of
donor community
for the MDGs
Legislative support of Congress
Enabling Environment for the MDGs
Poverty Situation
FIGURE 1 Poverty Incidence of Population by Region 2003
Legend
Below national average (73 - 304)Above national average(305 - 542)
Source
NSO Family Income and Expenditures Survey 2003
ARMM 531
Cordillera Region 312
Metro Manila 73
Ilocos Region 302
Cagayan Valley 245
Central Luzon 177
CALABARZON 188
MIMAROPA 479
Bicol Region 484
Western Visayas 391
Central Visayas 284
Eastern Visayas 433
Western Mindanao 494
Northern Mindanao 443
Southern Mindanao 344
Central Mindanao 384
CARAGA 542
Annual Per Capita Poverty Threshold Poverty Incidence of Families and Population by Region 2000 and 2003
2000 Revised 2003 2000 Revised 2003 2000 Revised 2003Philippines 11 451 12 267 275 247 330 304NCR 15 693 16 796 57 50 76 73CAR 13 066 13 976 307 248 376 312Region I 12 685 13 276 294 244 351 302Region II 11 128 11 409 252 193 304 245Region III 13 760 14 342 173 137 214 177Region IV-A 13 657 14 616 152 149 191 188Region IV-B 11 995 12 406 363 397 452 479Region V 11 372 12 354 453 405 526 484Region VI 11 313 12 275 366 313 444 391Region VII 9 656 9 779 315 237 362 284Region VIII 9 518 10 802 375 355 451 433Region IX 9 116 10 414 385 441 448 494Region X 10 503 11 609 379 379 438 443Region XI 10 264 11 276 277 281 331 344Region XII 10 466 11 303 407 320 468 384Caraga 10 896 12 000 437 473 509 542ARMM 12 192 12 739 537 457 598 531
Poverty Incidenceof Population ()Region
Annual Per Capita PovertyThreshold (in Pesos)
Poverty Incidenceof Families ()
FIGURE 2 Subsistence Incidence of Population by Region 2003
Legend
Below national average Above national average
Source
NSO_Family and Income Expenditure Study 2003
ARMM 241
Cordillera Region 134
Metro Manila 06
Ilocos Region 112
Cagayan Valley 76
Central Luzon 42
CALABARZON 49
MIMAROPA 229
Bicol Region 266
Western Visayas 177
Central Visayas 146
Eastern Visayas 21
Western Mindanao 328
Northern Mindanao 254
Southern Mindanao 176
Central Mindanao 184
CARAGA 31
Annual Per Capita Food Threshold Subsistence Incidence of Families and Population by Region 2000 and 2003
2000 Revised 2003 2000 Revised 2003 2000 Revised 2003Philippines 7 707 8 134 123 104 158 138NCR 9 570 9 974 07 04 10 06CAR 8 744 9 117 137 98 179 134Region I 8 552 8 903 114 81 152 112Region II 7 560 8 026 93 56 118 76Region III 8 764 9 338 42 29 55 42Region IV-A 8 782 9 189 51 37 65 49Region IV-B 8 078 8 339 174 177 241 229Region V 8 047 8 372 233 203 293 266Region VI 7 983 8 386 174 129 231 177Region VII 6 759 7 016 169 112 207 146Region VIII 7 080 7 696 191 155 248 210Region IX 6 574 7 245 210 279 258 328Region X 7 296 7 999 192 197 238 254Region XI 7 087 7 751 128 135 167 176Region XII 7 235 7 804 179 140 226 184Caraga 7 667 8 353 244 245 307 310ARMM 8 313 8 737 239 186 285 241
RegionAnnual Per Capita Food Subsistence Incidence Subsistence Incidence
Threshold (in Pesos) of Families () of Population ()
FIGURE 3 Gini Concentration Ratios by Region 2003
Legend
Below National AverageAbove National Average
ARMM 03464
Cordillera Region 04294
Metro Manila 0413
Ilocos Region 03968
Cagayan Valley 04411
Central Luzon 03486
CALABARZON 04058
MIMAROPA 04354
Bicol Region 04648
Western Visayas 04392
Central Visayas 04711
Eastern Visayas 04577
Western Mindanao 05197
Northern Mindanao 04768
Southern Mindanao 04583
Central Mindanao 04567
CARAGA 04294
Gini Coefficient Among Families by Region 2000 and 2003
Region2000 2003 Change
Philippines 04822 04660 -16NCR 04451 04130 -32CAR 04439 04294 -15Region I 04071 03968 -10Region II 04227 04411 18Region III 03591 03486 -11Region IV-A 04086 04058 -03Region IV-B 04076 04354 28Region V 04455 04648 19Region VI 04594 04392 -20Region VII 04691 04711 02Region VIII 04807 04577 -23Region IX 04732 05197 47Region X 04794 04768 -03Region XI 04318 04567 25Region XII 04631 04583 -05Caraga 04118 04294 18ARMM 03171 03464 29
GINI
FIGURE 4 Percentage of Households with Less than 100 Energy Adequacy
FIGURE 5 Percentage of Underweight Children 0-5 Year Olds
Meeting Goal 1 Eradicate Extreme Poverty and Hunger
Priority Policies and Programs
bull Kapit-Bisig Laban sa Kahirapan (KALAHI)
bull Enrolment of 7 million beneficiaries under the National Health Insurance Program (NHIP)
bull Wholesale portfolio of the Peoplersquos Credit and Finance Corporation (PCFC)
bull Implementation of asset reform programs
bull Delivery of human development services
MDGs Amount
(in US$ million)
Share to Total MDG-
Related ODA
1 - Eradicate extreme poverty amp hunger 62594 7740
2 - Achieve universal primary education 5579 690
3 - Promote gender equality 38 005
4 - Reduce child mortality 1399 173
5 - Improve maternal health 1570 194
6 - Combat HIVAIDS malaria amp other diseases 253 031
7 - Ensure environmental sustainability 94331 1167
TOTAL 80866 10000
Summary of ODA for completed amp ongoing projects by MDG category from 2001-2005 in million US$
Source NEDA-PMS
ODA for MDGs
INVESTMENTS SUPPORTIVE OF THE MDGs 2005-2010
MDGs COST
(in PhP Billion)
1 - Eradicate extreme poverty amp hunger 129422 - Achieve universal primary education 5673 - Promote gender equality -4 - Reduce child mortality
6995 - Improve maternal health
6 - Combat HIVAIDS malaria amp other diseases
7 - Ensure environmental sustainability 19888 ndash Global partnership for development 1251
TOTAL 17447
Source NEDA-PIS
INTENSIFYING MULTISECTORAL PARTNERSHIP AND COLLABORATION
Government (executive legislature judicial)
Local Government
CSOsAcademe
Local Government
PrivateBusiness
Donor Community
Environmental Situationand Challenges
Goal 7 Ensure Environmental Sustainability
bull Forests resources and watersheds
bull Biodiversity resources
bull Coastal and marine resources
bull Air quality
bull Water resources
bull Waste and toxic chemicals
Area Proportion to Total
(Hectares) ()
7168400 100
2560872 36
Broadleaved 2448864
Mixed 24618
Coniferous 87390
4030588 56
Broadleaved 3847284
Mixed 69861
Coniferous 113443
247362 3
329578 5Source Forest Management Bureau (FMB)
Total Forest
Mangrove
Plantation
Forest Cover by Forest Type 2003
Closed Forest
Open Forest
Category
Area Reforested 1990-2003 (in hectares)Year Total
Government
Percent Non-Government
Percent
Sector
2003 15087 13195 875 1892 125
2002 25620 20682 807 4938 193
2001 31440 26524 844 4916 156
2000 27632 21740 787 5892 213
1999 42165 31183 74 10982 26
1998 42368 33219 784 9149 216
1997 66236 49301 744 16935 256
1996 46096 18869 409 27227 591
1995 65233 21841 335 43392 665
1994 49551 18032 364 31519 636
1993 19211 6347 33 12864 67
1992 40593 24304 599 16289 401
1991 93039 73602 791 19437 209
1990 191663 153949 803 37714 197
Annual Average
53995
Source DENR Annual Report
Biodiversity Resources
Philippineshellip one of the megadiverse countries in the
world higher regard for the endemism of local
species
buthellip most severely threatened of the
megadiverse countries
Coastal and Marine Resources rich sources of fish and aquatic products habitat for countless underwater wildlife natural areas for recreationtourism Water resourcesbull disparities in water supply coverage across regionsbull depletion of ground water especially in Metro
Manila and Metro Cebubull pollution of water sources
Air Qualitybull pollution remains a problem in Metro Manila and
major urban centersbull on the level of suspended particulates (TSP) air
quality is not within standards
Waste and Toxic Chemicalsbull solid waste generation in Metro Manila is estimated at
5345 tons per daybull urbanization inevitably increased the use of chemicalsbull no integrated treatment facility for hazardous waste
Priority Policies and Programs
bull Adoption of Sustainable Forest Management
bull Revised Forestry Code of the Philippines and the Watersheds Code
bull Various biodiversity acts
bull Fisheries Code and AFMA
bull Clean Air Act
Challenges and Priorities for Action
bull Sustainable and more productive utilization of natural resources
bull Focus and strengthen the protection of vulnerable and ecologically fragile areas
bull Create healthier environment for the populationbull Mitigate the occurrence of natural disasters bull Ensure environmental accountability for all
industries
CROSS-CUTTING CHALLENGEShellip
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005
Government Expenditure Program by Sector FY 2000-2005
Social Services Debt Service Economic Services General Public Services Defense
CROSSCUTTING CHALLENGES AND PRIORITIES FOR ACTION
Source DBM Budget of Expenditure and Sources of Financing
FINANCING THE MDGs
SectorYear 2001 2002 2003 2004
Economic Services 15982070 45484830 52853500 58700890
(15) (32) (33) (34)Social Services 28979110 26352690 34001700 36135990
(27) (19) (21) (21)General Public Services 63375820 69580140 73954470 78545740
(58) (49) (46) (45)Total Public Expenditures 108337000 141417660 160809670 173382620
FINANCING THE MDGs
Distribution of Public Expenditures by Local Government UnitsBy Sector 2001-2004 (in thousand pesos)
Source DBM Budget of Expenditure and Sources of Financing
CROSSCUTTING CHALLENGES AND PRIORITIES FOR ACTION
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
2001 2002 2003 2004
ODA Commitments by SectorFY 2001-2004 (US$ million)
Agriculture agrarianreform and naturalresources
Governance andinstitutionsdevelopment
Infrastructuredevelopment
Social reform anddevelopment
Industry and services
Source NEDA-PIS
CROSSCUTTING CHALLENGES AND PRIORITIES FOR ACTION
FINANCING THE MDGs
CROSS-CUTTING CHALLENGES AND
PRIORITIES FOR ACTIONbull Reduce disparities across regions
bull Increase resource allocation for MDG-related programs and projects
bull Enforce fullstricter implementation of laws amp ensure passage of MDG-supportive bills
bull Strengthen monitoring and implementation
bull Scale-up campaign for localization
bull Develop an advocacy plan
bull Intensify multisectoral partnership amp collaboration
Facilitating Factors bull Strong global support for MDGs by the United
Nations ASEAN and other multilateral organizations
bull Expanding national support among policymakers for MDGs (eg creation of the House Committee on MDGs issuance of EO on the MDGs)
bull Prioritization of MDGs in resource allocation (eg focusing of MTPIP investments on MDGs)
bull Increasing awareness and participation of private sector LGUs in MDG-related programs
Hindering Factors
bull Resource constraints (ie MDG financing gap of about $15 billion yearly)
bull Lack of support by creditors for the Debt for MDG ProjectsDebt for Equity in MDG Projects initiative
bull Low budgetary priority for MDGs accorded by some LGUs and
bull Lack of disaggregated data to monitor MDGs at local levels
Parallel Initiatives
Participation in the High-Level Plenary Meeting on MDGs
Formulation of the Plan of Action for Poverty Reduction (2006-2010)Enhance the current Poverty Reduction
Strategy and Program Framework
Advocacy for the Philippine proposal on Debt for Equity in MDG Projects
Implications on the Philippine Economy
MDG attainment would requirebull Enhanced revenue generationbull LGU private sector and civil society supportbull Expansion of microfinance services for the poorbull Pursuit of projects with high economic impactbull Right-sizing the bureaucracybull Privatization andbull Tapping OFW remittances
First DepEd needs to explicitly articulate ldquoInclusive Educationrdquo as the overallpolicy and planning framework of EFA This policy will dictate how the curriculum will be delivered including the programs projects and resource requirements that will support the specific needs of particular groups of learners One of the policies thatDepEd will be issuing soon is the institutionalization of Alternative Delivery ModePrograms that will cater to learners in difficult and different circumstances and which will use self-learning modules
Second the government should take comprehensive but concrete actions toaddress the inadequate use of the budget for basic education Specifically the government should consider the following in coming-up with a financing strategy for EFA
1048707 underinvestment in basic education (only 24 percent of the GDP) about85 percent of DepEdrsquos budget goes to salaries of personnel and1048707 inequitable distribution of limited national and local government resourcesespecially for capital outlay and operating costs due to some ldquoloopholesrdquo inexisting policies
The current inequitable distribution of resources will require the government toreview existing legislations and policies in allocating resources for schools in ruralareas to address the existing bias against rural schools Moreover there is a need torevisit the implementation of the law on ldquoGovernment Assistance to Students andTeachers in Private Educationrdquo to find out if the national government subsidy toprivate schools benefits the poor students and if the private schools produce betterquality outputs than the public schools
bull B Addressing the Socio-Economic and GeographicalGeophysical Factors that
bull Affect the attainment of Education For Allbull 143 The Philippine basic education system should be
flexible and responsive to thebull needs of learners as affected by non-school factors such
as
The Philippine basic education system should be flexible and responsive to theneeds of learners as affected by non-school factors such asa Economic Factors
1048707 The country is still dependent on agriculture fishing and forestry but at the same time an emerging global market for business process ICT spare parts medical services to name a few and this will require 51 DepEdrsquos implementation of a more relevant basic education curriculum in relation to local and global needs
Social Factors
1048707 The increasing percentage of school-age population requires thegovernment to effectively and efficiently implement fiscal reforms as thiswill have major implications in attaining the goal of education for all Inthis regard DepEd should actively participate in advocating for efficienttax revenue collection Moreover mobilization of resources from localgovernments private sector and other partners will also help thecountry finance the increasing budgetary requirements of EFA
Language and Cultural Factors With different ethnic and Muslim groups spread across country ndash
effective implementation of the curriculum indigenization policy and national curriculum for Muslim education is imperative
1048707 With more than 111 dialects spoken there is a need to revisit the current policy on medium of instruction effective nationwide implementation of the use of the mother tongue or the childrsquos language as medium for instruction in pre-school and the first two grades in the elementary level
Geographical and geophysical factors
1048707 Considering the huge size of the basic education system (over40000 public schools in 7107 islands) the applications of moderninformation and communication technology may offer the onlyfeasible medium for delivering high-quality instruction to millions oflearners in a large diverse and geographically dispersed population1048707 DepEd must seriously consider adopting a flexible school calendar ndasheg first three months of the school calendar (June to August) are the rainy months with frequent flooding in Metro Manila supervision of schools is very difficult and dangerous during the rainy and typhoon season
1048707 There is need to adopt differentiated designs for school facilities to withstand natural calamities such as typhoons and earthquakes
bull C Reaching the Un-reached and Underserved Groups of Learners
bull 144 Providing children in difficultdifferent circumstances access to quality and
bull relevant basic education is still a big challenge that the country should immediately
bull address To witbull bull Children Engaged in Labor DepEd needs to intensify
the implementation of itsbull distance learning program both for elementary and
secondary levels so thatbull schoolchildren who really need to work to earn a living
could still continuebull schooling even without regularly attending classes
bull bull Street Children
bull DepEd needs to establish a strong partnership with other
bull government agencies and other partners (NGOs privatebusiness sectorLGUs)
bull in providing basic education and other social and livelihood services to street children and their families (the main objective of the latter services is to sustain childrenrsquos schooling)
bull bull Children with Special Needs (Gifted and Differently-abled)
bull With the limited coverage of existing government educational facilities DepEd together with other agencies and partners need to work on the expansion of basic education services to reach more persons with disability DepEd should specifically work on
bull the strengthening and expansion of its SPED classes in the existing public
bull elementary and secondary schools and the strengthening and enrichment of its regular classes to mainstream the people with disabilities
(1990 or Level 2015 Attaining theMDG year closest (20022004) 1 Targets
to 1990) 2
Eradicate extreme poverty and hunger underweight among 0-5 yo children 345 276 1725 MediumAchieve universal primary education
Elementary participation rate 3 851 a 9005 100 MediumImprove maternal healthMaternal mortality rate 209 172 c 522 Medium
Increase access to RH servicesContraceptive prevalence rate 40 b 489 70 Medium
Achieve universal primary education
Elementary cohort survival rate 684 a 698 833 Low
Muslim Children With the big percentage (93) of Muslim school-age population in the public school system the effective implementation of the national curriculum for Muslim education in the public school system is verycritical The overall goal of the curriculum is to develop the core competencies of Muslim children in order for them to function effectively in society within thecontext of their environment and culture and that of the wider community In the long run it will hopefully effectively address the economic social political problems in Muslim-dominated areas and the entire country in general
bull Children in Conflict-Affected Areas Convergence of support for the protection ofchildren especially those who are not educated from being vulnerable targets fortraining and indoctrination as fighters There is also a need to execute acovenant among and between concerned parties to protect schools as ldquopeacezonesrdquo
In summary the country was not able to attain its 2005 targets in almost all key outcome indicators in Early Childhood Education Formal Basic Education and Alternative Learning System
Most of the regions have performance classified asldquofalling further behindrdquo or with performance lower than the national level in 2002 and continued to decline in 2005 While substantial investments were poured into the establishment of basic education facilities these were not enough to ensure that all3-5 year olds are in Early Childhood Education learning centers and all school-aged children were in school and able to continue and eventually complete basic education with satisfactory achievement level The basic education system should 53 be responsive to the differentiated needs of learners where a ldquoone-size fit allrdquo or conventional interventions (such as construction of classrooms provision of textbooks etc) are not enough or will no longer work
MDG attainment would requireEnhanced revenue generationLGU private sector and civil society supportPursuit of projects with high economic impactandTapping OFW remittances
Working towards achieving one Goal will make us closer to achievement of the rest amp would reduce costs of achieving othersrdquo Eveline Herfkens
SDC Res No 1 2003 ldquoExpanding
functions and composition of
MC-IHDCrdquo
DILG MC 2004-152 ldquoGuide to LGUs in the
Localization of the MDGsrdquo
MTPDP 2004-2010 hews
closely to the MDGs
Strong commitment
of the business
sector and civil society
Investment identification per goal and target in MTPIP
2005-2010
Strong support of
donor community
for the MDGs
Legislative support of Congress
Enabling Environment for the MDGs
Poverty Situation
FIGURE 1 Poverty Incidence of Population by Region 2003
Legend
Below national average (73 - 304)Above national average(305 - 542)
Source
NSO Family Income and Expenditures Survey 2003
ARMM 531
Cordillera Region 312
Metro Manila 73
Ilocos Region 302
Cagayan Valley 245
Central Luzon 177
CALABARZON 188
MIMAROPA 479
Bicol Region 484
Western Visayas 391
Central Visayas 284
Eastern Visayas 433
Western Mindanao 494
Northern Mindanao 443
Southern Mindanao 344
Central Mindanao 384
CARAGA 542
Annual Per Capita Poverty Threshold Poverty Incidence of Families and Population by Region 2000 and 2003
2000 Revised 2003 2000 Revised 2003 2000 Revised 2003Philippines 11 451 12 267 275 247 330 304NCR 15 693 16 796 57 50 76 73CAR 13 066 13 976 307 248 376 312Region I 12 685 13 276 294 244 351 302Region II 11 128 11 409 252 193 304 245Region III 13 760 14 342 173 137 214 177Region IV-A 13 657 14 616 152 149 191 188Region IV-B 11 995 12 406 363 397 452 479Region V 11 372 12 354 453 405 526 484Region VI 11 313 12 275 366 313 444 391Region VII 9 656 9 779 315 237 362 284Region VIII 9 518 10 802 375 355 451 433Region IX 9 116 10 414 385 441 448 494Region X 10 503 11 609 379 379 438 443Region XI 10 264 11 276 277 281 331 344Region XII 10 466 11 303 407 320 468 384Caraga 10 896 12 000 437 473 509 542ARMM 12 192 12 739 537 457 598 531
Poverty Incidenceof Population ()Region
Annual Per Capita PovertyThreshold (in Pesos)
Poverty Incidenceof Families ()
FIGURE 2 Subsistence Incidence of Population by Region 2003
Legend
Below national average Above national average
Source
NSO_Family and Income Expenditure Study 2003
ARMM 241
Cordillera Region 134
Metro Manila 06
Ilocos Region 112
Cagayan Valley 76
Central Luzon 42
CALABARZON 49
MIMAROPA 229
Bicol Region 266
Western Visayas 177
Central Visayas 146
Eastern Visayas 21
Western Mindanao 328
Northern Mindanao 254
Southern Mindanao 176
Central Mindanao 184
CARAGA 31
Annual Per Capita Food Threshold Subsistence Incidence of Families and Population by Region 2000 and 2003
2000 Revised 2003 2000 Revised 2003 2000 Revised 2003Philippines 7 707 8 134 123 104 158 138NCR 9 570 9 974 07 04 10 06CAR 8 744 9 117 137 98 179 134Region I 8 552 8 903 114 81 152 112Region II 7 560 8 026 93 56 118 76Region III 8 764 9 338 42 29 55 42Region IV-A 8 782 9 189 51 37 65 49Region IV-B 8 078 8 339 174 177 241 229Region V 8 047 8 372 233 203 293 266Region VI 7 983 8 386 174 129 231 177Region VII 6 759 7 016 169 112 207 146Region VIII 7 080 7 696 191 155 248 210Region IX 6 574 7 245 210 279 258 328Region X 7 296 7 999 192 197 238 254Region XI 7 087 7 751 128 135 167 176Region XII 7 235 7 804 179 140 226 184Caraga 7 667 8 353 244 245 307 310ARMM 8 313 8 737 239 186 285 241
RegionAnnual Per Capita Food Subsistence Incidence Subsistence Incidence
Threshold (in Pesos) of Families () of Population ()
FIGURE 3 Gini Concentration Ratios by Region 2003
Legend
Below National AverageAbove National Average
ARMM 03464
Cordillera Region 04294
Metro Manila 0413
Ilocos Region 03968
Cagayan Valley 04411
Central Luzon 03486
CALABARZON 04058
MIMAROPA 04354
Bicol Region 04648
Western Visayas 04392
Central Visayas 04711
Eastern Visayas 04577
Western Mindanao 05197
Northern Mindanao 04768
Southern Mindanao 04583
Central Mindanao 04567
CARAGA 04294
Gini Coefficient Among Families by Region 2000 and 2003
Region2000 2003 Change
Philippines 04822 04660 -16NCR 04451 04130 -32CAR 04439 04294 -15Region I 04071 03968 -10Region II 04227 04411 18Region III 03591 03486 -11Region IV-A 04086 04058 -03Region IV-B 04076 04354 28Region V 04455 04648 19Region VI 04594 04392 -20Region VII 04691 04711 02Region VIII 04807 04577 -23Region IX 04732 05197 47Region X 04794 04768 -03Region XI 04318 04567 25Region XII 04631 04583 -05Caraga 04118 04294 18ARMM 03171 03464 29
GINI
FIGURE 4 Percentage of Households with Less than 100 Energy Adequacy
FIGURE 5 Percentage of Underweight Children 0-5 Year Olds
Meeting Goal 1 Eradicate Extreme Poverty and Hunger
Priority Policies and Programs
bull Kapit-Bisig Laban sa Kahirapan (KALAHI)
bull Enrolment of 7 million beneficiaries under the National Health Insurance Program (NHIP)
bull Wholesale portfolio of the Peoplersquos Credit and Finance Corporation (PCFC)
bull Implementation of asset reform programs
bull Delivery of human development services
MDGs Amount
(in US$ million)
Share to Total MDG-
Related ODA
1 - Eradicate extreme poverty amp hunger 62594 7740
2 - Achieve universal primary education 5579 690
3 - Promote gender equality 38 005
4 - Reduce child mortality 1399 173
5 - Improve maternal health 1570 194
6 - Combat HIVAIDS malaria amp other diseases 253 031
7 - Ensure environmental sustainability 94331 1167
TOTAL 80866 10000
Summary of ODA for completed amp ongoing projects by MDG category from 2001-2005 in million US$
Source NEDA-PMS
ODA for MDGs
INVESTMENTS SUPPORTIVE OF THE MDGs 2005-2010
MDGs COST
(in PhP Billion)
1 - Eradicate extreme poverty amp hunger 129422 - Achieve universal primary education 5673 - Promote gender equality -4 - Reduce child mortality
6995 - Improve maternal health
6 - Combat HIVAIDS malaria amp other diseases
7 - Ensure environmental sustainability 19888 ndash Global partnership for development 1251
TOTAL 17447
Source NEDA-PIS
INTENSIFYING MULTISECTORAL PARTNERSHIP AND COLLABORATION
Government (executive legislature judicial)
Local Government
CSOsAcademe
Local Government
PrivateBusiness
Donor Community
Environmental Situationand Challenges
Goal 7 Ensure Environmental Sustainability
bull Forests resources and watersheds
bull Biodiversity resources
bull Coastal and marine resources
bull Air quality
bull Water resources
bull Waste and toxic chemicals
Area Proportion to Total
(Hectares) ()
7168400 100
2560872 36
Broadleaved 2448864
Mixed 24618
Coniferous 87390
4030588 56
Broadleaved 3847284
Mixed 69861
Coniferous 113443
247362 3
329578 5Source Forest Management Bureau (FMB)
Total Forest
Mangrove
Plantation
Forest Cover by Forest Type 2003
Closed Forest
Open Forest
Category
Area Reforested 1990-2003 (in hectares)Year Total
Government
Percent Non-Government
Percent
Sector
2003 15087 13195 875 1892 125
2002 25620 20682 807 4938 193
2001 31440 26524 844 4916 156
2000 27632 21740 787 5892 213
1999 42165 31183 74 10982 26
1998 42368 33219 784 9149 216
1997 66236 49301 744 16935 256
1996 46096 18869 409 27227 591
1995 65233 21841 335 43392 665
1994 49551 18032 364 31519 636
1993 19211 6347 33 12864 67
1992 40593 24304 599 16289 401
1991 93039 73602 791 19437 209
1990 191663 153949 803 37714 197
Annual Average
53995
Source DENR Annual Report
Biodiversity Resources
Philippineshellip one of the megadiverse countries in the
world higher regard for the endemism of local
species
buthellip most severely threatened of the
megadiverse countries
Coastal and Marine Resources rich sources of fish and aquatic products habitat for countless underwater wildlife natural areas for recreationtourism Water resourcesbull disparities in water supply coverage across regionsbull depletion of ground water especially in Metro
Manila and Metro Cebubull pollution of water sources
Air Qualitybull pollution remains a problem in Metro Manila and
major urban centersbull on the level of suspended particulates (TSP) air
quality is not within standards
Waste and Toxic Chemicalsbull solid waste generation in Metro Manila is estimated at
5345 tons per daybull urbanization inevitably increased the use of chemicalsbull no integrated treatment facility for hazardous waste
Priority Policies and Programs
bull Adoption of Sustainable Forest Management
bull Revised Forestry Code of the Philippines and the Watersheds Code
bull Various biodiversity acts
bull Fisheries Code and AFMA
bull Clean Air Act
Challenges and Priorities for Action
bull Sustainable and more productive utilization of natural resources
bull Focus and strengthen the protection of vulnerable and ecologically fragile areas
bull Create healthier environment for the populationbull Mitigate the occurrence of natural disasters bull Ensure environmental accountability for all
industries
CROSS-CUTTING CHALLENGEShellip
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005
Government Expenditure Program by Sector FY 2000-2005
Social Services Debt Service Economic Services General Public Services Defense
CROSSCUTTING CHALLENGES AND PRIORITIES FOR ACTION
Source DBM Budget of Expenditure and Sources of Financing
FINANCING THE MDGs
SectorYear 2001 2002 2003 2004
Economic Services 15982070 45484830 52853500 58700890
(15) (32) (33) (34)Social Services 28979110 26352690 34001700 36135990
(27) (19) (21) (21)General Public Services 63375820 69580140 73954470 78545740
(58) (49) (46) (45)Total Public Expenditures 108337000 141417660 160809670 173382620
FINANCING THE MDGs
Distribution of Public Expenditures by Local Government UnitsBy Sector 2001-2004 (in thousand pesos)
Source DBM Budget of Expenditure and Sources of Financing
CROSSCUTTING CHALLENGES AND PRIORITIES FOR ACTION
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
2001 2002 2003 2004
ODA Commitments by SectorFY 2001-2004 (US$ million)
Agriculture agrarianreform and naturalresources
Governance andinstitutionsdevelopment
Infrastructuredevelopment
Social reform anddevelopment
Industry and services
Source NEDA-PIS
CROSSCUTTING CHALLENGES AND PRIORITIES FOR ACTION
FINANCING THE MDGs
CROSS-CUTTING CHALLENGES AND
PRIORITIES FOR ACTIONbull Reduce disparities across regions
bull Increase resource allocation for MDG-related programs and projects
bull Enforce fullstricter implementation of laws amp ensure passage of MDG-supportive bills
bull Strengthen monitoring and implementation
bull Scale-up campaign for localization
bull Develop an advocacy plan
bull Intensify multisectoral partnership amp collaboration
Facilitating Factors bull Strong global support for MDGs by the United
Nations ASEAN and other multilateral organizations
bull Expanding national support among policymakers for MDGs (eg creation of the House Committee on MDGs issuance of EO on the MDGs)
bull Prioritization of MDGs in resource allocation (eg focusing of MTPIP investments on MDGs)
bull Increasing awareness and participation of private sector LGUs in MDG-related programs
Hindering Factors
bull Resource constraints (ie MDG financing gap of about $15 billion yearly)
bull Lack of support by creditors for the Debt for MDG ProjectsDebt for Equity in MDG Projects initiative
bull Low budgetary priority for MDGs accorded by some LGUs and
bull Lack of disaggregated data to monitor MDGs at local levels
Parallel Initiatives
Participation in the High-Level Plenary Meeting on MDGs
Formulation of the Plan of Action for Poverty Reduction (2006-2010)Enhance the current Poverty Reduction
Strategy and Program Framework
Advocacy for the Philippine proposal on Debt for Equity in MDG Projects
Implications on the Philippine Economy
MDG attainment would requirebull Enhanced revenue generationbull LGU private sector and civil society supportbull Expansion of microfinance services for the poorbull Pursuit of projects with high economic impactbull Right-sizing the bureaucracybull Privatization andbull Tapping OFW remittances
The current inequitable distribution of resources will require the government toreview existing legislations and policies in allocating resources for schools in ruralareas to address the existing bias against rural schools Moreover there is a need torevisit the implementation of the law on ldquoGovernment Assistance to Students andTeachers in Private Educationrdquo to find out if the national government subsidy toprivate schools benefits the poor students and if the private schools produce betterquality outputs than the public schools
bull B Addressing the Socio-Economic and GeographicalGeophysical Factors that
bull Affect the attainment of Education For Allbull 143 The Philippine basic education system should be
flexible and responsive to thebull needs of learners as affected by non-school factors such
as
The Philippine basic education system should be flexible and responsive to theneeds of learners as affected by non-school factors such asa Economic Factors
1048707 The country is still dependent on agriculture fishing and forestry but at the same time an emerging global market for business process ICT spare parts medical services to name a few and this will require 51 DepEdrsquos implementation of a more relevant basic education curriculum in relation to local and global needs
Social Factors
1048707 The increasing percentage of school-age population requires thegovernment to effectively and efficiently implement fiscal reforms as thiswill have major implications in attaining the goal of education for all Inthis regard DepEd should actively participate in advocating for efficienttax revenue collection Moreover mobilization of resources from localgovernments private sector and other partners will also help thecountry finance the increasing budgetary requirements of EFA
Language and Cultural Factors With different ethnic and Muslim groups spread across country ndash
effective implementation of the curriculum indigenization policy and national curriculum for Muslim education is imperative
1048707 With more than 111 dialects spoken there is a need to revisit the current policy on medium of instruction effective nationwide implementation of the use of the mother tongue or the childrsquos language as medium for instruction in pre-school and the first two grades in the elementary level
Geographical and geophysical factors
1048707 Considering the huge size of the basic education system (over40000 public schools in 7107 islands) the applications of moderninformation and communication technology may offer the onlyfeasible medium for delivering high-quality instruction to millions oflearners in a large diverse and geographically dispersed population1048707 DepEd must seriously consider adopting a flexible school calendar ndasheg first three months of the school calendar (June to August) are the rainy months with frequent flooding in Metro Manila supervision of schools is very difficult and dangerous during the rainy and typhoon season
1048707 There is need to adopt differentiated designs for school facilities to withstand natural calamities such as typhoons and earthquakes
bull C Reaching the Un-reached and Underserved Groups of Learners
bull 144 Providing children in difficultdifferent circumstances access to quality and
bull relevant basic education is still a big challenge that the country should immediately
bull address To witbull bull Children Engaged in Labor DepEd needs to intensify
the implementation of itsbull distance learning program both for elementary and
secondary levels so thatbull schoolchildren who really need to work to earn a living
could still continuebull schooling even without regularly attending classes
bull bull Street Children
bull DepEd needs to establish a strong partnership with other
bull government agencies and other partners (NGOs privatebusiness sectorLGUs)
bull in providing basic education and other social and livelihood services to street children and their families (the main objective of the latter services is to sustain childrenrsquos schooling)
bull bull Children with Special Needs (Gifted and Differently-abled)
bull With the limited coverage of existing government educational facilities DepEd together with other agencies and partners need to work on the expansion of basic education services to reach more persons with disability DepEd should specifically work on
bull the strengthening and expansion of its SPED classes in the existing public
bull elementary and secondary schools and the strengthening and enrichment of its regular classes to mainstream the people with disabilities
(1990 or Level 2015 Attaining theMDG year closest (20022004) 1 Targets
to 1990) 2
Eradicate extreme poverty and hunger underweight among 0-5 yo children 345 276 1725 MediumAchieve universal primary education
Elementary participation rate 3 851 a 9005 100 MediumImprove maternal healthMaternal mortality rate 209 172 c 522 Medium
Increase access to RH servicesContraceptive prevalence rate 40 b 489 70 Medium
Achieve universal primary education
Elementary cohort survival rate 684 a 698 833 Low
Muslim Children With the big percentage (93) of Muslim school-age population in the public school system the effective implementation of the national curriculum for Muslim education in the public school system is verycritical The overall goal of the curriculum is to develop the core competencies of Muslim children in order for them to function effectively in society within thecontext of their environment and culture and that of the wider community In the long run it will hopefully effectively address the economic social political problems in Muslim-dominated areas and the entire country in general
bull Children in Conflict-Affected Areas Convergence of support for the protection ofchildren especially those who are not educated from being vulnerable targets fortraining and indoctrination as fighters There is also a need to execute acovenant among and between concerned parties to protect schools as ldquopeacezonesrdquo
In summary the country was not able to attain its 2005 targets in almost all key outcome indicators in Early Childhood Education Formal Basic Education and Alternative Learning System
Most of the regions have performance classified asldquofalling further behindrdquo or with performance lower than the national level in 2002 and continued to decline in 2005 While substantial investments were poured into the establishment of basic education facilities these were not enough to ensure that all3-5 year olds are in Early Childhood Education learning centers and all school-aged children were in school and able to continue and eventually complete basic education with satisfactory achievement level The basic education system should 53 be responsive to the differentiated needs of learners where a ldquoone-size fit allrdquo or conventional interventions (such as construction of classrooms provision of textbooks etc) are not enough or will no longer work
MDG attainment would requireEnhanced revenue generationLGU private sector and civil society supportPursuit of projects with high economic impactandTapping OFW remittances
Working towards achieving one Goal will make us closer to achievement of the rest amp would reduce costs of achieving othersrdquo Eveline Herfkens
SDC Res No 1 2003 ldquoExpanding
functions and composition of
MC-IHDCrdquo
DILG MC 2004-152 ldquoGuide to LGUs in the
Localization of the MDGsrdquo
MTPDP 2004-2010 hews
closely to the MDGs
Strong commitment
of the business
sector and civil society
Investment identification per goal and target in MTPIP
2005-2010
Strong support of
donor community
for the MDGs
Legislative support of Congress
Enabling Environment for the MDGs
Poverty Situation
FIGURE 1 Poverty Incidence of Population by Region 2003
Legend
Below national average (73 - 304)Above national average(305 - 542)
Source
NSO Family Income and Expenditures Survey 2003
ARMM 531
Cordillera Region 312
Metro Manila 73
Ilocos Region 302
Cagayan Valley 245
Central Luzon 177
CALABARZON 188
MIMAROPA 479
Bicol Region 484
Western Visayas 391
Central Visayas 284
Eastern Visayas 433
Western Mindanao 494
Northern Mindanao 443
Southern Mindanao 344
Central Mindanao 384
CARAGA 542
Annual Per Capita Poverty Threshold Poverty Incidence of Families and Population by Region 2000 and 2003
2000 Revised 2003 2000 Revised 2003 2000 Revised 2003Philippines 11 451 12 267 275 247 330 304NCR 15 693 16 796 57 50 76 73CAR 13 066 13 976 307 248 376 312Region I 12 685 13 276 294 244 351 302Region II 11 128 11 409 252 193 304 245Region III 13 760 14 342 173 137 214 177Region IV-A 13 657 14 616 152 149 191 188Region IV-B 11 995 12 406 363 397 452 479Region V 11 372 12 354 453 405 526 484Region VI 11 313 12 275 366 313 444 391Region VII 9 656 9 779 315 237 362 284Region VIII 9 518 10 802 375 355 451 433Region IX 9 116 10 414 385 441 448 494Region X 10 503 11 609 379 379 438 443Region XI 10 264 11 276 277 281 331 344Region XII 10 466 11 303 407 320 468 384Caraga 10 896 12 000 437 473 509 542ARMM 12 192 12 739 537 457 598 531
Poverty Incidenceof Population ()Region
Annual Per Capita PovertyThreshold (in Pesos)
Poverty Incidenceof Families ()
FIGURE 2 Subsistence Incidence of Population by Region 2003
Legend
Below national average Above national average
Source
NSO_Family and Income Expenditure Study 2003
ARMM 241
Cordillera Region 134
Metro Manila 06
Ilocos Region 112
Cagayan Valley 76
Central Luzon 42
CALABARZON 49
MIMAROPA 229
Bicol Region 266
Western Visayas 177
Central Visayas 146
Eastern Visayas 21
Western Mindanao 328
Northern Mindanao 254
Southern Mindanao 176
Central Mindanao 184
CARAGA 31
Annual Per Capita Food Threshold Subsistence Incidence of Families and Population by Region 2000 and 2003
2000 Revised 2003 2000 Revised 2003 2000 Revised 2003Philippines 7 707 8 134 123 104 158 138NCR 9 570 9 974 07 04 10 06CAR 8 744 9 117 137 98 179 134Region I 8 552 8 903 114 81 152 112Region II 7 560 8 026 93 56 118 76Region III 8 764 9 338 42 29 55 42Region IV-A 8 782 9 189 51 37 65 49Region IV-B 8 078 8 339 174 177 241 229Region V 8 047 8 372 233 203 293 266Region VI 7 983 8 386 174 129 231 177Region VII 6 759 7 016 169 112 207 146Region VIII 7 080 7 696 191 155 248 210Region IX 6 574 7 245 210 279 258 328Region X 7 296 7 999 192 197 238 254Region XI 7 087 7 751 128 135 167 176Region XII 7 235 7 804 179 140 226 184Caraga 7 667 8 353 244 245 307 310ARMM 8 313 8 737 239 186 285 241
RegionAnnual Per Capita Food Subsistence Incidence Subsistence Incidence
Threshold (in Pesos) of Families () of Population ()
FIGURE 3 Gini Concentration Ratios by Region 2003
Legend
Below National AverageAbove National Average
ARMM 03464
Cordillera Region 04294
Metro Manila 0413
Ilocos Region 03968
Cagayan Valley 04411
Central Luzon 03486
CALABARZON 04058
MIMAROPA 04354
Bicol Region 04648
Western Visayas 04392
Central Visayas 04711
Eastern Visayas 04577
Western Mindanao 05197
Northern Mindanao 04768
Southern Mindanao 04583
Central Mindanao 04567
CARAGA 04294
Gini Coefficient Among Families by Region 2000 and 2003
Region2000 2003 Change
Philippines 04822 04660 -16NCR 04451 04130 -32CAR 04439 04294 -15Region I 04071 03968 -10Region II 04227 04411 18Region III 03591 03486 -11Region IV-A 04086 04058 -03Region IV-B 04076 04354 28Region V 04455 04648 19Region VI 04594 04392 -20Region VII 04691 04711 02Region VIII 04807 04577 -23Region IX 04732 05197 47Region X 04794 04768 -03Region XI 04318 04567 25Region XII 04631 04583 -05Caraga 04118 04294 18ARMM 03171 03464 29
GINI
FIGURE 4 Percentage of Households with Less than 100 Energy Adequacy
FIGURE 5 Percentage of Underweight Children 0-5 Year Olds
Meeting Goal 1 Eradicate Extreme Poverty and Hunger
Priority Policies and Programs
bull Kapit-Bisig Laban sa Kahirapan (KALAHI)
bull Enrolment of 7 million beneficiaries under the National Health Insurance Program (NHIP)
bull Wholesale portfolio of the Peoplersquos Credit and Finance Corporation (PCFC)
bull Implementation of asset reform programs
bull Delivery of human development services
MDGs Amount
(in US$ million)
Share to Total MDG-
Related ODA
1 - Eradicate extreme poverty amp hunger 62594 7740
2 - Achieve universal primary education 5579 690
3 - Promote gender equality 38 005
4 - Reduce child mortality 1399 173
5 - Improve maternal health 1570 194
6 - Combat HIVAIDS malaria amp other diseases 253 031
7 - Ensure environmental sustainability 94331 1167
TOTAL 80866 10000
Summary of ODA for completed amp ongoing projects by MDG category from 2001-2005 in million US$
Source NEDA-PMS
ODA for MDGs
INVESTMENTS SUPPORTIVE OF THE MDGs 2005-2010
MDGs COST
(in PhP Billion)
1 - Eradicate extreme poverty amp hunger 129422 - Achieve universal primary education 5673 - Promote gender equality -4 - Reduce child mortality
6995 - Improve maternal health
6 - Combat HIVAIDS malaria amp other diseases
7 - Ensure environmental sustainability 19888 ndash Global partnership for development 1251
TOTAL 17447
Source NEDA-PIS
INTENSIFYING MULTISECTORAL PARTNERSHIP AND COLLABORATION
Government (executive legislature judicial)
Local Government
CSOsAcademe
Local Government
PrivateBusiness
Donor Community
Environmental Situationand Challenges
Goal 7 Ensure Environmental Sustainability
bull Forests resources and watersheds
bull Biodiversity resources
bull Coastal and marine resources
bull Air quality
bull Water resources
bull Waste and toxic chemicals
Area Proportion to Total
(Hectares) ()
7168400 100
2560872 36
Broadleaved 2448864
Mixed 24618
Coniferous 87390
4030588 56
Broadleaved 3847284
Mixed 69861
Coniferous 113443
247362 3
329578 5Source Forest Management Bureau (FMB)
Total Forest
Mangrove
Plantation
Forest Cover by Forest Type 2003
Closed Forest
Open Forest
Category
Area Reforested 1990-2003 (in hectares)Year Total
Government
Percent Non-Government
Percent
Sector
2003 15087 13195 875 1892 125
2002 25620 20682 807 4938 193
2001 31440 26524 844 4916 156
2000 27632 21740 787 5892 213
1999 42165 31183 74 10982 26
1998 42368 33219 784 9149 216
1997 66236 49301 744 16935 256
1996 46096 18869 409 27227 591
1995 65233 21841 335 43392 665
1994 49551 18032 364 31519 636
1993 19211 6347 33 12864 67
1992 40593 24304 599 16289 401
1991 93039 73602 791 19437 209
1990 191663 153949 803 37714 197
Annual Average
53995
Source DENR Annual Report
Biodiversity Resources
Philippineshellip one of the megadiverse countries in the
world higher regard for the endemism of local
species
buthellip most severely threatened of the
megadiverse countries
Coastal and Marine Resources rich sources of fish and aquatic products habitat for countless underwater wildlife natural areas for recreationtourism Water resourcesbull disparities in water supply coverage across regionsbull depletion of ground water especially in Metro
Manila and Metro Cebubull pollution of water sources
Air Qualitybull pollution remains a problem in Metro Manila and
major urban centersbull on the level of suspended particulates (TSP) air
quality is not within standards
Waste and Toxic Chemicalsbull solid waste generation in Metro Manila is estimated at
5345 tons per daybull urbanization inevitably increased the use of chemicalsbull no integrated treatment facility for hazardous waste
Priority Policies and Programs
bull Adoption of Sustainable Forest Management
bull Revised Forestry Code of the Philippines and the Watersheds Code
bull Various biodiversity acts
bull Fisheries Code and AFMA
bull Clean Air Act
Challenges and Priorities for Action
bull Sustainable and more productive utilization of natural resources
bull Focus and strengthen the protection of vulnerable and ecologically fragile areas
bull Create healthier environment for the populationbull Mitigate the occurrence of natural disasters bull Ensure environmental accountability for all
industries
CROSS-CUTTING CHALLENGEShellip
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005
Government Expenditure Program by Sector FY 2000-2005
Social Services Debt Service Economic Services General Public Services Defense
CROSSCUTTING CHALLENGES AND PRIORITIES FOR ACTION
Source DBM Budget of Expenditure and Sources of Financing
FINANCING THE MDGs
SectorYear 2001 2002 2003 2004
Economic Services 15982070 45484830 52853500 58700890
(15) (32) (33) (34)Social Services 28979110 26352690 34001700 36135990
(27) (19) (21) (21)General Public Services 63375820 69580140 73954470 78545740
(58) (49) (46) (45)Total Public Expenditures 108337000 141417660 160809670 173382620
FINANCING THE MDGs
Distribution of Public Expenditures by Local Government UnitsBy Sector 2001-2004 (in thousand pesos)
Source DBM Budget of Expenditure and Sources of Financing
CROSSCUTTING CHALLENGES AND PRIORITIES FOR ACTION
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
2001 2002 2003 2004
ODA Commitments by SectorFY 2001-2004 (US$ million)
Agriculture agrarianreform and naturalresources
Governance andinstitutionsdevelopment
Infrastructuredevelopment
Social reform anddevelopment
Industry and services
Source NEDA-PIS
CROSSCUTTING CHALLENGES AND PRIORITIES FOR ACTION
FINANCING THE MDGs
CROSS-CUTTING CHALLENGES AND
PRIORITIES FOR ACTIONbull Reduce disparities across regions
bull Increase resource allocation for MDG-related programs and projects
bull Enforce fullstricter implementation of laws amp ensure passage of MDG-supportive bills
bull Strengthen monitoring and implementation
bull Scale-up campaign for localization
bull Develop an advocacy plan
bull Intensify multisectoral partnership amp collaboration
Facilitating Factors bull Strong global support for MDGs by the United
Nations ASEAN and other multilateral organizations
bull Expanding national support among policymakers for MDGs (eg creation of the House Committee on MDGs issuance of EO on the MDGs)
bull Prioritization of MDGs in resource allocation (eg focusing of MTPIP investments on MDGs)
bull Increasing awareness and participation of private sector LGUs in MDG-related programs
Hindering Factors
bull Resource constraints (ie MDG financing gap of about $15 billion yearly)
bull Lack of support by creditors for the Debt for MDG ProjectsDebt for Equity in MDG Projects initiative
bull Low budgetary priority for MDGs accorded by some LGUs and
bull Lack of disaggregated data to monitor MDGs at local levels
Parallel Initiatives
Participation in the High-Level Plenary Meeting on MDGs
Formulation of the Plan of Action for Poverty Reduction (2006-2010)Enhance the current Poverty Reduction
Strategy and Program Framework
Advocacy for the Philippine proposal on Debt for Equity in MDG Projects
Implications on the Philippine Economy
MDG attainment would requirebull Enhanced revenue generationbull LGU private sector and civil society supportbull Expansion of microfinance services for the poorbull Pursuit of projects with high economic impactbull Right-sizing the bureaucracybull Privatization andbull Tapping OFW remittances
bull B Addressing the Socio-Economic and GeographicalGeophysical Factors that
bull Affect the attainment of Education For Allbull 143 The Philippine basic education system should be
flexible and responsive to thebull needs of learners as affected by non-school factors such
as
The Philippine basic education system should be flexible and responsive to theneeds of learners as affected by non-school factors such asa Economic Factors
1048707 The country is still dependent on agriculture fishing and forestry but at the same time an emerging global market for business process ICT spare parts medical services to name a few and this will require 51 DepEdrsquos implementation of a more relevant basic education curriculum in relation to local and global needs
Social Factors
1048707 The increasing percentage of school-age population requires thegovernment to effectively and efficiently implement fiscal reforms as thiswill have major implications in attaining the goal of education for all Inthis regard DepEd should actively participate in advocating for efficienttax revenue collection Moreover mobilization of resources from localgovernments private sector and other partners will also help thecountry finance the increasing budgetary requirements of EFA
Language and Cultural Factors With different ethnic and Muslim groups spread across country ndash
effective implementation of the curriculum indigenization policy and national curriculum for Muslim education is imperative
1048707 With more than 111 dialects spoken there is a need to revisit the current policy on medium of instruction effective nationwide implementation of the use of the mother tongue or the childrsquos language as medium for instruction in pre-school and the first two grades in the elementary level
Geographical and geophysical factors
1048707 Considering the huge size of the basic education system (over40000 public schools in 7107 islands) the applications of moderninformation and communication technology may offer the onlyfeasible medium for delivering high-quality instruction to millions oflearners in a large diverse and geographically dispersed population1048707 DepEd must seriously consider adopting a flexible school calendar ndasheg first three months of the school calendar (June to August) are the rainy months with frequent flooding in Metro Manila supervision of schools is very difficult and dangerous during the rainy and typhoon season
1048707 There is need to adopt differentiated designs for school facilities to withstand natural calamities such as typhoons and earthquakes
bull C Reaching the Un-reached and Underserved Groups of Learners
bull 144 Providing children in difficultdifferent circumstances access to quality and
bull relevant basic education is still a big challenge that the country should immediately
bull address To witbull bull Children Engaged in Labor DepEd needs to intensify
the implementation of itsbull distance learning program both for elementary and
secondary levels so thatbull schoolchildren who really need to work to earn a living
could still continuebull schooling even without regularly attending classes
bull bull Street Children
bull DepEd needs to establish a strong partnership with other
bull government agencies and other partners (NGOs privatebusiness sectorLGUs)
bull in providing basic education and other social and livelihood services to street children and their families (the main objective of the latter services is to sustain childrenrsquos schooling)
bull bull Children with Special Needs (Gifted and Differently-abled)
bull With the limited coverage of existing government educational facilities DepEd together with other agencies and partners need to work on the expansion of basic education services to reach more persons with disability DepEd should specifically work on
bull the strengthening and expansion of its SPED classes in the existing public
bull elementary and secondary schools and the strengthening and enrichment of its regular classes to mainstream the people with disabilities
(1990 or Level 2015 Attaining theMDG year closest (20022004) 1 Targets
to 1990) 2
Eradicate extreme poverty and hunger underweight among 0-5 yo children 345 276 1725 MediumAchieve universal primary education
Elementary participation rate 3 851 a 9005 100 MediumImprove maternal healthMaternal mortality rate 209 172 c 522 Medium
Increase access to RH servicesContraceptive prevalence rate 40 b 489 70 Medium
Achieve universal primary education
Elementary cohort survival rate 684 a 698 833 Low
Muslim Children With the big percentage (93) of Muslim school-age population in the public school system the effective implementation of the national curriculum for Muslim education in the public school system is verycritical The overall goal of the curriculum is to develop the core competencies of Muslim children in order for them to function effectively in society within thecontext of their environment and culture and that of the wider community In the long run it will hopefully effectively address the economic social political problems in Muslim-dominated areas and the entire country in general
bull Children in Conflict-Affected Areas Convergence of support for the protection ofchildren especially those who are not educated from being vulnerable targets fortraining and indoctrination as fighters There is also a need to execute acovenant among and between concerned parties to protect schools as ldquopeacezonesrdquo
In summary the country was not able to attain its 2005 targets in almost all key outcome indicators in Early Childhood Education Formal Basic Education and Alternative Learning System
Most of the regions have performance classified asldquofalling further behindrdquo or with performance lower than the national level in 2002 and continued to decline in 2005 While substantial investments were poured into the establishment of basic education facilities these were not enough to ensure that all3-5 year olds are in Early Childhood Education learning centers and all school-aged children were in school and able to continue and eventually complete basic education with satisfactory achievement level The basic education system should 53 be responsive to the differentiated needs of learners where a ldquoone-size fit allrdquo or conventional interventions (such as construction of classrooms provision of textbooks etc) are not enough or will no longer work
MDG attainment would requireEnhanced revenue generationLGU private sector and civil society supportPursuit of projects with high economic impactandTapping OFW remittances
Working towards achieving one Goal will make us closer to achievement of the rest amp would reduce costs of achieving othersrdquo Eveline Herfkens
SDC Res No 1 2003 ldquoExpanding
functions and composition of
MC-IHDCrdquo
DILG MC 2004-152 ldquoGuide to LGUs in the
Localization of the MDGsrdquo
MTPDP 2004-2010 hews
closely to the MDGs
Strong commitment
of the business
sector and civil society
Investment identification per goal and target in MTPIP
2005-2010
Strong support of
donor community
for the MDGs
Legislative support of Congress
Enabling Environment for the MDGs
Poverty Situation
FIGURE 1 Poverty Incidence of Population by Region 2003
Legend
Below national average (73 - 304)Above national average(305 - 542)
Source
NSO Family Income and Expenditures Survey 2003
ARMM 531
Cordillera Region 312
Metro Manila 73
Ilocos Region 302
Cagayan Valley 245
Central Luzon 177
CALABARZON 188
MIMAROPA 479
Bicol Region 484
Western Visayas 391
Central Visayas 284
Eastern Visayas 433
Western Mindanao 494
Northern Mindanao 443
Southern Mindanao 344
Central Mindanao 384
CARAGA 542
Annual Per Capita Poverty Threshold Poverty Incidence of Families and Population by Region 2000 and 2003
2000 Revised 2003 2000 Revised 2003 2000 Revised 2003Philippines 11 451 12 267 275 247 330 304NCR 15 693 16 796 57 50 76 73CAR 13 066 13 976 307 248 376 312Region I 12 685 13 276 294 244 351 302Region II 11 128 11 409 252 193 304 245Region III 13 760 14 342 173 137 214 177Region IV-A 13 657 14 616 152 149 191 188Region IV-B 11 995 12 406 363 397 452 479Region V 11 372 12 354 453 405 526 484Region VI 11 313 12 275 366 313 444 391Region VII 9 656 9 779 315 237 362 284Region VIII 9 518 10 802 375 355 451 433Region IX 9 116 10 414 385 441 448 494Region X 10 503 11 609 379 379 438 443Region XI 10 264 11 276 277 281 331 344Region XII 10 466 11 303 407 320 468 384Caraga 10 896 12 000 437 473 509 542ARMM 12 192 12 739 537 457 598 531
Poverty Incidenceof Population ()Region
Annual Per Capita PovertyThreshold (in Pesos)
Poverty Incidenceof Families ()
FIGURE 2 Subsistence Incidence of Population by Region 2003
Legend
Below national average Above national average
Source
NSO_Family and Income Expenditure Study 2003
ARMM 241
Cordillera Region 134
Metro Manila 06
Ilocos Region 112
Cagayan Valley 76
Central Luzon 42
CALABARZON 49
MIMAROPA 229
Bicol Region 266
Western Visayas 177
Central Visayas 146
Eastern Visayas 21
Western Mindanao 328
Northern Mindanao 254
Southern Mindanao 176
Central Mindanao 184
CARAGA 31
Annual Per Capita Food Threshold Subsistence Incidence of Families and Population by Region 2000 and 2003
2000 Revised 2003 2000 Revised 2003 2000 Revised 2003Philippines 7 707 8 134 123 104 158 138NCR 9 570 9 974 07 04 10 06CAR 8 744 9 117 137 98 179 134Region I 8 552 8 903 114 81 152 112Region II 7 560 8 026 93 56 118 76Region III 8 764 9 338 42 29 55 42Region IV-A 8 782 9 189 51 37 65 49Region IV-B 8 078 8 339 174 177 241 229Region V 8 047 8 372 233 203 293 266Region VI 7 983 8 386 174 129 231 177Region VII 6 759 7 016 169 112 207 146Region VIII 7 080 7 696 191 155 248 210Region IX 6 574 7 245 210 279 258 328Region X 7 296 7 999 192 197 238 254Region XI 7 087 7 751 128 135 167 176Region XII 7 235 7 804 179 140 226 184Caraga 7 667 8 353 244 245 307 310ARMM 8 313 8 737 239 186 285 241
RegionAnnual Per Capita Food Subsistence Incidence Subsistence Incidence
Threshold (in Pesos) of Families () of Population ()
FIGURE 3 Gini Concentration Ratios by Region 2003
Legend
Below National AverageAbove National Average
ARMM 03464
Cordillera Region 04294
Metro Manila 0413
Ilocos Region 03968
Cagayan Valley 04411
Central Luzon 03486
CALABARZON 04058
MIMAROPA 04354
Bicol Region 04648
Western Visayas 04392
Central Visayas 04711
Eastern Visayas 04577
Western Mindanao 05197
Northern Mindanao 04768
Southern Mindanao 04583
Central Mindanao 04567
CARAGA 04294
Gini Coefficient Among Families by Region 2000 and 2003
Region2000 2003 Change
Philippines 04822 04660 -16NCR 04451 04130 -32CAR 04439 04294 -15Region I 04071 03968 -10Region II 04227 04411 18Region III 03591 03486 -11Region IV-A 04086 04058 -03Region IV-B 04076 04354 28Region V 04455 04648 19Region VI 04594 04392 -20Region VII 04691 04711 02Region VIII 04807 04577 -23Region IX 04732 05197 47Region X 04794 04768 -03Region XI 04318 04567 25Region XII 04631 04583 -05Caraga 04118 04294 18ARMM 03171 03464 29
GINI
FIGURE 4 Percentage of Households with Less than 100 Energy Adequacy
FIGURE 5 Percentage of Underweight Children 0-5 Year Olds
Meeting Goal 1 Eradicate Extreme Poverty and Hunger
Priority Policies and Programs
bull Kapit-Bisig Laban sa Kahirapan (KALAHI)
bull Enrolment of 7 million beneficiaries under the National Health Insurance Program (NHIP)
bull Wholesale portfolio of the Peoplersquos Credit and Finance Corporation (PCFC)
bull Implementation of asset reform programs
bull Delivery of human development services
MDGs Amount
(in US$ million)
Share to Total MDG-
Related ODA
1 - Eradicate extreme poverty amp hunger 62594 7740
2 - Achieve universal primary education 5579 690
3 - Promote gender equality 38 005
4 - Reduce child mortality 1399 173
5 - Improve maternal health 1570 194
6 - Combat HIVAIDS malaria amp other diseases 253 031
7 - Ensure environmental sustainability 94331 1167
TOTAL 80866 10000
Summary of ODA for completed amp ongoing projects by MDG category from 2001-2005 in million US$
Source NEDA-PMS
ODA for MDGs
INVESTMENTS SUPPORTIVE OF THE MDGs 2005-2010
MDGs COST
(in PhP Billion)
1 - Eradicate extreme poverty amp hunger 129422 - Achieve universal primary education 5673 - Promote gender equality -4 - Reduce child mortality
6995 - Improve maternal health
6 - Combat HIVAIDS malaria amp other diseases
7 - Ensure environmental sustainability 19888 ndash Global partnership for development 1251
TOTAL 17447
Source NEDA-PIS
INTENSIFYING MULTISECTORAL PARTNERSHIP AND COLLABORATION
Government (executive legislature judicial)
Local Government
CSOsAcademe
Local Government
PrivateBusiness
Donor Community
Environmental Situationand Challenges
Goal 7 Ensure Environmental Sustainability
bull Forests resources and watersheds
bull Biodiversity resources
bull Coastal and marine resources
bull Air quality
bull Water resources
bull Waste and toxic chemicals
Area Proportion to Total
(Hectares) ()
7168400 100
2560872 36
Broadleaved 2448864
Mixed 24618
Coniferous 87390
4030588 56
Broadleaved 3847284
Mixed 69861
Coniferous 113443
247362 3
329578 5Source Forest Management Bureau (FMB)
Total Forest
Mangrove
Plantation
Forest Cover by Forest Type 2003
Closed Forest
Open Forest
Category
Area Reforested 1990-2003 (in hectares)Year Total
Government
Percent Non-Government
Percent
Sector
2003 15087 13195 875 1892 125
2002 25620 20682 807 4938 193
2001 31440 26524 844 4916 156
2000 27632 21740 787 5892 213
1999 42165 31183 74 10982 26
1998 42368 33219 784 9149 216
1997 66236 49301 744 16935 256
1996 46096 18869 409 27227 591
1995 65233 21841 335 43392 665
1994 49551 18032 364 31519 636
1993 19211 6347 33 12864 67
1992 40593 24304 599 16289 401
1991 93039 73602 791 19437 209
1990 191663 153949 803 37714 197
Annual Average
53995
Source DENR Annual Report
Biodiversity Resources
Philippineshellip one of the megadiverse countries in the
world higher regard for the endemism of local
species
buthellip most severely threatened of the
megadiverse countries
Coastal and Marine Resources rich sources of fish and aquatic products habitat for countless underwater wildlife natural areas for recreationtourism Water resourcesbull disparities in water supply coverage across regionsbull depletion of ground water especially in Metro
Manila and Metro Cebubull pollution of water sources
Air Qualitybull pollution remains a problem in Metro Manila and
major urban centersbull on the level of suspended particulates (TSP) air
quality is not within standards
Waste and Toxic Chemicalsbull solid waste generation in Metro Manila is estimated at
5345 tons per daybull urbanization inevitably increased the use of chemicalsbull no integrated treatment facility for hazardous waste
Priority Policies and Programs
bull Adoption of Sustainable Forest Management
bull Revised Forestry Code of the Philippines and the Watersheds Code
bull Various biodiversity acts
bull Fisheries Code and AFMA
bull Clean Air Act
Challenges and Priorities for Action
bull Sustainable and more productive utilization of natural resources
bull Focus and strengthen the protection of vulnerable and ecologically fragile areas
bull Create healthier environment for the populationbull Mitigate the occurrence of natural disasters bull Ensure environmental accountability for all
industries
CROSS-CUTTING CHALLENGEShellip
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005
Government Expenditure Program by Sector FY 2000-2005
Social Services Debt Service Economic Services General Public Services Defense
CROSSCUTTING CHALLENGES AND PRIORITIES FOR ACTION
Source DBM Budget of Expenditure and Sources of Financing
FINANCING THE MDGs
SectorYear 2001 2002 2003 2004
Economic Services 15982070 45484830 52853500 58700890
(15) (32) (33) (34)Social Services 28979110 26352690 34001700 36135990
(27) (19) (21) (21)General Public Services 63375820 69580140 73954470 78545740
(58) (49) (46) (45)Total Public Expenditures 108337000 141417660 160809670 173382620
FINANCING THE MDGs
Distribution of Public Expenditures by Local Government UnitsBy Sector 2001-2004 (in thousand pesos)
Source DBM Budget of Expenditure and Sources of Financing
CROSSCUTTING CHALLENGES AND PRIORITIES FOR ACTION
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
2001 2002 2003 2004
ODA Commitments by SectorFY 2001-2004 (US$ million)
Agriculture agrarianreform and naturalresources
Governance andinstitutionsdevelopment
Infrastructuredevelopment
Social reform anddevelopment
Industry and services
Source NEDA-PIS
CROSSCUTTING CHALLENGES AND PRIORITIES FOR ACTION
FINANCING THE MDGs
CROSS-CUTTING CHALLENGES AND
PRIORITIES FOR ACTIONbull Reduce disparities across regions
bull Increase resource allocation for MDG-related programs and projects
bull Enforce fullstricter implementation of laws amp ensure passage of MDG-supportive bills
bull Strengthen monitoring and implementation
bull Scale-up campaign for localization
bull Develop an advocacy plan
bull Intensify multisectoral partnership amp collaboration
Facilitating Factors bull Strong global support for MDGs by the United
Nations ASEAN and other multilateral organizations
bull Expanding national support among policymakers for MDGs (eg creation of the House Committee on MDGs issuance of EO on the MDGs)
bull Prioritization of MDGs in resource allocation (eg focusing of MTPIP investments on MDGs)
bull Increasing awareness and participation of private sector LGUs in MDG-related programs
Hindering Factors
bull Resource constraints (ie MDG financing gap of about $15 billion yearly)
bull Lack of support by creditors for the Debt for MDG ProjectsDebt for Equity in MDG Projects initiative
bull Low budgetary priority for MDGs accorded by some LGUs and
bull Lack of disaggregated data to monitor MDGs at local levels
Parallel Initiatives
Participation in the High-Level Plenary Meeting on MDGs
Formulation of the Plan of Action for Poverty Reduction (2006-2010)Enhance the current Poverty Reduction
Strategy and Program Framework
Advocacy for the Philippine proposal on Debt for Equity in MDG Projects
Implications on the Philippine Economy
MDG attainment would requirebull Enhanced revenue generationbull LGU private sector and civil society supportbull Expansion of microfinance services for the poorbull Pursuit of projects with high economic impactbull Right-sizing the bureaucracybull Privatization andbull Tapping OFW remittances
1048707 The country is still dependent on agriculture fishing and forestry but at the same time an emerging global market for business process ICT spare parts medical services to name a few and this will require 51 DepEdrsquos implementation of a more relevant basic education curriculum in relation to local and global needs
Social Factors
1048707 The increasing percentage of school-age population requires thegovernment to effectively and efficiently implement fiscal reforms as thiswill have major implications in attaining the goal of education for all Inthis regard DepEd should actively participate in advocating for efficienttax revenue collection Moreover mobilization of resources from localgovernments private sector and other partners will also help thecountry finance the increasing budgetary requirements of EFA
Language and Cultural Factors With different ethnic and Muslim groups spread across country ndash
effective implementation of the curriculum indigenization policy and national curriculum for Muslim education is imperative
1048707 With more than 111 dialects spoken there is a need to revisit the current policy on medium of instruction effective nationwide implementation of the use of the mother tongue or the childrsquos language as medium for instruction in pre-school and the first two grades in the elementary level
Geographical and geophysical factors
1048707 Considering the huge size of the basic education system (over40000 public schools in 7107 islands) the applications of moderninformation and communication technology may offer the onlyfeasible medium for delivering high-quality instruction to millions oflearners in a large diverse and geographically dispersed population1048707 DepEd must seriously consider adopting a flexible school calendar ndasheg first three months of the school calendar (June to August) are the rainy months with frequent flooding in Metro Manila supervision of schools is very difficult and dangerous during the rainy and typhoon season
1048707 There is need to adopt differentiated designs for school facilities to withstand natural calamities such as typhoons and earthquakes
bull C Reaching the Un-reached and Underserved Groups of Learners
bull 144 Providing children in difficultdifferent circumstances access to quality and
bull relevant basic education is still a big challenge that the country should immediately
bull address To witbull bull Children Engaged in Labor DepEd needs to intensify
the implementation of itsbull distance learning program both for elementary and
secondary levels so thatbull schoolchildren who really need to work to earn a living
could still continuebull schooling even without regularly attending classes
bull bull Street Children
bull DepEd needs to establish a strong partnership with other
bull government agencies and other partners (NGOs privatebusiness sectorLGUs)
bull in providing basic education and other social and livelihood services to street children and their families (the main objective of the latter services is to sustain childrenrsquos schooling)
bull bull Children with Special Needs (Gifted and Differently-abled)
bull With the limited coverage of existing government educational facilities DepEd together with other agencies and partners need to work on the expansion of basic education services to reach more persons with disability DepEd should specifically work on
bull the strengthening and expansion of its SPED classes in the existing public
bull elementary and secondary schools and the strengthening and enrichment of its regular classes to mainstream the people with disabilities
(1990 or Level 2015 Attaining theMDG year closest (20022004) 1 Targets
to 1990) 2
Eradicate extreme poverty and hunger underweight among 0-5 yo children 345 276 1725 MediumAchieve universal primary education
Elementary participation rate 3 851 a 9005 100 MediumImprove maternal healthMaternal mortality rate 209 172 c 522 Medium
Increase access to RH servicesContraceptive prevalence rate 40 b 489 70 Medium
Achieve universal primary education
Elementary cohort survival rate 684 a 698 833 Low
Muslim Children With the big percentage (93) of Muslim school-age population in the public school system the effective implementation of the national curriculum for Muslim education in the public school system is verycritical The overall goal of the curriculum is to develop the core competencies of Muslim children in order for them to function effectively in society within thecontext of their environment and culture and that of the wider community In the long run it will hopefully effectively address the economic social political problems in Muslim-dominated areas and the entire country in general
bull Children in Conflict-Affected Areas Convergence of support for the protection ofchildren especially those who are not educated from being vulnerable targets fortraining and indoctrination as fighters There is also a need to execute acovenant among and between concerned parties to protect schools as ldquopeacezonesrdquo
In summary the country was not able to attain its 2005 targets in almost all key outcome indicators in Early Childhood Education Formal Basic Education and Alternative Learning System
Most of the regions have performance classified asldquofalling further behindrdquo or with performance lower than the national level in 2002 and continued to decline in 2005 While substantial investments were poured into the establishment of basic education facilities these were not enough to ensure that all3-5 year olds are in Early Childhood Education learning centers and all school-aged children were in school and able to continue and eventually complete basic education with satisfactory achievement level The basic education system should 53 be responsive to the differentiated needs of learners where a ldquoone-size fit allrdquo or conventional interventions (such as construction of classrooms provision of textbooks etc) are not enough or will no longer work
MDG attainment would requireEnhanced revenue generationLGU private sector and civil society supportPursuit of projects with high economic impactandTapping OFW remittances
Working towards achieving one Goal will make us closer to achievement of the rest amp would reduce costs of achieving othersrdquo Eveline Herfkens
SDC Res No 1 2003 ldquoExpanding
functions and composition of
MC-IHDCrdquo
DILG MC 2004-152 ldquoGuide to LGUs in the
Localization of the MDGsrdquo
MTPDP 2004-2010 hews
closely to the MDGs
Strong commitment
of the business
sector and civil society
Investment identification per goal and target in MTPIP
2005-2010
Strong support of
donor community
for the MDGs
Legislative support of Congress
Enabling Environment for the MDGs
Poverty Situation
FIGURE 1 Poverty Incidence of Population by Region 2003
Legend
Below national average (73 - 304)Above national average(305 - 542)
Source
NSO Family Income and Expenditures Survey 2003
ARMM 531
Cordillera Region 312
Metro Manila 73
Ilocos Region 302
Cagayan Valley 245
Central Luzon 177
CALABARZON 188
MIMAROPA 479
Bicol Region 484
Western Visayas 391
Central Visayas 284
Eastern Visayas 433
Western Mindanao 494
Northern Mindanao 443
Southern Mindanao 344
Central Mindanao 384
CARAGA 542
Annual Per Capita Poverty Threshold Poverty Incidence of Families and Population by Region 2000 and 2003
2000 Revised 2003 2000 Revised 2003 2000 Revised 2003Philippines 11 451 12 267 275 247 330 304NCR 15 693 16 796 57 50 76 73CAR 13 066 13 976 307 248 376 312Region I 12 685 13 276 294 244 351 302Region II 11 128 11 409 252 193 304 245Region III 13 760 14 342 173 137 214 177Region IV-A 13 657 14 616 152 149 191 188Region IV-B 11 995 12 406 363 397 452 479Region V 11 372 12 354 453 405 526 484Region VI 11 313 12 275 366 313 444 391Region VII 9 656 9 779 315 237 362 284Region VIII 9 518 10 802 375 355 451 433Region IX 9 116 10 414 385 441 448 494Region X 10 503 11 609 379 379 438 443Region XI 10 264 11 276 277 281 331 344Region XII 10 466 11 303 407 320 468 384Caraga 10 896 12 000 437 473 509 542ARMM 12 192 12 739 537 457 598 531
Poverty Incidenceof Population ()Region
Annual Per Capita PovertyThreshold (in Pesos)
Poverty Incidenceof Families ()
FIGURE 2 Subsistence Incidence of Population by Region 2003
Legend
Below national average Above national average
Source
NSO_Family and Income Expenditure Study 2003
ARMM 241
Cordillera Region 134
Metro Manila 06
Ilocos Region 112
Cagayan Valley 76
Central Luzon 42
CALABARZON 49
MIMAROPA 229
Bicol Region 266
Western Visayas 177
Central Visayas 146
Eastern Visayas 21
Western Mindanao 328
Northern Mindanao 254
Southern Mindanao 176
Central Mindanao 184
CARAGA 31
Annual Per Capita Food Threshold Subsistence Incidence of Families and Population by Region 2000 and 2003
2000 Revised 2003 2000 Revised 2003 2000 Revised 2003Philippines 7 707 8 134 123 104 158 138NCR 9 570 9 974 07 04 10 06CAR 8 744 9 117 137 98 179 134Region I 8 552 8 903 114 81 152 112Region II 7 560 8 026 93 56 118 76Region III 8 764 9 338 42 29 55 42Region IV-A 8 782 9 189 51 37 65 49Region IV-B 8 078 8 339 174 177 241 229Region V 8 047 8 372 233 203 293 266Region VI 7 983 8 386 174 129 231 177Region VII 6 759 7 016 169 112 207 146Region VIII 7 080 7 696 191 155 248 210Region IX 6 574 7 245 210 279 258 328Region X 7 296 7 999 192 197 238 254Region XI 7 087 7 751 128 135 167 176Region XII 7 235 7 804 179 140 226 184Caraga 7 667 8 353 244 245 307 310ARMM 8 313 8 737 239 186 285 241
RegionAnnual Per Capita Food Subsistence Incidence Subsistence Incidence
Threshold (in Pesos) of Families () of Population ()
FIGURE 3 Gini Concentration Ratios by Region 2003
Legend
Below National AverageAbove National Average
ARMM 03464
Cordillera Region 04294
Metro Manila 0413
Ilocos Region 03968
Cagayan Valley 04411
Central Luzon 03486
CALABARZON 04058
MIMAROPA 04354
Bicol Region 04648
Western Visayas 04392
Central Visayas 04711
Eastern Visayas 04577
Western Mindanao 05197
Northern Mindanao 04768
Southern Mindanao 04583
Central Mindanao 04567
CARAGA 04294
Gini Coefficient Among Families by Region 2000 and 2003
Region2000 2003 Change
Philippines 04822 04660 -16NCR 04451 04130 -32CAR 04439 04294 -15Region I 04071 03968 -10Region II 04227 04411 18Region III 03591 03486 -11Region IV-A 04086 04058 -03Region IV-B 04076 04354 28Region V 04455 04648 19Region VI 04594 04392 -20Region VII 04691 04711 02Region VIII 04807 04577 -23Region IX 04732 05197 47Region X 04794 04768 -03Region XI 04318 04567 25Region XII 04631 04583 -05Caraga 04118 04294 18ARMM 03171 03464 29
GINI
FIGURE 4 Percentage of Households with Less than 100 Energy Adequacy
FIGURE 5 Percentage of Underweight Children 0-5 Year Olds
Meeting Goal 1 Eradicate Extreme Poverty and Hunger
Priority Policies and Programs
bull Kapit-Bisig Laban sa Kahirapan (KALAHI)
bull Enrolment of 7 million beneficiaries under the National Health Insurance Program (NHIP)
bull Wholesale portfolio of the Peoplersquos Credit and Finance Corporation (PCFC)
bull Implementation of asset reform programs
bull Delivery of human development services
MDGs Amount
(in US$ million)
Share to Total MDG-
Related ODA
1 - Eradicate extreme poverty amp hunger 62594 7740
2 - Achieve universal primary education 5579 690
3 - Promote gender equality 38 005
4 - Reduce child mortality 1399 173
5 - Improve maternal health 1570 194
6 - Combat HIVAIDS malaria amp other diseases 253 031
7 - Ensure environmental sustainability 94331 1167
TOTAL 80866 10000
Summary of ODA for completed amp ongoing projects by MDG category from 2001-2005 in million US$
Source NEDA-PMS
ODA for MDGs
INVESTMENTS SUPPORTIVE OF THE MDGs 2005-2010
MDGs COST
(in PhP Billion)
1 - Eradicate extreme poverty amp hunger 129422 - Achieve universal primary education 5673 - Promote gender equality -4 - Reduce child mortality
6995 - Improve maternal health
6 - Combat HIVAIDS malaria amp other diseases
7 - Ensure environmental sustainability 19888 ndash Global partnership for development 1251
TOTAL 17447
Source NEDA-PIS
INTENSIFYING MULTISECTORAL PARTNERSHIP AND COLLABORATION
Government (executive legislature judicial)
Local Government
CSOsAcademe
Local Government
PrivateBusiness
Donor Community
Environmental Situationand Challenges
Goal 7 Ensure Environmental Sustainability
bull Forests resources and watersheds
bull Biodiversity resources
bull Coastal and marine resources
bull Air quality
bull Water resources
bull Waste and toxic chemicals
Area Proportion to Total
(Hectares) ()
7168400 100
2560872 36
Broadleaved 2448864
Mixed 24618
Coniferous 87390
4030588 56
Broadleaved 3847284
Mixed 69861
Coniferous 113443
247362 3
329578 5Source Forest Management Bureau (FMB)
Total Forest
Mangrove
Plantation
Forest Cover by Forest Type 2003
Closed Forest
Open Forest
Category
Area Reforested 1990-2003 (in hectares)Year Total
Government
Percent Non-Government
Percent
Sector
2003 15087 13195 875 1892 125
2002 25620 20682 807 4938 193
2001 31440 26524 844 4916 156
2000 27632 21740 787 5892 213
1999 42165 31183 74 10982 26
1998 42368 33219 784 9149 216
1997 66236 49301 744 16935 256
1996 46096 18869 409 27227 591
1995 65233 21841 335 43392 665
1994 49551 18032 364 31519 636
1993 19211 6347 33 12864 67
1992 40593 24304 599 16289 401
1991 93039 73602 791 19437 209
1990 191663 153949 803 37714 197
Annual Average
53995
Source DENR Annual Report
Biodiversity Resources
Philippineshellip one of the megadiverse countries in the
world higher regard for the endemism of local
species
buthellip most severely threatened of the
megadiverse countries
Coastal and Marine Resources rich sources of fish and aquatic products habitat for countless underwater wildlife natural areas for recreationtourism Water resourcesbull disparities in water supply coverage across regionsbull depletion of ground water especially in Metro
Manila and Metro Cebubull pollution of water sources
Air Qualitybull pollution remains a problem in Metro Manila and
major urban centersbull on the level of suspended particulates (TSP) air
quality is not within standards
Waste and Toxic Chemicalsbull solid waste generation in Metro Manila is estimated at
5345 tons per daybull urbanization inevitably increased the use of chemicalsbull no integrated treatment facility for hazardous waste
Priority Policies and Programs
bull Adoption of Sustainable Forest Management
bull Revised Forestry Code of the Philippines and the Watersheds Code
bull Various biodiversity acts
bull Fisheries Code and AFMA
bull Clean Air Act
Challenges and Priorities for Action
bull Sustainable and more productive utilization of natural resources
bull Focus and strengthen the protection of vulnerable and ecologically fragile areas
bull Create healthier environment for the populationbull Mitigate the occurrence of natural disasters bull Ensure environmental accountability for all
industries
CROSS-CUTTING CHALLENGEShellip
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005
Government Expenditure Program by Sector FY 2000-2005
Social Services Debt Service Economic Services General Public Services Defense
CROSSCUTTING CHALLENGES AND PRIORITIES FOR ACTION
Source DBM Budget of Expenditure and Sources of Financing
FINANCING THE MDGs
SectorYear 2001 2002 2003 2004
Economic Services 15982070 45484830 52853500 58700890
(15) (32) (33) (34)Social Services 28979110 26352690 34001700 36135990
(27) (19) (21) (21)General Public Services 63375820 69580140 73954470 78545740
(58) (49) (46) (45)Total Public Expenditures 108337000 141417660 160809670 173382620
FINANCING THE MDGs
Distribution of Public Expenditures by Local Government UnitsBy Sector 2001-2004 (in thousand pesos)
Source DBM Budget of Expenditure and Sources of Financing
CROSSCUTTING CHALLENGES AND PRIORITIES FOR ACTION
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
2001 2002 2003 2004
ODA Commitments by SectorFY 2001-2004 (US$ million)
Agriculture agrarianreform and naturalresources
Governance andinstitutionsdevelopment
Infrastructuredevelopment
Social reform anddevelopment
Industry and services
Source NEDA-PIS
CROSSCUTTING CHALLENGES AND PRIORITIES FOR ACTION
FINANCING THE MDGs
CROSS-CUTTING CHALLENGES AND
PRIORITIES FOR ACTIONbull Reduce disparities across regions
bull Increase resource allocation for MDG-related programs and projects
bull Enforce fullstricter implementation of laws amp ensure passage of MDG-supportive bills
bull Strengthen monitoring and implementation
bull Scale-up campaign for localization
bull Develop an advocacy plan
bull Intensify multisectoral partnership amp collaboration
Facilitating Factors bull Strong global support for MDGs by the United
Nations ASEAN and other multilateral organizations
bull Expanding national support among policymakers for MDGs (eg creation of the House Committee on MDGs issuance of EO on the MDGs)
bull Prioritization of MDGs in resource allocation (eg focusing of MTPIP investments on MDGs)
bull Increasing awareness and participation of private sector LGUs in MDG-related programs
Hindering Factors
bull Resource constraints (ie MDG financing gap of about $15 billion yearly)
bull Lack of support by creditors for the Debt for MDG ProjectsDebt for Equity in MDG Projects initiative
bull Low budgetary priority for MDGs accorded by some LGUs and
bull Lack of disaggregated data to monitor MDGs at local levels
Parallel Initiatives
Participation in the High-Level Plenary Meeting on MDGs
Formulation of the Plan of Action for Poverty Reduction (2006-2010)Enhance the current Poverty Reduction
Strategy and Program Framework
Advocacy for the Philippine proposal on Debt for Equity in MDG Projects
Implications on the Philippine Economy
MDG attainment would requirebull Enhanced revenue generationbull LGU private sector and civil society supportbull Expansion of microfinance services for the poorbull Pursuit of projects with high economic impactbull Right-sizing the bureaucracybull Privatization andbull Tapping OFW remittances
Language and Cultural Factors With different ethnic and Muslim groups spread across country ndash
effective implementation of the curriculum indigenization policy and national curriculum for Muslim education is imperative
1048707 With more than 111 dialects spoken there is a need to revisit the current policy on medium of instruction effective nationwide implementation of the use of the mother tongue or the childrsquos language as medium for instruction in pre-school and the first two grades in the elementary level
Geographical and geophysical factors
1048707 Considering the huge size of the basic education system (over40000 public schools in 7107 islands) the applications of moderninformation and communication technology may offer the onlyfeasible medium for delivering high-quality instruction to millions oflearners in a large diverse and geographically dispersed population1048707 DepEd must seriously consider adopting a flexible school calendar ndasheg first three months of the school calendar (June to August) are the rainy months with frequent flooding in Metro Manila supervision of schools is very difficult and dangerous during the rainy and typhoon season
1048707 There is need to adopt differentiated designs for school facilities to withstand natural calamities such as typhoons and earthquakes
bull C Reaching the Un-reached and Underserved Groups of Learners
bull 144 Providing children in difficultdifferent circumstances access to quality and
bull relevant basic education is still a big challenge that the country should immediately
bull address To witbull bull Children Engaged in Labor DepEd needs to intensify
the implementation of itsbull distance learning program both for elementary and
secondary levels so thatbull schoolchildren who really need to work to earn a living
could still continuebull schooling even without regularly attending classes
bull bull Street Children
bull DepEd needs to establish a strong partnership with other
bull government agencies and other partners (NGOs privatebusiness sectorLGUs)
bull in providing basic education and other social and livelihood services to street children and their families (the main objective of the latter services is to sustain childrenrsquos schooling)
bull bull Children with Special Needs (Gifted and Differently-abled)
bull With the limited coverage of existing government educational facilities DepEd together with other agencies and partners need to work on the expansion of basic education services to reach more persons with disability DepEd should specifically work on
bull the strengthening and expansion of its SPED classes in the existing public
bull elementary and secondary schools and the strengthening and enrichment of its regular classes to mainstream the people with disabilities
(1990 or Level 2015 Attaining theMDG year closest (20022004) 1 Targets
to 1990) 2
Eradicate extreme poverty and hunger underweight among 0-5 yo children 345 276 1725 MediumAchieve universal primary education
Elementary participation rate 3 851 a 9005 100 MediumImprove maternal healthMaternal mortality rate 209 172 c 522 Medium
Increase access to RH servicesContraceptive prevalence rate 40 b 489 70 Medium
Achieve universal primary education
Elementary cohort survival rate 684 a 698 833 Low
Muslim Children With the big percentage (93) of Muslim school-age population in the public school system the effective implementation of the national curriculum for Muslim education in the public school system is verycritical The overall goal of the curriculum is to develop the core competencies of Muslim children in order for them to function effectively in society within thecontext of their environment and culture and that of the wider community In the long run it will hopefully effectively address the economic social political problems in Muslim-dominated areas and the entire country in general
bull Children in Conflict-Affected Areas Convergence of support for the protection ofchildren especially those who are not educated from being vulnerable targets fortraining and indoctrination as fighters There is also a need to execute acovenant among and between concerned parties to protect schools as ldquopeacezonesrdquo
In summary the country was not able to attain its 2005 targets in almost all key outcome indicators in Early Childhood Education Formal Basic Education and Alternative Learning System
Most of the regions have performance classified asldquofalling further behindrdquo or with performance lower than the national level in 2002 and continued to decline in 2005 While substantial investments were poured into the establishment of basic education facilities these were not enough to ensure that all3-5 year olds are in Early Childhood Education learning centers and all school-aged children were in school and able to continue and eventually complete basic education with satisfactory achievement level The basic education system should 53 be responsive to the differentiated needs of learners where a ldquoone-size fit allrdquo or conventional interventions (such as construction of classrooms provision of textbooks etc) are not enough or will no longer work
MDG attainment would requireEnhanced revenue generationLGU private sector and civil society supportPursuit of projects with high economic impactandTapping OFW remittances
Working towards achieving one Goal will make us closer to achievement of the rest amp would reduce costs of achieving othersrdquo Eveline Herfkens
SDC Res No 1 2003 ldquoExpanding
functions and composition of
MC-IHDCrdquo
DILG MC 2004-152 ldquoGuide to LGUs in the
Localization of the MDGsrdquo
MTPDP 2004-2010 hews
closely to the MDGs
Strong commitment
of the business
sector and civil society
Investment identification per goal and target in MTPIP
2005-2010
Strong support of
donor community
for the MDGs
Legislative support of Congress
Enabling Environment for the MDGs
Poverty Situation
FIGURE 1 Poverty Incidence of Population by Region 2003
Legend
Below national average (73 - 304)Above national average(305 - 542)
Source
NSO Family Income and Expenditures Survey 2003
ARMM 531
Cordillera Region 312
Metro Manila 73
Ilocos Region 302
Cagayan Valley 245
Central Luzon 177
CALABARZON 188
MIMAROPA 479
Bicol Region 484
Western Visayas 391
Central Visayas 284
Eastern Visayas 433
Western Mindanao 494
Northern Mindanao 443
Southern Mindanao 344
Central Mindanao 384
CARAGA 542
Annual Per Capita Poverty Threshold Poverty Incidence of Families and Population by Region 2000 and 2003
2000 Revised 2003 2000 Revised 2003 2000 Revised 2003Philippines 11 451 12 267 275 247 330 304NCR 15 693 16 796 57 50 76 73CAR 13 066 13 976 307 248 376 312Region I 12 685 13 276 294 244 351 302Region II 11 128 11 409 252 193 304 245Region III 13 760 14 342 173 137 214 177Region IV-A 13 657 14 616 152 149 191 188Region IV-B 11 995 12 406 363 397 452 479Region V 11 372 12 354 453 405 526 484Region VI 11 313 12 275 366 313 444 391Region VII 9 656 9 779 315 237 362 284Region VIII 9 518 10 802 375 355 451 433Region IX 9 116 10 414 385 441 448 494Region X 10 503 11 609 379 379 438 443Region XI 10 264 11 276 277 281 331 344Region XII 10 466 11 303 407 320 468 384Caraga 10 896 12 000 437 473 509 542ARMM 12 192 12 739 537 457 598 531
Poverty Incidenceof Population ()Region
Annual Per Capita PovertyThreshold (in Pesos)
Poverty Incidenceof Families ()
FIGURE 2 Subsistence Incidence of Population by Region 2003
Legend
Below national average Above national average
Source
NSO_Family and Income Expenditure Study 2003
ARMM 241
Cordillera Region 134
Metro Manila 06
Ilocos Region 112
Cagayan Valley 76
Central Luzon 42
CALABARZON 49
MIMAROPA 229
Bicol Region 266
Western Visayas 177
Central Visayas 146
Eastern Visayas 21
Western Mindanao 328
Northern Mindanao 254
Southern Mindanao 176
Central Mindanao 184
CARAGA 31
Annual Per Capita Food Threshold Subsistence Incidence of Families and Population by Region 2000 and 2003
2000 Revised 2003 2000 Revised 2003 2000 Revised 2003Philippines 7 707 8 134 123 104 158 138NCR 9 570 9 974 07 04 10 06CAR 8 744 9 117 137 98 179 134Region I 8 552 8 903 114 81 152 112Region II 7 560 8 026 93 56 118 76Region III 8 764 9 338 42 29 55 42Region IV-A 8 782 9 189 51 37 65 49Region IV-B 8 078 8 339 174 177 241 229Region V 8 047 8 372 233 203 293 266Region VI 7 983 8 386 174 129 231 177Region VII 6 759 7 016 169 112 207 146Region VIII 7 080 7 696 191 155 248 210Region IX 6 574 7 245 210 279 258 328Region X 7 296 7 999 192 197 238 254Region XI 7 087 7 751 128 135 167 176Region XII 7 235 7 804 179 140 226 184Caraga 7 667 8 353 244 245 307 310ARMM 8 313 8 737 239 186 285 241
RegionAnnual Per Capita Food Subsistence Incidence Subsistence Incidence
Threshold (in Pesos) of Families () of Population ()
FIGURE 3 Gini Concentration Ratios by Region 2003
Legend
Below National AverageAbove National Average
ARMM 03464
Cordillera Region 04294
Metro Manila 0413
Ilocos Region 03968
Cagayan Valley 04411
Central Luzon 03486
CALABARZON 04058
MIMAROPA 04354
Bicol Region 04648
Western Visayas 04392
Central Visayas 04711
Eastern Visayas 04577
Western Mindanao 05197
Northern Mindanao 04768
Southern Mindanao 04583
Central Mindanao 04567
CARAGA 04294
Gini Coefficient Among Families by Region 2000 and 2003
Region2000 2003 Change
Philippines 04822 04660 -16NCR 04451 04130 -32CAR 04439 04294 -15Region I 04071 03968 -10Region II 04227 04411 18Region III 03591 03486 -11Region IV-A 04086 04058 -03Region IV-B 04076 04354 28Region V 04455 04648 19Region VI 04594 04392 -20Region VII 04691 04711 02Region VIII 04807 04577 -23Region IX 04732 05197 47Region X 04794 04768 -03Region XI 04318 04567 25Region XII 04631 04583 -05Caraga 04118 04294 18ARMM 03171 03464 29
GINI
FIGURE 4 Percentage of Households with Less than 100 Energy Adequacy
FIGURE 5 Percentage of Underweight Children 0-5 Year Olds
Meeting Goal 1 Eradicate Extreme Poverty and Hunger
Priority Policies and Programs
bull Kapit-Bisig Laban sa Kahirapan (KALAHI)
bull Enrolment of 7 million beneficiaries under the National Health Insurance Program (NHIP)
bull Wholesale portfolio of the Peoplersquos Credit and Finance Corporation (PCFC)
bull Implementation of asset reform programs
bull Delivery of human development services
MDGs Amount
(in US$ million)
Share to Total MDG-
Related ODA
1 - Eradicate extreme poverty amp hunger 62594 7740
2 - Achieve universal primary education 5579 690
3 - Promote gender equality 38 005
4 - Reduce child mortality 1399 173
5 - Improve maternal health 1570 194
6 - Combat HIVAIDS malaria amp other diseases 253 031
7 - Ensure environmental sustainability 94331 1167
TOTAL 80866 10000
Summary of ODA for completed amp ongoing projects by MDG category from 2001-2005 in million US$
Source NEDA-PMS
ODA for MDGs
INVESTMENTS SUPPORTIVE OF THE MDGs 2005-2010
MDGs COST
(in PhP Billion)
1 - Eradicate extreme poverty amp hunger 129422 - Achieve universal primary education 5673 - Promote gender equality -4 - Reduce child mortality
6995 - Improve maternal health
6 - Combat HIVAIDS malaria amp other diseases
7 - Ensure environmental sustainability 19888 ndash Global partnership for development 1251
TOTAL 17447
Source NEDA-PIS
INTENSIFYING MULTISECTORAL PARTNERSHIP AND COLLABORATION
Government (executive legislature judicial)
Local Government
CSOsAcademe
Local Government
PrivateBusiness
Donor Community
Environmental Situationand Challenges
Goal 7 Ensure Environmental Sustainability
bull Forests resources and watersheds
bull Biodiversity resources
bull Coastal and marine resources
bull Air quality
bull Water resources
bull Waste and toxic chemicals
Area Proportion to Total
(Hectares) ()
7168400 100
2560872 36
Broadleaved 2448864
Mixed 24618
Coniferous 87390
4030588 56
Broadleaved 3847284
Mixed 69861
Coniferous 113443
247362 3
329578 5Source Forest Management Bureau (FMB)
Total Forest
Mangrove
Plantation
Forest Cover by Forest Type 2003
Closed Forest
Open Forest
Category
Area Reforested 1990-2003 (in hectares)Year Total
Government
Percent Non-Government
Percent
Sector
2003 15087 13195 875 1892 125
2002 25620 20682 807 4938 193
2001 31440 26524 844 4916 156
2000 27632 21740 787 5892 213
1999 42165 31183 74 10982 26
1998 42368 33219 784 9149 216
1997 66236 49301 744 16935 256
1996 46096 18869 409 27227 591
1995 65233 21841 335 43392 665
1994 49551 18032 364 31519 636
1993 19211 6347 33 12864 67
1992 40593 24304 599 16289 401
1991 93039 73602 791 19437 209
1990 191663 153949 803 37714 197
Annual Average
53995
Source DENR Annual Report
Biodiversity Resources
Philippineshellip one of the megadiverse countries in the
world higher regard for the endemism of local
species
buthellip most severely threatened of the
megadiverse countries
Coastal and Marine Resources rich sources of fish and aquatic products habitat for countless underwater wildlife natural areas for recreationtourism Water resourcesbull disparities in water supply coverage across regionsbull depletion of ground water especially in Metro
Manila and Metro Cebubull pollution of water sources
Air Qualitybull pollution remains a problem in Metro Manila and
major urban centersbull on the level of suspended particulates (TSP) air
quality is not within standards
Waste and Toxic Chemicalsbull solid waste generation in Metro Manila is estimated at
5345 tons per daybull urbanization inevitably increased the use of chemicalsbull no integrated treatment facility for hazardous waste
Priority Policies and Programs
bull Adoption of Sustainable Forest Management
bull Revised Forestry Code of the Philippines and the Watersheds Code
bull Various biodiversity acts
bull Fisheries Code and AFMA
bull Clean Air Act
Challenges and Priorities for Action
bull Sustainable and more productive utilization of natural resources
bull Focus and strengthen the protection of vulnerable and ecologically fragile areas
bull Create healthier environment for the populationbull Mitigate the occurrence of natural disasters bull Ensure environmental accountability for all
industries
CROSS-CUTTING CHALLENGEShellip
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005
Government Expenditure Program by Sector FY 2000-2005
Social Services Debt Service Economic Services General Public Services Defense
CROSSCUTTING CHALLENGES AND PRIORITIES FOR ACTION
Source DBM Budget of Expenditure and Sources of Financing
FINANCING THE MDGs
SectorYear 2001 2002 2003 2004
Economic Services 15982070 45484830 52853500 58700890
(15) (32) (33) (34)Social Services 28979110 26352690 34001700 36135990
(27) (19) (21) (21)General Public Services 63375820 69580140 73954470 78545740
(58) (49) (46) (45)Total Public Expenditures 108337000 141417660 160809670 173382620
FINANCING THE MDGs
Distribution of Public Expenditures by Local Government UnitsBy Sector 2001-2004 (in thousand pesos)
Source DBM Budget of Expenditure and Sources of Financing
CROSSCUTTING CHALLENGES AND PRIORITIES FOR ACTION
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
2001 2002 2003 2004
ODA Commitments by SectorFY 2001-2004 (US$ million)
Agriculture agrarianreform and naturalresources
Governance andinstitutionsdevelopment
Infrastructuredevelopment
Social reform anddevelopment
Industry and services
Source NEDA-PIS
CROSSCUTTING CHALLENGES AND PRIORITIES FOR ACTION
FINANCING THE MDGs
CROSS-CUTTING CHALLENGES AND
PRIORITIES FOR ACTIONbull Reduce disparities across regions
bull Increase resource allocation for MDG-related programs and projects
bull Enforce fullstricter implementation of laws amp ensure passage of MDG-supportive bills
bull Strengthen monitoring and implementation
bull Scale-up campaign for localization
bull Develop an advocacy plan
bull Intensify multisectoral partnership amp collaboration
Facilitating Factors bull Strong global support for MDGs by the United
Nations ASEAN and other multilateral organizations
bull Expanding national support among policymakers for MDGs (eg creation of the House Committee on MDGs issuance of EO on the MDGs)
bull Prioritization of MDGs in resource allocation (eg focusing of MTPIP investments on MDGs)
bull Increasing awareness and participation of private sector LGUs in MDG-related programs
Hindering Factors
bull Resource constraints (ie MDG financing gap of about $15 billion yearly)
bull Lack of support by creditors for the Debt for MDG ProjectsDebt for Equity in MDG Projects initiative
bull Low budgetary priority for MDGs accorded by some LGUs and
bull Lack of disaggregated data to monitor MDGs at local levels
Parallel Initiatives
Participation in the High-Level Plenary Meeting on MDGs
Formulation of the Plan of Action for Poverty Reduction (2006-2010)Enhance the current Poverty Reduction
Strategy and Program Framework
Advocacy for the Philippine proposal on Debt for Equity in MDG Projects
Implications on the Philippine Economy
MDG attainment would requirebull Enhanced revenue generationbull LGU private sector and civil society supportbull Expansion of microfinance services for the poorbull Pursuit of projects with high economic impactbull Right-sizing the bureaucracybull Privatization andbull Tapping OFW remittances
Geographical and geophysical factors
1048707 Considering the huge size of the basic education system (over40000 public schools in 7107 islands) the applications of moderninformation and communication technology may offer the onlyfeasible medium for delivering high-quality instruction to millions oflearners in a large diverse and geographically dispersed population1048707 DepEd must seriously consider adopting a flexible school calendar ndasheg first three months of the school calendar (June to August) are the rainy months with frequent flooding in Metro Manila supervision of schools is very difficult and dangerous during the rainy and typhoon season
1048707 There is need to adopt differentiated designs for school facilities to withstand natural calamities such as typhoons and earthquakes
bull C Reaching the Un-reached and Underserved Groups of Learners
bull 144 Providing children in difficultdifferent circumstances access to quality and
bull relevant basic education is still a big challenge that the country should immediately
bull address To witbull bull Children Engaged in Labor DepEd needs to intensify
the implementation of itsbull distance learning program both for elementary and
secondary levels so thatbull schoolchildren who really need to work to earn a living
could still continuebull schooling even without regularly attending classes
bull bull Street Children
bull DepEd needs to establish a strong partnership with other
bull government agencies and other partners (NGOs privatebusiness sectorLGUs)
bull in providing basic education and other social and livelihood services to street children and their families (the main objective of the latter services is to sustain childrenrsquos schooling)
bull bull Children with Special Needs (Gifted and Differently-abled)
bull With the limited coverage of existing government educational facilities DepEd together with other agencies and partners need to work on the expansion of basic education services to reach more persons with disability DepEd should specifically work on
bull the strengthening and expansion of its SPED classes in the existing public
bull elementary and secondary schools and the strengthening and enrichment of its regular classes to mainstream the people with disabilities
(1990 or Level 2015 Attaining theMDG year closest (20022004) 1 Targets
to 1990) 2
Eradicate extreme poverty and hunger underweight among 0-5 yo children 345 276 1725 MediumAchieve universal primary education
Elementary participation rate 3 851 a 9005 100 MediumImprove maternal healthMaternal mortality rate 209 172 c 522 Medium
Increase access to RH servicesContraceptive prevalence rate 40 b 489 70 Medium
Achieve universal primary education
Elementary cohort survival rate 684 a 698 833 Low
Muslim Children With the big percentage (93) of Muslim school-age population in the public school system the effective implementation of the national curriculum for Muslim education in the public school system is verycritical The overall goal of the curriculum is to develop the core competencies of Muslim children in order for them to function effectively in society within thecontext of their environment and culture and that of the wider community In the long run it will hopefully effectively address the economic social political problems in Muslim-dominated areas and the entire country in general
bull Children in Conflict-Affected Areas Convergence of support for the protection ofchildren especially those who are not educated from being vulnerable targets fortraining and indoctrination as fighters There is also a need to execute acovenant among and between concerned parties to protect schools as ldquopeacezonesrdquo
In summary the country was not able to attain its 2005 targets in almost all key outcome indicators in Early Childhood Education Formal Basic Education and Alternative Learning System
Most of the regions have performance classified asldquofalling further behindrdquo or with performance lower than the national level in 2002 and continued to decline in 2005 While substantial investments were poured into the establishment of basic education facilities these were not enough to ensure that all3-5 year olds are in Early Childhood Education learning centers and all school-aged children were in school and able to continue and eventually complete basic education with satisfactory achievement level The basic education system should 53 be responsive to the differentiated needs of learners where a ldquoone-size fit allrdquo or conventional interventions (such as construction of classrooms provision of textbooks etc) are not enough or will no longer work
MDG attainment would requireEnhanced revenue generationLGU private sector and civil society supportPursuit of projects with high economic impactandTapping OFW remittances
Working towards achieving one Goal will make us closer to achievement of the rest amp would reduce costs of achieving othersrdquo Eveline Herfkens
SDC Res No 1 2003 ldquoExpanding
functions and composition of
MC-IHDCrdquo
DILG MC 2004-152 ldquoGuide to LGUs in the
Localization of the MDGsrdquo
MTPDP 2004-2010 hews
closely to the MDGs
Strong commitment
of the business
sector and civil society
Investment identification per goal and target in MTPIP
2005-2010
Strong support of
donor community
for the MDGs
Legislative support of Congress
Enabling Environment for the MDGs
Poverty Situation
FIGURE 1 Poverty Incidence of Population by Region 2003
Legend
Below national average (73 - 304)Above national average(305 - 542)
Source
NSO Family Income and Expenditures Survey 2003
ARMM 531
Cordillera Region 312
Metro Manila 73
Ilocos Region 302
Cagayan Valley 245
Central Luzon 177
CALABARZON 188
MIMAROPA 479
Bicol Region 484
Western Visayas 391
Central Visayas 284
Eastern Visayas 433
Western Mindanao 494
Northern Mindanao 443
Southern Mindanao 344
Central Mindanao 384
CARAGA 542
Annual Per Capita Poverty Threshold Poverty Incidence of Families and Population by Region 2000 and 2003
2000 Revised 2003 2000 Revised 2003 2000 Revised 2003Philippines 11 451 12 267 275 247 330 304NCR 15 693 16 796 57 50 76 73CAR 13 066 13 976 307 248 376 312Region I 12 685 13 276 294 244 351 302Region II 11 128 11 409 252 193 304 245Region III 13 760 14 342 173 137 214 177Region IV-A 13 657 14 616 152 149 191 188Region IV-B 11 995 12 406 363 397 452 479Region V 11 372 12 354 453 405 526 484Region VI 11 313 12 275 366 313 444 391Region VII 9 656 9 779 315 237 362 284Region VIII 9 518 10 802 375 355 451 433Region IX 9 116 10 414 385 441 448 494Region X 10 503 11 609 379 379 438 443Region XI 10 264 11 276 277 281 331 344Region XII 10 466 11 303 407 320 468 384Caraga 10 896 12 000 437 473 509 542ARMM 12 192 12 739 537 457 598 531
Poverty Incidenceof Population ()Region
Annual Per Capita PovertyThreshold (in Pesos)
Poverty Incidenceof Families ()
FIGURE 2 Subsistence Incidence of Population by Region 2003
Legend
Below national average Above national average
Source
NSO_Family and Income Expenditure Study 2003
ARMM 241
Cordillera Region 134
Metro Manila 06
Ilocos Region 112
Cagayan Valley 76
Central Luzon 42
CALABARZON 49
MIMAROPA 229
Bicol Region 266
Western Visayas 177
Central Visayas 146
Eastern Visayas 21
Western Mindanao 328
Northern Mindanao 254
Southern Mindanao 176
Central Mindanao 184
CARAGA 31
Annual Per Capita Food Threshold Subsistence Incidence of Families and Population by Region 2000 and 2003
2000 Revised 2003 2000 Revised 2003 2000 Revised 2003Philippines 7 707 8 134 123 104 158 138NCR 9 570 9 974 07 04 10 06CAR 8 744 9 117 137 98 179 134Region I 8 552 8 903 114 81 152 112Region II 7 560 8 026 93 56 118 76Region III 8 764 9 338 42 29 55 42Region IV-A 8 782 9 189 51 37 65 49Region IV-B 8 078 8 339 174 177 241 229Region V 8 047 8 372 233 203 293 266Region VI 7 983 8 386 174 129 231 177Region VII 6 759 7 016 169 112 207 146Region VIII 7 080 7 696 191 155 248 210Region IX 6 574 7 245 210 279 258 328Region X 7 296 7 999 192 197 238 254Region XI 7 087 7 751 128 135 167 176Region XII 7 235 7 804 179 140 226 184Caraga 7 667 8 353 244 245 307 310ARMM 8 313 8 737 239 186 285 241
RegionAnnual Per Capita Food Subsistence Incidence Subsistence Incidence
Threshold (in Pesos) of Families () of Population ()
FIGURE 3 Gini Concentration Ratios by Region 2003
Legend
Below National AverageAbove National Average
ARMM 03464
Cordillera Region 04294
Metro Manila 0413
Ilocos Region 03968
Cagayan Valley 04411
Central Luzon 03486
CALABARZON 04058
MIMAROPA 04354
Bicol Region 04648
Western Visayas 04392
Central Visayas 04711
Eastern Visayas 04577
Western Mindanao 05197
Northern Mindanao 04768
Southern Mindanao 04583
Central Mindanao 04567
CARAGA 04294
Gini Coefficient Among Families by Region 2000 and 2003
Region2000 2003 Change
Philippines 04822 04660 -16NCR 04451 04130 -32CAR 04439 04294 -15Region I 04071 03968 -10Region II 04227 04411 18Region III 03591 03486 -11Region IV-A 04086 04058 -03Region IV-B 04076 04354 28Region V 04455 04648 19Region VI 04594 04392 -20Region VII 04691 04711 02Region VIII 04807 04577 -23Region IX 04732 05197 47Region X 04794 04768 -03Region XI 04318 04567 25Region XII 04631 04583 -05Caraga 04118 04294 18ARMM 03171 03464 29
GINI
FIGURE 4 Percentage of Households with Less than 100 Energy Adequacy
FIGURE 5 Percentage of Underweight Children 0-5 Year Olds
Meeting Goal 1 Eradicate Extreme Poverty and Hunger
Priority Policies and Programs
bull Kapit-Bisig Laban sa Kahirapan (KALAHI)
bull Enrolment of 7 million beneficiaries under the National Health Insurance Program (NHIP)
bull Wholesale portfolio of the Peoplersquos Credit and Finance Corporation (PCFC)
bull Implementation of asset reform programs
bull Delivery of human development services
MDGs Amount
(in US$ million)
Share to Total MDG-
Related ODA
1 - Eradicate extreme poverty amp hunger 62594 7740
2 - Achieve universal primary education 5579 690
3 - Promote gender equality 38 005
4 - Reduce child mortality 1399 173
5 - Improve maternal health 1570 194
6 - Combat HIVAIDS malaria amp other diseases 253 031
7 - Ensure environmental sustainability 94331 1167
TOTAL 80866 10000
Summary of ODA for completed amp ongoing projects by MDG category from 2001-2005 in million US$
Source NEDA-PMS
ODA for MDGs
INVESTMENTS SUPPORTIVE OF THE MDGs 2005-2010
MDGs COST
(in PhP Billion)
1 - Eradicate extreme poverty amp hunger 129422 - Achieve universal primary education 5673 - Promote gender equality -4 - Reduce child mortality
6995 - Improve maternal health
6 - Combat HIVAIDS malaria amp other diseases
7 - Ensure environmental sustainability 19888 ndash Global partnership for development 1251
TOTAL 17447
Source NEDA-PIS
INTENSIFYING MULTISECTORAL PARTNERSHIP AND COLLABORATION
Government (executive legislature judicial)
Local Government
CSOsAcademe
Local Government
PrivateBusiness
Donor Community
Environmental Situationand Challenges
Goal 7 Ensure Environmental Sustainability
bull Forests resources and watersheds
bull Biodiversity resources
bull Coastal and marine resources
bull Air quality
bull Water resources
bull Waste and toxic chemicals
Area Proportion to Total
(Hectares) ()
7168400 100
2560872 36
Broadleaved 2448864
Mixed 24618
Coniferous 87390
4030588 56
Broadleaved 3847284
Mixed 69861
Coniferous 113443
247362 3
329578 5Source Forest Management Bureau (FMB)
Total Forest
Mangrove
Plantation
Forest Cover by Forest Type 2003
Closed Forest
Open Forest
Category
Area Reforested 1990-2003 (in hectares)Year Total
Government
Percent Non-Government
Percent
Sector
2003 15087 13195 875 1892 125
2002 25620 20682 807 4938 193
2001 31440 26524 844 4916 156
2000 27632 21740 787 5892 213
1999 42165 31183 74 10982 26
1998 42368 33219 784 9149 216
1997 66236 49301 744 16935 256
1996 46096 18869 409 27227 591
1995 65233 21841 335 43392 665
1994 49551 18032 364 31519 636
1993 19211 6347 33 12864 67
1992 40593 24304 599 16289 401
1991 93039 73602 791 19437 209
1990 191663 153949 803 37714 197
Annual Average
53995
Source DENR Annual Report
Biodiversity Resources
Philippineshellip one of the megadiverse countries in the
world higher regard for the endemism of local
species
buthellip most severely threatened of the
megadiverse countries
Coastal and Marine Resources rich sources of fish and aquatic products habitat for countless underwater wildlife natural areas for recreationtourism Water resourcesbull disparities in water supply coverage across regionsbull depletion of ground water especially in Metro
Manila and Metro Cebubull pollution of water sources
Air Qualitybull pollution remains a problem in Metro Manila and
major urban centersbull on the level of suspended particulates (TSP) air
quality is not within standards
Waste and Toxic Chemicalsbull solid waste generation in Metro Manila is estimated at
5345 tons per daybull urbanization inevitably increased the use of chemicalsbull no integrated treatment facility for hazardous waste
Priority Policies and Programs
bull Adoption of Sustainable Forest Management
bull Revised Forestry Code of the Philippines and the Watersheds Code
bull Various biodiversity acts
bull Fisheries Code and AFMA
bull Clean Air Act
Challenges and Priorities for Action
bull Sustainable and more productive utilization of natural resources
bull Focus and strengthen the protection of vulnerable and ecologically fragile areas
bull Create healthier environment for the populationbull Mitigate the occurrence of natural disasters bull Ensure environmental accountability for all
industries
CROSS-CUTTING CHALLENGEShellip
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005
Government Expenditure Program by Sector FY 2000-2005
Social Services Debt Service Economic Services General Public Services Defense
CROSSCUTTING CHALLENGES AND PRIORITIES FOR ACTION
Source DBM Budget of Expenditure and Sources of Financing
FINANCING THE MDGs
SectorYear 2001 2002 2003 2004
Economic Services 15982070 45484830 52853500 58700890
(15) (32) (33) (34)Social Services 28979110 26352690 34001700 36135990
(27) (19) (21) (21)General Public Services 63375820 69580140 73954470 78545740
(58) (49) (46) (45)Total Public Expenditures 108337000 141417660 160809670 173382620
FINANCING THE MDGs
Distribution of Public Expenditures by Local Government UnitsBy Sector 2001-2004 (in thousand pesos)
Source DBM Budget of Expenditure and Sources of Financing
CROSSCUTTING CHALLENGES AND PRIORITIES FOR ACTION
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
2001 2002 2003 2004
ODA Commitments by SectorFY 2001-2004 (US$ million)
Agriculture agrarianreform and naturalresources
Governance andinstitutionsdevelopment
Infrastructuredevelopment
Social reform anddevelopment
Industry and services
Source NEDA-PIS
CROSSCUTTING CHALLENGES AND PRIORITIES FOR ACTION
FINANCING THE MDGs
CROSS-CUTTING CHALLENGES AND
PRIORITIES FOR ACTIONbull Reduce disparities across regions
bull Increase resource allocation for MDG-related programs and projects
bull Enforce fullstricter implementation of laws amp ensure passage of MDG-supportive bills
bull Strengthen monitoring and implementation
bull Scale-up campaign for localization
bull Develop an advocacy plan
bull Intensify multisectoral partnership amp collaboration
Facilitating Factors bull Strong global support for MDGs by the United
Nations ASEAN and other multilateral organizations
bull Expanding national support among policymakers for MDGs (eg creation of the House Committee on MDGs issuance of EO on the MDGs)
bull Prioritization of MDGs in resource allocation (eg focusing of MTPIP investments on MDGs)
bull Increasing awareness and participation of private sector LGUs in MDG-related programs
Hindering Factors
bull Resource constraints (ie MDG financing gap of about $15 billion yearly)
bull Lack of support by creditors for the Debt for MDG ProjectsDebt for Equity in MDG Projects initiative
bull Low budgetary priority for MDGs accorded by some LGUs and
bull Lack of disaggregated data to monitor MDGs at local levels
Parallel Initiatives
Participation in the High-Level Plenary Meeting on MDGs
Formulation of the Plan of Action for Poverty Reduction (2006-2010)Enhance the current Poverty Reduction
Strategy and Program Framework
Advocacy for the Philippine proposal on Debt for Equity in MDG Projects
Implications on the Philippine Economy
MDG attainment would requirebull Enhanced revenue generationbull LGU private sector and civil society supportbull Expansion of microfinance services for the poorbull Pursuit of projects with high economic impactbull Right-sizing the bureaucracybull Privatization andbull Tapping OFW remittances
bull C Reaching the Un-reached and Underserved Groups of Learners
bull 144 Providing children in difficultdifferent circumstances access to quality and
bull relevant basic education is still a big challenge that the country should immediately
bull address To witbull bull Children Engaged in Labor DepEd needs to intensify
the implementation of itsbull distance learning program both for elementary and
secondary levels so thatbull schoolchildren who really need to work to earn a living
could still continuebull schooling even without regularly attending classes
bull bull Street Children
bull DepEd needs to establish a strong partnership with other
bull government agencies and other partners (NGOs privatebusiness sectorLGUs)
bull in providing basic education and other social and livelihood services to street children and their families (the main objective of the latter services is to sustain childrenrsquos schooling)
bull bull Children with Special Needs (Gifted and Differently-abled)
bull With the limited coverage of existing government educational facilities DepEd together with other agencies and partners need to work on the expansion of basic education services to reach more persons with disability DepEd should specifically work on
bull the strengthening and expansion of its SPED classes in the existing public
bull elementary and secondary schools and the strengthening and enrichment of its regular classes to mainstream the people with disabilities
(1990 or Level 2015 Attaining theMDG year closest (20022004) 1 Targets
to 1990) 2
Eradicate extreme poverty and hunger underweight among 0-5 yo children 345 276 1725 MediumAchieve universal primary education
Elementary participation rate 3 851 a 9005 100 MediumImprove maternal healthMaternal mortality rate 209 172 c 522 Medium
Increase access to RH servicesContraceptive prevalence rate 40 b 489 70 Medium
Achieve universal primary education
Elementary cohort survival rate 684 a 698 833 Low
Muslim Children With the big percentage (93) of Muslim school-age population in the public school system the effective implementation of the national curriculum for Muslim education in the public school system is verycritical The overall goal of the curriculum is to develop the core competencies of Muslim children in order for them to function effectively in society within thecontext of their environment and culture and that of the wider community In the long run it will hopefully effectively address the economic social political problems in Muslim-dominated areas and the entire country in general
bull Children in Conflict-Affected Areas Convergence of support for the protection ofchildren especially those who are not educated from being vulnerable targets fortraining and indoctrination as fighters There is also a need to execute acovenant among and between concerned parties to protect schools as ldquopeacezonesrdquo
In summary the country was not able to attain its 2005 targets in almost all key outcome indicators in Early Childhood Education Formal Basic Education and Alternative Learning System
Most of the regions have performance classified asldquofalling further behindrdquo or with performance lower than the national level in 2002 and continued to decline in 2005 While substantial investments were poured into the establishment of basic education facilities these were not enough to ensure that all3-5 year olds are in Early Childhood Education learning centers and all school-aged children were in school and able to continue and eventually complete basic education with satisfactory achievement level The basic education system should 53 be responsive to the differentiated needs of learners where a ldquoone-size fit allrdquo or conventional interventions (such as construction of classrooms provision of textbooks etc) are not enough or will no longer work
MDG attainment would requireEnhanced revenue generationLGU private sector and civil society supportPursuit of projects with high economic impactandTapping OFW remittances
Working towards achieving one Goal will make us closer to achievement of the rest amp would reduce costs of achieving othersrdquo Eveline Herfkens
SDC Res No 1 2003 ldquoExpanding
functions and composition of
MC-IHDCrdquo
DILG MC 2004-152 ldquoGuide to LGUs in the
Localization of the MDGsrdquo
MTPDP 2004-2010 hews
closely to the MDGs
Strong commitment
of the business
sector and civil society
Investment identification per goal and target in MTPIP
2005-2010
Strong support of
donor community
for the MDGs
Legislative support of Congress
Enabling Environment for the MDGs
Poverty Situation
FIGURE 1 Poverty Incidence of Population by Region 2003
Legend
Below national average (73 - 304)Above national average(305 - 542)
Source
NSO Family Income and Expenditures Survey 2003
ARMM 531
Cordillera Region 312
Metro Manila 73
Ilocos Region 302
Cagayan Valley 245
Central Luzon 177
CALABARZON 188
MIMAROPA 479
Bicol Region 484
Western Visayas 391
Central Visayas 284
Eastern Visayas 433
Western Mindanao 494
Northern Mindanao 443
Southern Mindanao 344
Central Mindanao 384
CARAGA 542
Annual Per Capita Poverty Threshold Poverty Incidence of Families and Population by Region 2000 and 2003
2000 Revised 2003 2000 Revised 2003 2000 Revised 2003Philippines 11 451 12 267 275 247 330 304NCR 15 693 16 796 57 50 76 73CAR 13 066 13 976 307 248 376 312Region I 12 685 13 276 294 244 351 302Region II 11 128 11 409 252 193 304 245Region III 13 760 14 342 173 137 214 177Region IV-A 13 657 14 616 152 149 191 188Region IV-B 11 995 12 406 363 397 452 479Region V 11 372 12 354 453 405 526 484Region VI 11 313 12 275 366 313 444 391Region VII 9 656 9 779 315 237 362 284Region VIII 9 518 10 802 375 355 451 433Region IX 9 116 10 414 385 441 448 494Region X 10 503 11 609 379 379 438 443Region XI 10 264 11 276 277 281 331 344Region XII 10 466 11 303 407 320 468 384Caraga 10 896 12 000 437 473 509 542ARMM 12 192 12 739 537 457 598 531
Poverty Incidenceof Population ()Region
Annual Per Capita PovertyThreshold (in Pesos)
Poverty Incidenceof Families ()
FIGURE 2 Subsistence Incidence of Population by Region 2003
Legend
Below national average Above national average
Source
NSO_Family and Income Expenditure Study 2003
ARMM 241
Cordillera Region 134
Metro Manila 06
Ilocos Region 112
Cagayan Valley 76
Central Luzon 42
CALABARZON 49
MIMAROPA 229
Bicol Region 266
Western Visayas 177
Central Visayas 146
Eastern Visayas 21
Western Mindanao 328
Northern Mindanao 254
Southern Mindanao 176
Central Mindanao 184
CARAGA 31
Annual Per Capita Food Threshold Subsistence Incidence of Families and Population by Region 2000 and 2003
2000 Revised 2003 2000 Revised 2003 2000 Revised 2003Philippines 7 707 8 134 123 104 158 138NCR 9 570 9 974 07 04 10 06CAR 8 744 9 117 137 98 179 134Region I 8 552 8 903 114 81 152 112Region II 7 560 8 026 93 56 118 76Region III 8 764 9 338 42 29 55 42Region IV-A 8 782 9 189 51 37 65 49Region IV-B 8 078 8 339 174 177 241 229Region V 8 047 8 372 233 203 293 266Region VI 7 983 8 386 174 129 231 177Region VII 6 759 7 016 169 112 207 146Region VIII 7 080 7 696 191 155 248 210Region IX 6 574 7 245 210 279 258 328Region X 7 296 7 999 192 197 238 254Region XI 7 087 7 751 128 135 167 176Region XII 7 235 7 804 179 140 226 184Caraga 7 667 8 353 244 245 307 310ARMM 8 313 8 737 239 186 285 241
RegionAnnual Per Capita Food Subsistence Incidence Subsistence Incidence
Threshold (in Pesos) of Families () of Population ()
FIGURE 3 Gini Concentration Ratios by Region 2003
Legend
Below National AverageAbove National Average
ARMM 03464
Cordillera Region 04294
Metro Manila 0413
Ilocos Region 03968
Cagayan Valley 04411
Central Luzon 03486
CALABARZON 04058
MIMAROPA 04354
Bicol Region 04648
Western Visayas 04392
Central Visayas 04711
Eastern Visayas 04577
Western Mindanao 05197
Northern Mindanao 04768
Southern Mindanao 04583
Central Mindanao 04567
CARAGA 04294
Gini Coefficient Among Families by Region 2000 and 2003
Region2000 2003 Change
Philippines 04822 04660 -16NCR 04451 04130 -32CAR 04439 04294 -15Region I 04071 03968 -10Region II 04227 04411 18Region III 03591 03486 -11Region IV-A 04086 04058 -03Region IV-B 04076 04354 28Region V 04455 04648 19Region VI 04594 04392 -20Region VII 04691 04711 02Region VIII 04807 04577 -23Region IX 04732 05197 47Region X 04794 04768 -03Region XI 04318 04567 25Region XII 04631 04583 -05Caraga 04118 04294 18ARMM 03171 03464 29
GINI
FIGURE 4 Percentage of Households with Less than 100 Energy Adequacy
FIGURE 5 Percentage of Underweight Children 0-5 Year Olds
Meeting Goal 1 Eradicate Extreme Poverty and Hunger
Priority Policies and Programs
bull Kapit-Bisig Laban sa Kahirapan (KALAHI)
bull Enrolment of 7 million beneficiaries under the National Health Insurance Program (NHIP)
bull Wholesale portfolio of the Peoplersquos Credit and Finance Corporation (PCFC)
bull Implementation of asset reform programs
bull Delivery of human development services
MDGs Amount
(in US$ million)
Share to Total MDG-
Related ODA
1 - Eradicate extreme poverty amp hunger 62594 7740
2 - Achieve universal primary education 5579 690
3 - Promote gender equality 38 005
4 - Reduce child mortality 1399 173
5 - Improve maternal health 1570 194
6 - Combat HIVAIDS malaria amp other diseases 253 031
7 - Ensure environmental sustainability 94331 1167
TOTAL 80866 10000
Summary of ODA for completed amp ongoing projects by MDG category from 2001-2005 in million US$
Source NEDA-PMS
ODA for MDGs
INVESTMENTS SUPPORTIVE OF THE MDGs 2005-2010
MDGs COST
(in PhP Billion)
1 - Eradicate extreme poverty amp hunger 129422 - Achieve universal primary education 5673 - Promote gender equality -4 - Reduce child mortality
6995 - Improve maternal health
6 - Combat HIVAIDS malaria amp other diseases
7 - Ensure environmental sustainability 19888 ndash Global partnership for development 1251
TOTAL 17447
Source NEDA-PIS
INTENSIFYING MULTISECTORAL PARTNERSHIP AND COLLABORATION
Government (executive legislature judicial)
Local Government
CSOsAcademe
Local Government
PrivateBusiness
Donor Community
Environmental Situationand Challenges
Goal 7 Ensure Environmental Sustainability
bull Forests resources and watersheds
bull Biodiversity resources
bull Coastal and marine resources
bull Air quality
bull Water resources
bull Waste and toxic chemicals
Area Proportion to Total
(Hectares) ()
7168400 100
2560872 36
Broadleaved 2448864
Mixed 24618
Coniferous 87390
4030588 56
Broadleaved 3847284
Mixed 69861
Coniferous 113443
247362 3
329578 5Source Forest Management Bureau (FMB)
Total Forest
Mangrove
Plantation
Forest Cover by Forest Type 2003
Closed Forest
Open Forest
Category
Area Reforested 1990-2003 (in hectares)Year Total
Government
Percent Non-Government
Percent
Sector
2003 15087 13195 875 1892 125
2002 25620 20682 807 4938 193
2001 31440 26524 844 4916 156
2000 27632 21740 787 5892 213
1999 42165 31183 74 10982 26
1998 42368 33219 784 9149 216
1997 66236 49301 744 16935 256
1996 46096 18869 409 27227 591
1995 65233 21841 335 43392 665
1994 49551 18032 364 31519 636
1993 19211 6347 33 12864 67
1992 40593 24304 599 16289 401
1991 93039 73602 791 19437 209
1990 191663 153949 803 37714 197
Annual Average
53995
Source DENR Annual Report
Biodiversity Resources
Philippineshellip one of the megadiverse countries in the
world higher regard for the endemism of local
species
buthellip most severely threatened of the
megadiverse countries
Coastal and Marine Resources rich sources of fish and aquatic products habitat for countless underwater wildlife natural areas for recreationtourism Water resourcesbull disparities in water supply coverage across regionsbull depletion of ground water especially in Metro
Manila and Metro Cebubull pollution of water sources
Air Qualitybull pollution remains a problem in Metro Manila and
major urban centersbull on the level of suspended particulates (TSP) air
quality is not within standards
Waste and Toxic Chemicalsbull solid waste generation in Metro Manila is estimated at
5345 tons per daybull urbanization inevitably increased the use of chemicalsbull no integrated treatment facility for hazardous waste
Priority Policies and Programs
bull Adoption of Sustainable Forest Management
bull Revised Forestry Code of the Philippines and the Watersheds Code
bull Various biodiversity acts
bull Fisheries Code and AFMA
bull Clean Air Act
Challenges and Priorities for Action
bull Sustainable and more productive utilization of natural resources
bull Focus and strengthen the protection of vulnerable and ecologically fragile areas
bull Create healthier environment for the populationbull Mitigate the occurrence of natural disasters bull Ensure environmental accountability for all
industries
CROSS-CUTTING CHALLENGEShellip
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005
Government Expenditure Program by Sector FY 2000-2005
Social Services Debt Service Economic Services General Public Services Defense
CROSSCUTTING CHALLENGES AND PRIORITIES FOR ACTION
Source DBM Budget of Expenditure and Sources of Financing
FINANCING THE MDGs
SectorYear 2001 2002 2003 2004
Economic Services 15982070 45484830 52853500 58700890
(15) (32) (33) (34)Social Services 28979110 26352690 34001700 36135990
(27) (19) (21) (21)General Public Services 63375820 69580140 73954470 78545740
(58) (49) (46) (45)Total Public Expenditures 108337000 141417660 160809670 173382620
FINANCING THE MDGs
Distribution of Public Expenditures by Local Government UnitsBy Sector 2001-2004 (in thousand pesos)
Source DBM Budget of Expenditure and Sources of Financing
CROSSCUTTING CHALLENGES AND PRIORITIES FOR ACTION
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
2001 2002 2003 2004
ODA Commitments by SectorFY 2001-2004 (US$ million)
Agriculture agrarianreform and naturalresources
Governance andinstitutionsdevelopment
Infrastructuredevelopment
Social reform anddevelopment
Industry and services
Source NEDA-PIS
CROSSCUTTING CHALLENGES AND PRIORITIES FOR ACTION
FINANCING THE MDGs
CROSS-CUTTING CHALLENGES AND
PRIORITIES FOR ACTIONbull Reduce disparities across regions
bull Increase resource allocation for MDG-related programs and projects
bull Enforce fullstricter implementation of laws amp ensure passage of MDG-supportive bills
bull Strengthen monitoring and implementation
bull Scale-up campaign for localization
bull Develop an advocacy plan
bull Intensify multisectoral partnership amp collaboration
Facilitating Factors bull Strong global support for MDGs by the United
Nations ASEAN and other multilateral organizations
bull Expanding national support among policymakers for MDGs (eg creation of the House Committee on MDGs issuance of EO on the MDGs)
bull Prioritization of MDGs in resource allocation (eg focusing of MTPIP investments on MDGs)
bull Increasing awareness and participation of private sector LGUs in MDG-related programs
Hindering Factors
bull Resource constraints (ie MDG financing gap of about $15 billion yearly)
bull Lack of support by creditors for the Debt for MDG ProjectsDebt for Equity in MDG Projects initiative
bull Low budgetary priority for MDGs accorded by some LGUs and
bull Lack of disaggregated data to monitor MDGs at local levels
Parallel Initiatives
Participation in the High-Level Plenary Meeting on MDGs
Formulation of the Plan of Action for Poverty Reduction (2006-2010)Enhance the current Poverty Reduction
Strategy and Program Framework
Advocacy for the Philippine proposal on Debt for Equity in MDG Projects
Implications on the Philippine Economy
MDG attainment would requirebull Enhanced revenue generationbull LGU private sector and civil society supportbull Expansion of microfinance services for the poorbull Pursuit of projects with high economic impactbull Right-sizing the bureaucracybull Privatization andbull Tapping OFW remittances
bull bull Street Children
bull DepEd needs to establish a strong partnership with other
bull government agencies and other partners (NGOs privatebusiness sectorLGUs)
bull in providing basic education and other social and livelihood services to street children and their families (the main objective of the latter services is to sustain childrenrsquos schooling)
bull bull Children with Special Needs (Gifted and Differently-abled)
bull With the limited coverage of existing government educational facilities DepEd together with other agencies and partners need to work on the expansion of basic education services to reach more persons with disability DepEd should specifically work on
bull the strengthening and expansion of its SPED classes in the existing public
bull elementary and secondary schools and the strengthening and enrichment of its regular classes to mainstream the people with disabilities
(1990 or Level 2015 Attaining theMDG year closest (20022004) 1 Targets
to 1990) 2
Eradicate extreme poverty and hunger underweight among 0-5 yo children 345 276 1725 MediumAchieve universal primary education
Elementary participation rate 3 851 a 9005 100 MediumImprove maternal healthMaternal mortality rate 209 172 c 522 Medium
Increase access to RH servicesContraceptive prevalence rate 40 b 489 70 Medium
Achieve universal primary education
Elementary cohort survival rate 684 a 698 833 Low
Muslim Children With the big percentage (93) of Muslim school-age population in the public school system the effective implementation of the national curriculum for Muslim education in the public school system is verycritical The overall goal of the curriculum is to develop the core competencies of Muslim children in order for them to function effectively in society within thecontext of their environment and culture and that of the wider community In the long run it will hopefully effectively address the economic social political problems in Muslim-dominated areas and the entire country in general
bull Children in Conflict-Affected Areas Convergence of support for the protection ofchildren especially those who are not educated from being vulnerable targets fortraining and indoctrination as fighters There is also a need to execute acovenant among and between concerned parties to protect schools as ldquopeacezonesrdquo
In summary the country was not able to attain its 2005 targets in almost all key outcome indicators in Early Childhood Education Formal Basic Education and Alternative Learning System
Most of the regions have performance classified asldquofalling further behindrdquo or with performance lower than the national level in 2002 and continued to decline in 2005 While substantial investments were poured into the establishment of basic education facilities these were not enough to ensure that all3-5 year olds are in Early Childhood Education learning centers and all school-aged children were in school and able to continue and eventually complete basic education with satisfactory achievement level The basic education system should 53 be responsive to the differentiated needs of learners where a ldquoone-size fit allrdquo or conventional interventions (such as construction of classrooms provision of textbooks etc) are not enough or will no longer work
MDG attainment would requireEnhanced revenue generationLGU private sector and civil society supportPursuit of projects with high economic impactandTapping OFW remittances
Working towards achieving one Goal will make us closer to achievement of the rest amp would reduce costs of achieving othersrdquo Eveline Herfkens
SDC Res No 1 2003 ldquoExpanding
functions and composition of
MC-IHDCrdquo
DILG MC 2004-152 ldquoGuide to LGUs in the
Localization of the MDGsrdquo
MTPDP 2004-2010 hews
closely to the MDGs
Strong commitment
of the business
sector and civil society
Investment identification per goal and target in MTPIP
2005-2010
Strong support of
donor community
for the MDGs
Legislative support of Congress
Enabling Environment for the MDGs
Poverty Situation
FIGURE 1 Poverty Incidence of Population by Region 2003
Legend
Below national average (73 - 304)Above national average(305 - 542)
Source
NSO Family Income and Expenditures Survey 2003
ARMM 531
Cordillera Region 312
Metro Manila 73
Ilocos Region 302
Cagayan Valley 245
Central Luzon 177
CALABARZON 188
MIMAROPA 479
Bicol Region 484
Western Visayas 391
Central Visayas 284
Eastern Visayas 433
Western Mindanao 494
Northern Mindanao 443
Southern Mindanao 344
Central Mindanao 384
CARAGA 542
Annual Per Capita Poverty Threshold Poverty Incidence of Families and Population by Region 2000 and 2003
2000 Revised 2003 2000 Revised 2003 2000 Revised 2003Philippines 11 451 12 267 275 247 330 304NCR 15 693 16 796 57 50 76 73CAR 13 066 13 976 307 248 376 312Region I 12 685 13 276 294 244 351 302Region II 11 128 11 409 252 193 304 245Region III 13 760 14 342 173 137 214 177Region IV-A 13 657 14 616 152 149 191 188Region IV-B 11 995 12 406 363 397 452 479Region V 11 372 12 354 453 405 526 484Region VI 11 313 12 275 366 313 444 391Region VII 9 656 9 779 315 237 362 284Region VIII 9 518 10 802 375 355 451 433Region IX 9 116 10 414 385 441 448 494Region X 10 503 11 609 379 379 438 443Region XI 10 264 11 276 277 281 331 344Region XII 10 466 11 303 407 320 468 384Caraga 10 896 12 000 437 473 509 542ARMM 12 192 12 739 537 457 598 531
Poverty Incidenceof Population ()Region
Annual Per Capita PovertyThreshold (in Pesos)
Poverty Incidenceof Families ()
FIGURE 2 Subsistence Incidence of Population by Region 2003
Legend
Below national average Above national average
Source
NSO_Family and Income Expenditure Study 2003
ARMM 241
Cordillera Region 134
Metro Manila 06
Ilocos Region 112
Cagayan Valley 76
Central Luzon 42
CALABARZON 49
MIMAROPA 229
Bicol Region 266
Western Visayas 177
Central Visayas 146
Eastern Visayas 21
Western Mindanao 328
Northern Mindanao 254
Southern Mindanao 176
Central Mindanao 184
CARAGA 31
Annual Per Capita Food Threshold Subsistence Incidence of Families and Population by Region 2000 and 2003
2000 Revised 2003 2000 Revised 2003 2000 Revised 2003Philippines 7 707 8 134 123 104 158 138NCR 9 570 9 974 07 04 10 06CAR 8 744 9 117 137 98 179 134Region I 8 552 8 903 114 81 152 112Region II 7 560 8 026 93 56 118 76Region III 8 764 9 338 42 29 55 42Region IV-A 8 782 9 189 51 37 65 49Region IV-B 8 078 8 339 174 177 241 229Region V 8 047 8 372 233 203 293 266Region VI 7 983 8 386 174 129 231 177Region VII 6 759 7 016 169 112 207 146Region VIII 7 080 7 696 191 155 248 210Region IX 6 574 7 245 210 279 258 328Region X 7 296 7 999 192 197 238 254Region XI 7 087 7 751 128 135 167 176Region XII 7 235 7 804 179 140 226 184Caraga 7 667 8 353 244 245 307 310ARMM 8 313 8 737 239 186 285 241
RegionAnnual Per Capita Food Subsistence Incidence Subsistence Incidence
Threshold (in Pesos) of Families () of Population ()
FIGURE 3 Gini Concentration Ratios by Region 2003
Legend
Below National AverageAbove National Average
ARMM 03464
Cordillera Region 04294
Metro Manila 0413
Ilocos Region 03968
Cagayan Valley 04411
Central Luzon 03486
CALABARZON 04058
MIMAROPA 04354
Bicol Region 04648
Western Visayas 04392
Central Visayas 04711
Eastern Visayas 04577
Western Mindanao 05197
Northern Mindanao 04768
Southern Mindanao 04583
Central Mindanao 04567
CARAGA 04294
Gini Coefficient Among Families by Region 2000 and 2003
Region2000 2003 Change
Philippines 04822 04660 -16NCR 04451 04130 -32CAR 04439 04294 -15Region I 04071 03968 -10Region II 04227 04411 18Region III 03591 03486 -11Region IV-A 04086 04058 -03Region IV-B 04076 04354 28Region V 04455 04648 19Region VI 04594 04392 -20Region VII 04691 04711 02Region VIII 04807 04577 -23Region IX 04732 05197 47Region X 04794 04768 -03Region XI 04318 04567 25Region XII 04631 04583 -05Caraga 04118 04294 18ARMM 03171 03464 29
GINI
FIGURE 4 Percentage of Households with Less than 100 Energy Adequacy
FIGURE 5 Percentage of Underweight Children 0-5 Year Olds
Meeting Goal 1 Eradicate Extreme Poverty and Hunger
Priority Policies and Programs
bull Kapit-Bisig Laban sa Kahirapan (KALAHI)
bull Enrolment of 7 million beneficiaries under the National Health Insurance Program (NHIP)
bull Wholesale portfolio of the Peoplersquos Credit and Finance Corporation (PCFC)
bull Implementation of asset reform programs
bull Delivery of human development services
MDGs Amount
(in US$ million)
Share to Total MDG-
Related ODA
1 - Eradicate extreme poverty amp hunger 62594 7740
2 - Achieve universal primary education 5579 690
3 - Promote gender equality 38 005
4 - Reduce child mortality 1399 173
5 - Improve maternal health 1570 194
6 - Combat HIVAIDS malaria amp other diseases 253 031
7 - Ensure environmental sustainability 94331 1167
TOTAL 80866 10000
Summary of ODA for completed amp ongoing projects by MDG category from 2001-2005 in million US$
Source NEDA-PMS
ODA for MDGs
INVESTMENTS SUPPORTIVE OF THE MDGs 2005-2010
MDGs COST
(in PhP Billion)
1 - Eradicate extreme poverty amp hunger 129422 - Achieve universal primary education 5673 - Promote gender equality -4 - Reduce child mortality
6995 - Improve maternal health
6 - Combat HIVAIDS malaria amp other diseases
7 - Ensure environmental sustainability 19888 ndash Global partnership for development 1251
TOTAL 17447
Source NEDA-PIS
INTENSIFYING MULTISECTORAL PARTNERSHIP AND COLLABORATION
Government (executive legislature judicial)
Local Government
CSOsAcademe
Local Government
PrivateBusiness
Donor Community
Environmental Situationand Challenges
Goal 7 Ensure Environmental Sustainability
bull Forests resources and watersheds
bull Biodiversity resources
bull Coastal and marine resources
bull Air quality
bull Water resources
bull Waste and toxic chemicals
Area Proportion to Total
(Hectares) ()
7168400 100
2560872 36
Broadleaved 2448864
Mixed 24618
Coniferous 87390
4030588 56
Broadleaved 3847284
Mixed 69861
Coniferous 113443
247362 3
329578 5Source Forest Management Bureau (FMB)
Total Forest
Mangrove
Plantation
Forest Cover by Forest Type 2003
Closed Forest
Open Forest
Category
Area Reforested 1990-2003 (in hectares)Year Total
Government
Percent Non-Government
Percent
Sector
2003 15087 13195 875 1892 125
2002 25620 20682 807 4938 193
2001 31440 26524 844 4916 156
2000 27632 21740 787 5892 213
1999 42165 31183 74 10982 26
1998 42368 33219 784 9149 216
1997 66236 49301 744 16935 256
1996 46096 18869 409 27227 591
1995 65233 21841 335 43392 665
1994 49551 18032 364 31519 636
1993 19211 6347 33 12864 67
1992 40593 24304 599 16289 401
1991 93039 73602 791 19437 209
1990 191663 153949 803 37714 197
Annual Average
53995
Source DENR Annual Report
Biodiversity Resources
Philippineshellip one of the megadiverse countries in the
world higher regard for the endemism of local
species
buthellip most severely threatened of the
megadiverse countries
Coastal and Marine Resources rich sources of fish and aquatic products habitat for countless underwater wildlife natural areas for recreationtourism Water resourcesbull disparities in water supply coverage across regionsbull depletion of ground water especially in Metro
Manila and Metro Cebubull pollution of water sources
Air Qualitybull pollution remains a problem in Metro Manila and
major urban centersbull on the level of suspended particulates (TSP) air
quality is not within standards
Waste and Toxic Chemicalsbull solid waste generation in Metro Manila is estimated at
5345 tons per daybull urbanization inevitably increased the use of chemicalsbull no integrated treatment facility for hazardous waste
Priority Policies and Programs
bull Adoption of Sustainable Forest Management
bull Revised Forestry Code of the Philippines and the Watersheds Code
bull Various biodiversity acts
bull Fisheries Code and AFMA
bull Clean Air Act
Challenges and Priorities for Action
bull Sustainable and more productive utilization of natural resources
bull Focus and strengthen the protection of vulnerable and ecologically fragile areas
bull Create healthier environment for the populationbull Mitigate the occurrence of natural disasters bull Ensure environmental accountability for all
industries
CROSS-CUTTING CHALLENGEShellip
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005
Government Expenditure Program by Sector FY 2000-2005
Social Services Debt Service Economic Services General Public Services Defense
CROSSCUTTING CHALLENGES AND PRIORITIES FOR ACTION
Source DBM Budget of Expenditure and Sources of Financing
FINANCING THE MDGs
SectorYear 2001 2002 2003 2004
Economic Services 15982070 45484830 52853500 58700890
(15) (32) (33) (34)Social Services 28979110 26352690 34001700 36135990
(27) (19) (21) (21)General Public Services 63375820 69580140 73954470 78545740
(58) (49) (46) (45)Total Public Expenditures 108337000 141417660 160809670 173382620
FINANCING THE MDGs
Distribution of Public Expenditures by Local Government UnitsBy Sector 2001-2004 (in thousand pesos)
Source DBM Budget of Expenditure and Sources of Financing
CROSSCUTTING CHALLENGES AND PRIORITIES FOR ACTION
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
2001 2002 2003 2004
ODA Commitments by SectorFY 2001-2004 (US$ million)
Agriculture agrarianreform and naturalresources
Governance andinstitutionsdevelopment
Infrastructuredevelopment
Social reform anddevelopment
Industry and services
Source NEDA-PIS
CROSSCUTTING CHALLENGES AND PRIORITIES FOR ACTION
FINANCING THE MDGs
CROSS-CUTTING CHALLENGES AND
PRIORITIES FOR ACTIONbull Reduce disparities across regions
bull Increase resource allocation for MDG-related programs and projects
bull Enforce fullstricter implementation of laws amp ensure passage of MDG-supportive bills
bull Strengthen monitoring and implementation
bull Scale-up campaign for localization
bull Develop an advocacy plan
bull Intensify multisectoral partnership amp collaboration
Facilitating Factors bull Strong global support for MDGs by the United
Nations ASEAN and other multilateral organizations
bull Expanding national support among policymakers for MDGs (eg creation of the House Committee on MDGs issuance of EO on the MDGs)
bull Prioritization of MDGs in resource allocation (eg focusing of MTPIP investments on MDGs)
bull Increasing awareness and participation of private sector LGUs in MDG-related programs
Hindering Factors
bull Resource constraints (ie MDG financing gap of about $15 billion yearly)
bull Lack of support by creditors for the Debt for MDG ProjectsDebt for Equity in MDG Projects initiative
bull Low budgetary priority for MDGs accorded by some LGUs and
bull Lack of disaggregated data to monitor MDGs at local levels
Parallel Initiatives
Participation in the High-Level Plenary Meeting on MDGs
Formulation of the Plan of Action for Poverty Reduction (2006-2010)Enhance the current Poverty Reduction
Strategy and Program Framework
Advocacy for the Philippine proposal on Debt for Equity in MDG Projects
Implications on the Philippine Economy
MDG attainment would requirebull Enhanced revenue generationbull LGU private sector and civil society supportbull Expansion of microfinance services for the poorbull Pursuit of projects with high economic impactbull Right-sizing the bureaucracybull Privatization andbull Tapping OFW remittances
(1990 or Level 2015 Attaining theMDG year closest (20022004) 1 Targets
to 1990) 2
Eradicate extreme poverty and hunger underweight among 0-5 yo children 345 276 1725 MediumAchieve universal primary education
Elementary participation rate 3 851 a 9005 100 MediumImprove maternal healthMaternal mortality rate 209 172 c 522 Medium
Increase access to RH servicesContraceptive prevalence rate 40 b 489 70 Medium
Achieve universal primary education
Elementary cohort survival rate 684 a 698 833 Low
Muslim Children With the big percentage (93) of Muslim school-age population in the public school system the effective implementation of the national curriculum for Muslim education in the public school system is verycritical The overall goal of the curriculum is to develop the core competencies of Muslim children in order for them to function effectively in society within thecontext of their environment and culture and that of the wider community In the long run it will hopefully effectively address the economic social political problems in Muslim-dominated areas and the entire country in general
bull Children in Conflict-Affected Areas Convergence of support for the protection ofchildren especially those who are not educated from being vulnerable targets fortraining and indoctrination as fighters There is also a need to execute acovenant among and between concerned parties to protect schools as ldquopeacezonesrdquo
In summary the country was not able to attain its 2005 targets in almost all key outcome indicators in Early Childhood Education Formal Basic Education and Alternative Learning System
Most of the regions have performance classified asldquofalling further behindrdquo or with performance lower than the national level in 2002 and continued to decline in 2005 While substantial investments were poured into the establishment of basic education facilities these were not enough to ensure that all3-5 year olds are in Early Childhood Education learning centers and all school-aged children were in school and able to continue and eventually complete basic education with satisfactory achievement level The basic education system should 53 be responsive to the differentiated needs of learners where a ldquoone-size fit allrdquo or conventional interventions (such as construction of classrooms provision of textbooks etc) are not enough or will no longer work
MDG attainment would requireEnhanced revenue generationLGU private sector and civil society supportPursuit of projects with high economic impactandTapping OFW remittances
Working towards achieving one Goal will make us closer to achievement of the rest amp would reduce costs of achieving othersrdquo Eveline Herfkens
SDC Res No 1 2003 ldquoExpanding
functions and composition of
MC-IHDCrdquo
DILG MC 2004-152 ldquoGuide to LGUs in the
Localization of the MDGsrdquo
MTPDP 2004-2010 hews
closely to the MDGs
Strong commitment
of the business
sector and civil society
Investment identification per goal and target in MTPIP
2005-2010
Strong support of
donor community
for the MDGs
Legislative support of Congress
Enabling Environment for the MDGs
Poverty Situation
FIGURE 1 Poverty Incidence of Population by Region 2003
Legend
Below national average (73 - 304)Above national average(305 - 542)
Source
NSO Family Income and Expenditures Survey 2003
ARMM 531
Cordillera Region 312
Metro Manila 73
Ilocos Region 302
Cagayan Valley 245
Central Luzon 177
CALABARZON 188
MIMAROPA 479
Bicol Region 484
Western Visayas 391
Central Visayas 284
Eastern Visayas 433
Western Mindanao 494
Northern Mindanao 443
Southern Mindanao 344
Central Mindanao 384
CARAGA 542
Annual Per Capita Poverty Threshold Poverty Incidence of Families and Population by Region 2000 and 2003
2000 Revised 2003 2000 Revised 2003 2000 Revised 2003Philippines 11 451 12 267 275 247 330 304NCR 15 693 16 796 57 50 76 73CAR 13 066 13 976 307 248 376 312Region I 12 685 13 276 294 244 351 302Region II 11 128 11 409 252 193 304 245Region III 13 760 14 342 173 137 214 177Region IV-A 13 657 14 616 152 149 191 188Region IV-B 11 995 12 406 363 397 452 479Region V 11 372 12 354 453 405 526 484Region VI 11 313 12 275 366 313 444 391Region VII 9 656 9 779 315 237 362 284Region VIII 9 518 10 802 375 355 451 433Region IX 9 116 10 414 385 441 448 494Region X 10 503 11 609 379 379 438 443Region XI 10 264 11 276 277 281 331 344Region XII 10 466 11 303 407 320 468 384Caraga 10 896 12 000 437 473 509 542ARMM 12 192 12 739 537 457 598 531
Poverty Incidenceof Population ()Region
Annual Per Capita PovertyThreshold (in Pesos)
Poverty Incidenceof Families ()
FIGURE 2 Subsistence Incidence of Population by Region 2003
Legend
Below national average Above national average
Source
NSO_Family and Income Expenditure Study 2003
ARMM 241
Cordillera Region 134
Metro Manila 06
Ilocos Region 112
Cagayan Valley 76
Central Luzon 42
CALABARZON 49
MIMAROPA 229
Bicol Region 266
Western Visayas 177
Central Visayas 146
Eastern Visayas 21
Western Mindanao 328
Northern Mindanao 254
Southern Mindanao 176
Central Mindanao 184
CARAGA 31
Annual Per Capita Food Threshold Subsistence Incidence of Families and Population by Region 2000 and 2003
2000 Revised 2003 2000 Revised 2003 2000 Revised 2003Philippines 7 707 8 134 123 104 158 138NCR 9 570 9 974 07 04 10 06CAR 8 744 9 117 137 98 179 134Region I 8 552 8 903 114 81 152 112Region II 7 560 8 026 93 56 118 76Region III 8 764 9 338 42 29 55 42Region IV-A 8 782 9 189 51 37 65 49Region IV-B 8 078 8 339 174 177 241 229Region V 8 047 8 372 233 203 293 266Region VI 7 983 8 386 174 129 231 177Region VII 6 759 7 016 169 112 207 146Region VIII 7 080 7 696 191 155 248 210Region IX 6 574 7 245 210 279 258 328Region X 7 296 7 999 192 197 238 254Region XI 7 087 7 751 128 135 167 176Region XII 7 235 7 804 179 140 226 184Caraga 7 667 8 353 244 245 307 310ARMM 8 313 8 737 239 186 285 241
RegionAnnual Per Capita Food Subsistence Incidence Subsistence Incidence
Threshold (in Pesos) of Families () of Population ()
FIGURE 3 Gini Concentration Ratios by Region 2003
Legend
Below National AverageAbove National Average
ARMM 03464
Cordillera Region 04294
Metro Manila 0413
Ilocos Region 03968
Cagayan Valley 04411
Central Luzon 03486
CALABARZON 04058
MIMAROPA 04354
Bicol Region 04648
Western Visayas 04392
Central Visayas 04711
Eastern Visayas 04577
Western Mindanao 05197
Northern Mindanao 04768
Southern Mindanao 04583
Central Mindanao 04567
CARAGA 04294
Gini Coefficient Among Families by Region 2000 and 2003
Region2000 2003 Change
Philippines 04822 04660 -16NCR 04451 04130 -32CAR 04439 04294 -15Region I 04071 03968 -10Region II 04227 04411 18Region III 03591 03486 -11Region IV-A 04086 04058 -03Region IV-B 04076 04354 28Region V 04455 04648 19Region VI 04594 04392 -20Region VII 04691 04711 02Region VIII 04807 04577 -23Region IX 04732 05197 47Region X 04794 04768 -03Region XI 04318 04567 25Region XII 04631 04583 -05Caraga 04118 04294 18ARMM 03171 03464 29
GINI
FIGURE 4 Percentage of Households with Less than 100 Energy Adequacy
FIGURE 5 Percentage of Underweight Children 0-5 Year Olds
Meeting Goal 1 Eradicate Extreme Poverty and Hunger
Priority Policies and Programs
bull Kapit-Bisig Laban sa Kahirapan (KALAHI)
bull Enrolment of 7 million beneficiaries under the National Health Insurance Program (NHIP)
bull Wholesale portfolio of the Peoplersquos Credit and Finance Corporation (PCFC)
bull Implementation of asset reform programs
bull Delivery of human development services
MDGs Amount
(in US$ million)
Share to Total MDG-
Related ODA
1 - Eradicate extreme poverty amp hunger 62594 7740
2 - Achieve universal primary education 5579 690
3 - Promote gender equality 38 005
4 - Reduce child mortality 1399 173
5 - Improve maternal health 1570 194
6 - Combat HIVAIDS malaria amp other diseases 253 031
7 - Ensure environmental sustainability 94331 1167
TOTAL 80866 10000
Summary of ODA for completed amp ongoing projects by MDG category from 2001-2005 in million US$
Source NEDA-PMS
ODA for MDGs
INVESTMENTS SUPPORTIVE OF THE MDGs 2005-2010
MDGs COST
(in PhP Billion)
1 - Eradicate extreme poverty amp hunger 129422 - Achieve universal primary education 5673 - Promote gender equality -4 - Reduce child mortality
6995 - Improve maternal health
6 - Combat HIVAIDS malaria amp other diseases
7 - Ensure environmental sustainability 19888 ndash Global partnership for development 1251
TOTAL 17447
Source NEDA-PIS
INTENSIFYING MULTISECTORAL PARTNERSHIP AND COLLABORATION
Government (executive legislature judicial)
Local Government
CSOsAcademe
Local Government
PrivateBusiness
Donor Community
Environmental Situationand Challenges
Goal 7 Ensure Environmental Sustainability
bull Forests resources and watersheds
bull Biodiversity resources
bull Coastal and marine resources
bull Air quality
bull Water resources
bull Waste and toxic chemicals
Area Proportion to Total
(Hectares) ()
7168400 100
2560872 36
Broadleaved 2448864
Mixed 24618
Coniferous 87390
4030588 56
Broadleaved 3847284
Mixed 69861
Coniferous 113443
247362 3
329578 5Source Forest Management Bureau (FMB)
Total Forest
Mangrove
Plantation
Forest Cover by Forest Type 2003
Closed Forest
Open Forest
Category
Area Reforested 1990-2003 (in hectares)Year Total
Government
Percent Non-Government
Percent
Sector
2003 15087 13195 875 1892 125
2002 25620 20682 807 4938 193
2001 31440 26524 844 4916 156
2000 27632 21740 787 5892 213
1999 42165 31183 74 10982 26
1998 42368 33219 784 9149 216
1997 66236 49301 744 16935 256
1996 46096 18869 409 27227 591
1995 65233 21841 335 43392 665
1994 49551 18032 364 31519 636
1993 19211 6347 33 12864 67
1992 40593 24304 599 16289 401
1991 93039 73602 791 19437 209
1990 191663 153949 803 37714 197
Annual Average
53995
Source DENR Annual Report
Biodiversity Resources
Philippineshellip one of the megadiverse countries in the
world higher regard for the endemism of local
species
buthellip most severely threatened of the
megadiverse countries
Coastal and Marine Resources rich sources of fish and aquatic products habitat for countless underwater wildlife natural areas for recreationtourism Water resourcesbull disparities in water supply coverage across regionsbull depletion of ground water especially in Metro
Manila and Metro Cebubull pollution of water sources
Air Qualitybull pollution remains a problem in Metro Manila and
major urban centersbull on the level of suspended particulates (TSP) air
quality is not within standards
Waste and Toxic Chemicalsbull solid waste generation in Metro Manila is estimated at
5345 tons per daybull urbanization inevitably increased the use of chemicalsbull no integrated treatment facility for hazardous waste
Priority Policies and Programs
bull Adoption of Sustainable Forest Management
bull Revised Forestry Code of the Philippines and the Watersheds Code
bull Various biodiversity acts
bull Fisheries Code and AFMA
bull Clean Air Act
Challenges and Priorities for Action
bull Sustainable and more productive utilization of natural resources
bull Focus and strengthen the protection of vulnerable and ecologically fragile areas
bull Create healthier environment for the populationbull Mitigate the occurrence of natural disasters bull Ensure environmental accountability for all
industries
CROSS-CUTTING CHALLENGEShellip
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005
Government Expenditure Program by Sector FY 2000-2005
Social Services Debt Service Economic Services General Public Services Defense
CROSSCUTTING CHALLENGES AND PRIORITIES FOR ACTION
Source DBM Budget of Expenditure and Sources of Financing
FINANCING THE MDGs
SectorYear 2001 2002 2003 2004
Economic Services 15982070 45484830 52853500 58700890
(15) (32) (33) (34)Social Services 28979110 26352690 34001700 36135990
(27) (19) (21) (21)General Public Services 63375820 69580140 73954470 78545740
(58) (49) (46) (45)Total Public Expenditures 108337000 141417660 160809670 173382620
FINANCING THE MDGs
Distribution of Public Expenditures by Local Government UnitsBy Sector 2001-2004 (in thousand pesos)
Source DBM Budget of Expenditure and Sources of Financing
CROSSCUTTING CHALLENGES AND PRIORITIES FOR ACTION
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
2001 2002 2003 2004
ODA Commitments by SectorFY 2001-2004 (US$ million)
Agriculture agrarianreform and naturalresources
Governance andinstitutionsdevelopment
Infrastructuredevelopment
Social reform anddevelopment
Industry and services
Source NEDA-PIS
CROSSCUTTING CHALLENGES AND PRIORITIES FOR ACTION
FINANCING THE MDGs
CROSS-CUTTING CHALLENGES AND
PRIORITIES FOR ACTIONbull Reduce disparities across regions
bull Increase resource allocation for MDG-related programs and projects
bull Enforce fullstricter implementation of laws amp ensure passage of MDG-supportive bills
bull Strengthen monitoring and implementation
bull Scale-up campaign for localization
bull Develop an advocacy plan
bull Intensify multisectoral partnership amp collaboration
Facilitating Factors bull Strong global support for MDGs by the United
Nations ASEAN and other multilateral organizations
bull Expanding national support among policymakers for MDGs (eg creation of the House Committee on MDGs issuance of EO on the MDGs)
bull Prioritization of MDGs in resource allocation (eg focusing of MTPIP investments on MDGs)
bull Increasing awareness and participation of private sector LGUs in MDG-related programs
Hindering Factors
bull Resource constraints (ie MDG financing gap of about $15 billion yearly)
bull Lack of support by creditors for the Debt for MDG ProjectsDebt for Equity in MDG Projects initiative
bull Low budgetary priority for MDGs accorded by some LGUs and
bull Lack of disaggregated data to monitor MDGs at local levels
Parallel Initiatives
Participation in the High-Level Plenary Meeting on MDGs
Formulation of the Plan of Action for Poverty Reduction (2006-2010)Enhance the current Poverty Reduction
Strategy and Program Framework
Advocacy for the Philippine proposal on Debt for Equity in MDG Projects
Implications on the Philippine Economy
MDG attainment would requirebull Enhanced revenue generationbull LGU private sector and civil society supportbull Expansion of microfinance services for the poorbull Pursuit of projects with high economic impactbull Right-sizing the bureaucracybull Privatization andbull Tapping OFW remittances
bull Children in Conflict-Affected Areas Convergence of support for the protection ofchildren especially those who are not educated from being vulnerable targets fortraining and indoctrination as fighters There is also a need to execute acovenant among and between concerned parties to protect schools as ldquopeacezonesrdquo
In summary the country was not able to attain its 2005 targets in almost all key outcome indicators in Early Childhood Education Formal Basic Education and Alternative Learning System
Most of the regions have performance classified asldquofalling further behindrdquo or with performance lower than the national level in 2002 and continued to decline in 2005 While substantial investments were poured into the establishment of basic education facilities these were not enough to ensure that all3-5 year olds are in Early Childhood Education learning centers and all school-aged children were in school and able to continue and eventually complete basic education with satisfactory achievement level The basic education system should 53 be responsive to the differentiated needs of learners where a ldquoone-size fit allrdquo or conventional interventions (such as construction of classrooms provision of textbooks etc) are not enough or will no longer work
MDG attainment would requireEnhanced revenue generationLGU private sector and civil society supportPursuit of projects with high economic impactandTapping OFW remittances
Working towards achieving one Goal will make us closer to achievement of the rest amp would reduce costs of achieving othersrdquo Eveline Herfkens
SDC Res No 1 2003 ldquoExpanding
functions and composition of
MC-IHDCrdquo
DILG MC 2004-152 ldquoGuide to LGUs in the
Localization of the MDGsrdquo
MTPDP 2004-2010 hews
closely to the MDGs
Strong commitment
of the business
sector and civil society
Investment identification per goal and target in MTPIP
2005-2010
Strong support of
donor community
for the MDGs
Legislative support of Congress
Enabling Environment for the MDGs
Poverty Situation
FIGURE 1 Poverty Incidence of Population by Region 2003
Legend
Below national average (73 - 304)Above national average(305 - 542)
Source
NSO Family Income and Expenditures Survey 2003
ARMM 531
Cordillera Region 312
Metro Manila 73
Ilocos Region 302
Cagayan Valley 245
Central Luzon 177
CALABARZON 188
MIMAROPA 479
Bicol Region 484
Western Visayas 391
Central Visayas 284
Eastern Visayas 433
Western Mindanao 494
Northern Mindanao 443
Southern Mindanao 344
Central Mindanao 384
CARAGA 542
Annual Per Capita Poverty Threshold Poverty Incidence of Families and Population by Region 2000 and 2003
2000 Revised 2003 2000 Revised 2003 2000 Revised 2003Philippines 11 451 12 267 275 247 330 304NCR 15 693 16 796 57 50 76 73CAR 13 066 13 976 307 248 376 312Region I 12 685 13 276 294 244 351 302Region II 11 128 11 409 252 193 304 245Region III 13 760 14 342 173 137 214 177Region IV-A 13 657 14 616 152 149 191 188Region IV-B 11 995 12 406 363 397 452 479Region V 11 372 12 354 453 405 526 484Region VI 11 313 12 275 366 313 444 391Region VII 9 656 9 779 315 237 362 284Region VIII 9 518 10 802 375 355 451 433Region IX 9 116 10 414 385 441 448 494Region X 10 503 11 609 379 379 438 443Region XI 10 264 11 276 277 281 331 344Region XII 10 466 11 303 407 320 468 384Caraga 10 896 12 000 437 473 509 542ARMM 12 192 12 739 537 457 598 531
Poverty Incidenceof Population ()Region
Annual Per Capita PovertyThreshold (in Pesos)
Poverty Incidenceof Families ()
FIGURE 2 Subsistence Incidence of Population by Region 2003
Legend
Below national average Above national average
Source
NSO_Family and Income Expenditure Study 2003
ARMM 241
Cordillera Region 134
Metro Manila 06
Ilocos Region 112
Cagayan Valley 76
Central Luzon 42
CALABARZON 49
MIMAROPA 229
Bicol Region 266
Western Visayas 177
Central Visayas 146
Eastern Visayas 21
Western Mindanao 328
Northern Mindanao 254
Southern Mindanao 176
Central Mindanao 184
CARAGA 31
Annual Per Capita Food Threshold Subsistence Incidence of Families and Population by Region 2000 and 2003
2000 Revised 2003 2000 Revised 2003 2000 Revised 2003Philippines 7 707 8 134 123 104 158 138NCR 9 570 9 974 07 04 10 06CAR 8 744 9 117 137 98 179 134Region I 8 552 8 903 114 81 152 112Region II 7 560 8 026 93 56 118 76Region III 8 764 9 338 42 29 55 42Region IV-A 8 782 9 189 51 37 65 49Region IV-B 8 078 8 339 174 177 241 229Region V 8 047 8 372 233 203 293 266Region VI 7 983 8 386 174 129 231 177Region VII 6 759 7 016 169 112 207 146Region VIII 7 080 7 696 191 155 248 210Region IX 6 574 7 245 210 279 258 328Region X 7 296 7 999 192 197 238 254Region XI 7 087 7 751 128 135 167 176Region XII 7 235 7 804 179 140 226 184Caraga 7 667 8 353 244 245 307 310ARMM 8 313 8 737 239 186 285 241
RegionAnnual Per Capita Food Subsistence Incidence Subsistence Incidence
Threshold (in Pesos) of Families () of Population ()
FIGURE 3 Gini Concentration Ratios by Region 2003
Legend
Below National AverageAbove National Average
ARMM 03464
Cordillera Region 04294
Metro Manila 0413
Ilocos Region 03968
Cagayan Valley 04411
Central Luzon 03486
CALABARZON 04058
MIMAROPA 04354
Bicol Region 04648
Western Visayas 04392
Central Visayas 04711
Eastern Visayas 04577
Western Mindanao 05197
Northern Mindanao 04768
Southern Mindanao 04583
Central Mindanao 04567
CARAGA 04294
Gini Coefficient Among Families by Region 2000 and 2003
Region2000 2003 Change
Philippines 04822 04660 -16NCR 04451 04130 -32CAR 04439 04294 -15Region I 04071 03968 -10Region II 04227 04411 18Region III 03591 03486 -11Region IV-A 04086 04058 -03Region IV-B 04076 04354 28Region V 04455 04648 19Region VI 04594 04392 -20Region VII 04691 04711 02Region VIII 04807 04577 -23Region IX 04732 05197 47Region X 04794 04768 -03Region XI 04318 04567 25Region XII 04631 04583 -05Caraga 04118 04294 18ARMM 03171 03464 29
GINI
FIGURE 4 Percentage of Households with Less than 100 Energy Adequacy
FIGURE 5 Percentage of Underweight Children 0-5 Year Olds
Meeting Goal 1 Eradicate Extreme Poverty and Hunger
Priority Policies and Programs
bull Kapit-Bisig Laban sa Kahirapan (KALAHI)
bull Enrolment of 7 million beneficiaries under the National Health Insurance Program (NHIP)
bull Wholesale portfolio of the Peoplersquos Credit and Finance Corporation (PCFC)
bull Implementation of asset reform programs
bull Delivery of human development services
MDGs Amount
(in US$ million)
Share to Total MDG-
Related ODA
1 - Eradicate extreme poverty amp hunger 62594 7740
2 - Achieve universal primary education 5579 690
3 - Promote gender equality 38 005
4 - Reduce child mortality 1399 173
5 - Improve maternal health 1570 194
6 - Combat HIVAIDS malaria amp other diseases 253 031
7 - Ensure environmental sustainability 94331 1167
TOTAL 80866 10000
Summary of ODA for completed amp ongoing projects by MDG category from 2001-2005 in million US$
Source NEDA-PMS
ODA for MDGs
INVESTMENTS SUPPORTIVE OF THE MDGs 2005-2010
MDGs COST
(in PhP Billion)
1 - Eradicate extreme poverty amp hunger 129422 - Achieve universal primary education 5673 - Promote gender equality -4 - Reduce child mortality
6995 - Improve maternal health
6 - Combat HIVAIDS malaria amp other diseases
7 - Ensure environmental sustainability 19888 ndash Global partnership for development 1251
TOTAL 17447
Source NEDA-PIS
INTENSIFYING MULTISECTORAL PARTNERSHIP AND COLLABORATION
Government (executive legislature judicial)
Local Government
CSOsAcademe
Local Government
PrivateBusiness
Donor Community
Environmental Situationand Challenges
Goal 7 Ensure Environmental Sustainability
bull Forests resources and watersheds
bull Biodiversity resources
bull Coastal and marine resources
bull Air quality
bull Water resources
bull Waste and toxic chemicals
Area Proportion to Total
(Hectares) ()
7168400 100
2560872 36
Broadleaved 2448864
Mixed 24618
Coniferous 87390
4030588 56
Broadleaved 3847284
Mixed 69861
Coniferous 113443
247362 3
329578 5Source Forest Management Bureau (FMB)
Total Forest
Mangrove
Plantation
Forest Cover by Forest Type 2003
Closed Forest
Open Forest
Category
Area Reforested 1990-2003 (in hectares)Year Total
Government
Percent Non-Government
Percent
Sector
2003 15087 13195 875 1892 125
2002 25620 20682 807 4938 193
2001 31440 26524 844 4916 156
2000 27632 21740 787 5892 213
1999 42165 31183 74 10982 26
1998 42368 33219 784 9149 216
1997 66236 49301 744 16935 256
1996 46096 18869 409 27227 591
1995 65233 21841 335 43392 665
1994 49551 18032 364 31519 636
1993 19211 6347 33 12864 67
1992 40593 24304 599 16289 401
1991 93039 73602 791 19437 209
1990 191663 153949 803 37714 197
Annual Average
53995
Source DENR Annual Report
Biodiversity Resources
Philippineshellip one of the megadiverse countries in the
world higher regard for the endemism of local
species
buthellip most severely threatened of the
megadiverse countries
Coastal and Marine Resources rich sources of fish and aquatic products habitat for countless underwater wildlife natural areas for recreationtourism Water resourcesbull disparities in water supply coverage across regionsbull depletion of ground water especially in Metro
Manila and Metro Cebubull pollution of water sources
Air Qualitybull pollution remains a problem in Metro Manila and
major urban centersbull on the level of suspended particulates (TSP) air
quality is not within standards
Waste and Toxic Chemicalsbull solid waste generation in Metro Manila is estimated at
5345 tons per daybull urbanization inevitably increased the use of chemicalsbull no integrated treatment facility for hazardous waste
Priority Policies and Programs
bull Adoption of Sustainable Forest Management
bull Revised Forestry Code of the Philippines and the Watersheds Code
bull Various biodiversity acts
bull Fisheries Code and AFMA
bull Clean Air Act
Challenges and Priorities for Action
bull Sustainable and more productive utilization of natural resources
bull Focus and strengthen the protection of vulnerable and ecologically fragile areas
bull Create healthier environment for the populationbull Mitigate the occurrence of natural disasters bull Ensure environmental accountability for all
industries
CROSS-CUTTING CHALLENGEShellip
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005
Government Expenditure Program by Sector FY 2000-2005
Social Services Debt Service Economic Services General Public Services Defense
CROSSCUTTING CHALLENGES AND PRIORITIES FOR ACTION
Source DBM Budget of Expenditure and Sources of Financing
FINANCING THE MDGs
SectorYear 2001 2002 2003 2004
Economic Services 15982070 45484830 52853500 58700890
(15) (32) (33) (34)Social Services 28979110 26352690 34001700 36135990
(27) (19) (21) (21)General Public Services 63375820 69580140 73954470 78545740
(58) (49) (46) (45)Total Public Expenditures 108337000 141417660 160809670 173382620
FINANCING THE MDGs
Distribution of Public Expenditures by Local Government UnitsBy Sector 2001-2004 (in thousand pesos)
Source DBM Budget of Expenditure and Sources of Financing
CROSSCUTTING CHALLENGES AND PRIORITIES FOR ACTION
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
2001 2002 2003 2004
ODA Commitments by SectorFY 2001-2004 (US$ million)
Agriculture agrarianreform and naturalresources
Governance andinstitutionsdevelopment
Infrastructuredevelopment
Social reform anddevelopment
Industry and services
Source NEDA-PIS
CROSSCUTTING CHALLENGES AND PRIORITIES FOR ACTION
FINANCING THE MDGs
CROSS-CUTTING CHALLENGES AND
PRIORITIES FOR ACTIONbull Reduce disparities across regions
bull Increase resource allocation for MDG-related programs and projects
bull Enforce fullstricter implementation of laws amp ensure passage of MDG-supportive bills
bull Strengthen monitoring and implementation
bull Scale-up campaign for localization
bull Develop an advocacy plan
bull Intensify multisectoral partnership amp collaboration
Facilitating Factors bull Strong global support for MDGs by the United
Nations ASEAN and other multilateral organizations
bull Expanding national support among policymakers for MDGs (eg creation of the House Committee on MDGs issuance of EO on the MDGs)
bull Prioritization of MDGs in resource allocation (eg focusing of MTPIP investments on MDGs)
bull Increasing awareness and participation of private sector LGUs in MDG-related programs
Hindering Factors
bull Resource constraints (ie MDG financing gap of about $15 billion yearly)
bull Lack of support by creditors for the Debt for MDG ProjectsDebt for Equity in MDG Projects initiative
bull Low budgetary priority for MDGs accorded by some LGUs and
bull Lack of disaggregated data to monitor MDGs at local levels
Parallel Initiatives
Participation in the High-Level Plenary Meeting on MDGs
Formulation of the Plan of Action for Poverty Reduction (2006-2010)Enhance the current Poverty Reduction
Strategy and Program Framework
Advocacy for the Philippine proposal on Debt for Equity in MDG Projects
Implications on the Philippine Economy
MDG attainment would requirebull Enhanced revenue generationbull LGU private sector and civil society supportbull Expansion of microfinance services for the poorbull Pursuit of projects with high economic impactbull Right-sizing the bureaucracybull Privatization andbull Tapping OFW remittances
In summary the country was not able to attain its 2005 targets in almost all key outcome indicators in Early Childhood Education Formal Basic Education and Alternative Learning System
Most of the regions have performance classified asldquofalling further behindrdquo or with performance lower than the national level in 2002 and continued to decline in 2005 While substantial investments were poured into the establishment of basic education facilities these were not enough to ensure that all3-5 year olds are in Early Childhood Education learning centers and all school-aged children were in school and able to continue and eventually complete basic education with satisfactory achievement level The basic education system should 53 be responsive to the differentiated needs of learners where a ldquoone-size fit allrdquo or conventional interventions (such as construction of classrooms provision of textbooks etc) are not enough or will no longer work
MDG attainment would requireEnhanced revenue generationLGU private sector and civil society supportPursuit of projects with high economic impactandTapping OFW remittances
Working towards achieving one Goal will make us closer to achievement of the rest amp would reduce costs of achieving othersrdquo Eveline Herfkens
SDC Res No 1 2003 ldquoExpanding
functions and composition of
MC-IHDCrdquo
DILG MC 2004-152 ldquoGuide to LGUs in the
Localization of the MDGsrdquo
MTPDP 2004-2010 hews
closely to the MDGs
Strong commitment
of the business
sector and civil society
Investment identification per goal and target in MTPIP
2005-2010
Strong support of
donor community
for the MDGs
Legislative support of Congress
Enabling Environment for the MDGs
Poverty Situation
FIGURE 1 Poverty Incidence of Population by Region 2003
Legend
Below national average (73 - 304)Above national average(305 - 542)
Source
NSO Family Income and Expenditures Survey 2003
ARMM 531
Cordillera Region 312
Metro Manila 73
Ilocos Region 302
Cagayan Valley 245
Central Luzon 177
CALABARZON 188
MIMAROPA 479
Bicol Region 484
Western Visayas 391
Central Visayas 284
Eastern Visayas 433
Western Mindanao 494
Northern Mindanao 443
Southern Mindanao 344
Central Mindanao 384
CARAGA 542
Annual Per Capita Poverty Threshold Poverty Incidence of Families and Population by Region 2000 and 2003
2000 Revised 2003 2000 Revised 2003 2000 Revised 2003Philippines 11 451 12 267 275 247 330 304NCR 15 693 16 796 57 50 76 73CAR 13 066 13 976 307 248 376 312Region I 12 685 13 276 294 244 351 302Region II 11 128 11 409 252 193 304 245Region III 13 760 14 342 173 137 214 177Region IV-A 13 657 14 616 152 149 191 188Region IV-B 11 995 12 406 363 397 452 479Region V 11 372 12 354 453 405 526 484Region VI 11 313 12 275 366 313 444 391Region VII 9 656 9 779 315 237 362 284Region VIII 9 518 10 802 375 355 451 433Region IX 9 116 10 414 385 441 448 494Region X 10 503 11 609 379 379 438 443Region XI 10 264 11 276 277 281 331 344Region XII 10 466 11 303 407 320 468 384Caraga 10 896 12 000 437 473 509 542ARMM 12 192 12 739 537 457 598 531
Poverty Incidenceof Population ()Region
Annual Per Capita PovertyThreshold (in Pesos)
Poverty Incidenceof Families ()
FIGURE 2 Subsistence Incidence of Population by Region 2003
Legend
Below national average Above national average
Source
NSO_Family and Income Expenditure Study 2003
ARMM 241
Cordillera Region 134
Metro Manila 06
Ilocos Region 112
Cagayan Valley 76
Central Luzon 42
CALABARZON 49
MIMAROPA 229
Bicol Region 266
Western Visayas 177
Central Visayas 146
Eastern Visayas 21
Western Mindanao 328
Northern Mindanao 254
Southern Mindanao 176
Central Mindanao 184
CARAGA 31
Annual Per Capita Food Threshold Subsistence Incidence of Families and Population by Region 2000 and 2003
2000 Revised 2003 2000 Revised 2003 2000 Revised 2003Philippines 7 707 8 134 123 104 158 138NCR 9 570 9 974 07 04 10 06CAR 8 744 9 117 137 98 179 134Region I 8 552 8 903 114 81 152 112Region II 7 560 8 026 93 56 118 76Region III 8 764 9 338 42 29 55 42Region IV-A 8 782 9 189 51 37 65 49Region IV-B 8 078 8 339 174 177 241 229Region V 8 047 8 372 233 203 293 266Region VI 7 983 8 386 174 129 231 177Region VII 6 759 7 016 169 112 207 146Region VIII 7 080 7 696 191 155 248 210Region IX 6 574 7 245 210 279 258 328Region X 7 296 7 999 192 197 238 254Region XI 7 087 7 751 128 135 167 176Region XII 7 235 7 804 179 140 226 184Caraga 7 667 8 353 244 245 307 310ARMM 8 313 8 737 239 186 285 241
RegionAnnual Per Capita Food Subsistence Incidence Subsistence Incidence
Threshold (in Pesos) of Families () of Population ()
FIGURE 3 Gini Concentration Ratios by Region 2003
Legend
Below National AverageAbove National Average
ARMM 03464
Cordillera Region 04294
Metro Manila 0413
Ilocos Region 03968
Cagayan Valley 04411
Central Luzon 03486
CALABARZON 04058
MIMAROPA 04354
Bicol Region 04648
Western Visayas 04392
Central Visayas 04711
Eastern Visayas 04577
Western Mindanao 05197
Northern Mindanao 04768
Southern Mindanao 04583
Central Mindanao 04567
CARAGA 04294
Gini Coefficient Among Families by Region 2000 and 2003
Region2000 2003 Change
Philippines 04822 04660 -16NCR 04451 04130 -32CAR 04439 04294 -15Region I 04071 03968 -10Region II 04227 04411 18Region III 03591 03486 -11Region IV-A 04086 04058 -03Region IV-B 04076 04354 28Region V 04455 04648 19Region VI 04594 04392 -20Region VII 04691 04711 02Region VIII 04807 04577 -23Region IX 04732 05197 47Region X 04794 04768 -03Region XI 04318 04567 25Region XII 04631 04583 -05Caraga 04118 04294 18ARMM 03171 03464 29
GINI
FIGURE 4 Percentage of Households with Less than 100 Energy Adequacy
FIGURE 5 Percentage of Underweight Children 0-5 Year Olds
Meeting Goal 1 Eradicate Extreme Poverty and Hunger
Priority Policies and Programs
bull Kapit-Bisig Laban sa Kahirapan (KALAHI)
bull Enrolment of 7 million beneficiaries under the National Health Insurance Program (NHIP)
bull Wholesale portfolio of the Peoplersquos Credit and Finance Corporation (PCFC)
bull Implementation of asset reform programs
bull Delivery of human development services
MDGs Amount
(in US$ million)
Share to Total MDG-
Related ODA
1 - Eradicate extreme poverty amp hunger 62594 7740
2 - Achieve universal primary education 5579 690
3 - Promote gender equality 38 005
4 - Reduce child mortality 1399 173
5 - Improve maternal health 1570 194
6 - Combat HIVAIDS malaria amp other diseases 253 031
7 - Ensure environmental sustainability 94331 1167
TOTAL 80866 10000
Summary of ODA for completed amp ongoing projects by MDG category from 2001-2005 in million US$
Source NEDA-PMS
ODA for MDGs
INVESTMENTS SUPPORTIVE OF THE MDGs 2005-2010
MDGs COST
(in PhP Billion)
1 - Eradicate extreme poverty amp hunger 129422 - Achieve universal primary education 5673 - Promote gender equality -4 - Reduce child mortality
6995 - Improve maternal health
6 - Combat HIVAIDS malaria amp other diseases
7 - Ensure environmental sustainability 19888 ndash Global partnership for development 1251
TOTAL 17447
Source NEDA-PIS
INTENSIFYING MULTISECTORAL PARTNERSHIP AND COLLABORATION
Government (executive legislature judicial)
Local Government
CSOsAcademe
Local Government
PrivateBusiness
Donor Community
Environmental Situationand Challenges
Goal 7 Ensure Environmental Sustainability
bull Forests resources and watersheds
bull Biodiversity resources
bull Coastal and marine resources
bull Air quality
bull Water resources
bull Waste and toxic chemicals
Area Proportion to Total
(Hectares) ()
7168400 100
2560872 36
Broadleaved 2448864
Mixed 24618
Coniferous 87390
4030588 56
Broadleaved 3847284
Mixed 69861
Coniferous 113443
247362 3
329578 5Source Forest Management Bureau (FMB)
Total Forest
Mangrove
Plantation
Forest Cover by Forest Type 2003
Closed Forest
Open Forest
Category
Area Reforested 1990-2003 (in hectares)Year Total
Government
Percent Non-Government
Percent
Sector
2003 15087 13195 875 1892 125
2002 25620 20682 807 4938 193
2001 31440 26524 844 4916 156
2000 27632 21740 787 5892 213
1999 42165 31183 74 10982 26
1998 42368 33219 784 9149 216
1997 66236 49301 744 16935 256
1996 46096 18869 409 27227 591
1995 65233 21841 335 43392 665
1994 49551 18032 364 31519 636
1993 19211 6347 33 12864 67
1992 40593 24304 599 16289 401
1991 93039 73602 791 19437 209
1990 191663 153949 803 37714 197
Annual Average
53995
Source DENR Annual Report
Biodiversity Resources
Philippineshellip one of the megadiverse countries in the
world higher regard for the endemism of local
species
buthellip most severely threatened of the
megadiverse countries
Coastal and Marine Resources rich sources of fish and aquatic products habitat for countless underwater wildlife natural areas for recreationtourism Water resourcesbull disparities in water supply coverage across regionsbull depletion of ground water especially in Metro
Manila and Metro Cebubull pollution of water sources
Air Qualitybull pollution remains a problem in Metro Manila and
major urban centersbull on the level of suspended particulates (TSP) air
quality is not within standards
Waste and Toxic Chemicalsbull solid waste generation in Metro Manila is estimated at
5345 tons per daybull urbanization inevitably increased the use of chemicalsbull no integrated treatment facility for hazardous waste
Priority Policies and Programs
bull Adoption of Sustainable Forest Management
bull Revised Forestry Code of the Philippines and the Watersheds Code
bull Various biodiversity acts
bull Fisheries Code and AFMA
bull Clean Air Act
Challenges and Priorities for Action
bull Sustainable and more productive utilization of natural resources
bull Focus and strengthen the protection of vulnerable and ecologically fragile areas
bull Create healthier environment for the populationbull Mitigate the occurrence of natural disasters bull Ensure environmental accountability for all
industries
CROSS-CUTTING CHALLENGEShellip
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005
Government Expenditure Program by Sector FY 2000-2005
Social Services Debt Service Economic Services General Public Services Defense
CROSSCUTTING CHALLENGES AND PRIORITIES FOR ACTION
Source DBM Budget of Expenditure and Sources of Financing
FINANCING THE MDGs
SectorYear 2001 2002 2003 2004
Economic Services 15982070 45484830 52853500 58700890
(15) (32) (33) (34)Social Services 28979110 26352690 34001700 36135990
(27) (19) (21) (21)General Public Services 63375820 69580140 73954470 78545740
(58) (49) (46) (45)Total Public Expenditures 108337000 141417660 160809670 173382620
FINANCING THE MDGs
Distribution of Public Expenditures by Local Government UnitsBy Sector 2001-2004 (in thousand pesos)
Source DBM Budget of Expenditure and Sources of Financing
CROSSCUTTING CHALLENGES AND PRIORITIES FOR ACTION
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
2001 2002 2003 2004
ODA Commitments by SectorFY 2001-2004 (US$ million)
Agriculture agrarianreform and naturalresources
Governance andinstitutionsdevelopment
Infrastructuredevelopment
Social reform anddevelopment
Industry and services
Source NEDA-PIS
CROSSCUTTING CHALLENGES AND PRIORITIES FOR ACTION
FINANCING THE MDGs
CROSS-CUTTING CHALLENGES AND
PRIORITIES FOR ACTIONbull Reduce disparities across regions
bull Increase resource allocation for MDG-related programs and projects
bull Enforce fullstricter implementation of laws amp ensure passage of MDG-supportive bills
bull Strengthen monitoring and implementation
bull Scale-up campaign for localization
bull Develop an advocacy plan
bull Intensify multisectoral partnership amp collaboration
Facilitating Factors bull Strong global support for MDGs by the United
Nations ASEAN and other multilateral organizations
bull Expanding national support among policymakers for MDGs (eg creation of the House Committee on MDGs issuance of EO on the MDGs)
bull Prioritization of MDGs in resource allocation (eg focusing of MTPIP investments on MDGs)
bull Increasing awareness and participation of private sector LGUs in MDG-related programs
Hindering Factors
bull Resource constraints (ie MDG financing gap of about $15 billion yearly)
bull Lack of support by creditors for the Debt for MDG ProjectsDebt for Equity in MDG Projects initiative
bull Low budgetary priority for MDGs accorded by some LGUs and
bull Lack of disaggregated data to monitor MDGs at local levels
Parallel Initiatives
Participation in the High-Level Plenary Meeting on MDGs
Formulation of the Plan of Action for Poverty Reduction (2006-2010)Enhance the current Poverty Reduction
Strategy and Program Framework
Advocacy for the Philippine proposal on Debt for Equity in MDG Projects
Implications on the Philippine Economy
MDG attainment would requirebull Enhanced revenue generationbull LGU private sector and civil society supportbull Expansion of microfinance services for the poorbull Pursuit of projects with high economic impactbull Right-sizing the bureaucracybull Privatization andbull Tapping OFW remittances
MDG attainment would requireEnhanced revenue generationLGU private sector and civil society supportPursuit of projects with high economic impactandTapping OFW remittances
Working towards achieving one Goal will make us closer to achievement of the rest amp would reduce costs of achieving othersrdquo Eveline Herfkens
SDC Res No 1 2003 ldquoExpanding
functions and composition of
MC-IHDCrdquo
DILG MC 2004-152 ldquoGuide to LGUs in the
Localization of the MDGsrdquo
MTPDP 2004-2010 hews
closely to the MDGs
Strong commitment
of the business
sector and civil society
Investment identification per goal and target in MTPIP
2005-2010
Strong support of
donor community
for the MDGs
Legislative support of Congress
Enabling Environment for the MDGs
Poverty Situation
FIGURE 1 Poverty Incidence of Population by Region 2003
Legend
Below national average (73 - 304)Above national average(305 - 542)
Source
NSO Family Income and Expenditures Survey 2003
ARMM 531
Cordillera Region 312
Metro Manila 73
Ilocos Region 302
Cagayan Valley 245
Central Luzon 177
CALABARZON 188
MIMAROPA 479
Bicol Region 484
Western Visayas 391
Central Visayas 284
Eastern Visayas 433
Western Mindanao 494
Northern Mindanao 443
Southern Mindanao 344
Central Mindanao 384
CARAGA 542
Annual Per Capita Poverty Threshold Poverty Incidence of Families and Population by Region 2000 and 2003
2000 Revised 2003 2000 Revised 2003 2000 Revised 2003Philippines 11 451 12 267 275 247 330 304NCR 15 693 16 796 57 50 76 73CAR 13 066 13 976 307 248 376 312Region I 12 685 13 276 294 244 351 302Region II 11 128 11 409 252 193 304 245Region III 13 760 14 342 173 137 214 177Region IV-A 13 657 14 616 152 149 191 188Region IV-B 11 995 12 406 363 397 452 479Region V 11 372 12 354 453 405 526 484Region VI 11 313 12 275 366 313 444 391Region VII 9 656 9 779 315 237 362 284Region VIII 9 518 10 802 375 355 451 433Region IX 9 116 10 414 385 441 448 494Region X 10 503 11 609 379 379 438 443Region XI 10 264 11 276 277 281 331 344Region XII 10 466 11 303 407 320 468 384Caraga 10 896 12 000 437 473 509 542ARMM 12 192 12 739 537 457 598 531
Poverty Incidenceof Population ()Region
Annual Per Capita PovertyThreshold (in Pesos)
Poverty Incidenceof Families ()
FIGURE 2 Subsistence Incidence of Population by Region 2003
Legend
Below national average Above national average
Source
NSO_Family and Income Expenditure Study 2003
ARMM 241
Cordillera Region 134
Metro Manila 06
Ilocos Region 112
Cagayan Valley 76
Central Luzon 42
CALABARZON 49
MIMAROPA 229
Bicol Region 266
Western Visayas 177
Central Visayas 146
Eastern Visayas 21
Western Mindanao 328
Northern Mindanao 254
Southern Mindanao 176
Central Mindanao 184
CARAGA 31
Annual Per Capita Food Threshold Subsistence Incidence of Families and Population by Region 2000 and 2003
2000 Revised 2003 2000 Revised 2003 2000 Revised 2003Philippines 7 707 8 134 123 104 158 138NCR 9 570 9 974 07 04 10 06CAR 8 744 9 117 137 98 179 134Region I 8 552 8 903 114 81 152 112Region II 7 560 8 026 93 56 118 76Region III 8 764 9 338 42 29 55 42Region IV-A 8 782 9 189 51 37 65 49Region IV-B 8 078 8 339 174 177 241 229Region V 8 047 8 372 233 203 293 266Region VI 7 983 8 386 174 129 231 177Region VII 6 759 7 016 169 112 207 146Region VIII 7 080 7 696 191 155 248 210Region IX 6 574 7 245 210 279 258 328Region X 7 296 7 999 192 197 238 254Region XI 7 087 7 751 128 135 167 176Region XII 7 235 7 804 179 140 226 184Caraga 7 667 8 353 244 245 307 310ARMM 8 313 8 737 239 186 285 241
RegionAnnual Per Capita Food Subsistence Incidence Subsistence Incidence
Threshold (in Pesos) of Families () of Population ()
FIGURE 3 Gini Concentration Ratios by Region 2003
Legend
Below National AverageAbove National Average
ARMM 03464
Cordillera Region 04294
Metro Manila 0413
Ilocos Region 03968
Cagayan Valley 04411
Central Luzon 03486
CALABARZON 04058
MIMAROPA 04354
Bicol Region 04648
Western Visayas 04392
Central Visayas 04711
Eastern Visayas 04577
Western Mindanao 05197
Northern Mindanao 04768
Southern Mindanao 04583
Central Mindanao 04567
CARAGA 04294
Gini Coefficient Among Families by Region 2000 and 2003
Region2000 2003 Change
Philippines 04822 04660 -16NCR 04451 04130 -32CAR 04439 04294 -15Region I 04071 03968 -10Region II 04227 04411 18Region III 03591 03486 -11Region IV-A 04086 04058 -03Region IV-B 04076 04354 28Region V 04455 04648 19Region VI 04594 04392 -20Region VII 04691 04711 02Region VIII 04807 04577 -23Region IX 04732 05197 47Region X 04794 04768 -03Region XI 04318 04567 25Region XII 04631 04583 -05Caraga 04118 04294 18ARMM 03171 03464 29
GINI
FIGURE 4 Percentage of Households with Less than 100 Energy Adequacy
FIGURE 5 Percentage of Underweight Children 0-5 Year Olds
Meeting Goal 1 Eradicate Extreme Poverty and Hunger
Priority Policies and Programs
bull Kapit-Bisig Laban sa Kahirapan (KALAHI)
bull Enrolment of 7 million beneficiaries under the National Health Insurance Program (NHIP)
bull Wholesale portfolio of the Peoplersquos Credit and Finance Corporation (PCFC)
bull Implementation of asset reform programs
bull Delivery of human development services
MDGs Amount
(in US$ million)
Share to Total MDG-
Related ODA
1 - Eradicate extreme poverty amp hunger 62594 7740
2 - Achieve universal primary education 5579 690
3 - Promote gender equality 38 005
4 - Reduce child mortality 1399 173
5 - Improve maternal health 1570 194
6 - Combat HIVAIDS malaria amp other diseases 253 031
7 - Ensure environmental sustainability 94331 1167
TOTAL 80866 10000
Summary of ODA for completed amp ongoing projects by MDG category from 2001-2005 in million US$
Source NEDA-PMS
ODA for MDGs
INVESTMENTS SUPPORTIVE OF THE MDGs 2005-2010
MDGs COST
(in PhP Billion)
1 - Eradicate extreme poverty amp hunger 129422 - Achieve universal primary education 5673 - Promote gender equality -4 - Reduce child mortality
6995 - Improve maternal health
6 - Combat HIVAIDS malaria amp other diseases
7 - Ensure environmental sustainability 19888 ndash Global partnership for development 1251
TOTAL 17447
Source NEDA-PIS
INTENSIFYING MULTISECTORAL PARTNERSHIP AND COLLABORATION
Government (executive legislature judicial)
Local Government
CSOsAcademe
Local Government
PrivateBusiness
Donor Community
Environmental Situationand Challenges
Goal 7 Ensure Environmental Sustainability
bull Forests resources and watersheds
bull Biodiversity resources
bull Coastal and marine resources
bull Air quality
bull Water resources
bull Waste and toxic chemicals
Area Proportion to Total
(Hectares) ()
7168400 100
2560872 36
Broadleaved 2448864
Mixed 24618
Coniferous 87390
4030588 56
Broadleaved 3847284
Mixed 69861
Coniferous 113443
247362 3
329578 5Source Forest Management Bureau (FMB)
Total Forest
Mangrove
Plantation
Forest Cover by Forest Type 2003
Closed Forest
Open Forest
Category
Area Reforested 1990-2003 (in hectares)Year Total
Government
Percent Non-Government
Percent
Sector
2003 15087 13195 875 1892 125
2002 25620 20682 807 4938 193
2001 31440 26524 844 4916 156
2000 27632 21740 787 5892 213
1999 42165 31183 74 10982 26
1998 42368 33219 784 9149 216
1997 66236 49301 744 16935 256
1996 46096 18869 409 27227 591
1995 65233 21841 335 43392 665
1994 49551 18032 364 31519 636
1993 19211 6347 33 12864 67
1992 40593 24304 599 16289 401
1991 93039 73602 791 19437 209
1990 191663 153949 803 37714 197
Annual Average
53995
Source DENR Annual Report
Biodiversity Resources
Philippineshellip one of the megadiverse countries in the
world higher regard for the endemism of local
species
buthellip most severely threatened of the
megadiverse countries
Coastal and Marine Resources rich sources of fish and aquatic products habitat for countless underwater wildlife natural areas for recreationtourism Water resourcesbull disparities in water supply coverage across regionsbull depletion of ground water especially in Metro
Manila and Metro Cebubull pollution of water sources
Air Qualitybull pollution remains a problem in Metro Manila and
major urban centersbull on the level of suspended particulates (TSP) air
quality is not within standards
Waste and Toxic Chemicalsbull solid waste generation in Metro Manila is estimated at
5345 tons per daybull urbanization inevitably increased the use of chemicalsbull no integrated treatment facility for hazardous waste
Priority Policies and Programs
bull Adoption of Sustainable Forest Management
bull Revised Forestry Code of the Philippines and the Watersheds Code
bull Various biodiversity acts
bull Fisheries Code and AFMA
bull Clean Air Act
Challenges and Priorities for Action
bull Sustainable and more productive utilization of natural resources
bull Focus and strengthen the protection of vulnerable and ecologically fragile areas
bull Create healthier environment for the populationbull Mitigate the occurrence of natural disasters bull Ensure environmental accountability for all
industries
CROSS-CUTTING CHALLENGEShellip
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005
Government Expenditure Program by Sector FY 2000-2005
Social Services Debt Service Economic Services General Public Services Defense
CROSSCUTTING CHALLENGES AND PRIORITIES FOR ACTION
Source DBM Budget of Expenditure and Sources of Financing
FINANCING THE MDGs
SectorYear 2001 2002 2003 2004
Economic Services 15982070 45484830 52853500 58700890
(15) (32) (33) (34)Social Services 28979110 26352690 34001700 36135990
(27) (19) (21) (21)General Public Services 63375820 69580140 73954470 78545740
(58) (49) (46) (45)Total Public Expenditures 108337000 141417660 160809670 173382620
FINANCING THE MDGs
Distribution of Public Expenditures by Local Government UnitsBy Sector 2001-2004 (in thousand pesos)
Source DBM Budget of Expenditure and Sources of Financing
CROSSCUTTING CHALLENGES AND PRIORITIES FOR ACTION
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
2001 2002 2003 2004
ODA Commitments by SectorFY 2001-2004 (US$ million)
Agriculture agrarianreform and naturalresources
Governance andinstitutionsdevelopment
Infrastructuredevelopment
Social reform anddevelopment
Industry and services
Source NEDA-PIS
CROSSCUTTING CHALLENGES AND PRIORITIES FOR ACTION
FINANCING THE MDGs
CROSS-CUTTING CHALLENGES AND
PRIORITIES FOR ACTIONbull Reduce disparities across regions
bull Increase resource allocation for MDG-related programs and projects
bull Enforce fullstricter implementation of laws amp ensure passage of MDG-supportive bills
bull Strengthen monitoring and implementation
bull Scale-up campaign for localization
bull Develop an advocacy plan
bull Intensify multisectoral partnership amp collaboration
Facilitating Factors bull Strong global support for MDGs by the United
Nations ASEAN and other multilateral organizations
bull Expanding national support among policymakers for MDGs (eg creation of the House Committee on MDGs issuance of EO on the MDGs)
bull Prioritization of MDGs in resource allocation (eg focusing of MTPIP investments on MDGs)
bull Increasing awareness and participation of private sector LGUs in MDG-related programs
Hindering Factors
bull Resource constraints (ie MDG financing gap of about $15 billion yearly)
bull Lack of support by creditors for the Debt for MDG ProjectsDebt for Equity in MDG Projects initiative
bull Low budgetary priority for MDGs accorded by some LGUs and
bull Lack of disaggregated data to monitor MDGs at local levels
Parallel Initiatives
Participation in the High-Level Plenary Meeting on MDGs
Formulation of the Plan of Action for Poverty Reduction (2006-2010)Enhance the current Poverty Reduction
Strategy and Program Framework
Advocacy for the Philippine proposal on Debt for Equity in MDG Projects
Implications on the Philippine Economy
MDG attainment would requirebull Enhanced revenue generationbull LGU private sector and civil society supportbull Expansion of microfinance services for the poorbull Pursuit of projects with high economic impactbull Right-sizing the bureaucracybull Privatization andbull Tapping OFW remittances
Working towards achieving one Goal will make us closer to achievement of the rest amp would reduce costs of achieving othersrdquo Eveline Herfkens
SDC Res No 1 2003 ldquoExpanding
functions and composition of
MC-IHDCrdquo
DILG MC 2004-152 ldquoGuide to LGUs in the
Localization of the MDGsrdquo
MTPDP 2004-2010 hews
closely to the MDGs
Strong commitment
of the business
sector and civil society
Investment identification per goal and target in MTPIP
2005-2010
Strong support of
donor community
for the MDGs
Legislative support of Congress
Enabling Environment for the MDGs
Poverty Situation
FIGURE 1 Poverty Incidence of Population by Region 2003
Legend
Below national average (73 - 304)Above national average(305 - 542)
Source
NSO Family Income and Expenditures Survey 2003
ARMM 531
Cordillera Region 312
Metro Manila 73
Ilocos Region 302
Cagayan Valley 245
Central Luzon 177
CALABARZON 188
MIMAROPA 479
Bicol Region 484
Western Visayas 391
Central Visayas 284
Eastern Visayas 433
Western Mindanao 494
Northern Mindanao 443
Southern Mindanao 344
Central Mindanao 384
CARAGA 542
Annual Per Capita Poverty Threshold Poverty Incidence of Families and Population by Region 2000 and 2003
2000 Revised 2003 2000 Revised 2003 2000 Revised 2003Philippines 11 451 12 267 275 247 330 304NCR 15 693 16 796 57 50 76 73CAR 13 066 13 976 307 248 376 312Region I 12 685 13 276 294 244 351 302Region II 11 128 11 409 252 193 304 245Region III 13 760 14 342 173 137 214 177Region IV-A 13 657 14 616 152 149 191 188Region IV-B 11 995 12 406 363 397 452 479Region V 11 372 12 354 453 405 526 484Region VI 11 313 12 275 366 313 444 391Region VII 9 656 9 779 315 237 362 284Region VIII 9 518 10 802 375 355 451 433Region IX 9 116 10 414 385 441 448 494Region X 10 503 11 609 379 379 438 443Region XI 10 264 11 276 277 281 331 344Region XII 10 466 11 303 407 320 468 384Caraga 10 896 12 000 437 473 509 542ARMM 12 192 12 739 537 457 598 531
Poverty Incidenceof Population ()Region
Annual Per Capita PovertyThreshold (in Pesos)
Poverty Incidenceof Families ()
FIGURE 2 Subsistence Incidence of Population by Region 2003
Legend
Below national average Above national average
Source
NSO_Family and Income Expenditure Study 2003
ARMM 241
Cordillera Region 134
Metro Manila 06
Ilocos Region 112
Cagayan Valley 76
Central Luzon 42
CALABARZON 49
MIMAROPA 229
Bicol Region 266
Western Visayas 177
Central Visayas 146
Eastern Visayas 21
Western Mindanao 328
Northern Mindanao 254
Southern Mindanao 176
Central Mindanao 184
CARAGA 31
Annual Per Capita Food Threshold Subsistence Incidence of Families and Population by Region 2000 and 2003
2000 Revised 2003 2000 Revised 2003 2000 Revised 2003Philippines 7 707 8 134 123 104 158 138NCR 9 570 9 974 07 04 10 06CAR 8 744 9 117 137 98 179 134Region I 8 552 8 903 114 81 152 112Region II 7 560 8 026 93 56 118 76Region III 8 764 9 338 42 29 55 42Region IV-A 8 782 9 189 51 37 65 49Region IV-B 8 078 8 339 174 177 241 229Region V 8 047 8 372 233 203 293 266Region VI 7 983 8 386 174 129 231 177Region VII 6 759 7 016 169 112 207 146Region VIII 7 080 7 696 191 155 248 210Region IX 6 574 7 245 210 279 258 328Region X 7 296 7 999 192 197 238 254Region XI 7 087 7 751 128 135 167 176Region XII 7 235 7 804 179 140 226 184Caraga 7 667 8 353 244 245 307 310ARMM 8 313 8 737 239 186 285 241
RegionAnnual Per Capita Food Subsistence Incidence Subsistence Incidence
Threshold (in Pesos) of Families () of Population ()
FIGURE 3 Gini Concentration Ratios by Region 2003
Legend
Below National AverageAbove National Average
ARMM 03464
Cordillera Region 04294
Metro Manila 0413
Ilocos Region 03968
Cagayan Valley 04411
Central Luzon 03486
CALABARZON 04058
MIMAROPA 04354
Bicol Region 04648
Western Visayas 04392
Central Visayas 04711
Eastern Visayas 04577
Western Mindanao 05197
Northern Mindanao 04768
Southern Mindanao 04583
Central Mindanao 04567
CARAGA 04294
Gini Coefficient Among Families by Region 2000 and 2003
Region2000 2003 Change
Philippines 04822 04660 -16NCR 04451 04130 -32CAR 04439 04294 -15Region I 04071 03968 -10Region II 04227 04411 18Region III 03591 03486 -11Region IV-A 04086 04058 -03Region IV-B 04076 04354 28Region V 04455 04648 19Region VI 04594 04392 -20Region VII 04691 04711 02Region VIII 04807 04577 -23Region IX 04732 05197 47Region X 04794 04768 -03Region XI 04318 04567 25Region XII 04631 04583 -05Caraga 04118 04294 18ARMM 03171 03464 29
GINI
FIGURE 4 Percentage of Households with Less than 100 Energy Adequacy
FIGURE 5 Percentage of Underweight Children 0-5 Year Olds
Meeting Goal 1 Eradicate Extreme Poverty and Hunger
Priority Policies and Programs
bull Kapit-Bisig Laban sa Kahirapan (KALAHI)
bull Enrolment of 7 million beneficiaries under the National Health Insurance Program (NHIP)
bull Wholesale portfolio of the Peoplersquos Credit and Finance Corporation (PCFC)
bull Implementation of asset reform programs
bull Delivery of human development services
MDGs Amount
(in US$ million)
Share to Total MDG-
Related ODA
1 - Eradicate extreme poverty amp hunger 62594 7740
2 - Achieve universal primary education 5579 690
3 - Promote gender equality 38 005
4 - Reduce child mortality 1399 173
5 - Improve maternal health 1570 194
6 - Combat HIVAIDS malaria amp other diseases 253 031
7 - Ensure environmental sustainability 94331 1167
TOTAL 80866 10000
Summary of ODA for completed amp ongoing projects by MDG category from 2001-2005 in million US$
Source NEDA-PMS
ODA for MDGs
INVESTMENTS SUPPORTIVE OF THE MDGs 2005-2010
MDGs COST
(in PhP Billion)
1 - Eradicate extreme poverty amp hunger 129422 - Achieve universal primary education 5673 - Promote gender equality -4 - Reduce child mortality
6995 - Improve maternal health
6 - Combat HIVAIDS malaria amp other diseases
7 - Ensure environmental sustainability 19888 ndash Global partnership for development 1251
TOTAL 17447
Source NEDA-PIS
INTENSIFYING MULTISECTORAL PARTNERSHIP AND COLLABORATION
Government (executive legislature judicial)
Local Government
CSOsAcademe
Local Government
PrivateBusiness
Donor Community
Environmental Situationand Challenges
Goal 7 Ensure Environmental Sustainability
bull Forests resources and watersheds
bull Biodiversity resources
bull Coastal and marine resources
bull Air quality
bull Water resources
bull Waste and toxic chemicals
Area Proportion to Total
(Hectares) ()
7168400 100
2560872 36
Broadleaved 2448864
Mixed 24618
Coniferous 87390
4030588 56
Broadleaved 3847284
Mixed 69861
Coniferous 113443
247362 3
329578 5Source Forest Management Bureau (FMB)
Total Forest
Mangrove
Plantation
Forest Cover by Forest Type 2003
Closed Forest
Open Forest
Category
Area Reforested 1990-2003 (in hectares)Year Total
Government
Percent Non-Government
Percent
Sector
2003 15087 13195 875 1892 125
2002 25620 20682 807 4938 193
2001 31440 26524 844 4916 156
2000 27632 21740 787 5892 213
1999 42165 31183 74 10982 26
1998 42368 33219 784 9149 216
1997 66236 49301 744 16935 256
1996 46096 18869 409 27227 591
1995 65233 21841 335 43392 665
1994 49551 18032 364 31519 636
1993 19211 6347 33 12864 67
1992 40593 24304 599 16289 401
1991 93039 73602 791 19437 209
1990 191663 153949 803 37714 197
Annual Average
53995
Source DENR Annual Report
Biodiversity Resources
Philippineshellip one of the megadiverse countries in the
world higher regard for the endemism of local
species
buthellip most severely threatened of the
megadiverse countries
Coastal and Marine Resources rich sources of fish and aquatic products habitat for countless underwater wildlife natural areas for recreationtourism Water resourcesbull disparities in water supply coverage across regionsbull depletion of ground water especially in Metro
Manila and Metro Cebubull pollution of water sources
Air Qualitybull pollution remains a problem in Metro Manila and
major urban centersbull on the level of suspended particulates (TSP) air
quality is not within standards
Waste and Toxic Chemicalsbull solid waste generation in Metro Manila is estimated at
5345 tons per daybull urbanization inevitably increased the use of chemicalsbull no integrated treatment facility for hazardous waste
Priority Policies and Programs
bull Adoption of Sustainable Forest Management
bull Revised Forestry Code of the Philippines and the Watersheds Code
bull Various biodiversity acts
bull Fisheries Code and AFMA
bull Clean Air Act
Challenges and Priorities for Action
bull Sustainable and more productive utilization of natural resources
bull Focus and strengthen the protection of vulnerable and ecologically fragile areas
bull Create healthier environment for the populationbull Mitigate the occurrence of natural disasters bull Ensure environmental accountability for all
industries
CROSS-CUTTING CHALLENGEShellip
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005
Government Expenditure Program by Sector FY 2000-2005
Social Services Debt Service Economic Services General Public Services Defense
CROSSCUTTING CHALLENGES AND PRIORITIES FOR ACTION
Source DBM Budget of Expenditure and Sources of Financing
FINANCING THE MDGs
SectorYear 2001 2002 2003 2004
Economic Services 15982070 45484830 52853500 58700890
(15) (32) (33) (34)Social Services 28979110 26352690 34001700 36135990
(27) (19) (21) (21)General Public Services 63375820 69580140 73954470 78545740
(58) (49) (46) (45)Total Public Expenditures 108337000 141417660 160809670 173382620
FINANCING THE MDGs
Distribution of Public Expenditures by Local Government UnitsBy Sector 2001-2004 (in thousand pesos)
Source DBM Budget of Expenditure and Sources of Financing
CROSSCUTTING CHALLENGES AND PRIORITIES FOR ACTION
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
2001 2002 2003 2004
ODA Commitments by SectorFY 2001-2004 (US$ million)
Agriculture agrarianreform and naturalresources
Governance andinstitutionsdevelopment
Infrastructuredevelopment
Social reform anddevelopment
Industry and services
Source NEDA-PIS
CROSSCUTTING CHALLENGES AND PRIORITIES FOR ACTION
FINANCING THE MDGs
CROSS-CUTTING CHALLENGES AND
PRIORITIES FOR ACTIONbull Reduce disparities across regions
bull Increase resource allocation for MDG-related programs and projects
bull Enforce fullstricter implementation of laws amp ensure passage of MDG-supportive bills
bull Strengthen monitoring and implementation
bull Scale-up campaign for localization
bull Develop an advocacy plan
bull Intensify multisectoral partnership amp collaboration
Facilitating Factors bull Strong global support for MDGs by the United
Nations ASEAN and other multilateral organizations
bull Expanding national support among policymakers for MDGs (eg creation of the House Committee on MDGs issuance of EO on the MDGs)
bull Prioritization of MDGs in resource allocation (eg focusing of MTPIP investments on MDGs)
bull Increasing awareness and participation of private sector LGUs in MDG-related programs
Hindering Factors
bull Resource constraints (ie MDG financing gap of about $15 billion yearly)
bull Lack of support by creditors for the Debt for MDG ProjectsDebt for Equity in MDG Projects initiative
bull Low budgetary priority for MDGs accorded by some LGUs and
bull Lack of disaggregated data to monitor MDGs at local levels
Parallel Initiatives
Participation in the High-Level Plenary Meeting on MDGs
Formulation of the Plan of Action for Poverty Reduction (2006-2010)Enhance the current Poverty Reduction
Strategy and Program Framework
Advocacy for the Philippine proposal on Debt for Equity in MDG Projects
Implications on the Philippine Economy
MDG attainment would requirebull Enhanced revenue generationbull LGU private sector and civil society supportbull Expansion of microfinance services for the poorbull Pursuit of projects with high economic impactbull Right-sizing the bureaucracybull Privatization andbull Tapping OFW remittances
SDC Res No 1 2003 ldquoExpanding
functions and composition of
MC-IHDCrdquo
DILG MC 2004-152 ldquoGuide to LGUs in the
Localization of the MDGsrdquo
MTPDP 2004-2010 hews
closely to the MDGs
Strong commitment
of the business
sector and civil society
Investment identification per goal and target in MTPIP
2005-2010
Strong support of
donor community
for the MDGs
Legislative support of Congress
Enabling Environment for the MDGs
Poverty Situation
FIGURE 1 Poverty Incidence of Population by Region 2003
Legend
Below national average (73 - 304)Above national average(305 - 542)
Source
NSO Family Income and Expenditures Survey 2003
ARMM 531
Cordillera Region 312
Metro Manila 73
Ilocos Region 302
Cagayan Valley 245
Central Luzon 177
CALABARZON 188
MIMAROPA 479
Bicol Region 484
Western Visayas 391
Central Visayas 284
Eastern Visayas 433
Western Mindanao 494
Northern Mindanao 443
Southern Mindanao 344
Central Mindanao 384
CARAGA 542
Annual Per Capita Poverty Threshold Poverty Incidence of Families and Population by Region 2000 and 2003
2000 Revised 2003 2000 Revised 2003 2000 Revised 2003Philippines 11 451 12 267 275 247 330 304NCR 15 693 16 796 57 50 76 73CAR 13 066 13 976 307 248 376 312Region I 12 685 13 276 294 244 351 302Region II 11 128 11 409 252 193 304 245Region III 13 760 14 342 173 137 214 177Region IV-A 13 657 14 616 152 149 191 188Region IV-B 11 995 12 406 363 397 452 479Region V 11 372 12 354 453 405 526 484Region VI 11 313 12 275 366 313 444 391Region VII 9 656 9 779 315 237 362 284Region VIII 9 518 10 802 375 355 451 433Region IX 9 116 10 414 385 441 448 494Region X 10 503 11 609 379 379 438 443Region XI 10 264 11 276 277 281 331 344Region XII 10 466 11 303 407 320 468 384Caraga 10 896 12 000 437 473 509 542ARMM 12 192 12 739 537 457 598 531
Poverty Incidenceof Population ()Region
Annual Per Capita PovertyThreshold (in Pesos)
Poverty Incidenceof Families ()
FIGURE 2 Subsistence Incidence of Population by Region 2003
Legend
Below national average Above national average
Source
NSO_Family and Income Expenditure Study 2003
ARMM 241
Cordillera Region 134
Metro Manila 06
Ilocos Region 112
Cagayan Valley 76
Central Luzon 42
CALABARZON 49
MIMAROPA 229
Bicol Region 266
Western Visayas 177
Central Visayas 146
Eastern Visayas 21
Western Mindanao 328
Northern Mindanao 254
Southern Mindanao 176
Central Mindanao 184
CARAGA 31
Annual Per Capita Food Threshold Subsistence Incidence of Families and Population by Region 2000 and 2003
2000 Revised 2003 2000 Revised 2003 2000 Revised 2003Philippines 7 707 8 134 123 104 158 138NCR 9 570 9 974 07 04 10 06CAR 8 744 9 117 137 98 179 134Region I 8 552 8 903 114 81 152 112Region II 7 560 8 026 93 56 118 76Region III 8 764 9 338 42 29 55 42Region IV-A 8 782 9 189 51 37 65 49Region IV-B 8 078 8 339 174 177 241 229Region V 8 047 8 372 233 203 293 266Region VI 7 983 8 386 174 129 231 177Region VII 6 759 7 016 169 112 207 146Region VIII 7 080 7 696 191 155 248 210Region IX 6 574 7 245 210 279 258 328Region X 7 296 7 999 192 197 238 254Region XI 7 087 7 751 128 135 167 176Region XII 7 235 7 804 179 140 226 184Caraga 7 667 8 353 244 245 307 310ARMM 8 313 8 737 239 186 285 241
RegionAnnual Per Capita Food Subsistence Incidence Subsistence Incidence
Threshold (in Pesos) of Families () of Population ()
FIGURE 3 Gini Concentration Ratios by Region 2003
Legend
Below National AverageAbove National Average
ARMM 03464
Cordillera Region 04294
Metro Manila 0413
Ilocos Region 03968
Cagayan Valley 04411
Central Luzon 03486
CALABARZON 04058
MIMAROPA 04354
Bicol Region 04648
Western Visayas 04392
Central Visayas 04711
Eastern Visayas 04577
Western Mindanao 05197
Northern Mindanao 04768
Southern Mindanao 04583
Central Mindanao 04567
CARAGA 04294
Gini Coefficient Among Families by Region 2000 and 2003
Region2000 2003 Change
Philippines 04822 04660 -16NCR 04451 04130 -32CAR 04439 04294 -15Region I 04071 03968 -10Region II 04227 04411 18Region III 03591 03486 -11Region IV-A 04086 04058 -03Region IV-B 04076 04354 28Region V 04455 04648 19Region VI 04594 04392 -20Region VII 04691 04711 02Region VIII 04807 04577 -23Region IX 04732 05197 47Region X 04794 04768 -03Region XI 04318 04567 25Region XII 04631 04583 -05Caraga 04118 04294 18ARMM 03171 03464 29
GINI
FIGURE 4 Percentage of Households with Less than 100 Energy Adequacy
FIGURE 5 Percentage of Underweight Children 0-5 Year Olds
Meeting Goal 1 Eradicate Extreme Poverty and Hunger
Priority Policies and Programs
bull Kapit-Bisig Laban sa Kahirapan (KALAHI)
bull Enrolment of 7 million beneficiaries under the National Health Insurance Program (NHIP)
bull Wholesale portfolio of the Peoplersquos Credit and Finance Corporation (PCFC)
bull Implementation of asset reform programs
bull Delivery of human development services
MDGs Amount
(in US$ million)
Share to Total MDG-
Related ODA
1 - Eradicate extreme poverty amp hunger 62594 7740
2 - Achieve universal primary education 5579 690
3 - Promote gender equality 38 005
4 - Reduce child mortality 1399 173
5 - Improve maternal health 1570 194
6 - Combat HIVAIDS malaria amp other diseases 253 031
7 - Ensure environmental sustainability 94331 1167
TOTAL 80866 10000
Summary of ODA for completed amp ongoing projects by MDG category from 2001-2005 in million US$
Source NEDA-PMS
ODA for MDGs
INVESTMENTS SUPPORTIVE OF THE MDGs 2005-2010
MDGs COST
(in PhP Billion)
1 - Eradicate extreme poverty amp hunger 129422 - Achieve universal primary education 5673 - Promote gender equality -4 - Reduce child mortality
6995 - Improve maternal health
6 - Combat HIVAIDS malaria amp other diseases
7 - Ensure environmental sustainability 19888 ndash Global partnership for development 1251
TOTAL 17447
Source NEDA-PIS
INTENSIFYING MULTISECTORAL PARTNERSHIP AND COLLABORATION
Government (executive legislature judicial)
Local Government
CSOsAcademe
Local Government
PrivateBusiness
Donor Community
Environmental Situationand Challenges
Goal 7 Ensure Environmental Sustainability
bull Forests resources and watersheds
bull Biodiversity resources
bull Coastal and marine resources
bull Air quality
bull Water resources
bull Waste and toxic chemicals
Area Proportion to Total
(Hectares) ()
7168400 100
2560872 36
Broadleaved 2448864
Mixed 24618
Coniferous 87390
4030588 56
Broadleaved 3847284
Mixed 69861
Coniferous 113443
247362 3
329578 5Source Forest Management Bureau (FMB)
Total Forest
Mangrove
Plantation
Forest Cover by Forest Type 2003
Closed Forest
Open Forest
Category
Area Reforested 1990-2003 (in hectares)Year Total
Government
Percent Non-Government
Percent
Sector
2003 15087 13195 875 1892 125
2002 25620 20682 807 4938 193
2001 31440 26524 844 4916 156
2000 27632 21740 787 5892 213
1999 42165 31183 74 10982 26
1998 42368 33219 784 9149 216
1997 66236 49301 744 16935 256
1996 46096 18869 409 27227 591
1995 65233 21841 335 43392 665
1994 49551 18032 364 31519 636
1993 19211 6347 33 12864 67
1992 40593 24304 599 16289 401
1991 93039 73602 791 19437 209
1990 191663 153949 803 37714 197
Annual Average
53995
Source DENR Annual Report
Biodiversity Resources
Philippineshellip one of the megadiverse countries in the
world higher regard for the endemism of local
species
buthellip most severely threatened of the
megadiverse countries
Coastal and Marine Resources rich sources of fish and aquatic products habitat for countless underwater wildlife natural areas for recreationtourism Water resourcesbull disparities in water supply coverage across regionsbull depletion of ground water especially in Metro
Manila and Metro Cebubull pollution of water sources
Air Qualitybull pollution remains a problem in Metro Manila and
major urban centersbull on the level of suspended particulates (TSP) air
quality is not within standards
Waste and Toxic Chemicalsbull solid waste generation in Metro Manila is estimated at
5345 tons per daybull urbanization inevitably increased the use of chemicalsbull no integrated treatment facility for hazardous waste
Priority Policies and Programs
bull Adoption of Sustainable Forest Management
bull Revised Forestry Code of the Philippines and the Watersheds Code
bull Various biodiversity acts
bull Fisheries Code and AFMA
bull Clean Air Act
Challenges and Priorities for Action
bull Sustainable and more productive utilization of natural resources
bull Focus and strengthen the protection of vulnerable and ecologically fragile areas
bull Create healthier environment for the populationbull Mitigate the occurrence of natural disasters bull Ensure environmental accountability for all
industries
CROSS-CUTTING CHALLENGEShellip
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005
Government Expenditure Program by Sector FY 2000-2005
Social Services Debt Service Economic Services General Public Services Defense
CROSSCUTTING CHALLENGES AND PRIORITIES FOR ACTION
Source DBM Budget of Expenditure and Sources of Financing
FINANCING THE MDGs
SectorYear 2001 2002 2003 2004
Economic Services 15982070 45484830 52853500 58700890
(15) (32) (33) (34)Social Services 28979110 26352690 34001700 36135990
(27) (19) (21) (21)General Public Services 63375820 69580140 73954470 78545740
(58) (49) (46) (45)Total Public Expenditures 108337000 141417660 160809670 173382620
FINANCING THE MDGs
Distribution of Public Expenditures by Local Government UnitsBy Sector 2001-2004 (in thousand pesos)
Source DBM Budget of Expenditure and Sources of Financing
CROSSCUTTING CHALLENGES AND PRIORITIES FOR ACTION
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
2001 2002 2003 2004
ODA Commitments by SectorFY 2001-2004 (US$ million)
Agriculture agrarianreform and naturalresources
Governance andinstitutionsdevelopment
Infrastructuredevelopment
Social reform anddevelopment
Industry and services
Source NEDA-PIS
CROSSCUTTING CHALLENGES AND PRIORITIES FOR ACTION
FINANCING THE MDGs
CROSS-CUTTING CHALLENGES AND
PRIORITIES FOR ACTIONbull Reduce disparities across regions
bull Increase resource allocation for MDG-related programs and projects
bull Enforce fullstricter implementation of laws amp ensure passage of MDG-supportive bills
bull Strengthen monitoring and implementation
bull Scale-up campaign for localization
bull Develop an advocacy plan
bull Intensify multisectoral partnership amp collaboration
Facilitating Factors bull Strong global support for MDGs by the United
Nations ASEAN and other multilateral organizations
bull Expanding national support among policymakers for MDGs (eg creation of the House Committee on MDGs issuance of EO on the MDGs)
bull Prioritization of MDGs in resource allocation (eg focusing of MTPIP investments on MDGs)
bull Increasing awareness and participation of private sector LGUs in MDG-related programs
Hindering Factors
bull Resource constraints (ie MDG financing gap of about $15 billion yearly)
bull Lack of support by creditors for the Debt for MDG ProjectsDebt for Equity in MDG Projects initiative
bull Low budgetary priority for MDGs accorded by some LGUs and
bull Lack of disaggregated data to monitor MDGs at local levels
Parallel Initiatives
Participation in the High-Level Plenary Meeting on MDGs
Formulation of the Plan of Action for Poverty Reduction (2006-2010)Enhance the current Poverty Reduction
Strategy and Program Framework
Advocacy for the Philippine proposal on Debt for Equity in MDG Projects
Implications on the Philippine Economy
MDG attainment would requirebull Enhanced revenue generationbull LGU private sector and civil society supportbull Expansion of microfinance services for the poorbull Pursuit of projects with high economic impactbull Right-sizing the bureaucracybull Privatization andbull Tapping OFW remittances
Poverty Situation
FIGURE 1 Poverty Incidence of Population by Region 2003
Legend
Below national average (73 - 304)Above national average(305 - 542)
Source
NSO Family Income and Expenditures Survey 2003
ARMM 531
Cordillera Region 312
Metro Manila 73
Ilocos Region 302
Cagayan Valley 245
Central Luzon 177
CALABARZON 188
MIMAROPA 479
Bicol Region 484
Western Visayas 391
Central Visayas 284
Eastern Visayas 433
Western Mindanao 494
Northern Mindanao 443
Southern Mindanao 344
Central Mindanao 384
CARAGA 542
Annual Per Capita Poverty Threshold Poverty Incidence of Families and Population by Region 2000 and 2003
2000 Revised 2003 2000 Revised 2003 2000 Revised 2003Philippines 11 451 12 267 275 247 330 304NCR 15 693 16 796 57 50 76 73CAR 13 066 13 976 307 248 376 312Region I 12 685 13 276 294 244 351 302Region II 11 128 11 409 252 193 304 245Region III 13 760 14 342 173 137 214 177Region IV-A 13 657 14 616 152 149 191 188Region IV-B 11 995 12 406 363 397 452 479Region V 11 372 12 354 453 405 526 484Region VI 11 313 12 275 366 313 444 391Region VII 9 656 9 779 315 237 362 284Region VIII 9 518 10 802 375 355 451 433Region IX 9 116 10 414 385 441 448 494Region X 10 503 11 609 379 379 438 443Region XI 10 264 11 276 277 281 331 344Region XII 10 466 11 303 407 320 468 384Caraga 10 896 12 000 437 473 509 542ARMM 12 192 12 739 537 457 598 531
Poverty Incidenceof Population ()Region
Annual Per Capita PovertyThreshold (in Pesos)
Poverty Incidenceof Families ()
FIGURE 2 Subsistence Incidence of Population by Region 2003
Legend
Below national average Above national average
Source
NSO_Family and Income Expenditure Study 2003
ARMM 241
Cordillera Region 134
Metro Manila 06
Ilocos Region 112
Cagayan Valley 76
Central Luzon 42
CALABARZON 49
MIMAROPA 229
Bicol Region 266
Western Visayas 177
Central Visayas 146
Eastern Visayas 21
Western Mindanao 328
Northern Mindanao 254
Southern Mindanao 176
Central Mindanao 184
CARAGA 31
Annual Per Capita Food Threshold Subsistence Incidence of Families and Population by Region 2000 and 2003
2000 Revised 2003 2000 Revised 2003 2000 Revised 2003Philippines 7 707 8 134 123 104 158 138NCR 9 570 9 974 07 04 10 06CAR 8 744 9 117 137 98 179 134Region I 8 552 8 903 114 81 152 112Region II 7 560 8 026 93 56 118 76Region III 8 764 9 338 42 29 55 42Region IV-A 8 782 9 189 51 37 65 49Region IV-B 8 078 8 339 174 177 241 229Region V 8 047 8 372 233 203 293 266Region VI 7 983 8 386 174 129 231 177Region VII 6 759 7 016 169 112 207 146Region VIII 7 080 7 696 191 155 248 210Region IX 6 574 7 245 210 279 258 328Region X 7 296 7 999 192 197 238 254Region XI 7 087 7 751 128 135 167 176Region XII 7 235 7 804 179 140 226 184Caraga 7 667 8 353 244 245 307 310ARMM 8 313 8 737 239 186 285 241
RegionAnnual Per Capita Food Subsistence Incidence Subsistence Incidence
Threshold (in Pesos) of Families () of Population ()
FIGURE 3 Gini Concentration Ratios by Region 2003
Legend
Below National AverageAbove National Average
ARMM 03464
Cordillera Region 04294
Metro Manila 0413
Ilocos Region 03968
Cagayan Valley 04411
Central Luzon 03486
CALABARZON 04058
MIMAROPA 04354
Bicol Region 04648
Western Visayas 04392
Central Visayas 04711
Eastern Visayas 04577
Western Mindanao 05197
Northern Mindanao 04768
Southern Mindanao 04583
Central Mindanao 04567
CARAGA 04294
Gini Coefficient Among Families by Region 2000 and 2003
Region2000 2003 Change
Philippines 04822 04660 -16NCR 04451 04130 -32CAR 04439 04294 -15Region I 04071 03968 -10Region II 04227 04411 18Region III 03591 03486 -11Region IV-A 04086 04058 -03Region IV-B 04076 04354 28Region V 04455 04648 19Region VI 04594 04392 -20Region VII 04691 04711 02Region VIII 04807 04577 -23Region IX 04732 05197 47Region X 04794 04768 -03Region XI 04318 04567 25Region XII 04631 04583 -05Caraga 04118 04294 18ARMM 03171 03464 29
GINI
FIGURE 4 Percentage of Households with Less than 100 Energy Adequacy
FIGURE 5 Percentage of Underweight Children 0-5 Year Olds
Meeting Goal 1 Eradicate Extreme Poverty and Hunger
Priority Policies and Programs
bull Kapit-Bisig Laban sa Kahirapan (KALAHI)
bull Enrolment of 7 million beneficiaries under the National Health Insurance Program (NHIP)
bull Wholesale portfolio of the Peoplersquos Credit and Finance Corporation (PCFC)
bull Implementation of asset reform programs
bull Delivery of human development services
MDGs Amount
(in US$ million)
Share to Total MDG-
Related ODA
1 - Eradicate extreme poverty amp hunger 62594 7740
2 - Achieve universal primary education 5579 690
3 - Promote gender equality 38 005
4 - Reduce child mortality 1399 173
5 - Improve maternal health 1570 194
6 - Combat HIVAIDS malaria amp other diseases 253 031
7 - Ensure environmental sustainability 94331 1167
TOTAL 80866 10000
Summary of ODA for completed amp ongoing projects by MDG category from 2001-2005 in million US$
Source NEDA-PMS
ODA for MDGs
INVESTMENTS SUPPORTIVE OF THE MDGs 2005-2010
MDGs COST
(in PhP Billion)
1 - Eradicate extreme poverty amp hunger 129422 - Achieve universal primary education 5673 - Promote gender equality -4 - Reduce child mortality
6995 - Improve maternal health
6 - Combat HIVAIDS malaria amp other diseases
7 - Ensure environmental sustainability 19888 ndash Global partnership for development 1251
TOTAL 17447
Source NEDA-PIS
INTENSIFYING MULTISECTORAL PARTNERSHIP AND COLLABORATION
Government (executive legislature judicial)
Local Government
CSOsAcademe
Local Government
PrivateBusiness
Donor Community
Environmental Situationand Challenges
Goal 7 Ensure Environmental Sustainability
bull Forests resources and watersheds
bull Biodiversity resources
bull Coastal and marine resources
bull Air quality
bull Water resources
bull Waste and toxic chemicals
Area Proportion to Total
(Hectares) ()
7168400 100
2560872 36
Broadleaved 2448864
Mixed 24618
Coniferous 87390
4030588 56
Broadleaved 3847284
Mixed 69861
Coniferous 113443
247362 3
329578 5Source Forest Management Bureau (FMB)
Total Forest
Mangrove
Plantation
Forest Cover by Forest Type 2003
Closed Forest
Open Forest
Category
Area Reforested 1990-2003 (in hectares)Year Total
Government
Percent Non-Government
Percent
Sector
2003 15087 13195 875 1892 125
2002 25620 20682 807 4938 193
2001 31440 26524 844 4916 156
2000 27632 21740 787 5892 213
1999 42165 31183 74 10982 26
1998 42368 33219 784 9149 216
1997 66236 49301 744 16935 256
1996 46096 18869 409 27227 591
1995 65233 21841 335 43392 665
1994 49551 18032 364 31519 636
1993 19211 6347 33 12864 67
1992 40593 24304 599 16289 401
1991 93039 73602 791 19437 209
1990 191663 153949 803 37714 197
Annual Average
53995
Source DENR Annual Report
Biodiversity Resources
Philippineshellip one of the megadiverse countries in the
world higher regard for the endemism of local
species
buthellip most severely threatened of the
megadiverse countries
Coastal and Marine Resources rich sources of fish and aquatic products habitat for countless underwater wildlife natural areas for recreationtourism Water resourcesbull disparities in water supply coverage across regionsbull depletion of ground water especially in Metro
Manila and Metro Cebubull pollution of water sources
Air Qualitybull pollution remains a problem in Metro Manila and
major urban centersbull on the level of suspended particulates (TSP) air
quality is not within standards
Waste and Toxic Chemicalsbull solid waste generation in Metro Manila is estimated at
5345 tons per daybull urbanization inevitably increased the use of chemicalsbull no integrated treatment facility for hazardous waste
Priority Policies and Programs
bull Adoption of Sustainable Forest Management
bull Revised Forestry Code of the Philippines and the Watersheds Code
bull Various biodiversity acts
bull Fisheries Code and AFMA
bull Clean Air Act
Challenges and Priorities for Action
bull Sustainable and more productive utilization of natural resources
bull Focus and strengthen the protection of vulnerable and ecologically fragile areas
bull Create healthier environment for the populationbull Mitigate the occurrence of natural disasters bull Ensure environmental accountability for all
industries
CROSS-CUTTING CHALLENGEShellip
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005
Government Expenditure Program by Sector FY 2000-2005
Social Services Debt Service Economic Services General Public Services Defense
CROSSCUTTING CHALLENGES AND PRIORITIES FOR ACTION
Source DBM Budget of Expenditure and Sources of Financing
FINANCING THE MDGs
SectorYear 2001 2002 2003 2004
Economic Services 15982070 45484830 52853500 58700890
(15) (32) (33) (34)Social Services 28979110 26352690 34001700 36135990
(27) (19) (21) (21)General Public Services 63375820 69580140 73954470 78545740
(58) (49) (46) (45)Total Public Expenditures 108337000 141417660 160809670 173382620
FINANCING THE MDGs
Distribution of Public Expenditures by Local Government UnitsBy Sector 2001-2004 (in thousand pesos)
Source DBM Budget of Expenditure and Sources of Financing
CROSSCUTTING CHALLENGES AND PRIORITIES FOR ACTION
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
2001 2002 2003 2004
ODA Commitments by SectorFY 2001-2004 (US$ million)
Agriculture agrarianreform and naturalresources
Governance andinstitutionsdevelopment
Infrastructuredevelopment
Social reform anddevelopment
Industry and services
Source NEDA-PIS
CROSSCUTTING CHALLENGES AND PRIORITIES FOR ACTION
FINANCING THE MDGs
CROSS-CUTTING CHALLENGES AND
PRIORITIES FOR ACTIONbull Reduce disparities across regions
bull Increase resource allocation for MDG-related programs and projects
bull Enforce fullstricter implementation of laws amp ensure passage of MDG-supportive bills
bull Strengthen monitoring and implementation
bull Scale-up campaign for localization
bull Develop an advocacy plan
bull Intensify multisectoral partnership amp collaboration
Facilitating Factors bull Strong global support for MDGs by the United
Nations ASEAN and other multilateral organizations
bull Expanding national support among policymakers for MDGs (eg creation of the House Committee on MDGs issuance of EO on the MDGs)
bull Prioritization of MDGs in resource allocation (eg focusing of MTPIP investments on MDGs)
bull Increasing awareness and participation of private sector LGUs in MDG-related programs
Hindering Factors
bull Resource constraints (ie MDG financing gap of about $15 billion yearly)
bull Lack of support by creditors for the Debt for MDG ProjectsDebt for Equity in MDG Projects initiative
bull Low budgetary priority for MDGs accorded by some LGUs and
bull Lack of disaggregated data to monitor MDGs at local levels
Parallel Initiatives
Participation in the High-Level Plenary Meeting on MDGs
Formulation of the Plan of Action for Poverty Reduction (2006-2010)Enhance the current Poverty Reduction
Strategy and Program Framework
Advocacy for the Philippine proposal on Debt for Equity in MDG Projects
Implications on the Philippine Economy
MDG attainment would requirebull Enhanced revenue generationbull LGU private sector and civil society supportbull Expansion of microfinance services for the poorbull Pursuit of projects with high economic impactbull Right-sizing the bureaucracybull Privatization andbull Tapping OFW remittances
FIGURE 1 Poverty Incidence of Population by Region 2003
Legend
Below national average (73 - 304)Above national average(305 - 542)
Source
NSO Family Income and Expenditures Survey 2003
ARMM 531
Cordillera Region 312
Metro Manila 73
Ilocos Region 302
Cagayan Valley 245
Central Luzon 177
CALABARZON 188
MIMAROPA 479
Bicol Region 484
Western Visayas 391
Central Visayas 284
Eastern Visayas 433
Western Mindanao 494
Northern Mindanao 443
Southern Mindanao 344
Central Mindanao 384
CARAGA 542
Annual Per Capita Poverty Threshold Poverty Incidence of Families and Population by Region 2000 and 2003
2000 Revised 2003 2000 Revised 2003 2000 Revised 2003Philippines 11 451 12 267 275 247 330 304NCR 15 693 16 796 57 50 76 73CAR 13 066 13 976 307 248 376 312Region I 12 685 13 276 294 244 351 302Region II 11 128 11 409 252 193 304 245Region III 13 760 14 342 173 137 214 177Region IV-A 13 657 14 616 152 149 191 188Region IV-B 11 995 12 406 363 397 452 479Region V 11 372 12 354 453 405 526 484Region VI 11 313 12 275 366 313 444 391Region VII 9 656 9 779 315 237 362 284Region VIII 9 518 10 802 375 355 451 433Region IX 9 116 10 414 385 441 448 494Region X 10 503 11 609 379 379 438 443Region XI 10 264 11 276 277 281 331 344Region XII 10 466 11 303 407 320 468 384Caraga 10 896 12 000 437 473 509 542ARMM 12 192 12 739 537 457 598 531
Poverty Incidenceof Population ()Region
Annual Per Capita PovertyThreshold (in Pesos)
Poverty Incidenceof Families ()
FIGURE 2 Subsistence Incidence of Population by Region 2003
Legend
Below national average Above national average
Source
NSO_Family and Income Expenditure Study 2003
ARMM 241
Cordillera Region 134
Metro Manila 06
Ilocos Region 112
Cagayan Valley 76
Central Luzon 42
CALABARZON 49
MIMAROPA 229
Bicol Region 266
Western Visayas 177
Central Visayas 146
Eastern Visayas 21
Western Mindanao 328
Northern Mindanao 254
Southern Mindanao 176
Central Mindanao 184
CARAGA 31
Annual Per Capita Food Threshold Subsistence Incidence of Families and Population by Region 2000 and 2003
2000 Revised 2003 2000 Revised 2003 2000 Revised 2003Philippines 7 707 8 134 123 104 158 138NCR 9 570 9 974 07 04 10 06CAR 8 744 9 117 137 98 179 134Region I 8 552 8 903 114 81 152 112Region II 7 560 8 026 93 56 118 76Region III 8 764 9 338 42 29 55 42Region IV-A 8 782 9 189 51 37 65 49Region IV-B 8 078 8 339 174 177 241 229Region V 8 047 8 372 233 203 293 266Region VI 7 983 8 386 174 129 231 177Region VII 6 759 7 016 169 112 207 146Region VIII 7 080 7 696 191 155 248 210Region IX 6 574 7 245 210 279 258 328Region X 7 296 7 999 192 197 238 254Region XI 7 087 7 751 128 135 167 176Region XII 7 235 7 804 179 140 226 184Caraga 7 667 8 353 244 245 307 310ARMM 8 313 8 737 239 186 285 241
RegionAnnual Per Capita Food Subsistence Incidence Subsistence Incidence
Threshold (in Pesos) of Families () of Population ()
FIGURE 3 Gini Concentration Ratios by Region 2003
Legend
Below National AverageAbove National Average
ARMM 03464
Cordillera Region 04294
Metro Manila 0413
Ilocos Region 03968
Cagayan Valley 04411
Central Luzon 03486
CALABARZON 04058
MIMAROPA 04354
Bicol Region 04648
Western Visayas 04392
Central Visayas 04711
Eastern Visayas 04577
Western Mindanao 05197
Northern Mindanao 04768
Southern Mindanao 04583
Central Mindanao 04567
CARAGA 04294
Gini Coefficient Among Families by Region 2000 and 2003
Region2000 2003 Change
Philippines 04822 04660 -16NCR 04451 04130 -32CAR 04439 04294 -15Region I 04071 03968 -10Region II 04227 04411 18Region III 03591 03486 -11Region IV-A 04086 04058 -03Region IV-B 04076 04354 28Region V 04455 04648 19Region VI 04594 04392 -20Region VII 04691 04711 02Region VIII 04807 04577 -23Region IX 04732 05197 47Region X 04794 04768 -03Region XI 04318 04567 25Region XII 04631 04583 -05Caraga 04118 04294 18ARMM 03171 03464 29
GINI
FIGURE 4 Percentage of Households with Less than 100 Energy Adequacy
FIGURE 5 Percentage of Underweight Children 0-5 Year Olds
Meeting Goal 1 Eradicate Extreme Poverty and Hunger
Priority Policies and Programs
bull Kapit-Bisig Laban sa Kahirapan (KALAHI)
bull Enrolment of 7 million beneficiaries under the National Health Insurance Program (NHIP)
bull Wholesale portfolio of the Peoplersquos Credit and Finance Corporation (PCFC)
bull Implementation of asset reform programs
bull Delivery of human development services
MDGs Amount
(in US$ million)
Share to Total MDG-
Related ODA
1 - Eradicate extreme poverty amp hunger 62594 7740
2 - Achieve universal primary education 5579 690
3 - Promote gender equality 38 005
4 - Reduce child mortality 1399 173
5 - Improve maternal health 1570 194
6 - Combat HIVAIDS malaria amp other diseases 253 031
7 - Ensure environmental sustainability 94331 1167
TOTAL 80866 10000
Summary of ODA for completed amp ongoing projects by MDG category from 2001-2005 in million US$
Source NEDA-PMS
ODA for MDGs
INVESTMENTS SUPPORTIVE OF THE MDGs 2005-2010
MDGs COST
(in PhP Billion)
1 - Eradicate extreme poverty amp hunger 129422 - Achieve universal primary education 5673 - Promote gender equality -4 - Reduce child mortality
6995 - Improve maternal health
6 - Combat HIVAIDS malaria amp other diseases
7 - Ensure environmental sustainability 19888 ndash Global partnership for development 1251
TOTAL 17447
Source NEDA-PIS
INTENSIFYING MULTISECTORAL PARTNERSHIP AND COLLABORATION
Government (executive legislature judicial)
Local Government
CSOsAcademe
Local Government
PrivateBusiness
Donor Community
Environmental Situationand Challenges
Goal 7 Ensure Environmental Sustainability
bull Forests resources and watersheds
bull Biodiversity resources
bull Coastal and marine resources
bull Air quality
bull Water resources
bull Waste and toxic chemicals
Area Proportion to Total
(Hectares) ()
7168400 100
2560872 36
Broadleaved 2448864
Mixed 24618
Coniferous 87390
4030588 56
Broadleaved 3847284
Mixed 69861
Coniferous 113443
247362 3
329578 5Source Forest Management Bureau (FMB)
Total Forest
Mangrove
Plantation
Forest Cover by Forest Type 2003
Closed Forest
Open Forest
Category
Area Reforested 1990-2003 (in hectares)Year Total
Government
Percent Non-Government
Percent
Sector
2003 15087 13195 875 1892 125
2002 25620 20682 807 4938 193
2001 31440 26524 844 4916 156
2000 27632 21740 787 5892 213
1999 42165 31183 74 10982 26
1998 42368 33219 784 9149 216
1997 66236 49301 744 16935 256
1996 46096 18869 409 27227 591
1995 65233 21841 335 43392 665
1994 49551 18032 364 31519 636
1993 19211 6347 33 12864 67
1992 40593 24304 599 16289 401
1991 93039 73602 791 19437 209
1990 191663 153949 803 37714 197
Annual Average
53995
Source DENR Annual Report
Biodiversity Resources
Philippineshellip one of the megadiverse countries in the
world higher regard for the endemism of local
species
buthellip most severely threatened of the
megadiverse countries
Coastal and Marine Resources rich sources of fish and aquatic products habitat for countless underwater wildlife natural areas for recreationtourism Water resourcesbull disparities in water supply coverage across regionsbull depletion of ground water especially in Metro
Manila and Metro Cebubull pollution of water sources
Air Qualitybull pollution remains a problem in Metro Manila and
major urban centersbull on the level of suspended particulates (TSP) air
quality is not within standards
Waste and Toxic Chemicalsbull solid waste generation in Metro Manila is estimated at
5345 tons per daybull urbanization inevitably increased the use of chemicalsbull no integrated treatment facility for hazardous waste
Priority Policies and Programs
bull Adoption of Sustainable Forest Management
bull Revised Forestry Code of the Philippines and the Watersheds Code
bull Various biodiversity acts
bull Fisheries Code and AFMA
bull Clean Air Act
Challenges and Priorities for Action
bull Sustainable and more productive utilization of natural resources
bull Focus and strengthen the protection of vulnerable and ecologically fragile areas
bull Create healthier environment for the populationbull Mitigate the occurrence of natural disasters bull Ensure environmental accountability for all
industries
CROSS-CUTTING CHALLENGEShellip
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005
Government Expenditure Program by Sector FY 2000-2005
Social Services Debt Service Economic Services General Public Services Defense
CROSSCUTTING CHALLENGES AND PRIORITIES FOR ACTION
Source DBM Budget of Expenditure and Sources of Financing
FINANCING THE MDGs
SectorYear 2001 2002 2003 2004
Economic Services 15982070 45484830 52853500 58700890
(15) (32) (33) (34)Social Services 28979110 26352690 34001700 36135990
(27) (19) (21) (21)General Public Services 63375820 69580140 73954470 78545740
(58) (49) (46) (45)Total Public Expenditures 108337000 141417660 160809670 173382620
FINANCING THE MDGs
Distribution of Public Expenditures by Local Government UnitsBy Sector 2001-2004 (in thousand pesos)
Source DBM Budget of Expenditure and Sources of Financing
CROSSCUTTING CHALLENGES AND PRIORITIES FOR ACTION
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
2001 2002 2003 2004
ODA Commitments by SectorFY 2001-2004 (US$ million)
Agriculture agrarianreform and naturalresources
Governance andinstitutionsdevelopment
Infrastructuredevelopment
Social reform anddevelopment
Industry and services
Source NEDA-PIS
CROSSCUTTING CHALLENGES AND PRIORITIES FOR ACTION
FINANCING THE MDGs
CROSS-CUTTING CHALLENGES AND
PRIORITIES FOR ACTIONbull Reduce disparities across regions
bull Increase resource allocation for MDG-related programs and projects
bull Enforce fullstricter implementation of laws amp ensure passage of MDG-supportive bills
bull Strengthen monitoring and implementation
bull Scale-up campaign for localization
bull Develop an advocacy plan
bull Intensify multisectoral partnership amp collaboration
Facilitating Factors bull Strong global support for MDGs by the United
Nations ASEAN and other multilateral organizations
bull Expanding national support among policymakers for MDGs (eg creation of the House Committee on MDGs issuance of EO on the MDGs)
bull Prioritization of MDGs in resource allocation (eg focusing of MTPIP investments on MDGs)
bull Increasing awareness and participation of private sector LGUs in MDG-related programs
Hindering Factors
bull Resource constraints (ie MDG financing gap of about $15 billion yearly)
bull Lack of support by creditors for the Debt for MDG ProjectsDebt for Equity in MDG Projects initiative
bull Low budgetary priority for MDGs accorded by some LGUs and
bull Lack of disaggregated data to monitor MDGs at local levels
Parallel Initiatives
Participation in the High-Level Plenary Meeting on MDGs
Formulation of the Plan of Action for Poverty Reduction (2006-2010)Enhance the current Poverty Reduction
Strategy and Program Framework
Advocacy for the Philippine proposal on Debt for Equity in MDG Projects
Implications on the Philippine Economy
MDG attainment would requirebull Enhanced revenue generationbull LGU private sector and civil society supportbull Expansion of microfinance services for the poorbull Pursuit of projects with high economic impactbull Right-sizing the bureaucracybull Privatization andbull Tapping OFW remittances
Annual Per Capita Poverty Threshold Poverty Incidence of Families and Population by Region 2000 and 2003
2000 Revised 2003 2000 Revised 2003 2000 Revised 2003Philippines 11 451 12 267 275 247 330 304NCR 15 693 16 796 57 50 76 73CAR 13 066 13 976 307 248 376 312Region I 12 685 13 276 294 244 351 302Region II 11 128 11 409 252 193 304 245Region III 13 760 14 342 173 137 214 177Region IV-A 13 657 14 616 152 149 191 188Region IV-B 11 995 12 406 363 397 452 479Region V 11 372 12 354 453 405 526 484Region VI 11 313 12 275 366 313 444 391Region VII 9 656 9 779 315 237 362 284Region VIII 9 518 10 802 375 355 451 433Region IX 9 116 10 414 385 441 448 494Region X 10 503 11 609 379 379 438 443Region XI 10 264 11 276 277 281 331 344Region XII 10 466 11 303 407 320 468 384Caraga 10 896 12 000 437 473 509 542ARMM 12 192 12 739 537 457 598 531
Poverty Incidenceof Population ()Region
Annual Per Capita PovertyThreshold (in Pesos)
Poverty Incidenceof Families ()
FIGURE 2 Subsistence Incidence of Population by Region 2003
Legend
Below national average Above national average
Source
NSO_Family and Income Expenditure Study 2003
ARMM 241
Cordillera Region 134
Metro Manila 06
Ilocos Region 112
Cagayan Valley 76
Central Luzon 42
CALABARZON 49
MIMAROPA 229
Bicol Region 266
Western Visayas 177
Central Visayas 146
Eastern Visayas 21
Western Mindanao 328
Northern Mindanao 254
Southern Mindanao 176
Central Mindanao 184
CARAGA 31
Annual Per Capita Food Threshold Subsistence Incidence of Families and Population by Region 2000 and 2003
2000 Revised 2003 2000 Revised 2003 2000 Revised 2003Philippines 7 707 8 134 123 104 158 138NCR 9 570 9 974 07 04 10 06CAR 8 744 9 117 137 98 179 134Region I 8 552 8 903 114 81 152 112Region II 7 560 8 026 93 56 118 76Region III 8 764 9 338 42 29 55 42Region IV-A 8 782 9 189 51 37 65 49Region IV-B 8 078 8 339 174 177 241 229Region V 8 047 8 372 233 203 293 266Region VI 7 983 8 386 174 129 231 177Region VII 6 759 7 016 169 112 207 146Region VIII 7 080 7 696 191 155 248 210Region IX 6 574 7 245 210 279 258 328Region X 7 296 7 999 192 197 238 254Region XI 7 087 7 751 128 135 167 176Region XII 7 235 7 804 179 140 226 184Caraga 7 667 8 353 244 245 307 310ARMM 8 313 8 737 239 186 285 241
RegionAnnual Per Capita Food Subsistence Incidence Subsistence Incidence
Threshold (in Pesos) of Families () of Population ()
FIGURE 3 Gini Concentration Ratios by Region 2003
Legend
Below National AverageAbove National Average
ARMM 03464
Cordillera Region 04294
Metro Manila 0413
Ilocos Region 03968
Cagayan Valley 04411
Central Luzon 03486
CALABARZON 04058
MIMAROPA 04354
Bicol Region 04648
Western Visayas 04392
Central Visayas 04711
Eastern Visayas 04577
Western Mindanao 05197
Northern Mindanao 04768
Southern Mindanao 04583
Central Mindanao 04567
CARAGA 04294
Gini Coefficient Among Families by Region 2000 and 2003
Region2000 2003 Change
Philippines 04822 04660 -16NCR 04451 04130 -32CAR 04439 04294 -15Region I 04071 03968 -10Region II 04227 04411 18Region III 03591 03486 -11Region IV-A 04086 04058 -03Region IV-B 04076 04354 28Region V 04455 04648 19Region VI 04594 04392 -20Region VII 04691 04711 02Region VIII 04807 04577 -23Region IX 04732 05197 47Region X 04794 04768 -03Region XI 04318 04567 25Region XII 04631 04583 -05Caraga 04118 04294 18ARMM 03171 03464 29
GINI
FIGURE 4 Percentage of Households with Less than 100 Energy Adequacy
FIGURE 5 Percentage of Underweight Children 0-5 Year Olds
Meeting Goal 1 Eradicate Extreme Poverty and Hunger
Priority Policies and Programs
bull Kapit-Bisig Laban sa Kahirapan (KALAHI)
bull Enrolment of 7 million beneficiaries under the National Health Insurance Program (NHIP)
bull Wholesale portfolio of the Peoplersquos Credit and Finance Corporation (PCFC)
bull Implementation of asset reform programs
bull Delivery of human development services
MDGs Amount
(in US$ million)
Share to Total MDG-
Related ODA
1 - Eradicate extreme poverty amp hunger 62594 7740
2 - Achieve universal primary education 5579 690
3 - Promote gender equality 38 005
4 - Reduce child mortality 1399 173
5 - Improve maternal health 1570 194
6 - Combat HIVAIDS malaria amp other diseases 253 031
7 - Ensure environmental sustainability 94331 1167
TOTAL 80866 10000
Summary of ODA for completed amp ongoing projects by MDG category from 2001-2005 in million US$
Source NEDA-PMS
ODA for MDGs
INVESTMENTS SUPPORTIVE OF THE MDGs 2005-2010
MDGs COST
(in PhP Billion)
1 - Eradicate extreme poverty amp hunger 129422 - Achieve universal primary education 5673 - Promote gender equality -4 - Reduce child mortality
6995 - Improve maternal health
6 - Combat HIVAIDS malaria amp other diseases
7 - Ensure environmental sustainability 19888 ndash Global partnership for development 1251
TOTAL 17447
Source NEDA-PIS
INTENSIFYING MULTISECTORAL PARTNERSHIP AND COLLABORATION
Government (executive legislature judicial)
Local Government
CSOsAcademe
Local Government
PrivateBusiness
Donor Community
Environmental Situationand Challenges
Goal 7 Ensure Environmental Sustainability
bull Forests resources and watersheds
bull Biodiversity resources
bull Coastal and marine resources
bull Air quality
bull Water resources
bull Waste and toxic chemicals
Area Proportion to Total
(Hectares) ()
7168400 100
2560872 36
Broadleaved 2448864
Mixed 24618
Coniferous 87390
4030588 56
Broadleaved 3847284
Mixed 69861
Coniferous 113443
247362 3
329578 5Source Forest Management Bureau (FMB)
Total Forest
Mangrove
Plantation
Forest Cover by Forest Type 2003
Closed Forest
Open Forest
Category
Area Reforested 1990-2003 (in hectares)Year Total
Government
Percent Non-Government
Percent
Sector
2003 15087 13195 875 1892 125
2002 25620 20682 807 4938 193
2001 31440 26524 844 4916 156
2000 27632 21740 787 5892 213
1999 42165 31183 74 10982 26
1998 42368 33219 784 9149 216
1997 66236 49301 744 16935 256
1996 46096 18869 409 27227 591
1995 65233 21841 335 43392 665
1994 49551 18032 364 31519 636
1993 19211 6347 33 12864 67
1992 40593 24304 599 16289 401
1991 93039 73602 791 19437 209
1990 191663 153949 803 37714 197
Annual Average
53995
Source DENR Annual Report
Biodiversity Resources
Philippineshellip one of the megadiverse countries in the
world higher regard for the endemism of local
species
buthellip most severely threatened of the
megadiverse countries
Coastal and Marine Resources rich sources of fish and aquatic products habitat for countless underwater wildlife natural areas for recreationtourism Water resourcesbull disparities in water supply coverage across regionsbull depletion of ground water especially in Metro
Manila and Metro Cebubull pollution of water sources
Air Qualitybull pollution remains a problem in Metro Manila and
major urban centersbull on the level of suspended particulates (TSP) air
quality is not within standards
Waste and Toxic Chemicalsbull solid waste generation in Metro Manila is estimated at
5345 tons per daybull urbanization inevitably increased the use of chemicalsbull no integrated treatment facility for hazardous waste
Priority Policies and Programs
bull Adoption of Sustainable Forest Management
bull Revised Forestry Code of the Philippines and the Watersheds Code
bull Various biodiversity acts
bull Fisheries Code and AFMA
bull Clean Air Act
Challenges and Priorities for Action
bull Sustainable and more productive utilization of natural resources
bull Focus and strengthen the protection of vulnerable and ecologically fragile areas
bull Create healthier environment for the populationbull Mitigate the occurrence of natural disasters bull Ensure environmental accountability for all
industries
CROSS-CUTTING CHALLENGEShellip
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005
Government Expenditure Program by Sector FY 2000-2005
Social Services Debt Service Economic Services General Public Services Defense
CROSSCUTTING CHALLENGES AND PRIORITIES FOR ACTION
Source DBM Budget of Expenditure and Sources of Financing
FINANCING THE MDGs
SectorYear 2001 2002 2003 2004
Economic Services 15982070 45484830 52853500 58700890
(15) (32) (33) (34)Social Services 28979110 26352690 34001700 36135990
(27) (19) (21) (21)General Public Services 63375820 69580140 73954470 78545740
(58) (49) (46) (45)Total Public Expenditures 108337000 141417660 160809670 173382620
FINANCING THE MDGs
Distribution of Public Expenditures by Local Government UnitsBy Sector 2001-2004 (in thousand pesos)
Source DBM Budget of Expenditure and Sources of Financing
CROSSCUTTING CHALLENGES AND PRIORITIES FOR ACTION
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
2001 2002 2003 2004
ODA Commitments by SectorFY 2001-2004 (US$ million)
Agriculture agrarianreform and naturalresources
Governance andinstitutionsdevelopment
Infrastructuredevelopment
Social reform anddevelopment
Industry and services
Source NEDA-PIS
CROSSCUTTING CHALLENGES AND PRIORITIES FOR ACTION
FINANCING THE MDGs
CROSS-CUTTING CHALLENGES AND
PRIORITIES FOR ACTIONbull Reduce disparities across regions
bull Increase resource allocation for MDG-related programs and projects
bull Enforce fullstricter implementation of laws amp ensure passage of MDG-supportive bills
bull Strengthen monitoring and implementation
bull Scale-up campaign for localization
bull Develop an advocacy plan
bull Intensify multisectoral partnership amp collaboration
Facilitating Factors bull Strong global support for MDGs by the United
Nations ASEAN and other multilateral organizations
bull Expanding national support among policymakers for MDGs (eg creation of the House Committee on MDGs issuance of EO on the MDGs)
bull Prioritization of MDGs in resource allocation (eg focusing of MTPIP investments on MDGs)
bull Increasing awareness and participation of private sector LGUs in MDG-related programs
Hindering Factors
bull Resource constraints (ie MDG financing gap of about $15 billion yearly)
bull Lack of support by creditors for the Debt for MDG ProjectsDebt for Equity in MDG Projects initiative
bull Low budgetary priority for MDGs accorded by some LGUs and
bull Lack of disaggregated data to monitor MDGs at local levels
Parallel Initiatives
Participation in the High-Level Plenary Meeting on MDGs
Formulation of the Plan of Action for Poverty Reduction (2006-2010)Enhance the current Poverty Reduction
Strategy and Program Framework
Advocacy for the Philippine proposal on Debt for Equity in MDG Projects
Implications on the Philippine Economy
MDG attainment would requirebull Enhanced revenue generationbull LGU private sector and civil society supportbull Expansion of microfinance services for the poorbull Pursuit of projects with high economic impactbull Right-sizing the bureaucracybull Privatization andbull Tapping OFW remittances
FIGURE 2 Subsistence Incidence of Population by Region 2003
Legend
Below national average Above national average
Source
NSO_Family and Income Expenditure Study 2003
ARMM 241
Cordillera Region 134
Metro Manila 06
Ilocos Region 112
Cagayan Valley 76
Central Luzon 42
CALABARZON 49
MIMAROPA 229
Bicol Region 266
Western Visayas 177
Central Visayas 146
Eastern Visayas 21
Western Mindanao 328
Northern Mindanao 254
Southern Mindanao 176
Central Mindanao 184
CARAGA 31
Annual Per Capita Food Threshold Subsistence Incidence of Families and Population by Region 2000 and 2003
2000 Revised 2003 2000 Revised 2003 2000 Revised 2003Philippines 7 707 8 134 123 104 158 138NCR 9 570 9 974 07 04 10 06CAR 8 744 9 117 137 98 179 134Region I 8 552 8 903 114 81 152 112Region II 7 560 8 026 93 56 118 76Region III 8 764 9 338 42 29 55 42Region IV-A 8 782 9 189 51 37 65 49Region IV-B 8 078 8 339 174 177 241 229Region V 8 047 8 372 233 203 293 266Region VI 7 983 8 386 174 129 231 177Region VII 6 759 7 016 169 112 207 146Region VIII 7 080 7 696 191 155 248 210Region IX 6 574 7 245 210 279 258 328Region X 7 296 7 999 192 197 238 254Region XI 7 087 7 751 128 135 167 176Region XII 7 235 7 804 179 140 226 184Caraga 7 667 8 353 244 245 307 310ARMM 8 313 8 737 239 186 285 241
RegionAnnual Per Capita Food Subsistence Incidence Subsistence Incidence
Threshold (in Pesos) of Families () of Population ()
FIGURE 3 Gini Concentration Ratios by Region 2003
Legend
Below National AverageAbove National Average
ARMM 03464
Cordillera Region 04294
Metro Manila 0413
Ilocos Region 03968
Cagayan Valley 04411
Central Luzon 03486
CALABARZON 04058
MIMAROPA 04354
Bicol Region 04648
Western Visayas 04392
Central Visayas 04711
Eastern Visayas 04577
Western Mindanao 05197
Northern Mindanao 04768
Southern Mindanao 04583
Central Mindanao 04567
CARAGA 04294
Gini Coefficient Among Families by Region 2000 and 2003
Region2000 2003 Change
Philippines 04822 04660 -16NCR 04451 04130 -32CAR 04439 04294 -15Region I 04071 03968 -10Region II 04227 04411 18Region III 03591 03486 -11Region IV-A 04086 04058 -03Region IV-B 04076 04354 28Region V 04455 04648 19Region VI 04594 04392 -20Region VII 04691 04711 02Region VIII 04807 04577 -23Region IX 04732 05197 47Region X 04794 04768 -03Region XI 04318 04567 25Region XII 04631 04583 -05Caraga 04118 04294 18ARMM 03171 03464 29
GINI
FIGURE 4 Percentage of Households with Less than 100 Energy Adequacy
FIGURE 5 Percentage of Underweight Children 0-5 Year Olds
Meeting Goal 1 Eradicate Extreme Poverty and Hunger
Priority Policies and Programs
bull Kapit-Bisig Laban sa Kahirapan (KALAHI)
bull Enrolment of 7 million beneficiaries under the National Health Insurance Program (NHIP)
bull Wholesale portfolio of the Peoplersquos Credit and Finance Corporation (PCFC)
bull Implementation of asset reform programs
bull Delivery of human development services
MDGs Amount
(in US$ million)
Share to Total MDG-
Related ODA
1 - Eradicate extreme poverty amp hunger 62594 7740
2 - Achieve universal primary education 5579 690
3 - Promote gender equality 38 005
4 - Reduce child mortality 1399 173
5 - Improve maternal health 1570 194
6 - Combat HIVAIDS malaria amp other diseases 253 031
7 - Ensure environmental sustainability 94331 1167
TOTAL 80866 10000
Summary of ODA for completed amp ongoing projects by MDG category from 2001-2005 in million US$
Source NEDA-PMS
ODA for MDGs
INVESTMENTS SUPPORTIVE OF THE MDGs 2005-2010
MDGs COST
(in PhP Billion)
1 - Eradicate extreme poverty amp hunger 129422 - Achieve universal primary education 5673 - Promote gender equality -4 - Reduce child mortality
6995 - Improve maternal health
6 - Combat HIVAIDS malaria amp other diseases
7 - Ensure environmental sustainability 19888 ndash Global partnership for development 1251
TOTAL 17447
Source NEDA-PIS
INTENSIFYING MULTISECTORAL PARTNERSHIP AND COLLABORATION
Government (executive legislature judicial)
Local Government
CSOsAcademe
Local Government
PrivateBusiness
Donor Community
Environmental Situationand Challenges
Goal 7 Ensure Environmental Sustainability
bull Forests resources and watersheds
bull Biodiversity resources
bull Coastal and marine resources
bull Air quality
bull Water resources
bull Waste and toxic chemicals
Area Proportion to Total
(Hectares) ()
7168400 100
2560872 36
Broadleaved 2448864
Mixed 24618
Coniferous 87390
4030588 56
Broadleaved 3847284
Mixed 69861
Coniferous 113443
247362 3
329578 5Source Forest Management Bureau (FMB)
Total Forest
Mangrove
Plantation
Forest Cover by Forest Type 2003
Closed Forest
Open Forest
Category
Area Reforested 1990-2003 (in hectares)Year Total
Government
Percent Non-Government
Percent
Sector
2003 15087 13195 875 1892 125
2002 25620 20682 807 4938 193
2001 31440 26524 844 4916 156
2000 27632 21740 787 5892 213
1999 42165 31183 74 10982 26
1998 42368 33219 784 9149 216
1997 66236 49301 744 16935 256
1996 46096 18869 409 27227 591
1995 65233 21841 335 43392 665
1994 49551 18032 364 31519 636
1993 19211 6347 33 12864 67
1992 40593 24304 599 16289 401
1991 93039 73602 791 19437 209
1990 191663 153949 803 37714 197
Annual Average
53995
Source DENR Annual Report
Biodiversity Resources
Philippineshellip one of the megadiverse countries in the
world higher regard for the endemism of local
species
buthellip most severely threatened of the
megadiverse countries
Coastal and Marine Resources rich sources of fish and aquatic products habitat for countless underwater wildlife natural areas for recreationtourism Water resourcesbull disparities in water supply coverage across regionsbull depletion of ground water especially in Metro
Manila and Metro Cebubull pollution of water sources
Air Qualitybull pollution remains a problem in Metro Manila and
major urban centersbull on the level of suspended particulates (TSP) air
quality is not within standards
Waste and Toxic Chemicalsbull solid waste generation in Metro Manila is estimated at
5345 tons per daybull urbanization inevitably increased the use of chemicalsbull no integrated treatment facility for hazardous waste
Priority Policies and Programs
bull Adoption of Sustainable Forest Management
bull Revised Forestry Code of the Philippines and the Watersheds Code
bull Various biodiversity acts
bull Fisheries Code and AFMA
bull Clean Air Act
Challenges and Priorities for Action
bull Sustainable and more productive utilization of natural resources
bull Focus and strengthen the protection of vulnerable and ecologically fragile areas
bull Create healthier environment for the populationbull Mitigate the occurrence of natural disasters bull Ensure environmental accountability for all
industries
CROSS-CUTTING CHALLENGEShellip
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005
Government Expenditure Program by Sector FY 2000-2005
Social Services Debt Service Economic Services General Public Services Defense
CROSSCUTTING CHALLENGES AND PRIORITIES FOR ACTION
Source DBM Budget of Expenditure and Sources of Financing
FINANCING THE MDGs
SectorYear 2001 2002 2003 2004
Economic Services 15982070 45484830 52853500 58700890
(15) (32) (33) (34)Social Services 28979110 26352690 34001700 36135990
(27) (19) (21) (21)General Public Services 63375820 69580140 73954470 78545740
(58) (49) (46) (45)Total Public Expenditures 108337000 141417660 160809670 173382620
FINANCING THE MDGs
Distribution of Public Expenditures by Local Government UnitsBy Sector 2001-2004 (in thousand pesos)
Source DBM Budget of Expenditure and Sources of Financing
CROSSCUTTING CHALLENGES AND PRIORITIES FOR ACTION
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
2001 2002 2003 2004
ODA Commitments by SectorFY 2001-2004 (US$ million)
Agriculture agrarianreform and naturalresources
Governance andinstitutionsdevelopment
Infrastructuredevelopment
Social reform anddevelopment
Industry and services
Source NEDA-PIS
CROSSCUTTING CHALLENGES AND PRIORITIES FOR ACTION
FINANCING THE MDGs
CROSS-CUTTING CHALLENGES AND
PRIORITIES FOR ACTIONbull Reduce disparities across regions
bull Increase resource allocation for MDG-related programs and projects
bull Enforce fullstricter implementation of laws amp ensure passage of MDG-supportive bills
bull Strengthen monitoring and implementation
bull Scale-up campaign for localization
bull Develop an advocacy plan
bull Intensify multisectoral partnership amp collaboration
Facilitating Factors bull Strong global support for MDGs by the United
Nations ASEAN and other multilateral organizations
bull Expanding national support among policymakers for MDGs (eg creation of the House Committee on MDGs issuance of EO on the MDGs)
bull Prioritization of MDGs in resource allocation (eg focusing of MTPIP investments on MDGs)
bull Increasing awareness and participation of private sector LGUs in MDG-related programs
Hindering Factors
bull Resource constraints (ie MDG financing gap of about $15 billion yearly)
bull Lack of support by creditors for the Debt for MDG ProjectsDebt for Equity in MDG Projects initiative
bull Low budgetary priority for MDGs accorded by some LGUs and
bull Lack of disaggregated data to monitor MDGs at local levels
Parallel Initiatives
Participation in the High-Level Plenary Meeting on MDGs
Formulation of the Plan of Action for Poverty Reduction (2006-2010)Enhance the current Poverty Reduction
Strategy and Program Framework
Advocacy for the Philippine proposal on Debt for Equity in MDG Projects
Implications on the Philippine Economy
MDG attainment would requirebull Enhanced revenue generationbull LGU private sector and civil society supportbull Expansion of microfinance services for the poorbull Pursuit of projects with high economic impactbull Right-sizing the bureaucracybull Privatization andbull Tapping OFW remittances
Annual Per Capita Food Threshold Subsistence Incidence of Families and Population by Region 2000 and 2003
2000 Revised 2003 2000 Revised 2003 2000 Revised 2003Philippines 7 707 8 134 123 104 158 138NCR 9 570 9 974 07 04 10 06CAR 8 744 9 117 137 98 179 134Region I 8 552 8 903 114 81 152 112Region II 7 560 8 026 93 56 118 76Region III 8 764 9 338 42 29 55 42Region IV-A 8 782 9 189 51 37 65 49Region IV-B 8 078 8 339 174 177 241 229Region V 8 047 8 372 233 203 293 266Region VI 7 983 8 386 174 129 231 177Region VII 6 759 7 016 169 112 207 146Region VIII 7 080 7 696 191 155 248 210Region IX 6 574 7 245 210 279 258 328Region X 7 296 7 999 192 197 238 254Region XI 7 087 7 751 128 135 167 176Region XII 7 235 7 804 179 140 226 184Caraga 7 667 8 353 244 245 307 310ARMM 8 313 8 737 239 186 285 241
RegionAnnual Per Capita Food Subsistence Incidence Subsistence Incidence
Threshold (in Pesos) of Families () of Population ()
FIGURE 3 Gini Concentration Ratios by Region 2003
Legend
Below National AverageAbove National Average
ARMM 03464
Cordillera Region 04294
Metro Manila 0413
Ilocos Region 03968
Cagayan Valley 04411
Central Luzon 03486
CALABARZON 04058
MIMAROPA 04354
Bicol Region 04648
Western Visayas 04392
Central Visayas 04711
Eastern Visayas 04577
Western Mindanao 05197
Northern Mindanao 04768
Southern Mindanao 04583
Central Mindanao 04567
CARAGA 04294
Gini Coefficient Among Families by Region 2000 and 2003
Region2000 2003 Change
Philippines 04822 04660 -16NCR 04451 04130 -32CAR 04439 04294 -15Region I 04071 03968 -10Region II 04227 04411 18Region III 03591 03486 -11Region IV-A 04086 04058 -03Region IV-B 04076 04354 28Region V 04455 04648 19Region VI 04594 04392 -20Region VII 04691 04711 02Region VIII 04807 04577 -23Region IX 04732 05197 47Region X 04794 04768 -03Region XI 04318 04567 25Region XII 04631 04583 -05Caraga 04118 04294 18ARMM 03171 03464 29
GINI
FIGURE 4 Percentage of Households with Less than 100 Energy Adequacy
FIGURE 5 Percentage of Underweight Children 0-5 Year Olds
Meeting Goal 1 Eradicate Extreme Poverty and Hunger
Priority Policies and Programs
bull Kapit-Bisig Laban sa Kahirapan (KALAHI)
bull Enrolment of 7 million beneficiaries under the National Health Insurance Program (NHIP)
bull Wholesale portfolio of the Peoplersquos Credit and Finance Corporation (PCFC)
bull Implementation of asset reform programs
bull Delivery of human development services
MDGs Amount
(in US$ million)
Share to Total MDG-
Related ODA
1 - Eradicate extreme poverty amp hunger 62594 7740
2 - Achieve universal primary education 5579 690
3 - Promote gender equality 38 005
4 - Reduce child mortality 1399 173
5 - Improve maternal health 1570 194
6 - Combat HIVAIDS malaria amp other diseases 253 031
7 - Ensure environmental sustainability 94331 1167
TOTAL 80866 10000
Summary of ODA for completed amp ongoing projects by MDG category from 2001-2005 in million US$
Source NEDA-PMS
ODA for MDGs
INVESTMENTS SUPPORTIVE OF THE MDGs 2005-2010
MDGs COST
(in PhP Billion)
1 - Eradicate extreme poverty amp hunger 129422 - Achieve universal primary education 5673 - Promote gender equality -4 - Reduce child mortality
6995 - Improve maternal health
6 - Combat HIVAIDS malaria amp other diseases
7 - Ensure environmental sustainability 19888 ndash Global partnership for development 1251
TOTAL 17447
Source NEDA-PIS
INTENSIFYING MULTISECTORAL PARTNERSHIP AND COLLABORATION
Government (executive legislature judicial)
Local Government
CSOsAcademe
Local Government
PrivateBusiness
Donor Community
Environmental Situationand Challenges
Goal 7 Ensure Environmental Sustainability
bull Forests resources and watersheds
bull Biodiversity resources
bull Coastal and marine resources
bull Air quality
bull Water resources
bull Waste and toxic chemicals
Area Proportion to Total
(Hectares) ()
7168400 100
2560872 36
Broadleaved 2448864
Mixed 24618
Coniferous 87390
4030588 56
Broadleaved 3847284
Mixed 69861
Coniferous 113443
247362 3
329578 5Source Forest Management Bureau (FMB)
Total Forest
Mangrove
Plantation
Forest Cover by Forest Type 2003
Closed Forest
Open Forest
Category
Area Reforested 1990-2003 (in hectares)Year Total
Government
Percent Non-Government
Percent
Sector
2003 15087 13195 875 1892 125
2002 25620 20682 807 4938 193
2001 31440 26524 844 4916 156
2000 27632 21740 787 5892 213
1999 42165 31183 74 10982 26
1998 42368 33219 784 9149 216
1997 66236 49301 744 16935 256
1996 46096 18869 409 27227 591
1995 65233 21841 335 43392 665
1994 49551 18032 364 31519 636
1993 19211 6347 33 12864 67
1992 40593 24304 599 16289 401
1991 93039 73602 791 19437 209
1990 191663 153949 803 37714 197
Annual Average
53995
Source DENR Annual Report
Biodiversity Resources
Philippineshellip one of the megadiverse countries in the
world higher regard for the endemism of local
species
buthellip most severely threatened of the
megadiverse countries
Coastal and Marine Resources rich sources of fish and aquatic products habitat for countless underwater wildlife natural areas for recreationtourism Water resourcesbull disparities in water supply coverage across regionsbull depletion of ground water especially in Metro
Manila and Metro Cebubull pollution of water sources
Air Qualitybull pollution remains a problem in Metro Manila and
major urban centersbull on the level of suspended particulates (TSP) air
quality is not within standards
Waste and Toxic Chemicalsbull solid waste generation in Metro Manila is estimated at
5345 tons per daybull urbanization inevitably increased the use of chemicalsbull no integrated treatment facility for hazardous waste
Priority Policies and Programs
bull Adoption of Sustainable Forest Management
bull Revised Forestry Code of the Philippines and the Watersheds Code
bull Various biodiversity acts
bull Fisheries Code and AFMA
bull Clean Air Act
Challenges and Priorities for Action
bull Sustainable and more productive utilization of natural resources
bull Focus and strengthen the protection of vulnerable and ecologically fragile areas
bull Create healthier environment for the populationbull Mitigate the occurrence of natural disasters bull Ensure environmental accountability for all
industries
CROSS-CUTTING CHALLENGEShellip
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005
Government Expenditure Program by Sector FY 2000-2005
Social Services Debt Service Economic Services General Public Services Defense
CROSSCUTTING CHALLENGES AND PRIORITIES FOR ACTION
Source DBM Budget of Expenditure and Sources of Financing
FINANCING THE MDGs
SectorYear 2001 2002 2003 2004
Economic Services 15982070 45484830 52853500 58700890
(15) (32) (33) (34)Social Services 28979110 26352690 34001700 36135990
(27) (19) (21) (21)General Public Services 63375820 69580140 73954470 78545740
(58) (49) (46) (45)Total Public Expenditures 108337000 141417660 160809670 173382620
FINANCING THE MDGs
Distribution of Public Expenditures by Local Government UnitsBy Sector 2001-2004 (in thousand pesos)
Source DBM Budget of Expenditure and Sources of Financing
CROSSCUTTING CHALLENGES AND PRIORITIES FOR ACTION
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
2001 2002 2003 2004
ODA Commitments by SectorFY 2001-2004 (US$ million)
Agriculture agrarianreform and naturalresources
Governance andinstitutionsdevelopment
Infrastructuredevelopment
Social reform anddevelopment
Industry and services
Source NEDA-PIS
CROSSCUTTING CHALLENGES AND PRIORITIES FOR ACTION
FINANCING THE MDGs
CROSS-CUTTING CHALLENGES AND
PRIORITIES FOR ACTIONbull Reduce disparities across regions
bull Increase resource allocation for MDG-related programs and projects
bull Enforce fullstricter implementation of laws amp ensure passage of MDG-supportive bills
bull Strengthen monitoring and implementation
bull Scale-up campaign for localization
bull Develop an advocacy plan
bull Intensify multisectoral partnership amp collaboration
Facilitating Factors bull Strong global support for MDGs by the United
Nations ASEAN and other multilateral organizations
bull Expanding national support among policymakers for MDGs (eg creation of the House Committee on MDGs issuance of EO on the MDGs)
bull Prioritization of MDGs in resource allocation (eg focusing of MTPIP investments on MDGs)
bull Increasing awareness and participation of private sector LGUs in MDG-related programs
Hindering Factors
bull Resource constraints (ie MDG financing gap of about $15 billion yearly)
bull Lack of support by creditors for the Debt for MDG ProjectsDebt for Equity in MDG Projects initiative
bull Low budgetary priority for MDGs accorded by some LGUs and
bull Lack of disaggregated data to monitor MDGs at local levels
Parallel Initiatives
Participation in the High-Level Plenary Meeting on MDGs
Formulation of the Plan of Action for Poverty Reduction (2006-2010)Enhance the current Poverty Reduction
Strategy and Program Framework
Advocacy for the Philippine proposal on Debt for Equity in MDG Projects
Implications on the Philippine Economy
MDG attainment would requirebull Enhanced revenue generationbull LGU private sector and civil society supportbull Expansion of microfinance services for the poorbull Pursuit of projects with high economic impactbull Right-sizing the bureaucracybull Privatization andbull Tapping OFW remittances
FIGURE 3 Gini Concentration Ratios by Region 2003
Legend
Below National AverageAbove National Average
ARMM 03464
Cordillera Region 04294
Metro Manila 0413
Ilocos Region 03968
Cagayan Valley 04411
Central Luzon 03486
CALABARZON 04058
MIMAROPA 04354
Bicol Region 04648
Western Visayas 04392
Central Visayas 04711
Eastern Visayas 04577
Western Mindanao 05197
Northern Mindanao 04768
Southern Mindanao 04583
Central Mindanao 04567
CARAGA 04294
Gini Coefficient Among Families by Region 2000 and 2003
Region2000 2003 Change
Philippines 04822 04660 -16NCR 04451 04130 -32CAR 04439 04294 -15Region I 04071 03968 -10Region II 04227 04411 18Region III 03591 03486 -11Region IV-A 04086 04058 -03Region IV-B 04076 04354 28Region V 04455 04648 19Region VI 04594 04392 -20Region VII 04691 04711 02Region VIII 04807 04577 -23Region IX 04732 05197 47Region X 04794 04768 -03Region XI 04318 04567 25Region XII 04631 04583 -05Caraga 04118 04294 18ARMM 03171 03464 29
GINI
FIGURE 4 Percentage of Households with Less than 100 Energy Adequacy
FIGURE 5 Percentage of Underweight Children 0-5 Year Olds
Meeting Goal 1 Eradicate Extreme Poverty and Hunger
Priority Policies and Programs
bull Kapit-Bisig Laban sa Kahirapan (KALAHI)
bull Enrolment of 7 million beneficiaries under the National Health Insurance Program (NHIP)
bull Wholesale portfolio of the Peoplersquos Credit and Finance Corporation (PCFC)
bull Implementation of asset reform programs
bull Delivery of human development services
MDGs Amount
(in US$ million)
Share to Total MDG-
Related ODA
1 - Eradicate extreme poverty amp hunger 62594 7740
2 - Achieve universal primary education 5579 690
3 - Promote gender equality 38 005
4 - Reduce child mortality 1399 173
5 - Improve maternal health 1570 194
6 - Combat HIVAIDS malaria amp other diseases 253 031
7 - Ensure environmental sustainability 94331 1167
TOTAL 80866 10000
Summary of ODA for completed amp ongoing projects by MDG category from 2001-2005 in million US$
Source NEDA-PMS
ODA for MDGs
INVESTMENTS SUPPORTIVE OF THE MDGs 2005-2010
MDGs COST
(in PhP Billion)
1 - Eradicate extreme poverty amp hunger 129422 - Achieve universal primary education 5673 - Promote gender equality -4 - Reduce child mortality
6995 - Improve maternal health
6 - Combat HIVAIDS malaria amp other diseases
7 - Ensure environmental sustainability 19888 ndash Global partnership for development 1251
TOTAL 17447
Source NEDA-PIS
INTENSIFYING MULTISECTORAL PARTNERSHIP AND COLLABORATION
Government (executive legislature judicial)
Local Government
CSOsAcademe
Local Government
PrivateBusiness
Donor Community
Environmental Situationand Challenges
Goal 7 Ensure Environmental Sustainability
bull Forests resources and watersheds
bull Biodiversity resources
bull Coastal and marine resources
bull Air quality
bull Water resources
bull Waste and toxic chemicals
Area Proportion to Total
(Hectares) ()
7168400 100
2560872 36
Broadleaved 2448864
Mixed 24618
Coniferous 87390
4030588 56
Broadleaved 3847284
Mixed 69861
Coniferous 113443
247362 3
329578 5Source Forest Management Bureau (FMB)
Total Forest
Mangrove
Plantation
Forest Cover by Forest Type 2003
Closed Forest
Open Forest
Category
Area Reforested 1990-2003 (in hectares)Year Total
Government
Percent Non-Government
Percent
Sector
2003 15087 13195 875 1892 125
2002 25620 20682 807 4938 193
2001 31440 26524 844 4916 156
2000 27632 21740 787 5892 213
1999 42165 31183 74 10982 26
1998 42368 33219 784 9149 216
1997 66236 49301 744 16935 256
1996 46096 18869 409 27227 591
1995 65233 21841 335 43392 665
1994 49551 18032 364 31519 636
1993 19211 6347 33 12864 67
1992 40593 24304 599 16289 401
1991 93039 73602 791 19437 209
1990 191663 153949 803 37714 197
Annual Average
53995
Source DENR Annual Report
Biodiversity Resources
Philippineshellip one of the megadiverse countries in the
world higher regard for the endemism of local
species
buthellip most severely threatened of the
megadiverse countries
Coastal and Marine Resources rich sources of fish and aquatic products habitat for countless underwater wildlife natural areas for recreationtourism Water resourcesbull disparities in water supply coverage across regionsbull depletion of ground water especially in Metro
Manila and Metro Cebubull pollution of water sources
Air Qualitybull pollution remains a problem in Metro Manila and
major urban centersbull on the level of suspended particulates (TSP) air
quality is not within standards
Waste and Toxic Chemicalsbull solid waste generation in Metro Manila is estimated at
5345 tons per daybull urbanization inevitably increased the use of chemicalsbull no integrated treatment facility for hazardous waste
Priority Policies and Programs
bull Adoption of Sustainable Forest Management
bull Revised Forestry Code of the Philippines and the Watersheds Code
bull Various biodiversity acts
bull Fisheries Code and AFMA
bull Clean Air Act
Challenges and Priorities for Action
bull Sustainable and more productive utilization of natural resources
bull Focus and strengthen the protection of vulnerable and ecologically fragile areas
bull Create healthier environment for the populationbull Mitigate the occurrence of natural disasters bull Ensure environmental accountability for all
industries
CROSS-CUTTING CHALLENGEShellip
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005
Government Expenditure Program by Sector FY 2000-2005
Social Services Debt Service Economic Services General Public Services Defense
CROSSCUTTING CHALLENGES AND PRIORITIES FOR ACTION
Source DBM Budget of Expenditure and Sources of Financing
FINANCING THE MDGs
SectorYear 2001 2002 2003 2004
Economic Services 15982070 45484830 52853500 58700890
(15) (32) (33) (34)Social Services 28979110 26352690 34001700 36135990
(27) (19) (21) (21)General Public Services 63375820 69580140 73954470 78545740
(58) (49) (46) (45)Total Public Expenditures 108337000 141417660 160809670 173382620
FINANCING THE MDGs
Distribution of Public Expenditures by Local Government UnitsBy Sector 2001-2004 (in thousand pesos)
Source DBM Budget of Expenditure and Sources of Financing
CROSSCUTTING CHALLENGES AND PRIORITIES FOR ACTION
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
2001 2002 2003 2004
ODA Commitments by SectorFY 2001-2004 (US$ million)
Agriculture agrarianreform and naturalresources
Governance andinstitutionsdevelopment
Infrastructuredevelopment
Social reform anddevelopment
Industry and services
Source NEDA-PIS
CROSSCUTTING CHALLENGES AND PRIORITIES FOR ACTION
FINANCING THE MDGs
CROSS-CUTTING CHALLENGES AND
PRIORITIES FOR ACTIONbull Reduce disparities across regions
bull Increase resource allocation for MDG-related programs and projects
bull Enforce fullstricter implementation of laws amp ensure passage of MDG-supportive bills
bull Strengthen monitoring and implementation
bull Scale-up campaign for localization
bull Develop an advocacy plan
bull Intensify multisectoral partnership amp collaboration
Facilitating Factors bull Strong global support for MDGs by the United
Nations ASEAN and other multilateral organizations
bull Expanding national support among policymakers for MDGs (eg creation of the House Committee on MDGs issuance of EO on the MDGs)
bull Prioritization of MDGs in resource allocation (eg focusing of MTPIP investments on MDGs)
bull Increasing awareness and participation of private sector LGUs in MDG-related programs
Hindering Factors
bull Resource constraints (ie MDG financing gap of about $15 billion yearly)
bull Lack of support by creditors for the Debt for MDG ProjectsDebt for Equity in MDG Projects initiative
bull Low budgetary priority for MDGs accorded by some LGUs and
bull Lack of disaggregated data to monitor MDGs at local levels
Parallel Initiatives
Participation in the High-Level Plenary Meeting on MDGs
Formulation of the Plan of Action for Poverty Reduction (2006-2010)Enhance the current Poverty Reduction
Strategy and Program Framework
Advocacy for the Philippine proposal on Debt for Equity in MDG Projects
Implications on the Philippine Economy
MDG attainment would requirebull Enhanced revenue generationbull LGU private sector and civil society supportbull Expansion of microfinance services for the poorbull Pursuit of projects with high economic impactbull Right-sizing the bureaucracybull Privatization andbull Tapping OFW remittances
Gini Coefficient Among Families by Region 2000 and 2003
Region2000 2003 Change
Philippines 04822 04660 -16NCR 04451 04130 -32CAR 04439 04294 -15Region I 04071 03968 -10Region II 04227 04411 18Region III 03591 03486 -11Region IV-A 04086 04058 -03Region IV-B 04076 04354 28Region V 04455 04648 19Region VI 04594 04392 -20Region VII 04691 04711 02Region VIII 04807 04577 -23Region IX 04732 05197 47Region X 04794 04768 -03Region XI 04318 04567 25Region XII 04631 04583 -05Caraga 04118 04294 18ARMM 03171 03464 29
GINI
FIGURE 4 Percentage of Households with Less than 100 Energy Adequacy
FIGURE 5 Percentage of Underweight Children 0-5 Year Olds
Meeting Goal 1 Eradicate Extreme Poverty and Hunger
Priority Policies and Programs
bull Kapit-Bisig Laban sa Kahirapan (KALAHI)
bull Enrolment of 7 million beneficiaries under the National Health Insurance Program (NHIP)
bull Wholesale portfolio of the Peoplersquos Credit and Finance Corporation (PCFC)
bull Implementation of asset reform programs
bull Delivery of human development services
MDGs Amount
(in US$ million)
Share to Total MDG-
Related ODA
1 - Eradicate extreme poverty amp hunger 62594 7740
2 - Achieve universal primary education 5579 690
3 - Promote gender equality 38 005
4 - Reduce child mortality 1399 173
5 - Improve maternal health 1570 194
6 - Combat HIVAIDS malaria amp other diseases 253 031
7 - Ensure environmental sustainability 94331 1167
TOTAL 80866 10000
Summary of ODA for completed amp ongoing projects by MDG category from 2001-2005 in million US$
Source NEDA-PMS
ODA for MDGs
INVESTMENTS SUPPORTIVE OF THE MDGs 2005-2010
MDGs COST
(in PhP Billion)
1 - Eradicate extreme poverty amp hunger 129422 - Achieve universal primary education 5673 - Promote gender equality -4 - Reduce child mortality
6995 - Improve maternal health
6 - Combat HIVAIDS malaria amp other diseases
7 - Ensure environmental sustainability 19888 ndash Global partnership for development 1251
TOTAL 17447
Source NEDA-PIS
INTENSIFYING MULTISECTORAL PARTNERSHIP AND COLLABORATION
Government (executive legislature judicial)
Local Government
CSOsAcademe
Local Government
PrivateBusiness
Donor Community
Environmental Situationand Challenges
Goal 7 Ensure Environmental Sustainability
bull Forests resources and watersheds
bull Biodiversity resources
bull Coastal and marine resources
bull Air quality
bull Water resources
bull Waste and toxic chemicals
Area Proportion to Total
(Hectares) ()
7168400 100
2560872 36
Broadleaved 2448864
Mixed 24618
Coniferous 87390
4030588 56
Broadleaved 3847284
Mixed 69861
Coniferous 113443
247362 3
329578 5Source Forest Management Bureau (FMB)
Total Forest
Mangrove
Plantation
Forest Cover by Forest Type 2003
Closed Forest
Open Forest
Category
Area Reforested 1990-2003 (in hectares)Year Total
Government
Percent Non-Government
Percent
Sector
2003 15087 13195 875 1892 125
2002 25620 20682 807 4938 193
2001 31440 26524 844 4916 156
2000 27632 21740 787 5892 213
1999 42165 31183 74 10982 26
1998 42368 33219 784 9149 216
1997 66236 49301 744 16935 256
1996 46096 18869 409 27227 591
1995 65233 21841 335 43392 665
1994 49551 18032 364 31519 636
1993 19211 6347 33 12864 67
1992 40593 24304 599 16289 401
1991 93039 73602 791 19437 209
1990 191663 153949 803 37714 197
Annual Average
53995
Source DENR Annual Report
Biodiversity Resources
Philippineshellip one of the megadiverse countries in the
world higher regard for the endemism of local
species
buthellip most severely threatened of the
megadiverse countries
Coastal and Marine Resources rich sources of fish and aquatic products habitat for countless underwater wildlife natural areas for recreationtourism Water resourcesbull disparities in water supply coverage across regionsbull depletion of ground water especially in Metro
Manila and Metro Cebubull pollution of water sources
Air Qualitybull pollution remains a problem in Metro Manila and
major urban centersbull on the level of suspended particulates (TSP) air
quality is not within standards
Waste and Toxic Chemicalsbull solid waste generation in Metro Manila is estimated at
5345 tons per daybull urbanization inevitably increased the use of chemicalsbull no integrated treatment facility for hazardous waste
Priority Policies and Programs
bull Adoption of Sustainable Forest Management
bull Revised Forestry Code of the Philippines and the Watersheds Code
bull Various biodiversity acts
bull Fisheries Code and AFMA
bull Clean Air Act
Challenges and Priorities for Action
bull Sustainable and more productive utilization of natural resources
bull Focus and strengthen the protection of vulnerable and ecologically fragile areas
bull Create healthier environment for the populationbull Mitigate the occurrence of natural disasters bull Ensure environmental accountability for all
industries
CROSS-CUTTING CHALLENGEShellip
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005
Government Expenditure Program by Sector FY 2000-2005
Social Services Debt Service Economic Services General Public Services Defense
CROSSCUTTING CHALLENGES AND PRIORITIES FOR ACTION
Source DBM Budget of Expenditure and Sources of Financing
FINANCING THE MDGs
SectorYear 2001 2002 2003 2004
Economic Services 15982070 45484830 52853500 58700890
(15) (32) (33) (34)Social Services 28979110 26352690 34001700 36135990
(27) (19) (21) (21)General Public Services 63375820 69580140 73954470 78545740
(58) (49) (46) (45)Total Public Expenditures 108337000 141417660 160809670 173382620
FINANCING THE MDGs
Distribution of Public Expenditures by Local Government UnitsBy Sector 2001-2004 (in thousand pesos)
Source DBM Budget of Expenditure and Sources of Financing
CROSSCUTTING CHALLENGES AND PRIORITIES FOR ACTION
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
2001 2002 2003 2004
ODA Commitments by SectorFY 2001-2004 (US$ million)
Agriculture agrarianreform and naturalresources
Governance andinstitutionsdevelopment
Infrastructuredevelopment
Social reform anddevelopment
Industry and services
Source NEDA-PIS
CROSSCUTTING CHALLENGES AND PRIORITIES FOR ACTION
FINANCING THE MDGs
CROSS-CUTTING CHALLENGES AND
PRIORITIES FOR ACTIONbull Reduce disparities across regions
bull Increase resource allocation for MDG-related programs and projects
bull Enforce fullstricter implementation of laws amp ensure passage of MDG-supportive bills
bull Strengthen monitoring and implementation
bull Scale-up campaign for localization
bull Develop an advocacy plan
bull Intensify multisectoral partnership amp collaboration
Facilitating Factors bull Strong global support for MDGs by the United
Nations ASEAN and other multilateral organizations
bull Expanding national support among policymakers for MDGs (eg creation of the House Committee on MDGs issuance of EO on the MDGs)
bull Prioritization of MDGs in resource allocation (eg focusing of MTPIP investments on MDGs)
bull Increasing awareness and participation of private sector LGUs in MDG-related programs
Hindering Factors
bull Resource constraints (ie MDG financing gap of about $15 billion yearly)
bull Lack of support by creditors for the Debt for MDG ProjectsDebt for Equity in MDG Projects initiative
bull Low budgetary priority for MDGs accorded by some LGUs and
bull Lack of disaggregated data to monitor MDGs at local levels
Parallel Initiatives
Participation in the High-Level Plenary Meeting on MDGs
Formulation of the Plan of Action for Poverty Reduction (2006-2010)Enhance the current Poverty Reduction
Strategy and Program Framework
Advocacy for the Philippine proposal on Debt for Equity in MDG Projects
Implications on the Philippine Economy
MDG attainment would requirebull Enhanced revenue generationbull LGU private sector and civil society supportbull Expansion of microfinance services for the poorbull Pursuit of projects with high economic impactbull Right-sizing the bureaucracybull Privatization andbull Tapping OFW remittances
FIGURE 4 Percentage of Households with Less than 100 Energy Adequacy
FIGURE 5 Percentage of Underweight Children 0-5 Year Olds
Meeting Goal 1 Eradicate Extreme Poverty and Hunger
Priority Policies and Programs
bull Kapit-Bisig Laban sa Kahirapan (KALAHI)
bull Enrolment of 7 million beneficiaries under the National Health Insurance Program (NHIP)
bull Wholesale portfolio of the Peoplersquos Credit and Finance Corporation (PCFC)
bull Implementation of asset reform programs
bull Delivery of human development services
MDGs Amount
(in US$ million)
Share to Total MDG-
Related ODA
1 - Eradicate extreme poverty amp hunger 62594 7740
2 - Achieve universal primary education 5579 690
3 - Promote gender equality 38 005
4 - Reduce child mortality 1399 173
5 - Improve maternal health 1570 194
6 - Combat HIVAIDS malaria amp other diseases 253 031
7 - Ensure environmental sustainability 94331 1167
TOTAL 80866 10000
Summary of ODA for completed amp ongoing projects by MDG category from 2001-2005 in million US$
Source NEDA-PMS
ODA for MDGs
INVESTMENTS SUPPORTIVE OF THE MDGs 2005-2010
MDGs COST
(in PhP Billion)
1 - Eradicate extreme poverty amp hunger 129422 - Achieve universal primary education 5673 - Promote gender equality -4 - Reduce child mortality
6995 - Improve maternal health
6 - Combat HIVAIDS malaria amp other diseases
7 - Ensure environmental sustainability 19888 ndash Global partnership for development 1251
TOTAL 17447
Source NEDA-PIS
INTENSIFYING MULTISECTORAL PARTNERSHIP AND COLLABORATION
Government (executive legislature judicial)
Local Government
CSOsAcademe
Local Government
PrivateBusiness
Donor Community
Environmental Situationand Challenges
Goal 7 Ensure Environmental Sustainability
bull Forests resources and watersheds
bull Biodiversity resources
bull Coastal and marine resources
bull Air quality
bull Water resources
bull Waste and toxic chemicals
Area Proportion to Total
(Hectares) ()
7168400 100
2560872 36
Broadleaved 2448864
Mixed 24618
Coniferous 87390
4030588 56
Broadleaved 3847284
Mixed 69861
Coniferous 113443
247362 3
329578 5Source Forest Management Bureau (FMB)
Total Forest
Mangrove
Plantation
Forest Cover by Forest Type 2003
Closed Forest
Open Forest
Category
Area Reforested 1990-2003 (in hectares)Year Total
Government
Percent Non-Government
Percent
Sector
2003 15087 13195 875 1892 125
2002 25620 20682 807 4938 193
2001 31440 26524 844 4916 156
2000 27632 21740 787 5892 213
1999 42165 31183 74 10982 26
1998 42368 33219 784 9149 216
1997 66236 49301 744 16935 256
1996 46096 18869 409 27227 591
1995 65233 21841 335 43392 665
1994 49551 18032 364 31519 636
1993 19211 6347 33 12864 67
1992 40593 24304 599 16289 401
1991 93039 73602 791 19437 209
1990 191663 153949 803 37714 197
Annual Average
53995
Source DENR Annual Report
Biodiversity Resources
Philippineshellip one of the megadiverse countries in the
world higher regard for the endemism of local
species
buthellip most severely threatened of the
megadiverse countries
Coastal and Marine Resources rich sources of fish and aquatic products habitat for countless underwater wildlife natural areas for recreationtourism Water resourcesbull disparities in water supply coverage across regionsbull depletion of ground water especially in Metro
Manila and Metro Cebubull pollution of water sources
Air Qualitybull pollution remains a problem in Metro Manila and
major urban centersbull on the level of suspended particulates (TSP) air
quality is not within standards
Waste and Toxic Chemicalsbull solid waste generation in Metro Manila is estimated at
5345 tons per daybull urbanization inevitably increased the use of chemicalsbull no integrated treatment facility for hazardous waste
Priority Policies and Programs
bull Adoption of Sustainable Forest Management
bull Revised Forestry Code of the Philippines and the Watersheds Code
bull Various biodiversity acts
bull Fisheries Code and AFMA
bull Clean Air Act
Challenges and Priorities for Action
bull Sustainable and more productive utilization of natural resources
bull Focus and strengthen the protection of vulnerable and ecologically fragile areas
bull Create healthier environment for the populationbull Mitigate the occurrence of natural disasters bull Ensure environmental accountability for all
industries
CROSS-CUTTING CHALLENGEShellip
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005
Government Expenditure Program by Sector FY 2000-2005
Social Services Debt Service Economic Services General Public Services Defense
CROSSCUTTING CHALLENGES AND PRIORITIES FOR ACTION
Source DBM Budget of Expenditure and Sources of Financing
FINANCING THE MDGs
SectorYear 2001 2002 2003 2004
Economic Services 15982070 45484830 52853500 58700890
(15) (32) (33) (34)Social Services 28979110 26352690 34001700 36135990
(27) (19) (21) (21)General Public Services 63375820 69580140 73954470 78545740
(58) (49) (46) (45)Total Public Expenditures 108337000 141417660 160809670 173382620
FINANCING THE MDGs
Distribution of Public Expenditures by Local Government UnitsBy Sector 2001-2004 (in thousand pesos)
Source DBM Budget of Expenditure and Sources of Financing
CROSSCUTTING CHALLENGES AND PRIORITIES FOR ACTION
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
2001 2002 2003 2004
ODA Commitments by SectorFY 2001-2004 (US$ million)
Agriculture agrarianreform and naturalresources
Governance andinstitutionsdevelopment
Infrastructuredevelopment
Social reform anddevelopment
Industry and services
Source NEDA-PIS
CROSSCUTTING CHALLENGES AND PRIORITIES FOR ACTION
FINANCING THE MDGs
CROSS-CUTTING CHALLENGES AND
PRIORITIES FOR ACTIONbull Reduce disparities across regions
bull Increase resource allocation for MDG-related programs and projects
bull Enforce fullstricter implementation of laws amp ensure passage of MDG-supportive bills
bull Strengthen monitoring and implementation
bull Scale-up campaign for localization
bull Develop an advocacy plan
bull Intensify multisectoral partnership amp collaboration
Facilitating Factors bull Strong global support for MDGs by the United
Nations ASEAN and other multilateral organizations
bull Expanding national support among policymakers for MDGs (eg creation of the House Committee on MDGs issuance of EO on the MDGs)
bull Prioritization of MDGs in resource allocation (eg focusing of MTPIP investments on MDGs)
bull Increasing awareness and participation of private sector LGUs in MDG-related programs
Hindering Factors
bull Resource constraints (ie MDG financing gap of about $15 billion yearly)
bull Lack of support by creditors for the Debt for MDG ProjectsDebt for Equity in MDG Projects initiative
bull Low budgetary priority for MDGs accorded by some LGUs and
bull Lack of disaggregated data to monitor MDGs at local levels
Parallel Initiatives
Participation in the High-Level Plenary Meeting on MDGs
Formulation of the Plan of Action for Poverty Reduction (2006-2010)Enhance the current Poverty Reduction
Strategy and Program Framework
Advocacy for the Philippine proposal on Debt for Equity in MDG Projects
Implications on the Philippine Economy
MDG attainment would requirebull Enhanced revenue generationbull LGU private sector and civil society supportbull Expansion of microfinance services for the poorbull Pursuit of projects with high economic impactbull Right-sizing the bureaucracybull Privatization andbull Tapping OFW remittances
FIGURE 5 Percentage of Underweight Children 0-5 Year Olds
Meeting Goal 1 Eradicate Extreme Poverty and Hunger
Priority Policies and Programs
bull Kapit-Bisig Laban sa Kahirapan (KALAHI)
bull Enrolment of 7 million beneficiaries under the National Health Insurance Program (NHIP)
bull Wholesale portfolio of the Peoplersquos Credit and Finance Corporation (PCFC)
bull Implementation of asset reform programs
bull Delivery of human development services
MDGs Amount
(in US$ million)
Share to Total MDG-
Related ODA
1 - Eradicate extreme poverty amp hunger 62594 7740
2 - Achieve universal primary education 5579 690
3 - Promote gender equality 38 005
4 - Reduce child mortality 1399 173
5 - Improve maternal health 1570 194
6 - Combat HIVAIDS malaria amp other diseases 253 031
7 - Ensure environmental sustainability 94331 1167
TOTAL 80866 10000
Summary of ODA for completed amp ongoing projects by MDG category from 2001-2005 in million US$
Source NEDA-PMS
ODA for MDGs
INVESTMENTS SUPPORTIVE OF THE MDGs 2005-2010
MDGs COST
(in PhP Billion)
1 - Eradicate extreme poverty amp hunger 129422 - Achieve universal primary education 5673 - Promote gender equality -4 - Reduce child mortality
6995 - Improve maternal health
6 - Combat HIVAIDS malaria amp other diseases
7 - Ensure environmental sustainability 19888 ndash Global partnership for development 1251
TOTAL 17447
Source NEDA-PIS
INTENSIFYING MULTISECTORAL PARTNERSHIP AND COLLABORATION
Government (executive legislature judicial)
Local Government
CSOsAcademe
Local Government
PrivateBusiness
Donor Community
Environmental Situationand Challenges
Goal 7 Ensure Environmental Sustainability
bull Forests resources and watersheds
bull Biodiversity resources
bull Coastal and marine resources
bull Air quality
bull Water resources
bull Waste and toxic chemicals
Area Proportion to Total
(Hectares) ()
7168400 100
2560872 36
Broadleaved 2448864
Mixed 24618
Coniferous 87390
4030588 56
Broadleaved 3847284
Mixed 69861
Coniferous 113443
247362 3
329578 5Source Forest Management Bureau (FMB)
Total Forest
Mangrove
Plantation
Forest Cover by Forest Type 2003
Closed Forest
Open Forest
Category
Area Reforested 1990-2003 (in hectares)Year Total
Government
Percent Non-Government
Percent
Sector
2003 15087 13195 875 1892 125
2002 25620 20682 807 4938 193
2001 31440 26524 844 4916 156
2000 27632 21740 787 5892 213
1999 42165 31183 74 10982 26
1998 42368 33219 784 9149 216
1997 66236 49301 744 16935 256
1996 46096 18869 409 27227 591
1995 65233 21841 335 43392 665
1994 49551 18032 364 31519 636
1993 19211 6347 33 12864 67
1992 40593 24304 599 16289 401
1991 93039 73602 791 19437 209
1990 191663 153949 803 37714 197
Annual Average
53995
Source DENR Annual Report
Biodiversity Resources
Philippineshellip one of the megadiverse countries in the
world higher regard for the endemism of local
species
buthellip most severely threatened of the
megadiverse countries
Coastal and Marine Resources rich sources of fish and aquatic products habitat for countless underwater wildlife natural areas for recreationtourism Water resourcesbull disparities in water supply coverage across regionsbull depletion of ground water especially in Metro
Manila and Metro Cebubull pollution of water sources
Air Qualitybull pollution remains a problem in Metro Manila and
major urban centersbull on the level of suspended particulates (TSP) air
quality is not within standards
Waste and Toxic Chemicalsbull solid waste generation in Metro Manila is estimated at
5345 tons per daybull urbanization inevitably increased the use of chemicalsbull no integrated treatment facility for hazardous waste
Priority Policies and Programs
bull Adoption of Sustainable Forest Management
bull Revised Forestry Code of the Philippines and the Watersheds Code
bull Various biodiversity acts
bull Fisheries Code and AFMA
bull Clean Air Act
Challenges and Priorities for Action
bull Sustainable and more productive utilization of natural resources
bull Focus and strengthen the protection of vulnerable and ecologically fragile areas
bull Create healthier environment for the populationbull Mitigate the occurrence of natural disasters bull Ensure environmental accountability for all
industries
CROSS-CUTTING CHALLENGEShellip
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005
Government Expenditure Program by Sector FY 2000-2005
Social Services Debt Service Economic Services General Public Services Defense
CROSSCUTTING CHALLENGES AND PRIORITIES FOR ACTION
Source DBM Budget of Expenditure and Sources of Financing
FINANCING THE MDGs
SectorYear 2001 2002 2003 2004
Economic Services 15982070 45484830 52853500 58700890
(15) (32) (33) (34)Social Services 28979110 26352690 34001700 36135990
(27) (19) (21) (21)General Public Services 63375820 69580140 73954470 78545740
(58) (49) (46) (45)Total Public Expenditures 108337000 141417660 160809670 173382620
FINANCING THE MDGs
Distribution of Public Expenditures by Local Government UnitsBy Sector 2001-2004 (in thousand pesos)
Source DBM Budget of Expenditure and Sources of Financing
CROSSCUTTING CHALLENGES AND PRIORITIES FOR ACTION
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
2001 2002 2003 2004
ODA Commitments by SectorFY 2001-2004 (US$ million)
Agriculture agrarianreform and naturalresources
Governance andinstitutionsdevelopment
Infrastructuredevelopment
Social reform anddevelopment
Industry and services
Source NEDA-PIS
CROSSCUTTING CHALLENGES AND PRIORITIES FOR ACTION
FINANCING THE MDGs
CROSS-CUTTING CHALLENGES AND
PRIORITIES FOR ACTIONbull Reduce disparities across regions
bull Increase resource allocation for MDG-related programs and projects
bull Enforce fullstricter implementation of laws amp ensure passage of MDG-supportive bills
bull Strengthen monitoring and implementation
bull Scale-up campaign for localization
bull Develop an advocacy plan
bull Intensify multisectoral partnership amp collaboration
Facilitating Factors bull Strong global support for MDGs by the United
Nations ASEAN and other multilateral organizations
bull Expanding national support among policymakers for MDGs (eg creation of the House Committee on MDGs issuance of EO on the MDGs)
bull Prioritization of MDGs in resource allocation (eg focusing of MTPIP investments on MDGs)
bull Increasing awareness and participation of private sector LGUs in MDG-related programs
Hindering Factors
bull Resource constraints (ie MDG financing gap of about $15 billion yearly)
bull Lack of support by creditors for the Debt for MDG ProjectsDebt for Equity in MDG Projects initiative
bull Low budgetary priority for MDGs accorded by some LGUs and
bull Lack of disaggregated data to monitor MDGs at local levels
Parallel Initiatives
Participation in the High-Level Plenary Meeting on MDGs
Formulation of the Plan of Action for Poverty Reduction (2006-2010)Enhance the current Poverty Reduction
Strategy and Program Framework
Advocacy for the Philippine proposal on Debt for Equity in MDG Projects
Implications on the Philippine Economy
MDG attainment would requirebull Enhanced revenue generationbull LGU private sector and civil society supportbull Expansion of microfinance services for the poorbull Pursuit of projects with high economic impactbull Right-sizing the bureaucracybull Privatization andbull Tapping OFW remittances
Meeting Goal 1 Eradicate Extreme Poverty and Hunger
Priority Policies and Programs
bull Kapit-Bisig Laban sa Kahirapan (KALAHI)
bull Enrolment of 7 million beneficiaries under the National Health Insurance Program (NHIP)
bull Wholesale portfolio of the Peoplersquos Credit and Finance Corporation (PCFC)
bull Implementation of asset reform programs
bull Delivery of human development services
MDGs Amount
(in US$ million)
Share to Total MDG-
Related ODA
1 - Eradicate extreme poverty amp hunger 62594 7740
2 - Achieve universal primary education 5579 690
3 - Promote gender equality 38 005
4 - Reduce child mortality 1399 173
5 - Improve maternal health 1570 194
6 - Combat HIVAIDS malaria amp other diseases 253 031
7 - Ensure environmental sustainability 94331 1167
TOTAL 80866 10000
Summary of ODA for completed amp ongoing projects by MDG category from 2001-2005 in million US$
Source NEDA-PMS
ODA for MDGs
INVESTMENTS SUPPORTIVE OF THE MDGs 2005-2010
MDGs COST
(in PhP Billion)
1 - Eradicate extreme poverty amp hunger 129422 - Achieve universal primary education 5673 - Promote gender equality -4 - Reduce child mortality
6995 - Improve maternal health
6 - Combat HIVAIDS malaria amp other diseases
7 - Ensure environmental sustainability 19888 ndash Global partnership for development 1251
TOTAL 17447
Source NEDA-PIS
INTENSIFYING MULTISECTORAL PARTNERSHIP AND COLLABORATION
Government (executive legislature judicial)
Local Government
CSOsAcademe
Local Government
PrivateBusiness
Donor Community
Environmental Situationand Challenges
Goal 7 Ensure Environmental Sustainability
bull Forests resources and watersheds
bull Biodiversity resources
bull Coastal and marine resources
bull Air quality
bull Water resources
bull Waste and toxic chemicals
Area Proportion to Total
(Hectares) ()
7168400 100
2560872 36
Broadleaved 2448864
Mixed 24618
Coniferous 87390
4030588 56
Broadleaved 3847284
Mixed 69861
Coniferous 113443
247362 3
329578 5Source Forest Management Bureau (FMB)
Total Forest
Mangrove
Plantation
Forest Cover by Forest Type 2003
Closed Forest
Open Forest
Category
Area Reforested 1990-2003 (in hectares)Year Total
Government
Percent Non-Government
Percent
Sector
2003 15087 13195 875 1892 125
2002 25620 20682 807 4938 193
2001 31440 26524 844 4916 156
2000 27632 21740 787 5892 213
1999 42165 31183 74 10982 26
1998 42368 33219 784 9149 216
1997 66236 49301 744 16935 256
1996 46096 18869 409 27227 591
1995 65233 21841 335 43392 665
1994 49551 18032 364 31519 636
1993 19211 6347 33 12864 67
1992 40593 24304 599 16289 401
1991 93039 73602 791 19437 209
1990 191663 153949 803 37714 197
Annual Average
53995
Source DENR Annual Report
Biodiversity Resources
Philippineshellip one of the megadiverse countries in the
world higher regard for the endemism of local
species
buthellip most severely threatened of the
megadiverse countries
Coastal and Marine Resources rich sources of fish and aquatic products habitat for countless underwater wildlife natural areas for recreationtourism Water resourcesbull disparities in water supply coverage across regionsbull depletion of ground water especially in Metro
Manila and Metro Cebubull pollution of water sources
Air Qualitybull pollution remains a problem in Metro Manila and
major urban centersbull on the level of suspended particulates (TSP) air
quality is not within standards
Waste and Toxic Chemicalsbull solid waste generation in Metro Manila is estimated at
5345 tons per daybull urbanization inevitably increased the use of chemicalsbull no integrated treatment facility for hazardous waste
Priority Policies and Programs
bull Adoption of Sustainable Forest Management
bull Revised Forestry Code of the Philippines and the Watersheds Code
bull Various biodiversity acts
bull Fisheries Code and AFMA
bull Clean Air Act
Challenges and Priorities for Action
bull Sustainable and more productive utilization of natural resources
bull Focus and strengthen the protection of vulnerable and ecologically fragile areas
bull Create healthier environment for the populationbull Mitigate the occurrence of natural disasters bull Ensure environmental accountability for all
industries
CROSS-CUTTING CHALLENGEShellip
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005
Government Expenditure Program by Sector FY 2000-2005
Social Services Debt Service Economic Services General Public Services Defense
CROSSCUTTING CHALLENGES AND PRIORITIES FOR ACTION
Source DBM Budget of Expenditure and Sources of Financing
FINANCING THE MDGs
SectorYear 2001 2002 2003 2004
Economic Services 15982070 45484830 52853500 58700890
(15) (32) (33) (34)Social Services 28979110 26352690 34001700 36135990
(27) (19) (21) (21)General Public Services 63375820 69580140 73954470 78545740
(58) (49) (46) (45)Total Public Expenditures 108337000 141417660 160809670 173382620
FINANCING THE MDGs
Distribution of Public Expenditures by Local Government UnitsBy Sector 2001-2004 (in thousand pesos)
Source DBM Budget of Expenditure and Sources of Financing
CROSSCUTTING CHALLENGES AND PRIORITIES FOR ACTION
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
2001 2002 2003 2004
ODA Commitments by SectorFY 2001-2004 (US$ million)
Agriculture agrarianreform and naturalresources
Governance andinstitutionsdevelopment
Infrastructuredevelopment
Social reform anddevelopment
Industry and services
Source NEDA-PIS
CROSSCUTTING CHALLENGES AND PRIORITIES FOR ACTION
FINANCING THE MDGs
CROSS-CUTTING CHALLENGES AND
PRIORITIES FOR ACTIONbull Reduce disparities across regions
bull Increase resource allocation for MDG-related programs and projects
bull Enforce fullstricter implementation of laws amp ensure passage of MDG-supportive bills
bull Strengthen monitoring and implementation
bull Scale-up campaign for localization
bull Develop an advocacy plan
bull Intensify multisectoral partnership amp collaboration
Facilitating Factors bull Strong global support for MDGs by the United
Nations ASEAN and other multilateral organizations
bull Expanding national support among policymakers for MDGs (eg creation of the House Committee on MDGs issuance of EO on the MDGs)
bull Prioritization of MDGs in resource allocation (eg focusing of MTPIP investments on MDGs)
bull Increasing awareness and participation of private sector LGUs in MDG-related programs
Hindering Factors
bull Resource constraints (ie MDG financing gap of about $15 billion yearly)
bull Lack of support by creditors for the Debt for MDG ProjectsDebt for Equity in MDG Projects initiative
bull Low budgetary priority for MDGs accorded by some LGUs and
bull Lack of disaggregated data to monitor MDGs at local levels
Parallel Initiatives
Participation in the High-Level Plenary Meeting on MDGs
Formulation of the Plan of Action for Poverty Reduction (2006-2010)Enhance the current Poverty Reduction
Strategy and Program Framework
Advocacy for the Philippine proposal on Debt for Equity in MDG Projects
Implications on the Philippine Economy
MDG attainment would requirebull Enhanced revenue generationbull LGU private sector and civil society supportbull Expansion of microfinance services for the poorbull Pursuit of projects with high economic impactbull Right-sizing the bureaucracybull Privatization andbull Tapping OFW remittances
Priority Policies and Programs
bull Kapit-Bisig Laban sa Kahirapan (KALAHI)
bull Enrolment of 7 million beneficiaries under the National Health Insurance Program (NHIP)
bull Wholesale portfolio of the Peoplersquos Credit and Finance Corporation (PCFC)
bull Implementation of asset reform programs
bull Delivery of human development services
MDGs Amount
(in US$ million)
Share to Total MDG-
Related ODA
1 - Eradicate extreme poverty amp hunger 62594 7740
2 - Achieve universal primary education 5579 690
3 - Promote gender equality 38 005
4 - Reduce child mortality 1399 173
5 - Improve maternal health 1570 194
6 - Combat HIVAIDS malaria amp other diseases 253 031
7 - Ensure environmental sustainability 94331 1167
TOTAL 80866 10000
Summary of ODA for completed amp ongoing projects by MDG category from 2001-2005 in million US$
Source NEDA-PMS
ODA for MDGs
INVESTMENTS SUPPORTIVE OF THE MDGs 2005-2010
MDGs COST
(in PhP Billion)
1 - Eradicate extreme poverty amp hunger 129422 - Achieve universal primary education 5673 - Promote gender equality -4 - Reduce child mortality
6995 - Improve maternal health
6 - Combat HIVAIDS malaria amp other diseases
7 - Ensure environmental sustainability 19888 ndash Global partnership for development 1251
TOTAL 17447
Source NEDA-PIS
INTENSIFYING MULTISECTORAL PARTNERSHIP AND COLLABORATION
Government (executive legislature judicial)
Local Government
CSOsAcademe
Local Government
PrivateBusiness
Donor Community
Environmental Situationand Challenges
Goal 7 Ensure Environmental Sustainability
bull Forests resources and watersheds
bull Biodiversity resources
bull Coastal and marine resources
bull Air quality
bull Water resources
bull Waste and toxic chemicals
Area Proportion to Total
(Hectares) ()
7168400 100
2560872 36
Broadleaved 2448864
Mixed 24618
Coniferous 87390
4030588 56
Broadleaved 3847284
Mixed 69861
Coniferous 113443
247362 3
329578 5Source Forest Management Bureau (FMB)
Total Forest
Mangrove
Plantation
Forest Cover by Forest Type 2003
Closed Forest
Open Forest
Category
Area Reforested 1990-2003 (in hectares)Year Total
Government
Percent Non-Government
Percent
Sector
2003 15087 13195 875 1892 125
2002 25620 20682 807 4938 193
2001 31440 26524 844 4916 156
2000 27632 21740 787 5892 213
1999 42165 31183 74 10982 26
1998 42368 33219 784 9149 216
1997 66236 49301 744 16935 256
1996 46096 18869 409 27227 591
1995 65233 21841 335 43392 665
1994 49551 18032 364 31519 636
1993 19211 6347 33 12864 67
1992 40593 24304 599 16289 401
1991 93039 73602 791 19437 209
1990 191663 153949 803 37714 197
Annual Average
53995
Source DENR Annual Report
Biodiversity Resources
Philippineshellip one of the megadiverse countries in the
world higher regard for the endemism of local
species
buthellip most severely threatened of the
megadiverse countries
Coastal and Marine Resources rich sources of fish and aquatic products habitat for countless underwater wildlife natural areas for recreationtourism Water resourcesbull disparities in water supply coverage across regionsbull depletion of ground water especially in Metro
Manila and Metro Cebubull pollution of water sources
Air Qualitybull pollution remains a problem in Metro Manila and
major urban centersbull on the level of suspended particulates (TSP) air
quality is not within standards
Waste and Toxic Chemicalsbull solid waste generation in Metro Manila is estimated at
5345 tons per daybull urbanization inevitably increased the use of chemicalsbull no integrated treatment facility for hazardous waste
Priority Policies and Programs
bull Adoption of Sustainable Forest Management
bull Revised Forestry Code of the Philippines and the Watersheds Code
bull Various biodiversity acts
bull Fisheries Code and AFMA
bull Clean Air Act
Challenges and Priorities for Action
bull Sustainable and more productive utilization of natural resources
bull Focus and strengthen the protection of vulnerable and ecologically fragile areas
bull Create healthier environment for the populationbull Mitigate the occurrence of natural disasters bull Ensure environmental accountability for all
industries
CROSS-CUTTING CHALLENGEShellip
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005
Government Expenditure Program by Sector FY 2000-2005
Social Services Debt Service Economic Services General Public Services Defense
CROSSCUTTING CHALLENGES AND PRIORITIES FOR ACTION
Source DBM Budget of Expenditure and Sources of Financing
FINANCING THE MDGs
SectorYear 2001 2002 2003 2004
Economic Services 15982070 45484830 52853500 58700890
(15) (32) (33) (34)Social Services 28979110 26352690 34001700 36135990
(27) (19) (21) (21)General Public Services 63375820 69580140 73954470 78545740
(58) (49) (46) (45)Total Public Expenditures 108337000 141417660 160809670 173382620
FINANCING THE MDGs
Distribution of Public Expenditures by Local Government UnitsBy Sector 2001-2004 (in thousand pesos)
Source DBM Budget of Expenditure and Sources of Financing
CROSSCUTTING CHALLENGES AND PRIORITIES FOR ACTION
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
2001 2002 2003 2004
ODA Commitments by SectorFY 2001-2004 (US$ million)
Agriculture agrarianreform and naturalresources
Governance andinstitutionsdevelopment
Infrastructuredevelopment
Social reform anddevelopment
Industry and services
Source NEDA-PIS
CROSSCUTTING CHALLENGES AND PRIORITIES FOR ACTION
FINANCING THE MDGs
CROSS-CUTTING CHALLENGES AND
PRIORITIES FOR ACTIONbull Reduce disparities across regions
bull Increase resource allocation for MDG-related programs and projects
bull Enforce fullstricter implementation of laws amp ensure passage of MDG-supportive bills
bull Strengthen monitoring and implementation
bull Scale-up campaign for localization
bull Develop an advocacy plan
bull Intensify multisectoral partnership amp collaboration
Facilitating Factors bull Strong global support for MDGs by the United
Nations ASEAN and other multilateral organizations
bull Expanding national support among policymakers for MDGs (eg creation of the House Committee on MDGs issuance of EO on the MDGs)
bull Prioritization of MDGs in resource allocation (eg focusing of MTPIP investments on MDGs)
bull Increasing awareness and participation of private sector LGUs in MDG-related programs
Hindering Factors
bull Resource constraints (ie MDG financing gap of about $15 billion yearly)
bull Lack of support by creditors for the Debt for MDG ProjectsDebt for Equity in MDG Projects initiative
bull Low budgetary priority for MDGs accorded by some LGUs and
bull Lack of disaggregated data to monitor MDGs at local levels
Parallel Initiatives
Participation in the High-Level Plenary Meeting on MDGs
Formulation of the Plan of Action for Poverty Reduction (2006-2010)Enhance the current Poverty Reduction
Strategy and Program Framework
Advocacy for the Philippine proposal on Debt for Equity in MDG Projects
Implications on the Philippine Economy
MDG attainment would requirebull Enhanced revenue generationbull LGU private sector and civil society supportbull Expansion of microfinance services for the poorbull Pursuit of projects with high economic impactbull Right-sizing the bureaucracybull Privatization andbull Tapping OFW remittances
MDGs Amount
(in US$ million)
Share to Total MDG-
Related ODA
1 - Eradicate extreme poverty amp hunger 62594 7740
2 - Achieve universal primary education 5579 690
3 - Promote gender equality 38 005
4 - Reduce child mortality 1399 173
5 - Improve maternal health 1570 194
6 - Combat HIVAIDS malaria amp other diseases 253 031
7 - Ensure environmental sustainability 94331 1167
TOTAL 80866 10000
Summary of ODA for completed amp ongoing projects by MDG category from 2001-2005 in million US$
Source NEDA-PMS
ODA for MDGs
INVESTMENTS SUPPORTIVE OF THE MDGs 2005-2010
MDGs COST
(in PhP Billion)
1 - Eradicate extreme poverty amp hunger 129422 - Achieve universal primary education 5673 - Promote gender equality -4 - Reduce child mortality
6995 - Improve maternal health
6 - Combat HIVAIDS malaria amp other diseases
7 - Ensure environmental sustainability 19888 ndash Global partnership for development 1251
TOTAL 17447
Source NEDA-PIS
INTENSIFYING MULTISECTORAL PARTNERSHIP AND COLLABORATION
Government (executive legislature judicial)
Local Government
CSOsAcademe
Local Government
PrivateBusiness
Donor Community
Environmental Situationand Challenges
Goal 7 Ensure Environmental Sustainability
bull Forests resources and watersheds
bull Biodiversity resources
bull Coastal and marine resources
bull Air quality
bull Water resources
bull Waste and toxic chemicals
Area Proportion to Total
(Hectares) ()
7168400 100
2560872 36
Broadleaved 2448864
Mixed 24618
Coniferous 87390
4030588 56
Broadleaved 3847284
Mixed 69861
Coniferous 113443
247362 3
329578 5Source Forest Management Bureau (FMB)
Total Forest
Mangrove
Plantation
Forest Cover by Forest Type 2003
Closed Forest
Open Forest
Category
Area Reforested 1990-2003 (in hectares)Year Total
Government
Percent Non-Government
Percent
Sector
2003 15087 13195 875 1892 125
2002 25620 20682 807 4938 193
2001 31440 26524 844 4916 156
2000 27632 21740 787 5892 213
1999 42165 31183 74 10982 26
1998 42368 33219 784 9149 216
1997 66236 49301 744 16935 256
1996 46096 18869 409 27227 591
1995 65233 21841 335 43392 665
1994 49551 18032 364 31519 636
1993 19211 6347 33 12864 67
1992 40593 24304 599 16289 401
1991 93039 73602 791 19437 209
1990 191663 153949 803 37714 197
Annual Average
53995
Source DENR Annual Report
Biodiversity Resources
Philippineshellip one of the megadiverse countries in the
world higher regard for the endemism of local
species
buthellip most severely threatened of the
megadiverse countries
Coastal and Marine Resources rich sources of fish and aquatic products habitat for countless underwater wildlife natural areas for recreationtourism Water resourcesbull disparities in water supply coverage across regionsbull depletion of ground water especially in Metro
Manila and Metro Cebubull pollution of water sources
Air Qualitybull pollution remains a problem in Metro Manila and
major urban centersbull on the level of suspended particulates (TSP) air
quality is not within standards
Waste and Toxic Chemicalsbull solid waste generation in Metro Manila is estimated at
5345 tons per daybull urbanization inevitably increased the use of chemicalsbull no integrated treatment facility for hazardous waste
Priority Policies and Programs
bull Adoption of Sustainable Forest Management
bull Revised Forestry Code of the Philippines and the Watersheds Code
bull Various biodiversity acts
bull Fisheries Code and AFMA
bull Clean Air Act
Challenges and Priorities for Action
bull Sustainable and more productive utilization of natural resources
bull Focus and strengthen the protection of vulnerable and ecologically fragile areas
bull Create healthier environment for the populationbull Mitigate the occurrence of natural disasters bull Ensure environmental accountability for all
industries
CROSS-CUTTING CHALLENGEShellip
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005
Government Expenditure Program by Sector FY 2000-2005
Social Services Debt Service Economic Services General Public Services Defense
CROSSCUTTING CHALLENGES AND PRIORITIES FOR ACTION
Source DBM Budget of Expenditure and Sources of Financing
FINANCING THE MDGs
SectorYear 2001 2002 2003 2004
Economic Services 15982070 45484830 52853500 58700890
(15) (32) (33) (34)Social Services 28979110 26352690 34001700 36135990
(27) (19) (21) (21)General Public Services 63375820 69580140 73954470 78545740
(58) (49) (46) (45)Total Public Expenditures 108337000 141417660 160809670 173382620
FINANCING THE MDGs
Distribution of Public Expenditures by Local Government UnitsBy Sector 2001-2004 (in thousand pesos)
Source DBM Budget of Expenditure and Sources of Financing
CROSSCUTTING CHALLENGES AND PRIORITIES FOR ACTION
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
2001 2002 2003 2004
ODA Commitments by SectorFY 2001-2004 (US$ million)
Agriculture agrarianreform and naturalresources
Governance andinstitutionsdevelopment
Infrastructuredevelopment
Social reform anddevelopment
Industry and services
Source NEDA-PIS
CROSSCUTTING CHALLENGES AND PRIORITIES FOR ACTION
FINANCING THE MDGs
CROSS-CUTTING CHALLENGES AND
PRIORITIES FOR ACTIONbull Reduce disparities across regions
bull Increase resource allocation for MDG-related programs and projects
bull Enforce fullstricter implementation of laws amp ensure passage of MDG-supportive bills
bull Strengthen monitoring and implementation
bull Scale-up campaign for localization
bull Develop an advocacy plan
bull Intensify multisectoral partnership amp collaboration
Facilitating Factors bull Strong global support for MDGs by the United
Nations ASEAN and other multilateral organizations
bull Expanding national support among policymakers for MDGs (eg creation of the House Committee on MDGs issuance of EO on the MDGs)
bull Prioritization of MDGs in resource allocation (eg focusing of MTPIP investments on MDGs)
bull Increasing awareness and participation of private sector LGUs in MDG-related programs
Hindering Factors
bull Resource constraints (ie MDG financing gap of about $15 billion yearly)
bull Lack of support by creditors for the Debt for MDG ProjectsDebt for Equity in MDG Projects initiative
bull Low budgetary priority for MDGs accorded by some LGUs and
bull Lack of disaggregated data to monitor MDGs at local levels
Parallel Initiatives
Participation in the High-Level Plenary Meeting on MDGs
Formulation of the Plan of Action for Poverty Reduction (2006-2010)Enhance the current Poverty Reduction
Strategy and Program Framework
Advocacy for the Philippine proposal on Debt for Equity in MDG Projects
Implications on the Philippine Economy
MDG attainment would requirebull Enhanced revenue generationbull LGU private sector and civil society supportbull Expansion of microfinance services for the poorbull Pursuit of projects with high economic impactbull Right-sizing the bureaucracybull Privatization andbull Tapping OFW remittances
INVESTMENTS SUPPORTIVE OF THE MDGs 2005-2010
MDGs COST
(in PhP Billion)
1 - Eradicate extreme poverty amp hunger 129422 - Achieve universal primary education 5673 - Promote gender equality -4 - Reduce child mortality
6995 - Improve maternal health
6 - Combat HIVAIDS malaria amp other diseases
7 - Ensure environmental sustainability 19888 ndash Global partnership for development 1251
TOTAL 17447
Source NEDA-PIS
INTENSIFYING MULTISECTORAL PARTNERSHIP AND COLLABORATION
Government (executive legislature judicial)
Local Government
CSOsAcademe
Local Government
PrivateBusiness
Donor Community
Environmental Situationand Challenges
Goal 7 Ensure Environmental Sustainability
bull Forests resources and watersheds
bull Biodiversity resources
bull Coastal and marine resources
bull Air quality
bull Water resources
bull Waste and toxic chemicals
Area Proportion to Total
(Hectares) ()
7168400 100
2560872 36
Broadleaved 2448864
Mixed 24618
Coniferous 87390
4030588 56
Broadleaved 3847284
Mixed 69861
Coniferous 113443
247362 3
329578 5Source Forest Management Bureau (FMB)
Total Forest
Mangrove
Plantation
Forest Cover by Forest Type 2003
Closed Forest
Open Forest
Category
Area Reforested 1990-2003 (in hectares)Year Total
Government
Percent Non-Government
Percent
Sector
2003 15087 13195 875 1892 125
2002 25620 20682 807 4938 193
2001 31440 26524 844 4916 156
2000 27632 21740 787 5892 213
1999 42165 31183 74 10982 26
1998 42368 33219 784 9149 216
1997 66236 49301 744 16935 256
1996 46096 18869 409 27227 591
1995 65233 21841 335 43392 665
1994 49551 18032 364 31519 636
1993 19211 6347 33 12864 67
1992 40593 24304 599 16289 401
1991 93039 73602 791 19437 209
1990 191663 153949 803 37714 197
Annual Average
53995
Source DENR Annual Report
Biodiversity Resources
Philippineshellip one of the megadiverse countries in the
world higher regard for the endemism of local
species
buthellip most severely threatened of the
megadiverse countries
Coastal and Marine Resources rich sources of fish and aquatic products habitat for countless underwater wildlife natural areas for recreationtourism Water resourcesbull disparities in water supply coverage across regionsbull depletion of ground water especially in Metro
Manila and Metro Cebubull pollution of water sources
Air Qualitybull pollution remains a problem in Metro Manila and
major urban centersbull on the level of suspended particulates (TSP) air
quality is not within standards
Waste and Toxic Chemicalsbull solid waste generation in Metro Manila is estimated at
5345 tons per daybull urbanization inevitably increased the use of chemicalsbull no integrated treatment facility for hazardous waste
Priority Policies and Programs
bull Adoption of Sustainable Forest Management
bull Revised Forestry Code of the Philippines and the Watersheds Code
bull Various biodiversity acts
bull Fisheries Code and AFMA
bull Clean Air Act
Challenges and Priorities for Action
bull Sustainable and more productive utilization of natural resources
bull Focus and strengthen the protection of vulnerable and ecologically fragile areas
bull Create healthier environment for the populationbull Mitigate the occurrence of natural disasters bull Ensure environmental accountability for all
industries
CROSS-CUTTING CHALLENGEShellip
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005
Government Expenditure Program by Sector FY 2000-2005
Social Services Debt Service Economic Services General Public Services Defense
CROSSCUTTING CHALLENGES AND PRIORITIES FOR ACTION
Source DBM Budget of Expenditure and Sources of Financing
FINANCING THE MDGs
SectorYear 2001 2002 2003 2004
Economic Services 15982070 45484830 52853500 58700890
(15) (32) (33) (34)Social Services 28979110 26352690 34001700 36135990
(27) (19) (21) (21)General Public Services 63375820 69580140 73954470 78545740
(58) (49) (46) (45)Total Public Expenditures 108337000 141417660 160809670 173382620
FINANCING THE MDGs
Distribution of Public Expenditures by Local Government UnitsBy Sector 2001-2004 (in thousand pesos)
Source DBM Budget of Expenditure and Sources of Financing
CROSSCUTTING CHALLENGES AND PRIORITIES FOR ACTION
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
2001 2002 2003 2004
ODA Commitments by SectorFY 2001-2004 (US$ million)
Agriculture agrarianreform and naturalresources
Governance andinstitutionsdevelopment
Infrastructuredevelopment
Social reform anddevelopment
Industry and services
Source NEDA-PIS
CROSSCUTTING CHALLENGES AND PRIORITIES FOR ACTION
FINANCING THE MDGs
CROSS-CUTTING CHALLENGES AND
PRIORITIES FOR ACTIONbull Reduce disparities across regions
bull Increase resource allocation for MDG-related programs and projects
bull Enforce fullstricter implementation of laws amp ensure passage of MDG-supportive bills
bull Strengthen monitoring and implementation
bull Scale-up campaign for localization
bull Develop an advocacy plan
bull Intensify multisectoral partnership amp collaboration
Facilitating Factors bull Strong global support for MDGs by the United
Nations ASEAN and other multilateral organizations
bull Expanding national support among policymakers for MDGs (eg creation of the House Committee on MDGs issuance of EO on the MDGs)
bull Prioritization of MDGs in resource allocation (eg focusing of MTPIP investments on MDGs)
bull Increasing awareness and participation of private sector LGUs in MDG-related programs
Hindering Factors
bull Resource constraints (ie MDG financing gap of about $15 billion yearly)
bull Lack of support by creditors for the Debt for MDG ProjectsDebt for Equity in MDG Projects initiative
bull Low budgetary priority for MDGs accorded by some LGUs and
bull Lack of disaggregated data to monitor MDGs at local levels
Parallel Initiatives
Participation in the High-Level Plenary Meeting on MDGs
Formulation of the Plan of Action for Poverty Reduction (2006-2010)Enhance the current Poverty Reduction
Strategy and Program Framework
Advocacy for the Philippine proposal on Debt for Equity in MDG Projects
Implications on the Philippine Economy
MDG attainment would requirebull Enhanced revenue generationbull LGU private sector and civil society supportbull Expansion of microfinance services for the poorbull Pursuit of projects with high economic impactbull Right-sizing the bureaucracybull Privatization andbull Tapping OFW remittances
INTENSIFYING MULTISECTORAL PARTNERSHIP AND COLLABORATION
Government (executive legislature judicial)
Local Government
CSOsAcademe
Local Government
PrivateBusiness
Donor Community
Environmental Situationand Challenges
Goal 7 Ensure Environmental Sustainability
bull Forests resources and watersheds
bull Biodiversity resources
bull Coastal and marine resources
bull Air quality
bull Water resources
bull Waste and toxic chemicals
Area Proportion to Total
(Hectares) ()
7168400 100
2560872 36
Broadleaved 2448864
Mixed 24618
Coniferous 87390
4030588 56
Broadleaved 3847284
Mixed 69861
Coniferous 113443
247362 3
329578 5Source Forest Management Bureau (FMB)
Total Forest
Mangrove
Plantation
Forest Cover by Forest Type 2003
Closed Forest
Open Forest
Category
Area Reforested 1990-2003 (in hectares)Year Total
Government
Percent Non-Government
Percent
Sector
2003 15087 13195 875 1892 125
2002 25620 20682 807 4938 193
2001 31440 26524 844 4916 156
2000 27632 21740 787 5892 213
1999 42165 31183 74 10982 26
1998 42368 33219 784 9149 216
1997 66236 49301 744 16935 256
1996 46096 18869 409 27227 591
1995 65233 21841 335 43392 665
1994 49551 18032 364 31519 636
1993 19211 6347 33 12864 67
1992 40593 24304 599 16289 401
1991 93039 73602 791 19437 209
1990 191663 153949 803 37714 197
Annual Average
53995
Source DENR Annual Report
Biodiversity Resources
Philippineshellip one of the megadiverse countries in the
world higher regard for the endemism of local
species
buthellip most severely threatened of the
megadiverse countries
Coastal and Marine Resources rich sources of fish and aquatic products habitat for countless underwater wildlife natural areas for recreationtourism Water resourcesbull disparities in water supply coverage across regionsbull depletion of ground water especially in Metro
Manila and Metro Cebubull pollution of water sources
Air Qualitybull pollution remains a problem in Metro Manila and
major urban centersbull on the level of suspended particulates (TSP) air
quality is not within standards
Waste and Toxic Chemicalsbull solid waste generation in Metro Manila is estimated at
5345 tons per daybull urbanization inevitably increased the use of chemicalsbull no integrated treatment facility for hazardous waste
Priority Policies and Programs
bull Adoption of Sustainable Forest Management
bull Revised Forestry Code of the Philippines and the Watersheds Code
bull Various biodiversity acts
bull Fisheries Code and AFMA
bull Clean Air Act
Challenges and Priorities for Action
bull Sustainable and more productive utilization of natural resources
bull Focus and strengthen the protection of vulnerable and ecologically fragile areas
bull Create healthier environment for the populationbull Mitigate the occurrence of natural disasters bull Ensure environmental accountability for all
industries
CROSS-CUTTING CHALLENGEShellip
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005
Government Expenditure Program by Sector FY 2000-2005
Social Services Debt Service Economic Services General Public Services Defense
CROSSCUTTING CHALLENGES AND PRIORITIES FOR ACTION
Source DBM Budget of Expenditure and Sources of Financing
FINANCING THE MDGs
SectorYear 2001 2002 2003 2004
Economic Services 15982070 45484830 52853500 58700890
(15) (32) (33) (34)Social Services 28979110 26352690 34001700 36135990
(27) (19) (21) (21)General Public Services 63375820 69580140 73954470 78545740
(58) (49) (46) (45)Total Public Expenditures 108337000 141417660 160809670 173382620
FINANCING THE MDGs
Distribution of Public Expenditures by Local Government UnitsBy Sector 2001-2004 (in thousand pesos)
Source DBM Budget of Expenditure and Sources of Financing
CROSSCUTTING CHALLENGES AND PRIORITIES FOR ACTION
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
2001 2002 2003 2004
ODA Commitments by SectorFY 2001-2004 (US$ million)
Agriculture agrarianreform and naturalresources
Governance andinstitutionsdevelopment
Infrastructuredevelopment
Social reform anddevelopment
Industry and services
Source NEDA-PIS
CROSSCUTTING CHALLENGES AND PRIORITIES FOR ACTION
FINANCING THE MDGs
CROSS-CUTTING CHALLENGES AND
PRIORITIES FOR ACTIONbull Reduce disparities across regions
bull Increase resource allocation for MDG-related programs and projects
bull Enforce fullstricter implementation of laws amp ensure passage of MDG-supportive bills
bull Strengthen monitoring and implementation
bull Scale-up campaign for localization
bull Develop an advocacy plan
bull Intensify multisectoral partnership amp collaboration
Facilitating Factors bull Strong global support for MDGs by the United
Nations ASEAN and other multilateral organizations
bull Expanding national support among policymakers for MDGs (eg creation of the House Committee on MDGs issuance of EO on the MDGs)
bull Prioritization of MDGs in resource allocation (eg focusing of MTPIP investments on MDGs)
bull Increasing awareness and participation of private sector LGUs in MDG-related programs
Hindering Factors
bull Resource constraints (ie MDG financing gap of about $15 billion yearly)
bull Lack of support by creditors for the Debt for MDG ProjectsDebt for Equity in MDG Projects initiative
bull Low budgetary priority for MDGs accorded by some LGUs and
bull Lack of disaggregated data to monitor MDGs at local levels
Parallel Initiatives
Participation in the High-Level Plenary Meeting on MDGs
Formulation of the Plan of Action for Poverty Reduction (2006-2010)Enhance the current Poverty Reduction
Strategy and Program Framework
Advocacy for the Philippine proposal on Debt for Equity in MDG Projects
Implications on the Philippine Economy
MDG attainment would requirebull Enhanced revenue generationbull LGU private sector and civil society supportbull Expansion of microfinance services for the poorbull Pursuit of projects with high economic impactbull Right-sizing the bureaucracybull Privatization andbull Tapping OFW remittances
Environmental Situationand Challenges
Goal 7 Ensure Environmental Sustainability
bull Forests resources and watersheds
bull Biodiversity resources
bull Coastal and marine resources
bull Air quality
bull Water resources
bull Waste and toxic chemicals
Area Proportion to Total
(Hectares) ()
7168400 100
2560872 36
Broadleaved 2448864
Mixed 24618
Coniferous 87390
4030588 56
Broadleaved 3847284
Mixed 69861
Coniferous 113443
247362 3
329578 5Source Forest Management Bureau (FMB)
Total Forest
Mangrove
Plantation
Forest Cover by Forest Type 2003
Closed Forest
Open Forest
Category
Area Reforested 1990-2003 (in hectares)Year Total
Government
Percent Non-Government
Percent
Sector
2003 15087 13195 875 1892 125
2002 25620 20682 807 4938 193
2001 31440 26524 844 4916 156
2000 27632 21740 787 5892 213
1999 42165 31183 74 10982 26
1998 42368 33219 784 9149 216
1997 66236 49301 744 16935 256
1996 46096 18869 409 27227 591
1995 65233 21841 335 43392 665
1994 49551 18032 364 31519 636
1993 19211 6347 33 12864 67
1992 40593 24304 599 16289 401
1991 93039 73602 791 19437 209
1990 191663 153949 803 37714 197
Annual Average
53995
Source DENR Annual Report
Biodiversity Resources
Philippineshellip one of the megadiverse countries in the
world higher regard for the endemism of local
species
buthellip most severely threatened of the
megadiverse countries
Coastal and Marine Resources rich sources of fish and aquatic products habitat for countless underwater wildlife natural areas for recreationtourism Water resourcesbull disparities in water supply coverage across regionsbull depletion of ground water especially in Metro
Manila and Metro Cebubull pollution of water sources
Air Qualitybull pollution remains a problem in Metro Manila and
major urban centersbull on the level of suspended particulates (TSP) air
quality is not within standards
Waste and Toxic Chemicalsbull solid waste generation in Metro Manila is estimated at
5345 tons per daybull urbanization inevitably increased the use of chemicalsbull no integrated treatment facility for hazardous waste
Priority Policies and Programs
bull Adoption of Sustainable Forest Management
bull Revised Forestry Code of the Philippines and the Watersheds Code
bull Various biodiversity acts
bull Fisheries Code and AFMA
bull Clean Air Act
Challenges and Priorities for Action
bull Sustainable and more productive utilization of natural resources
bull Focus and strengthen the protection of vulnerable and ecologically fragile areas
bull Create healthier environment for the populationbull Mitigate the occurrence of natural disasters bull Ensure environmental accountability for all
industries
CROSS-CUTTING CHALLENGEShellip
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005
Government Expenditure Program by Sector FY 2000-2005
Social Services Debt Service Economic Services General Public Services Defense
CROSSCUTTING CHALLENGES AND PRIORITIES FOR ACTION
Source DBM Budget of Expenditure and Sources of Financing
FINANCING THE MDGs
SectorYear 2001 2002 2003 2004
Economic Services 15982070 45484830 52853500 58700890
(15) (32) (33) (34)Social Services 28979110 26352690 34001700 36135990
(27) (19) (21) (21)General Public Services 63375820 69580140 73954470 78545740
(58) (49) (46) (45)Total Public Expenditures 108337000 141417660 160809670 173382620
FINANCING THE MDGs
Distribution of Public Expenditures by Local Government UnitsBy Sector 2001-2004 (in thousand pesos)
Source DBM Budget of Expenditure and Sources of Financing
CROSSCUTTING CHALLENGES AND PRIORITIES FOR ACTION
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
2001 2002 2003 2004
ODA Commitments by SectorFY 2001-2004 (US$ million)
Agriculture agrarianreform and naturalresources
Governance andinstitutionsdevelopment
Infrastructuredevelopment
Social reform anddevelopment
Industry and services
Source NEDA-PIS
CROSSCUTTING CHALLENGES AND PRIORITIES FOR ACTION
FINANCING THE MDGs
CROSS-CUTTING CHALLENGES AND
PRIORITIES FOR ACTIONbull Reduce disparities across regions
bull Increase resource allocation for MDG-related programs and projects
bull Enforce fullstricter implementation of laws amp ensure passage of MDG-supportive bills
bull Strengthen monitoring and implementation
bull Scale-up campaign for localization
bull Develop an advocacy plan
bull Intensify multisectoral partnership amp collaboration
Facilitating Factors bull Strong global support for MDGs by the United
Nations ASEAN and other multilateral organizations
bull Expanding national support among policymakers for MDGs (eg creation of the House Committee on MDGs issuance of EO on the MDGs)
bull Prioritization of MDGs in resource allocation (eg focusing of MTPIP investments on MDGs)
bull Increasing awareness and participation of private sector LGUs in MDG-related programs
Hindering Factors
bull Resource constraints (ie MDG financing gap of about $15 billion yearly)
bull Lack of support by creditors for the Debt for MDG ProjectsDebt for Equity in MDG Projects initiative
bull Low budgetary priority for MDGs accorded by some LGUs and
bull Lack of disaggregated data to monitor MDGs at local levels
Parallel Initiatives
Participation in the High-Level Plenary Meeting on MDGs
Formulation of the Plan of Action for Poverty Reduction (2006-2010)Enhance the current Poverty Reduction
Strategy and Program Framework
Advocacy for the Philippine proposal on Debt for Equity in MDG Projects
Implications on the Philippine Economy
MDG attainment would requirebull Enhanced revenue generationbull LGU private sector and civil society supportbull Expansion of microfinance services for the poorbull Pursuit of projects with high economic impactbull Right-sizing the bureaucracybull Privatization andbull Tapping OFW remittances
Goal 7 Ensure Environmental Sustainability
bull Forests resources and watersheds
bull Biodiversity resources
bull Coastal and marine resources
bull Air quality
bull Water resources
bull Waste and toxic chemicals
Area Proportion to Total
(Hectares) ()
7168400 100
2560872 36
Broadleaved 2448864
Mixed 24618
Coniferous 87390
4030588 56
Broadleaved 3847284
Mixed 69861
Coniferous 113443
247362 3
329578 5Source Forest Management Bureau (FMB)
Total Forest
Mangrove
Plantation
Forest Cover by Forest Type 2003
Closed Forest
Open Forest
Category
Area Reforested 1990-2003 (in hectares)Year Total
Government
Percent Non-Government
Percent
Sector
2003 15087 13195 875 1892 125
2002 25620 20682 807 4938 193
2001 31440 26524 844 4916 156
2000 27632 21740 787 5892 213
1999 42165 31183 74 10982 26
1998 42368 33219 784 9149 216
1997 66236 49301 744 16935 256
1996 46096 18869 409 27227 591
1995 65233 21841 335 43392 665
1994 49551 18032 364 31519 636
1993 19211 6347 33 12864 67
1992 40593 24304 599 16289 401
1991 93039 73602 791 19437 209
1990 191663 153949 803 37714 197
Annual Average
53995
Source DENR Annual Report
Biodiversity Resources
Philippineshellip one of the megadiverse countries in the
world higher regard for the endemism of local
species
buthellip most severely threatened of the
megadiverse countries
Coastal and Marine Resources rich sources of fish and aquatic products habitat for countless underwater wildlife natural areas for recreationtourism Water resourcesbull disparities in water supply coverage across regionsbull depletion of ground water especially in Metro
Manila and Metro Cebubull pollution of water sources
Air Qualitybull pollution remains a problem in Metro Manila and
major urban centersbull on the level of suspended particulates (TSP) air
quality is not within standards
Waste and Toxic Chemicalsbull solid waste generation in Metro Manila is estimated at
5345 tons per daybull urbanization inevitably increased the use of chemicalsbull no integrated treatment facility for hazardous waste
Priority Policies and Programs
bull Adoption of Sustainable Forest Management
bull Revised Forestry Code of the Philippines and the Watersheds Code
bull Various biodiversity acts
bull Fisheries Code and AFMA
bull Clean Air Act
Challenges and Priorities for Action
bull Sustainable and more productive utilization of natural resources
bull Focus and strengthen the protection of vulnerable and ecologically fragile areas
bull Create healthier environment for the populationbull Mitigate the occurrence of natural disasters bull Ensure environmental accountability for all
industries
CROSS-CUTTING CHALLENGEShellip
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005
Government Expenditure Program by Sector FY 2000-2005
Social Services Debt Service Economic Services General Public Services Defense
CROSSCUTTING CHALLENGES AND PRIORITIES FOR ACTION
Source DBM Budget of Expenditure and Sources of Financing
FINANCING THE MDGs
SectorYear 2001 2002 2003 2004
Economic Services 15982070 45484830 52853500 58700890
(15) (32) (33) (34)Social Services 28979110 26352690 34001700 36135990
(27) (19) (21) (21)General Public Services 63375820 69580140 73954470 78545740
(58) (49) (46) (45)Total Public Expenditures 108337000 141417660 160809670 173382620
FINANCING THE MDGs
Distribution of Public Expenditures by Local Government UnitsBy Sector 2001-2004 (in thousand pesos)
Source DBM Budget of Expenditure and Sources of Financing
CROSSCUTTING CHALLENGES AND PRIORITIES FOR ACTION
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
2001 2002 2003 2004
ODA Commitments by SectorFY 2001-2004 (US$ million)
Agriculture agrarianreform and naturalresources
Governance andinstitutionsdevelopment
Infrastructuredevelopment
Social reform anddevelopment
Industry and services
Source NEDA-PIS
CROSSCUTTING CHALLENGES AND PRIORITIES FOR ACTION
FINANCING THE MDGs
CROSS-CUTTING CHALLENGES AND
PRIORITIES FOR ACTIONbull Reduce disparities across regions
bull Increase resource allocation for MDG-related programs and projects
bull Enforce fullstricter implementation of laws amp ensure passage of MDG-supportive bills
bull Strengthen monitoring and implementation
bull Scale-up campaign for localization
bull Develop an advocacy plan
bull Intensify multisectoral partnership amp collaboration
Facilitating Factors bull Strong global support for MDGs by the United
Nations ASEAN and other multilateral organizations
bull Expanding national support among policymakers for MDGs (eg creation of the House Committee on MDGs issuance of EO on the MDGs)
bull Prioritization of MDGs in resource allocation (eg focusing of MTPIP investments on MDGs)
bull Increasing awareness and participation of private sector LGUs in MDG-related programs
Hindering Factors
bull Resource constraints (ie MDG financing gap of about $15 billion yearly)
bull Lack of support by creditors for the Debt for MDG ProjectsDebt for Equity in MDG Projects initiative
bull Low budgetary priority for MDGs accorded by some LGUs and
bull Lack of disaggregated data to monitor MDGs at local levels
Parallel Initiatives
Participation in the High-Level Plenary Meeting on MDGs
Formulation of the Plan of Action for Poverty Reduction (2006-2010)Enhance the current Poverty Reduction
Strategy and Program Framework
Advocacy for the Philippine proposal on Debt for Equity in MDG Projects
Implications on the Philippine Economy
MDG attainment would requirebull Enhanced revenue generationbull LGU private sector and civil society supportbull Expansion of microfinance services for the poorbull Pursuit of projects with high economic impactbull Right-sizing the bureaucracybull Privatization andbull Tapping OFW remittances
Area Proportion to Total
(Hectares) ()
7168400 100
2560872 36
Broadleaved 2448864
Mixed 24618
Coniferous 87390
4030588 56
Broadleaved 3847284
Mixed 69861
Coniferous 113443
247362 3
329578 5Source Forest Management Bureau (FMB)
Total Forest
Mangrove
Plantation
Forest Cover by Forest Type 2003
Closed Forest
Open Forest
Category
Area Reforested 1990-2003 (in hectares)Year Total
Government
Percent Non-Government
Percent
Sector
2003 15087 13195 875 1892 125
2002 25620 20682 807 4938 193
2001 31440 26524 844 4916 156
2000 27632 21740 787 5892 213
1999 42165 31183 74 10982 26
1998 42368 33219 784 9149 216
1997 66236 49301 744 16935 256
1996 46096 18869 409 27227 591
1995 65233 21841 335 43392 665
1994 49551 18032 364 31519 636
1993 19211 6347 33 12864 67
1992 40593 24304 599 16289 401
1991 93039 73602 791 19437 209
1990 191663 153949 803 37714 197
Annual Average
53995
Source DENR Annual Report
Biodiversity Resources
Philippineshellip one of the megadiverse countries in the
world higher regard for the endemism of local
species
buthellip most severely threatened of the
megadiverse countries
Coastal and Marine Resources rich sources of fish and aquatic products habitat for countless underwater wildlife natural areas for recreationtourism Water resourcesbull disparities in water supply coverage across regionsbull depletion of ground water especially in Metro
Manila and Metro Cebubull pollution of water sources
Air Qualitybull pollution remains a problem in Metro Manila and
major urban centersbull on the level of suspended particulates (TSP) air
quality is not within standards
Waste and Toxic Chemicalsbull solid waste generation in Metro Manila is estimated at
5345 tons per daybull urbanization inevitably increased the use of chemicalsbull no integrated treatment facility for hazardous waste
Priority Policies and Programs
bull Adoption of Sustainable Forest Management
bull Revised Forestry Code of the Philippines and the Watersheds Code
bull Various biodiversity acts
bull Fisheries Code and AFMA
bull Clean Air Act
Challenges and Priorities for Action
bull Sustainable and more productive utilization of natural resources
bull Focus and strengthen the protection of vulnerable and ecologically fragile areas
bull Create healthier environment for the populationbull Mitigate the occurrence of natural disasters bull Ensure environmental accountability for all
industries
CROSS-CUTTING CHALLENGEShellip
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005
Government Expenditure Program by Sector FY 2000-2005
Social Services Debt Service Economic Services General Public Services Defense
CROSSCUTTING CHALLENGES AND PRIORITIES FOR ACTION
Source DBM Budget of Expenditure and Sources of Financing
FINANCING THE MDGs
SectorYear 2001 2002 2003 2004
Economic Services 15982070 45484830 52853500 58700890
(15) (32) (33) (34)Social Services 28979110 26352690 34001700 36135990
(27) (19) (21) (21)General Public Services 63375820 69580140 73954470 78545740
(58) (49) (46) (45)Total Public Expenditures 108337000 141417660 160809670 173382620
FINANCING THE MDGs
Distribution of Public Expenditures by Local Government UnitsBy Sector 2001-2004 (in thousand pesos)
Source DBM Budget of Expenditure and Sources of Financing
CROSSCUTTING CHALLENGES AND PRIORITIES FOR ACTION
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
2001 2002 2003 2004
ODA Commitments by SectorFY 2001-2004 (US$ million)
Agriculture agrarianreform and naturalresources
Governance andinstitutionsdevelopment
Infrastructuredevelopment
Social reform anddevelopment
Industry and services
Source NEDA-PIS
CROSSCUTTING CHALLENGES AND PRIORITIES FOR ACTION
FINANCING THE MDGs
CROSS-CUTTING CHALLENGES AND
PRIORITIES FOR ACTIONbull Reduce disparities across regions
bull Increase resource allocation for MDG-related programs and projects
bull Enforce fullstricter implementation of laws amp ensure passage of MDG-supportive bills
bull Strengthen monitoring and implementation
bull Scale-up campaign for localization
bull Develop an advocacy plan
bull Intensify multisectoral partnership amp collaboration
Facilitating Factors bull Strong global support for MDGs by the United
Nations ASEAN and other multilateral organizations
bull Expanding national support among policymakers for MDGs (eg creation of the House Committee on MDGs issuance of EO on the MDGs)
bull Prioritization of MDGs in resource allocation (eg focusing of MTPIP investments on MDGs)
bull Increasing awareness and participation of private sector LGUs in MDG-related programs
Hindering Factors
bull Resource constraints (ie MDG financing gap of about $15 billion yearly)
bull Lack of support by creditors for the Debt for MDG ProjectsDebt for Equity in MDG Projects initiative
bull Low budgetary priority for MDGs accorded by some LGUs and
bull Lack of disaggregated data to monitor MDGs at local levels
Parallel Initiatives
Participation in the High-Level Plenary Meeting on MDGs
Formulation of the Plan of Action for Poverty Reduction (2006-2010)Enhance the current Poverty Reduction
Strategy and Program Framework
Advocacy for the Philippine proposal on Debt for Equity in MDG Projects
Implications on the Philippine Economy
MDG attainment would requirebull Enhanced revenue generationbull LGU private sector and civil society supportbull Expansion of microfinance services for the poorbull Pursuit of projects with high economic impactbull Right-sizing the bureaucracybull Privatization andbull Tapping OFW remittances
Area Reforested 1990-2003 (in hectares)Year Total
Government
Percent Non-Government
Percent
Sector
2003 15087 13195 875 1892 125
2002 25620 20682 807 4938 193
2001 31440 26524 844 4916 156
2000 27632 21740 787 5892 213
1999 42165 31183 74 10982 26
1998 42368 33219 784 9149 216
1997 66236 49301 744 16935 256
1996 46096 18869 409 27227 591
1995 65233 21841 335 43392 665
1994 49551 18032 364 31519 636
1993 19211 6347 33 12864 67
1992 40593 24304 599 16289 401
1991 93039 73602 791 19437 209
1990 191663 153949 803 37714 197
Annual Average
53995
Source DENR Annual Report
Biodiversity Resources
Philippineshellip one of the megadiverse countries in the
world higher regard for the endemism of local
species
buthellip most severely threatened of the
megadiverse countries
Coastal and Marine Resources rich sources of fish and aquatic products habitat for countless underwater wildlife natural areas for recreationtourism Water resourcesbull disparities in water supply coverage across regionsbull depletion of ground water especially in Metro
Manila and Metro Cebubull pollution of water sources
Air Qualitybull pollution remains a problem in Metro Manila and
major urban centersbull on the level of suspended particulates (TSP) air
quality is not within standards
Waste and Toxic Chemicalsbull solid waste generation in Metro Manila is estimated at
5345 tons per daybull urbanization inevitably increased the use of chemicalsbull no integrated treatment facility for hazardous waste
Priority Policies and Programs
bull Adoption of Sustainable Forest Management
bull Revised Forestry Code of the Philippines and the Watersheds Code
bull Various biodiversity acts
bull Fisheries Code and AFMA
bull Clean Air Act
Challenges and Priorities for Action
bull Sustainable and more productive utilization of natural resources
bull Focus and strengthen the protection of vulnerable and ecologically fragile areas
bull Create healthier environment for the populationbull Mitigate the occurrence of natural disasters bull Ensure environmental accountability for all
industries
CROSS-CUTTING CHALLENGEShellip
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005
Government Expenditure Program by Sector FY 2000-2005
Social Services Debt Service Economic Services General Public Services Defense
CROSSCUTTING CHALLENGES AND PRIORITIES FOR ACTION
Source DBM Budget of Expenditure and Sources of Financing
FINANCING THE MDGs
SectorYear 2001 2002 2003 2004
Economic Services 15982070 45484830 52853500 58700890
(15) (32) (33) (34)Social Services 28979110 26352690 34001700 36135990
(27) (19) (21) (21)General Public Services 63375820 69580140 73954470 78545740
(58) (49) (46) (45)Total Public Expenditures 108337000 141417660 160809670 173382620
FINANCING THE MDGs
Distribution of Public Expenditures by Local Government UnitsBy Sector 2001-2004 (in thousand pesos)
Source DBM Budget of Expenditure and Sources of Financing
CROSSCUTTING CHALLENGES AND PRIORITIES FOR ACTION
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
2001 2002 2003 2004
ODA Commitments by SectorFY 2001-2004 (US$ million)
Agriculture agrarianreform and naturalresources
Governance andinstitutionsdevelopment
Infrastructuredevelopment
Social reform anddevelopment
Industry and services
Source NEDA-PIS
CROSSCUTTING CHALLENGES AND PRIORITIES FOR ACTION
FINANCING THE MDGs
CROSS-CUTTING CHALLENGES AND
PRIORITIES FOR ACTIONbull Reduce disparities across regions
bull Increase resource allocation for MDG-related programs and projects
bull Enforce fullstricter implementation of laws amp ensure passage of MDG-supportive bills
bull Strengthen monitoring and implementation
bull Scale-up campaign for localization
bull Develop an advocacy plan
bull Intensify multisectoral partnership amp collaboration
Facilitating Factors bull Strong global support for MDGs by the United
Nations ASEAN and other multilateral organizations
bull Expanding national support among policymakers for MDGs (eg creation of the House Committee on MDGs issuance of EO on the MDGs)
bull Prioritization of MDGs in resource allocation (eg focusing of MTPIP investments on MDGs)
bull Increasing awareness and participation of private sector LGUs in MDG-related programs
Hindering Factors
bull Resource constraints (ie MDG financing gap of about $15 billion yearly)
bull Lack of support by creditors for the Debt for MDG ProjectsDebt for Equity in MDG Projects initiative
bull Low budgetary priority for MDGs accorded by some LGUs and
bull Lack of disaggregated data to monitor MDGs at local levels
Parallel Initiatives
Participation in the High-Level Plenary Meeting on MDGs
Formulation of the Plan of Action for Poverty Reduction (2006-2010)Enhance the current Poverty Reduction
Strategy and Program Framework
Advocacy for the Philippine proposal on Debt for Equity in MDG Projects
Implications on the Philippine Economy
MDG attainment would requirebull Enhanced revenue generationbull LGU private sector and civil society supportbull Expansion of microfinance services for the poorbull Pursuit of projects with high economic impactbull Right-sizing the bureaucracybull Privatization andbull Tapping OFW remittances
Biodiversity Resources
Philippineshellip one of the megadiverse countries in the
world higher regard for the endemism of local
species
buthellip most severely threatened of the
megadiverse countries
Coastal and Marine Resources rich sources of fish and aquatic products habitat for countless underwater wildlife natural areas for recreationtourism Water resourcesbull disparities in water supply coverage across regionsbull depletion of ground water especially in Metro
Manila and Metro Cebubull pollution of water sources
Air Qualitybull pollution remains a problem in Metro Manila and
major urban centersbull on the level of suspended particulates (TSP) air
quality is not within standards
Waste and Toxic Chemicalsbull solid waste generation in Metro Manila is estimated at
5345 tons per daybull urbanization inevitably increased the use of chemicalsbull no integrated treatment facility for hazardous waste
Priority Policies and Programs
bull Adoption of Sustainable Forest Management
bull Revised Forestry Code of the Philippines and the Watersheds Code
bull Various biodiversity acts
bull Fisheries Code and AFMA
bull Clean Air Act
Challenges and Priorities for Action
bull Sustainable and more productive utilization of natural resources
bull Focus and strengthen the protection of vulnerable and ecologically fragile areas
bull Create healthier environment for the populationbull Mitigate the occurrence of natural disasters bull Ensure environmental accountability for all
industries
CROSS-CUTTING CHALLENGEShellip
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005
Government Expenditure Program by Sector FY 2000-2005
Social Services Debt Service Economic Services General Public Services Defense
CROSSCUTTING CHALLENGES AND PRIORITIES FOR ACTION
Source DBM Budget of Expenditure and Sources of Financing
FINANCING THE MDGs
SectorYear 2001 2002 2003 2004
Economic Services 15982070 45484830 52853500 58700890
(15) (32) (33) (34)Social Services 28979110 26352690 34001700 36135990
(27) (19) (21) (21)General Public Services 63375820 69580140 73954470 78545740
(58) (49) (46) (45)Total Public Expenditures 108337000 141417660 160809670 173382620
FINANCING THE MDGs
Distribution of Public Expenditures by Local Government UnitsBy Sector 2001-2004 (in thousand pesos)
Source DBM Budget of Expenditure and Sources of Financing
CROSSCUTTING CHALLENGES AND PRIORITIES FOR ACTION
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
2001 2002 2003 2004
ODA Commitments by SectorFY 2001-2004 (US$ million)
Agriculture agrarianreform and naturalresources
Governance andinstitutionsdevelopment
Infrastructuredevelopment
Social reform anddevelopment
Industry and services
Source NEDA-PIS
CROSSCUTTING CHALLENGES AND PRIORITIES FOR ACTION
FINANCING THE MDGs
CROSS-CUTTING CHALLENGES AND
PRIORITIES FOR ACTIONbull Reduce disparities across regions
bull Increase resource allocation for MDG-related programs and projects
bull Enforce fullstricter implementation of laws amp ensure passage of MDG-supportive bills
bull Strengthen monitoring and implementation
bull Scale-up campaign for localization
bull Develop an advocacy plan
bull Intensify multisectoral partnership amp collaboration
Facilitating Factors bull Strong global support for MDGs by the United
Nations ASEAN and other multilateral organizations
bull Expanding national support among policymakers for MDGs (eg creation of the House Committee on MDGs issuance of EO on the MDGs)
bull Prioritization of MDGs in resource allocation (eg focusing of MTPIP investments on MDGs)
bull Increasing awareness and participation of private sector LGUs in MDG-related programs
Hindering Factors
bull Resource constraints (ie MDG financing gap of about $15 billion yearly)
bull Lack of support by creditors for the Debt for MDG ProjectsDebt for Equity in MDG Projects initiative
bull Low budgetary priority for MDGs accorded by some LGUs and
bull Lack of disaggregated data to monitor MDGs at local levels
Parallel Initiatives
Participation in the High-Level Plenary Meeting on MDGs
Formulation of the Plan of Action for Poverty Reduction (2006-2010)Enhance the current Poverty Reduction
Strategy and Program Framework
Advocacy for the Philippine proposal on Debt for Equity in MDG Projects
Implications on the Philippine Economy
MDG attainment would requirebull Enhanced revenue generationbull LGU private sector and civil society supportbull Expansion of microfinance services for the poorbull Pursuit of projects with high economic impactbull Right-sizing the bureaucracybull Privatization andbull Tapping OFW remittances
Coastal and Marine Resources rich sources of fish and aquatic products habitat for countless underwater wildlife natural areas for recreationtourism Water resourcesbull disparities in water supply coverage across regionsbull depletion of ground water especially in Metro
Manila and Metro Cebubull pollution of water sources
Air Qualitybull pollution remains a problem in Metro Manila and
major urban centersbull on the level of suspended particulates (TSP) air
quality is not within standards
Waste and Toxic Chemicalsbull solid waste generation in Metro Manila is estimated at
5345 tons per daybull urbanization inevitably increased the use of chemicalsbull no integrated treatment facility for hazardous waste
Priority Policies and Programs
bull Adoption of Sustainable Forest Management
bull Revised Forestry Code of the Philippines and the Watersheds Code
bull Various biodiversity acts
bull Fisheries Code and AFMA
bull Clean Air Act
Challenges and Priorities for Action
bull Sustainable and more productive utilization of natural resources
bull Focus and strengthen the protection of vulnerable and ecologically fragile areas
bull Create healthier environment for the populationbull Mitigate the occurrence of natural disasters bull Ensure environmental accountability for all
industries
CROSS-CUTTING CHALLENGEShellip
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005
Government Expenditure Program by Sector FY 2000-2005
Social Services Debt Service Economic Services General Public Services Defense
CROSSCUTTING CHALLENGES AND PRIORITIES FOR ACTION
Source DBM Budget of Expenditure and Sources of Financing
FINANCING THE MDGs
SectorYear 2001 2002 2003 2004
Economic Services 15982070 45484830 52853500 58700890
(15) (32) (33) (34)Social Services 28979110 26352690 34001700 36135990
(27) (19) (21) (21)General Public Services 63375820 69580140 73954470 78545740
(58) (49) (46) (45)Total Public Expenditures 108337000 141417660 160809670 173382620
FINANCING THE MDGs
Distribution of Public Expenditures by Local Government UnitsBy Sector 2001-2004 (in thousand pesos)
Source DBM Budget of Expenditure and Sources of Financing
CROSSCUTTING CHALLENGES AND PRIORITIES FOR ACTION
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
2001 2002 2003 2004
ODA Commitments by SectorFY 2001-2004 (US$ million)
Agriculture agrarianreform and naturalresources
Governance andinstitutionsdevelopment
Infrastructuredevelopment
Social reform anddevelopment
Industry and services
Source NEDA-PIS
CROSSCUTTING CHALLENGES AND PRIORITIES FOR ACTION
FINANCING THE MDGs
CROSS-CUTTING CHALLENGES AND
PRIORITIES FOR ACTIONbull Reduce disparities across regions
bull Increase resource allocation for MDG-related programs and projects
bull Enforce fullstricter implementation of laws amp ensure passage of MDG-supportive bills
bull Strengthen monitoring and implementation
bull Scale-up campaign for localization
bull Develop an advocacy plan
bull Intensify multisectoral partnership amp collaboration
Facilitating Factors bull Strong global support for MDGs by the United
Nations ASEAN and other multilateral organizations
bull Expanding national support among policymakers for MDGs (eg creation of the House Committee on MDGs issuance of EO on the MDGs)
bull Prioritization of MDGs in resource allocation (eg focusing of MTPIP investments on MDGs)
bull Increasing awareness and participation of private sector LGUs in MDG-related programs
Hindering Factors
bull Resource constraints (ie MDG financing gap of about $15 billion yearly)
bull Lack of support by creditors for the Debt for MDG ProjectsDebt for Equity in MDG Projects initiative
bull Low budgetary priority for MDGs accorded by some LGUs and
bull Lack of disaggregated data to monitor MDGs at local levels
Parallel Initiatives
Participation in the High-Level Plenary Meeting on MDGs
Formulation of the Plan of Action for Poverty Reduction (2006-2010)Enhance the current Poverty Reduction
Strategy and Program Framework
Advocacy for the Philippine proposal on Debt for Equity in MDG Projects
Implications on the Philippine Economy
MDG attainment would requirebull Enhanced revenue generationbull LGU private sector and civil society supportbull Expansion of microfinance services for the poorbull Pursuit of projects with high economic impactbull Right-sizing the bureaucracybull Privatization andbull Tapping OFW remittances
Air Qualitybull pollution remains a problem in Metro Manila and
major urban centersbull on the level of suspended particulates (TSP) air
quality is not within standards
Waste and Toxic Chemicalsbull solid waste generation in Metro Manila is estimated at
5345 tons per daybull urbanization inevitably increased the use of chemicalsbull no integrated treatment facility for hazardous waste
Priority Policies and Programs
bull Adoption of Sustainable Forest Management
bull Revised Forestry Code of the Philippines and the Watersheds Code
bull Various biodiversity acts
bull Fisheries Code and AFMA
bull Clean Air Act
Challenges and Priorities for Action
bull Sustainable and more productive utilization of natural resources
bull Focus and strengthen the protection of vulnerable and ecologically fragile areas
bull Create healthier environment for the populationbull Mitigate the occurrence of natural disasters bull Ensure environmental accountability for all
industries
CROSS-CUTTING CHALLENGEShellip
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005
Government Expenditure Program by Sector FY 2000-2005
Social Services Debt Service Economic Services General Public Services Defense
CROSSCUTTING CHALLENGES AND PRIORITIES FOR ACTION
Source DBM Budget of Expenditure and Sources of Financing
FINANCING THE MDGs
SectorYear 2001 2002 2003 2004
Economic Services 15982070 45484830 52853500 58700890
(15) (32) (33) (34)Social Services 28979110 26352690 34001700 36135990
(27) (19) (21) (21)General Public Services 63375820 69580140 73954470 78545740
(58) (49) (46) (45)Total Public Expenditures 108337000 141417660 160809670 173382620
FINANCING THE MDGs
Distribution of Public Expenditures by Local Government UnitsBy Sector 2001-2004 (in thousand pesos)
Source DBM Budget of Expenditure and Sources of Financing
CROSSCUTTING CHALLENGES AND PRIORITIES FOR ACTION
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
2001 2002 2003 2004
ODA Commitments by SectorFY 2001-2004 (US$ million)
Agriculture agrarianreform and naturalresources
Governance andinstitutionsdevelopment
Infrastructuredevelopment
Social reform anddevelopment
Industry and services
Source NEDA-PIS
CROSSCUTTING CHALLENGES AND PRIORITIES FOR ACTION
FINANCING THE MDGs
CROSS-CUTTING CHALLENGES AND
PRIORITIES FOR ACTIONbull Reduce disparities across regions
bull Increase resource allocation for MDG-related programs and projects
bull Enforce fullstricter implementation of laws amp ensure passage of MDG-supportive bills
bull Strengthen monitoring and implementation
bull Scale-up campaign for localization
bull Develop an advocacy plan
bull Intensify multisectoral partnership amp collaboration
Facilitating Factors bull Strong global support for MDGs by the United
Nations ASEAN and other multilateral organizations
bull Expanding national support among policymakers for MDGs (eg creation of the House Committee on MDGs issuance of EO on the MDGs)
bull Prioritization of MDGs in resource allocation (eg focusing of MTPIP investments on MDGs)
bull Increasing awareness and participation of private sector LGUs in MDG-related programs
Hindering Factors
bull Resource constraints (ie MDG financing gap of about $15 billion yearly)
bull Lack of support by creditors for the Debt for MDG ProjectsDebt for Equity in MDG Projects initiative
bull Low budgetary priority for MDGs accorded by some LGUs and
bull Lack of disaggregated data to monitor MDGs at local levels
Parallel Initiatives
Participation in the High-Level Plenary Meeting on MDGs
Formulation of the Plan of Action for Poverty Reduction (2006-2010)Enhance the current Poverty Reduction
Strategy and Program Framework
Advocacy for the Philippine proposal on Debt for Equity in MDG Projects
Implications on the Philippine Economy
MDG attainment would requirebull Enhanced revenue generationbull LGU private sector and civil society supportbull Expansion of microfinance services for the poorbull Pursuit of projects with high economic impactbull Right-sizing the bureaucracybull Privatization andbull Tapping OFW remittances
Priority Policies and Programs
bull Adoption of Sustainable Forest Management
bull Revised Forestry Code of the Philippines and the Watersheds Code
bull Various biodiversity acts
bull Fisheries Code and AFMA
bull Clean Air Act
Challenges and Priorities for Action
bull Sustainable and more productive utilization of natural resources
bull Focus and strengthen the protection of vulnerable and ecologically fragile areas
bull Create healthier environment for the populationbull Mitigate the occurrence of natural disasters bull Ensure environmental accountability for all
industries
CROSS-CUTTING CHALLENGEShellip
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005
Government Expenditure Program by Sector FY 2000-2005
Social Services Debt Service Economic Services General Public Services Defense
CROSSCUTTING CHALLENGES AND PRIORITIES FOR ACTION
Source DBM Budget of Expenditure and Sources of Financing
FINANCING THE MDGs
SectorYear 2001 2002 2003 2004
Economic Services 15982070 45484830 52853500 58700890
(15) (32) (33) (34)Social Services 28979110 26352690 34001700 36135990
(27) (19) (21) (21)General Public Services 63375820 69580140 73954470 78545740
(58) (49) (46) (45)Total Public Expenditures 108337000 141417660 160809670 173382620
FINANCING THE MDGs
Distribution of Public Expenditures by Local Government UnitsBy Sector 2001-2004 (in thousand pesos)
Source DBM Budget of Expenditure and Sources of Financing
CROSSCUTTING CHALLENGES AND PRIORITIES FOR ACTION
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
2001 2002 2003 2004
ODA Commitments by SectorFY 2001-2004 (US$ million)
Agriculture agrarianreform and naturalresources
Governance andinstitutionsdevelopment
Infrastructuredevelopment
Social reform anddevelopment
Industry and services
Source NEDA-PIS
CROSSCUTTING CHALLENGES AND PRIORITIES FOR ACTION
FINANCING THE MDGs
CROSS-CUTTING CHALLENGES AND
PRIORITIES FOR ACTIONbull Reduce disparities across regions
bull Increase resource allocation for MDG-related programs and projects
bull Enforce fullstricter implementation of laws amp ensure passage of MDG-supportive bills
bull Strengthen monitoring and implementation
bull Scale-up campaign for localization
bull Develop an advocacy plan
bull Intensify multisectoral partnership amp collaboration
Facilitating Factors bull Strong global support for MDGs by the United
Nations ASEAN and other multilateral organizations
bull Expanding national support among policymakers for MDGs (eg creation of the House Committee on MDGs issuance of EO on the MDGs)
bull Prioritization of MDGs in resource allocation (eg focusing of MTPIP investments on MDGs)
bull Increasing awareness and participation of private sector LGUs in MDG-related programs
Hindering Factors
bull Resource constraints (ie MDG financing gap of about $15 billion yearly)
bull Lack of support by creditors for the Debt for MDG ProjectsDebt for Equity in MDG Projects initiative
bull Low budgetary priority for MDGs accorded by some LGUs and
bull Lack of disaggregated data to monitor MDGs at local levels
Parallel Initiatives
Participation in the High-Level Plenary Meeting on MDGs
Formulation of the Plan of Action for Poverty Reduction (2006-2010)Enhance the current Poverty Reduction
Strategy and Program Framework
Advocacy for the Philippine proposal on Debt for Equity in MDG Projects
Implications on the Philippine Economy
MDG attainment would requirebull Enhanced revenue generationbull LGU private sector and civil society supportbull Expansion of microfinance services for the poorbull Pursuit of projects with high economic impactbull Right-sizing the bureaucracybull Privatization andbull Tapping OFW remittances
Challenges and Priorities for Action
bull Sustainable and more productive utilization of natural resources
bull Focus and strengthen the protection of vulnerable and ecologically fragile areas
bull Create healthier environment for the populationbull Mitigate the occurrence of natural disasters bull Ensure environmental accountability for all
industries
CROSS-CUTTING CHALLENGEShellip
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005
Government Expenditure Program by Sector FY 2000-2005
Social Services Debt Service Economic Services General Public Services Defense
CROSSCUTTING CHALLENGES AND PRIORITIES FOR ACTION
Source DBM Budget of Expenditure and Sources of Financing
FINANCING THE MDGs
SectorYear 2001 2002 2003 2004
Economic Services 15982070 45484830 52853500 58700890
(15) (32) (33) (34)Social Services 28979110 26352690 34001700 36135990
(27) (19) (21) (21)General Public Services 63375820 69580140 73954470 78545740
(58) (49) (46) (45)Total Public Expenditures 108337000 141417660 160809670 173382620
FINANCING THE MDGs
Distribution of Public Expenditures by Local Government UnitsBy Sector 2001-2004 (in thousand pesos)
Source DBM Budget of Expenditure and Sources of Financing
CROSSCUTTING CHALLENGES AND PRIORITIES FOR ACTION
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
2001 2002 2003 2004
ODA Commitments by SectorFY 2001-2004 (US$ million)
Agriculture agrarianreform and naturalresources
Governance andinstitutionsdevelopment
Infrastructuredevelopment
Social reform anddevelopment
Industry and services
Source NEDA-PIS
CROSSCUTTING CHALLENGES AND PRIORITIES FOR ACTION
FINANCING THE MDGs
CROSS-CUTTING CHALLENGES AND
PRIORITIES FOR ACTIONbull Reduce disparities across regions
bull Increase resource allocation for MDG-related programs and projects
bull Enforce fullstricter implementation of laws amp ensure passage of MDG-supportive bills
bull Strengthen monitoring and implementation
bull Scale-up campaign for localization
bull Develop an advocacy plan
bull Intensify multisectoral partnership amp collaboration
Facilitating Factors bull Strong global support for MDGs by the United
Nations ASEAN and other multilateral organizations
bull Expanding national support among policymakers for MDGs (eg creation of the House Committee on MDGs issuance of EO on the MDGs)
bull Prioritization of MDGs in resource allocation (eg focusing of MTPIP investments on MDGs)
bull Increasing awareness and participation of private sector LGUs in MDG-related programs
Hindering Factors
bull Resource constraints (ie MDG financing gap of about $15 billion yearly)
bull Lack of support by creditors for the Debt for MDG ProjectsDebt for Equity in MDG Projects initiative
bull Low budgetary priority for MDGs accorded by some LGUs and
bull Lack of disaggregated data to monitor MDGs at local levels
Parallel Initiatives
Participation in the High-Level Plenary Meeting on MDGs
Formulation of the Plan of Action for Poverty Reduction (2006-2010)Enhance the current Poverty Reduction
Strategy and Program Framework
Advocacy for the Philippine proposal on Debt for Equity in MDG Projects
Implications on the Philippine Economy
MDG attainment would requirebull Enhanced revenue generationbull LGU private sector and civil society supportbull Expansion of microfinance services for the poorbull Pursuit of projects with high economic impactbull Right-sizing the bureaucracybull Privatization andbull Tapping OFW remittances
CROSS-CUTTING CHALLENGEShellip
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005
Government Expenditure Program by Sector FY 2000-2005
Social Services Debt Service Economic Services General Public Services Defense
CROSSCUTTING CHALLENGES AND PRIORITIES FOR ACTION
Source DBM Budget of Expenditure and Sources of Financing
FINANCING THE MDGs
SectorYear 2001 2002 2003 2004
Economic Services 15982070 45484830 52853500 58700890
(15) (32) (33) (34)Social Services 28979110 26352690 34001700 36135990
(27) (19) (21) (21)General Public Services 63375820 69580140 73954470 78545740
(58) (49) (46) (45)Total Public Expenditures 108337000 141417660 160809670 173382620
FINANCING THE MDGs
Distribution of Public Expenditures by Local Government UnitsBy Sector 2001-2004 (in thousand pesos)
Source DBM Budget of Expenditure and Sources of Financing
CROSSCUTTING CHALLENGES AND PRIORITIES FOR ACTION
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
2001 2002 2003 2004
ODA Commitments by SectorFY 2001-2004 (US$ million)
Agriculture agrarianreform and naturalresources
Governance andinstitutionsdevelopment
Infrastructuredevelopment
Social reform anddevelopment
Industry and services
Source NEDA-PIS
CROSSCUTTING CHALLENGES AND PRIORITIES FOR ACTION
FINANCING THE MDGs
CROSS-CUTTING CHALLENGES AND
PRIORITIES FOR ACTIONbull Reduce disparities across regions
bull Increase resource allocation for MDG-related programs and projects
bull Enforce fullstricter implementation of laws amp ensure passage of MDG-supportive bills
bull Strengthen monitoring and implementation
bull Scale-up campaign for localization
bull Develop an advocacy plan
bull Intensify multisectoral partnership amp collaboration
Facilitating Factors bull Strong global support for MDGs by the United
Nations ASEAN and other multilateral organizations
bull Expanding national support among policymakers for MDGs (eg creation of the House Committee on MDGs issuance of EO on the MDGs)
bull Prioritization of MDGs in resource allocation (eg focusing of MTPIP investments on MDGs)
bull Increasing awareness and participation of private sector LGUs in MDG-related programs
Hindering Factors
bull Resource constraints (ie MDG financing gap of about $15 billion yearly)
bull Lack of support by creditors for the Debt for MDG ProjectsDebt for Equity in MDG Projects initiative
bull Low budgetary priority for MDGs accorded by some LGUs and
bull Lack of disaggregated data to monitor MDGs at local levels
Parallel Initiatives
Participation in the High-Level Plenary Meeting on MDGs
Formulation of the Plan of Action for Poverty Reduction (2006-2010)Enhance the current Poverty Reduction
Strategy and Program Framework
Advocacy for the Philippine proposal on Debt for Equity in MDG Projects
Implications on the Philippine Economy
MDG attainment would requirebull Enhanced revenue generationbull LGU private sector and civil society supportbull Expansion of microfinance services for the poorbull Pursuit of projects with high economic impactbull Right-sizing the bureaucracybull Privatization andbull Tapping OFW remittances
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005
Government Expenditure Program by Sector FY 2000-2005
Social Services Debt Service Economic Services General Public Services Defense
CROSSCUTTING CHALLENGES AND PRIORITIES FOR ACTION
Source DBM Budget of Expenditure and Sources of Financing
FINANCING THE MDGs
SectorYear 2001 2002 2003 2004
Economic Services 15982070 45484830 52853500 58700890
(15) (32) (33) (34)Social Services 28979110 26352690 34001700 36135990
(27) (19) (21) (21)General Public Services 63375820 69580140 73954470 78545740
(58) (49) (46) (45)Total Public Expenditures 108337000 141417660 160809670 173382620
FINANCING THE MDGs
Distribution of Public Expenditures by Local Government UnitsBy Sector 2001-2004 (in thousand pesos)
Source DBM Budget of Expenditure and Sources of Financing
CROSSCUTTING CHALLENGES AND PRIORITIES FOR ACTION
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
2001 2002 2003 2004
ODA Commitments by SectorFY 2001-2004 (US$ million)
Agriculture agrarianreform and naturalresources
Governance andinstitutionsdevelopment
Infrastructuredevelopment
Social reform anddevelopment
Industry and services
Source NEDA-PIS
CROSSCUTTING CHALLENGES AND PRIORITIES FOR ACTION
FINANCING THE MDGs
CROSS-CUTTING CHALLENGES AND
PRIORITIES FOR ACTIONbull Reduce disparities across regions
bull Increase resource allocation for MDG-related programs and projects
bull Enforce fullstricter implementation of laws amp ensure passage of MDG-supportive bills
bull Strengthen monitoring and implementation
bull Scale-up campaign for localization
bull Develop an advocacy plan
bull Intensify multisectoral partnership amp collaboration
Facilitating Factors bull Strong global support for MDGs by the United
Nations ASEAN and other multilateral organizations
bull Expanding national support among policymakers for MDGs (eg creation of the House Committee on MDGs issuance of EO on the MDGs)
bull Prioritization of MDGs in resource allocation (eg focusing of MTPIP investments on MDGs)
bull Increasing awareness and participation of private sector LGUs in MDG-related programs
Hindering Factors
bull Resource constraints (ie MDG financing gap of about $15 billion yearly)
bull Lack of support by creditors for the Debt for MDG ProjectsDebt for Equity in MDG Projects initiative
bull Low budgetary priority for MDGs accorded by some LGUs and
bull Lack of disaggregated data to monitor MDGs at local levels
Parallel Initiatives
Participation in the High-Level Plenary Meeting on MDGs
Formulation of the Plan of Action for Poverty Reduction (2006-2010)Enhance the current Poverty Reduction
Strategy and Program Framework
Advocacy for the Philippine proposal on Debt for Equity in MDG Projects
Implications on the Philippine Economy
MDG attainment would requirebull Enhanced revenue generationbull LGU private sector and civil society supportbull Expansion of microfinance services for the poorbull Pursuit of projects with high economic impactbull Right-sizing the bureaucracybull Privatization andbull Tapping OFW remittances
SectorYear 2001 2002 2003 2004
Economic Services 15982070 45484830 52853500 58700890
(15) (32) (33) (34)Social Services 28979110 26352690 34001700 36135990
(27) (19) (21) (21)General Public Services 63375820 69580140 73954470 78545740
(58) (49) (46) (45)Total Public Expenditures 108337000 141417660 160809670 173382620
FINANCING THE MDGs
Distribution of Public Expenditures by Local Government UnitsBy Sector 2001-2004 (in thousand pesos)
Source DBM Budget of Expenditure and Sources of Financing
CROSSCUTTING CHALLENGES AND PRIORITIES FOR ACTION
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
2001 2002 2003 2004
ODA Commitments by SectorFY 2001-2004 (US$ million)
Agriculture agrarianreform and naturalresources
Governance andinstitutionsdevelopment
Infrastructuredevelopment
Social reform anddevelopment
Industry and services
Source NEDA-PIS
CROSSCUTTING CHALLENGES AND PRIORITIES FOR ACTION
FINANCING THE MDGs
CROSS-CUTTING CHALLENGES AND
PRIORITIES FOR ACTIONbull Reduce disparities across regions
bull Increase resource allocation for MDG-related programs and projects
bull Enforce fullstricter implementation of laws amp ensure passage of MDG-supportive bills
bull Strengthen monitoring and implementation
bull Scale-up campaign for localization
bull Develop an advocacy plan
bull Intensify multisectoral partnership amp collaboration
Facilitating Factors bull Strong global support for MDGs by the United
Nations ASEAN and other multilateral organizations
bull Expanding national support among policymakers for MDGs (eg creation of the House Committee on MDGs issuance of EO on the MDGs)
bull Prioritization of MDGs in resource allocation (eg focusing of MTPIP investments on MDGs)
bull Increasing awareness and participation of private sector LGUs in MDG-related programs
Hindering Factors
bull Resource constraints (ie MDG financing gap of about $15 billion yearly)
bull Lack of support by creditors for the Debt for MDG ProjectsDebt for Equity in MDG Projects initiative
bull Low budgetary priority for MDGs accorded by some LGUs and
bull Lack of disaggregated data to monitor MDGs at local levels
Parallel Initiatives
Participation in the High-Level Plenary Meeting on MDGs
Formulation of the Plan of Action for Poverty Reduction (2006-2010)Enhance the current Poverty Reduction
Strategy and Program Framework
Advocacy for the Philippine proposal on Debt for Equity in MDG Projects
Implications on the Philippine Economy
MDG attainment would requirebull Enhanced revenue generationbull LGU private sector and civil society supportbull Expansion of microfinance services for the poorbull Pursuit of projects with high economic impactbull Right-sizing the bureaucracybull Privatization andbull Tapping OFW remittances
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
2001 2002 2003 2004
ODA Commitments by SectorFY 2001-2004 (US$ million)
Agriculture agrarianreform and naturalresources
Governance andinstitutionsdevelopment
Infrastructuredevelopment
Social reform anddevelopment
Industry and services
Source NEDA-PIS
CROSSCUTTING CHALLENGES AND PRIORITIES FOR ACTION
FINANCING THE MDGs
CROSS-CUTTING CHALLENGES AND
PRIORITIES FOR ACTIONbull Reduce disparities across regions
bull Increase resource allocation for MDG-related programs and projects
bull Enforce fullstricter implementation of laws amp ensure passage of MDG-supportive bills
bull Strengthen monitoring and implementation
bull Scale-up campaign for localization
bull Develop an advocacy plan
bull Intensify multisectoral partnership amp collaboration
Facilitating Factors bull Strong global support for MDGs by the United
Nations ASEAN and other multilateral organizations
bull Expanding national support among policymakers for MDGs (eg creation of the House Committee on MDGs issuance of EO on the MDGs)
bull Prioritization of MDGs in resource allocation (eg focusing of MTPIP investments on MDGs)
bull Increasing awareness and participation of private sector LGUs in MDG-related programs
Hindering Factors
bull Resource constraints (ie MDG financing gap of about $15 billion yearly)
bull Lack of support by creditors for the Debt for MDG ProjectsDebt for Equity in MDG Projects initiative
bull Low budgetary priority for MDGs accorded by some LGUs and
bull Lack of disaggregated data to monitor MDGs at local levels
Parallel Initiatives
Participation in the High-Level Plenary Meeting on MDGs
Formulation of the Plan of Action for Poverty Reduction (2006-2010)Enhance the current Poverty Reduction
Strategy and Program Framework
Advocacy for the Philippine proposal on Debt for Equity in MDG Projects
Implications on the Philippine Economy
MDG attainment would requirebull Enhanced revenue generationbull LGU private sector and civil society supportbull Expansion of microfinance services for the poorbull Pursuit of projects with high economic impactbull Right-sizing the bureaucracybull Privatization andbull Tapping OFW remittances
CROSS-CUTTING CHALLENGES AND
PRIORITIES FOR ACTIONbull Reduce disparities across regions
bull Increase resource allocation for MDG-related programs and projects
bull Enforce fullstricter implementation of laws amp ensure passage of MDG-supportive bills
bull Strengthen monitoring and implementation
bull Scale-up campaign for localization
bull Develop an advocacy plan
bull Intensify multisectoral partnership amp collaboration
Facilitating Factors bull Strong global support for MDGs by the United
Nations ASEAN and other multilateral organizations
bull Expanding national support among policymakers for MDGs (eg creation of the House Committee on MDGs issuance of EO on the MDGs)
bull Prioritization of MDGs in resource allocation (eg focusing of MTPIP investments on MDGs)
bull Increasing awareness and participation of private sector LGUs in MDG-related programs
Hindering Factors
bull Resource constraints (ie MDG financing gap of about $15 billion yearly)
bull Lack of support by creditors for the Debt for MDG ProjectsDebt for Equity in MDG Projects initiative
bull Low budgetary priority for MDGs accorded by some LGUs and
bull Lack of disaggregated data to monitor MDGs at local levels
Parallel Initiatives
Participation in the High-Level Plenary Meeting on MDGs
Formulation of the Plan of Action for Poverty Reduction (2006-2010)Enhance the current Poverty Reduction
Strategy and Program Framework
Advocacy for the Philippine proposal on Debt for Equity in MDG Projects
Implications on the Philippine Economy
MDG attainment would requirebull Enhanced revenue generationbull LGU private sector and civil society supportbull Expansion of microfinance services for the poorbull Pursuit of projects with high economic impactbull Right-sizing the bureaucracybull Privatization andbull Tapping OFW remittances
Facilitating Factors bull Strong global support for MDGs by the United
Nations ASEAN and other multilateral organizations
bull Expanding national support among policymakers for MDGs (eg creation of the House Committee on MDGs issuance of EO on the MDGs)
bull Prioritization of MDGs in resource allocation (eg focusing of MTPIP investments on MDGs)
bull Increasing awareness and participation of private sector LGUs in MDG-related programs
Hindering Factors
bull Resource constraints (ie MDG financing gap of about $15 billion yearly)
bull Lack of support by creditors for the Debt for MDG ProjectsDebt for Equity in MDG Projects initiative
bull Low budgetary priority for MDGs accorded by some LGUs and
bull Lack of disaggregated data to monitor MDGs at local levels
Parallel Initiatives
Participation in the High-Level Plenary Meeting on MDGs
Formulation of the Plan of Action for Poverty Reduction (2006-2010)Enhance the current Poverty Reduction
Strategy and Program Framework
Advocacy for the Philippine proposal on Debt for Equity in MDG Projects
Implications on the Philippine Economy
MDG attainment would requirebull Enhanced revenue generationbull LGU private sector and civil society supportbull Expansion of microfinance services for the poorbull Pursuit of projects with high economic impactbull Right-sizing the bureaucracybull Privatization andbull Tapping OFW remittances
Hindering Factors
bull Resource constraints (ie MDG financing gap of about $15 billion yearly)
bull Lack of support by creditors for the Debt for MDG ProjectsDebt for Equity in MDG Projects initiative
bull Low budgetary priority for MDGs accorded by some LGUs and
bull Lack of disaggregated data to monitor MDGs at local levels
Parallel Initiatives
Participation in the High-Level Plenary Meeting on MDGs
Formulation of the Plan of Action for Poverty Reduction (2006-2010)Enhance the current Poverty Reduction
Strategy and Program Framework
Advocacy for the Philippine proposal on Debt for Equity in MDG Projects
Implications on the Philippine Economy
MDG attainment would requirebull Enhanced revenue generationbull LGU private sector and civil society supportbull Expansion of microfinance services for the poorbull Pursuit of projects with high economic impactbull Right-sizing the bureaucracybull Privatization andbull Tapping OFW remittances
Parallel Initiatives
Participation in the High-Level Plenary Meeting on MDGs
Formulation of the Plan of Action for Poverty Reduction (2006-2010)Enhance the current Poverty Reduction
Strategy and Program Framework
Advocacy for the Philippine proposal on Debt for Equity in MDG Projects
Implications on the Philippine Economy
MDG attainment would requirebull Enhanced revenue generationbull LGU private sector and civil society supportbull Expansion of microfinance services for the poorbull Pursuit of projects with high economic impactbull Right-sizing the bureaucracybull Privatization andbull Tapping OFW remittances
Implications on the Philippine Economy
MDG attainment would requirebull Enhanced revenue generationbull LGU private sector and civil society supportbull Expansion of microfinance services for the poorbull Pursuit of projects with high economic impactbull Right-sizing the bureaucracybull Privatization andbull Tapping OFW remittances