Upload
gary-poole
View
158
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Dalhousie Teaching and Learning Conference Opening Keynote, May 2010
Citation preview
When Students “Move In”
Turning Learning Spaces into Learning Homes
Gary PooleUniversity of British Columbia
Vancouver, Canada
Objectives
• Identify common approaches to understanding learning spaces or homes
• Distinguish between “universalist” and “relativist” portrayals of learners
• Acknowledge what we already know in this field and what we still need to learn
• Apply this knowledge to the notion of a “learning home”
Common approaches to the study of learning spaces
• How people learn
• Unique attributes of the current demographic
Common approaches to the study of learning spaces
• How people learn
• Unique attributes of the current demographic
“It’s not about us, it’s about them.”
- Les Watson, Places and Spaces Seminars, Carrick Institute, September 2007.
Common pattern for talks about learning spaces
• How people learn• Unique attributes of the current
demographic• Pedagogical innovations• Linking to program objectives• Design considerations• Examples
Common pattern for talks about learning spaces
• How people learn Universalist• Unique attributes of the current
demographic Relativist• Pedagogical innovations• Linking to program objectives• Design considerations• Examples
Examples of a Universalist’s Approach
From How People Learn(Bransford et al., 2000)
• Learning is facilitated by connections between the new and the familiar
• Learning is facilitated by “deliberate practice” — salient feedback that draws learner’ focus
• Deep learning (understanding) facilitates transfer• Deep learning is time consuming• Motivation matters
Human beings (universally) are social animals
What happens to humans when they co-exist in the
same space?
“I don’t usually go that fast”
1.5
1.6
1.7
1.8
1.9
2
2.1
2.2
Arthur Earle
UnpacedPaced
“Neither do I!”
Triplett,1898
That’s fine for well-learned performance, but what about
the learning itself?
Slower learning is common in the presence of others
Greenfinches
Medical Students
true for …
Sitting around the same table
Refute the arguments of Plato
Amount written: At the table > aloneQuality of counter-arguments: Alone > at the table
Allport, 1924
The mere presence of others inhibits learning and sophisticated thought.
Physiological Arousal
Evaluation Apprehension
Distraction
Why?
Sitting around the same table
Group learning is a good thing
Sitting around the same table
Group learning is a good thing
Sitting around the same table
Group learning is a good thing
An important distinction when considering humans as Social Animals ...
In the presence of others
From and with others
CO-ACTING
INTERACTING
Social attributes: New to Net Gen?
Educause, Sept/Oct. 2005A classic relativist’s statement
Examples of a Relativist’s Approach
Educause Quarterly, 2005
Examples of a Relativist’s Approach
Adapted from Malcolm Brown, Learning Spaces, in Educating the Net Generation, ed. Diana G. Oblinger and James L. Oblinger
Universal or new?
Increased capacity to maintain concurrent cognitive tasks?
Or shorter attention spans?
A Quick Summary
• We have distinguished between universalist and relativist perspectives regarding learners
• We have distinguished between interacting and co-acting
• NOW, we turn to what we know about learning space design with these concepts in mind
What do we know about learning space design?
• A great deal!
• For example:– Spaces must accommodate co-acting and
interacting– Spaces must provide formal and informal
learning environments
We can design for co-acting ...
... very well
No acting
Co-acting
Interacting
In fact, we can design for co-acting and interacting on a large scale
Durham College/ UOIT computer labs
Things we still have to learn
Interaction in the theatre
The “Parliamentary Room” — Early Conceptions
The Parliamentary Room when it opened
The Parliamentary Room Today
Another Quick Summary
• We have distinguished between universalist and relativist perspectives regarding learners
• We have distinguished between interacting and co-acting
• What we know regarding design• What we need to know — how to use it• NOW, how do students use well-designed
space.
Why are these students moving the furniture?
Because it’s their home
I told you, man ...
This place is for us!
Coming Home
• Where people know who I am– How I am like everyone else (universalist)– How I am unique (relativist)– How my demographic is unique (relativist)
• Where I go to confirm who I am– The modification of space – Place identity
Icons of Place Identity — How you know you are homeIcons of Place Identity
Three key strategies in the design of student-centred learning environments
Tertiary Educational Facility Manager’s Association of Australia
• gain support and acknowledgement at funding level within universities in that student-centred learning spaces must come with a change in facility design.
– And we know how to do that designing– To respond to new attributes and to get right what we have never gotten
right before
• educate the educators / academics in the new teaching methods (teaching accreditation) and in how to best use space (spatial literacy).
– Teachers taking advantage of the interactive capabilities of new spaces.– Giving students a chance to say You missed an ‘A’.
• review architectural briefing processes to better facilitate the design of the new ‘student centred’ environments and conduct Post Occupancy Evaluations (POE’s) on educational environments to learn from what has been done.
– And remember that, when it becomes their home, they will continue the design process!
A Good Learning Home
• Acknowledges identity by adapting to universal learning attributes– Cognitive processes– Social attributes
• Is adaptable by its inhabitants
• Provides recognizable “icons of place identity”