Contemporary Regional Scenarios - Module 2

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  1. 1. + CONTEMPORARY REGIONAL SCENARIOS JAN MAY 2015 LRI. Anglica Ruiz Len
  2. 2. + Module 2 2.1 International Systems 2.2 Centripetal and Centrifugal Forces
  3. 3. + 2.1 International Systems
  4. 4. Models of International System Structures One pole of power. The central power establishes and enforces rules and dominates military and economic instruments. UNIPOLAR Large power Small power Dominant link Short term or potential link 1992 1997 U.S. Dominance
  5. 5. Models of International System Structures Two poles of power. Hostility between the two poles is the main characteristic of a bipolar system. Each of them tries to eliminate the other bloc by undermning it if possible and by fighting it if necessary. The risks are acceptable. In order to increase power it is necessary to bring new members into your bloc, and preventing others from jining the rival bloc. BIPOLAR 1947- 1991 COLD WAR
  6. 6. Triangular relationship. Optimally trying to have good relations with both other players, or minimally try to avoid having hostile relations with both other players. Try to prevent close cooperation between the other two players. TRIPOLAR SYSTEM Prevention of good relations between other two players Models of International System Structures Maybe today EU, USA, Asia
  7. 7. Four or more poles. The rules of the game are to oppose any actor or alliance that threatens to become hegemonic. This is also the central principle of balance-of- power politics. Optimally increase power and minimally preserve power. MULTIPOLAR BALLANCE OF POWER Models of International System Structures 1815 - 1914 Maybe today.
  8. 8. + New World Order Theories After the Cold War (1991 today), there was severe rearrangements in relationships and global power centers; movements that still occur in the present. In the new reality, various theories have emerged about the new world order. We will discuss some of the most relevant
  9. 9. + The end of History -- Fukuyama In 1989, in an article entitled "The End of History" published in "The National Interest" the philosopher Francis Fukuyama argued that, taking into account the fall of the Berlin Wall, the disintegration of the Soviet Union and the gradual entry China the global capitalist economic environment, it was evident that the capitalist liberalism prevailed. It was a matter of time that all countries adopt this model, which would end the great conflict.
  10. 10. + Today, nearly 25 years after the fall of the USSR, it is known that there is no unanimity by the "end of history". The Neoliberalism (or free capitalism) allowed the emergence of prosperous societies, but is still unable to process the number of conflicts that remain. The Global neoliberalism can create as many conflicts as it solves and does not necessarily lead to more prosperous and ordered societies. There are other forces (religious fundamentalism, nationalism) that are outside the traditional ideological confrontations, and whose actions can not process or assimilate neoliberalism easier and faster. The end of History - FAILURES POVERTY PERSISTS IN A FREE CAPITALIST WORLD!!
  11. 11. + Tripolar world This theory stated that the world of the twenty-first century would be defined by the imposed order from three poles of political and military economic power and its peripheral regions of influence. They are based on the importance of trade blocs how the economy is globalized. These three poles are: The American (U.S.A.): the nations of NAFTA Fundamentally USA and Canada, having Latin America as a peripheral region of influence. The European pole: constituted by the European Union, having as peripheral regions of influence to the Balkans, Africa, the Middle East and Russia. The polo Dragons: consisting Japan China South Korea and Taiwan, having as the peripheral regions to the rest of Asia
  12. 12. + The criticisms of this model are multiple: Ignores such place that can occupy India, the second most populous country on earth, where it has been conducting an equivalent to China's economic revolution. Likewise speak of a consolidated in the Far East polo tries to ignore that each of these countries has its own policies and interests China's relations with Japan and Taiwan are often very tense. On the other hand consider that pole like a single, solid entity has no relation to reality. Tripolar world - FAILURES
  13. 13. + The clash of civilization -- Hungtington In 1993 in an article entitled The Clash of Civilizations" in Foreign Affairs, Samuel Huntington argues that the world is divided into cultural and religious backgrounds who have followed different trends and are going to confront in the future. Huntington predicted that the main impact will be between the Christian Western civilization and Islamic civilization.
  14. 14. + The definition of civilizations is questionable, for example Huntington speaks of Latin American civilization without considering the enormous diversity among indigenous majority countries (Bolivia and Guatemala); the mostly mestizos (Mexico) and mostly creoles (Argentina and Chile). Also talking about African civilization is a simplification and failed vision. There is not a theoretical basis for conceptualizing the term civilization, weakening the main approach of the theory. The Civilization concept revolves mainly around religion but also integrates economic elements, Ex: we cant say Latin American civilization is equal to the European- Christian civilization. The clash of civilization -- FAILURES
  15. 15. + As can be seen the three previous theories are not enough to set an accurate vision of the new world order.
  16. 16. + 2.2 Centripetal and Centrifugal Forces
  17. 17. + Centripetal and Centrifugal Forces This model considers that the main contemporary conflicts and structures of the international system depend on the tensions and balances among the countries. According to the physical principles, centrifugal forces are those that tend to disperse, and centripetal forces are those that tend to unite or cohere.
  18. 18. + C&C Forces Model Centripetal Economic blocs Colective security organizations Globalization and neoliberalism Centrifugal Nationalism Alterglobalization Fundamentalism Terrorism
  19. 19. + Centripetal Forces (Integration) Economic blocs: free commere among its memers, lower arancels, markets growth and market diversification. Free flow of merchandise, investment, services and sometimes populations.
  20. 20. +Collective security organizations: The only collective security organization that persists nowadays is NATO (North Atlantic Treaty Organization) formed by the USA, Canada and Western Europe. During the Cold War, Warsaw Pact was another example. The first effective military operation for NATO was a collective attack in Afghanistan after Sept. 11, 2001. Today, many critics say there is no need for the existence of NATO, since its major enemy (Warsaw Pact) has disappeared.
  21. 21. + Globalization and neoliberalism: The concept of Globalization includes many aspects of the contemporary life, such as economics, culture, society and politics. Lifestyles standardization Global instant communications Cultural manifestations: music, cinema, Consumerism and products expansion Massive expression of public opinion Global markets
  22. 22. + Nationalism: it is the seek of a nation for creating their own state or to be recognized with an especific status. Sesession: a nation or territory pretends to separate from a state, in order to create a new independent state Quebec in Canada Irredetism: a states tries to incorporate populations of its same nation (culture), that are located in another country Chechenia in Pakistan / India Autonomism: a nation pretends to have a special status, acording to its characteristics (culture) but without trying to become an independent country. Kurds in Turkey Tamils in Sri Lanka CENTRIFUGAL FORCES (Dispersion)
  23. 23. + Alterglobalism: it considers that there is not a single globalized world, but there is a diversity of traditions and lifestiles. Big Multinationals (MNCs) are devasting the world resources. Defend diversity: cultural, lingistic, biodiversity, and even food diversity.. Protests against the most powerful countries. Tend to be anarquical and against industrialization.
  24. 24. + Fundamentalism: strict interpretation of the religious or ideological texts. It includes also political intentions. Christian fundamentalism Muslim fundamentalism Marxism Terrorism: It works as a tool or a way for a small group of individuals that pretend political interests and use violence in order to get them. Generally attack against civilians, with the interest of creating a state of panic, and taking control of their institutions.