20
by UMESHA NAIK Lecturer Department of Library and Information Science Mangalore University Mangalagangothri 574 199 [email protected] and D. SHIVALINGAIAH Professor Department of Library and Information Science Mangalore University Mangalagangothri 574 199 [email protected] Comparative Study of Web 1.0, Web 2.0 and Web 3.0

Comparative study of web 1, Web 2 and Web 3

  • Upload
    dlis-mu

  • View
    79

  • Download
    4

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Paper presented at the 6th International CALIBER 2008 International Conference on From Automation to Transformation. University of Allahabad, Allahabad, 28 to 29, February and 1 March, 2008

Citation preview

Page 1: Comparative study of web 1, Web 2 and Web 3

by

UMESHA NAIKLecturer

Department of Library and Information ScienceMangalore University

Mangalagangothri 574 [email protected]

and

D. SHIVALINGAIAHProfessor

Department of Library and Information Science Mangalore University

Mangalagangothri 574 [email protected]

Comparative Study of Web 1.0, Web 2.0 and Web 3.0

Page 2: Comparative study of web 1, Web 2 and Web 3

IntroductionApplication Programming Interface

User views web pages

1989 - Sir Tim Berners-Lee,

Web 1.0 - Netscape

Web 2.0 – It is not the software that enables the web

Web 3.0 - more intelligent and microcontent

Page 3: Comparative study of web 1, Web 2 and Web 3

Web 1.0

First implementation of the web

Small number of writers and large number of User / readers

Hypertext documents accessed via the Internet.

Berners-Lee - read-only web

Page 4: Comparative study of web 1, Web 2 and Web 3

Web 2.0

Technologies such as weblogs (blogs), social book marking, wikis, podcasts, RSS feeds. social software, web APIs, and online web services- eBay and Gmail.

Tim O’Reilly popularized web 2.0

web 2.0 services are expected to replace desktop computing applications for many purposes

Read-write

Berners-Lee's method

Page 5: Comparative study of web 1, Web 2 and Web 3

Web 2.0 Website Types Audio BlogPod Blogging Book marking Calendars Chats Collaboration Communication Community CRM (Customer Relationship Management)

E-commerce E-learning E-mail

Filesharing Forums Games Images Knowledge Base Lists Mapping Mashups Multi-media Portals RSS (Rich Site Summary)

Wiki

Page 6: Comparative study of web 1, Web 2 and Web 3

Web 3.0 Read-write-execute

Web into a database

High quality content & services produced

Multiple non-browser applications

Artificial intelligence technologies

The Semantic web, the Geospatial Web, or the 3D web

Tim Berners-Lee coined Giant Global Graph (GGG) as another facet of Web 3.0

Page 7: Comparative study of web 1, Web 2 and Web 3

Web 2.0 based websites Flickr

Orkut

YouTube

Blogs

Google AD sense

Wikipedia

Scribd

Page 8: Comparative study of web 1, Web 2 and Web 3

Comparison between web 1.0, web 2.0 and web 3.0

Page 9: Comparative study of web 1, Web 2 and Web 3

Web 1.0 Web 2.0 Web 3.0

1996 2006 2016

The Web The Social Web The Semantic Web

Tim Berners Lee

Tim O'Reilly Sir Tim Berners Lee

Read only web Read and write web

Read, write and execute web

Information sharing

Interaction Immersion.

Page 10: Comparative study of web 1, Web 2 and Web 3

Million of users Billion of users Trillion of users

Ecosystem Participation Understanding itself

Connect information

Connect people Connect knowledge

Brain and Eyes (= Information)

Brain, Eyes, Ears, Voice and Heart (= Passion)

Brain, Eyes, Ears, Voice, Heart, Arms and Legs (= Freedom

The Hypertext/CGI Web. (the basics)

The Community Web (for people: apps/sites connecting them).

The Semantic Web (for machines).

Page 11: Comparative study of web 1, Web 2 and Web 3

Companies publish content that people consume (e.g. CNN)

People publish content that other people can consume, companies build platforms that let people publish content for other people (e.g. Flickr, YouTube, Adsense, Wikipedia, Blogger, MySpace, RSS, Digg)

People build applications that other people can interact with, companies build platforms that let people publish services by leveraging the associations between people or special content (e.g. FaceBook, Google Maps, My Yahoo!)

Page 12: Comparative study of web 1, Web 2 and Web 3

Pushed web, text/graphics based flash

Two way web pages, Wikis, video, pod casts, shading, Personal publishing, 2D portals

3D portals, avtar representation, Interoperable profits, multi-user virtual environment (MUVEs), Integrated games, education and business, all media flows in and out of virtual Web worlds

Page 13: Comparative study of web 1, Web 2 and Web 3

Companies publish content that people consume (e.g. CNN)

People publish content that other people can consume, companies build platforms that let people publish content for other people (e.g. Flickr, YouTube, Adsense, Wikipedia, Blogger, MySpace, RSS, Digg)

People build applications that other people can interact with, companies build platforms that let people publish services (e.g. FaceBook, Google Maps, My Yahoo!)

Page 14: Comparative study of web 1, Web 2 and Web 3

SE retrieve macro contents. Search is very fast but many times results are inaccurate or more than users can chew.

SE retrieve tags with micro contents. Tags everything: pictures, links, events, news, Blogs, audio, video, and so on. Google Base even retrieves micro content texts.

SE will hopefully retrieve micro content texts which were tagged automatically. Billions of Web 1.0 macro contents into micro contents.

Page 15: Comparative study of web 1, Web 2 and Web 3

Web 1.0 was all about static content, one way publishing of content without any real interaction between readers or publishers or each other.

Web 2.0 is more about 2 way communication through social networking, blogging, wikis, tagging, user generated content and video.

Web 3.0 is curiusly undefined. AI and the web learning what you want and delivering you a personalized web experience.

Page 16: Comparative study of web 1, Web 2 and Web 3

The web in the beginning when it was first developing web 1.0

New advances that allow a much more sophisticated user interaction with web pages – citizen journalism, social networks and Wikis are all products of Web 2.0

Thought to be the future - where the web is more interactive with users, leading to a kind of artificial intelligence web 3.0

Page 17: Comparative study of web 1, Web 2 and Web 3

Personal web sites

Blogs Semantic Blogs: SemiBlog, Haystack, Semblog, Structured Blogging

Content Management system

Wikis, Wikipedia

Semantic Wikis: Semantic MediaWiki, SemperWiki, Platypus, dbpedia, Rhizome

AltaVista, Google

Google personalized, DumpFind, Hakia

Semantic Search: SWSE, Swoogle, Intellidimension(Search Engine for Semantic Web)

Page 18: Comparative study of web 1, Web 2 and Web 3

Citeseer, Project Gutenberg

Google scholar, Book search

Semantic Digital Libraries: JeromDl, BRICKS, Longwell(Building Resources for Integrated Cultural Knowledge Services)

Message boards

Community portals

Semantic Forums and community portals: SIOC, OpenLink DataSpaces(Semantically-Interlinked Online Communities)

Buddy Lists, Address book

Online social networks

Semantic Social Networks: FOAF, (Friend of a friend)

People Aggregator

Page 19: Comparative study of web 1, Web 2 and Web 3

Conclusion

Web offers so many opportunities

Semantic Web (Web 3.0) promises to “organize the world’s information”

Web 2.0 are far-reaching- socially, culturally, and even politically.

Designers and developers

Different forms of language

Page 20: Comparative study of web 1, Web 2 and Web 3

THANK YOU