57
Collective Intelligence for OER Sustainability 1 Simon Buckingham Shum & Anna De Liddo OLnet Project, Knowledge Media Institute Open University UK Open Education 2010, Barcelona http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/uk

Collective Intelligence for OER Sustainability

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Simon Buckingham Shum & Anna De Liddo OLnet Project, Knowledge Media Institute, Open University UK

Citation preview

Page 1: Collective Intelligence for OER Sustainability

Collective Intelligence for OER Sustainability

1

Simon Buckingham Shum & Anna De Liddo

OLnet Project, Knowledge Media Institute Open University UK

Open Education 2010, Barcelona

http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/uk

Page 2: Collective Intelligence for OER Sustainability

OLnetaimstosearchouttheevidencefor

useandreuseofOERand

buildacollec7veintelligence

infrastructurethatmakesthisavisible,andevolvingmapofthemovement’s

knowledgeandopenchallenges

olnet.org

Page 3: Collective Intelligence for OER Sustainability

Examples of OER Collective Intelligence

  The following tend to be adoption obstacles for OER in Africa…

  OER xyz failed to transfer to a new context because…

  There appear to be 5 main strategies to OER sustainability, of which only 2 have robust evidence…

  The following arguments for OER have proven most compelling to state educational boards…

  Successful OER initiatives seem to share these competencies in the core team…

Page 4: Collective Intelligence for OER Sustainability

Examples of OER evidence

4

Page 5: Collective Intelligence for OER Sustainability

OER Sustainability

5

Page 6: Collective Intelligence for OER Sustainability

~ Sustainability as a

property of ecosystems

6

OER Sustainability

Page 7: Collective Intelligence for OER Sustainability

Sustainability Resilience Resilience Thinking Resilience Platforms OER Threats/Opps OER Collective Intelligence

7

Complexity

Line of argument…

Page 8: Collective Intelligence for OER Sustainability

Resilience

  Walker, et al. (2004) define resilience as

“the capacity of a system to absorb disturbance and reorganize while undergoing change, so as to still

retain essentially the same function, structure, identity, and feedbacks”

8

Page 9: Collective Intelligence for OER Sustainability

Resilience in Socio-Ecological Systems   Walker, B., C. S. Holling, S. R. Carpenter, and A. Kinzig. 2004. Resilience, adaptability and transformability in

social–ecological systems. Ecology and Society, 9, (2): 5. http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol9/iss2/art5

9

Fig. 1a. Three-dimensional stability landscape with two basins of attraction showing, in one basin, the current position of the system and three aspects of resilience, L = latitude, R = resistance, Pr = precariousness.

Latitude: the maximum amount the system can be changed before losing its ability to recover

Resistance: the ease or difficulty of changing the system

Precariousness: the current trajectory of the system, and how close it currently is to a limit or “threshold”

Page 10: Collective Intelligence for OER Sustainability

Resilience in Socio-Ecological Systems   Walker, B., C. S. Holling, S. R. Carpenter, and A. Kinzig. 2004. Resilience, adaptability and transformability in

social–ecological systems. Ecology and Society, 9, (2): 5. http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol9/iss2/art5

10

Fig. 1b. Changes in the stability landscape have resulted in a contraction of the basin the system was in and an expansion of the alternate basin. Without itself changing, the system has changed basins.

It may not yet be possible to model a human community in such quantitative

terms, but the broader principles of Resilience Thinking apply to non-ecological systems more clearly

Page 11: Collective Intelligence for OER Sustainability

Resilience

11

http://www.futureofed.org/driver/Platforms-for-Resilience.aspx

“System shocks and disruptions in the arenas of energy, finance, climate, and health care are key forces of destabilization in this century.

Institutional strategies that focus on resisting disruption and maintaining the status quo will not offer sufficient responses.”

Page 12: Collective Intelligence for OER Sustainability

Resilience Thinking (explosion of resources on this)   A resilient world (Walker, 2008)…

12

promotes biological, landscape, social and economic diversity

embraces and works with natural ecological cycles

consists of modular components

possesses tight feedbacks

promotes trust, well developed social networks and leadership

places an emphasis on learning, experimentation, locally developed rules, and embracing change

has institutions with "redundancy" in governance structures

mixes common and private property with overlapping access rights

considers all nature’s un-priced services

Page 13: Collective Intelligence for OER Sustainability

Resilience Thinking   A resilient world (Walker, 2008)…

13

promotes biological, landscape, social and

economic diversity Diversity is a major source of future options and of a

system's capacity to respond to change.

Page 14: Collective Intelligence for OER Sustainability

Resilience Thinking   A resilient world (Walker, 2008)…

14

embraces and works with natural ecological cycles

A forest that is never allowed to burn loses its fire-resistant species and becomes very vulnerable to

fire.

Page 15: Collective Intelligence for OER Sustainability

Resilience Thinking   A resilient world (Walker, 2008)…

15

consists of modular components

When over-connected, shocks are rapidly transmitted through the system - as a forest

connected by logging roads can allow a wild fire to spread wider than it would otherwise.

Page 16: Collective Intelligence for OER Sustainability

Resilience Thinking   A resilient world (Walker, 2008)…

16

possesses tight feedbacks Feedbacks allow us to detect thresholds before we

cross them. Globalization is leading to delayed feedbacks that were once tighter. For example,

people of the developed world receive weak feedback signals about the consequences of their

consumption.

Page 17: Collective Intelligence for OER Sustainability

Resilience Thinking   A resilient world (Walker, 2008)…

17

promotes trust, well developed social networks

and leadership Individually, these attributes contribute to what is generally termed "social capital," but they need to

act in concert to effect adaptability - the capacity to respond to change and disturbance.

Page 18: Collective Intelligence for OER Sustainability

Resilience Thinking   A resilient world (Walker, 2008)…

18

places an emphasis on learning, experimentation,

locally developed rules, and embracing change

When rigid connections and behaviors are broken, new opportunities open up and new resources are

made available for growth.

Page 19: Collective Intelligence for OER Sustainability

Resilience Thinking   A resilient world (Walker, 2008)…

19

has institutions with "redundancy" in governance

structures Redundancy in institutions increases the diversity of

responses and the flexibility of a system.

Page 20: Collective Intelligence for OER Sustainability

Resilience Thinking   A resilient world (Walker, 2008)…

20

mixes common and private property with overlapping

access rights Because access and property rights lie at the heart of many resource-use tragedies, overlapping rights

and a mix of common and private property rights can enhance the resilience of linked social-ecological

systems.

Page 21: Collective Intelligence for OER Sustainability

Resilience Thinking   A resilient world (Walker, 2008)…

21

considers all nature’s un-priced services

– such as carbon storage, water filtration and so on - in development proposals and assessments. These services are often the ones that change in a regime

shift – and are often only recognized and appreciated when they are lost.

Page 22: Collective Intelligence for OER Sustainability

Resilience Platforms

22

http://www.futureofed.org/driver/Platforms-for-Resilience.aspx

Page 23: Collective Intelligence for OER Sustainability

Resilience Platforms

23

http://www.futureofed.org/driver/Platforms-for-Resilience.aspx

Creating flexibility and innovation amid system failures

“Platforms for resilience - enabling responsive flexibility, distributed collaboration, and transparency - will allow institutions to meet such challenges through innovation, adaptation, and openness.”

Page 24: Collective Intelligence for OER Sustainability

Resilience in knowledge-intensive ecosystems

24

When knowledge and understanding are key variables in the system, resilience depends on the capacity for learning

e.g. awareness of discrepant evidence, critical practice, reflection and dialogue when confronted by challenges or shocks to the system.

Page 25: Collective Intelligence for OER Sustainability

Resilience Thinking: OER opportunities + threats

25

Threat to established educational paradigm?

(Opportunity for OER/Open Social Learning?)

Page 26: Collective Intelligence for OER Sustainability

Resilience Thinking: OER opportunities + threats

26

Threat to established educational paradigm?

(Opportunity for OER/Open Social Learning?)

Page 27: Collective Intelligence for OER Sustainability

Resilience Thinking: OER opportunities + threats

27

Threat to OER/Open Social Learning?

Threat to established educational paradigm?

(Opportunity for OER/Open Social Learning?)

Page 28: Collective Intelligence for OER Sustainability

Resilience Thinking: OER opportunities + threats

28

Public doc on SBS blog: http://people.kmi.open.ac.uk/sbs/2010/10/resilience-thinking-edu

Page 29: Collective Intelligence for OER Sustainability

Resilience Thinking: OER opportunities + threats

29

Public doc on SBS blog: http://people.kmi.open.ac.uk/sbs/2010/10/resilience-thinking-edu

Page 30: Collective Intelligence for OER Sustainability

Collective Intelligence for resilience?

30

Page 31: Collective Intelligence for OER Sustainability

Collective Intelligence for resilience?

31 Sources include: Weick (1995); Kurtz & Snowden (2003); Browning, L. and Boudès, T. (2005); Hagel et al (2010)

Page 32: Collective Intelligence for OER Sustainability

Collective Intelligence for resilience?

32 Sources include: Weick (1995); Kurtz & Snowden (2003); Browning, L. and Boudès, T. (2005); Hagel et al (2010)

Page 33: Collective Intelligence for OER Sustainability

the key idea…

sensemaking revolves around conversations

perspective and context are key: we don’t always agree

contested collective intelligence

33

Towards an OER Collective Intelligence Infrastructure

Page 34: Collective Intelligence for OER Sustainability

How can we pool the OER evidence base and debate open issues?...

34

Page 35: Collective Intelligence for OER Sustainability

How can we pool the OER evidence base and debate open issues?...

35

Page 36: Collective Intelligence for OER Sustainability

How can we pool the OER evidence base and debate open issues?...

36

interpretation

interpretation

interpretation

interpretation

Page 37: Collective Intelligence for OER Sustainability

How can we pool the OER evidence base and debate open issues?...

37

interpretation

interpretation interpretation

interpretation

interpretation

(a hunch – no grounding

evidence yet)

interpretation

Page 38: Collective Intelligence for OER Sustainability

How can we pool the OER evidence base and debate open issues?...

38

predicts causes

interpretation

interpretation interpretation

interpretation

interpretation

(a hunch – no grounding

evidence yet)

interpretation

Is pre-requisite for

Page 39: Collective Intelligence for OER Sustainability

How can we pool the OER evidence base and debate open issues?...

39

prevents

predicts causes

interpretation

interpretation interpretation

interpretation

interpretation

(a hunch – no grounding

evidence yet) Is inconsistent with

interpretation

challenges

Is pre-requisite for

Page 40: Collective Intelligence for OER Sustainability

Building the story that makes sense of the evidence… i.e. plausible narrative and arguments

40

Question

Answer

Supporting Argument…

Challenging Argument…

challenges supports

responds to

Assumption

motivates

Page 41: Collective Intelligence for OER Sustainability

Building the story that makes sense of the evidence… i.e. plausible narrative and arguments

41

Question

Answer

Supporting Argument…

Challenging Argument…

challenges supports

responds to

Hunch

motivates

Page 42: Collective Intelligence for OER Sustainability

Building the story that makes sense of the evidence… i.e. plausible narrative and arguments

42

Question

Answer

Supporting Argument…

Challenging Argument…

challenges supports

responds to

Data

motivates

Page 43: Collective Intelligence for OER Sustainability

43

http://cohere.open.ac.uk

Convergence of… web annotation social bookmarking concept mapping structured debate

a prototype infrastructure for collective intelligence/social learning

Page 44: Collective Intelligence for OER Sustainability

Structured deliberation and debate in which Questions, Evidence and Connections are first class entities (linkable, addressable, embeddable, contestable…)

44

Page 45: Collective Intelligence for OER Sustainability

45

Structured deliberation and debate in which Questions, Evidence and Connections are first class entities (linkable, addressable, embeddable, contestable…)

Page 46: Collective Intelligence for OER Sustainability

Analyst-defined visual connection language

46

Page 47: Collective Intelligence for OER Sustainability

47

Structured deliberation and debate in which Questions, Evidence and Connections are first class entities (linkable, addressable, embeddable, contestable…)

Page 48: Collective Intelligence for OER Sustainability

— web annotation of OER (Firefox extension)

Page 49: Collective Intelligence for OER Sustainability

seeing the connections people make as they annotate the web using Cohere

Visualizing all the connections that a set of analysts have made

— but unfiltered, this may not be very helpful

Page 50: Collective Intelligence for OER Sustainability

Visualizing multiple learners’ interpretations of global

warming sources

Connections have been filtered by a set of semantic

relationships grouped as Consistency

— semantic filtering of connections

De Liddo, A. and Buckingham Shum, S. (2010). Cohere: A prototype for contested collective intelligence. In: ACM Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW 2010) - Workshop: Collective Intelligence In Organizations, February 6-10, 2010, Savannah, Georgia, USA. http://oro.open.ac.uk/19554

Page 51: Collective Intelligence for OER Sustainability

— web annotation for sensemaking

Page 52: Collective Intelligence for OER Sustainability

Social Network

Social Discourse Network

Concept Network

Page 53: Collective Intelligence for OER Sustainability

— geospatial mashup of ideas

Nodes in the semantic network containing

geolocation data can be visualized in Google Maps

Page 54: Collective Intelligence for OER Sustainability

— timeline viz. mashup of ideas

Nodes in the semantic network containing temporal data can be visualized in MIT

Simile’s timeline

Page 55: Collective Intelligence for OER Sustainability

A large scale OER CI exercise: Are you on the map? (whose map?...)

  120 OER project reports from Hewlett Foundation   What is the evidence base around OER impact?   What are the unresolved questions that help set the

roadmap?   Reports analysed by OER researchers and via

computational linguistics engine… …feeding into a set of multi-dimensional

interactive knowledge maps   To be shared with the OER community Spring 2011,

inviting mass participation to update the evidence base, and create a living conversation, generating dynamic maps that we can collectively own

55

Page 56: Collective Intelligence for OER Sustainability

Sustainability Resilience Resilience Thinking Resilience Platforms OER Threats/Opps OER Collective Intelligence

56

Complexity

Summary

Page 57: Collective Intelligence for OER Sustainability

In more detail… articles, books, news, movies, software, community…

57

http://cohere.open.ac.uk

http://projects.kmi.open.ac.uk/hyperdiscourse

http://OLnet.org