Upload
natalie-harvey
View
2.165
Download
2
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Natalie SapkarovEPSY 430, section 4April 10, 2008
Case Study Analysis: Identity Development in Joan and Ann
Adolescence could be considered by some to be the most chaotic and
tumultuous stage of the human life cycle. Change is occurring in every
aspect of adolescents’ lives: biologically, socially, cognitively, and
emotionally. With these various changes comes the need to shape one’s
identity, to become someone with distinctive and distinguishable
characteristics. Working with the definition of identity as “a fairly stable
sense of who you are that seems to be shared by significant people in your
life and is expressed in various roles” (Ryan), I will examine two adolescents,
Joan Garcia and Ann Smith from Patricia Hersch’s case studies in A Tribe
Apart, and the ways in which their identities are created, supported, and
fostered through their environments and their social networks. Although Joan
and Ann share similar influences in their lives, expressed through their
shared interest in the school newspaper and their turbulent home lives, their
identities are uniquely shaped by their personal experiences and coping
strategies.
Joan and Ann know each other from working on the school newspaper
together. Although they are not necessarily friends, they work well together
to meet their deadlines, and they both have a passion for the newspaper.
Ann’s passion comes from within: “it is something I feel really strongly about:
Sapkarov
reporting what happens. People have a right to know what’s going on. I want
to be a part of that’” (Hersch 112). Ann’s enthusiasm for the newspaper
represents the psychological aspect of identity development, having a
“stable sense of who you are” (Ryan), as Ann knows what she is deeply
interested in and she pursues it actively. The same is true for Joan, though
her passion for the paper has more to do with feeling a sense of place and
belonging within her school and being able to express her thoughts and
opinions publicly (Hersch 112). As both of these girls develop their interest in
the school newspaper, they are also developing a part of their adolescent
identities by taking control and exploring their interests. As members of a
collaborative newspaper team, they (as well as the rest of the newspaper
staff, and especially Mr. Ward, their journalism teacher) nurture each other
by providing support to develop this interest, since they are sharing this
experience. They both understand the pressures and thrills of working on the
newspaper and are able to both commiserate and celebrate their pitfalls and
triumphs together.
Another key similarity between Joan and Ann is represented in their
home environments. Because they both have younger siblings and they both
have caregiver relationships with their siblings (Arnett, “Family” 190), Joan
and Ann often have adult responsibilities such as knowing where their
siblings are and that they’re safe as well as household chores such as
cooking and cleaning. This affects their identity development because it
forces them to “grow up” at a much quicker pace, imposing more changes
2
Sapkarov
than are usual for adolescent development, which is already a stressful
enough time as it is. When it comes to their parents, Joan and Ann both have
authoritarian parents who have exceedingly demanding expectations of their
daughters, showing little support or affection (Arnett, “Family” 194). Ann is
luckier, however, as she has a second family consisting of her father and
stepmother, though they live far away, who actually do support and care for
her. Even though the two girls hold these characteristics in common, Joan
and Ann develop unique identities, owing to their personal experiences as
individuals.
Joan lives with her father and younger brother, moving to Reston after
her mother abandoned the family when Joan was only ten years old (Hersch
210). From this point, “Joan was expected to become the woman of the
house, to clean, cook, and take care of her little brother” (Hersch 210). Her
father kept her isolated in the house, not allowing her to go out with friends,
and busied her with household chores that were meant for women (Hersch
210). Her father not only expected Joan to come home after school to take
care of her brother and the other household duties, but he also did not offer
her any encouragement or affection. As a key player in her identity
formation, Joan’s father took a backseat in supporting his daughter and
instead relied on her to support the family in various ways. Because her
mother was also absent, Joan had no adult family member to go to with her
stresses and problems. Therefore, as Joan was negotiating the multiple and
complex aspects of her emerging identity, she only had herself as a support
3
Sapkarov
system, which is certainly not enough considering the amount of change she
was going through.
Joan’s early adolescence was spent in isolation when she most longed
for friends. In fact, “friends become increasingly important people during
adolescence—the source of adolescents' happiest experiences, the people
with whom they feel most comfortable, the ones they feel they can talk to
most openly” (Arnett, “Friends” 225), but Joan was not able to develop this
type of intimate relationship. Her peer influences on her identity consisted of
acquaintances she had at school, people she could not open up to and
people who she felt separate from. By not having this normally positive
adolescent experience, Joan missed out on having that support from close
friends in forming and fostering her identity. Because she relied on herself,
Joan had to learn how to cope with her situation.
Over time she came up with a solution. The problem, as she saw it, was that she had taken whatever life dished out. No more. She decided she was going to fight back. When she was twelve, she moved to Reston with her father and brother. ‘It was an opportunity for me to make a whole new person of myself.’ (Hersch 210-1)
Her solution, however, was not the most productive nor the most well-
adjusted response to her situation in life. She lashed out her anger at people,
bullying kids at school, and starting fights. She put on a “tough girl” attitude
and no one dared mess with her. For a time, Joan tried on the identity of this
hard, carefree, violent girl, which represents the behavioral aspect of
identity, that which is “expressed in various roles” (Ryan). But after an
incident with a boy at school where she pushed the limits of how much she
4
Sapkarov
could hurt people, Joan had a change of heart and decided to cast this bad
attitude aside and begin exploring who she really is because “if adolescence
is about trying on different identities, maybe it was time for her to be
someone else” (Hersch 212). During this time, Joan enlisted the support of
an old friend from middle school, who “became a lifeline” and “got her
through her transition” (Hersch 213-4). Joan finally had someone in her life
who would care for, support, and nurture her in her pursuit of figuring out
her true identity. What, then, was the outcome of this early adolescent’s
identity searching process?
In the last months of her freshman year, the real Joan began to emerge. She started dressing in long skirts and Indian tops. She changed her hairstyle […] She stayed true to herself, communicating in kinder ways, smiling more, doing things for people, and pretty soon she developed a new set of closer, more gentle friends. (Hersch 214)
It seems as though Joan has successfully navigated her identity voyage and
become the person she wants to be. I will note briefly, however, that Joan’s
journey does not in fact end here and instead takes her through a whole new
set of rollercoaster rides, with a bout of depression and attempted suicide,
common to teenage girls in her circumstances (Steinberg 464). For the sake
of this analysis’ purpose, though, I will move on to Ann’s identity process.
Ann’s home life is just as stressful as Joan’s. Instead of an absentee
mother, Ann has a control-freak of a mom. Her parents are divorced (and
both remarried), but her father lives in Florida, so Ann doesn’t get to see him
as often as she would like. Her mother, like Joan’s father, has high
expectations of Ann, not allowing her to be on the cross country team
5
Sapkarov
because her grades weren’t good enough (Hersch 313). Ann also has to
constantly worry about her younger sister Courtney, also in high school,
because her mom expects her to know her whereabouts at all times. She has
never received any encouragement from her mother and is either being
neglected or put down. She is not given any freedom but is supposed to
assume adult responsibilities. In regard to Ann’s identity development, “in
the optimal situation, parents will reinforce and stimulate this process of
growing autonomy, self-determination, and independence” (Eccles et al. 97)
—it is clear, however, that Ann does not live in this ideal environment. Her
home environment is best described in this passage:
Theirs is a home where everybody lives together separately, the lines of demarcation drawn by the parents. They generally eat individually […] The house is staked out into territories for the children and the adults […] There is no place they feel at home except their bedrooms, and even there their mom feels free to intrude and snoop at will. (Hersch 201-2)
Suffice to say, Ann’s family, the people who she lives with, is not supporting
Ann’s identity development in any positive way, if only to provide an
example of who not to be.
This is puzzling, though, because Ann actually has a very strong
personality and seems to know exactly who she is and who she wants to be.
She has firm opinions and wonderful nurturing qualities that her mother
certainly doesn’t have—where did they come from? Ann “thinks she learned
to be loving and nurturing from her grandparents” (Hersch 203), and she
also has a great relationship with her dad. She has a steady boyfriend, Ron,
of two years, who has been a source of conflict with her mom because of his
6
Sapkarov
race, but mostly has had a positive impact on her life because he is someone
she can talk to and be intimate with (Hersch 195). Because Ann does not like
to be at home, she spends much of her time babysitting and has developed
good relationships with the parents of the children she sits for, who offer her
encouragement and kind words (Hersch 322). Ann also has several good
girlfriends, most notably Linda, “who’s been with her through thick and thin,”
consoling her when her home life was unbearable and offering solace to her
worries (Hersch 322). With all of these supportive influences in Ann’s life, it is
no surprise that she has developed a clear sense of who she is: nurturing,
dependable, strong-willed, caring, and outspoken. Looking at the behavioral
aspect of Ann’s identity, that which is “expressed in various roles” (Ryan),
we can see these traits evidenced in her diligence and love for babysitting,
her willingness to help her friends in any situation such as scheduling an
abortion (Hersch 196-200), and her work on the school newspaper.
After reviewing the psychological and behavioral aspects of these two
girls’ identities, it is time to look at the social aspect, that which is “shared
by people in your life” (Ryan). Because the girls know each other and are a
part of each other’s lives, I thought to demonstrate this concept by showing
what each girl thinks of the other. When Ann describes Joan, she says that
she is:
a very nice person, and great listener. She is extremely sweet and nonjudgmental. That is why everybody finds it easy to get along with her, although, she is a little environmental and that bothers people after awhile, but that is just one of her quirks like we all have. (Hersch 105-6)
7
Sapkarov
Joan comments that Ann “didn’t take bullshit from people and told it like it
is,” which is close to how Ann thinks others see her (Hersch 106). Although
these are only small bits of the girls’ identities, they seem to be stable
enough that they are being conveyed to the people in, even those on the
outskirts of, their lives.
Identity development in adolescence is a complex process, intertwined
with the everydayness of adolescent development and influenced by
anything and everything important to adolescents. Joan and Ann shared
many of the same influences in their lives, but they grew as two separate
individuals, coping with their situations differently and growing into two very
different adolescent girls. From the shared interest of being on the school
newspaper and similar home environments, Joan and Ann branched out into
their own worlds and dealt with different situations, contributing to their
process of identity formation. Because Ann had more positive influences in
her life, namely more positive people to nurture and support her, her identity
seemed to flourish and then stabilize throughout the course of this case
study. Unfortunately, Joan experienced a bit more turbulence in her life, and
even though she did reach a point where she could learn to be herself, she
did suffer from depression, unable to cope with the changes in her life. The
process, however, does not end at the close of this study. Identity
development, I believe, is an ongoing practice, as identities fluctuate and
naturally, people change. After all, it is the process and the influences in our
lives which make us who we are.
8
Sapkarov
Works Cited
Arnett, Jeffrey Jensen. “Family Relationships.” Adolescence and Emerging Adulthood: A
Cultural Approach. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 2001. 185-200.
---. “Friends and Peers.” Adolescence and Emerging Adulthood: A Cultural Approach. Upper
Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 2001. 225-236.
Eccles, Jacquelynne S., et al. “Development During Adolescence: The Impact of Stage-
Environment Fit on Young Adolescents’ Experience in Schools and in Families.” American Psychologist. 48 (1993): 90-101.
Hersch, Patricia. A Tribe Apart: A Journey into the Heart of American Adolescence. New York:
Ballantine, 1998.
Ryan, Allison. Identity development lecture. Mumford Hall, University of Illinois at
Urbana-Champaign. 14 Feb. 2008.
Steinberg, Laurence. “Psychosocial Problems in Adolescence.” Adolescence. New York:
McGraw Hill, 2008. 434-469.
9