30
The Impact on Business Continuity of Buncefield and Eyjafjallajökull David Alexander University College London

Business Continuity Management: Buncefield and Iceland

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

 

Citation preview

Page 1: Business Continuity Management: Buncefield and Iceland

The Impact on Business Continuity of Buncefield and Eyjafjallajökull

David Alexander University College London

Page 2: Business Continuity Management: Buncefield and Iceland

The ingredients of resilience

Redund

ancy

Attitude

Part

icipation

Adaptability

...and communication

Page 3: Business Continuity Management: Buncefield and Iceland

CRISIS

OPERATIONS (ACHIEVEMENTS) REPUTATION

Perception

Communication

Concrete developments

• positive • negative

Page 4: Business Continuity Management: Buncefield and Iceland

failed succeeded

positive negative

unknown, hidden known, publicised perceived not perceived

Crisis management as a combination of management of events and management of reputation

Inside influences Resilience of organisation Crisis management capability

Outside influences Resilience of system

External factors: "force majeure"

REPUTATION

ACHIEVEMENTS

Page 5: Business Continuity Management: Buncefield and Iceland

Civil contingencies

Resilience

management

The risk environment

Business continuity

Civil protection

Civil defence

Page 6: Business Continuity Management: Buncefield and Iceland

Buncefield

Page 7: Business Continuity Management: Buncefield and Iceland

The fire burned for three and a half days

Explosion and fire at an oil storage depot, Buncefield, Hertfordshire, United Kingdom

Sunday 11 December 2005, 0602 hrs

Page 8: Business Continuity Management: Buncefield and Iceland

Motorways

Oil storage depot (22 tanks) Business park

Residential area

Entrance to site

Page 9: Business Continuity Management: Buncefield and Iceland

The effects of the explosion extended 3 km with damage to 1000 houses and 300 companies.

Page 10: Business Continuity Management: Buncefield and Iceland

Interruption of traffic circulation, of commercial activities for 300 firms, and to the lives of 3,500 people.

Page 11: Business Continuity Management: Buncefield and Iceland

Effects on the nearby commercial area.

Page 12: Business Continuity Management: Buncefield and Iceland

According to a study by the London Chamber of Commerce, started in 2003 and updated ever since:-

• 80% of commercial companies that do not have a well-structured emergency plan risk bankruptcy within one year of suffering a major incident or disaster

• 90% or companies that suffer major losses go into liquidation within two years

Page 13: Business Continuity Management: Buncefield and Iceland

• 43% of companies that suffer the effects of disaster never recover their market position

• In the United Kingdom, half of commercial companies have no contingency plan (data unchanged from 2003 to 2006)

• in the United Kingdom one company in 500 per year suffers a disaster.

Page 14: Business Continuity Management: Buncefield and Iceland

More than 85% of the largest companies depend totally or largely on

information technology. On average, a company will lose one quarter of its daily earnings by the sixth day in which it cannot access

its IT system. The figure rises to 40% for banks, financial service firms

and public service companies.

Page 15: Business Continuity Management: Buncefield and Iceland

At Buncefield three multinational companies suffered serious effects, but 8000 jobs were saved by having business continuity plans

Page 16: Business Continuity Management: Buncefield and Iceland
Page 17: Business Continuity Management: Buncefield and Iceland

Northgate Ltd administered the payment of salaries for 209 clients ....and it was almost Christmas....

Page 18: Business Continuity Management: Buncefield and Iceland
Page 19: Business Continuity Management: Buncefield and Iceland

Northgate started work again the next day from other sites, including employees

working from home by Internet.

Page 20: Business Continuity Management: Buncefield and Iceland
Page 21: Business Continuity Management: Buncefield and Iceland

The local municipality, Dacorum, had a business continuity plan, which it used in

parallel with its emergency plan.

Page 22: Business Continuity Management: Buncefield and Iceland

Recovery and reconstruction

planning

Strategic, tactical & operational planning

Aftermath

Disaster

Monitoring prediction & warning

Permanent emergency plan

Business continuity plan

Page 23: Business Continuity Management: Buncefield and Iceland

Eyjafjallajökull

Page 24: Business Continuity Management: Buncefield and Iceland

• from 1935 to 2003 102 aircraft encountered significant concentrations of volcanic ash

• ash is not detectable by weather radar as it is dry

• ash can reach cruise altitudes in five minutes

• stratospheric ash concentrations may remain at circa 20,000 metres.

Volcanic Ash Aviation Hazard

Page 25: Business Continuity Management: Buncefield and Iceland

Eyjafjallajökull eruption of 1821-3: • started 19 Dec. 1821, ended Jan. 1823 • central vent, subglacial explosive eruption • volcanic explosivity index VEI=2 • 4 million m3 of tephra emitted

Eyjafjallajökull eruption of Apr-May 2010: • started 20 Mar 2010, ended 22 May • volcanic explosivity index VEI 2-3 • Vulcanian eruption style • maximum plume height 13 km • ash had 58% silica concentration.

Page 26: Business Continuity Management: Buncefield and Iceland

• US$1.7 billion losses for civil aviation

• air delivery of perishables and medical supplies knocked out

• business travel down, meetings cancelled

• passengers left stranded everywhere

• imbalance created in tourism and business travel.

Impacts of Eyjafjallajökull on business

Page 27: Business Continuity Management: Buncefield and Iceland

• potential civil aviation mass bankruptcy

• need for regulation and integrated planning for transportation in general

• liability issues for transportation (EU regulations)

• alternatives to travel, meeting and delivery need to be studied (create redundancy).

Implications of Eyjafjallajökull for business

Page 28: Business Continuity Management: Buncefield and Iceland

• two big unanticipated (but not improbable) events

• longer or worse disaster of similar kind would equal threshold crossed to much more profound implications

• use scenarios to explore implications and identify needs

• in crisis radical changes needed in ways of doing business

• organisational learning.

Conclusions

Page 29: Business Continuity Management: Buncefield and Iceland

Active context

(members'

tools)

After: Argote and Spektor (2011)

Environmental context

Latent organisational context

Practical experience

Knowledge

Active organisational

context

Page 30: Business Continuity Management: Buncefield and Iceland

[email protected] www.emergency-planning.blogspot.com