Upload
ida-jones
View
156
Download
2
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Presentation at BLEND Conference in Fresno, CA on 10/15/11
Citation preview
Got Plagiarism? I Have a Cure!Got Plagiarism? I Have a Cure!
Ida M. Jones, J.D.Verna Mae & Wayne D. Brooks Professor of Business Law
Special Assistant to the Senior Academic Technology Officer
California State University, [email protected]
559 278-5711
Ida M. Jones, J.D.Verna Mae & Wayne D. Brooks Professor of Business Law
Special Assistant to the Senior Academic Technology Officer
California State University, [email protected]
559 278-5711
Symptoms
• Writing varies from assignment to assignment
• Paper or other assignment:– Demonstrates sophisticated mastery
of terminology – Includes information not specifically
covered in the course– Has very sophisticated writing style
PLAGIARISM ISSUES AT CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY, FRESNO
One Test to Determine Cause: Survey Data
3
General Population Participants from Feb-April Spring, 2010
Pre-Workshop Post-Workshop0.0%
20.0%
40.0%
60.0%
80.0%
100.0%
5.9%
71.6%
94.1%
26.8%
0.0% 1.6%
Proportion of Participants Who Admitted to Plagiarism
PlagiarizedNever PlagiarizedFailed to Respond
CURES-MULTI-PRONGED TREATMENTS
TREATMENTS & CURE
• Workshops• Assignment Redesign• Institutional Implementation of
Policies & Enforcement
TREATMENT ONE: WORKSHOPS
Addressing Students’ Lack of Clear Definitions
Workshops
• Face to Face Workshops
• Academic Integrity Workshops
• Every semester 12-14 workshops offered
• Many faculty require attendance
• Online Plagiarism Module
• Blackboard• Delivered in
Face-to-Face or Online courses
Responses to Face to Face Workshops
80% of faculty members who attended the plagiarism workshop responded that they had learned details about plagiarism which they were previously unaware
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
I learned a great deal during the workshop
Strongly agree Agree Neither agree or disagree Disagree Strongly disagree Not applicable
9
The vast majority of students, 88% or 2958 of 3357, felt they learned a great deal from the workshops, even though most students thought they knew the definition of plagiarism.
(Academic Integrity survey, 2006-2008; Academic Integrity faculty survey, 2007).
TREATMENT TWO: ASSIGNMENT REDESIGN
Reducing students’ Ability to Find Assignments Elsewhere
Treat Students-Ability to Find Assignments Elsewhere-p. 1Re-design assignments to make them more plagiarism-resistant
11
Treat Students-Ability to Find Assignments Elsewhere-p. 2
• Re-consider how you assess whether students have used sources– Use plagiarism detection software such
as Safe Assign– Require that students attach copies of
their sources to their assignments– Others suggestions?
12
Treat Students-Ability to Find Assignments Elsewhere-p. 3
• Ask students to prove what they have learned– Brief oral presentations– Office meetings to ask for
summaries– Other suggestions?
13
Treat Students-Ability to Find Assignments Elsewhere-p. 4
• Create assignment(s) that tie to personal or classroom experiences– Require that assignments make specific
reference to textbook, classroom discussions
– Require that assignments make specific reference to personal experiences
– Other suggestions?
14
Treat Students-Ability to Find Assignments Elsewhere-p. 5
• Re-evaluate course structure and assignments– Change the assignments
every semester– Require submissions in steps– Other suggestions?
15
TREATMENT THREE: INSTITUTION-WIDE REMEDIES
Treat Lack of Institutional Implementation & Enforcement
Institution-Wide Remedies
• Create institutional definition of plagiarism
• Institute an Honor Code• Encourage consistent
enforcement of policies• Implement University-wide
sanctions
Conclusion-Questions?
18