Upload
tanya-joosten
View
866
Download
2
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Workshop from Sloan-C ALN Conference, 2011, in Orlando, FL, Access and Opportunity: A Comprehensive Strategy for a Blended Learning Initiative
Citation preview
Access and Opportunity: A Comprehensive Strategy for a Blended
Learning Initiative
Mary Niemiec and Tanya Joosten
Overview
• Defining blended for your campus
• Administrative Buy-In and Support
• Faculty training and support
• Student orientation and support
• Evidence of Impact
• Financial Model
Introductions
• Mary Niemiec, University of Nebraska, [email protected]
• Tanya Joosten, University of Wisconsin -Milwaukee, [email protected]
• All of you?
About UWM: Online.UWM.edu
First Last University First Last University
David Cassiday
University of Nebraska-Omaha Cathy Leaker
Empire State College
Aida DiazValencia College Maria Alice Lemos
FGV-Getulio Vargas Foundation
Thomas Fuhr SUNY Potsdam Kerry ThomasCollege of Liberal Arts
Jeffrey GetchellRegis University Trescot Wilson
Bermuda College
Cathy HardisonHeritage University Douglas Zehr
William Penn University
Kathleen HutchinsonMiami University Joseph Zisk
California University of PA
Presentation
• Can be found in digital form at:– http://tinyurl.com/aln2011
• Other resources can be found at:– http://aln2011.wikispaces.com
Defining blended for your campus
Blended course definition: A faculty perspective
• Blended courses – • Integrate online with traditional face-to- face
class activities in a planned, pedagogically valuable manner; and
• Replace a portion (institutionally defined) of face-to-face time by online activity
• (2005 Sloan-C Workshop on Blended Learning)
Web-enhanced0 - 20%
blended21 - 99%
Online100%
blended 121 - 50%
Online withcommensurate
reduction in seat time
blended 381 - 99%
Online withcommensurate
reduction in seat time
blended 251 - 80%
Online withcommensurate
reduction in seat time
Blended course definition: An Institutional Definition
UWM’s Institutional Definition
Blended course definitions: A Pedagogical Model
Activity: Blended definition
• Why does your campus need to define blended?
• Who needs to be involved in defining blended for your campus?
• What is blended? How is it different from face-to-face? Online? others?
• Where will the definition live?
Administrative Buy-In and Support
Areas of needed support
Faculty stipends
Course redesign support
Program development
Faculty training and support
UW-Milwaukee Faculty Development Program:
Purpose | Format | Outcomes
Overall purpose or goals
• Design, develop, teach, and advocate for blended courses
• A practical approach – Get started– Redesign course– Develop course material– Acquire teaching skills
Program format
• Taught in a blended format and in multiple formats during the academic year
• Face-to-face meetings and online assignments
– Model good blended practices
– Experience blended course as a student
– Effective teaching model
• Experienced blended teachers are program facilitators
Schematic of Faculty Development Program
1stface-to-face
session
Out-of-class assignment
and discussion(learning module)
2ndface-to-face
session
Out-of-class assignment
and discussion(assessment
plan)
Out-of-class activity
and discussion (syllabus)
Friday Friday
Wednesday WednesdaySunday
Program activities
• Presentation, demonstration, small-group activities, facilitator feedback, peer feedback, online discussion, consultation
• Emphasis on faculty “active learning”– Discussing– Questioning– Developing
Six Main Program Outcomes
1. Start of a redesigned course– Course redesign plan– Course syllabus– Learning modules
2. New teaching skills and knowledge– Building a learning community– Assessment of student learning
Six Main Program Outcomes
3. Re-examine both face-to-face and online component
4. Faculty know what to expect– Student expectations– Technology issues– Teaching challenges
5. Faculty get their questions answered
6. Faculty make an early start on course development
Program evaluation
• Progressive & summative – Classroom assessment techniques– “Reality check” survey– Anonymous survey at end of program
• Ongoing– Queries from instructors– Follow-up interactions– Formal debriefings– Certificate Program for Online and Blended
• Ten questions • Online vs. F2F - Integration• Designing learning modules
• Decision rubric for content choices
• Learning objects
Course Content
• Progressive/summative• Before, during, and after• Self evaluation• Peer evaluation• Student evaluation
Course Evaluation
• Rubrics• CATs• Templates • Traditional formats
Assessment Plan
• Synchronous/asynchronous• Establishing voice• Discussion forums• Small groups
Online Learning Community
• Managing expectations• Time management• Technology support
Helping Your Students
• Staying organized• Managing workload• Avoiding course and a half
Course Management
Course Redesign
Transitioning to blended Teaching
Eight lessons we’ve learned
1. Incentives & time for participation2. Participants with prior experience using technology3. Blended format for faculty development program4. Involve experienced blended teachers as facilitators5. Plenty of time for participant interaction (face-to-face)6. Provide regular, fast, and positive feedback7. Focus on pedagogy (redesign conversations) more than
technology (support solutions)8. Open door policy: Provide continuous support and maintain
contact
Eight ongoing challenges
1. Identification of blended courses2. Quality control of courses3. Certification of participants4. Workload issues5. Cohorts and stragglers6. Following up & measuring success7. Working with math, computing, engineering, and
the natural sciences8. Scalability
DiscussionIn groups, please consider these questions:
• Identify your role(s) [e.g., faculty trainer, IT support, campus administrator, faculty, etc.]
• What resources or elements of campus culture do you think you can draw on to establish a faculty blended course redesign program?
• What challenges do you think that you will face on your own campus when you consider implementing a faculty blended course redesign program? How might you address them?
Note: Please refer to the “Next Steps” handout for more details.
Student orientation and support
Learner Support and Resources• Tips for being a successful student in a blended course• Quiz to self-assess readiness to be a student in a blended course• Contact information for technical support or Help Desk • Checklist or other method for common troubleshooting tips• Tutorial(s) or aids for how to use D2L tools• Netiquette guidelines• Contact information for the instructor • Link(s) to Bookstore(s) to order textbooks or other instructional materials• Checklist or other method for common troubleshooting tips• Minimum computer hardware and software requirements• Sources for any required plug-ins (and links)• Links to appropriate campus library resources and services (e.g.,
reference librarian, electronic reserve, and online library tutorials)• Access to other campus services, tutoring, enrollment and registration,
adult and returning adults (synchronous support, JiTT)
Student Support
• What units on campus will provide services to students in your blended and online programs?
• How will you determine their readiness?
• How will needed services for blended students be supported?
Evidence of Impact
Sloan Pillars of Evaluation
Access
Learning Effectiveness
Cost Effectiveness
Student Satisfaction
Teacher Satisfaction
Questions of Evaluation
Why?
• Illustrate the impact of blended learning on teaching and learning to a
specific audience
Who?
• Provide multiple perspectives
What?
• Examine multiple variables
Questions of Evaluation
How?
• Gather individual perceptions (Likert survey, narratives) and/or
institutional data (grade and retention data)
When?
• Anticipate a realistic timetable
Possible Methods
• Who is your sample?
• Who is going to analyze?
• What methods will you use?
– Quantitative (Likert surveys, institutional data)
– Qualitative (open-ended surveys, focus groups/debriefing sessions,
narratives, case studies)
• How will you present the data? To who?
Examples of Instruments
Surveys, Narratives, Focus Groups
Sample Likert Survey ItemsStrongly Disagree ---------------------------- Strongly Agree, N/A
Engagement: The blended learning activities in required me to think critically.
Learning: The blended format helped me think more deeply about course material.
Performance: My experience in the blended environment helped me do better on my exams and other assignments.
Satisfaction: I would take another course that is blended.
Sample Open-Ended Survey
• What was one thing that you would change about your experience in a
blended course?
• What was one thing that you liked about your experience in a blended
course?
• How did the blended format impact your learning for this course?
Faculty Narrative SamplePlease tell us about your experience transforming your course into the blended learning model this past semester from start to end. In telling us your story of implementation, please consider the following:
• what persuaded you to use the blended format,• what steps you took to prepare for the start of the semester,• how you used the blended format to better meet your goals, and • how the blended format impacted your class.
Faculty Debriefing/Focus Group
Blended Model Design• What's one thing you did try that worked really well? • What's one new thing that you are going to try to do next time?Challenges and Obstacles• What was the most significant obstacle or problem you encountered
with the blended model? • What's the one thing that you wish you had known *before* you started
teaching using the blended model?Faculty Development and Support• If you could ask your for more help or support in one particular area,
what would you ask for?
UCF Distributed Learning Impact Evaluation
Students Faculty
Reactive behaviorpatterns
SuccessSatisfaction
Demographicprofiles
Retention
Strategies forsuccess
Online programs
Writing project model
Large online classes
Higher orderevaluation models
Student evaluation ofinstruction
Theater
Informationfluency
Generationalcomparisons
Activity: Planning Your EvaluationWhy?What do you want to illustrate and to who? Otherwise, how will the results of the evaluation be
shared and used? Who?What is the size of your implementation? What?What variables are you interested in understanding better? How?What existing data do you have available to you through your institutional research unit or others
(e.g., teacher evaluations, grade performance, student characteristics, retention rates)? When?What timeline do you foresee for this evaluation?
Financial Model
Sloanconsortium.org/blended