Upload
gdnmaximus
View
135
Download
2
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
To understand aCommunity - know itsnumbers
Presentation to American Indian Studies Association Annual Conference, Panel on Census and ACS Data Analysis 2013
Changes in Census
Self identificationfrom
Enumerator identification
1960 – 1980
1940 1950 1960 1970 19800
200,000
400,000
600,000
800,000
1,000,000
1,200,000
1,400,000
1,600,000
Total Indian, Eskimo, Aleut Population
Self identificationGenealogy
(Who are your grandparents?)
Tribal enrollmentPolitical Status
(Are you on the tribal rolls?)
Another Change
Special ReservationQuestionnaire
1980
1980 American Indian Supplementary Questionnaire:
Used on all reservations and in “historic areas” of Oklahoma
for all households where at least one person identified as American Indian
to obtain information to be used by tribal governments and federal agencies
In 2000Another Change
Multiple ResponsesPermitted
to the Race Question
In 1990 the Censusquestionnaire asked:
“Fill ONE circle for the racethat the person considers
himself/herself to be”
In 2000 the racequestion read:
The result:
1990 2000 20100
1,000,000
2,000,000
3,000,000
4,000,000
5,000,000
6,000,000
1,959,2342,475,956
2,932,248
1,643,345
2,288,331
Growth in AI/AN Population
AI-AN Alone AI-AN Multi-Racial
Are there population characteristic
differencesbetween the
AI/AN “alone” and theAI/AN “in combination”
(multi-racial) populations?
Who Lived Where in 2010?
18.5%
9.3%
2.2%
70.0%
Residence of AI/AN Alone in 2010
Fed Res OTSAsANVs Other
1.3% 5.4%0.5%
92.8%
Residence of AI/AN "in Comb" in 2010
Fed Res OTSAsANVs Other
AI/AN A
lone -
Fed Res/T
L
AI/AN A
lone -
National
AI/AN M
R - Natio
nal
Total P
op - Natio
nal
18.8%
13.9%13.0%
7.9%
Official Unemployment Rate
AI/AN Alone - Fed Res/TL
AI/AN Alone - National AI/AN MR - National Total Pop - National
36.8%
26.4%
19.7%
13.8%
Poverty Rate
2010 ACS
American Community Survey
Population Characteristics
1940 to 2000 – “Long Form” used to sample for socio-economic characteristics
2010 – No Long Form; only ACS
ACS is Different• Continuous survey
• Annual results, but aggregated over 5 years for smaller communities
• Smaller sample, with greater sampling error, particularly for small areas and small populations
Is the ACS Counting the Entire AI/AN Population?
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 20112,250,000
2,350,000
2,450,000
2,550,000
2,650,000
2,750,000
2,850,000
2,950,000
AI/AN Alone Population
2010 Census ACS Estimates
AI/A
N A
lon
e P
op
ula
tio
n
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011600000
625000
650000
675000
700000
725000
750000
775000
800000
825000
850000
875000
900000
AI/AN Alone Youth Population
2010 Census ACS Estimates
AI/A
N A
lon
e Y
ou
th P
op
ula
tio
n
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 20111500000
1600000
1700000
1800000
1900000
2000000
2100000
2200000
2300000
2400000
2500000
2600000
2700000AI/AN Multi-Racial Population
2010 Census ACS Estimates
AI/A
N M
ult
i-R
ac
ial P
op
ula
tio
n
Who’s Missing?
Overall, the reservation counts in the ACS match the 2010 Census counts, but there appears to be an AI/AN ‘alone’ undercount on 30% of the larger reservations
Who’s Missing?
The AI/AN alone undercounts in the ACS appear to be the largest in the biggest metro area counties
If the ACS is about characteristics data, how
accurate is the data, particularly at the
reservation and county levels?
Analysis of:
• Sampling Error
• Non-Sampling Error
Summary Statistics for Sampling ErrorCV for Number of AI/AN Alone Unemployed 16 to 64
Reservations in US with AI/AN Alone Population 1,000 or More
CV RangeNumber of
ReservationsPercent of Reservations in
Universe
0% to 15% 14 17.1%15% to 30% 45 54.9%Over 30% 23 28.0%
Total Reservations 82 100.0%
Summary Statistics for Sampling ErrorCV for Number of AI/AN Alone Unemployed 16 to 64Counties in US with AI/AN Alone Population 1,000 or
Moreand AI/AN Alone Percent of Total Pop 10% or Less
CV RangeNumber of Counties
Percent of Counties in Universe
0% to 15% 21 5.8%15% to 30% 110 30.6%Over 30% 229 63.6%
Total Counties 360 100.0%
Summary Statistics for Sampling ErrorCV for Number of AI/AN Alone in Poverty
Reservations in US with AI/AN Alone Population 1,000 or More
CV RangeNumber of
ReservationsPercent of Reservations in
Universe
0% to 15% 31 37.8%15% to 30% 46 56.1%Over 30% 5 6.1%
Total Reservations 82 100.0%
Summary Statistics for Sampling ErrorCV for Number of AI/AN Alone Persons in Poverty
Counties with AI/AN Alone Population of 1,000 or Moreand AI/AN Alone Percent of Total Population of 10% or
Less
CV Range Number of CountiesPercent of Counties in
Universe
0% to 15% 44 12.2%15% to 30% 178 49.4%Over 30% 138 38.3%
Selected Counties 360 100.0%
Non-sampling error: the case of the Navajo Reservation
Is the AI/AN alone unemployment rateon Navajo
• 52%• 26%• 19%
ACS: Use with Caution
For tribal planning
For federal programfund allocation
Innovation
Tribal and Urban IndianCollaboration with Universities
on Data Issues
Recent Decades
WINDSShoshone and Arapaho Tribes
University of Wyoming
Nez PerceNez Perce Tribe
Washington State University
Los AngelesUrban Indian Community
UCLA
To understand acommunity, know itsnumbers
and how to interpret them