Upload
frederik-questier
View
1.127
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
F. Questier, S. Froeliger, Acceptance model for Free Open Source Software in (Flemish) schools, 37th Annual Conference of the Association for Teacher Education in Europe, Turkey, August 2012
Citation preview
Acceptance model forFree Open Source Software in (Flemish) schools
Prof. dr. Frederik QuestierSébastien Froeliger
Vrije Universiteit Brussel
28th of August 2012
This presentation can be found athttp://questier.com
http://www.slideshare.net/Frederik_Questier
3
Our social responsibility:how open is the future?
4
"The most fundamental way of helping other
people,is to teach people
how to do things betteror how to better their
lives.
For peoplewho use computers,this means sharing
the recipesyou use on your
computer,in other words
the programs you run."
5
1980's: Stallman defined“Free Software”
➢The freedom to
➢ use
➢ study
➢ distribute
➢ improve
the program
1998: “Open Source” sounds better as “Free Software”?
7
The software Freedomsrequire access to the source code
→ “Open Source Software”Free Libre Open Source Software (FLOSS)
Source code: if encrypt(password) == encryptedpassword, then login=1, end
Compiled code: 001001011101010011001100001111011000110001110001101
The free software worldcharacteristics
➢ FLOSS exists for all tasks
➢ Huge
➢ e.g. 324K projects, 3.4M contributors @ sourceforge.net➢ e.g. IBM > 1 billion $ per year
➢ Several business models
➢ Well organised
➢ User friendly ← written by users for users
➢ Cross-platform ← recompile source code
➢ High development pace ← reuse of best modules
➢ High quality ← peer review, reuse = survival of the fittest
➢ High security ← peer review, Unix origin, modular, encryption
Why FLOSS?➢ reduce (license) costs
➢ reduce digital divide
➢ eliminate software piracy
➢ easier license management
➢ easy to localize and customize
➢ better quality (peer review, intrinsic-motivated developers)
➢ increase security (security by design vs security by obscurity)
➢ increase interoperability (open standards)
➢ reduce dependencies from monopolies & foreign software companies
What is influencing
FLOSS useby school staff?
Methodology
➢ Interviews
➢ Model conceptualization
➢ Pilot survey
➢ Web based survey
➢ Model validation
Basis for conceptual model
➢ Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology ➢ Theory of Reasoned Action➢ Technology Acceptance Model➢ Motivational Model➢ Theory of Planned Behaviour➢ Combined TAM & TPB➢ Model of PC Utilization➢ Innovation Diffusion Theory➢ Social Cognitive Theory
➢ Innovation diffusion Model
UTAUT model
Our conceptual model
Validated acceptance model for Free Software in (Flemish) schools
Do you think it is desirableto use FLOSS in education?
Which softwaredo you use at school?
Which softwaredo you use at school?
What is your motivationto use Free Software?
What is holding back the adoption of FLOSS in your school?
23
Conclusions
➢ FLOSS is being used, but not as a routine➢ Lack of knowledge➢ Misconceptions➢ Perceived barriers
24
Recommendations
➢ for schools➢ Develop FLOSS vision, plan, expertise➢ Teach students how to share
➢ for government and managing structures ➢ Give central role to ICT-coordinators➢ Create an expertise network➢ Improve FLOSS information
Copyleft Frederik Questier, Vrije Universiteit Brussel 25
DAREDARETO SHARETO SHARE
Questions?Thank you!
Credits
➢ L’associazione studentesca S.P.R.I.Te. http://www.geektees.com/funny-shirts/software-is-like-sex-its-better-when-its-free-t-shirt/
➢ Cartoon Open Source Fish by openssoft
➢ Question mark CC-by by Stefan Baudy
➢ OPEN, CC-by-nc-sa by Tom Magliery
➢ Open arrow, CC-by-nd by ChuckCoker
➢ Share matches CC-by-nc-nd by Josh Harper